Endoscopic Characteristics of Small-Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Detected During Single-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  The endoscopic features of small-bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are not well defined. The objective of this study was to describe the endoscopic features of GISTs of the small intestine detected via single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Patients with surgically confirmed small intestinal GISTs from January 2014 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The hospital's electronic medical record system was used to retrieve the patients' data, including their demographics, clinical symptoms, hemoglobin on admission, endoscopic and computerized tomography findings, clinicopathological findings, and surgical management data. RESULTS:  In total, 46 GIST patients (23 men and 23 women) with overt bleeding were included, with a mean age of 52 years (23-80 years). The typical duration of the symptoms was 48 hours. Four patients (8.70%) had lesions in the duodenum, 32 (69.56%) had lesions in the jejunum, 8 (17.39%) had lesions in the ileum, and 2 (4.35%) had lesions around the junction of the jejunum and ileum. Out of the 46 patients, 27 underwent SBE, and GISTs were visualized in 25, while the lesions could not be visualized in the remaining 2. Submucosal round (n = 13), submucosal sessile (n = 8), and invasive/penetrating (n = 4) were among the endoscopic tumor features. Twenty patients exhibited submucosal protuberant lesions, with ulceration, vascular nodules/congestion, or erosion on the surface, and 5 patients presented ulcerative infiltrative lesions. The multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the invasive/penetrating characteristics of GISTs under SBE evaluation are significantly correlated with the risk level of GIST malignancy (P < .05). CONCLUSION:  A variety of endoscopic characteristics could be observed during the preoperative SBE evaluation of small-intestine GISTs.

Application of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasonography Based on Texture Features in Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors from Benign Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are common gastric mesenchymal tumors that are potentially malignant. However, endoscopic ultrasonography is poor in diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The study investigated the efficacy of texture features extracted from endoscopic ultrasonography images to differentiate gastrointestinal stromal tumors from gastric mesenchymal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  The endoscopic ultrasonography examinations of 120 patients with confirmed gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leiomyoma, or schwannoma were evaluated. Histology was considered the gold standard. Three feature combinations were extracted from endoscopic ultrasonography images of each lesion: 48 gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features, 48 gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features plus 3 global gray features, and 15 gray-gradient co-occurrence matrix-based features. Support vector machine classifiers were constructed by using feature combinations to diagnose gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. The support vector machine model's diagnostic performance was compared with the endoscopists. RESULTS:  The 3 feature combinations had better performance in differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors: gray-gradient cooccurrence matrix-based features yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90, which was significantly greater than an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 in gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 in the texture features plus 3 global features. The support vector machine model (81.67% accuracy, 81.36% sensitivity, and 81.97% specificity) was also better than endoscopists (an average of 69.31% accuracy, 65.54% sensitivity, and 72.95% specificity) Conclusion: Texture features in computer-assisted endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis are useful to differentiate gastrointestinal stromal tumors from benign gastric mesenchymal tumors and compare favorably with endoscopists. Support vector machine model using gray-gradient co-occurrence matrix-based texture features revealed the best diagnostic performance in diagnosing gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Efficacy of Trametinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Case Report.

Trametinib, an MEK inhibitor, may offer a new therapeutic option for patients with NF1-related GIST.

Long-Term Efficacy of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Intragastric Resection in Treating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, are increasingly treated with minimally invasive surgeries. Developed techniques include laparoscopic, endoscopic, and hybrid methods for gastric GIST resection. Our study, focusing on single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection for gastric GISTs, aims to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. In a retrospective study of GIST surgery involving 14 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resections, we analyzed and compared their preoperative demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, tumor size, neoadjuvant treatment, operation duration, hospital stay, mitotic and Ki-67 indexes, and histological features with those of patients who underwent open and laparoscopic wedge resections, to assess the impact on both survival and disease-free survival. Average operation time was 93.07 minutes (range 81-120 minutes). Average blood loss: 67 ± 20 mL (range 40-110 mL). Postoperative hospital stay averaged 6.79 days (range 4-16 days). Strong correlations were observed between preoperative and pathological tumor sizes (P = .001, P < .001). Survival analysis indicated a significant association with ASA scores (P = .031), but not with mitotic index, Ki-67, or tumor size. Average survival was 80.57 months, with no recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Based on our experience, the single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection method emerges as a highly efficient, timesaving, and gentle oncological procedure, providing a safe and minimally invasive alternative resulting in shorter hospital stays and excellent long-term outcomes with minimal recurrence. For more definitive conclusions, larger, multicenter, and prospective studies are recommended.

Follow-up analysis and research of very low-risk and low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors after endoscopic resection.

Currently, due to limited long-term evidence, there remains some controversy surrounding the recommended postoperative monitoring strategy for primary low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). This study recruited a total of 532 patients diagnosed with very low-risk and low-risk GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection from 2015 to 2021, including 460 very low-risk patients and 72 low-risk patients. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of GIST patients, and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed for survival analysis. The results showed that the 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for very low-risk and low-risk patients were 98.5% and 95.9%, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for both groups were 100%. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival rates were 99.7% for very low-risk patients and 100% for low-risk patients (P = 0.69). Therefore, it is suggested that routine follow-up monitoring, including endoscopic surveillance and imaging, may not be necessary for very low-risk and low-risk GISTs after endoscopic resection.

Incidence and Survival Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Importance: The incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) increased after the implementation of GIST-specific histology coding in 2001, but updated data on trends and survival are lacking. Objective: To examine the evolving epidemiology of GISTs in major organ sites. Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive, population-based cohort study used nationally representative data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, including the SEER-22 and SEER-17 registries. Data were from evaluated patients aged 20 years or older with GISTs diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. Analyses were last updated on October 29, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Organ site-specific trends in age-standardized incidence rates and annual percent changes (APCs) in rates were estimated by race and ethnicity and, when possible, by sex, age, and primary indicator. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine racial and ethnic differences in overall and GIST-specific survival by site. Results: The SEER-22 and SEER-17 datasets contained 23 001 and 12 109 case patients with GISTs, respectively. Patients in the SEER-22 registry had a mean (SD) age of 64 (13) years and 51.3% were men. With regard to race and ethnicity, 9.7% of patients were Asian or Pacific Islander, 12.3% were Hispanic, 19.6% were non-Hispanic Black, and 57.7% were non-Hispanic White. Overall incidence rates of GISTs in the SEER-22 cohort increased substantially over time for all organ sites but the colon (APCs: esophagus, 7.3% [95% CI, 4.4% to 10.2%]; gastric, 5.1% [95% CI, 4.2% to 6.1%]; small intestine, 2.7% [95% CI, 1.8% to 3.7%]; colon, -0.2% [95% CI, -1.3% to 0.9%]; and rectum, 1.9% [95% CI, 0.1% to 3.8%]). There were similar increasing trends by age groups (<50 vs ≥50 years), sex, race and ethnicity, and primary indicator for gastric and small intestine GISTs. Increases were mainly restricted to localized stage disease. Patients in the SEER-17 cohort had a mean (SD) age of 64 (14) years and 51.9% were men. With regard to race and ethnicity, 13.3% of patients were Asian or Pacific Islander, 11.6% were Hispanic, 17.8% were non-Hispanic Black, and 56.6% were non-Hispanic White. Non-Hispanic Black individuals had higher overall mortality for esophageal (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 6.4 [95% CI, 2.0 to 20.3]) and gastric (adjusted HR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5]) GISTs compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Asian or Pacific Islander individuals also had higher overall mortality for esophageal GISTs (adjusted HR, 5.6 [95% CI, 1.5 to 20.2]). Results were similar for GIST-specific survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study using SEER data, the incidence of GISTs in major organ sites increased in the last 2 decades among several population groups. These findings suggest that additional studies are warranted to identify risk factors, because histologic reclassification and higher availability of endoscopy and imaging do not fully explain these unfavorable incidence trends. Prevention efforts are needed to reduce the substantial survival disparities among racial and ethnic minoritized populations.

[Diagnostic yield and utility of boring biopsy for subepithelial lesions of the stomach and esophagus].

Herein, we aimed to examine the diagnostic yield and utility of boring biopsy for subepithelial lesions (SEL) of the stomach and esophagus. A total of 52 patients with SELs of the stomach or esophagus underwent boring biopsy. The diagnostic yield of boring biopsy for gastric and esophageal SELs was 50% (21/42) and 80% (8/10), and for SELs with a diameter of less than 10mm, the diagnostic yield was 67% (6/9) and 83% (5/6), respectively. Forty-three percent (9/21) of the gastric SELs were diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), while all esophageal SELs (8/8) were leiomyomas. Ten percent (4/42) of boring biopsies for the stomach were accompanied by complications:two cases of perforation and two of bleeding.

Is laparoscopic approach as treatment of large gastric GIST acceptable?

AIM: Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (≤ 5 cm) but remains a controversial approach for larger gastric GISTs (> 5 cm). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in comparison with open resection for gastric GISTs measuring over 5 cm. METHOD: All patients receiving surgery for gastric GIST > 5 cm between 2000 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital were included. Data were collected from prospectively maintained records. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Among 108 included patients, 59 patients had minimally invasive (MI) surgery (54.6%) whereas 49 patients had open surgery (46.4%). The rate of overall postoperative morbidity was 14.8% and the median length was significantly shorter in the MI group [4 (range 2-30) vs. 7 (range 4-33) days; P = 0.007]. The overall R0 resection rate was 98.2% and the rate of tumor rupture was 13%, not different between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in 24% of the whole population without any difference between groups (20.3% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.31). Minimally invasive surgery was not found as a negative prognostic disease-free survival factor. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery could be a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in large gastric GIST, bringing the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic results.

Ruptured Duodenal GIST in a Young Female - A Rare Presentation and Comprehensive Review.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon mesenchymal neoplasms primarily found in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While they typically occur in older adults, GISTs can manifest in individuals of any age. This publication paper presents a case study of a rare occurrence: a spontaneously ruptured duodenal GIST in a young female. Through an in-depth review of the literature, we aim to provide insights into the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, management strategies, and long-term outcomes associated with this unique clinical scenario.

RésuméLes tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales (GIST) sont des néoplasmes mésenchymateux peu communs principalement trouvés dans le tractus gastro-intestinal (GI). Bien qu'elles surviennent généralement chez les adultes plus âgés, les GIST peuvent se manifester chez des individus de tout âge. Cet article présente une étude de cas d'une occurrence rare: une GIST duodénale spontanément rompue chez une jeune femme. À travers une revue approfondie de la littérature, nous visons à fournir des éclairages sur la présentation clinique, les défis diagnostiques, les stratégies de prise en charge et les résultats à long terme associés à ce scénario clinique unique.

Deep learning analysis for differential diagnosis and risk classification of gastrointestinal tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to clinical diagnosis. Although AI has already been developed for gastrointestinal (GI) tract endoscopy, few studies have applied AI to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. In this study, we used a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning analysis of EUS images (EUS-CAD) and assessed its ability to differentiate GI stromal tumors (GISTs) from other mesenchymal tumors and their risk classification performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 pathologically confirmed cases of subepithelial lesions (SELs) arising from the muscularis propria layer, including 69 GISTs, 17 leiomyomas and 15 schwannomas, were examined. A total of 3283 EUS images were used for training and five-fold-cross-validation, and 827 images were independently tested for diagnosing GISTs. For the risk classification of 69 GISTs, including very-low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk GISTs, 2,784 EUS images were used for training and three-fold-cross-validation. RESULTS: For the differential diagnostic performance of GIST among all SELs, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 80.4%, 82.9%, 75.3% and 0.865, respectively, whereas those for intermediate- and high-risk GISTs were 71.8%, 70.2%, 72.0% and 0.771, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EUS-CAD system showed a good diagnostic yield in differentiating GISTs from other mesenchymal tumors and successfully demonstrated the GIST risk classification feasibility. This system can determine whether treatment is necessary based on EUS imaging alone without the need for additional invasive examinations.

Long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic therapy vs. surgical resection in patients with cardia gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

The ideal surgical approach for treating cardia gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is not clearly established. This study aimed to assess the long-term survival results among patients who received endoscopic therapy (ET) or surgical resection (SR) for cardia GIST. Cardia GIST patients from 2000 to 2019 were selected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end result (SEER) database. Multiple imputation (MI) was applied to handle missing data, and propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to mitigate selection bias during comparisons. Demographic and clinical characteristics' effects on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 330 patients with cardia GIST were enrolled, including 47 (14.2%) patients with ET and 283 (85.8%) patients with SR. The 5-year OS and CSS rates in the ET and SR groups were comparable [before PSM, (OS) (76.1% vs. 81.2%, P = 0.722), (CSS) (95.0% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.186); after PSM, (OS) (75.4% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.540), (CSS) (94.9% vs. 92.0%, P = 0.099)]. Moreover, there was no significant difference between ET and SR in terms of long-term OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.735, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.422-1.282) and CSS (HR 1.560, 95% CI 0.543-4.481). Our study found no significant disparity in long-term survival outcomes between ET and SR in cardia GIST patients, implying that ET could be a valid surgical strategy for treating cardia GIST.

Survival of advanced/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Taiwan: a nationwide registry study.

BACKGROUND: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor c-KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the survival of patients with GISTs. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of advanced or recurrent GIST patients in Taiwan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled. The collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment pattern, treatment outcome, genetic aberrations and survival status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic factors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients with advanced or recurrent GISTs treated with TKIs were enrolled. All patients received imatinib treatment. Ninety-three and 42 patients received sunitinib and regorafenib treatment, respectively. The 48-month PFS and OS rates for patients treated with imatinib were 50.5% and 79.5%, respectively. c-KIT exon 9 and PDGFRA mutations were prognostic factors for a poor PFS and PDGFRA mutation was a prognostic factor for a poor OS in patients treated with imatinib in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median PFS of patients who received sunitinib treatment was 12.76 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.01-14.52). Patients with c-KIT exon 9 mutations had a longer PFS than those with other genetic aberrations. The median PFS of patients treated with regorafenib was 7.14 months (95% CI, 3.39-10.89). CONCLUSIONS: We present real-world clinical outcomes for advanced GIST patients treated with TKIs and identify mutational status as an independent prognostic factor for patient survival.

Interpretable artificial intelligence to optimise use of imatinib after resection in patients with localised gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend use of adjuvant imatinib therapy for many patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs); however, its optimal treatment duration is unknown and some patient groups do not benefit from the therapy. We aimed to apply state-of-the-art, interpretable artificial intelligence (ie, predictions or prescription logic that can be easily understood) methods on real-world data to establish which groups of patients with GISTs should receive adjuvant imatinib, its optimal treatment duration, and the benefits conferred by this therapy. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, we considered for inclusion all patients who underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GISTs at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY, USA) between Oct 1, 1982, and Dec 31, 2017, and who were classified as intermediate or high risk according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen criteria and had complete follow-up data with no missing entries. A counterfactual random forest model, which used predictors of recurrence (mitotic count, tumour size, and tumour site) and imatinib duration to infer the probability of recurrence at 7 years for a given patient under each duration of imatinib treatment, was trained in the MSKCC cohort. Optimal policy trees (OPTs), a state-of-the-art interpretable AI-based method, were used to read the counterfactual random forest model by training a decision tree with the counterfactual predictions. The OPT recommendations were externally validated in two cohorts of patients from Poland (the Polish Clinical GIST Registry), who underwent GIST resection between Dec 1, 1981, and Dec 31, 2011, and from Spain (the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas), who underwent resection between Oct 1, 1987, and Jan 30, 2011. FINDINGS: Among 1007 patients who underwent GIST surgery in MSKCC, 117 were included in the internal cohort; for the external cohorts, the Polish cohort comprised 363 patients and the Spanish cohort comprised 239 patients. The OPT did not recommend imatinib for patients with GISTs of gastric origin measuring less than 15·9 cm with a mitotic count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm2 or for those with small GISTs (<5·4 cm) of any site with a count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm2. In this cohort, the OPT cutoffs had a sensitivity of 92·7% (95% CI 82·4-98·0) and a specificity of 33·9% (22·3-47·0). The application of these cutoffs in the two external cohorts would have spared 38 (29%) of 131 patients in the Spanish cohort and 44 (35%) of 126 patients in the Polish cohort from unnecessary treatment with imatinib. Meanwhile, the risk of undertreating patients in these cohorts was minimal (sensitivity 95·4% [95% CI 89·5-98·5] in the Spanish cohort and 92·4% [88·3-95·4] in the Polish cohort). The OPT tested 33 different durations of imatinib treatment (<5 years) and found that 5 years of treatment conferred the most benefit. INTERPRETATION: If the identified patient subgroups were applied in clinical practice, as many as a third of the current cohort of candidates who do not benefit from adjuvant imatinib would be encouraged to not receive imatinib, subsequently avoiding unnecessary toxicity on patients and financial strain on health-care systems. Our finding that 5 years is the optimal duration of imatinib treatment could be the best source of evidence to inform clinical practice until 2028, when a randomised controlled trial with the same aims is expected to report its findings. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute.

Hypercalcaemia in gastrointestinal stromal tumour and sarcoidosis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hypercalcaemia is a common manifestation of sarcoidosis but is sparingly described in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We describe a case of acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia resulting from simultaneous diagnosis of GIST and sarcoidosis, the presentation of which has not yet been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old male presented with acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia, with elevated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. Investigations demonstrated a large gastric antral mass which was resected and proven to be GIST. Histopathology of incidentally found liver nodules revealed non-necrotising epithelioid granulomas consistent with concomitant sarcoidosis. The hypercalcemia was successfully treated with bisphosphonate therapy, resection of the GIST and a four month course of corticosteroids, which was truncated due to a mycobacterial infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our case report is the first to describe hypercalcemia due to GIST and biopsy-proven sarcoidosis, thereby raising the possibility of a common pathophysiological pathway relating the two entities. We review the literature describing the mechanisms of hypercalcaemia in GIST and the association between GIST and sarcoidosis.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Is There Any Advantage of Robotic Resections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The role of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in patients requiring surgery for gastric GISTs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 4, 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to select all types of analytic studies comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for GISTs and reporting intraoperative, postoperative, and/or pathological outcomes. Results: Overall, 4 retrospective studies were selected, including a total of 264 patients, specifically 111 (42%) in the robotic and 153 (58%) in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operating time (+42.46 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.34, 75.58; P=0.01; I2: 85%) and reduced use of mechanical staplers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.11; P<0.00001; I2: 92%;) compared with laparoscopy. Although nonsignificant, conversion to open surgery was less frequently reported for robotic surgery (2.7%) than laparoscopy (5.2%) (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.17, 2.03; P=0.4; I2: 0%). No difference was found for postoperative and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for gastric GISTs provides similar intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes to laparoscopy, despite longer operative time.