Surgeon Perceptions and Variations in Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference: Report of a Survey from the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the evolution of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (MMCs) from the early 20th century as a means of identifying surgeon error into current practices as identifying hospital-based system factors that contribute to adverse patient events. Further, to elucidate differences in the perception of MMCs between trainees and attending surgeons as well as differences in the structure of MMCs geographically and by institution type. DESIGN: We developed a survey that was distributed to current American College of Surgeon members through Survey Monkey. SETTING: Survey-based study. PARTICIPANTS: Current members of the American College of Surgeons, including Board of Governors, surgeons, and trainees. RESULTS: There were a total of 1,396 responses to the survey, 814 (58%) from surgical trainees and 582 (42%) from attending surgeons. Both surgical trainees and attending surgeons noted that the most common day for MMCs was Wednesday and that the most common time for MMCs was before 7:30 AM. Further, most surgical trainees and attending surgeons noted that there was no structured format to their institution's MMCs and that increased attending surgeon engagement would make MMCs more educational. Significant variations in MMCs existed across both geographic region and by institution type. CONCLUSION: The results from this survey highlight key aspects of MMCs that contribute to their educational value. Staff engagement was noted to be the most educational aspect of MMCs. While geographic and institutional differences will likely persist, efforts should be made to increase staff engagement at MMCs in addition to a more structured approach.

How well prepared are hospitals for future crises? Board members perceive their hospitals as resilient for acute crises.

Resilience is an organizational capacity in day-to-day practice and crisis situation performance. A one of a kind crisis for hospitals is the COVID-19 pandemic. The long duration and magnitude of this crisis offers the opportunity to gain insight into the complexity of crisis management and organizational resilience of hospitals. This interview study therefore explored the organizational resilience of Dutch hospitals during the first 14 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nine board members of nine Dutch hospitals were interviewed by means of a semi-structured interview that was built on thirteen indicators of organizational resilience. The results showed that board members considered their hospitals as resilient on almost all indicators. Their judgments varied about how prepared and ready for future crises they considered their hospital. According to board members, hospitals are mainly prepared for "acute" short-term crises, thanks to good crisis leadership, open communication and strong networks. A crisis as long as the COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and therefore more difficult to deal with. In between the infection waves, work processes were reflected upon to learn, anticipate and respond more smoothly to successive waves. However, the enduring nature of the COVD-19 crisis presented complex organizational challenges. Crisis operations were eventually scaled down and hospitals had to manage the crisis and regular care as two companies side by side. Each crisis manifests differently. Fostering trust in healthcare staff and allowing them to act autonomously during crises, while diligently monitoring external influences and potential future crises, are therefore paramount in developing organizational adaptive capacities.

The influence of non-state-owned shareholder governance on the governance level of state-owned enterprises--Based on the perspective of board resolution behavior and party organization governance.

With an increasing number of heterogeneous shareholders participating in corporate governance in reality, the assumption of shareholder homogeneity in agency theory is gradually relaxing in the modern field of corporate governance. The policy of mixed ownership reform in China provides empirical evidence for studying heterogeneous shareholder governance. To fully understand the governance effects of non-state shareholders, we employ the ownership proportion held by non-state shareholders among the top ten shareholders and the appointment of directors as measures for non-state shareholder governance. Using a panel fixed-effect model from the perspective of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) party organizations, we examine the impact of non-state shareholder governance on the governance level of SOEs. The study reveals that non-state shareholder governance positively affects the governance level of SOEs, with board resolutions playing a crucial role in this relationship. When party members serve as directors, the governance effect of non-state shareholders is more significant. Based on the aforementioned research findings, we recommend further refining corporate governance measures for SOEs within the context of SOE reforms. It is advisable to optimize the party organizational governance structure and leverage the synergistic effects of non-state shareholder governance and party organizational governance. Advancing reforms along the Pareto improvement path will contribute to establishing a distinctive corporate governance system for Chinese SOEs.

Gender board diversity across Europe throughout four decades.

We present a Gender Board Diversity Dataset (GBDD), which provides a cross-country perspective on women in management and supervisory boards that spans between 1985 and 2020. The data covers 43 European countries and accounts for private companies in addition to the stock-listed ones. GBBD was created using firm-level Orbis data. Our measures are based on a sample of more than 28 million unique firms observed for nearly seven years on average and reporting data about nearly 59 million individuals on management and supervisory boards. We provide the measures at the level of industry, country and year (firm-level data is proprietary). We provide three measures. The first is the share of women among all board members in a given industry, country, and year. The second one is the average of the shares of women across firms in a given industry, country and year. We also provide a new measure: the share of firms in a given industry, country and year which report no single woman on their board(s).

Investigating the Role of Local Board of Health Governance on Local Health Department Policymaking Behavior.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify groupings of policymaking behavior among local governmental health departments (LHDs) across the country and assess whether such groupings were associated with the governance activity of their board of health (BOH). DESIGN: We conducted latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible classes of policymaking behavior among LHDs. Once classes were identified, we used multinomial logistic regression (MLN) to estimate the association between an LHD's policymaking behavior and the governance activity of their BOH. SETTING: 2019 wave of the National Association of City and County Health Officials (NACCHO) Profile Survey. PARTICIPANTS: All LHDs with BOHs in the 2019 NACCHO Profile Survey (n = 1003). OUTCOME MEASURES: Within our MLN, our primary outcome of interest was the association between an LHD's policymaking class (the main dependent variable) and the governance activity of its BOH (the main independent variable). RESULTS: Based on our LCA, we determined our sample to be composed of what we characterized as "Limited Policy-Involvement," "Average Policy Involvement," and "Expanded Policy Involvement" LHDs. Those in the Expanded Class were more likely to be involved across all policy areas compared to the Limited and Average class, especially among social determinants of health (SDOH)-related areas. Our MLN estimated that having a BOH active in legal authority was associated with an 86% increased chance that an LHD would be in the "Average Class" compared to the "Limited Class" and having a BOH active in partnership engagement was associated with an 86% more likely chance that an LHD is in the "Expanded Class" compared to the "Average Class." CONCLUSION: Using nationally representative data on LHD activity, we found distinct groups of policymaking behavior, including a quarter of LHDs that are highly active in traditional and SDOH-related policy areas. We also found that groupings of policymaking behavior, as indicated by class designation, are strongly associated with the BOH's governance activity.