Protocol for a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as a postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer treated with preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil treatment (PENTAGON trial).

BACKGROUND: In Japan, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the risk of recurrence after surgical resection remains high. Although a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody, as postoperative adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery established its superior efficacy as adjuvant therapy, the efficacy for patients who received preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has not been demonstrated. This study aims to elucidate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. METHODS: This study is a multi-institutional, single-arm, Phase II trial. We plan to recruit 130 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, who have undergone preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. If the patient did not have a pathological complete response, nivolumab is started as a postoperative adjuvant therapy within 4-16 weeks after surgery. The nivolumab dose is 480 mg/day every four weeks. Nivolumab is administered for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival; the secondary endpoints are overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and incidence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge this study is the first trial establishing the efficacy of nivolumab as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. In Japan, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is a well-established standard treatment for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, developing an effective postoperative adjuvant therapy has been essential for improving oncological outcomes.

Pegfilgrastim for the management of neutropenia during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy is a new standard for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The optimal timing of pegfilgrastim with the DCF regimen to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) remains controversial. The effectiveness of concomitant pegfilgrastim administration with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in the DCF regimen was therefore assessed. METHODS: All patients who received neoadjuvant DCF for esophageal cancer were retrospectively assessed. Patients who had been scheduled to receive pegfilgrastim on days 3-5 (early group) or days 7-9 (regular group) of the DCF regimen were included. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to assess risk factors for FN. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 26 patients in the early group received pegfilgrastim as scheduled. In the 62 patients of the regular group, 51 received pegfilgrastim at a median of 7 days after starting DCF chemotherapy. However, 11 patients in the regular group could not receive pegfilgrastim. Twenty-two patients of the regular group and 2 patients of the early group developed FN after the first session of DCF. Early administration of pegfilgrastim and grade 4 neutropenia were significantly associated with onset of FN, with multivariate analysis identifying early administration of pegfilgrastim as an independent preventive factor and grade 4 neutropenia as a risk factor, after adjusting for sex and age. CONCLUSION: Early pegfilgrastim administration is a safe approach that reduces the incidence of FN in DCF therapy. Using pegfilgrastim with continuous 5-FU infusion in the DCF regimen represents a reasonable option to prevent FN.

Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines and incidence of esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studying carcinogens in tobacco and nontobacco sources may be key to understanding the pathogenesis and geographic distribution of esophageal cancer. METHODS: The Golestan Cohort Study has been conducted since 2004 in a region with high rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. For this nested study, the cases comprised of all incident cases by January 1, 2018; controls were matched to the case by age, sex, residence, time in cohort, and tobacco use. We measured urinary concentrations of 33 exposure biomarkers of nicotine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between the 90th vs the 10th percentiles of the biomarker concentrations and incident esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Among individuals who did not currently use tobacco (148 cases and 163 controls), 2 acrolein metabolites, 2 acrylonitrile metabolites, 1 propylene oxide metabolite, and one 1,3-butadiene metabolite were significantly associated with incident esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (adjusted odds ratios between 1.8 and 4.3). Among tobacco users (57 cases and 63 controls), metabolites of 2 other volatile organic compounds (styrene and xylene) were associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 6.2 and 9.0, respectively). In tobacco users, 2 tobacco-specific nitrosamines (NNN and N'-Nitrosoanatabine) were also associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Suggestive associations were seen with some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (especially 2-hydroxynaphthalene) in nonusers of tobacco products and other tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco users. CONCLUSION: These novel associations based on individual-level data and samples collected many years before cancer diagnosis, from a population without occupational exposure, have important public health implications.

Nivolumab in unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide. In view of biology and anatomical restrictions, multimodality treatment strategies have been developed for EC. However, the prognosis of patients with advanced EC remains especially poor. Immunotherapy, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7 blockade, has emerged as a potent treatment for many types of cancer and has been approved in many countries. Based on the results of the ATTRACTION-3 trial, nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was approved by the US FDA for patients with platinum-resistant, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The CheckMate 648 trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab with platinum-based fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy and combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, showed a survival benefit in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared with doublet chemotherapy. This review focuses on nivolumab-containing treatments for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PD-1 inhibitors combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin in first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with paclitaxel/cisplatinum (PD-1 + TP) and fluoropyrimidine/cisplatinum (PD-1 + FP) both have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is no consensus on which chemotherapy regimen combined with PD-1 has better efficacy. To deal with this important issue in the first-line treatment of patients with ESCC, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. METHODS: Data were collected from eligible studies searched in Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the OS, and PFS, odds ratio (OR) for the objective response rate (ORR) and ≥ 3 grade treatment-related adverse events (≥ 3TRAEs) were estimated to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TP or FP. RESULTS: Five RCTs and one retrospective study involving 3685 patients and evaluating four treatments were included in this NMA. Compared to other treatments, PD-1 + TP was better. For the PFS, the HRs for PD-1 + TP compared to PD-1 + FP, TP and FP were 0.59 (0.44, 0.80), 0.56 (0.51, 0.61) and 0.45 (0.37, 0.56) respectively. For the OS, PD-1 + TP was also a better treatment compared to other treatments. The HRs were 0.74 (0.56, 0.96), 0.64 (0.57, 0.71), 0.53 (0.43, 0.67) respectively. For the ORR, there was no significant difference between PD-1 + TP and PD-1 + FP, and the ORs were 1.2 (0.69, 2.11). Compare with TP and FP, PD-1 + TP had an obvious advantage, ORs were 2.5 (2.04, 3.04) and 2.95 (1.91, 4.63). For ≥ 3TRAEs, PD-1 + TP compared to other treatments, ORs were 1.34 (0.74, 2.46) and 1.13 (0.92, 1.38) and 2.23 (1.35, 3.69). CONCLUSION: PD-1 + TP significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to PD-1 + FP. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, PD-1 + TP may be a superior first-line treatment option for ESCC.

Local recurrence risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma due to intralesional damage during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is unclear whether additional treatment should be considered given the recurrence risk after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) when the vertical margin is positive or unclear (VM1/VMX) due to intralesional damage. This study aimed to elucidate the local recurrence risk of ESCC caused by intralesional damage during ESD. METHODS: Among consecutive patients with pT1a ESCCs initially treated by ESD at our institution between January 2006 and December 2018, ESCCs diagnosed as VM1/VMX were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were piecemeal resection and any additional treatment after ESD. Intralesional damage included the following three types: a macroscopic hole inside the lesion, an incision from the lateral margin of the specimen into the lesion, and crushing injury or burn effect into the deepest area of the lesion without an obvious hole. The local recurrence rate after ESD was primarily analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1174 pT1a ESCCs initially treated using ESD, 22 lesions were histopathologically diagnosed as VM1/VMX due to intralesional damage (1.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8%). At a median follow-up period of 60.0 (interquartile range, 15.0-84.0) months, no local recurrence was observed (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0-13.3%) among 21 lesions finally evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of intralesional damage during ESD for ESCC on local recurrence might be negligible. Follow-up without additional treatment may be acceptable even if intralesional damage occurs and results in VM1/VMX after ESD for pT1a ESCCs.

Safety and tolerability of first-line durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with poor prognosis; new first-line systemic treatment options are needed. Combining immuno-oncology therapies with standard chemotherapy may represent a promising approach for the treatment of solid tumors. Results from a Phase Ib study evaluating durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC are reported. METHODS: Adults with advanced or metastatic ESCC who were candidates for first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received durvalumab 1500 mg (Day 1), tremelimumab 75 mg (Day 1), cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (Day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m2 (Days 1-5) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or discontinuation due to toxicity. The study consisted of safety run-in (Part A) and expansion (Part B) periods. The primary endpoint was safety. Antitumor activity was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled, 6 in Part A and 10 in Part B, and received a median of 4.0 treatment cycles. All patients were Asian; median age was 65.0 years. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs) related to cisplatin and 5-FU, and 8 (50.0%) patients experienced AEs related to durvalumab and tremelimumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 (43.8%) patients. There were no deaths associated with AEs. Six (37.5%) patients achieved an objective response. Median progression-free survival was 3.75 months, and median overall survival was 9.69 months. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy demonstrated manageable safety and antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, warranting further investigation in randomized trials. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02658214.

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A prospective, open label, randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) accounts for approximately 90% of esophageal cancer cases in China. There are no standard regimens for second or third-line chemotherapy of metastatic squamous esophageal cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the security and effectiveness of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of ESCC. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients with metastatic ESCC confirmed by histopathology were enrolled into this study. These patients had failure of the first-line chemotherapy combination of fluorouracil or platinum or paclitaxel and had not undergone chemotherapy with irinotecan or raltitrexed previously. Patients were randomly divided into irinotecan combined with raltitrexed group (experiment group) and irinotecan monotherapy group (control group). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoint. RESULTS: In the control group, the median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) of patients were 3.37 and 5.3 months. In the experiment group, mPFS and mOS were 3.91 and 7.0 months. There was statistical significance of PFS and OS between two groups (PFS P = 0.002, OS P = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, in the second-line treatment, the mPFS of control and experiment group, was 3.90 and 4.60 months, mOS was 6.95 and 8.5 months, which was statistically significant differences between the two groups. (PFS P = 0.001, OS P = 0.005), In the third-line and beyond treatment, mPFS of control and experiment group was 2.80 and 3.19 months, mOS were 4.5 and 4.8 months. But there was no significant difference of PFS or OS between the two groups (PFS P = 0.19, OS P = 0.31). There was no statistical significance of toxicity side effects between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PFS and OS of irinotecan plus raltitrexed may be better than that of irinotecan monotherapy, especially in second line treatment, which should be confirmed with a phase III study including much more patients.

Transhiatal esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy versus sweet for T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare transhiatal esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy (TEM) with Sweet procedure for patients with T2 midpiece and distal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: By virtue of propensity score matching, 42 T2 ESCC patients who underwent TEM (n = 21) and Sweet procedure (n = 21) were included. Both the short-term and long-term outcomes of these patients were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the Sweet procedure, the TEM procedure showed less operation time (133.8 ± 30.4 vs 171.2 ± 30.3 min, p = 0.038), reduced drainage volume in 24 h (83.8 ± 142.3 vs 665.2 ± 220.0 mL, p < 0.001), shorter reserving time of chest tube (26.2 ± 26.3 vs 82.8 ± 49.8 h, p < 0.001) and less dissected lymph nodes (12.4 ± 6.1 vs 17.0 ± 6.5, p = 0.041). The average survival period was 62.6 months for TEM group and 62.5 months for Sweet group (p = 0.753). The COX regression showed that the nodal staging could be regarded as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.013), not the surgical method (p = 0. 754). CONCLUSIONS: The TEM procedure could reduce operative trauma compared with the Sweet procedure. The long-term survival rate of TEM group was acceptable. The lymph node resection was a major disadvantage of TEM procedure. The TEM procedure might be an alternate choice for T2 midpiece and distal ESCC patients, especially for patients who cannot tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy.

Statin Use During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Improved Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the effect of statin use during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on overall survival and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)-specific survival in patients with ESCC receiving standard CCRT. METHODS: In this propensity score-matching cohort study, we used data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database and National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate the effects of statin use during the period of CCRT on overall survival and ESCC-specific survival. RESULTS: Statin use during the period of CCRT was found to be a considerable and independent prognostic factor for overall survival and ESCC-specific survival. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality in the statin group compared with that of the non-statin group was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.84, p = 0.0009). The aHR for ESCC-specific mortality in the statin group compared with that of the non-statin group was 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.84, p = 0.0016). The use of hydrophilic statins such as rosuvastatin and pravastatin was associated with the greatest survival benefits. A dose-response relationship was also found, with higher cumulative defined daily doses and higher daily intensity of statin use associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to reveal that statin use during the period of CCRT for ESCC is associated with improvement in overall survival and ESCC-specific survival. In addition, we found that use of rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin was associated with better survival outcomes for patients with ESCC receiving CCRT. Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship of statin use associated with lower ESCC-specific mortality.

Utility of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in resection of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A literature review and a case report.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main primary treatment for non-advanced oesophageal cancer. Conventional thoracotomy and laparotomy can result in severe trauma, slow recovery, more complications, low quality of life, and reduced survival outcomes. Laparoscopic surgery has reduced the above-mentioned problems. However, some challenges remain associated with this approach, such as lymphadenectomy, anastomotic leakage, and inadequate surgical margins. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) in combination with laparoscopic surgery, provides real-time navigation throughout the entire surgical procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: A middle-aged male patient presented to our health centre with progressive dysphagia for > 2 months. Endoscopy and biopsy revealed oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma 34 cm from the incisors (tumour node metastasis classification (TNM) T3N1M0 IIIB). ICG imaging fluorescence laparoscopic surgery was successfully performed to complete the oesophagectomy and oesophageal and tubular stomach anastomosis by accurately locating the lesion, retaining adequate upper and lower margins, visually dissecting the lymph nodes, and testing the anastomotic blood supply. The postoperative TNM stage was T2N0M0 ⅡA. The patient recovered quickly without complications. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered. After three years of follow-up, the patient had no recurrence or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence laparoscopy provides an excellent surgical treatment modality for patients with oesophageal cancer.

The contribution of smoking and smokeless tobacco to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk in the African oesophageal cancer corridor: Results from the ESCCAPE multicentre case-control studies.

Tobacco use is a well-established risk factor for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) but the extent of its contribution to the disease burden in the African oesophageal cancer corridor has not been comprehensively elucidated, including by type of tobacco use. We investigated the contribution of tobacco use (smoking and smokeless) to ESCC in Tanzania, Malawi and Kenya. Hospital-based ESCC case-control studies were conducted in the three countries. Incident cases and controls were interviewed using a comprehensive questionnaire which included questions on tobacco smoking and smokeless tobacco use. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ESCC associated with tobacco, adjusted for age, sex, alcohol use, religion, education and area of residence. One thousand two hundred seventy-nine cases and 1345 controls were recruited between August 5, 2013, and May 24, 2020. Ever-tobacco use was associated with increased ESCC risk in all countries: Tanzania (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.83-5.23), and in Malawi (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.80-3.33) and lesser in Kenya (OR 1.37, 95%CI 0.94-2.00). Exclusive smokeless tobacco use was positively associated with ESCC risk, in Tanzania, Malawi and Kenya combined (OR 1.92, 95%CI 1.26-2.92). ESCC risk increased with tobacco smoking intensity and duration of smoking. Tobacco use is an important risk factor of ESCC in Tanzania, Malawi and Kenya. Our study provides evidence that smoking and smokeless tobacco cessation are imperative in reducing ESCC risk.

Safety and efficacy analysis of chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab for treating unresectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab in the treatment of unresectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in elderly patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed 54 cases of elderly patients (aged over 70 years) with unresectable ESCC in our centre between December 2016 and November 2019. The patients were treated with a radiation dose of 50-61.6 Gy (25-30 fractions) combined with nimotuzumab for targeted therapy with or without chemotherapy according to each patient's condition. The patients were observed for quality of life, safety, side effects and survival before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Among the 54 patients, 26 were treated with nimotuzumab combined with chemoradiotherapy and 28 were treated with nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy. Toxicities were mainly oesophagitis (≥ Grade 2, 38.9%), myelosuppression (≥ Grade 3, 24.1%) and hypoproteinaemia (any grade, 94.4%). The rates of complete response, partial response, disease stability and disease progression were 11.1% (6/54), 81.5% (44/54), 3.7% (2/54) and 3.7% (2/54), respectively, and the overall objective response rate was 92.6% (50/54). The median follow-up time was 35.1 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61.1% (1 year OS) and 35.2% (2 year OS), 42.6% (1 year PFS) and 16.7% (2 year PFS), respectively. The median OS and PFS rates were 16.0 and 10.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nimotuzumab combined with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy was well tolerated in elderly patients with unresectable ESCC. This combination can achieve a good treatment response and enhance survival.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in the developing world with decreasing incidence in developed countries and carries significant morbidity and mortality. Major risk factors for ESCC development include significant use of alcohol and tobacco. Screening for ESCC can be recommended in high-risk populations living in highly endemic regions. The treatment of ESCC ranges from endoscopic resection therapy or surgery in localized disease to chemoradiotherapy in metastatic disease, and prognosis is directly related to the stage at diagnosis. New immunotherapies and molecular targeted therapies may improve the dismal survival outcomes in patients with metastatic ESCC.

Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus.

OPINION STATEMENT: Esophageal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with an increasing incidence in recent decades. The majority of esophageal cancers are squamous cell carcinoma. The 5-year survival rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor, and there remains globally a pressing need for novel treatments that improve patient outcomes and quality of life. In this review, we discuss management of localized ESCC with an update on relevant newly published literature, including targeted therapy and novel biomarkers. The standard treatment approach for locally advanced, resectable ESCC is currently chemoradiation with or without surgery. Here we discuss different approaches to endoscopic resection, surgery, and radiation therapy. Although the typical chemotherapy regimen is a combination of a platinum with a fluoropyrimidine or paclitaxel, different regimens are being evaluated. With the landscape of immunotherapy rapidly evolving, at the forefront of new treatments for ESCC is immunotherapy and other targeted agents. Ultimately, the treatment approach should be individualized to each patient.

SDF-1α predicts poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) is a chemokine associated with tumor progression in various types of cancers. The current study aimed to evaluate whether pre-treatment or kinetics of SDF-1α can predict the prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: A total of 97 patients with ESCC were identified at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2010 and December 2015. Serum concentration of SDF-1α was measured at day 0 (pre-treatment) and chemotherapy day 28 to determine its kinetics and the cut-off level of pre-chemotherapy SDF-1α was 1.5 ng/mL. Two ESCC cell lines, TE1 and KYSE30, were selected to evaluate the function of SDF-1α. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pre-treatment SDF-1α ≥ 1.5 ng/mL and an increased SDF-1α level after treatment were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (p = 0.021 and p = 0.008, respectively) and overall survival (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with pre-treatment SDF-1α ≥ 1.5 ng/mL and increased SDF-1α levels after treatment were found to have poor response to CCRT. Moreover, these cell lines were treated with chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin or 5-FU) and SDF-1α, alone or in combination. Our in vitro study results showed SDF-1α promoted the proliferation of tumor cells and overcame the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that SDF-1α plays an important role in ESCC disease progression and that pre-treatment SDF-1α level and kinetics of SDF-1α are the independent prognostic factors for ESCC patients receiving definitive CCRT. Periodic determinations of serum SDF-1α level may be valuable to predict prognosis of ESCC in clinical practice.

Tolerability and efficacy of durvalumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with tremelimumab, in patients from Asia with advanced biliary tract, esophageal, or head-and-neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Agents targeting the programmed cell death-1 pathway have demonstrated encouraging activity across multiple solid tumor types. The dose expansion phase of this phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of durvalumab monotherapy, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody) combination therapy, in patients from Asia with biliary tract cancer (BTC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Patients with advanced BTC, ESCC, or HNSCC with disease progression during or following ≥1 platinum-based therapy received durvalumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg every 4 weeks [Q4W] plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg Q4W for 4 doses, followed by durvalumab 20 mg/kg Q4W). The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included antitumor activity. RESULTS: Durvalumab monotherapy was assessed in 116 patients (median age 63.5 years, 75.9% male) of whom, 42, 42, and 32 had BTC, ESCC, or HNSCC, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 19.0%, 9.5%, and 25.0% of patients with BTC, ESCC, and HNSCC, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) was 4.8%, 7.1%, and 9.4% in BTC, ESCC, and HNSCC. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab was evaluated in 124 patients (median age 62.0 years, 79.8% male) of whom 65 had BTC and 59 had ESCC. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 23.1% and 13.6% of patients with BTC and ESCC. ORR was 10.8% and 20.3% in BTC and ESCC. There were two complete responses and 10 partial responses in ESCC, and seven partial responses in BTC. CONCLUSION: In general, durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy displayed acceptable safety profiles consistent with published literature, and also demonstrated clinical benefit, in patients from Asia with BTC, ESCC, or HNSCC with disease progression on ≥1 prior treatment. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT01938612.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

The prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC) remains poor and there are limited effective therapeutic agents for EC. Pembrolizumab monotherapy exerts clinically meaningful benefits for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with a combined positive score of ≥10. Additionally, pembrolizumab plus doublet chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced EC as first-line treatment compared with chemotherapy alone. We provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors and present important clinical data related to treatment for EC patients. In our opinion, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy should be the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EC, regardless of histology and combined positive score. Biomarker studies to identify patient populations in which immune checkpoint inhibitors are expected to show efficacy are needed.

Durvalumab and tremelimumab with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment for patients with inoperable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced ESCC received 2 cycles of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, durvalumab, and tremelimumab every 3 weeks with concurrent radiation therapy (60.2 or 64.5 grays). After completing CCRT plus immunotherapy, patients received 2 cycles of consolidative durvalumab and tremelimumab followed by durvalumab monotherapy every 4 weeks for 2 years after enrollment. Their survival outcomes were compared with those from a propensity score-matched historical control group that had received CCRT alone. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 57.5% and 75%, respectively. Compared with the historical control group (n = 75), the study population had significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.97; P = .040) and overall survival (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.98; P = .043). In the study population, patients who had PD-L1-positive tumors (n = 28) had significantly longer PFS (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.54; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.56; P = .001) compared with those who had PD-L1-negative tumors (n = 11). However, there was no difference in survival outcomes according to PD-L1 status in the historical control group, indicating a strong interaction between PD-L1-positive status and survival outcomes in the treatment groups (PFS, P for interaction = .003; overall survival, P for interaction = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab and tremelimumab with definitive CCRT had promising efficacy in patients with locally advanced ESCC. In addition, PD-L1 expression had strong predictive value in the study population.

Impact of body mass index on perioperative and oncological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The association between elevated body mass index (BMI) and perioperative and oncological outcomes among elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 526 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who underwent MIE for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2016 and December 2019. Two groups were stratified by BMI: normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m2 ) and elevated groups (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 ). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 480 elderly patients were eventually enrolled, with a mean age of 70.2 years (range: 65-87), and 185 patients were eligible for elevated BMI, with a mean BMI of 26.3 ± 1.9 kg/m2 . Compared with the normal BMI group, the elevated BMI group had prolonged operation time (261.7 ± 57.2 vs. 278.9 ± 62.7 mins, p = 0.002) and increased incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (12.2% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.006). The differences in intraoperative estimated blood loss, transfusion, new-onset arrhythmia, and conversion rates and postoperative outcomes regarding pulmonary and surgical complications, intensive care unit and 30-day readmissions, the length of hospital stay, and oncological outcomes regarding R0 dissection, and the number of dissected lymph nodes between two groups were comparable. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, there was no significant difference in both perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly patients undergoing MIE for esophageal SCC, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that elevated BMI could increase perioperative and oncological adverse outcomes.