Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.847
Filter
1.
Afr Health Sci ; 24(1): 228-238, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962342

ABSTRACT

Background: Early detection of hearing loss and subsequent intervention leads to better speech, language and educational outcomes giving way to improved social economic prospects in adult life. This can be achieved through establishing newborn and infant hearing screening programs. Objective: To determine the prevalence of hearing loss in newborns and infants in Nairobi, Kenya. Methods: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted at the National hospital and at a sub county hospital immunization clinic. A total of 9,963 babies aged 0-3 years, were enrolled in the hearing screening program through convenient sampling over a period of nine months. A case history was administered followed by Distortion Product Oto-acoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) hearing screening. Results: The screening coverage rate was 98.6% (9963/10,104). The referral rate for the initial screen was 3.6% (356/ 9,963), the return rate for follow-up rescreening was 72% (258 babies out of 356) with a lost to follow-up rate of 28% (98/356). The referral rate of the second screen was 10% (26/258). All the 26 babies referred from the second screen returned for diagnostic hearing evaluation and were confirmed with hearing loss, yielding a prevalence of 3/1000. Conclusions: Establishing universal newborn and infant hearing screening programs is essential for early detection and intervention for hearing loss. Data management and efficient follow-up systems are an integral part of achieving diagnostic confirmation of hearing loss and early intervention.


Subject(s)
Early Diagnosis , Hearing Loss , Hearing Tests , Neonatal Screening , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Infant , Neonatal Screening/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Pilot Projects , Male , Hearing Tests/methods , Prevalence , Child, Preschool , Mass Screening/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
2.
Codas ; 36(3): e20230091, 2024.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38836822

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To propose an instrument for assessing speech recognition in the presence of competing noise. To define its application strategy for use in clinical practice. To obtain evidence of criterion validity and present reference values. METHODS: The study was conducted in three stages: Organization of the material comprising the Word-with-Noise Test (Stage 1); Definition of the instrument's application strategy (Stage 2); Investigation of criterion validity and definition of reference values for the test (Stage 3) through the evaluation of 50 normal-hearing adult subjects and 12 subjects with hearing loss. RESULTS: The Word-with-Noise Test consists of lists of monosyllabic and disyllabic words and speech spectrum noise (Stage 1). The application strategy for the test was defined as the determination of the Speech Recognition Threshold with a fixed noise level at 55 dBHL (Stage 2). Regarding criterion validity, the instrument demonstrated adequate ability to distinguish between normal-hearing subjects and subjects with hearing loss (Stage 3). Reference values for the test were established as cut-off points expressed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio: 1.47 dB for the monosyllabic stimulus and -2.02 dB for the disyllabic stimulus. Conclusion: The Word-with-Noise Test proved to be quick to administer and interpret, making it a useful tool in audiological clinical practice. Furthermore, it showed satisfactory evidence of criterion validity, with established reference values.


OBJETIVO: Propor um instrumento para a avaliação do reconhecimento de fala na presença de ruído competitivo. Definir sua estratégia de aplicação, para ser aplicado na rotina clínica. Obter evidências de validade de critério e apresentar seus valores de referência. MÉTODO: Estudo realizado em três etapas: Organização do material que compôs o Teste de Palavras no Ruído (Etapa 1); Definição da estratégia de aplicação do instrumento (Etapa 2); Investigação da validade de critério e definição dos valores de referência para o teste (Etapa 3), por meio da avaliação de 50 sujeitos adultos normo-ouvintes e 12 sujeitos com perda auditiva. RESULTADOS: O Teste de Palavras no Ruído é composto por listas de vocábulos mono e dissilábicos e um ruído com espectro de fala (Etapa 1). Foi definida como estratégia de aplicação do teste, a realização do Limiar de Reconhecimento de Fala com ruído fixo em 55 dBNA (Etapa 2). Quanto à validade de critério, o instrumento apresentou adequada capacidade de distinção entre os sujeitos normo-ouvintes e os sujeitos com perda auditiva (Etapa 3). Foram definidos como valores de referência para o teste, os pontos de corte expressos em relação sinal/ruído de 1,47 dB para o estímulo monossilábico e de -2,02 dB para o dissilábico. CONCLUSÃO: O Teste de Palavras no Ruído demonstrou ser rápido e de fácil aplicação e interpretação dos resultados, podendo ser uma ferramenta útil a ser utilizada na rotina clínica audiológica. Além disso, apresentou evidências satisfatórias de validade de critério, com valores de referência estabelecidos.


Subject(s)
Noise , Humans , Reference Values , Adult , Female , Male , Young Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Middle Aged , Speech Perception/physiology , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Speech Reception Threshold Test/methods , Speech Reception Threshold Test/standards , Aged , Adolescent
3.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241260029, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831646

ABSTRACT

The extent to which active noise cancelation (ANC), when combined with hearing assistance, can improve speech intelligibility in noise is not well understood. One possible source of benefit is ANC's ability to reduce the sound level of the direct (i.e., vent-transmitted) path. This reduction lowers the "floor" imposed by the direct path, thereby allowing any increases to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) created in the amplified path to be "realized" at the eardrum. Here we used a modeling approach to estimate this benefit. We compared pairs of simulated hearing aids that differ only in terms of their ability to provide ANC and computed intelligibility metrics on their outputs. The difference in metric scores between simulated devices is termed the "ANC Benefit." These simulations show that ANC Benefit increases as (1) the environmental sound level increases, (2) the ability of the hearing aid to improve SNR increases, (3) the strength of the ANC increases, and (4) the hearing loss severity decreases. The predicted size of the ANC Benefit can be substantial. For a moderate hearing loss, the model predicts improvement in intelligibility metrics of >30% when environments are moderately loud (>70 dB SPL) and devices are moderately capable of increasing SNR (by >4 dB). It appears that ANC can be a critical ingredient in hearing devices that attempt to improve SNR in loud environments. ANC will become more and more important as advanced SNR-improving algorithms (e.g., artificial intelligence speech enhancement) are included in hearing devices.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Noise , Perceptual Masking , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Computer Simulation , Acoustic Stimulation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Equipment Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 510, 2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is common in aging adults and is an important public health concern. Self-reported measures of hearing difficulty are often used in research and clinical practice, as they capture the functional impacts of hearing loss on individuals. However, little research has evaluated the prevalence or factors associated with self-reported hearing difficulty. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of self-reported hearing difficulty, measured by the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI), and associated factors. METHODS: This study was conducted in a community-based cohort study based in Charleston, SC. We determined the prevalence of RHHI self-reported hearing difficulty (score ≥ 6 points) and evaluated associated factors with logistic regression models. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: There were 1558 participants included in this study (mean age 63.7 [SD 14.4], 56.9% female, 20.0% Minority race). The prevalence of RHHI self-reported hearing difficulty was 48.8%. In a multivariable model, older age (per + 1 year; OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.96, 0.98]), Minority (vs. White) race (OR 0.68 [95% CI 0.49, 0.94]), and speech-in-noise scores that are better than predicted (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.98, 1.00]) were associated with lower odds of RHHI self-reported hearing difficulty. Furthermore, female (vs. male) sex (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.03, 1.86]), higher PTA in the worse ear (per + 1 dB; OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.09, 1.12]), more comorbid conditions (vs. 0; 1 condition: OR 1.50 [95% CI 1.07, 2.11]; 2 conditions: OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.32, 2.93]; 3 + conditions: OR 3.00 [95% CI 1.60, 5.62]), noise exposure (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.16, 2.03]), bothersome tinnitus (OR 2.16 [95% CI 1.59, 2.93]), and more depressive symptoms (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01, 1.07]) were associated with higher odds of RHHI self-reported hearing difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RHHI self-reported hearing difficulty is high, and associated factors included demographics, audiometric hearing and other hearing-related factors, and physical and mental health. The RHHI likely captures functional impacts of hearing loss that are not captured by audiometry alone. Study findings can support the correct interpretation of the RHHI in research and clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Self Report , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Prevalence , Aged , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Adult , Aged, 80 and over
5.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241259704, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835268

ABSTRACT

The use of in-situ audiometry for hearing aid fitting is appealing due to its reduced resource and equipment requirements compared to standard approaches employing conventional audiometry alongside real-ear measures. However, its validity has been a subject of debate, as previous studies noted differences between hearing thresholds measured using conventional and in-situ audiometry. The differences were particularly notable for open-fit hearing aids, attributed to low-frequency leakage caused by the vent. Here, in-situ audiometry was investigated for six receiver-in-canal hearing aids from different manufacturers through three experiments. In Experiment I, the hearing aid gain was measured to investigate whether corrections were implemented to the prescribed target gain. In Experiment II, the in-situ stimuli were recorded to investigate if corrections were directly incorporated to the delivered in-situ stimulus. Finally, in Experiment III, hearing thresholds using in-situ and conventional audiometry were measured with real patients wearing open-fit hearing aids. Results indicated that (1) the hearing aid gain remained unaffected when measured with in-situ or conventional audiometry for all open-fit measurements, (2) the in-situ stimuli were adjusted for up to 30 dB at frequencies below 1000 Hz for all open-fit hearing aids except one, which also recommends the use of closed domes for all in-situ measurements, and (3) the mean interparticipant threshold difference fell within 5 dB for frequencies between 250 and 6000 Hz. The results clearly indicated that modern measured in-situ thresholds align (within 5 dB) with conventional thresholds measured, indicating the potential of in-situ audiometry for remote hearing care.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Hearing Aids , Humans , Acoustic Stimulation , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Audiometry/methods , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing , Predictive Value of Tests , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Equipment Design , Male , Female
6.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241260041, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870447

ABSTRACT

Almost since the inception of the modern-day electroacoustic audiometer a century ago the results of pure-tone audiometry have been characterized by an audiogram. For almost as many years, clinicians and researchers have sought ways to distill the volume and complexity of information on the audiogram. Commonly used approaches have made use of pure-tone averages (PTAs) for various frequency ranges with the PTA for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz (PTA4) being the most widely used for the categorization of hearing loss severity. Here, a three-digit triad is proposed as a single-number summary of not only the severity, but also the configuration and bilateral symmetry of the hearing loss. Each digit in the triad ranges from 0 to 9, increasing as the level of the pure-tone hearing threshold level (HTL) increases from a range of optimal hearing (< 10 dB Hearing Level; HL) to complete hearing loss (≥ 90 dB HL). Each digit also represents a different frequency region of the audiogram proceeding from left to right as: (Low, L) PTA for 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; (Center, C) PTA for 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz; and (High, H) HTL at 8000 Hz. This LCH Triad audiogram-classification system is evaluated using a large United States (U.S.) national dataset (N = 8,795) from adults 20 to 80 + years of age and two large clinical datasets totaling 8,254 adults covering a similar age range. Its ability to capture variations in hearing function was found to be superior to that of the widely used PTA4.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Hearing Loss , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Hearing/physiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/classification , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
7.
In Vivo ; 38(4): 1939-1946, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hearing impairment affects a small but significant percentage of newborns (0.1-0.4%). Newborn hearing screening (NHS) is recommended for early detection and treatment. The implementation of NHS can vary among countries. In this study, we present the methodology, organization, and technical requirements of NHS. This study analyzed results from a tertiary hospital, identified issues, and proposed solutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the studied region, there are five maternity hospitals and a perinatal intensive care center and in 2020, there were 5,864 live births. Screening is performed at three levels. The first screening is conducted on the 2nd-3rd day of a newborn's life in a maternity hospital, the first rescreening on the 3rd-6th week at a relevant ENT department, and the second rescreening on the 3rd-6th month of life at the regional screening center where the central database is also held. RESULTS: In the studied region, 5,793 out of 5,864 (98.79%) newborns received NHS in 2020. Of these, 120 (2.07%) were tested positive on their first screening. Ninety-four patients (78.3%) of those attended the ENT department for a first rescreening. Thirty-four patients (0.59% of total) were tested positive again and referred to the regional screening center. Out of the 27 patients who attended the second rescreening, four (0.07% of the total) were ultimately diagnosed with hearing impairment. CONCLUSION: Our study found that newborn hearing screening (NHS) in our region achieved a high compliance rate of 98.8% for initial screenings in 2020. However, challenges remain in the rescreening process due to data management issues, inter-regional cooperation, and public awareness. The recent implementation of mandatory screenings, updated guidelines, and a centralized database is expected to enhance the effectiveness of NHS. Further research is needed to evaluate these improvements.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Hearing Tests , Neonatal Screening , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/methods , Hearing Tests/methods , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Female , Male
8.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 67(7): 2394-2409, 2024 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875481

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to inform the revision of a targeted surveillance risk registry by identifying which risk factors predict postnatally identified hearing loss (PNIHL) in children who pass newborn hearing screening and to determine whether hearing surveillance beyond the age of 1 year is warranted. METHOD: We used retrospective analysis of the audiological outcomes of children born in the state of Queensland, Australia, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, who passed the newborn hearing screen with risk factors. RESULTS: Approximately one third of children were lost to follow-up and could not be included in the analysis. Risk factors that predicted PNIHL in the analyzed cohort were as follows: syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, perinatal infections, and family history of permanent childhood hearing loss. Severe asphyxia did not predict PNIHL but yielded some cases of significant bilateral hearing loss. Hearing loss in children with a history of prolonged ventilation was mild and/or unilateral in nature (except in cases where the hearing loss was due to an unrelated etiology). There were no cases of PNIHL in children with hyperbilirubinemia or neonatal bacterial meningitis. For the risk factors that predicted PNIHL, nearly all hearing losses were detected by 1 year of age, except for children with family history where one quarter of hearing losses had a later onset. CONCLUSIONS: The four risk factors recommended for efficient postnatal identification of hearing loss are as follows: syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, perinatal infection, and family history of permanent childhood hearing loss. Hearing surveillance through to 1 year old is sufficient except for children with a family history, where a second phase assessment is indicated. Alternative targeted surveillance protocols and models of care are required to minimize loss to follow-up.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Neonatal Screening , Registries , Humans , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Neonatal Screening/methods , Risk Factors , Female , Male , Infant , Hearing Tests , Queensland/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Population Surveillance/methods
9.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(7): 740-744, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942612

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of the Mimi Hearing Test (MHT) mobile application in the detection of air conduction (AC) thresholds and in screening for moderate hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Participants with or without a varying degree of hearing loss, aged 18 years and over, without cognitive impairment and without active otorrhea or earwax impaction at the time of the hearing assessment were included. INTERVENTION: Subjects with a ranging severity of hearing loss underwent a conventional in-booth audiogram as well as mobile-based screening with MHT in a quiet room (45.5 dB background noise) on the same day. Both regular over-the-ear and noise-canceling headphones were tested with MHT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of AC thresholds between conventional audiometry and mobile-based audiometry at discrete frequencies and with pure-tone averages (PTA) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 75 adults (mean age: 56.2 yr, 54.7% male) were recruited and 63 used for analysis. Of the thresholds measured with MHT using regular headphones, 44.0% were within 10 dB of the conventional audiogram, compared to 39.3% using noise-canceling headphones. MHT demonstrated best accuracy at high frequencies (4-8 kHz). When screening for moderate hearing loss (PTA >40 dB HL), MHT demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MHT is reliable for identifying moderate hearing loss but lacks precision in detecting thresholds at low frequencies. Noise canceling headphones seem to improve its precision at 4,000 Hz only.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Mobile Applications , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Adult , Prospective Studies , Aged , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/instrumentation , Audiometry/methods , Audiometry/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Reproducibility of Results , Aged, 80 and over
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14203, 2024 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902305

ABSTRACT

Hearing problems are commonly diagnosed with the use of tonal audiometry, which measures a patient's hearing threshold in both air and bone conduction at various frequencies. Results of audiometry tests, usually represented graphically in the form of an audiogram, need to be interpreted by a professional audiologist in order to determine the exact type of hearing loss and administer proper treatment. However, the small number of professionals in the field can severely delay proper diagnosis. The presented work proposes a neural network solution for classification of tonal audiometry data. The solution, based on the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory architecture, has been devised and evaluated for classifying audiometry results into four classes, representing normal hearing, conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, and sensorineural hearing loss. The network was trained using 15,046 test results analysed and categorised by professional audiologists. The proposed model achieves 99.33% classification accuracy on datasets outside of training. In clinical application, the model allows general practitioners to independently classify tonal audiometry results for patient referral. In addition, the proposed solution provides audiologists and otolaryngologists with access to an AI decision support system that has the potential to reduce their burden, improve diagnostic accuracy, and minimise human error.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Neural Networks, Computer , Humans , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Female , Male , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/classification , Adult , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/classification , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Conductive/classification
11.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241253653, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715401

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to preliminarily investigate the associations between performance on the integrated Digit-in-Noise Test (iDIN) and performance on measures of general cognition and working memory (WM). The study recruited 81 older adult hearing aid users between 60 and 95 years of age with bilateral moderate to severe hearing loss. The Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) was used to screen older adults for mild cognitive impairment. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using 2- to 5-digit sequences of the Mandarin iDIN. The differences in SRT between five-digit and two-digit sequences (SRT5-2), and between five-digit and three-digit sequences (SRT5-3), were used as indicators of memory performance. The results were compared to those from the Digit Span Test and Corsi Blocks Tapping Test, which evaluate WM and attention capacity. SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 demonstrated significant correlations with the three cognitive function tests (rs ranging from -.705 to -.528). Furthermore, SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 were significantly higher in participants who failed the MoCA-BC screening compared to those who passed. The findings show associations between performance on the iDIN and performance on memory tests. However, further validation and exploration are needed to fully establish its effectiveness and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction , Hearing Aids , Memory, Short-Term , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Noise/adverse effects , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Age Factors , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Memory , Acoustic Stimulation , Predictive Value of Tests , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold
12.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241252240, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715410

ABSTRACT

In recent years, tools for early detection of irreversible trauma to the basilar membrane during hearing preservation cochlear implant (CI) surgery were established in several clinics. A link with the degree of postoperative hearing preservation in patients was investigated, but patient populations were usually small. Therefore, this study's aim was to analyze data from intraoperative extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings for a larger group.During hearing preservation CI surgery, extracochlear recordings were made before, during, and after CI electrode insertion using a cotton wick electrode placed at the promontory. Before and after insertion, amplitudes and stimulus response thresholds were recorded at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz. During insertion, response amplitudes were recorded at one frequency and one stimulus level. Data from 121 patient ears were analyzed.The key benefit of extracochlear recordings is that they can be performed before, during, and after CI electrode insertion. However, extracochlear ECochG threshold changes before and after CI insertion were relatively small and did not independently correlate well with hearing preservation, although at 250 Hz they added some significant information. Some tendencies-although no significant relationships-were detected between amplitude behavior and hearing preservation. Rising amplitudes seem favorable and falling amplitudes disadvantageous, but constant amplitudes do not appear to allow stringent predictions.Extracochlear ECochG measurements seem to only partially realize expected benefits. The questions now are: do gains justify the effort, and do other procedures or possible combinations lead to greater benefits for patients?


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response , Auditory Threshold , Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing , Humans , Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Adult , Hearing/physiology , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlea/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Predictive Value of Tests , Young Adult , Child , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Aged, 80 and over , Child, Preschool , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation
13.
J Neural Eng ; 21(3)2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729132

ABSTRACT

Objective.This study develops a deep learning (DL) method for fast auditory attention decoding (AAD) using electroencephalography (EEG) from listeners with hearing impairment (HI). It addresses three classification tasks: differentiating noise from speech-in-noise, classifying the direction of attended speech (left vs. right) and identifying the activation status of hearing aid noise reduction algorithms (OFF vs. ON). These tasks contribute to our understanding of how hearing technology influences auditory processing in the hearing-impaired population.Approach.Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models were designed for each task. Two training strategies were employed to clarify the impact of data splitting on AAD tasks: inter-trial, where the testing set used classification windows from trials that the training set had not seen, and intra-trial, where the testing set used unseen classification windows from trials where other segments were seen during training. The models were evaluated on EEG data from 31 participants with HI, listening to competing talkers amidst background noise.Main results.Using 1 s classification windows, DCNN models achieve accuracy (ACC) of 69.8%, 73.3% and 82.9% and area-under-curve (AUC) of 77.2%, 80.6% and 92.1% for the three tasks respectively on inter-trial strategy. In the intra-trial strategy, they achieved ACC of 87.9%, 80.1% and 97.5%, along with AUC of 94.6%, 89.1%, and 99.8%. Our DCNN models show good performance on short 1 s EEG samples, making them suitable for real-world applications. Conclusion: Our DCNN models successfully addressed three tasks with short 1 s EEG windows from participants with HI, showcasing their potential. While the inter-trial strategy demonstrated promise for assessing AAD, the intra-trial approach yielded inflated results, underscoring the important role of proper data splitting in EEG-based AAD tasks.Significance.Our findings showcase the promising potential of EEG-based tools for assessing auditory attention in clinical contexts and advancing hearing technology, while also promoting further exploration of alternative DL architectures and their potential constraints.


Subject(s)
Attention , Auditory Perception , Deep Learning , Electroencephalography , Hearing Loss , Humans , Attention/physiology , Female , Electroencephalography/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Aged , Auditory Perception/physiology , Noise , Adult , Hearing Aids , Speech Perception/physiology , Neural Networks, Computer
14.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 181: 111990, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The newborn hearing screening (NHS) program was globally established for early hearing loss (HL) identification and intervention. Early intervention is essential to minimize or prevent the negative consequences of HL. In Saudi Arabia, the NHS was officially implemented in 2016. Currently, its impact on the timing of cochlear implantations (CIs) in Saudi Arabia remains unclear, and information on potential hospital-related delays affecting early implantation is lacking. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing the NHS on age at CI in children with prelingual deafness in a CI center in Saudi Arabia, and to evaluate the hospital timing in the CI process. METHODS: All pediatric CI users who presented for the first time to the CI committee (CIC) at a tertiary center and received their implants between 2015 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. Date of birth (DOB), date of presentation to the CI committee (DOCIC), and date of CI surgery (DOCIS) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 304 CI children were included in the analysis. Approximately 55 % of the children (n = 167) were screened for HL through the NHS, whereas 45 % of the children (n = 137) were born before the launch of the NHS. Both age at the presentation to the CIC (i.e. difference between DOCIC and DOB) and age at implantation (i.e. difference between DOCIS and DOB) were significantly earlier in children who were screened for HL through the NHS than those who were not screened (P < 0.0001). The time difference between the DOCIC and DOCIS was not significantly different between the screened and unscreened children (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the NHS in the tertiary center has a significant positive effect on age at presentation to the CIC and age at implantation, but not on the actual CI surgery. Further research is needed to reduce the hospital delays before the actual surgery in order to increase the likelihood of children receiving implantation early in their life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Tests , Neonatal Screening , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Saudi Arabia , Infant , Child, Preschool , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
15.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811174

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of auditory neuropathy (AN) patients with normal hearing or mild hearing loss. Methods: Data from Multicenter Study on Clinical Diagnosis and Intervention of Acoustic Neuropathy (registration number: ChiCTR2100050125). According to the Chinese clinical practice guideline of auditory neuropathy (version 2022), these patients divided into two groups: the normal hearing group (PTA Normal, PTAN group, the average hearing threshold<20 dB HL) and the mild hearing loss group (PTA Mild hearing loss, PTAM group, the average hearing threshold between 20-35 dBHL). The audiology characteristics, clinical features, and follow-up were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 8 and SPSS 20.0 software. Results: A total of 75 AN with normal hearing or mild hearing loss were included in this study. The PTAN group consisted of 19 patients (38 ears), including 12 males and 7 females. The average onset age was (16.9±4.5) years old, while the test age was (22.1±5.8) years old for PTAN group. The PTAM group consisted of 56 patients (112 ears), including 29 males and 27 females. The average onset age was (16.2±7.9) years old, while the test age was (23.9±9.0) yeas old for PTAM group. The average hearing threshold of low frequency (0.125-0.5 kHz) was significantly decreased. ABR disappeared in 86.00% (126/150) of the patients. The speech recognition rate was 71.80±22.44% in the PTAN group and 58.08±29.28% in the PTAM group.-SP/AP was 0.98±0.47 in the PTAN and 1.07±0.63 in PTAM group; 40 (53.33%) patients had tinnitus. 29 patients (58 ears) were followed up, including 10 patients (20 ears) in the PTAN group and 19 patients (38 ears) in the PTAM group. There was no significant change in hearing threshold in short-term follow-up (<3 years). With the extension of the disease duration (>3 years), the PTAN group tended to decrease at low frequency, and the PTAM group decreased at high frequency first. The hearing threshold at 0.25 kHz in the PTAN group and 4 kHz in the PTAM group decreased significantly. Conclusions: AN patients with normal hearing or mild hearing loss exhibit abnormal results in audiological examination results, including ABR, electrocochleography and speech discrimination score. A combination of audiological tests should be used to make the diagnosis of AN. With the progression of the disease, AN with normal hearing or mild hearing loss tends to decrease.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Hearing Loss, Central , Humans , Hearing Loss, Central/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Central/physiopathology , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Adolescent , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Child , Middle Aged
16.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 78(8): 529-535, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New standardised measures of self-reported hearing difficulty can be validated against audiometric hearing loss. This study reports the influence of demographic factors (age, sex, race and socioeconomic position (SEP)) on the agreement between audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty. METHODS: Participants were 1558 adults (56.9% female; 20.0% racial minority; mean age 63.7 (SD 14.1) years) from the Medical University of South Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study of Age-Related Hearing Loss (1988-current). Audiometric hearing loss was defined as the average of pure-tone thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz >25 dB HL in the worse ear. Self-reported hearing difficulty was defined as ≥6 points on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI) or RHHI screening version (RHHI-S). We report agreement between audiometric hearing loss and the RHHI(-S), defined by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and observed minus predicted prevalence. Estimates were stratified to age group, sex, race and SEP proxy. RESULTS: The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty were 49.0% and 48.8%, respectively. Accuracy was highest among participants aged <60 (77.6%) versus 60-70 (71.4%) and 70+ (71.9%) years, for white (74.6%) versus minority (68.0%) participants and was similar by sex and SEP proxy. Generally, agreement of audiometric hearing loss and RHHI(-S) self-reported hearing difficulty differed by age, sex and race. CONCLUSIONS: Relationships of audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty vary by demographic factors. These relationships were similar for the full (RHHI) and screening (RHHI-S) versions of this tool.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Self Report , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Adult , Longitudinal Studies , South Carolina/epidemiology , Disability Evaluation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Socioeconomic Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1160, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment (HI) has become a major public health issue in China. Currently, due to the limitations of primary health care, the gold standard for HI diagnosis (pure-tone hearing test) is not suitable for large-scale use in community settings. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a cost-effective HI screening model for the general population using machine learning (ML) methods and data gathered from community-based scenarios, aiming to help improve the hearing-related health outcomes of community residents. METHODS: This study recruited 3371 community residents from 7 health centres in Zhejiang, China. Sixty-eight indicators derived from questionnaire surveys and routine haematological tests were delivered and used for modelling. Seven commonly used ML models (the naive Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), boosting, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO regression)) were adopted and compared to develop the final high-frequency hearing impairment (HFHI) screening model for community residents. The model was constructed with a nomogram to obtain the risk score of the probability of individuals suffering from HFHI. According to the risk score, the population was divided into three risk stratifications (low, medium and high) and the risk factor characteristics of each dimension under different risk stratifications were identified. RESULTS: Among all the algorithms used, the LASSO-based model achieved the best performance on the validation set by attaining an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.847-0.889) and reaching precision, specificity and F-score values all greater than 80%. Five demographic indicators, 7 disease-related features, 5 behavioural factors, 2 environmental exposures, 2 hearing cognitive factors, and 13 blood test indicators were identified in the final screening model. A total of 91.42% (1235/1129) of the subjects in the high-risk group were confirmed to have HI by audiometry, which was 3.99 times greater than that in the low-risk group (22.91%, 301/1314). The high-risk population was mainly characterized as older, low-income and low-educated males, especially those with multiple chronic conditions, noise exposure, poor lifestyle, abnormal blood indices (e.g., red cell distribution width (RDW) and platelet distribution width (PDW)) and liver function indicators (e.g., triglyceride (TG), indirect bilirubin (IBIL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)). An HFHI nomogram was further generated to improve the operability of the screening model for community applications. CONCLUSIONS: The HFHI risk screening model developed based on ML algorithms can more accurately identify residents with HFHI by categorizing them into the high-risk groups, which can further help to identify modifiable and immutable risk factors for residents at high risk of HI and promote their personalized HI prevention or intervention.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Machine Learning , Mass Screening , Humans , China/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Adult , Mass Screening/methods , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 16(1): e1-e8, 2024 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Unavailability of healthcare resources can lead to poor patient outcomes. The latter is true for infants with hearing loss and require early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI). AIM:  To determine the availability and distribution of resources for EHDI in state hospitals in the Eastern Cape (EC) province, South Africa. SETTING:  Sixteen state hospitals (nine district, four regional and three tertiary hospitals). METHODS:  Descriptive cross-sectional survey completed between July 2022 and October 2022. RESULTS:  Thirteen hospitals had audiologists (n = 4) or speech therapists and audiologists (n = 9). Specific to equipment, 10 hospitals had a screening otoacoustic emissions or automated auditory brainstem response, 8 hospitals had diagnostic middle ear analysers and only 3 hospitals had diagnostic auditory brainstem response and/or auditory steady state response. Twelve hospitals did not have visual response audiometry (VRA) and 94% had no hearing aid verification systems. Budget allocations were uneven, with only 10 hospitals, i.e., 4 districts, all regional and 2 tertiary hospitals being allocated varying amounts. Subsequently, only 50% provided newborn hearing screening, 56% provided diagnostic evaluations and 14 hospitals fitted hearing aids. CONCLUSION:  Results revealed a limited and uneven distribution of resources, which negatively impacted the provision of EHDI. Even distribution of healthcare resources and further research aimed at strengthening hearing health services is recommended as these could potentially improve equitable access to EHDI and the overall quality of healthcare provided.Contribution: This study highlights the need for even distribution of resources and strengthening of health systems, especially in the dawn of the National Health Insurance.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Hearing , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , South Africa , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Tests , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Neonatal Screening
19.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 71(1): e1-e4, 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572898

ABSTRACT

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes are recognised as the standard of care for newborns and infants presenting with hearing impairment, globally. However, widespread implementation of these programmes is far from being realised and faces numerous challenges within the South African context. The United Nations' sustainable development goal 3.8 and South Africa's national development plan seek to achieve equitable access to healthcare service, including EHDI. However, healthcare access is a complex concept which encompasses the dimensions: availability, affordability, acceptability and accommodation in healthcare. South Africa has made great progress towards universal implementation of EHDI programmes. Despite this progress, availability and affordability of these programmes are limited and their acceptability has received limited research focus in this context. Furthermore, accommodation of caregivers, as co-drivers of EHDI programmes and ensuring that EHDI programmes are linguistically and culturally congruent have also been overlooked within the South African context.Contribution: Increased robust efforts in improving access through availability and affordability of EHDI programmes are warranted in South Africa. However, improving access to these programmes through availability and affordability initiatives alone will not result in a pragmatic improvement in their accessibility. Acceptability of these programmes and accommodations such as involving caregivers and family members of children with hearing impairment as equal partners in EHDI programmes and being cognisant of their linguistic and cultural needs must be considered.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Hearing , Infant , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , South Africa , Hearing Tests , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Linguistics
20.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 71(1): e1-e9, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Hearing impairment is an invisible disability affecting one in five people globally. Its ability to affect participation in activities of daily living means that it requires prompt identification and intervention. OBJECTIVE:  This article aims to define the process of accessing audiologists from the onset of symptoms for adults with hearing impairment in a peri-urban community in South Africa. METHOD:  Twenty-three participants were recruited through purposive sampling from an audiology department of a public hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide, and data were mapped according to the participants' responses from the onset of ear and hearing symptoms to the point of audiologist consultation for analysis. RESULTS:  Seventeen (74%) participants had long journeys to accessing the audiologist after seeking help from multiple providers, with those with short journeys (26%) being referred mostly by public healthcare providers. Despite participants being from one peri-urban community, their journeys were influenced by socio-economics, health illiteracy and other structural factors. Finally, Ear-Nose-Throat specialists linked participants with audiology services. CONCLUSION:  Accessing audiology services is a complex process in some contexts. The disparities in the social environment, lifestyle factors and pluralistic healthcare models influence access to audiologists. Healthcare providers must take cognisance of the journeys of adults with hearing impairment in their clinical interventions. Universal health coverage, in the form of the planned National Health Insurance (NHI) for all South African citizens, will play an important role in addressing the societal inequalities in accessing healthcare. Factors leading to long journeys should be addressed to facilitate early intervention.Contribution: The study raises implications for the planned NHI in South Africa, suggesting that universal health coverage could play a vital role in addressing societal inequalities in accessing healthcare, including audiology services.


Subject(s)
Audiology , Hearing Loss , Adult , Humans , South Africa , Activities of Daily Living , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Audiologists
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...