Case managers within general practices in 11 Western countries: repeat cross-sectional studies.

BACKGROUND: In the context of an ageing population and increasing health needs, primary care reform is needed and several new models have emerged, including the introduction of case managers in general practitioner practices. AIM: To describe the frequency of case managers in general practices in eleven Western countries between 2012 and 2019 and to investigate the characteristics of general practitioners and their practices associated with case manager frequency. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys of Primary Care Physicians, which were international cross-sectional studies conducted in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Random samples of general practitioners were selected in 11 Western countries (2012: n = 9776; 2015: n = 12,049; 2019: n = 13,200). The use of case managers in general practitioner practices was determined with the question "Does your practice use personnel, such as nurses or case managers, to monitor and manage care for patients with chronic conditions that need regular follow-up care?", with possible answers "Yes, within the practice", "Yes, outside the practice", "Yes, both within and outside the practice" or "No". Other variables characterising general practitioners and their practices were considered. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The frequency of case managers within general practitioner practices varied greatly by country, with an overall trend towards an increase from 2012 to 2019. In the multivariate analysis, more case managers were found in practices located in small towns (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.7) and in rural areas (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.4) compared to cities. The frequency of case managers was higher in larger practices, as shown in comparisons of practices in the second, third and fourth quartile of full-time equivalent employee counts compared to those in the first quartile (Q2: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-1.9; Q3: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.9; Q4: OR 3.8, 95% CI 3.0-4.9). There was no significant difference in frequency with respect to the age and sex of the general practitioners. CONCLUSION: The use of case managers in general practitioner practices is a promising approach, but its practice varies greatly. This practice has been developing in Western countries and is tending to increase. The implementation of case managers seems to be associated with certain characteristics linked to general practitioner practices (practice location, practice size), whereas it does not seem to depend on the personal characteristics of general practitioners, such as age or sex.

How early clinical experiences in rural communities influence student learning about rural generalism considered through the lens of educational theory.

Introduction: Rural communities have poorer health compared to urban populations due partly to having lesser healthcare access. Rural placements during medical education can equip students with the knowledge and skills to work in rural communities, and, it is hoped, increase the supply of rural physicians. It is unclear how students gain knowledge of rural generalism during placements, and how this can be understood in terms of place-based and/or sociocultural educational theories. To gain insight into these questions we considered the experiences of pre-clerkship medical students who completed two mandatory four-week rural placements during their second year of medical school. Methods: Data was collected using semi-structured interviews or focus groups, followed by thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Results: Rural placements allowed students to learn about rural generalism such as breadth of practice, and boundary issues. This occurred mainly by students interacting with rural physician faculty, with the effectiveness of precepting being key to students acquiring knowledge and skills and reporting a positive regard for the placement experience. Discussion: Our data show the central role of generalist physician preceptors in how and what students learn while participating in rural placements. Sociocultural learning theory best explains student learning, while place-based education theory helps inform the curriculum. Effective training and preparation of preceptors is likely key to positive student placement experiences.

Introduction: Les communautés rurales sont en moins bonne santé que les populations urbaines, en partie parce qu'elles ont moins accès aux soins de santé. Les stages de médecine en milieu rural peuvent permettre aux étudiants d'acquérir les connaissances et les compétences nécessaires pour travailler dans les communautés rurales et, on l'espère, augmenter le nombre de médecins y travaillent. On ne sait pas clairement comment les étudiants acquièrent des connaissances sur le généralisme rural au cours de leurs stages, et comment cela peut être compris en termes de théories éducatives socioculturelles et/ou basées sur le lieu de travail. Pour répondre à ces questions, nous avons étudié les expériences d'étudiants en médecine au pré-clinique qui ont effectué deux stages obligatoires de quatre semaines en milieu rural au cours de leur deuxième année d'études de médecine. Méthodes: Les données ont été recueillies au moyen d'entrevues semi-structurées ou de groupes de discussion, suivis d'une analyse thématique des transcriptions des entrevues. Résultats: Les stages en milieu rural ont permis aux étudiants de se familiariser avec le généralisme rural, notamment l'étendue de la pratique et les questions de limites. L'efficacité du préceptorat est essentielle pour que les étudiants acquièrent des connaissances et des compétences et qu'ils aient une expérience de stage positive. Discussion: Nos données témoignent du rôle central que jouent les médecins généralistes précepteurs quant au contenu et modes d'apprentissage des étudiants lorsqu'ils participent à des stages en milieu rural. La théorie de l'apprentissage socioculturel est celle qui explique le mieux l'apprentissage des étudiants, tandis que la théorie de la formation fondée sur le lieu contribue à orienter le programme d'études. Une formation et préparation efficace des précepteurs est probablement la clé d'une expérience de stage positive pour les étudiants.

Guide to shave procedures in general practice.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners manage a significant proportion of inflammatory and neoplastic skin conditions on a daily basis. Various surgical techniques can be employed to aid in diagnosis, including punch biopsies, shave biopsy, shave excision, incisional biopsy, curettage and formal excision with closure. Requiring minimal equipment, shave procedures are quick to perform, produce good cosmetic outcomes and minimise costs. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to discuss shave procedures in detail and highlight the difference between shave biopsies and shave excisions, as well as the role they each have in diagnosing an array of benign, inflammatory and malignant skin conditions, including melanocytic lesions. DISCUSSION: Shave procedures performed on suitable lesions by trained practitioners can be used for sampling or removing suspect lesions. Where the intent is complete removal, margin involvement is rare given good lesion selection and technique.

Assessment and management of sleep disorders in shift workers: Challenges and considerations for general practice.

BACKGROUND: Shift work is characterised by displaced sleep opportunities and associated sleep disturbance. Shift workers often report sleepiness and other wake time symptoms associated with poor sleep. However, clinical sleep disorders are also prevalent in shift workers. Although prevalence rates are similar or higher in shift workers compared with the general population, help seeking in shift workers with sleep disorders is low. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to provide general practitioners with a contemporary overview of the prevalence rates for sleep disorders in shift workers, to clarify the existing evidence relating to mental and physical health consequences of sleep disorders in shift workers and to highlight the need to consider undiagnosed sleep disorders before attributing sleep-related symptoms solely to work schedules. DISCUSSION: Symptoms of sleep loss associated with shift work overlap with symptoms experienced by individuals living with sleep disorders. Although >40% of middle-aged Australians live with a sleep disorder that requires investigation and management, symptoms in shift workers are often attributed to the work schedule and, as a result, might not be investigated for appropriate diagnosis and treatment. We argue that screening for sleep disorders in shift workers with sleep complaints should be a priority.

Heavy drinkers' expectations and experiences when discussing alcohol use during a general practice visit in Australia: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our understanding of community members' expectations and experiences of discussing alcohol use in general practice settings is limited, particularly for people with heavy alcohol use. METHOD: Qualitative interviews were conducted with people with heavy alcohol use to explore their experiences of discussing alcohol use with their general practitioner (GP). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) patient perceptions of alcohol discussions in primary care; (2) the importance of the doctor-patient relationship; and (3) consequences of unmet health needs and expectations. Patients expect their GPs to initiate conversations about alcohol use. Positive interactions are characterised by GPs' caring, non-judgemental and collaborative approach, whereas negative interactions focus on a perceived lack of knowledge or ability to manage excessive alcohol use. DISCUSSION: Alcohol harm reduction efforts should include strategies for bolstering the therapeutic relationship between GPs and their patients.

An exploration of Northern Ireland general practice pharmacists' views on their role in general practice: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research examining the views of general practice pharmacists (GPPs) on their role and their impact in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPPs' views regarding this role and its potential impact within general practice in Northern Ireland (NI). METHODS: A paper-based self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 319 general practices in NI in 2022, directed to the GPP who spent most time at the practice. A variety of closed and open questions were included in six sections. Responses to closed questions were analysed descriptively whilst open question responses were analysed using content analysis. To ascertain associations between variables (e.g. GPP prescribing status, working arrangements and aspects of collaboration with GPPs), Fisher's exact test was employed with an a priori significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: 155 responses were received equating to a response rate of 48.5%. Most participants (72.3%) were female, independent prescribers (71%), and 64.5% were currently using their independent prescriber qualification. Services that were provided by most GPPs were medication reconciliation (99.4%) and medication reviews (97.4%). The most common method of communication between GPPs and general practitioners (GPs) was face-to-face (89.0%). Telephone was the most common method of communication between GPPs, community pharmacists (97.4%) and patients (98.7%). Most GPPs (> 80%) showed positive attitudes towards collaboration with GPs and those who worked in multiple practices were more likely to agree with the Attitudes Towards Collaboration Instrument for pharmacists (ATCI-P) statements compared to those who worked in a single practice (p < 0.05). Less than 40% (36.8%) of GPPs agreed that patients were aware of the role they provided. The majority of GPPs (80.6%) expressed positive views on their impact on primary care. Analysis of the free-text comments revealed the need for more GPP patient-facing activities, GPP-specific training, and promotion of the GPP role. CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that GPPs had largely positive views about their role and their impact on primary care. The results may be helpful for practices and service commissioners. Further research is necessary to explore the perspectives of patients regarding the role of the GPP and to enhance patients' awareness of the GPP.

Acceptability and feasibility of an evaluation table to assess the competency of general medicine interns during ambulatory rotations in Brest.

BACKGROUND: General practitioner interns need to acquire the expected clinical, communication, personal and professional competencies. Internship evaluations use qualitative evaluation tables to assess competency acquisition. However, there is no standardised evaluation table used in France. Some faculties use the exhaustive, precise, and manageable Exceler evaluation tool. We aim to evaluate opinions of General practice interns in Brest about the acceptability and feasibility of using the Exceler evaluation tool to monitor competency acquisition during internships. METHODS: This qualitative study used intern focus groups. Six-open ended questions with optional follow-up questions were asked. Cards from the Dixit® game were used to guide and facilitate discussion. Open, axial, then integrative analysis of the verbatim was performed. RESULTS: This is the first study to evaluate intern opinions about GP internship evaluations using focus groups. Participants felt that the quality of existing evaluations was insufficient, and it was difficult to monitor their progress. Adapting evaluations to individual profiles and backgrounds seemed necessary. Exceler appeared to be a possible solution due to its content validity, flexibility of use and accessibility. However, there were comments about possible modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Analysing opinions of tutors, supervisors and other practice centers could help identify potential barriers and reveal solutions to facilitate its implementation and use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Practice list size, workforce composition and performance in English general practice: a latent profile analysis.

BACKGROUND: Following government calls for General Practices in England to work at scale, some practices have grown in size from traditionally small, General Practitioner (GP)-led organisations to large multidisciplinary enterprises. We assessed the effect of practice list size and workforce composition on practice performance in clinical outcomes and patient experience. METHODS: We linked five practice-level datasets in England to obtain a single dataset of practice workforce, list size, proportion of registered patients ≥ 65 years of age, female-male sex ratio, deprivation, rurality, GP contract type, patient experience of care, and Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) and non-QOF clinical processes and outcomes. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to cluster general practices into groups based on practice list size and workforce composition. Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike Information Criterion and deliberation within the research team were used to determine the most informative number of groups. One-way ANOVA was used to assess how groups differed on indicator variables and other variables of interest. Linear regression was used to assess the association between practice group and practice performance. RESULTS: A total of 6024 practices were available for class assignment. We determined that a 3-class grouping provided the most meaningful interpretation; 4494 (74.6%) were classified as 'Small GP-reliant practices', 1400 (23.2%) were labelled 'Medium-size GP-led practices with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) input' and 131 (2.2%) practices were named 'Large multidisciplinary practices'. Small GP-reliant practices outperformed larger multidisciplinary practices on all patient-reported indicators except on confidence and trust where medium-size GP-led practices with MDT input appeared to do better. There was no difference in performance between small GP-reliant practices and larger multidisciplinary practices on QOF incentivised indicators except on asthma reviews where medium-size GP-led practices with MDT input performed worse than smaller GP-reliant practices and immunisation coverage where the same group performed better than smaller GP-reliant practices. For non-incentivised indicators, larger multidisciplinary practices had higher cancer detection rates than small GP-reliant practices. CONCLUSION: Small GP-reliant practices were found to provide better patient reported access, continuity of care, experience and satisfaction with care. Larger multidisciplinary practices appeared to have better cancer detection rates but had no effect on other clinical processes and outcomes. As England moves towards larger multidisciplinary practices efforts should be made to preserve good patient experience.

[General practice and occupational medicine: a dynamic exchange?] / Médecine générale, médecine du travail : quelle dynamique d'échange ?

GENERAL PRACTICE AND OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE: A DYNAMIC EXCHANGE? Occupational physicians and general practitioners have different roles but share the common goal of maintaining and promoting the health of the population. Their collaboration is necessary, and both practitioners and employees are generally in favor of it. This collaboration is particularly necessary in several situations: the discovery of a pathology by the occupational physician, the need for temporary incapacity, or difficulties in maintaining employment. Especially in the case of musculoskeletal disorders and mental suffering at work. The pre-reinstatement visit is an important tool for achieving this collaboration. There are also several ways of improving these exchanges, such as the introduction of joint training courses.

MÉDECINE GÉNÉRALE, MÉDECINE DU TRAVAIL : QUELLE DYNAMIQUE D'ÉCHANGE ? Le médecin du travail et le médecin généraliste ont des places et des rôles différents mais pour objectif commun de maintenir et promouvoir la santé de la population. Leur nécessaire collaboration, à laquelle les praticiens comme les salariés se disent globalement favorables, est pourtant insuffisamment constatée sur le terrain. Cette collaboration est nécessaire dans plusieurs situations : découverte d'une pathologie par le médecin du travail, nécessité d'une inaptitude temporaire ou encore difficultés de maintien en emploi. C'est particulièrement le cas pour les situations de troubles musculo-squelettiques et de souffrance psychique au travail. La visite de préreprise est un outil important pour permettre cette collaboration. Il existe également plusieurs pistes d'amélioration de ces échanges, comme la mise en place de formations communes.

[Integrative medicine for patients suffering from addictive disorders alongside other pathologies in general practice]. / Clinique intégrative des addictions coexistant avec d'autres pathologies en médecine générale.

People suffering from substance use disorders frequently suffer from concomitant affections such as other addictions, psychiatric, somatic or social problems. Clarifying objectives and priorities with the patient and coordination of care are the priority in the follow up suggested in this article. We present a clinical example in which the modality of care is adapted depending on the evolution of the patient's needs. The follow up by a general practitioner can be pursued in parallel to specialized care. The modality of this collaboration will have to adapt to the patients' and healthcare workers' needs. This follow-up aims to provide good quality health care all the while supporting the healthcare providers who can, sometimes, feel helplessness.

Les personnes souffrant d'un trouble de l'utilisation de substances présentent fréquemment plusieurs affections parallèles telles que d'autres problématiques addictologiques, psychiatriques, somatiques ou sociales. La clarification des objectifs et priorités avec le patient ainsi que la coordination des soins sont au premier plan de la prise en charge proposée dans cet article. Nous présentons, au travers d'une vignette clinique, un exemple de suivi pour lequel la modalité de prise en charge s'adapte aux besoins changeants du patient au cours du temps. Le suivi par un médecin généraliste peut être combiné à un suivi spécialisé. Le mode de collaboration devra s'adapter aux besoins des soignants et du patient. Ce suivi visera à assurer des soins de qualité tout en soutenant les soignants face à un possible sentiment d'impuissance.

Patients' and professionals' experiences with remote care during COVID-19: a qualitative study in general practices in low-income neighborhoods.

AIM: To explore how patients and general practice professionals in low-income neighborhoods experienced the increase of remote care during COVID-19. BACKGROUND: As the GP (general practitioner) is the first point of contact in Dutch health care, there are concerns about access to remote care for patients from low-income neighborhoods. Now that general practice professionals have returned to the pre-pandemic ways of healthcare delivery, this paper looks back at experiences with remote care during COVID-19. It investigates experiences of both patients and general practice professionals with the approachability and appropriateness of remote care and their satisfaction. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 78 patients and 18 GPs, 7 nurse practitioners and 6 mental health professionals were interviewed. Interviews were held on the phone and face-to-face in the native language of the participants. FINDINGS: Remote care, especially telephone consultation, was generally well-approachable for patients from low-income neighborhoods. Contrarily, video calling was rarely used. This was partly because patients did not know how to use it. The majority of patients thought remote care was possible for minor ailments but would also still like to see the doctor face-to-face regularly. Patients were generally satisfied with remote care at the time, but this did not necessarily reflect their willingness to continue using it in the future. Moreover, there was lack in consensus among general practice professionals on the appropriateness of remote care for certain physical and mental complaints. Nurse practitioners and mental health professionals had a negative attitude toward remote care. In conclusion, it is important to take the opinions and barriers of patients and care providers into account and to increase patient-centered care elements and care provider satisfaction in remote care. Integrating remote care is not only important in times of crisis but also for future care that is becoming increasingly digitalized.

Rural generalist medicine: a developing approach to health care in rural and island Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Despite universal health coverage and high life expectancy, Japan faces challenges in health care that include providing care for the world's oldest population, increasing healthcare costs, physician maldistribution and an entrenched medical workforce and training system. Primary health care has typically been practised by specialists in other fields, and general medicine has only been certified as an accredited specialty since 2018. There are continued challenges to develop an awareness and acceptance of the primary health medical workforce in Japan. The impact of these challenges is highest in rural and island areas of Japan, with nearly 50% of rural and remote populations considered 'elderly'. Concurrently, these areas are experiencing physician shortages as medical graduates gravitate to urban areas and choose medical specialties more commonly practised in cities. This study aimed to understand the views on the role of rural generalist medicine (RGM) in contributing to solutions for rural and island health care in Japan. METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 16 participants, including Rural Generalist Program Japan (RGPJ) registrars and supervisors, the RGPJ director, government officials, rural health experts and academics. Interviews were of 35-50 minutes duration and conducted between May and July 2019. Some interviews were conducted in person at the WONCA Asia-Pacific Conference in Kyoto, some onsite in hospital settings and some were videoconferenced. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. All transcripts were analysed through an inductive thematic process based on the grouping of codes. RESULTS: From the interview analysis, six main themes were identified: (1) key issues facing rural and island health in Japan; (2) participant background; (3) local demography and population; (4) identity, perception and role of RGM; (5) RGPJ experience; and (6) suggested reforms and recommendations. DISCUSSION: The RGPJ was generally considered to be a positive step toward reshaping the medical workforce to address the geographic inequities in Japan. While improvements to the program were suggested by participants, it was also generally agreed that a more systematic, national approach to RGM was needed in Japan. Key findings from this study are relevant to this goal. This includes considering the drivers to participating in the RGPJ for future recruitment strategies and the need for an idiosyncratic Japanese model of RGM, with agreed advanced skills and supervision models. Also important are the issues raised by participants on the need to improve community acceptance and branding of rural generalist doctors to support primary care in rural and island areas. CONCLUSION: The RGPJ represents an effort to bolster the national rural medical workforce in Japan. Discussions from participants in this study indicate strong support to continue research, exploration and expansion of a national RGM model that is contextualised for Japanese conditions and that is branded and promoted to build community support for the role of the rural generalist.

How do patients perceive the retirement of their general practitioner? A qualitative interview study in France.

OBJECTIVES: The perspective of general practitioners' (GPs) on retirement and the factors influencing their attitude towards retirement have been previously investigated. However, while the number of GPs has been declining for many years in France, leading to the emergence of medical deserts, the impact on their patients remains to be explored. The aim of this study was to understand patients' perceptions of their GP's retirement. DESIGN: A semistructured interview-based qualitative study was conducted, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in two general practices located in Essonne, Ile-de-France, France, between January and April 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen women and five men, aged 21-94 years, were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were the non-declaration of the physician as the declared doctor and being under 18 years of age. RESULTS: The GP-patient relationship is a link that is built up over time, over the course of several consultations. Patients choose their GP based on qualities or skills they value. In this way, the physician chosen is unique for their patients; this choice reflects a certain loyalty to their physician. The interaction with the family sphere reinforces this relationship through the multiple links created during care. When a GP retires, this link is broken. Patients' reactions can range from indifference to real grief. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of the link between the GPs and their patients and highlights the need to prepare patients for their GP's retirement.

Infection prevention and control in Dutch general practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and its implications for pandemic preparedness and seasonal respiratory epidemics: a qualitative study on lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a re-evaluation of infection prevention and control (IPC) in general practices, highlighting the need for comprehensive IPC implementation. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare workers' (HCWs) experiences and perspectives regarding IPC in general practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and its implications for post-pandemic IPC implementation. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured, in-depth interviews during two time periods: (1) prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2019-February 2020), involving 14 general practitioners (GPs) and medical assistants; and (2) during the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2022-February 2023), including 22 GPs and medical assistants. Data analysis included thematic analysis that addressed multiple system levels. RESULTS: Findings indicated a shift towards comprehensive IPC implementation and organisation during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Since the Omicron variant, some general practices maintained a broad set of IPC measures, while others released most measures. HCWs' future expectations on post-pandemic IPC implementation varied: some anticipated reduced implementation due to the desire to return to the pre-pandemic standard, while others expected IPC to be structurally scaled up during seasonal respiratory epidemics. Main contextual challenges included patient cooperation, staff shortages (due to infection), shortages of IPC materials/equipment, and frequently changing and ambiguous guidelines. Key lessons learned were enhanced preparedness (e.g., personal protective equipment supply), and a new perspective on care organisation (e.g., digital care). Main recommendations reported by HCWs were to strengthen regional collaboration within primary care, and between primary care, public health, and secondary care. CONCLUSION: HCWs' experiences, perspectives and recommendations provide insights to enhance preparedness for future epidemics and pandemics, and sustain IPC in general practices. For IPC improvement strategies, adopting an integrated system-based approach that encompasses actions across multiple levels and engages multiple stakeholders is recommended.

Motives and modifying factors for giving or rejecting psychiatric diagnoses in general medicine and psychiatry - a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: There is a discussion among general practitioners and psychiatrists regarding over-diagnosing versus under-reporting of psychiatric diagnoses. A deeper understanding of this topic is relevant for providing reasonable health care and for planning future studies. A crucial factor to understanding this discussion is the difference in the prevalence of a disease in each sector. One way to attain knowledge about such prevalences is the analysis of routine care data of the sector in question. However, diagnosis-related data might be modified by several additional influencing factors. AIMS: This study aims to explore what kind of motives and modifying factors play a role for or against giving psychiatric diagnoses in psychiatric and general medical settings. METHODS: Twenty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted with German physicians in the fields of general medicine and psychiatry. Interviews were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: The analysis revealed three major motivational categories for finding a diagnosis: (1) "objective matters" such as "categorisation for research"; (2) "functional and performance-related factors" such as "requirement for medication", "billing aspects" that go with certain diagnoses or "access to adequate care" and (3) "Individual factors" such as the "personality of a physician". Similarly, factors emerged that lead to not making psychiatric diagnoses like "fear of stigmatization among patients" or "detrimental insurance status with psychiatric diagnosis". Additionally participants mentioned other reasons for "not diagnosing a psychiatric diagnosis", such as "coding of other clinical pictures". CONCLUSION: The diagnostic process is a complex phenomenon that goes far beyond the identification of medical findings. This insight should be considered when processing and interpreting secondary data for designing health care systems or designing a study.

Barriers and facilitators to learning health systems in primary care: a framework analysis.

BACKGROUND: The learning health system (LHS) concept is a potential solution to the challenges currently faced by primary care. There are few descriptions of the barriers and facilitators to achieving an LHS in general practice, and even fewer that are underpinned by implementation science. This study aimed to describe the barriers and facilitators to achieving an LHS in primary care and provide practical recommendations for general practices on their journey towards an LHS. METHODS: This study is a secondary data analysis from a qualitative investigation of an LHS in a university-based general practice in Sydney, Australia. A framework analysis was conducted using transcripts from semistructured interviews with clinic staff. Data were coded according to the theoretical domains framework, and then to an LHS framework. RESULTS: 91% (n=32) of practice staff were interviewed, comprising general practitioners (n=15), practice nurses (n=3), administrative staff (n=13) and a psychologist. Participants reported that the practice alignment with LHS principles was influenced by many behavioural determinants, some of which were applicable to healthcare in general, for example, some staff lacked knowledge about practice policies and skills in using software. However, many were specific to the general practice environment, for example, the environmental context of general practice meant that administrative staff were an integral part of the LHS, particularly in facilitating partnerships with patients. CONCLUSIONS: The LHS journey in general practice is influenced by several factors. Mapping the LHS domains in relation to the theoretical domains framework can be used to generate a roadmap to hasten the journey towards LHS in primary care settings.

Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit-stand desks: a feasibility trial.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners (GPs) using sit-stand desks to facilitate standing during consultations. A further aim was to examine the views of patients about GPs standing for their consultations. DESIGN: A pre-post single-group experimental trial design. SETTING: General practices in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 42 GPs (working a minimum of five clinical sessions per week) and 301 patients (aged ≥18 years). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention consisted of each GP having a sit-stand desk (Opløft Sit-Stand Platform) installed in their consultation room for 4 working weeks. Sit-stand desks allow users to switch, in a few seconds, between a sitting and standing position and vice versa, by adjusting the height of the desk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To test feasibility and acceptability, GPs reported their views about using sit-stand desks at work at baseline and follow-up. Sitting time and physical activity were also measured via accelerometer at baseline and follow-up. Patients who attended a consultation where their GP was standing were asked to complete an exit questionnaire about the perceived impact on the consultation. RESULTS: Most GPs reported using their sit-stand desk daily (n=28, 75.7%). 16 GPs (44.4%) used their sit-stand desk during face-to-face consultations every day. Most GPs and patients did not view that GPs standing during face-to-face consultations impacted the doctor-patient relationship (GPs; 73.5%, patients; 83.7%). GPs' sitting time during work was 121 min per day lower (95% CI: -165 to -77.58) at follow-up compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sit-stand desks is acceptable within general practice and may reduce sitting time in GPs. This may benefit GPs and help reduce sitting time in patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN76982860.