Initial non-adherence to lipid-lowering medication: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: The impact on cardiovascular health is lost when a patient does not obtain a newly prescribed lipid-lowering medication, a situation termed "initial medication nonadherence" (IMN). This research summarizes the published evidence on the prevalence, associated factors, consequences, and solutions for IMN to prescribed lipid-lowering medication in the United States. METHODS: A systematic literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar, along with screening citations of systematic reviews, identified articles published from 2010 to 2021. Studies reporting results of IMN to lipid-lowering medications were included. Studies that evaluated non-adult or non-US populations, used weaker study designs (e.g., case series), or were not written in English were excluded. RESULTS: There were 19 articles/18 studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Estimates of the prevalence of IMN to newly prescribed lipid-lowering medications ranged from 10 to 18.2% of patients and 1.4-43.8% of prescriptions (n = 9 studies). Three studies reported prescriber and patient characteristics associated with IMN. Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score and no ED visits or hospitalization were associated with IMN. Lipid lowering prescriptions from primary care providers were also associated with IMN. Four studies described patient-reported reasons for IMN, including preference for lifestyle modifications, lack of perceived need, and side effect concerns. Four intervention studies reported mixed results with automated calls, live calls, or letters. One study reported worse clinical outcomes in patients with IMN: higher levels of low-density lipoprotein and greater risk of emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: Up to one-fifth of patients fail to obtain a newly prescribed lipid-lowering medication but there is limited information about the clinical consequences. Future research should assess outcomes and determine cost-effective approaches to address IMN to lipid-lowering therapy.

What Guidelines Say About Risk Reduction: Major Data on the Link Between Lipid Lowering and Outcomes.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a significant health challenge, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing lipoproteins are increasingly recognized as central to its progression. Initially labelled as the "low-density lipoprotein hypothesis," our understanding of the etiology of ASCVD has evolved into the "ApoB principle," which highlights the causal and consistent role of all ApoB lipoproteins in ASCVD development. We review the large body of data from genetic studies, to epidemiologic studies, to clinical trials that support this foundational principle. We also provide an overview of the recommendations from guideline committees across the globe on dyslipidemia management and compare these with recent Canadian guidelines. With a few key differences, recent guidelines worldwide provide largely concordant recommendations for diagnosing and managing dyslipidemia with general consensus regarding the need for optimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ApoB-containing lipoproteins to prevent cardiovascular events and improve patient care.

Care Gaps and System Issues With Delivering Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Secondary Prevention.

This article examines the care gaps in lipid-lowering therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), primarily focusing on discrepancies between recommended practices and actual clinical implementation. It provides an overview of the different challenges in lipid management following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Studies reveal gaps in lipid testing and treatment adequacy post-PCI and ACS, as well as knowledge and practice gaps among primary care practitioners, particularly in adhering to the latest lipid guidelines. Initiatives such as the Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid-Lowering (GOAL) Canada program and the North American ACS Reflective III Pilot demonstrate improvements in the uptake of nonstatin therapies and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets through targeted educational and feedback interventions. Nonetheless, systemic challenges in the drug approval and reimbursement process persist and affect the accessibility of newer lipid-lowering agents. The most notable contribution of the reviewed studies is the demonstration of improved lipid management outcomes in high-risk ASCVD populations through targeted educational interventions, highlighting their potential value to change clinical practice.

Dyslipidemia and the Current State of Cardiovascular Disease: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Effect of Lipid Lowering.

Ischemic heart disease and stroke are the leading causes of death worldwide. Herein we review the burden, epidemiology, and risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The focus of this review is on the current state of ASCVD in Canada, however, the findings regarding epidemiological trends are likely to be reflective of global trends, particularly in high-income countries, and the discussion regarding risk factors and lipid lowering is universally applicable. In Canada, the burden of death from ASCVD is second only to cancer deaths. There are major differences in disease burden related to sex, geography, and socioeconomic status. The major risk factors for ASCVD have been identified, although new and emerging risk factors are an active area of research. Recent developments such as polygenic risk scores provide potential to identify individuals at risk for ASCVD earlier in life and institute preventative measures. Dyslipidemia, and in particular elevated concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B are a major cause of ASCVD. Therapies to lower low-density lipoprotein/apolipoprotein B levels are key components to treating and preventing ASCVD. Addressing the causal risk factors for ASCVD in a manner that comprehensively considers the clinical, social, and economic implications of prevention strategies will be essential to reduce the burden of ASCVD and improve outcomes for patients.

Medications for Lipid Control: Statins vs Newer Drugs.

In the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), statins are the primary pharmacologic intervention for ASCVD risk reduction. Statins have proven efficacy and safety in reducing cardiovascular events and total mortality in patients with and without clinically evident ASCVD. The purpose of this brief review is to provide a stepwise approach to lipid management, including lifestyle recommendations and medical therapy. We first review the main available approaches to lipid lowering and their mechanisms of action. We then summarise the findings of large randomised controlled trials investigating the benefit of statin therapy from 1994 to the present. The available statins are then reviewed, along with their main pharmacologic properties and potential adverse effects. Although statins are generally well tolerated, certain patients may require dose adjustments or alternative treatments because of side-effects. In patients not achieving adequate lipid control on a maximally tolerated statin, nonstatin medications, including ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, provide enhanced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cardiovascular benefits, especially in high-risk patients inadequately managed with statins alone. We review the role of triglyceride-lowering agents, including fibric acid derivatives and icosapent ethyl. We then deal with special populations, including those with hepatic steatosis, chronic kidney disease, pregnancy, and heart failure. This field continues to progress, and novel therapies are under active investigation, including an oral PCSK9 inhibitor and molecular therapies targeting lipoprotein(a), angiopoietin-like protein 3, and apolipoprotein CIII. We can look forward to exciting developments that will have major impacts on patient health and management.

Lipids, lipid-modified drug target genes, and the risk of male infertility: a Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Previous observational studies have reported a possible association between circulating lipids and lipid-lowering drugs and male infertility (MIF), as well as the mediating role of circulating vitamin D. Then, due to issues such as bias, reverse causality, and residual confounding, inferring causal relationships from these studies may be challenging. Therefore, this study aims to explore the effects of circulating lipids and lipid-lowering drugs on MIF through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and evaluate the mediating role of vitamin D. Method: Genetic variations related to lipid traits and the lipid-lowering effect of lipid modification targets are extracted from the Global Alliance for Lipid Genetics Genome-Wide Association Study. The summary statistics for MIF are from the FinnGen 9th edition. Using quantitative expression feature loci data from relevant organizations to obtain genetic variations related to gene expression level, further to explore the relationship between these target gene expression levels and MIF risk. Two-step MR analysis is used to explore the mediating role of vitamin D. Multiple sensitivity analysis methods (co-localization analysis, Egger intercept test, Cochrane's Q test, pleiotropy residuals and outliers (MR-PRESSO), and the leave-one-out method) are used to demonstrate the reliability of our results. Result: In our study, we observed that lipid modification of four lipid-lowering drug targets was associated with MIF risk, the LDLR activator (equivalent to a 1-SD decrease in LDL-C) (OR=1.94, 95% CI 1.14-3.28, FDR=0.040), LPL activator (equivalent to a 1-SD decrease in TG) (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.25-2.76, FDR=0.022), and CETP inhibitor (equivalent to a 1-SD increase in HDL-C) (OR=1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53, FDR=0.035) were associated with a higher risk of MIF. The HMGCR inhibitor (equivalent to a 1-SD decrease in LDL-C) was associated with a lower risk of MIF (OR=0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.83, FDR=0.39). Lipid-modifying effects of three targets were partially mediated by serum vitamin D levels. Mediation was 0.035 (LDLR activator), 0.012 (LPL activator), and 0.030 (CETP inhibitor), with mediation ratios of 5.34% (LDLR activator), 1.94% (LPL activator), and 12.2% (CETP inhibitor), respectively. In addition, there was no evidence that lipid properties and lipid modification effects of six other lipid-lowering drug targets were associated with MIF risk. Multiple sensitivity analysis methods revealed insignificant evidence of bias arising from pleiotropy or genetic confounding. Conclusion: This study did not support lipid traits (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, Apo-A1, and Apo-B) as pathogenic risk factors for MIF. It emphasized that LPL, LDLR, CETP, and HMGCR were promising drug targets for improving male fertility.

The potential of Myrmecodia pendans in preventing complications of diabetes mellitus as an antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic agent.

Background: Hyperglycemia in diabetes mellitus (DM) can lead to dyslipidemia, which is a risk factor for macrovascular complications such as heart disease and stroke. Aside from administering antidiabetic medications, DM treatment can also be achieved through the use of natural components, such as Myrmecodia pendans, commonly known as the ant nest plant (ANP). Aim: This study aimed to investigate the impact of administering the ANP on the lipid profile of Wistar rats. Methods: A group of 20 rats was divided into two categories: 6 rats served as healthy controls (H), while the remaining 14 rats were subjected to a high-lipid diet and streptozotocin to generate a model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The diabetic rats were divided into two groups: the DM group consisted of rats that did not receive any treatment, while the ANP group was administered the herb orally. Results: The results revealed significant variations in triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels among the three groups (p < 0.05). The post hoc test revealed disparities in triglyceride and LDL between those in the DM group and the ANP group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Myrmecodia pendans demonstrated the ability to decrease triglyceride and LDL, while increasing HDL levels in rats with T2DM.

Benefits of intensive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, few have focused on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the benefits of intensive lipid-lowering therapy with those of background statin therapy in patients with ACS. METHODS: Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for articles published until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that compared intensive lipid-lowering therapies and background statin therapies in patients with prior ACS and recorded the outcome of three-point major cardiovascular events (MACE) were included. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Nine trials involving 38,640 patients with ACS were identified. Pooled results suggested that intensive lipid-lowering therapies are associated with a reduction in the risk of three-point MACE (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; p < 0.001), recurrent ACS (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96; p = 0.013), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93; p < 0.001), stroke (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94; p = 0.003), and unstable angina-related hospitalization (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.99; p = 0.046), but not all-cause mortality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82-1.07; p = 0.329), cardiovascular disease-related mortality (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88-1.06; p = 0.457) or coronary revascularization (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00; p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapies may reduce the risk of three-point MACE, recurrent ACS, nonfatal MI, stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina in patients with ACS undergoing background statin therapy. These results may assist in clinical decision-making for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events to initiate intensive lipid-lowering therapies immediately after ACS.

Exploring the causal effect between lipid-modifying drugs and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a respiratory disorder of obscure etiology and limited treatment options, possibly linked to dysregulation in lipid metabolism. While several observational studies suggest that lipid-lowering agents may decrease the risk of IPF, the evidence is inconsistent. The present Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to determine the association between circulating lipid traits and IPF and to assess the potential influence of lipid-modifying medications for IPF. METHODS: Summary statistics of 5 lipid traits (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A, and apolipoprotein B) and IPF were sourced from the UK Biobank and FinnGen Project Round 10. The study's focus on lipid-regulatory genes encompassed PCSK9, NPC1L1, ABCG5, ABCG8, HMGCR, APOB, LDLR, CETP, ANGPTL3, APOC3, LPL, and PPARA. The primary effect estimates were determined using the inverse-variance-weighted method, with additional analyses employing the contamination mixture method, robust adjusted profile score, the weighted median, weighted mode methods, and MR-Egger. Summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) was used to confirm significant lipid-modifying drug targets, leveraging data on expressed quantitative trait loci in relevant tissues. Sensitivity analyses included assessments of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out methods. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of blood lipid traits on IPF risk (all P＞0.05). Drug-target MR analysis indicated that genetic mimicry for inhibitor of NPC1L1, PCSK9, ABCG5, ABCG8, and APOC3 were associated with increased IPF risks, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as follows: 2.74 (1.05-7.12, P = 0.039), 1.36 (1.02-1.82, P = 0.037), 1.66 (1.12-2.45, P = 0.011), 1.68 (1.14-2.48, P = 0.009), and 1.42 (1.20-1.67, P = 3.17×10-5), respectively. The SMR method identified a significant association between PCSK9 gene expression in whole blood and reduced IPF risk (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99, P = 0.043). Sensitivity analyses showed no evidence of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipid traits did not significantly affect the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Drug targets MR studies examining 12 lipid-modifying drugs indicated that PCSK9 inhibitors could dramatically increase IPF risk, a mechanism that may differ from their lipid-lowering actions and thus warrants further investigation.

Lipids, Apolipoproteins, Lipid-Lowering Drugs, and the Risk of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: Serum lipids are causally involved in the occurrence of atherosclerosis, but their roles in cerebral small vessel disease remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal roles of lipid or apolipoprotein traits in cerebral small vessel disease and to determine the effects of lipid-lowering interventions on this disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on genetic instruments of lipids/apolipoproteins, as well as characteristic cerebral small vessel disease manifestations, including small vessel stroke (SVS) and white matter hyperintensity (WMH), were obtained from publicly genome-wide association studies. Through 2-sample Mendelian randomization analyses, it was found that decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (odds ratio [OR], 0.85, P=0.007) and apolipoprotein A-I (OR, 0.83, P=0.005), as well as increased level of triglycerides (OR, 1.16, P=0.025) were associated with a higher risk of SVS. A low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.93, P=0.032) was associated with larger WMH volume. Specifically, the genetically determined expressions of lipid fractions in various size-defined lipoprotein particles were more closely related to the risk of SVS than WMH. Moreover, it was found that the hypertension trait ranked at the top in mediating the causal effect of hyperlipidemia on SVS and WMH by using Mendelian randomization-based mediation analysis. For drug-target Mendelian randomization, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-reducing genetic variation alleles at HMGCR and NL1CL1 genes and the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-raising genetic variation alleles at the CETP gene were predicted to decrease the risk of SVS. CONCLUSIONS: The present Mendelian randomization study indicates that genetically determined hyperlipidemia is closely associated with a higher risk of cerebral small vessel disease, especially SVS. Lipid-lowering drugs could be potentially considered for the therapies and preventions of SVS rather than WMH.

Genetic association of lipid and lipid-lowering drug target genes with atopic dermatitis: a drug target Mendelian randomization study.

Observational studies suggest dyslipidemia as an atopic dermatitis (AD) risk factor and posit that lipid-lowering drugs may influence AD risk, but the causal link remains elusive. Mendelian randomization was applied to elucidate the causal role of serum lipids in AD and assess the therapeutic potential of lipid-lowering drug targets. Genetic variants related to serum lipid traits and lipid-lowering drug targets were sourced from the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium GWAS data. Comprehensive AD data were collated from the UK Biobank, FinnGen, and Biobank Japan. Colocalization, Summary-data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR), and mediation analyses were utilized to validate the results and pinpoint potential mediators. Among assessed targets, only Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) was significantly linked to a reduced AD risk, corroborated across three separate AD cohorts. No association between serum lipid concentrations or other lipid-lowering drug targets and diminished AD risk was observed. Mediation analysis revealed that beta nerve growth factor (b-NGF) might mediate approximately 12.8% of PCSK9's influence on AD susceptibility. Our findings refute dyslipidemia's role in AD pathogenesis. Among explored lipid-lowering drug targets, PCSK9 stands out as a promising therapeutic agent for AD.

Treatment drop-in in a contemporary cohort used to derive cardiovascular risk prediction equations.

BACKGROUND: No routinely recommended cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction equations have adjusted for CVD preventive medications initiated during follow-up (treatment drop-in) in their derivation cohorts. This will lead to underestimation of risk when equations are applied in clinical practice if treatment drop-in is common. We aimed to quantify the treatment drop-in in a large contemporary national cohort to determine whether equations are likely to require adjustment. METHODS: Eight de-identified individual-level national health administrative datasets in Aotearoa New Zealand were linked to establish a cohort of almost all New Zealanders without CVD and aged 30-74 years in 2006. Individuals dispensing blood-pressure-lowering and/or lipid-lowering medications between 1 July 2006 and 31 December 2006 (baseline dispensing), and in each 6-month period during 12 years' follow-up to 31 December 2018 (follow-up dispensing), were identified. Person-years of treatment drop-in were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1 399 348 (80%) out of the 1 746 695 individuals in the cohort were not dispensed CVD medications at baseline. Blood-pressure-lowering and/or lipid-lowering treatment drop-in accounted for 14% of follow-up time in the group untreated at baseline and increased significantly with increasing predicted baseline 5-year CVD risk (12%, 31%, 34% and 37% in <5%, 5-9%, 10-14% and ≥15% risk groups, respectively) and with increasing age (8% in 30-44 year-olds to 30% in 60-74 year-olds). CONCLUSIONS: CVD preventive treatment drop-in accounted for approximately one-third of follow-up time among participants typically eligible for preventive treatment (≥5% 5-year predicted risk). Equations derived from cohorts with long-term follow-up that do not adjust for treatment drop-in effect will underestimate CVD risk in higher risk individuals and lead to undertreatment. Future CVD risk prediction studies need to address this potential flaw.

Adherence to cardio-protective medications and cardiovascular disease in adults with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: We estimated overall refill adherence to all antihypertensive [AHT] and/or lipid-lowering drugs in the treatment regimen and its association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with type 1 diabetes, taking kidney disease into account. METHODS: This Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study involved 1,558 adults with type 1 diabetes who had purchased AHT and/or lipid-lowering drugs within ± 0.5 year from baseline and were followed until their first CVD event, death, or end of 2015. Proportion of days covered (PDC) method was used to calculate adherence. The adherence was classified as good (≥80 %), intermediate (≥50 and <80%) or poor (<50%). RESULTS: Median adherence rate was 74% (IQR 63-84 %). Both good (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.33, 0.92], P=0.02) and intermediate (0.47 [0.29, 0.77], P=0.003) adherence were associated with lower odds of CVD, compared to poor adherence. Moreover, the higher the adherence percentage point in those with moderate albuminuria, the lower was the odds for CVD (0.81 [0.67, 0.98], P=0.03, per 10 unit increase in adherence). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with type 1 diabetes, refill adherence of 50% or more to cardio-protective medications is associated with lower odds of incident CVD. Our findings highlight the relevance of going beyond prescribing protective CVD drugs, ensuring, and improving medication adherence matters.

Lessons from PROMINENT and prospects for pemafibrate.

The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study.

Repurposing lipid-lowering drugs on asthma and lung function: evidence from a genetic association analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the correlation between asthma risk and genetic variants affecting the expression or function of lipid-lowering drug targets. METHODS: We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using variants in several genes associated with lipid-lowering medication targets: HMGCR (statin target), PCSK9 (alirocumab target), NPC1L1 (ezetimibe target), APOB (mipomersen target), ANGPTL3 (evinacumab target), PPARA (fenofibrate target), and APOC3 (volanesorsen target), as well as LDLR and LPL. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between lipid-lowering drugs and asthma through MR. Finally, we assessed the efficacy and stability of the MR analysis using the MR Egger and inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods. RESULTS: The elevated triglyceride (TG) levels associated with the APOC3, and LPL targets were found to increase asthma risk. Conversely, higher LDL-C levels driven by LDLR were found to decrease asthma risk. Additionally, LDL-C levels (driven by APOB, NPC1L1 and HMGCR targets) and TG levels (driven by the LPL target) were associated with improved lung function (FEV1/FVC). LDL-C levels driven by PCSK9 were associated with decreased lung function (FEV1/FVC). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our findings suggest a likely causal relationship between asthma and lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, there is compelling evidence indicating that lipid-lowering therapies could play a crucial role in the future management of asthma.

Association of lipid-lowering drugs with risk of sarcopenia: a drug target mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering drugs are widely used among the elderly, with some studies suggesting links to muscle-related symptoms. However, the causality remains uncertain. METHODS: Using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we assessed the causal effects of genetically proxied reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) through inhibitions of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) on sarcopenia-related traits, including low hand grip strength, appendicular lean mass, and usual walking pace. A meta-analysis was conducted to combine the causal estimates from different consortiums. RESULTS: Using LDL-C pooled data predominantly from UK Biobank, genetically proxied inhibition of HMGCR was associated with higher appendicular lean mass (beta = 0.087, P = 7.56 × 10- 5) and slower walking pace (OR = 0.918, P = 6.06 × 10- 9). In contrast, inhibition of PCSK9 may reduce appendicular lean mass (beta = -0.050, P = 1.40 × 10- 3), while inhibition of NPC1L1 showed no causal impact on sarcopenia-related traits. These results were validated using LDL-C data from Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, indicating that HMGCR inhibition may increase appendicular lean mass (beta = 0.066, P = 2.17 × 10- 3) and decelerate walking pace (OR = 0.932, P = 1.43 × 10- 6), whereas PCSK9 inhibition could decrease appendicular lean mass (beta = -0.048, P = 1.69 × 10- 6). Meta-analysis further supported the robustness of these causal associations. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically proxied HMGCR inhibition may increase muscle mass but compromise muscle function, PCSK9 inhibition could result in reduced muscle mass, while NPC1L1 inhibition is not associated with sarcopenia-related traits and this class of drugs may serve as viable alternatives to sarcopenia individuals or those at an elevated risk.

Fenofibrate's impact on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes: a nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of fenofibrate on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes in patients with diabetes and statin treatment are unclear. We investigated the effects of fenofibrate on all-cause mortality and ASCVD in patients with diabetes, high triglyceride (TG) levels and statin treatment. METHODS: We performed a nationwide propensity-score matched (1:1) cohort study using data from the National Health Information Database in the Republic of Korea from 2010 to 2017. The study included 110,723 individuals with diabetes, TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, and no prior diagnoses of ASCVD who used statins and fenofibrate, and an equal matched number of similar patients who used statins alone (control group). The study outcomes included newly diagnosed myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, both (MI and/or stroke), and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a mean 4.03-year follow-up period, the hazard ratios (HR) for outcomes in the fenofibrate group in comparison to the control group were 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.827-0.933] for MI, 0.901 (95% CI 0.848-0.957) for stroke, 0.897 (95% CI 0.858-0.937) for MI and/or stroke, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.685-0.749) for all-cause death. These beneficial effects of fenofibrate were consistent in the subgroup with TG 150-199 mg/dL but differed according to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study involving individuals with diabetes and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL, the risk of all-cause death and ASCVD was significantly lower with fenofibrate use in conjunction with statin treatment compared to statin treatment alone. However, this finding was significant only in individuals with relatively high LDL-C levels.