Presurgical and Postsurgical MRI Evaluation of Osteochondral Lesions of the Foot and Ankle: A Primer.

The gold standard diagnostic imaging tool for ankle OCLs is magnetic resonance imaging, which allows precise evaluation of the articular cartilage and assessment of the surrounding soft tissue structures. Post-operative morphologic MRI assessment via MOCART scores provide semi-quantitative analysis of the repair tissue, but mixed evidence exists regarding its association with post-operative outcomes. Post-operative biochemical MRIs allow assessment of the collagen network of the articular cartilage via T2-mapping and T2∗ mapping, and assessment of the articular glycosaminoglycan content via delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1rho mapping and sodium imaging.

Free medial plantar flap connection with a posterior tibial artery flap and its modification for combined dorsal and plantar foot defects - two case reports.

Reconstruction of large soft tissue foot defects were considered a difficult issue due to weight-bearing function of the foot. The reconstruction becomes more difficult when both plantar and dorsal soft tissues are involved. The options for the reconstruction were variable, in 2016 Hao Wu et al. presented a combined flap for coverage of combined fore-foot plantar and dorsal soft tissue defects. We used combined flaps in two cases and present our experience in this article.

Application of antibiotic bone cement combined with lobulated perforator flap based on descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery in treatment of infected traumatic tissue defects of foot.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of antibiotic bone cement combined with the lobulated perforator flap based on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (d-LCFA) in the treatment of infected traumatic tissue defects in the foot, in accordance with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) concept. METHODS: From December 2019 to November 2022, 10 patients with infected traumatic tissue defects of the foot were treated with antibiotic bone cement combined with the d-LCFA lobulated perforator flap. The cohort comprised 6 males and 4 females, aged 21 to 67 years. Initial infection control was achieved through debridement and coverage with antibiotic bone cement, requiring one debridement in nine cases and two debridements in one case. Following infection control, the tissue defects were reconstructed utilizing the d-LCFA lobulated perforator flap, with the donor site closed primarily. The flap area ranged from 12 cm×6 cm to 31 cm×7 cm. Postoperative follow-up included evaluation of flap survival, donor site healing, and ambulatory function of the foot. RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 7 to 24 months, averaging 14 months. Infection control was achieved successfully in all cases. The flaps exhibited excellent survival rates and the donor site healed by first intention. Based on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, pain and function were evaluated as excellent in 3 cases, good in 5 cases, and moderate in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: The application of antibiotic bone cement combined with the d-LCFA lobulated perforator flap is an effective treatment for infected traumatic tissue defects of the foot with the advantages of simplicity, high repeatability, and precise curative effects. The application of the d-LCFA lobulated perforator flap in wound repair causes minimal damage to the donor site, shortens hospital stays, lowers medical expenses, and accelerates patient rehabilitation, aligning with the ERAS concept. Therefore, it is a practice worth promoting in clinical use.

Immediate foot reconstruction and revascularization of toes using an interposition superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flow-through flap: A case report.

Foot injuries, particularly degloving injuries, can lead to segmental loss of neurovascular structures in the toes, making simultaneous reconstruction of both the foot and toes challenging. This case report presents a technique using the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap for immediate reconstruction of the dorsal foot and revascularization of multiple toes. A 28-year-old man suffered a degloving injury on the dorsum of his foot resulting in a 9 × 6cm skin defect, open fracture dislocations, exposure of tendons, and neurovascular injury, which included a 6-7.5 cm segmental defect of the vessels supplying the first, second, and third toes leaving all three toes ischemic. Immediate reconstruction was performed by harvesting a 12.5 × 5cm SCIP flap including both the superficial and deep branches and incorporating the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV). The SCIP deep branch was used to revascularize the third and second toes and the SIEV vein graft used for the first toe. The patient recovered well, no complications were observed at the 2-year follow-up, preserving all three toes and regaining mobility. The use of the SCIP flap as a flow-through flap provides thin skin flap cover, good vessel caliber size match with digital vessels and reduces the need for vein grafts from distant sites improving surgical efficiency. These attributes make the flow-through interposition SCIP flap an excellent choice for reconstructing foot defects and revascularizing toes. We report this case to demonstrate the utility of the SCIP flap in immediate soft tissue cover and digit revascularization.

Comparison of instep and non-instep flap in the reconstruction of the weight-bearing portion of the forefoot and heel.

BACKGROUND: Instep flaps are commonly used for the reconstruction of weight-bearing areas of the foot. However, in cases of large defects or damage to the instep area, non-instep flaps such as reverse sural flaps (RSF) or free anterolateral thigh flaps (ALTF) can be employed. Previous studies have primarily focused on heel reconstruction when comparing different flaps, without considering the forefoot. This study aims to verify the clinical outcomes of these flaps and determine the appropriate donor site for weight-bearing areas of the foot including forefoot reconstruction. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 39 patients who had undergone flap reconstruction of weight-bearing area defects in the foot with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were included. The patients were categorized into two groups: Group A (n = 19) using instep flaps, and Group B (n = 20) using non-instep flap including RSFs and ALTFs. Surgical outcomes were assessed based on the success of the flap, the presence of partial necrosis, the number of additional surgeries, and complications related to the donor site. Clinical evaluation included visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the occurrence of ulcers. RESULTS: All flaps were successful, while partial necrosis occurred in one case in Group B. There were three reclosures after flap border debridement in both groups and one donor site debridement in Group A. The VAS scores during weight-bearing were 2.0 ± 1.1 and 2.2 ± 1.5 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .716). The AOFAS scores were 52.8 ± 6.8 and 50.2 ± 12.7 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .435). The occurrence of ulcers was 0.4 ± 0.9 times for Group A and 0.3 ± 0.7 times for Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = .453). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the types of flaps after reconstruction of the forefoot and hindfoot. Therefore, it is recommended to choose the appropriate flap based on factors such as the size of the defect, its location, and vascular status rather than the type of flap.

[Surgical treatment of forefoot and midfoot fractures : Minimally invasive fixation of metatarsal fractures]. / Operative Versorgung von Mittel- und Vorfußfrakturen : Minimal-invasive Osteosynthesen am Mittelfuß.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive stabilization of metatarsal fractures to enable adequate fracture healing in a correct position to restore anatomy and biomechanics of the foot. INDICATIONS: A. Dislocated diaphyseal and subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metatarsal (> 3 mm, > 10° dislocation). B. Fifth metatarsal fracture at the metadiaphyseal junction (Lawrence and Botte type III). CONTRAINDICATIONS: High grade soft tissue damage or infection at the implant insertion site. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A. Fluoroscopically assisted closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal and subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metatarsal. B. Fluoroscopically assisted wire-guided intramedullary screw fixation of fifth metatarsal fractures at the metadiaphyseal junction. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A. Mobilization with partial weight bearing (20 kg) for 6 weeks wearing a stiff sole; implant removal under local anesthesia after 6-8 weeks, followed by a free range of movement and weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT). B. Early mobilization with weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT); removal of the orthosis after 6 weeks, implant removal optional. RESULTS: A. Antegrade nailing of subcapital and shaft fractures of metatarsals II-V achieves good clinical results with low complication rates both when using prepared Kirschner wires or elastically stable intramedullary nails (ESIN). B. According to current literature, intramedullary screw osteosynthesis of proximal metatarsal V fractures of zone II and III according to Lawrence and Botte leads to faster bony healing with a lower nonunion rate compared with conservative treatment. It is recommended especially, but not only, for active athletes.

Internal Brace Fixation Technique for Lisfranc Injury: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND The Lisfranc ligament is crucial for maintaining the transverse and longitudinal arch of the foot. Owing to the disruption between the medial cuneiform bone and the base of the second metatarsal bone, the currently preferred fixation method remains controversial. Our fixation technique involves screwing one anchor to the medial and intermediate cuneiform bones and using the anchor to carry the ligament to bind the Lisfranc joint and first and second metatarsal joints altogether for elastic fixation. This study evaluated the clinical and functional outcomes of InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 58 patients who underwent InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury between January 2019 and September 2022 by an experienced surgeon. One-way analysis of variance or t test was used. Preoperative classification was performed according to the Myerson classification with imaging data. Postoperative follow-up was performed based on intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Tegner score, and complications. RESULTS Surgery was completed in all patients, and follow-up was performed. The patients' ages ranged from 19 to 62 years (average: 34.6±9.4 years). The postoperative follow-up time was 12-24 months (average: 16.9±3.0 months). The average time for fracture healing was 12.8±3.0 (10-24) weeks. The VAS, AOFAS, and Tegner scores significantly improved postoperatively (from 5.33±1.0 (3-7) to 1.24±0.57 (0-2); 28.02±6.70 (18-51) to 91.59±4.76 (82-96); and 2.40±0.67 (1-4) to 6.53±0.54 (6-7), respectively), which was statistically significant (P<0.01), and the good rate of AOFAS was 91.4%. The postoperative complications were traumatic arthritis, incision infection, and temporary dorsal foot numbness, which gradually recovered. No other rejection reactions or Lisfranc fracture/dislocations recurrence occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS InternalBrace fixation for Lisfranc injury is beneficial for restoring Lisfranc joint stability and function and allows for early and more aggressive rehabilitation for patients, with fewer surgical complications.

[Lisfranc injuries]. / Verletzungen des Lisfranc-Gelenks.

Lisfranc injuries are rare but severe injuries of the foot. They range from ligament sprain to complex fracture dislocations. Etiologically, a distinction is made between indirect and direct force and between high-energy and low-energy trauma. Inadequate diagnostics (injuries overlooked or misinterpreted) can lead to painful posttraumatic osteoarthritis, chronic instability and deformity of the foot. A fracture, malalignment and unclear findings in conventional radiological diagnostics necessitate computed tomography imaging including 3D reconstruction. Lisfranc injuries are often associated with accompanying pathologies of the foot that also need to be addressed. Only stable non-displaced fractures can be treated conservatively. Depending on the injury pattern, surgical treatment is performed percutaneously, minimally invasive or open. The prognosis following Lisfranc injury is determined by the severity of damage and the quality of reconstruction.

U-Turn Design Metatarsal Artery Flap: Reliable Solution in Distal Forefoot Defect.

BACKGROUND: In distal forefoot defect, finding wound closure is challenging because of the distal site and small blood vessels involved. One possible resolution is the utilization of a metatarsal artery flap in a 'U-turn' design. This method offers several advantages, including its long length and a viable option for distal forefoot defect. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with forefoot injuries from metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint to distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint due to trauma were consecutively recruited and completed the study. Outcomes were analyzed descriptively, and risk prediction modeling for edge necrosis was performed. RESULTS: The mean ± SD follow-up time was 27.3 months ±1.9. The median (IQR) MTP-to-DIP joint wound width and length were 1.8 (1.4, 3.0) and 3.2 cm (2.9, 6.2), respectively. The median (IQR) width, length, and width-to-length ratio flap dimensions were 3.6 (2.8, 6.0), 4.7 cm (4.3, 9.3), and 1.5 (1.2, 1.7), respectively. The mean ± SD operative time was 32.9 min ± 5.7. The median (IQR) intraoperative blood loss was 5.0 mL (4.0, 5.0). The mean ± SD hospital length of stay postoperatively was 4.0 days ±1.0. The mean ± SD Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and Foot Function Index were 64.1 ± 2.5 and 7.8% ± 3.3, respectively. All patients had good or excellent aesthetic satisfaction. Spontaneously resolving edge necrosis occurred in 13.9%. The mean ± SD time-to-start-ambulation was 1.7 weeks ±0.5. At the 2-year follow-up visit, all patients had reduced U-turn flap pivot point redundancy without shoe size impact, needing reoperation, or donor site morbidity. Edge necrosis was significantly associated with length-to-width ratio ( P = 0.014) but not with Foot and Ankle Outcome Score or Foot Function Index. CONCLUSIONS: Metatarsal artery flap of U-turn design was reliable and was associated with a short recovery time, alternative resolution for forefoot area due to short operation time, minimal blood loss, short hospital length of stay, and excellent availability.

Reconstruction of the extensor tendon on the dorsal pedis with a chimeric skin-aponeurosis flap from the groin region.

BACKGROUND: Complex defects involving the extensor tendon on the dorsal pedis have been reconstructed using multiple procedures. Skin coverage and tendon transfers have also been performed. This study aimed to present our experience using a chimeric skin-aponeurosis flap for one-stage reconstruction of composite soft-tissue defects on the dorsal pedis. METHODS: Between May 2017 and September 2020, 12 patients with these defects received total treatment using a chimeric groin flap. Based on the superficial circumflex iliac vessels, the skin paddle resurfaced the cutaneous defect, and the vascularised external oblique aponeurosis was rolled to form a tendon-like structure to simultaneously replace the absent segment of the extensor tendons. A suitable "Y" bifurcation was dissected to enlarge the vessel diameter. Single-stage reconstruction was performed using a set of vascular anastomoses at the recipient site. RESULTS: Flap survival was achieved without significant complications. The hammertoe deformity was completely removed. The average dimension of the skin paddle was 8.0 × 13.0 cm (range, 6.5 × 11.0-10.0 × 14.0 cm), and the mean size of the aponeurosis was 8.0 × 4.0 cm (range, 6.0 × 3.0-10.0 × 5.0 cm). At the last follow-up visit, no morbidity was observed at the donor site. Natural shapes and walking functions were successfully achieved with a protective sensation. CONCLUSION: The chimeric groin flap with sheets of external oblique aponeurosis is a great candidate for one-stage reconstruction of composite soft tissue loss on the dorsal pedis. This approach provides cosmetic coverage, allowing faster wound healing and reduced tendon adhesions.

Outcomes and Complications of Sole Reconstruction Using Lateral Thoracic Free Tissue Transfer.

BACKGROUND: The complex structure of the sole of the foot makes the repair of extensive defects challenging. The present study, therefore, aimed to address a gap in current research by evaluating the potential of the lateral thoracic free flap, including perforator options and chimeric configurations, to be used as an advanced solution for comprehensive sole reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the following data from the charts of patients with sole defects, due to various causes, who underwent lateral thoracic free tissue transfers: patient demographics; etiologies; comorbidities; flap types and dimensions; pedicle length; operative time; follow-up period; complications; and management. RESULTS: The present study included 54 patients who underwent lateral thoracic free tissue transfer, citing infection, trauma, tumor, and posttraumatic sequelae as the major etiologies. We used the following techniques for the reconstruction of sole defects: thoracodorsal artery perforator free flap (83.3%); latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous free flap (1.9%); and various chimeric pattern flaps (14.8%). Free tissue transfer in the lateral thoracic region offers versatility for reconstruction, as well as low donor site morbidity. Complications observed in the present study included wound dehiscence (9.3%), partial necrosis (9.3%), and pressure ulcers (22.2%), although most patients healed favorably without flap loss. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral thoracic free flap is a viable option for the reconstruction of the sole of the foot and allows for the effective reconstruction of complex defects. It contains a sustainable skin paddle, and multiple components can be easily included as a chimeric type. Further studies should seek to identify ways to prevent pressure ulcers, which was the only known long-term complication in the present study.

Navicular and Cuboid Fractures.

Navicular and cuboid fractures can be complex and difficult to treat. Depending on the mechanism of injury, diagnosis of such fractures is not always possible with conventional radiographs due to the irregularity and overlap of the midfoot bones. Advanced imaging is indicated if a fracture is of high suspicion or to further characterize a displaced fracture. Cuboid and navicular fractures can occur in isolation but are often associated with other midfoot injuries due to their anatomic relationships. Typically, nondisplaced fractures can be treated conservatively, whereas displaced fractures require surgical intervention to prevent future complications.

Use of MatriDerm with Split-Thickness Skin Graft in Post-traumatic Full-Thickness Wound Defects in Orthopedic Cases: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.

The management of complex and severe lower-extremity injuries is challenging for the orthopedic surgeon. When the primary or secondary closure of the defect is not feasible, complex procedures with graft (split-thickness or full-thickness) or flap (pedicled or free) are required. These procedures are performed by specialized plastic surgeons and are at high risk for adverse effects, even high morbidity among both the donor and acceptor sites. Furthermore, split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) often lead to unsatisfactory results in terms of mechanical stability, flexibility, and aesthetics due to the lack of underlying dermal tissue. Consequently, dermal substitutes, such as MatriDerm (MedSkin Solutions Dr Suwelack AG, Billerbeck, Germany), have been proposed and further developed as a treatment option addressing the management of full-thickness wound defects in conjunction with STSGs. We aimed to present a case of post-traumatic full-thickness wound defect of the left foot after traumatic amputation of the digits that was treated with MatriDerm combined with autologous STSG. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature to delineate the efficacy of the use of MatriDerm combined with STSGs in orthopedic cases exclusively.

[Application of three-dimensional ultrasound technique in repairing dorsal foot wounds with medial sural artery perforator flaps].

Objective: To investigate the accuracy of positioning perforator of medial sural artery with three-dimensional ultrasound technique guided by a wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe before operation, and the effectiveness of the flap design based on this in repairing the dorsal foot wounds. Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2022, 30 patients with skin and soft tissue defects of the dorsal foot were treated. There were 19 males and 11 females, with an average age of 43.9 years (range, 22-63 years). There were 12 cases of traffic accident injury, 15 cases of heavy crushing injury, and 3 cases of machine injury. The time from injury to hospitalization was 1-8 hours (mean, 3.5 hours). The wounds in size of 5 cm×3 cm to 17 cm×5 cm were thorough debrided and covered with vacuum sealing drainage dressing. Then the wounds were repaired with the medial sural artery perforator flaps after no obvious infection observed. To obtain the complete three-dimensional image, the number and position of the medial sural artery perforator branches and the position of the main blood vessels in the muscle were detected and recorded by wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe before operation. Suitable perforating branches were selected to design the flap and guide the flap incision on this basis. The size of the perforating flap ranged from 6 cm×4 cm to 18 cm×6 cm. The sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated by comparing preoperative exploration with intraoperative observation of perforating branches, so as to evaluate the positioning accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound technique. The donor sites were sutured directly in 25 cases and repaired with free skin grafting in 5 cases. Results: The 60 perforating branches of medial sural artery were found before operation and 58 during operation in 30 patients. Among them, pre- and intra-operative perforations were consistent with 56. The sensitivity was 93.3% and positive predictive value was 96.6%. The intramuscular position and route of the main blood vessels were basically consistent with the pre- and intra-operative observation. All flaps survived and wounds healed by first intention. All incisions at the donor sites healed by first intention, and all skin grafts survived. All patients were follow up 9-24 months (mean, 14.7 months). The appearance, color, and texture of the flaps were good, and no obvious effect on wearing shoes and walking. At last follow-up, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind score ranged from 80 to 92, with an average of 87.5. The patient satisfaction was excellent in 29 cases and good in 1 case. Conclusion: The three-dimensional ultrasound technique guided by the wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe can accurately locate the perforating branch of the medial sural artery, and the three-dimensional imaging is more intuitive, which can be used to guide the design and incision of the medial sural artery perforator flap.

Fixation with multiple K-wires and PRP injection as an effective way to manage heel pad avulsion.

The treatment of acute heel pad avulsion differs significantly from managing other soft tissue injuries due to its unique soft tissue structure. This case report outlines a scenario involving a male in his 20s who suffered heel pad avulsion without a calcaneal fracture but with an ipsilateral medial malleolus fracture after a twisting injury to the ankle caused by a road traffic accident. Immediate action was taken within 24 hours of the injury, involving thorough debridement of the wound, fixation to the calcaneum using multiple K-wires, primary suturing and internal fixation of the medial malleolus with two cannulated cancellous screws. Postoperative care included PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injections into the wound twice, removal of K-wires after 6 weeks and allowing walking with full weight bearing after 8 weeks. A year later, the wound had completely healed, and the patient was comfortably walking pain-free with full weight-bearing capabilities.

Lisfranc Injuries.

Lisfranc injuries were thought to primarily occur during high-energy events, leading to a preference for fusion treatment; however, recent data have shifted this perspective by highlighting a greater occurrence of low-energy injuries and reshaping the focus on open reduction internal fixation. This multifaceted process is guided by various factors, including the nature of the injury, specific anatomic considerations, and the involved joints. Our overarching goal remains to achieve anatomic reduction, with flexibility in hardware fixation methods. In cases of comminution, bridge plating may be warranted, potentially followed by arthrodesis in the future.

Soft Tissue Coverage for Foot and Ankle Trauma.

Lower extremity trauma can result in extensive soft tissue loss, which can require a staged multispecialty approach. Flaps can be an excellent choice for significant soft tissue loss. A variety of variables goes into the selection of a flap including understanding what the recipient site needs, available donor sites, nature of trauma, and utilization of indices to predict limb salvageability in order to strategically select the correct flap option.

Pediatric foot fractures on radiographs: distribution and predictors of surgery.

PURPOSE: To examine the distribution and characteristics of pediatric foot fractures on radiographs with respect to age and skeletal maturation, and to identify predictors of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included children (≤ 18 years) with foot fractures, who underwent radiographic examinations (2020-2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and clinical data. Fracture characteristics, including anatomic location, presence of displacement, angulation, articular involvement, and, if skeletally immature, physeal involvement and Salter-Harris fracture pattern were collected. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of surgery. RESULTS: 1,090 (596-boys, 494-girls; mean age, 11.0 ± 4.0 years) patients with 1,325 (59.8% metatarsal, 33.8% phalangeal, and 6.4% tarsal) fractures were included. Fractures of 1st metatarsal were more common among younger children whereas fractures of 2nd-4th and 5th metatarsals were more common among older children (median ages: 5.9 years vs. 10.3 years and 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Intra-articular fractures were more common among maturing and mature than immature bones (25.3% and 20.4% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001). Physeal involvement was uncommon (162/977, 16.6%) and the most common pattern was Salter-Harris type II (133/162, 82.1%). A minority (47/1090, 4.3%) of patients required surgery and independent predictors of surgery included physeal involvement (OR = 5.12, 95% CI: 2.48-10.39, p < 0.001), multiple fractures (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.67-8.53, p = 0.001), fracture displacement (OR = 9.16, 95% CI:4.43-19.07, p < 0.001), and articular involvement (OR = 2.72, 95% CI:1.27-5.72, p = 0.008). Using these predictors, the likelihood for surgery ranged between 8.0% with 1 and 86.7% with 3 predictors. CONCLUSION: Pediatric foot fracture patterns differed based on age and regional skeletal maturation. Physeal involvement, multiple fractures, fracture displacement, and articular involvement were independent predictors of surgery in our study group.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus whether the primary surgical method should be open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA) for Lisfranc injuries. The aim of our randomized controlled trial was to compare ORIF and PA for displaced Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: This study was a national multicenter randomized controlled trial. Altogether 43 displaced Lisfranc injuries were enrolled in this trial. The primary outcome measure was Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) at a 24-months follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were VAS-FA pain, function, and other complaints subscales and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Scale. All outcomes were measured at 6, 12, and 24 months. We were unable to reach the planned sample size of 60 patients; thus, the study remains underpowered. RESULTS: The mean VAS-FA Overall score in the ORIF group was 86.5 (95% CI 77.9, 95.1) and 80.1 (95% CI 72.0, 88.1) in the PA group at the 24-month follow-up. We did not find eligible evidence of a difference in VAS-FA Overall scores (mean between-group difference 6.5 [95% CI -5.3, 18.2], Cohen d = 0.100). CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence of a difference in VAS-FA between ORIF and PA in patients with displaced Lisfranc injuries, and thus both are viable options for the initial surgical method. The trial is underpowered; however, the data may be included in a meta-analysis of similarly designed randomized controlled trials.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953067 24 October 2016.

Do Transtibial Amputations Outperform Amputations of the Hind- and Midfoot Following Severe Limb Trauma?: A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 18-month clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients with severe lower-limb injuries treated with a transtibial amputation or a hind- or midfoot amputation. Despite the theoretical benefits of hind- and midfoot-level amputation, we hypothesized that patients with transtibial amputations would report better function and have fewer complications. METHODS: The study included patients 18 to 60 years of age who were treated with a transtibial amputation (n = 77) or a distal amputation (n = 17) and who were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Foot Trauma (OUTLET) study. The primary outcome was the difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, and secondary outcomes included pain, complications, amputation revision, and amputation healing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with distal versus transtibial amputation in any of the domains of the SMFA: dysfunction index [distal versus transtibial], 31.2 versus 22.3 (p = 0.13); daily activities, 37.3 versus 26.0 (p = 0.17); emotional status, 41.4 versus 29.3 (p = 0.07); mobility, 36.5 versus 27.8 (p = 0.20); and bother index, 34.4 versus 23.6 (p = 0.14). Rates of complications requiring revision were higher for distal amputations but not significantly so (23.5% versus 13.3%; p = 0.28). One distal and no transtibial amputees required revision to a higher level (p = 0.18). A higher proportion of patients with distal compared with transtibial amputation required local surgical revision (17.7% versus 13.3%; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the distal and transtibial groups in scores on the Brief Pain Index at 18 months post-injury. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complication rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent transtibial versus hind- or midfoot amputation for severe lower-extremity injury. The average SMFA scores were higher (worse), although not significantly different, for patients undergoing distal compared with transtibial amputation, and more patients with distal amputation had a complication requiring surgical revision. Of note, more patients with distal amputation required closure with an atypical flap, which likely contributed to less favorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.