Effect of maneuvers, diuresis, and fluid administration on ultrasound-measured liver stiffness after Fontan.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of stress maneuvers/interventions on ultrasound liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in patients with Fontan circulation and healthy controls. METHODS: In this prospective, IRB-approved study of 10 patients after Fontan palliation and 10 healthy controls, ultrasound 2D shear-wave elastography LSMs were acquired at baseline and after maximum inspiration, expiration, standing, handgrip, aerobic exercise, i.v. fluid (500 mL normal saline) administration, and i.v. furosemide (20 mg) administration. Absolute and percent change in LSM were compared between baseline and each maneuver, and then from fluid infusion to after diuresis. RESULTS: Median ages were 25.5 and 26 years in the post-Fontan and control groups (p = 0.796). LSMs after Fontan were higher at baseline (2.6 vs. 1.3 m/s) and with all maneuvers compared to controls (all p < 0.001). Changes in LSM with maneuvers, exercise, fluid, or diuresis were not significant when compared to baseline in post-Fontan patients. LSM in controls increased with inspiration (+0.02 m/s, 1.6%, p = 0.03), standing (+0.07 m/s, 5.5%, p = 0.03), and fluid administration (+0.10 m/s, 7.8%, p = 0.002), and decreased 60 minutes after diuretic administration (-0.05 m/s, -3.9%, p = 0.01) compared to baseline. LSM after diuretic administration significantly decreased when compared to after i.v. fluid administration at 30 minutes (-0.79 m/s, -26.5%, p = 0.004) and 60 minutes (-0.78 m/s, -26.2%, p = 0.017) for patients after Fontan and controls at 15 minutes (-0.12 m/s, -8.70%, p = 0.002), 30 minutes (-0.15 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.003), and 60 minutes (-0.1 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: LSM after Fontan is higher with more variability compared to controls. Diuresis is associated with significantly decreased liver stiffness in both patients after Fontan and controls, with the suggestion of a greater effect in Fontan patients.

Furosemide for patent ductus arteriosus during cyclooxygenase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although furosemide is used during cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor therapy for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), there are concerns regarding increased ductal closure failure and acute renal failure (ARF). This systematic review explores the effects of furosemide during COX inhibitor therapy. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases for randomized clinical trials that assessed furosemide during COX inhibitor therapy for PDA in preterm infants. The primary outcome measure was PDA closure failure. Mortality and other complications were also assessed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized control trials, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. RESULTS: Overall, three trials involving 121 patients were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of PDA closure failure was 28%. Although the result of PDA closure failure, mortality, and ARF were obtained, other outcomes were not described in any of the studies. The risk of bias was high. The risk of PDA closure failure did not increase with furosemide administration. Furosemide was not associated with decreased mortality but was associated with an increased risk of ARF (risk ratio, 4.96 [95% confidence interval: 1.80-13.6]). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSION: Although furosemide is not associated with an increased risk of PDA closure failure or mortality, the risk of ARF increases after furosemide administration during COX inhibitor therapy.

Pharmaceutical intervention for hypertension in a rural district of the Republic of Zambia: a model-based economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: In Zambia, 19.1% of the adult population had elevated blood pressure. Hence, the Ministry of Health in Zambia designated the improvement of hypertension (HTN) care services as a priority policy. However, there are limited data on cost-effective interventions to address HTN and their budget impact in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of this paper is to investigate the cost-effectiveness of primary-level interventions for HTN (pharmaceutical treatments) compared with no treatment, and the budget impact, in the Chongwe District, rural Zambia. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was undertaken from the perspective of healthcare provider, employing a cohort Markov model with a lifetime horizon. The model was developed and populated with evidence from the literature, including novel locally collected cost data. The analysis was run for the overall population aged 40 years and above and for subpopulations stratified by three levels of risk and gender in Chongwe District by using cost data directly collected. A probabilistic analysis was performed to assess the probability of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The dominant treatment for the general population was a combination therapy of diuretics and calcium blockers. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$1114 compared with no treatment. This was the most cost-effective first-line medication for HTN for all subgroup populations, except for the subgroups classified as low-risk defined by WHO. The estimated annual budget impact was US$1 015 605 in total if all HTN patients in Chongwe District received the most cost-effective treatment. Considering only material costs, the annual total budget was US$29 435. CONCLUSION: The most cost-effective first-line medication for HTN in rural Zambia was the combination therapy of diuretics and calcium blockers for the general population. From the perspective of budget impact, local government could need to secure approximately US$30 000 to facilitate the delivery of the most cost-effective HTN medications to the entire population over 40 years in need.

Guest Editorial.

As we continue to advance in the field of medicine, the role of loop diuretics remains crucial in the management of a wide range of conditions associated with fluid retention. The introduction of torsemide has brought a new dimension to diuretic therapy, offering unique benefits that distinguish it from its counterparts.

Preface.

The field of diuretic therapy has witnessed significant advancements over the decades. Loop diuretics and other diuretic agents are crucial in the management of various conditions characterized by fluid overload. Torsemide, a loop diuretic agent, has unique pharmacological properties, safety profiles, and varied clinical applications. This special journal supplement aims to provide a comprehensive examination of torsemide, highlighting its role in contemporary medical practice.

Torsemide in Edema Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Torsemide is a loop diuretic used to manage edema associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI). It acts by inhibiting sodium and chloride ions reabsorption in the ascending limb of the loop of Henle, thereby increasing urine output and reducing fluid accumulation. Compared to other diuretics, torsemide has an extended duration of action, higher bioavailability, and its elimination route is primarily through the hepatic route, making it effective in patients with CKD and AKI. Clinical studies indicate that torsemide can improve symptoms of fluid overload and potentially enhance renal function.

Loop Diuretics: An Overview of Its History and Evolution.

The loop of Henle plays a key role in kidney function, especially in retaining solutes and concentrating urine. Diuretic agents, crucial for managing fluid overload and related conditions like hypertension and heart failure (HF), enhance water and electrolyte excretion. The history of diuretics dates back to 1775 with the discovery of Digitalis, evolving significantly with the introduction of chlorothiazide in 1957, which revolutionized diuretic therapy. Loop diuretics, developed in the 1950s and including drugs like torsemide, furosemide, and ethacrynic acid, are potent agents acting on the loop of Henle. They are vital for treating severe fluid overload conditions and require careful monitoring to manage potential side effects.

Torsemide in Edema Associated with Hepatic Impairment.

Hepatic edema is caused by decreased hepatic protein synthesis, a consequence of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Fluid accumulation occurs when there is an increase in hydrostatic pressure in the hepatic sinusoids and splanchnic capillaries, as well as low albumin. The first-line treatment for cirrhosis-related ascites is an aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone); however, in severe and recurring ascites, a combination of aldosterone antagonists and loop diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) is preferable. Torsemide outperformed furosemide in terms of natriuretic and diuretic effects at an equivalent dose. Pharmacological features of torsemide, such as lesser hypokalemia effect, longer duration of action, higher bioavailability, and extended half-life, make it a better alternative than furosemide. In clinical studies, it is considered a safer and more acceptable choice with fewer complications.

Torsemide in the Management of Essential Hypertension.

Torsemide, a loop diuretic, is increasingly recognized for its role in managing essential hypertension. Its mechanism of action involves inhibiting the reabsorption of sodium and chloride ions in the ascending loop of Henle in the kidneys. By doing so, torsemide promotes diuresis, which refers to increased urine production, and subsequently lowers blood pressure. Studies have shown that torsemide is comparably effective to other antihypertensive agents in lowering blood pressure, with the added benefit of potentially improving renal function. However, while torsemide shows promise in hypertensive management, further research is necessary to fully understand its long-term effects and to establish optimal dosing strategies. Future research should focus on clarifying its role in long-term blood pressure control and refining its use in clinical practice to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Torsemide as a Primary Choice in Edema Associated with Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) is the fastest-growing disease with a higher fatality rate. The most differentiating feature of HF is pulmonary or peripheral edema, which is characterized by a gradient between intravascular and extravascular pressure. Loop diuretics were chosen as the primary treatment for edema associated with HF due to their efficacy and early onset of action. If an oral dose had not been provided, intravenous (IV) administration of torsemide, or equal doses of furosemide and bumetanide, was preferred. However, the key variables for selecting and administering loop diuretics are their pharmacological qualities as well as their clinical efficacy. Torsemide has greater bioavailability, a higher rate of absorption, a longer duration of action, and lesser ototoxicity, making it the primary choice in the management of edematous HF.

Torsemide in the Management of Pulmonary Edema.

Pulmonary edema, either cardiogenic or noncardiogenic, is caused by fluid accumulation in the alveolar spaces. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE), one of the causes of congestive heart failure (CHF), is treated with loop diuretics. Torsemide and furosemide were found to be useful in the treatment of CHF-associated pulmonary edema due to their ability to lower pulmonary capillary pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, respectively. Pharmacological features of torsemide, such as greater bioavailability, higher absorption rate, and efficacy, make it a better alternative for treating pulmonary edema than the regularly used loop diuretic, furosemide. Torsemide administered intravenously was found to be both efficacious and well tolerated in CPE. However, more research is needed to determine its usefulness in non-CPE.

Diuretic resistance in acute heart failure: proposal for a new urinary sodium-based definition.

BACKGROUND: Diuretic resistance is a relevant clinical issue in acute heart failure (AHF), but a standardized, quantitative definition is still missing. The aim of this analysis was to highlight discrepancies between previously proposed definitions of diuretic response and to propose a new urinary sodium (NaU)-based definition of diuretic efficiency (DE) to identify diuretic resistant (DR) patients. METHODS: Three historical definitions of diuretic response and a new NaU-based DE definition, evaluating total NaU after the first diuretic bolus per 40 mg furosemide administered, were applied in a retrospective analysis to an AHF population treated with intravenous (i.v.) loop diuretics. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital clinical data and outcomes at discharge and mid-term follow-up were collected and compared among DR and non-DR patients for each definition. RESULTS: Among 53 patients, 39 (73.6%), 51 (96.2%) and 3 (5.7%) were DR according to weight-derived, diuresis-derived, and spot NaU definition, respectively. The median value of the new NaU-based definition was 31 mmol/40 mg and patients were stratified accordingly. DR patients showed lower cumulative diuresis (5200 mL, 3300-6700 vs 9825 mL, 6200-12200, p = 0.007) and weight loss (4 kg, 1-5 vs 6 kg, 3-8.5, p = 0.023), higher BNP levels (808 pg/mL, 443-1037 vs 351 pg/mL, 209-859, p = 0.062) at the conclusion of protocol-guided i.v diuretic therapy, which was less frequently stopped due to decongestion in DR as compared to non-DR patients (57.7% vs 85.2%, p = 0.026). Six-months mortality or HF hospitalizations were more frequent in DR patients (OR 18.6, 95% CI 2.1-161.2, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The NaU-based DE definition might solve discrepancies of other previously proposed definitions.

[Renal failure and drug-drug interactions]. / Bei Niereninsuffizienz auf Arzneimittel-Interaktionen achten!

Renal failure is common and comes with a steep increasing prevalence in older patients. It is a frequent aspect in multimorbidity and associated with polypharmacia. Based on available literature an overview is given concerning important drug-drug interactions and how to avoid or manage them. Among a large variety of possible interactions anticoagulation and diuretic therapy still represent the highest clinical relevance.

Prevalent and new use of common drugs for the incidence of community-acquired acute kidney injury: cohort and case-crossover study.

Although community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) represents a significant subset of all AKI incidence, evidence is limited due to the lack of comprehensive data prior to diagnosis. Here, we examined the risk of drug use for CA-AKI by using exhaustive pre-diagnostic prescription data. We included 78,754 working-age healthy individuals who underwent an annual health checkup program. We conducted a cohort study to assess the association between prevalent drug use and subsequent CA-AKI incidence using the Cox proportional hazard model. Subsequently, we conducted a case-crossover study to compare the new drug use in the case period directly before the CA-AKI incidence (- 3 to 0 months) with that in the control period far before the CA-AKI incidence (- 15 to - 12 months and - 9 to - 6 months) using the conditional Poisson regression model. The prevalent use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors was associated with an increased CA-AKI incidence, but the new use was not. The new use of diuretics, anti-infectious drugs, and contrast medium was also associated with an increased CA-AKI incidence. These results suggest we need to pay attention for the incidence of AKI among the general population taking those common drugs.

UMOD Genotype-Blinded Trial of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Torasemide.

BACKGROUND: UMOD (uromodulin) has been linked to hypertension through potential activation of Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC2), a target of loop diuretics. We posited that hypertensive patients carrying the rs13333226-AA UMOD genotype would demonstrate greater blood pressure responses to loop diuretics, potentially mediated by this UMOD/NKCC2 interaction. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, genotype-blinded trial evaluated torasemide (torsemide) efficacy on systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction over 16 weeks in nondiabetic, hypertensive participants uncontrolled on ≥1 nondiuretic antihypertensive for >3 months. The primary end point was the change in 24-hour ambulatory SBP (ABPM SBP) and SBP response trajectories between baseline and 16 weeks by genotype (AA versus AG/GG) due to nonrandomized groups at baseline (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03354897). RESULTS: Of 251 enrolled participants, 222 received torasemide and 174 demonstrated satisfactory treatment adherence and had genotype data. The study participants were middle-aged (59±11 years), predominantly male (62%), obese (body mass index, 32±7 kg/m2), with normal eGFR (92±17 mL/min/1.73 m²) and an average baseline ABPM of 138/81 mm Hg. Significant reductions in mean ABPM SBP were observed in both groups after 16 weeks (AA, -6.57 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.44 to -4.69]; P<0.0001; AG/GG, -3.22 [95% CI, -5.93 to -0.51]; P=0.021). The change in mean ABPM SBP (baseline to 16 weeks) showed a difference of -3.35 mm Hg ([95% CI, -6.64 to -0.05]; P=0.048) AA versus AG/GG genotypes. The AG/GG group displayed a rebound in SBP from 8 weeks, differing from the consistent decrease in the AA group (P=0.004 for difference in trajectories). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm a plausible interaction between UMOD and NKCC2 and suggest a potential role for genotype-guided use of loop diuretics in hypertension management. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03354897.