Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.054
Filter
1.
J Hosp Med ; 19(6): 508-512, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623767

ABSTRACT

It is known that transgender people experience health inequalities. Disparities in hospital outcomes impacting transgender individuals have been inadequately explored. We conducted this retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (01/2018-12/2019) to compare in-hospital mortality and utilization variables between cisgender and transgender individuals using regression analyses. Approximately two-thirds of hospitalizations for transgender patients (n = 10,245) were for psychiatric diagnoses. Compared to cisgender patients, there were no significant differences in adjusted means differences (aMD) in length of stay (LOS) (aMD = -0.29; p = .16) or total charges (aMD = -$486; p = .56). An additional 4870 transgender patients were admitted for medical diagnoses. Transgender and cisgender individuals had similar adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for in-hospital mortality (aOR = 0.96; p = .88) and total hospital charges (aMD = -$3118; p = .21). However, transgender individuals had longer LOS (aMD = +0.46 days; confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.90; p = .04). When comparing mortality and resource utilization between cisgender and transgender individuals, differences were negligible.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Transgender Persons , Humans , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , Male , United States , Retrospective Studies , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data
2.
Burns ; 50(4): 823-828, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to establish the significance of social determinants of health and prevalent co-morbidities on multiple indicators for quality of care in patients admitted to the Burn and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of population group data for patients admitted at the Burn and Surgical ICU from January 1, 2016, to November 18, 2019. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality, 30-day readmission, and hospital charges. Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables were used to compare population health groups. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 487 burn and 510 surgical patients. When comparing ICU patients, we observed significantly higher mean hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) in BICU v. SICU patients with a history of mental health ($93,259.40 v. $50,503.36, p = 0.013 and 16.28 v. 9.16 days, p = 0.0085), end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) ($653,871.05 v. $75,746.35, p = 0.0047 and 96.15 v. 17.53 days, p = 0.0104), sepsis ($267,979.60 v. $99,154.41, p = <0.001 and 39.1 v. 18.42 days, p = 0.0043), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) ($757,740.50 v. $117,816.40, p = <0.001 and 93.11 v. 20.21 days, p = 0.002). Also, higher mortality was observed in burn patients with ESRD, ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), sepsis, VTE, and diabetes mellitus. 30-day-readmissions were greater among burn patients with a history of mental health, drug dependence, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new insights into the variability of outcomes between burn patients treated in different critical care settings, underlining the influence of comorbidities on these outcomes. By comparing burn patients in the BICU with those in the SICU, we aim to highlight how differences in patient backgrounds, including the quality of care received, contribute to these outcomes. This comparison underscores the need for tailored healthcare strategies that consider the unique challenges faced by each patient group, aiming to mitigate disparities in health outcomes and healthcare spending. Further research to develop relevant and timely interventions that can improve these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Burns , Comorbidity , Critical Illness , Length of Stay , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/economics , Burns/therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(4): 692-701, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353528

ABSTRACT

AIM: Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that patients experience due to medical treatment. Financial toxicity has yet to be characterized among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing surgical management of their disease. This study investigated the risk of financial toxicity associated with undergoing surgery for IBD. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2019. Adult patients who underwent IBD-related surgery were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (10th Revision) diagnostic and procedure codes and stratified into privately insured and uninsured groups. The primary outcome was risk of financial toxicity, defined as hospital admission charges that constituted 40% or more of patient's post-subsistence income. Secondary outcomes included total hospital admission cost and predictors of financial toxicity. RESULTS: The analytical cohort consisted of 6412 privately insured and 3694 uninsured patients. Overall median hospital charges were $21 628 (interquartile range $14 758-$35 386). Risk of financial toxicity was 86.5% among uninsured patients and 0% among insured patients. Predictors of financial toxicity included emergency admission, being in the lowest residential income quartile and having ulcerative colitis (compared to Crohn's disease). Additional predictors were being of Black race or male sex. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a serious consequence of IBD-related surgery among uninsured patients. Given the pervasive nature of this consequence, future steps to support uninsured patients receiving surgery, in particular emergency surgery, related to their IBD are needed to protect this group from financial risk.


Subject(s)
Hospital Charges , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Medically Uninsured , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , United States , Middle Aged , Adult , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/surgery , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/economics , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colitis, Ulcerative/economics , Cost of Illness , Crohn Disease/surgery , Crohn Disease/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Financial Stress/economics , Aged , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(4): 669-674, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372024

ABSTRACT

AIM: Same day discharge (SDD) for colorectal surgery shows increasing promise in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive surgery. It has become increasingly relevant due to the constraints posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to compare SDD and postoperative day 1 (POD1) discharge to understand the clinical outcomes and financial impact on factors such as cost, charge, revenue, contribution margin and readmission. METHOD: A retrospective review of colectomies was performed at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 143). Two populations were identified: SDD (n = 51) and POD1 (n = 92). Patients were selected by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) and Diagnosis Related Grouper (DRG) codes. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference favouring SDD in total hospital cost (p < 0.0001), average direct costs (p < 0.0001) and average charges (p < 0.0016). SDD average hospital costs were $8699 (values in USD throughout) compared with $11 652 for POD 1 (p < 0.0001), and average SDD hospital charges were $85 506 compared with $97 008 for POD1 (p < 0.0016). The net revenue for SDD was $22 319 while for POD1 it was $26 173 (p = 0.14). Upon comparison of contribution margins (SDD $13 620 vs. POD1 $14 522), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). There were no identified statistically significant differences in operating room time, robotic console time, readmission rates or surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Amidst the pandemic-related constraints, we found that SDD was associated with lower hospital costs and comparable contribution margins compared with POD1. Additionally, the study was unable to identify any significant difference between operating time, readmissions, and surgical complications when performing SDD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colectomy , Hospital Costs , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/economics , Female , Male , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Middle Aged , Colectomy/economics , Colectomy/methods , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Aged , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Adult
5.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(5): 511-518, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113134

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: A 2018 Executive Order calling for price transparency required hospitals to publicly provide chargemasters, which are detailed lists of standard price listings for billable medical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate price listing variations in common urogynecology procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of chargemasters obtained between February and April 2020 from hospitals across 5 states chosen to reflect the diversity of health systems in the United States. Hospital characteristic and quality metric data were obtained from the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services websites. Current Procedural Terminology codes and procedure names for 9 urogynecologic procedures were used to search each chargemaster and extract price listings. Price listings were compared with data on quality, population demographics, and hospital characteristics to determine if any significant relationships existed. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-four chargemasters were identified. Price listings for most procedures differed significantly across the 5 states, including colpocleisis, cystoscopy with chemodenervation, diagnostic cystoscopy, diverticulectomy, sacral neuromodulation, midurethral sling, and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Price listings were significantly higher in urban hospitals than rural hospitals for 6 procedures. No significant association was seen with price listing and quality measures for most procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Listed prices varied for several urogynecologic procedures. Some of this variation is associated with hospital characteristics such as urban setting. However, notably, price listing was not associated with quality. Further investigation of chargemaster price listings with hospital characteristics and quality metrics and with what is actually paid by patients is imperative for patients to navigate charges.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , United States , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data
6.
South Med J ; 116(7): 524-529, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37400095

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The impact of race on patients presenting to North American hospitals with postliver transplant complications/failure (PLTCF) has not been studied fully. We compared in-hospital mortality and resource utilization outcomes between White and Black patients hospitalized with PLTCF. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that evaluated the years 2016 and 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample. Regression analysis was used to determine in-hospital mortality and resource utilization. RESULTS: There were 10,805 hospitalizations for adults with liver transplants who presented with PLTCF. White and Black patients with PLTCF made up 7925 (73.3%) hospitalizations from this population. Among this group, 6480 were White (81.7%) and 1445 were Black (18.2%). Blacks were younger than Whites (mean age ± standard error of the mean: 46.8 ± 1.1 vs 53.6 ± 0.39 years, P < 0.01). Blacks were more likely to be female (53.9% vs 37.4%, P < 0.01). Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were not significantly different (scores ≥3: 46.7% vs 44.2%, P = 0.83). Blacks had significantly higher odds for in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.9, confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.1; P < 0.01). Hospital charges were higher for Blacks compared with Whites (adjusted mean difference $48,432; 95% CI $2708-$94,157, P = 0.03). Blacks had significantly longer lengths of hospital stays (adjusted mean difference 3.1 days, 95% CI 1.1-5.1, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with White patients hospitalized for PLTCF, Black patients had higher in-hospital mortality and resource use. Investigation into causes leading to this health disparity is needed to improve in-hospital outcomes.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Hospital Mortality , Liver Transplantation , White , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/ethnology , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , White/statistics & numerical data , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization/economics , Facilities and Services Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
7.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 22-27, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For-profit (FP) trauma centers (TCs) charge more for trauma care than not-for-profit (NFP) centers. We sought to determine charges, length of stay (LOS), and complications associations with TC ownership status (FP, NFP, and government) for three diagnoses among patients with overall low injury severity. METHODS: Adult patients treated at TCs with an International Classification of Diseases-based injury severity score (ICISS) survival probability ≥ 0.85 were identified. Only those who with a principal diagnosis of femur, tibial or rib fractures were included. RESULTS: Total charges were significantly higher at FP centers than NFP and lower at government centers (89.6% and -12.8%, respectively). FP TCs had a 12.5% longer LOS and government TCs had a 20.4% longer LOS than NFP TCs. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to FP TCs with mild/moderate femur, tibial, or rib fractures experienced higher charges and increased LOS compared with government or NFP centers. There was no difference in overall complication rates.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation/economics , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Ownership/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/economics , Government Programs/economics , Government Programs/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Private/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Trauma Centers/economics , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Young Adult
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(12): e2137390, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902037

ABSTRACT

Importance: To improve health care price transparency and promote cost-conscious selection of health care organizations and practitioners, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) required that hospitals share payer-specific negotiated prices for selected shoppable health services by January 2021. While this regulation improves price transparency, it is unclear whether disclosed prices reflect total costs of care, since many hospital-based services are delivered and billed separately by independent practitioners or other health care entities. Objective: To assess the extent to which prices disclosed under the new hospital price transparency regulation are correlated with total costs of care among commercially insured individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a large database of commercial claims from 2018 to analyze encounters at US hospitals for shoppable health care services for which price disclosure is required by CMS. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to February 2021. Exposures: Whether the service was billed by the hospital or another entity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were the percentage of encounters with at least 1 service billed by an entity other than the hospital providing care, number of billing entities, amounts billed by nonhospital entities, and the correlation between hospital and nonhospital reimbursements. Results: The study analyzed 4 545 809 encounters for shoppable care. Independent health care entities were involved in 7.6% (95% CI, 6.7% to 8.4%) to 42.4% (95% CI, 39.1% to 45.6%) of evaluation and management encounters, 15.9% (95% CI, 15.8% to 16%) to 22.2% (95% CI, 22% to 22.4%) of laboratory and pathology services, 64.9% (95% CI, 64.2% to 65.7%) to 87.2% (95% CI, 87.1% to 87.3%) of radiology services, and more than 80% of most medicine and surgery services. The median (IQR) reimbursement of independent practitioners ranged from $61 ($52-$102) to $412 ($331-$466) for evaluation and management, $5 ($4-$6) to $7 ($4-$12) for laboratory and pathology, $26 ($20-$32) to $210 ($170-$268) for radiology, and $47 ($21-$103) to $9545 ($7750-$18 277) for medicine and surgery. The reimbursement for services billed by the hospital was not strongly correlated with the reimbursement of independent clinicians, ranging from r = -0.11 (95% CI, -0.69 to 0.56) to r = 0.53 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.78). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that independent practitioners were frequently involved in the delivery of shoppable hospital-based care, and their reimbursement may have represented a substantial portion of total costs of care. These findings suggest that disclosed hospital reimbursement was usually not correlated with total cost of care, limiting the potential benefits of the hospital price transparency rule for improving consumer decision-making.


Subject(s)
Disclosure , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Managed Care Programs/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , State Health Plans/economics , United States
9.
Health Serv Res ; 56(5): 953-961, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34350589

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare approaches to estimating the service delivery cost of emergency department (ED) visits from total charge data only. DATA SOURCES: The 2013-2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) public use files. STUDY DESIGN: Compare a baseline approach (requiring cost-center-level charge detail) and four alternative methods (relying on total charges only) for estimating ED visit costs. Estimation errors are calculated after applying each method to a sample of ED visits, treating estimates from the baseline approach as the "true" cost. Performance metrics are calculated at the visit and hospital levels. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The charges, revenue center codes, and patient/hospital characteristics were extracted from the SEDD. Detailed costs and charges were extracted from HCRIS public use files. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Baseline ("true") ED visit costs increased from $383 to $420 per visit between 2013 and 2017. Three methods performed comparatively well estimating mean cost per visit. The method using an overall cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) for all ancillary cost centers without regression adjustment (ANC-CCR) performed the worst, overestimating "true" costs by $63-$113 per visit. The other three methods, which used CCRs computed from selected cost centers, exhibited much smaller bias, with two of the methods yielding estimates within $2 of the "true" cost in 2017. Compared with ANC-CCR, the other three methods had more compact estimation error distributions. The estimated mean visit costs from all four methods have relatively small statistical variance, with 95% confidence intervals for mean cost in a hospital with 25,000 ED visits ranging between $4 and $7. CONCLUSIONS: When cost-center-level charge detail for ED visits is unavailable, alternative methods relying on total ED charges can estimate ED service costs for patient and hospital segments.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humans , Models, Economic , Research Design , United States
10.
Ann Surg ; 274(3): e245-e252, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397456

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine real-life patterns of care and patient outcomes associated with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in New York State (NYS). BACKGROUND: Although robotic assistance may offer some technological advantages, RACs are associated with higher procedural costs and longer operating times compared to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs). Evidence on long-term patient outcomes after RAC from large population-based datasets remains limited and inconsistent. METHODS: Using NYS inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2009-2017), we conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine patterns of utilization, complications, and secondary procedures following cholecystectomies. RESULTS: Among 299,306 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in NYS between 2009 and 2017, one thousand one hundred eighteen (0.4%) were robot-assisted. Compared to those undergoing LC, RAC patients were older, travelled further for surgery, and were more likely to have public insurance and preoperative comorbidities. RAC versus LC patients were more significantly likely to have conversions to open procedure (4.9% vs 2.8%), bile duct injuries (1.3% vs 0.4%), and major reconstructive interventions (0.6% vs 0.1%), longer median length of stay (3 vs 1 day), readmissions (7.3% vs 4.4%), and higher 12-month post-index surgery hospital charges (P < 0.01 for all estimates). Other postoperative complications decreased over time for LC but remained unchanged for RAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving RAC in NYS experienced higher rates of complications compared to LC patients. Addressing patient-, surgeon-, and system-level factors associated with intra/postoperative complications and applying recently promulgated safe cholecystectomy strategies coupled with advanced imaging modalities like fluorescence cholangiography to RAC may improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Comorbidity , Conversion to Open Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
11.
Med Care ; 59(8): 704-710, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33935253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care expenditures in the United States are high and rising, with significant increases over the decades. The delivery, organization, and financing of the health care system has evolved over time due to technological innovation, policy changes, patient preferences, altering payment mechanisms, shifting demographics, and other factors. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine trends over time in health care utilization and expenditures in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN: This analysis employs descriptive statistics to examine 5 decades of health care utilization and expenditure data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for 1977-2017. MEASURES: Measures include utilization and expenditures (not charges) for inpatient, emergency department, outpatient physician, outpatient nonphysician, office-based physician, dental, and out-of-pocket retail prescription drugs. RESULTS: We demonstrate that while health care expenditures have increased significantly overall and by type of care, utilization trends are less pronounced. The population of the United States grew 53% between 1977 and 2017, while annual total expenditures on health care increased by 208%. Amidst attention to out-of-pocket exposure for unexpected medical care bills, out-of-pocket payments for care have declined from 32% in 1977 to 12% in 2017 but increased in amount. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides the first extended snapshot of the dynamics of health care utilization and expenditures in the United States. Aspects of health care are much different today than in previous decades, yet the inpatient setting still dominates the expenditures.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/trends , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/trends , Dental Care/economics , Dental Care/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Prescription Drugs/economics , United States/epidemiology
12.
Clin Interv Aging ; 16: 833-841, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34040360

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of peripheral nerve block (PNB) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on one-year mortality and walking ability of elderly hip fracture patients after hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients ≥65 years who underwent unilateral hip arthroplasty due to femoral neck fracture, using either PNB or SA from 2014 to 2019, were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, and results of preoperative screening were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a ratio of 1:1 for PNB and SA groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 90-day, and one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included walking ability in the first postoperative year, major complications, length of stay, and the cost of hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixteen patients were included, of whom 200 received SA and 116 received PNB. Eighty-nine patients in each group were matched after PSM. Patients in the PNB group showed significantly lower risks of death in 30 days (2.2% vs 10.1%, P=0.029) and 90 days (3.4% vs 12.4%, P=0.026) after hip arthroplasty, when compared to the SA group. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality, walking ability, major complications, and length of stay. Higher hospitalization cost was found in the PNB group (53,828.21 CNY vs 59,278.83 CNY, P=0.024). One-year accumulated survival rate was higher in the PNB group without reaching a significant level. CONCLUSION: PNB was related to lower 30- and 90-day mortality but higher hospitalization cost in elderly hip fracture patients after hip arthroplasty. However, the anesthesia types were not associated with one-year mortality, one-year walking ability, major complications, and length of stay.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/mortality , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Nerve Block/statistics & numerical data , Walking/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 151: 39-44, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34030884

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can present with various clinical symptoms, including chest pain, syncope, and sudden cardiac death, particularly in those without atherosclerotic risk factors. In this contemporary analysis, we aimed to identify the causes and predictors of 30-day hospital readmission in SCAD patients. We utilized the latest Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 - 2017 to identify patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of SCAD. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Among 795 patients admitted with a principal discharge diagnosis of SCAD, 85 (11.3%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge from index admission (69.8% women, mean age of 54.3 ± 0.8). More than half of the readmissions (57%) were cardiac-related readmissions. Common cardiac causes for 30-day hospital readmission were acute coronary syndrome (27.3%), chest pain/unspecified angina (24.6%), heart failure (17.5%), and recurrent SCAD (8.3%). In conclusion, we found that following hospitalization for SCAD, almost one-tenth of patients were readmitted within 30 days, largely due to cardiac cause . Risk stratifying patients with SCAD, identifying high-risk features or atypical phenotypes of SCAD, and using appropriate management strategies may prevent hospital readmissions and reduce healthcare-related costs. Further studies are warranted to confirm these causes of readmission in SCAD patients.


Subject(s)
Anemia/epidemiology , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/therapy , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Obesity/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/congenital , Angina Pectoris/epidemiology , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/economics , Recurrence , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/therapy
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(15): e25206, 2021 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847618

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Primarily we aimed to examine the crude and standardized schizophrenia hospitalization trend from 2005 to 2014. We hypothesized that there will be a statistically significant linear trend in hospitalization rates for schizophrenia from 2005 to 2014. Secondarily we also examined trends in hospitalization by race/ethnicity, age, gender, as well as trends in hospitalization Length of Stay (LOS) and inflation adjusted cost.In this observational study, we used Nationwide Inpatient Sample data and International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revisions codes for Schizophrenia, which revealed 6,122,284 cases for this study. Outcomes included crude and standardized hospitalization rates, race/ethnicity, age, cost, and LOS. The analysis included descriptive statistics, indirect standardization, Rao-Scott Chi-Square test, t-test, and adjusted linear regression trend.Hospitalizations were most prevalent for individuals ages 45-64 (38.8%), African Americans were overrepresented (25.8% of hospitalizations), and the gender distribution was nearly equivalent. Mean LOS was 9.08 days (95% confidence interval 8.71-9.45). Medicare was the primary payer for most hospitalizations (55.4%), with most of the costs ranging from $10,000-$49,999 (57.1%). The crude hospitalization rates ranged from 790-1142/100,000 admissions, while the US 2010 census standardized rates were 380-552/100,000 from 2005-2014. Linear regression trend analysis showed no significant difference in trend for race/ethnicity, age, nor gender (P > .001). The hospitalizations' overall rates increased while LOS significantly decreased, while hospitalization costs and Charlson's co-morbidity index increased (P < .001).From 2005-2014, the overall US hospitalization rates significantly increased. Over this period, observed disparities in hospitalizations for middle-aged and African Americans were unchanged, and LOS has gone down while costs have gone up. Further studies addressing the important disparities in race/ethnicity and age and reducing costs of acute hospitalization are needed.


Subject(s)
Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Schizophrenia/ethnology , Schizophrenia/mortality , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 42(5): 1026-1032, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688980

ABSTRACT

Myelomeningocele (MMC) and congenital heart disease (CHD) are independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality in the newborn period and each can require significant operations shortly after birth. Few studies have examined the impact of these combined lesions. We sought to examine the incidence of CHD in patients with MMC, and to evaluate length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and mortality. Using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File, ~ 6.9 million newborn records between 1/1999 and 12/2016 were examined. Hospitalizations were classified as MMC without CHD (n = 3054), CHD without MMC (n = 72,266), and MMC with CHD (n = 171). The birth prevalence of CHD with MMC was 0.3/10,000 live hospital births, with 5% of patients with MMC having CHD, and 0.2% of those with CHD having MMC. There was increased LOS in patients with both MMC and CHD (median 15 days, IQR 5-31), compared to CHD without MMC (median 6 days, IQR 2-20) and MMC without CHD (median 8 days, IQR 1-14) and higher total hospital charges (median $95,007, IQR $26,731-$222,660) compared to CHD without MMC (median $27,726, $6463-$118,370) and MMC without CHD (median $40,066, IQR $5744-$97,490). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with MMC and CHD (22.2% compared to 3.1% in MMC without CHD and 4.1% in CHD without MMC). Significance remained when limiting for patients without genetic conditions or additional major birth defects. MMC with CHD in the newborn compared to either CHD or MMC alone is associated with longer LOS, higher charges, and increased mortality.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/mortality , Meningomyelocele/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/economics , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Meningomyelocele/economics , Meningomyelocele/surgery , Prevalence , Texas/epidemiology
17.
Am J Emerg Med ; 45: 92-99, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33677266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of a novel communication and triage pathway called fast track dialysis (FTD) on the length of stay (LOS), resource utilization, and charges for unscheduled hemodialysis for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Prospective and retrospective cohorts of ESRD patients meeting requirements of routine or urgent hemodialysis at a tertiary academic hospital from September 25th, 2016 to September 25th, 2018 in 1 year cohorts. Two sample t-tests were used to compare most outcomes of the cohorts with a Mann-Whitney U test used for skewed data. Nephrology group outcomes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. RESULTS: There were 98 encounters in the historical cohort and 143 encounters in the fast track dialysis cohort. FTD had significantly lowered median ED LOS (4.05 h, vs 5.3 h, p < 0.001), median hospital LOS (12.8 h vs 27 h, p < 0.001), time to hemodialysis (4.78 h vs 7.29 h, p < 0.001), and median hospital charges ($26,040 vs $30,747, p < 0.016). The FTD cohort had increased 30 day ED return for each encounter compared to the historical cohort (1.85 visits vs 0.73 visits, p < 0.001), however no significant increase in 1 year ED visits (6.52 visits vs 5.80, p = 0.4589) or 1 year readmissions (5.89 readmissions vs 4.81 readmissions, p = 0.3584). Most nephrology groups had significantly lower time to hemodialysis order placement and time to start hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach with key stakeholders using a standard pathway can lead to improved efficiency in throughput, reduced charges, and hospital resource utilization for patients needing urgent or routine hemodialysis. A study with a dedicated geographic observation unit for protocolized short stay patients including conditions ranging from low risk chest pain to transient ischemic events that incorporates FTD patients under this protocol should be considered.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Time-to-Treatment , Female , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Triage
18.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 41(1): 14-22, Jan.-Mar. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286976

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective Transanal hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy (ligation anopexy [LA]) and open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) can both be performed under local anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact and the cost-effectiveness of performing these techniques in an ambulatory setting of an Italian academic center on the postoperative outcome. Methods A series of 122 consecutive patients with grades II and III hemorrhoidal disease undergoing ambulatory surgical treatment of hemorrhoids in 2015 to 2018 (group A) was comparedwith 122 patients operated at the same institution in the same period (group H) in a hospital setting. The primary outcome was the number of days required to return to work/daily activities. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain and complications, costeffectiveness, patient satisfaction, and recurrence at 12 months. In group A, all the procedures were performed under local anesthesia with early discharge. In group H, the procedureswere performed under general or loco-regional anesthesia with hospital admission. Results The mean number of days required to return to work/daily activities was 8.4 ± 4.8 days in group A, compared with 12.5 ± 3 days in group H (p<0.001). The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 1 week, 2 and 3 weeks, and 1 month after surgery was lower for patients undergoing LA in the ambulatory setting (p<0.01). We observedmore postoperative complications in hospitalized (12.5%) than in ambulatory patients (7.5%) (p<0.001). The total mean direct costs per patient were significantly lower in the ambulatory setting versus the hospital stay group (351.3 versus 1,746 euros). Conclusion Implementing ambulatory surgery for hemorrhoids is feasible, safe, and cost-effective.


Resumo Objetivo A ligação transanal da artéria hemorroidária com mucopexia e a hemorroidectomia aberta (HA) podem ser realizadas em anestesia local. O objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar o impacto no resultado pós-operatório e a relação custo-eficácia da realização destas técnicas em ambiente ambulatorial de um centro acadêmico italiano no desfecho pós-operatório. Métodos Uma série de 122 pacientes consecutivos com patologia hemorroidária de graus II e III submetidos a cirurgia de hemorroidas em regime ambulatório de 2015 a 2018 (grupo A) foi comparada com 122 pacientes operados na mesma instituição no mesmo período (grupo H) por hospitalização. O desfecho primário foi o número de dias necessários para regressar ao trabalho/atividades diárias. Os desfechos secundários incluíram dor e complicações pós-operatórias, custo-eficácia, satisfação do paciente, e recidiva aos 12 meses. No grupo A, todos os procedimentos foram realizados em anestesia local. No grupo H, os procedimentos foram realizados em anestesia geral ou loco-regional. Resultados A espera média para o regresso ao trabalho foi de 8,4 ± 4,8 dias no grupo A em comparação com 12,5 ± 3 dias no grupo H (p<0,001). A pontuação na escala visual analógica (EVA) da dor 1 semana, 2 e 3 semanas, e 1 mês após a cirurgia foi mais baixa para os pacientes submetidos a cirurgia de ligadura com anopexia em ambiente ambulatorial (p<0,01). Observamosmais complicações pós-operatórias empacientes hospitalizados (12,5%) do que em pacientes ambulatórios (7,5%) (p<0,001). Os custos diretosmédios totais por paciente foram mais baixos em ambiente ambulatório do que no grupo de hospitalização (351,3 contra 1.746 euros). Conclusão A implementação da cirurgia ambulatória para hemorroidas é possível, segura e rentável.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Costs and Cost Analysis , Hemorrhoidectomy/methods , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery/economics , Treatment Outcome , Hemorrhoids/economics
19.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 34(2): 183-186, 2021 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544538

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in this population contributes to significant healthcare utilization, including emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and ICU care. Comorbid psychiatric illnesses (CPI) are additional risks for increased healthcare utilization. While CPI increased risk for DKA hospitalization and readmission, there are no data evaluating the relationship between CPI and hospital outcomes. We hypothesized that adolescents with T1DM and CPI admitted for DKA have increased length of stay (LOS) and higher charges compared to those without CPI. METHODS: Retrospective review of 2000-2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Databases (KID). Patients 10-21 years old admitted with ICD-9 codes for DKA or severe diabetes (250.1-250.33) with and without ICD-9 codes for depression (296-296.99, 311) and anxiety (300-300.9). Comparisons of LOS, mortality, and charges between groups (No CPI, Depression and Anxiety) were made with one way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and χ2. RESULTS: There were 79,673 admissions during the study period: 68,573 (86%) No CPI, 8,590 (10.7%) Depression and 12,510 (15.7%) Anxiety. Female patients comprised 58.2% (n=46,343) of total admissions, 66% of the Depression group, and 71% of the Anxiety group. Patients with depression or anxiety were older and had longer LOS and higher mean charges (p<0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Comorbid depression or anxiety are associated with significantly longer LOS and higher charges in adolescents with T1DM hospitalized for DKA. This study adds to the prior findings of worse outcomes for patients with both T1DM and CPI, emphasizing the importance of identifying and treating these comorbid conditions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/pathology , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Comorbidity , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/economics , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
J Med Econ ; 24(1): 308-317, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate health outcomes and the economic burden of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis code for COVID-19 (ICD-10 code U07.1) from 1 April to 31 October 2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare COVID-19 Database. Patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics, and concomitant medical conditions were assessed. Hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, and hospital costs were evaluated overall and stratified by age groups, insurance types, and 4 COVID-19 disease progression states based on intensive care unit (ICU) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) usage. RESULTS: Of the 173,942 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the median age was 63 years, 51.0% were male, and 48.5% were covered by Medicare. The most prevalent concomitant medical conditions were cardiovascular disease (73.5%), hypertension (64.8%), diabetes (40.7%), obesity (27.0%), and chronic kidney disease (24.2%). Approximately one-fifth (21.9%) of the hospitalized COVID-19 patients were admitted to the ICU and 16.9% received IMV; most patients (73.6%) did not require ICU admission or IMV, and 12.4% required both. The median hospital LOS was 5 days, in-hospital mortality was 13.6%, median hospital charges were $43,986, and median hospital costs were $12,046. Hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality increased with ICU and/or IMV usage and age; hospital charges and costs increased with ICU and/or IMV usage. Patients with both ICU and IMV usage had the longest median hospital LOS (15 days), highest in-hospital mortality (53.8%), and highest hospital charges ($198,394) and hospital costs ($54,402). LIMITATIONS: This retrospective administrative database analysis relied on coding accuracy and a subset of admissions with validated/reconciled hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study summarizes the severe health outcomes and substantial hospital costs of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US. The findings support the urgent need for rapid implementation of effective interventions, including safe and efficacious vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Cost of Illness , Disease Progression , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Intensive Care Units/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/economics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...