Causal association between hyperthyroidism and risk of gastroesophageal reflux or esophageal cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization investigation.

Background: Emerging observational studies indicated an association between hyperthyroidism and gastrointestinal disorders. However, it remains unclear whether this association is causal, particularly in the case of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) and esophageal cancer. Methods: To assess the potential causal relationship between hyperthyroidism and GERD or esophageal cancer, we conducted a bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization study. Independent genetic instruments for hyperthyroidism from the UK Biobank (N case=3,545 and N control=459,388) and public genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset (N case=3,731 and N control=480,867) were used to investigate the association with esophageal cancer in the UK Biobank study (N case=740 and N control=372,016) and GERD in the public GWAS database (N case=20,381 and N control=464,217). Four different approaches (inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted mode, MR-Egger, and weighted median regression) were used to ensure that our results more reliable. Additional sensitivity analyses were also performed to validate our results. Results: When hyperthyroidism was considered as the exposure factor, it appeared to act as a protective factor for GERD (ORIVW = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.99, P = 0.039), while as a risk factor for esophageal cancer (ORIVW = 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06, P = 0.003). However, there is no evidence supporting a reverse causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to hyperthyroidism and GERD or esophageal cancer. Conclusion: Our findings provided genetic evidence supporting bidirectional causal relationships between hyperthyroidism and GERD or esophageal cancer. These results substantiate certain discoveries from previous observational studies on a causal level and provide insight into relevant genetic susceptibility factors.

Genetic evidence causally linking gastroesophageal reflux disease to cholecystitis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and cholecystitis share overlapping symptoms, including belching, acid reflux, and heartburn. Despite this, the causal relationship between these two conditions remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between GERD and cholecystitis using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. METHODS: A two-sample MR analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger method to assess the causal effects of GERD on the cholecystitis risk. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on GERD (N cases = 129080; N controls = 473524) and cholecystitis (N cases = 1930; N controls =359264) were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS project. Various techniques were employed to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seventy-seven single nucleotide polymorphisms from GERD GWASs were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The primary IVW method revealed a significant association between GERD and an increased risk of cholecystitis (odds ratio = 1.004; 95% confidence interval = 1.003-1.005, p = 2.68 × 10- 9). The absence of heterogeneity and pleiotropy in the data supports the reliability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: GERD was positively associated with the risk of cholecystitis. This study provides insights into potential avenues for the development of prevention strategies and treatment options for cholecystitis in patients with GERD. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between GERD and cholecystitis.

Sleep Disorders Affecting Prognosis of Dental Treatment.

This study provided an overview of the knowledge on the main sleep-related disorders and conditions affecting the prognosis of dental treatment: sleep bruxism (SB), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Current scientific evidence seems to suggest that these phenomena (ie, SB, OSA, GERD) belong to a circle of mutually relating sleep disorders and conditions where dental practitioners can play a key role in diagnosis and treatment.

Postoperative laryngeal granuloma in mediastinal goitre with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Reported postoperative complications of mediastinal goitre include recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, hypoparathyroidism and tracheomalacia. Voice and swallowing symptoms after thyroid surgery have been associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux, but it is unclear whether the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the oesophagus, larynx and pharynx worsens after thyroid surgery. We present the case of a man in his 40s with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who developed heartburn and laryngeal granuloma after total thyroidectomy for mediastinal goitre. Vonoprazan therapy effectively controlled these symptoms. Although the exact cause remains unclear, we suggest that changes in pressure dynamics after thyroidectomy may worsen the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the oesophagus, larynx and pharynx, contributing to GERD symptoms and laryngeal granuloma. This case highlights the need to consider the management of retrograde flow of gastric contents into the oesophagus, larynx and pharynx in the postoperative care of mediastinal goitre resections.

24 h combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in children with chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough in children is closely related to gastroesophageal reflux (GER). However, this association has not been adequately studied due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) monitoring is considered the most accurate method for evaluating the association between symptoms and reflux, but data on its use in children with chronic cough are still lacking. We aimed to assess the association between chronic cough and GER in children through MII-pH monitoring. METHODS: Children with chronic cough (> 4 weeks) who were suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) were selected to undergo 24 h MII-pH monitoring at our hospital. Patients were divided into groups according to their age, body position, reflux index (RI) or total reflux events, and the differences between the groups were analyzed. Then the significance and value of 24 h pH and impedance monitoring in chronic cough and the relationship between chronic cough and reflux were discussed. RESULTS: Overall, 426 patients were included. The median age was 12 months (interquartile range: 6-39.5 months), 129 (30.3%) patients had RI > 7% detected by pH-metry, and 290 (68.1%) patients had positive diagnosis based on the impedance data. GER predominantly occurred in the upright position and mostly involved weakly acidic reflux and mixed gas-liquid reflux. There were 14.1% of children in non-acid GER group were SAP positive showing no difference in acid GER group 13.2% (P = 0.88), whereas patients with SAP > 95% in MII positive group (47[16.2%]) is higher than in MII negative group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Twenty four hour MII-pH monitoring is safe, well tolerated in children, but also has a higher detection rate of gastroesophageal reflux. It can find identify weakly acidic reflux, weakly alkaline reflux and reflux events with different physical properties, which can explain the relationship between GER and chronic cough more comprehensively. It provides new approach for exploring the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of children with chronic cough.

Endoscopic Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex inflammatory condition affecting the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been implicated as a potential exacerbating factor in CRS, but the specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in this context remain poorly understood. Background and Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a multifactorial disease with various underlying etiologies, including inflammation, anatomical factors, and environmental triggers. While gastroesophageal reflux disease has been suggested as a potential contributor to chronic rhinosinusitis, the specific endoscopic features indicative of nasopharyngeal pathology in CRS patients with GERD symptoms have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim is to identify specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms and to propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 521 adult patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of CRS. From this cohort, 95 patients with the highest scores on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) questionnaires were selected as the main group. Endoscopic examinations were performed to assess the nasal and nasopharyngeal mucosa. Results: Our study revealed significant alterations in the nasopharyngeal mucosa of patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms. Increased vascularity of the nasopharyngeal mucosa was observed in 91 patients (95.7%), while hypertrophy was noted in 83 patients (87.4%). Mucus was present in the nasopharynx of 77 patients (81.1%), exhibiting varying characteristics of color and consistency. Asymmetric hypertrophy of the oropharyngeal mucosa was noted in 62 patients (65.3%). Conclusions: We propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx, which may aid in diagnostic and management decisions. Further research is warranted to explore the potential impact of GERD symptoms on the course and severity of CRS exacerbations.

Investigation of pepsin levels in bronchial lavage in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic cough.

AIM: Pepsin is an enzyme that helps digest protein secreted only from the gastric chief cell in an inactive state. Pepsin is a good marker for acidic gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Its presence in sputum or saliva is considered pathologic. In GER, cough is stimulated by broncho-esophageal neurogenic reflex and aspiration of gastric contents into the airways. GER is the most common cause of cough. Gastric acid reflux is also thought to play a role in Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) etiology. In many studies, pepsin and bile acid levels in bronchial lavage were high in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic cough. In our study, we aimed to evaluate pepsin levels in bronchial lavage in patients with ILD and chronic cough and to investigate the relationship between symptoms and reflux treatment. METHODS: Between January 2021 and February 2022, 212 patients who underwent bronchoscopy in our tertiary clinic were evaluated. These patients were divided into three groups: 52 patients with interstitial lung disease, 81 patients with chronic cough, and 79 patients who underwent bronchoscopy with a pre-diagnosis of lung cancer as the control group. Bronchial lavage obtained by bronchoscopy was analyzed for pepsin levels. RESULTS: Shortness of breath and cough were the most common symptoms in all three groups. Pepsin levels were 16.71 ± 8.6 ng/ml in the chronic cough group, 15.6 ± 8.9 ng/ml in the ILD group, and 10.58 ± 5.4 ng/ml in the lung cancer (control) group. Pepsin levels in the ILD and chronic cough group were statistically significantly higher than in the lung cancer group (p:0.00). There was no statistical difference between the ILD group and the chronic cough group regarding pepsin levels. It was found that pepsin levels were lower in the three groups who received anti-reflux treatment. There was no difference in pepsin levels between ILD subgroups. CONCLUSION: Pepsin levels in bronchial lavage were higher in the ILD and chronic cough groups. This suggests that reflux may be involved in the etiology of chronic cough and ILD. Low pepsin values in patients receiving anti-reflux therapy have shown that occult reflux may occur. In our study, the high level of pepsin in bronchial lavage, especially in the chronic cough and ILD group, may be instructive in the etiology and treatment planning of the disease.

Chronic Cough: Evaluation and Management.

Chronic cough is a cough lasting longer than 8 weeks in adults and 4 weeks in children. In the United States, more than 12.3 million individuals are estimated to have chronic cough. The most common causes of chronic cough in adults are upper airway cough syndrome, asthma, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and laryngopharyngeal reflux. The initial assessment of chronic cough should include cost-effective diagnostic tests, such as chest radiography and spirometry, and empiric and targeted treatment for the most common etiologies. An assessment of medications (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), environment, occupation, and potential chemical triggers should be conducted. For chronic refractory cough, physiotherapy and speech and language therapy combined with a trial of gabapentin or amitriptyline can be considered. When initial test findings are unremarkable, further diagnostic tests, such as bronchoscopy and nasendoscopy, are often warranted through referral to a pulmonologist and otolaryngologist. Common etiologies in children include protracted bacterial bronchitis, asthma, bronchiectasis, upper airway cough syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Because of the high likelihood of spontaneous resolution, children with a dry cough without wheezing or exertional dyspnea may be observed for 2 weeks.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that occurs when reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus causes symptoms and/or complications. The prevalence of GERD in Western societies has been estimated at 30%, making it one of the most commonly encountered disorders in primary care. The spectrum of GERD includes typical symptoms of esophageal reflux (heartburn and/or regurgitation); esophageal injury (erosive esophagitis; stricture; Barrett esophagus; and, rarely, adenocarcinoma); and extraesophageal symptoms, such as hoarseness and chronic cough. Proper diagnosis and treatment of GERD includes symptom control, exclusion of other disorders, avoiding overuse of medications and invasive testing, and minimizing complications.

Patient-reported symptoms and burden of eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence from real-world clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus. This real-world study used patient and physician surveys to describe the clinical characteristics and disease burden of eosinophilic esophagitis-overall and in a subgroup of patients with dysphagia despite treatment. METHODS: Data analyzed in this study were collected in 2020 from US and EU patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 12 years with a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis, had an esophageal count of ≥ 15 eosinophils/high-power field at diagnosis, and were currently prescribed treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis. RESULTS: Overall, 1001 patients were included, of whom 356 (36%) had dysphagia despite treatment. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. The severity of eosinophilic esophagitis was mild in more patients overall (69%) versus those with dysphagia despite treatment (48%). Patient disease history was similar in both populations, with some exceptions: common patient-reported symptoms were dysphagia (70% and 86%) and heartburn/acid reflux (55% and 49%), and common physician-reported symptoms were dysphagia (75% and 91%) and food impaction (46% and 52%). Treatment history was similar in both populations; overall, the most common treatments were proton pump inhibitors (83%) and topical corticosteroids (51%). Patients reported slightly more days with symptoms, higher impacts on activities of daily living, and slightly higher anxiety or depression in the dysphagia-despite-treatment population versus the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic esophagitis presents severe symptoms and comorbidities that substantially impact patients' well-being and quality of life. Greater awareness of and novel treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis are needed.

Unraveling the causality between gastroesophageal reflux disease and increased cancer risk: evidence from the UK Biobank and GWAS consortia.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition characterized by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. Despite its widespread prevalence worldwide, the causal link between GERD and various cancer risks has not been fully established, and past medical research has often underestimated or overlooked this relationship. METHODS: This study performed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between GERD and 19 different cancers. We leveraged data from 129,080 GERD patients and 473,524 controls, along with cancer-related data, obtained from the UK Biobank and various Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) consortia. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GERD were used as instrumental variables, utilizing methods such as inverse variance weighting, weighted median, and MR-Egger to address potential pleiotropy and confounding factors. RESULTS: GERD was significantly associated with higher risks of nine types of cancer. Even after adjusting for all known risk factors-including smoking, alcohol consumption, major depression, and body mass index (BMI)-these associations remained significant, with higher risks for most cancers. For example, the adjusted risk for overall lung cancer was (OR, 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14-1.33), for lung adenocarcinoma was (OR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), for lung squamous cell carcinoma was (OR, 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19-1.53), and for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer was (OR, 1.73; 95% CI: 1.22-2.44). Especially noteworthy, the risk for esophageal cancer increased to (OR, 2.57; 95% CI: 1.23-5.37). Mediation analyses further highlighted GERD as a significant mediator in the relationships between BMI, smoking, major depression, and cancer risks. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a significant causal relationship between GERD and increased cancer risk, highlighting its role in cancer development and underscoring the necessity of incorporating GERD management into cancer prevention strategies.

Review article: Oesophageal disorders in chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease are common worldwide and significantly impact quality of life. The intricate link between these conditions, including how oesophageal disorders like GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal cancer affect and are affected by chronic liver disease, remains poorly understood. AIMS: To review the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, evaluating epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic factors. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis, using the PubMed database RESULTS: Oesophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal cancer, oesophageal motor disorders and oesophageal candidiasis are prevalent among individuals with cirrhosis, exacerbating the burden of liver disease. These diseases have a multifaceted symptomatology and pathogenic basis, posing a significant challenge in cirrhotic patients that necessitates careful diagnosis and management. Additionally, therapies frequently used for these diseases, such as proton pump inhibitors, require careful consideration in cirrhotic patients due to potential adverse effects and altered pharmacokinetics. Managing oesophageal disorders in cirrhotic patients requires a cautious approach due to possible interactions with medications and the risk of adverse effects. Furthermore, symptoms associated with these conditions are often exacerbated by common interventions in patients with cirrhosis, such as band ligation for oesophageal varices. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal disorders are common in cirrhosis and increase the disease burden. These conditions require careful management due to complex symptoms and treatment risks. Proton pump inhibitors and other therapies must be used cautiously, as cirrhosis interventions can worsen symptoms.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux: rare presentation of Sotos syndrome in a neonate.

Sotos syndrome is a disorder characterised by distinctive facial features, excessive growth during childhood and intellectual disability. While these criteria apply to children and adults, they fall short when applied to neonates. Hyperbilirubinaemia, large for gestational age, hypotonia and seizures, along with cardiac and renal anomalies, are known to be common presentations in neonates. Reports have also added hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia as a presenting feature of Sotos syndrome in neonates. Here, we report a case of Sotos syndrome in a neonate who presented in the neonatal period with recurrent apnoeic episodes with hypotonia, which were later attributed to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Crosstalk between gastrointestinal tract disorders and obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Clinical studies suggested associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and gastrointestinal tract disorders. This study aims to investigate the genetic causal relationship between OSA and gastrointestinal tract disorders, specifically gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: In this study, we employed two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the potential relationships between OSA and GERD, and between OSA and IBD. More specifically, the primary analysis utilized inverse variance weighting (IVW). Weighted median, MR Egger, and MR PRESSO were applied to complicate potential violations of MR assumptions. Also, sensitivity analysis was evaluated and similar analysis was performed again after outliers were removed. Additionally, multivariable MR (MVMR) was conducted for associated pairs to adjust for obesity. RESULTS: Genetically predicted risk of GERD increased OSA risk by approximately 60% (ORIVW = 1.62, 95%CI = [1.43,1.84]) which was also stable by other complicated approaches, and even with BMI adjusted by MVMR (ORadjBMI[95%CI] = 1.26 [1.15,1.37]). Besides, OSA showed a mild causal effect on increased GERD risk after adjusting for obesity (ORadjBMI[95%CI] = 1.05 [1.02,1.08]). Additionally, OSA increased the risks for IBD (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.36 [1.12,1.65]), including a higher risk of CD (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.41 [1.08,1.83]), and a trend for increasing UC risk (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.29 [0.99,1.67]). CONCLUSION: GERD exerts a substantial causality on increasing the risk of OSA. Conversely, the potential for a causal relationship that OSA contributes to the development of GERD or IBD remains probable. These findings support the crosstalk between gastrointestinal tract disorders and OSA.

Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Screening in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: Correlating the Findings with GERD symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: The role of routine preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in bariatric surgery candidates is controversial. This study compares preoperative EGD outcomes with patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms to determine if a case-based EGD is appropriate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2022 through September 2023 in Mashhad, Iran. All patients underwent EGD. To assess GERD symptoms, we used the GERD-Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire. Patients were categorized into two groups: the asymptomatic group (GERD-HRQL = 0) and the symptomatic group (GERD-HRQL > 0). RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included, out of which 133 (80.6%) were in the symptomatic group and 32 (19.4%) were in the asymptomatic group. Esophagitis was present in 41 (24.8%) patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of esophagitis (18.8% vs. 26.3%, p-value = 0.37), hiatal hernia (18.8% vs. 18.8%, p-value = 1.00), gastritis (56.3% vs. 63.9%, p-value = 0.42), and H. pylori infection (9.4% vs. 12.0%, p-value = 1.00) between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, respectively. None of the demographic factors or comorbidities of asymptomatic patients were associated with esophagitis, except for hiatal hernia (OR = 7.67, 95% CI 3.01-19.53, p-value < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the GERD-HRQL total scores, as well as the heartburn and regurgitation subscales, were poor predictors of esophagitis (AUC 0.57, 0.51, and 0.56, respectively). CONCLUSION: EGD findings were not associated with GERD symptoms in candidates for bariatric surgery.

Exposures and coexisting conditions in pediatric nodular tracheobronchitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of coexisting conditions and exposures in children with nodular tracheobronchitis diagnosed by flexible bronchoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 100 children diagnosed with nodular tracheobronchitis by flexible bronchoscopy between 2012 and 2023. RESULTS: Common coexisting diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, 50%), dysphagia/aspiration (40%), asthma (30%), recurrent croup (30%), tracheostomy dependence (19%) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EOE) (12%). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) demonstrated cellular inflammation with elevated proportions of neutrophils in 63%, and lymphocytes in 24%. Among 88 patients in whom bacterial cultures were performed, 52% were positive, with Moraxella, Haemophilus, Streptococcal and Pseudomonas species predominating. Among 30 patients who underwent viral testing, 57% were positive, with rhinovirus (82%) and adenovirus (29%) predominating. Patients with neutrophilic inflammation were more likely to have a positive respiratory bacterial culture and/or viral polymerase chain reaction (p = 0.003, 0.005). Evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract included 79 patients with a history of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 45 patients with a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS), and 45 patients with multi-channel intraluminal impedance and pH testing. The majority of VFSS were abnormal (60%) demonstrating either laryngeal penetration (33%) or intratracheal aspiration (27%). Median pH reflux and impedance proximal reflux indices were 3.8% and 0.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: Potential contributing factors in the pathophysiology of nodular tracheobronchitis include bacterial and viral infections, GERD, dysphagia/aspiration, and EOE. When nodular tracheobronchitis is observed during bronchoscopy, further evaluation to assess for these conditions should be considered.

Medium-term outcomes after magnetic sphincter augmentation vs. fundoplication for reflux disease due to hiatal hernia: a propensity-score matched comparison in 282 patients.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of reflux patients opt for magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) instead of fundoplication. However, few studies compare the medium-term efficacy and safety of the procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive MSA and Nissen fundoplication cases between 01/2015 and 06/2020. Patients underwent surgery, including hiatoplasty, for medical treatment-resistant reflux due to hiatal hernia. Surgical revision and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reuptake rates were the primary outcomes. We also compared adverse event rates. Patients with severe preoperative dysphagia/motility disorders were assigned different treatment pathways and excluded from the analysis. We used propensity-score matching to reduce confounding between treatments. RESULTS: Out of 411 eligible patients, 141 patients who underwent MSA and 141 with fundoplication had similar propensity scores and were analyzed. On average, patients were 55 ± 12 years old and overweight (BMI: 28 ± 5). At 3.9 years of mean follow-up, MSA was associated with lower surgical revision risk as compared to fundoplication (1.2% vs 3.0% per year, respectively; HR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04), and similar PPI-reuptake risk (2.6% vs 4.2% per year; HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.16; p = 0.12). Adverse event rates during primary stay were similar (MSA vs. fundoplication: 1% vs. 3%, p = 0.68). Fewer patients experienced adverse events in the MSA group after discharge (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.11), driven by higher rates of self-limiting dysphagia (1% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and gas/bloating (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.06) after fundoplication. Differences between MSA and fundoplication in dysphagia requiring diagnostic endoscopy (11% vs. 8%, p = 0.54) or surgical revision (2% vs. 1%, p = 1.0) were non-significant. The device explantation rate was 4% (5/141). CONCLUSION: MSA reduces the re-operation risk compared to fundoplication and may decrease adverse event rates after discharge. Randomized head-to-head studies between available surgical options are needed.

Migraine and gastroesophageal reflux disease: Disentangling the complex connection with depression as a mediator.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and migraine are public health concerns worldwide. No observational study has conclusively elucidated the causal relationship between these two conditions. We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) methods to explore the potential causal links between GERD and migraine. METHODS: Genome-wide association studies were subjected to MR to infer the causality between GERD and migraine. Bidirectional two-sample MR was performed to establish causal relationships. Multivariable MR analysis was conducted to adjust potential confounding factors, and mediation MR analysis was utilized to assess the role of depression between GERD and migraine as a mediator. We primarily utilized the inverse variance weighted method (IVW) and sensitivity analysis methods, including MR-Egger, weighted median, and leave-one-out methods. We assessed heterogeneity and pleiotropy to ensure the reliability of the results. RESULTS: Bidirectional two-sample MR revealed a positive causal effect of GERD on migraine (IVW: OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.34-1.66, p = 3.70E-13). Migraine did not increase the risk of GERD (IVW: OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.17, p = 0.1139). Multivariable MR indicated that the positive causal effect of GERD on migraine remained after adjustment for factors, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and depression. Mediation MR revealed that depression mediated 28.72% of GERD's effect on migraine. MR analysis was supported by all sensitivity analyses and was replicated and validated in another independent dataset on migraine. CONCLUSION: Our findings elucidate the positive causal effect of GERD on migraine and underscores the mediating role of depression in increasing the risk of migraine due to GERD. Effective control of GERD, particularly interventions targeting depression, may aid in preventing the occurrence of migraine. Future research should delve deeper into the specific pathophysiological mechanisms through which GERD affects migraine risk, facilitating the development of more effective drug targets or disease management strategies.

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Survivors From Infancy to Adulthood.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbidity associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), with reported cases of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma before the age of 25. The prevalence and natural course of GERD in CDH survivors remain uncertain due to variations in diagnostic methods. We aimed to analyse the GERD prevalence from infancy through young adulthood. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pH-impedance measurements and endoscopic findings in 96 CDH survivors evaluated as routine care using well established clinical protocols. GERD was defined as an abnormal acid exposure time for pH-MII measurements and as presence of reflux esophagitis or BE at upper endoscopy. Clinical data including symptoms at time of follow-up and use of antireflux medication were collected. RESULTS: GERD prevalence remained consistently low (≤10%) across all age groups, yet many patients experienced GER symptoms. Histological abnormalities were observed in 80% of adolescents and young adults, including microscopic esophagitis in 50%. BE was diagnosed in 7% before the age of 18, all had GER symptoms. CDH severity, anatomy at the time of CDH correction, alcohol usage, and smoking did not emerge as significant risk factors for GERD. CONCLUSIONS: Given the low GERD prevalence in CDH survivors, a symptom-driven approach to diagnosis and follow-up is warranted. We advise long-term follow-up for all adult patients due to the early onset of BE and the limited evidence available. The longitudinal course and impact of GERD on other long-term CDH-related comorbidities should be explored in larger cohorts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.