Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (6): 51-57, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888019

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia is defined as a projection of an organ through the inguinal canal. This can be incarcerated as a consequence of continuous inflammation of the hernial sac, which will prevent its return, causing damage to the venous and lymphatic return of the viscera. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily accessible inflammatory biomarker obtained from blood cell counts. Therefore, the objective was to determine if the NLR is useful as a predictor of intestinal resection in incarcerated inguinal hernias. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An observational, analytical, diagnostic test and retrospective study was carried out in a hospital in northern Peru from January 2013 to August 2019 in the Department of General Surgery and Emergency Surgery and Critical Care. Patients diagnosed with unilateral inguinal hernia with intestinal obstruction were included. For the relationship between the event and the exposure, it was analyzed using Chi square (χ2) and T-Student. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the NLR as well as the area under the ROC curve were found to determine the predictive accuracy. RESULTS: 161 patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia were studied: group I (20 patients with intestinal resection) and group II (141 patients without intestinal resection). The mean age in groups I and II were 69±16 and 60±17 years (p<0.05); the frequency in males was 70% in group I and 76% in group II (p>0.05). Intestinal obstruction and duration of incarceration >24 hours and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio demonstrated significant differences. With respect to NLR taking a cut-off point ≥6.5, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 93.62%, a positive predictive value of 62.5% and a negative predictive value of 96.35% were observed; In addition, when analyzing with the ROC curve, a value of 5.14 was obtained as a predictor of intestinal resection with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 84.4% (p<0.001). Therefore, the NLR >5.14 predicts intestinal resection in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernias with an area under the curve of 0.92 at the Belen Hospital of Trujillo. CONCLUSIONS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is useful for predicting intestinal resection with a diagnostic accuracy of 92%.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Intestinal Obstruction , Lymphocytes , Neutrophils , Humans , Male , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/diagnosis , Hernia, Inguinal/blood , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Intestinal Obstruction/blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Lymphocyte Count , Peru , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Intestines/surgery , ROC Curve
2.
Acta Cir Bras ; 34(2): e201900206, 2019 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30843939

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare open Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair to treat primary unilateral hernia, regarding systemic inflammatory response, postoperative pain, and complications. METHODS: A non-randomized prospective cohort study, with the preoperative and postoperative (24 hours) collection of blood samples for C reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), leukocyte and neutrophil analysis. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to quantify the level of pain, and the operative time was correlated with the inflammatory response. VAS and CRP were also obtained on the 8th postoperative day. RESULTS: Groups were homogeneous regarding preoperative characteristics. There were no differences between groups in 24h values of CRP, IL-6, leukocytes, neutrophils or VAS. Similarly, CRP and VAS did not differ between groups on the 8th postoperative day. However, the operative time for laparoscopic hernia repair was longer than the time for the open procedure. There was a weak correlation (r coefficient 0.31) between the duration of the surgical procedure and the VAS score at the eighth day. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in the inflammatory response, pain scores, or complications between groups. We conclude that there is no advantage performing a primary unilateral hernia repair by laparoscopy.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Pain, Postoperative , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein , Female , Hernia, Inguinal/blood , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Humans , Interleukin-6 , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Operative Time , Pain, Postoperative/blood , Prospective Studies , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale
3.
Acta cir. bras ; Acta cir. bras;34(2): e201900206, 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-989060

ABSTRACT

Abstract Purpose: To compare open Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair to treat primary unilateral hernia, regarding systemic inflammatory response, postoperative pain, and complications. Methods: A non-randomized prospective cohort study, with the preoperative and postoperative (24 hours) collection of blood samples for C reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), leukocyte and neutrophil analysis. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to quantify the level of pain, and the operative time was correlated with the inflammatory response. VAS and CRP were also obtained on the 8th postoperative day. Results: Groups were homogeneous regarding preoperative characteristics. There were no differences between groups in 24h values of CRP, IL-6, leukocytes, neutrophils or VAS. Similarly, CRP and VAS did not differ between groups on the 8th postoperative day. However, the operative time for laparoscopic hernia repair was longer than the time for the open procedure. There was a weak correlation (r coefficient 0.31) between the duration of the surgical procedure and the VAS score at the eighth day. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in the inflammatory response, pain scores, or complications between groups. We conclude that there is no advantage performing a primary unilateral hernia repair by laparoscopy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/blood , Laparoscopy/methods , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , C-Reactive Protein , Biomarkers/blood , Prospective Studies , Interleukin-6 , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Operative Time , Visual Analog Scale , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Hernia, Inguinal/blood , Length of Stay
4.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 01 set. 1915. 104 p. ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | Coleciona SUS, IMNS | ID: biblio-923352
5.
s.n; s.n; s.d. 85 p.
Thesis in Portuguese | Coleciona SUS, IMNS | ID: biblio-923353
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL