Progressive eye pathology in mucopolysaccharidosis type I mice and effects of enzyme replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by α-L-iduronidase deficiency, resulting in accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAG). Ophthalmological manifestations are common in MPS I patients and often lead to visual impairment. Accumulation of GAG in corneal or retinal tissues reduces vision causing corneal opacity and neurosensory complications. One available treatment for MPS I patients is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), but the results of such treatment on eye disease are still debatable. Therefore, we aimed to determine the progression of ocular manifestations as well as the effectiveness of intravenous ERT in MPS I. METHODS: Corneal and retinal analyses were perform in eyes from 2- to 8-month normal and MPS I mice. Some MPS I mice received ERT (1.2 mg/kg of laronidase) every 2 weeks from 6 to 8 months and histological findings were compared with controls. Additionally, cornea from two MPS I patients under ERT were evaluated. RESULTS: Mouse corneal tissues had GAG accumulation early in life. In the retina, we found a progressive loss of photoreceptor cells, starting at 6 months. ERT did not improve or stabilize the histological abnormalities. MPS I patients, despite being on ERT for over a decade, presented GAG accumulation in the cornea, corneal thickening, visual loss and needed corneal transplantation. CONCLUSION: We provide data on the time course of ocular alteration in MPS I mice. Our results also suggest that ERT is not effective in treating the progressive ocular manifestations in MPS I mice and fails to prevent corneal abnormalities in patients.

Case series of patients under biweekly treatment with laronidase: a report of a single center experience / Série de casos de pacientes em tratamento com laronidase quinzenal: relato da experiência de um centro

ABSTRACT Objective: To report the stabilization of urinary glycosaminoglicans (GAG) excretion and clinical improvements in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) under an alternative dose regimen of laronidase of 1.2 mg/kg every other week. Methods: We participated in a dose-optimization trial for laronidase in MPS-I patients using four alternative regimens: 0.58 mg/kg every week, 1.2 mg/kg every two weeks, 1.2 mg/kg every week and 1.8 mg/kg every other week (EOW). After the trial ended, the patients resumed the recommended dose and regimen of 0.58 mg/kg every week. Under this regimen, some patients presented difficulties in venous access and were unable to commute weekly to the treatment center. Therefore, we used an alternative regimen that consisted of 1.2 mg/kg EOW in eight patients. A retrospective study of medical records of MPS-I patients who underwent both enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) regimens, of 0.58 mg/kg every week and 1.2 mg/kg EOW, was done. Results: Patients remained clinically stable under the alternative regimen, did not present elevation of urinary GAG nor any adverse event. Conclusions: The switch of dose regimen to 1.2 mg/kg EOW of laronidase was safe, and did not cause any clinical worsening in patients who had been previously under standard dose ERT.

RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever a manutenção dos níveis de glicosaminoglicano (GAG) excretados na urina e da estabilização clínica em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose do tipo I (MPS I) com o uso da laronidase num regime de dose alternativo de 1,2 mg/kg a cada duas semanas. Método: Alguns pacientes do nosso serviço participaram de um estudo de otimização de dose da laronidase para o tratamento da MPS I no qual foram comparados quatro esquemas terapêuticos: 0,58 mg/kg/semana, 1,2 mg/kg a cada duas semanas, 1,2 mg/kg/semana e 1,8 mg/kg a cada duas semanas. Após o término do estudo, todos os pacientes passaram a receber a terapia de reposição enzimática (TRE) na dose padrão de bula, que é de 0,58 mg/kg/semana, e nesse regime alguns pais se queixaram da dificuldade em comparecer ao centro todas as semanas, além da dificuldade de se obter acesso para punção venosa. Com base nessas queixas, oito pacientes passaram a receber a TRE no regime alternativo de 1,2 mg/kg a cada duas semanas. Foi feito o estudo retrospectivo de dados de prontuário de pacientes com MPS I que fizeram TRE com laronidase nas doses 0,58 mg/kg/semana e 1,2 mg/kg a cada duas semanas. Resultados: Os pacientes mantiveram-se clinicamente estáveis, não apresentaram aumento dos níveis de GAG urinários nem eventos adversos durante o regime alternativo de dose. Conclusões: A mudança para o esquema de 1,2 mg/kg de laronidase a cada duas semanas foi segura e não acarretou piora clínica nos pacientes que já estavam em TRE na dose padrão.

CASE SERIES OF PATIENTS UNDER BIWEEKLY TREATMENT WITH LARONIDASE: A REPORT OF A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE.

OBJECTIVE: To report the stabilization of urinary glycosaminoglicans (GAG) excretion and clinical improvements in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) under an alternative dose regimen of laronidase of 1.2 mg/kg every other week. METHODS: We participated in a dose-optimization trial for laronidase in MPS-I patients using four alternative regimens: 0.58 mg/kg every week, 1.2 mg/kg every two weeks, 1.2 mg/kg every week and 1.8 mg/kg every other week (EOW). After the trial ended, the patients resumed the recommended dose and regimen of 0.58 mg/kg every week. Under this regimen, some patients presented difficulties in venous access and were unable to commute weekly to the treatment center. Therefore, we used an alternative regimen that consisted of 1.2 mg/kg EOW in eight patients. A retrospective study of medical records of MPS-I patients who underwent both enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) regimens, of 0.58 mg/kg every week and 1.2 mg/kg EOW, was done. RESULTS: Patients remained clinically stable under the alternative regimen, did not present elevation of urinary GAG nor any adverse event.Conclusions: The switch of dose regimen to 1.2 mg/kg EOW of laronidase was safe, and did not cause any clinical worsening in patients who had been previously under standard dose ERT.

Laronidasa para el tratamiento de pacientes con mucopolisacaridosis tipo 1 / Laronidase for the treatment of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type 1

INTRODUCCIÓN: a) Cuadro clínico: La mucopolisacaridosis tipo I (MPS I) es una enfermedad autosómica recesiva dentro del grupo de errores innatos del metabolismo con depósito lisosomal de diversos tipos de glucosaminoglucanos (GAG). Este cúmulo de GAG (dermatán sulfato y heparan sulfato) puede darse en cualquier órgano y es provocado por la deficiencia de la enzima -L-iduronidasa, conllevando a síntomas progresivos multisistémicos y potencialmente mortales. b) Tecnología sanitaria: Laronidasa (Aldurazyme®, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc) es una variante polimórfica de la enzima humana -L-iduronidasa que se produce mediante tecnología de ADN recombinante. Su objetivo es sustituir la -L-iduronidasa ausente en MPS I proporcionando una enzima exógena para la absorción en los lisosomas. De esta forma aumenta el catabolismo de GAG y disminuye su acumulación. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad, así como documentos relacionados a la decisión de cobertura de laronidasa para pacientes con mucopolisacaridosis tipo I. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas: MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, COCHRANE, así como en buscadores genéricos de Internet incluyendo Google Scholar y TRIPDATABASE. En primer lugar se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECAs) y revisiones sistemáticas (RS) que evalúen la eficacia y seguridad de la tecnología. Debido a la escasez de estudios, se incluyen también estudios observacionales. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por las principales instituciones internacionales de enfermedades raras; y agencias que realizan RS, evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC). RESULTADOS: Se seleccionaron dos RS, dos GPC, un consenso y cinco ETS. Una RS publicada en el año 2017, incluyó dos ECAs y siete estudios no aleatorizados que incluyeran más de cinco pacientes. El primer ECA seleccionado compara laronidasa en dosis de 100 U/kg (0,58 mg/kg) endovenosa y placebo en niños de con una edad promedio de 15,5 años (rango: 6 a 43 años) teniendo como desenlaces primarios a la capacidad vital forzada (CVF) y la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos (PC6m). Los autores reportan que después de 26 semanas, los pacientes que recibieron laronidasa mostraron mejoras estadísticamente significativas en la CVF, mas no en la distancia de PC6m. También redujo significativamente la hepatomegalia y los niveles de GAG urinarios y, en pacientes más gravemente afectados, mejoró la apnea/hipopnea del sueño y la flexión del hombro. En el segundo ECA se compararon distintas dosis de laronidasa, no encontrando diferencias significativas en la reducción de la excreción urinaria de GAG o el volumen hepático. En ambos estudios laronidasa tuvo un perfil de seguridad aceptable. Debido a la heterogeneidad de estos dos ECAs, no se pudo realizar un meta-análisis. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de laronidasa en MPS-I es escasa y de baja calidad metodológica; se basa en dos ECAs comparando laronidasa frente a placebo o distintas dosis de laronidasa entre sí. Si bien se ha intentado analizar los desenlaces clínicos combinando los resultados de los ECAs y estudios observacionales, la calidad de estos resultados es cuestionable y tiene que ser tomada con precaución. Los beneficios demostrados con la evidencia disponible son moderados, sin incluir un beneficio en desenlaces primordiales como mortalidad o calidad de vida. La mayoría de GPC y consensos consideran el uso de laronidasa después del trasplante de células hematopoyéticas. No existe consenso en las recomendaciones de las ETS seleccionadas, dos de ellas consideran justificable el reembolso de laronidasa después de la evaluación de la evidencia y análisis presupuestarios. Las cinco ETS coinciden en que la evidencia disponible es de baja calidad metodológica.

Neurocognitive and somatic stabilization in pediatric patients with severe Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I after 52 weeks of intravenous brain-penetrating insulin receptor antibody-iduronidase fusion protein (valanafusp alpha): an open label phase 1-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) Type I (MPSI) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme, α-L-iduronidase (IDUA), and a majority of patients present with severe neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. Recombinant IDUA does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To enable BBB transport, IDUA was re-engineered as an IgG-IDUA fusion protein, valanafusp alpha, where the IgG domain targets the BBB human insulin receptor to enable transport of the enzyme into the brain. We report the results of a 52-week clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of valanafusp alpha in pediatric MPSI patients with cognitive impairment. In the phase I trial, 6 adults with attenuated MPSI were administered 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg doses of valanafusp alpha by intravenous (IV) infusion. In the phase II trial, 11 pediatric subjects, 2-15 years of age, were treated for 52 weeks with weekly IV infusions of valanafusp alpha at 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg. Assessments of adverse events, cognitive stabilization, and somatic stabilization were made. Outcomes at 52 weeks were compared to baseline. RESULTS: Drug related adverse events included infusion related reactions, with an incidence of 1.7%, and transient hypoglycemia, with an incidence of 6.4%. The pediatric subjects had CNS involvement with a mean enrollment Development Quotient (DQ) of 36.1±7.1. The DQ, and the cortical grey matter volume of brain, were stabilized by valanafusp alpha treatment. Somatic manifestations were stabilized, or improved, based on urinary glycosaminoglycan levels, hepatic and spleen volumes, and shoulder range of motion. CONCLUSION: Clinical evidence of the cognitive and somatic stabilization indicates that valanafusp alpha is transported into both the CNS and into peripheral organs due to its dual targeting mechanism via the insulin receptor and the mannose 6-phosphate receptor. This novel fusion protein offers a pharmacologic approach to the stabilization of cognitive function in MPSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.Gov, NCT03053089 . Retrospectively registered 9 February, 2017; Clinical Trials.Gov, NCT03071341 . Registered 6 March, 2017.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous laronidase for mucopolysaccharidosis type I: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IV laronidase for MPS I. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases, limited to clinical trials published until December 31, 2016. The first inclusion criterion was being a randomized controlled trial (RCT). If < five RCTs were identified, open-label and nonrandomized trials, controlled or uncontrolled (quasi-experimental), including ≥ five patients, and evaluating relevant outcomes defined a priori, would also be included. For meta-analysis, primary inferences were based on random-effects models. Assessment of article quality was performed in accordance with the GRADE criteria. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to examine the risk of bias for RCTs. RESULTS: The selection phase retrieved 632 articles. During the first phase of selection, 158 had the abstract or full text read for assessment of eligibility, of which nine (two RCTs) were included for qualitative synthesis. Four papers were included in the meta-analysis, which was performed for the following outcomes: occurrence of treatment-emergent or infusion-related adverse events (65%; 95%CI 53, 76), mild in most cases; development of IgG antibodies to laronidase (88%; 95%CI 67, 100); apnea-hypopnea index (not significant-NS), urinary glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) [mean change -65.5 µg/mg creatinine (95%CI -68.8, -62.3)], liver size [mean change -31.03% (95%CI -36.1, -25.9)], left ventricular mass index (LVMI) [mean change -1.8 (95%CI -2.32, -0.25)], and distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (NS). Among the outcomes not included in meta-analysis, we found evidence for benefit of laronidase only on shoulder flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that IV laronidase effectively reduces urinary GAGs excretion, hepatomegaly and LVMI, and can improve shoulder flexion in MPS I patients. Laronidase appears to be safe in the studied population.

Laronidase como terapia de reposição enzimática na mucopolissacaridose tipo I / Laronidase as enzyme replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis type I

CONTEXTO: A mucopolissacaridose tipo I (MPS I) é uma doença lisossômica (DL) crônica, progressiva, causada pela atividade deficiente da alfa-L-iduronidase (IDUA). A IDUA é responsável pela clivagem dos resíduos de ácido idurônico dos glicosaminoglicanos (GAGs) heparan e dermatan sulfato. Na MPS I, ocorre o acúmulo desses GAGs parcialmente degradados no interior dos lisossomos e o aumento da sua excreção na urina. Em consequência, os pacientes apresentam comprometimento dos sistemas respiratório, nervoso, musculoesquelético, gastrointestinal (fígado e baço), cardiovascular, dentre outros. A MPS I é herdada de forma autossômica recessiva, sendo uma doença rara. A sua incidência mundial é bastante variável, sendo estimada entre 0,69 e 1,66 por 100.000 pessoas. Está associada a três formas clássicas, que diferem entre si com base na presença de comprometimento neurológico, na velocidade de progressão da doença e na gravidade do acometimento dos órgãos-alvo. Não existe tratamento curativo para a MPS I. O manejo clínico dos pacientes envolve equipe multidisciplinar e inclui intervenções realizadas no nível do fenótipo clínico (como cirurgias para correção de hérnias) e no nível da proteína mutante (transplante de células hematopoiéticas (TCTH) e terapia de reposição enzimática (TRE), conduzida com laronidase, enzima produzida por tecnologia de DNA recombinante). TECNOLOGIA: Laronidase. INDICAÇÃO: Reposição enzimática na mucopolissacaridose tipo I. PERGUNTA: O uso da laronidase como TRE em pacientes com MPS tipo I é eficaz e seguro na melhora clínica e da qualidade de vida dos pacientes? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: Foram realizadas buscas nas seguintes bases de dados: PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane e ClinicalTrials.gov. Treze estudos foram incluídos nesse relatório, sendo nove ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados, 4 revisões sistemáticas, os quais foram avaliados pelos desfechos, classificados, por sua vez, como de maior ou menor relevância clínica no tratamento da doença. Dentre os quatro desfechos considerados de maior relevância avaliados, o tratamento com laronidase trouxe benefício clinicamente significativo na capacidade de flexão do ombro que reflete um efeito positivo nas doenças osteoarticulares. Para os outros desfechos avaliados, qualidade de vida, manifestações cardiológicas e doença ocular não foi possível determinar com precisão a existência de benefício. Entre os desfechos de menor relevância, o uso de laronidase demonstrou ter impacto benéfico na diminuição da excreção de GAGs urinários e diminuição do crescimento hepático, mas com efeito incerto na capacidade respiratória, e no crescimento e estado nutricional. O uso de laronidase foi considerado seguro, não se relatando efeitos adversos importantes que pudessem comprometer o tratamento. Em estudos não controlados ou randomizados observaram-se maior probabilidade de sobrevida e menor impacto em órgãosalvo em participantes que fizeram o tratamento de reposição enzimática, principalmente quando se iniciava o tratamento de forma mais precoce. Recomendam-se que sejam implementadas políticas de saúde e educacionais no Brasil, que permitam o diagnóstico precoce dos pacientes, a fim de possibilitar a realização de TCTH, quando indicado, o início precoce da TRE e o aconselhamento genético. Da mesma forma, Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas deve estabelecer os critérios para início e interrupção do tratamento. ANÁLISE DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: A estimativa de impacto orçamentário decorrente da incorporação de laronidase estaria entre R$ 29 milhões a R$ 44 milhões no primeiro ano de incorporação. RECOMENDAÇÃO INICIAL: A CONITEC recomendou preliminarmente a incorporação no SUS da laronidase para reposição enzimática em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose tipo I. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Foram recebidas 348 contribuições, sendo 340 pelo formulário de experiência ou opinião e 8 pelo formulário técnico-científico. No que diz respeito às características das 340 contribuições pelo formulário de experiência ou opinião analisadas, 337 contribuições foram de pessoa física e 3 de pessoa jurídica. O percentual de concordância com a recomendação da CONITEC foi de 100%. Dos 08 formulários técnico-cientifico enviados e analisados, 7 foram de pessoa física (4 de profissionais de saúde, 2 interessados e 1 familiar) e 1 de pessoa jurídica. Todas as 8 contribuiçoes recebidas pelo formulário técnico-científico se declaravam favoráveis à recomendação da CONITEC e apenas 1 apresentou argumentos ciêntíficos. DELIBERAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros presentes na 57ª reunião do Plenário da CONITEC, nos dias 5 e 6 de julho, deliberaram por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação da laronidase para reposição enzimática em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose tipo I. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 275/2017.(AU)

Eficacia y seguridad de laronidasa en el tratamiento de pacientes con diagnóstico de mucopolisacaridosis / Efficacy and safety of laronidase in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mucopolysaccharidosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de tecnología de la eficacia y seguridad de laronidasa en el tratamiento de pacientes con diagnóstico de mucopolisacaridosis tipo 1 (MPS 1). La mucopolisacaridosis I (MPS 1) es una enfermedad rara que pertenece al grupo de desórdenes de depósito liposomal, siendo el síndrome Hurler el más grave, el de Scheie el más leve, y el de Hurler-Scheie el intermedio. La MPS 1 es una enfermedad heterogénea y multisistémica que se caracteriza por presentar alteraciones esqueléticas y articulares, retraso del desarrollo motor e intelectual, opacidad corneal, visceromegalia, enfermedad cardiaca, estatura baja, hernias, dismorfismo facial e hirsutismo. La esperanza de vida en los pacientes con el síndrome Hurler es generalmente hasta la adolescencia. El manejo de la MPS 1 se basa en brindar tratamiento de soporte y tratar las complicaciones específicas que puedan ir surgiendo en el transcurso natural de la enfermedad con un abordaje multidisciplinario; sin embargo, en la última década se han venido postulando nuevas alternativas de tratamiento como el trasplante de células madre hematopoyéticas y la terapia de reemplazo enzimático con laronidasa. Laronidasa (Aldurazyme®) es una variante polimórfica de la enzima humana α-L-iduronidasa que se produce mediante tecnología de ADN recombinante. METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de laronidasa en el tratamiento de pacientes con MPS 1 en las bases de datos de MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, CINAHL, COCHRANE y TRIP DATABASE. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por las principales agencias de tecnologías sanitarias que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC). RESULTADOS: Se realizó la búsqueda bibliográfica y de evidencia científica que sustente el uso de laronidasa en el tratamiento de la MPS 1 según la pregunta PICO establecida. Para el presente documento se seleccionó el siguiente cuerpo de evidencia que es resumido a continuación: Guías de Práctica Clínica (GPC): No se identificaron GPCs, no obstante, se incluyeron dos consensos de expertos, ambos elaborados por paneles auspiciados por el fabricante, que plantearon recomendaciones favorables a laronidasa en el manejo de pacientes con MPS 1. Adicionalmente, se incluyeron dos GPCs sugeridas por médico especialista. Evaluaciones de Tecnología Sanitaria (ETS): Se identificaron dos ETS que evaluaron laronidasa en el marco de una pregunta PICO similar a la pregunta de nuestro interés y fueron considerados como antecedentes importantes. Una ETS realizada por CADTH y un SMC advice. Revisiones sistemáticas (RS): Se encontraron dos revisiones sistemáticas actualizadas, una elaborada por la CADTH en el 2011 (CADTH, 2011) y la otra realizada por la colaboración Cochrane en el 2016 (Jameson, Jones, & Wraith, 2016), ambas identificando al ensayo ALID-003 como el único ensayo que responde de manera directa a la pregunta PICO de interés de este dictamen. Ensayos clínicos: Se encontró que el ensayo de fase III ALID-003 (James E Wraith et al., 2004) y su extensión no controlada ALID-006 (Clarke et al., 2009) representa el único ensayo clínico disponible a la fecha, la misma que consistentemente fue reconocida como tal por las dos GPC y ETS seleccionadas. CONCLUSIONES: A la fecha se ha publicado un único ensayo clínico de fase III (ALID-003) que reportó un efecto moderado en algunos desenlaces como la CVF, el volumen del hígado, y excreción urinaria de glicosaminoglicanos, aunque usando modelos estadísticos que no se condicen con su diseño de ensayo clínico. Por otro lado, no se encontraron efectos consistentes de laronidasa en relación a la prueba de caminata en los 6 minutos, calidad de vida, y otros desenlaces como el índice de apnea/hipopnea, y la amplitud de movimiento de flexión del hombro. Adicionalmente, se desconoce el efecto neto atribuible a este medicamento respecto a desenlaces finales que serían considerados de alta relevancia para los pacientes con MPS 1, tales como la sobrevida global, la tasa de crecimiento (peso y talla), el nivel de desarrollo, y variables cardiacas. Por lo tanto, no es claro que los efectos moderados de algunos de los desenlaces evaluados en este ensayo se traduzcan en un beneficio clínico perceptible por el paciente en la evolución de la enfermedad. En cuanto a la seguridad, si bien el ensayo clínico ALID-003 no reportó eventos adversos serios (EAS) en un periodo de 26 semanas, la extensión no controlada de este estudio (el ALID-006) con un periodo de seguimiento de 3.5 años reportó EAS en 3 de los 45 (7%) pacientes del estudio, incluyendo un desorden venoso y reacciones serias asociadas a la infusión (e.g., una reacción anafiláctica severa). Por otro lado, el uso de laronidasa como alternativa de tratamiento para MPS 1, también ha sido evaluada por otras dos agencias (Agencia Canadiense de Drogas y Tecnologías de la Salud y el Consorcio Médico de Escocia-SMC. La evidencia utilizada por ambas agencias también consideró los resultados del ensayo ALID-003, concluyendo que a la fecha no se podía plantear una recomendación favorable en relación al uso de laronidasa para MPS 1. Adicionalmente, se incluyen dos guías de práctica clínica sugeridas por la médica especialista autora del presente dictamen y dos consensos de expertos, los cuales publicaron recomendaciones específicas para el manejo de pacientes con MPS 1. Las GPCs y los consensos de expertos, a diferencia de las conclusiones de las ETS mencionadas previamente, concluyen que laronidasa es una alternativa de tratamiento recomendable. Es de notar que las producciones de las dos iniciativas de conceso de expertos fueron financiadas por el fabricante de laronidasa, con lo cual existiría un riesgo de sesgo importante en torno a dichas recomendaciones. Por otro lado, en relación a las recomendaciones realizada por las guías, es de notar que si bien recomienzan el uso de laronidasa las fuerzas de recomendación no son las más altas debido a que estas se basan de forma directa en la calidad de la evidencia, la cual no es gradada con el mayor nivel de calidad. Finalmente, laronidasa tiene un alto impacto presupuestario (el costo anual de la medicación para un paciente pediátrico de 20 kilogramos supera el medio millón de soles), lo que se traduce en un perfil de costo-oportunidad poco ventajoso para el sistema de salud, ya que la inversión de recursos en esta tecnología (sin un claro beneficio en desenlaces clínicos de alta relevancia desde la perspectiva del paciente) significaría que la institución deje de invertir en otras tecnologías costo-efectivas para la población. En consecuencia, y dada la incertidumbre con respecto al beneficio del uso de laronidasa en pacientes con MPS I, el presente dictamen concluye que no existen argumentos técnicos que respalden el uso de laronidasa con respecto a la mejor terapia de soporte. Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) no aprueba el uso de laronidasa para pacientes con MPS I.

Outcomes of Long-Term Treatment with Laronidase in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term outcomes of laronidase enzyme replacement therapy in patients with attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis type I. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of case notes, laboratory results, and data from clinical trials were used to evaluate urinary glycosaminoglycans, forced vital capacity (FVC), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), height-for-age Z score, cardiac valve function, corneal clouding, and visual acuity in 35 patients with attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis type I (Hurler-Scheie and Scheie syndromes) for up to 10 years following the initiation of laronidase therapy. RESULTS: Statistically significant (P < .001) reductions in mean urinary glycosaminoglycan levels relative to baseline were observed 6 months after treatment initiation and were sustained throughout follow-up. Disease remained stable after treatment initiation with no statistically significant changes in mean FVC, 6MWT, or height-for-age Z score. At last assessments, mitral and aortic valve function remained stable in 65% (22/34) of patients; corneal clouding remained stable in 78% (18/23); visual acuity remained stable in 33% (8/24) and improved in 42% (10/24) of patients. Younger patients (<10 years at treatment initiation) maintained disease measures closer to norms for age for FVC, 6MWT, and height and showed fewer deteriorations in mitral and aortic valve disease and corneal clouding compared with patients aged ≥10 years at treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Laronidase treatment resulted in disease stabilization in the majority of patients with a mean follow-up of 6.1 years. Data suggest that early treatment may result in better outcomes.

The impact of laronidase treatment in otolaryngological manifestations of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis / Impacto do tratamento com laronidase nas manifestações otorrinolaringológicas de pacientes com mucopolissacaridose

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency of a-l-iduronidase. The otolaryngological findings include hearing loss, otorrhea, recurrent otitis, hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoid, recurrent rhinosinusitis, speech disorders, snoring, oral breathing and nasal obstruction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of enzymatic replacement therapy with laronidase (Aldurazyme(r)) in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS I), regarding sleep and hearing disorders, and clinical manifestations in the upper respiratory tract (URT). METHODS: Nine patients with MPS I (8 Hurler-Scheie, and 1 Scheie phenotypes) of both sexes, ages ranging between 3 and 20 years, were included in this study. Patients were evaluated between seven and 11 months before the treatment and between 16 and 22 months after the onset of the enzymatic replacement. They were all submitted to a clinical and otolaryngological evaluation, including nasofibroscopical, polysomnographic and audiologic exams. RESULTS: The results' data showed decreasing of the frequency of ear, nose and throat infections, with improvement of the rhinorrhea and respiratory quality. No remarkable changes were observed regarding macroglossia and tonsil and adenoid hypertrophy. Audiometric and polysomnographic evaluations did not show statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Enzymatic replacement therapy in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I provides control of recurrent URT infections, rhinorrhea and respiratory quality, however it is does not seem to improve audiologic and polisomnographic parameters, with no effect on adenoid and tonsils hypertrophy and macroglossia.

Resumo Introdução: Mucopolissacaridose (MPS) é uma doença de depósito lisossômico causada pela deficiência de a-l-iduronidase. Os achados otorrinolaringológicos incluem perda auditiva, otorreia, otites de repetição, hipertrofia adenotonsilar, rinossinusite recorrente, distúrbios da fala, roncos, respiração bucal e obstrução nasal. Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto da terapia de reposição enzimática com laronidase (Aldurazyme(r)) em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose I (MPS I) em relação ao sono, distúrbios auditivos e manifestações clínicas do trato respiratório superior (TRS). Método: Nove pacientes com MPS I (oito com fenótipo Hurler-Scheie e um com fenótipo Scheie), de ambos os sexos, com idades variando entre 3 e 20 anos, foram incluídos neste estudo. Os pacientes foram avaliados entre 7 e 11 meses antes do tratamento e entre 16 e 22 meses após o início da substituição enzimática. Todos foram submetidos a uma avaliação clínica e otorrinolaringológica, incluindo nasofibroscopia, polissonografia e exames radiológicos. Resultados: Os dados dos resultados mostraram diminuição da frequência de infecções de orelha, nariz e garganta, com melhora da rinorreia e da qualidade respiratória. Mudanças significativas não foram observadas em relação à macroglossia e à hipertrofia adenotonsilar. Avaliações audiométricas e polissonográficas não apresentaram significância estatística. Conclusão: A terapia de reposição enzimática em pacientes com mucopolissacaridose I fornece controle de infecções recorrentes do TRS, rinorreia e qualidade respiratória, porém, não parece melhorar os parâmetros audiológicos e polissonográficos, ou exercer efeito sobre a hipertrofia adenotonsilar e macroglossia.

Alternative laronidase dose regimen for patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I: a multinational, retrospective, chart review case series.

BACKGROUND: Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with laronidase (recombinant human α-L-iduronidase, Aldurazyme®) is indicated for non-neurological signs and symptoms of mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I). The approved laronidase dose regimen is weekly infusions of 0.58mg/kg, however, patients and caregivers may have difficulty complying with the weekly regimen. We examined clinical outcomes, tolerability, compliance, and satisfaction in a series of patients who switched to every other week infusions. METHODS: This multinational, retrospective, chart review case series analyzed data from 20 patients who had undergone ERT with laronidase 0.58mg/kg weekly for more than one year, and who then switched to 1.2mg/kg every other week. RESULTS: The majority of patients had attenuated MPS I phenotypes (9 with Hurler-Scheie and 8 with Scheie syndromes) and 3 patients had severe MPS I (Hurler syndrome). Most patients presented with organomegaly (17/20), umbilical and/or inguinal hernia (16/20), cardiac abnormalities (17/20), musculoskeletal abnormalities (19/20), and neurological and/or developmental deficits (15/20). Following laronidase treatment, signs stabilized or improved. No deterioration or reversal of clinical outcome was noted in any patient who switched from the weekly dose of 0.58mg.kg to 1.2mg/kg every other week. There were no safety issues during the duration of every other week dosing. Patient compliance and satisfaction with the dosing regimen were greater with every other week dosing than weekly dosing. CONCLUSIONS: An alternative dose regimen of 1.2mg/kg laronidase every other week was well tolerated and clinically similar to the standard dose for patients who were stabilized with weekly 0.58 mg/kg for one year or more. When an individualized approach to laronidase therapy is necessary, every other week dosing may be an alternative for patients with difficulty receiving weekly infusions.

The impact of laronidase treatment in otolaryngological manifestations of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency of α-l-iduronidase. The otolaryngological findings include hearing loss, otorrhea, recurrent otitis, hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoid, recurrent rhinosinusitis, speech disorders, snoring, oral breathing and nasal obstruction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of enzymatic replacement therapy with laronidase (Aldurazyme(®)) in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS I), regarding sleep and hearing disorders, and clinical manifestations in the upper respiratory tract (URT). METHODS: Nine patients with MPS I (8 Hurler-Scheie, and 1 Scheie phenotypes) of both sexes, ages ranging between 3 and 20 years, were included in this study. Patients were evaluated between seven and 11 months before the treatment and between 16 and 22 months after the onset of the enzymatic replacement. They were all submitted to a clinical and otolaryngological evaluation, including nasofibroscopical, polysomnographic and audiologic exams. RESULTS: The results' data showed decreasing of the frequency of ear, nose and throat infections, with improvement of the rhinorrhea and respiratory quality. No remarkable changes were observed regarding macroglossia and tonsil and adenoid hypertrophy. Audiometric and polysomnographic evaluations did not show statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Enzymatic replacement therapy in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I provides control of recurrent URT infections, rhinorrhea and respiratory quality, however it is does not seem to improve audiologic and polisomnographic parameters, with no effect on adenoid and tonsils hypertrophy and macroglossia.

Mesenchymal stem cells do not prevent antibody responses against human α-L-iduronidase when used to treat mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPSI) is an autosomal recessive disease that leads to systemic lysosomal storage, which is caused by the absence of α-L-iduronidase (IDUA). Enzyme replacement therapy is recognized as the best therapeutic option for MPSI; however, high titers of anti-IDUA antibody have frequently been observed. Due to the immunosuppressant properties of MSC, we hypothesized that MSC modified with the IDUA gene would be able to produce IDUA for a long period of time. Sleeping Beauty transposon vectors were used to modify MSC because these are basically less-immunogenic plasmids. For cell transplantation, 4×10(6) MSC-KO-IDUA cells (MSC from KO mice modified with IDUA) were injected into the peritoneum of KO-mice three times over intervals of more than one month. The total IDUA activities from MSC-KO-IDUA before cell transplantation were 9.6, 120 and 179 U for the first, second and third injections, respectively. Only after the second cell transplantation, more than one unit of IDUA activity was detected in the blood of 3 mice for 2 days. After the third cell transplantation, a high titer of anti-IDUA antibody was detected in all of the treated mice. Anti-IDUA antibody response was also detected in C57Bl/6 mice treated with MSC-WT-IDUA. The antibody titers were high and comparable to mice that were immunized by electroporation. MSC-transplanted mice had high levels of TNF-alpha and infiltrates in the renal glomeruli. The spreading of the transplanted MSC into the peritoneum of other organs was confirmed after injection of 111In-labeled MSC. In conclusion, the antibody response against IDUA could not be avoided by MSC. On the contrary, these cells worked as an adjuvant that favored IDUA immunization. Therefore, the humoral immunosuppressant property of MSC is questionable and indicates the danger of using MSC as a source for the production of exogenous proteins to treat monogenic diseases.

A terapia de reposição enzimática pode mudar a frequência de intervenções médicas na mucopolissacaridose tipo I? Um estudo retrospectivo e exploratório / Can enzyme replacement therapy change the frequency of medical interventions in mucopolysaccharidosis type I? An exploratory retrospective study

Introdução: A mucopolissacaridose tipo I (MPS I) é uma doença lisossômica (DL) para a qual está disponível a terapia de reposição enzimática (TRE) com laronidase. Objetivo: caracterizar o efeito da TRE em pacientes com MPS I avaliados por um único centro de referências para DL a partir da análise da frequência de intervenções médicas. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo e exploratório com comparações pré e pós-intervenção. O número/ano/paciente de consultas, medicamentos usados, internações, cirurgias e exames realizados, foi obtido por meio de revisão de prontuário médico. Essas variáveis foram, então, comparadas entre dois períodos: pré-TRE e pós-TRE. Resultados: Nove pacientes (graves=3, atenuados=6) foram incluídos no estudo. A mediana de idade de início da TRE foi 9 anos e a mediana de duração da TRE foi 4 anos. Em média, os pacientes realizaram 90% das infusões previstas para o período. Somente o número de cirurgias/ano/paciente foi dependente do tempo de doença (p=0,0004) e da gravidade do fenótipo (p=0,014). Com relação às comparações pré e pós-TRE, as variáveis que apresentaram diferença significativa (média do número/ano/paciente) foram: exames (pré-TRE=10,2±2,7; pós-TRE=22,5±2,1; p=0,005) e internações (pré-TRE=0,05±0,04; pós-TRE=0,30±0,11; p=0,013). Conclusão: Nossos dados sugerem que a TRE não alterou a história natural da MPS I em relação aos desfechos analisados. Este achado pode ser devido à idade relativamente avançada de início do tratamento no nosso centro.

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPSI) is a lysosomal disorder (LSD) which can be treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with laronidase. Aim: To describe the effect of ERT on MPSI patients evaluated at a single referral center for LSD by assessing the frequency of medical interventions. Methods: An exploratory, retrospective study with pre- and post-intervention assessments. We reviewed medical records to collect data on the number of medical appointments/year/patient, medications used, hospital admissions, surgeries, and exams performed. These variables were then compared between the pre- and the post-ERT periods.Results: Nine patients (severe=3; attenuated=6) were included in the study.The median age for the start of ERT was 9 years, and the median time on ERT was 4 years. On average, patients received 90% of the infusions predicted for the study period. Only the number of surgeries/year/patient was found to be dependent on length of disease (p=0.0004) and on severity of phenotype (p=0.014). Regarding pre- and post-ERT comparisons, there was a significant difference (mean number/year/patient in exams (pre-ERT, 10.2±2.7; post-ERT, 22.5±2.1; p=0.005) and hospital admissions (pre-ERT, 0.05±0.04; post-ERT, 0.30±0.11; p=0.013). Conclusion: Our data suggest ERT didn’t alter the natural history of MPSI the outcomes assessed in this study. This may be due to the relatively advanced age of patients when they started treatment at our Center.

Treatment of MPS I mice with microencapsulated cells overexpressing IDUA: effect of the prednisolone administration.

Cell encapsulation, although a promising strategy to deliver therapeutic products, is hampered by immune response against biomaterials. The aim of this article is to assess the effect of prednisolone on enzyme release by microencapsulated cells implanted in vivo. Recombinant cells encapsulated were implanted in the peritoneum of wild-type mice and mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) I mice, with or without prednisolone. Later, microcapsules were recovered for histological and enzyme analysis. Blood was collected from MPS I mice. All animals receiving prednisolone had a smaller inflammatory infiltrate. In vitro, prednisolone increased the amount of enzyme released from the recovered capsules, but this was not accompanied by an increase in the amount of circulating enzyme in vivo after 15 days. However, in 7 days, prednisolone significantly increased the amount of enzyme detected in the serum. Although prednisolone improved enzyme release in vitro and in vivo after 7 days, it was unable to maintain this effect for a longer period.

[Mucopolysaccharidosis I: management and follow up of three patients]. / Mucopolisacaridosis I. Manejo y vigilancia de tres casos.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I or mucopolisacaridosis type I is a rare genetic disease, with a severe and fast multiorganic damage profile and fatal prognosis in the early years of age. It belongs to the lysosomal storage diseases (LSD) group pathologies. As an LSD, mucopolisacaridosis type I is due to the lack of the α-L-iduronidase enzyme. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with laronidase is an effective treatment choice. It is available in Mexico since 2005. In the Hospital UMAE 25 of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, three patients have been treated and followed since 2006, with a close surveillance on their clinical evolution. The ERT with laronidase is expensive, relatively new and with little experience in Mexico, so there is a real need of knowing clinical evolution as well as overall treatment efficacy from baseline pre-treatment stage to date. Data on physical, functional and biochemical changes in these patients is presented.

Intraperitoneal implant of recombinant encapsulated cells overexpressing alpha-L-iduronidase partially corrects visceral pathology in mucopolysaccharidosis type I mice.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is characterized by deficiency of the enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase (IDUA) and storage of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) in several tissues. Current available treatments present limitations, thus the search for new therapies. Encapsulation of recombinant cells within polymeric structures combines gene and cell therapy and is a promising approach for treating MPS I. METHODS: We produced alginate microcapsules containing baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells overexpressing IDUA and implanted these capsules in the peritoneum of MPS I mice. RESULTS: An increase in serum and tissue IDUA activity was observed at early time-points, as well as a reduction in GAG storage; however, correction in the long term was only partially achieved, with a drop in the IDUA activity being observed a few weeks after the implant. Analysis of the capsules obtained from the peritoneum revealed inflammation and a pericapsular fibrotic process, which could be responsible for the reduction in IDUA levels observed in the long term. In addition, treated mice developed antibodies against the enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the encapsulation process is effective in the short term but improvements must be achieved in order to reduce the immune response and reach a stable correction.

Clinical manifestations and treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type I patients in Latin America as compared with the rest of the world.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I) comprises a spectrum of clinical manifestations and is divided into three phenotypes reflecting clinical severity: Hurler, Hurler-Scheie, and Scheie syndromes. There may be important variations in clinical manifestations of this genetic disease in patients residing in different regions of the world. METHODS: Using data from the MPS I Registry (as of September 2009), we evaluated patients from Latin America (n = 118) compared with patients from the rest of the world [ROW (n = 727)]. RESULTS: Phenotype distribution differed among patients in Latin America compared to ROW (Hurler 31 vs. 62%, Hurler-Scheie 36 vs. 21%, Scheie 10 vs. 11%, and unknown 22 vs. 6%). The frequency of certain symptoms, such as cardiac valve abnormalities, sleep impairment, and joint contractures, also differed between Latin America and ROW for some phenotypes. Median age at MPS I diagnosis was earlier in the ROW than Latin America for all phenotypes, and age at first treatment for Hurler and Hurler-Scheie patients was also earlier in the ROW. Hurler patients in Latin America showed a gap of 3.1 years between median ages of diagnosis and first treatment compared to only 0.5 years in the ROW. Treatment allocation in Latin America compared to ROW was as follows: enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) only, 80 vs. 45%; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) only, 0.9 vs. 27%; both ERT and HSCT, 0 vs. 16%; and neither treatment, 19 vs. 13%. CONCLUSION: These data highlight important differences in MPS I patients between Latin America and ROW in terms of phenotypic distribution, clinical manifestations, and treatment practices.

Ethical issues related to the access to orphan drugs in Brazil: the case of mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder treated with bone marrow transplantation or enzyme replacement therapy with laronidase, a high-cost orphan drug. Laronidase was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency in 2003 and by the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency in 2005. Many Brazilian MPS I patients have been receiving laronidase despite the absence of a governmental policy regulating access to the drug. Epidemiological and treatment data concerning MPS I are scarce. This study aims to present a demographic profile of Brazilian patients with MPS I, describe the routes of access to laronidase in Brazil, and discuss associated ethical issues relating to public funding of orphan drugs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, data were collected nationwide between January and September 2008 from physicians, public institutions and non-governmental organisations involved with diagnosis and treatment of MPS I, using two data collection instruments specifically designed for this purpose. RESULTS: The minimum prevalence of MPS I in Brazil was estimated at 1/2,700,000. Most patients (69.8%) were younger than 15 years; 60 (88.2%) received laronidase. The most common route of access to the drug was through lawsuits (86.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, MPS I is predominantly a paediatric illness. Even though the cost of laronidase treatment is not officially covered by the Brazilian government, most MPS I patients receive the drug, usually through litigation. This gives rise to major ethical conflicts concerning drug access in a low-resource context. The Brazilian health policy framework lacks evidence-based clinical protocols for the distribution of orphan drugs.

Intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy in a patient with mucopolysaccharidosis type I and symptomatic spinal cord compression.

In mucopolysaccharidosis I, deficiency of alpha-L-iduronidase can cause spinal cord compression (SCC) due to storage of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) within the cervical meninges. As intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is not likely to provide enzyme across the blood-brain barrier, standard treatment for this complication is usually surgical, which has a high morbidity and mortality risk. We report on the use of intrathecal (IT) laronidase in a MPS I patient with SCC who refused the surgical treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline, with clinical and biochemical evaluations, 4-extremity somatosensory evoked potentials, 12 min walk test and MRI studies of the CNS. Changes on these parameters were evaluated after 4 IT infusions of laronidase administered monthly via lumbar puncture. To our knowledge, this was the first MPS patient who received IT ERT. No major adverse events were observed. There were no clinically significant changes in serum chemistries. CSF GAG results revealed pretreatment values slightly above normal standards: 13.3 mg/L (NV < 12 mg/L) which after IT laronidase infusions were within normal levels (10.3 mg/L). 12MWT presented a 14% improvement, with better performance on stability and gait control. Maximum voluntary ventilation showed 55.6% improvement considering the percentage of predicted (26.7% at baseline compared to 41.9%); Maximum Inspiration Pressure improved 36.6% of predicted (26.8% at baseline to 36.7%); Pulmonary diffusion improved 17.6% of predicted %. In conclusion, although the improvement observed in this case with IT laronidase should be confirmed in further patients, this procedure seems to be a safe treatment for SCC in MPS I.