Long-term use of rituximab increases T cell count in MS patients.

Rituximab has been used to treat MS patients in Iceland for over a decade. However, long-term effect of rituximab on leukocyte populations has not yet been elucidated. By retrospective analysis of flow cytometric data from 349 patients visiting the neurological ward at The National University Hospital of Iceland from 2012 to 2023 for rituximab treatment, the long-term effect of rituximab and whether the effect was dose dependent (1000mg vs 500mg) was evaluated. No difference was detected in efficacy of B cell depletion in patients treated with 500mg as an initial dose of rituximab when compared to 1000mg. Long-term use of rituximab led to an increase in T cell count (p=0,0015) in patients receiving 3-8 doses of rituximab (1.5-8 years of treatment). The increase occurred in both CD4+ (p=0,0028) and CD8+ T cells (p=0,0015) and led to a decrease in the CD4/CD8 ratio (p=0,004). The most notable difference lies in reshaping the balance between näive and effector CD8+ T cells. The clinical implications of long-term treatment with rituximab and its effect on the T cell pool needs to be explored further. Since no difference in B cell depletion was detected between the two patient groups, 1000mg as an initial dose might be excessive, suggesting a personalized dosing regimen might have therapeutic and financial advantages.

High NEDA and No PIRA in Natalizumab-Treated Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by a more rapid accumulation of CNS inflammation than adult-onset MS (AOMS), the therapeutic algorithms applied in POMS are usually based on AOMS therapeutic outcomes. To define a high-efficacy treatment (HET)-based strategy to treat POMS, we designed an observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS and AOMS. METHODS: Starting from 160 patients, we applied a 2:1 (adult:pediatric) matching on propensity scores and obtained 32 patients with NTZ-treated POMS and 64 with AOMS, estimated from a multivariable logistic regression model. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up every 6 months for a mean period of 46.0 ± 26.9 months. RESULTS: Following re-baseline at month 6, no difference (log-rank test: p = 0.924) in new and enlarging T2 white matter lesions, postcontrast T1 lesions, and relapse rate were observed between POMS and AOMS throughout the study. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) was never observed in POMS, while 9 of 64 patients with AOMS (12.5%) had PIRA events during the follow-up (40.0 ± 25.9 months; log-rank p value 0.0156). JCV seroconversion rate during NTZ infusion did not differ between POMS and AOMS (log-rank test p = 0.3231). Finally, no serious adverse event was observed in both POMS and AOMS. DISCUSSION: The favorable outcomes observed on clinical, especially in PIRA, and radiologic parameters strongly support the use of NTZ as a first-choice HET in POMS.

Switching from injectable to other Disease Modifying Therapies may improve sexual dysfunction in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) a central nervous system autoimmune disorder, mainly affecting young adults and more prevalent among women, can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) among both males and females with MS. Female sexual dysfunction can be defined as dyspareunia, a lack of sexual desire, disorders in the arousal and orgasm phases, and sexual pain disorders. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in sexual function among females with MS whose treatment was switched from first-line injectable medications to other agents after a six-month duration. And assess the changes in all three domains of SD. METHODS: In this longitudinal study females diagnosed with MS, aged between 18 and 50 years old, and were candidates for switching their treatment from interferon beta-1a (intra-muscular and subcutaneous), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA), to Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), or Natalizumab (NTZ) due to patients' convenience and tolerability and adverse events were included. "Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19" was used to evaluate the SD changes before and six months after the new treatment initiation. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS V.24 software. Histograms and the Shapiro-Wilk test were used to assess the normality of the variables; due to the non-normal distribution of quantitative variables (except for age), the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the scores, before and six months after the medication change. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05. RESULTS: Out of 107 female participants (average age: 35.09 ± 5.61), The mean of overall MSISQ-19 scores, before and six months after the medication change were not significant (p-value = 0.091). However, considering the subdomains, the medication changes only affected the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 (p-value = 0.017). Still, the scores of other subdomains did not change significantly (p-value = 0.761 for primary SD and 0.479 for secondary SD). Also, there wasn't any significant difference between EDSS before and after the medication change (p-value = 0.461). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this was the first study, assessing the effect of MS medication change on the improvement of SD among patients. According to the results of the presented cross-sectional study, we found that during a six-month period, the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 symptoms improved significantly, while the changes in other SD domains were not significant.

Study protocol for a randomised, phase II, double-blind, experimental medicine study of obinutuzumab versus rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis: ObiVas.

INTRODUCTION: Relapses in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) increase the incidence of end-organ damage and their prevention requires prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab, a type I anti-CD20 B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is the current standard of care for induction of disease remission. Rituximab is not always effective and is associated with a high subsequent relapse risk. Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 humanised monoclonal antibody with the potential to obtain greater tissue B cell depletion than rituximab and reduce relapse risk in AAV. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ObiVas is a randomised, phase II, double-blind controlled trial that will compare the mechanistic effects of rituximab and obinutuzumab in the induction treatment of patients with AAV positive for proteinase 3 ANCA (PR3-ANCA). 26 patients, either newly diagnosed or relapsing, will be recruited from a single centre and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1000 mg rituximab or obinutuzumab as induction therapy on days 1 and 15, alongside a tapering glucocorticoid regimen. The primary end point is CD19+ B cell depletion in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), assessed as change from baseline to week 26. Secondary outcomes will compare the safety and clinical efficacy of rituximab and obinutuzumab and their impact on immune biomarkers, including tissue and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and PR3-ANCA binding levels. Patients are followed through to week 78. The trial opened for recruitment in January 2023 and is forecasted to complete recruitment by the end of 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: For all patients, informed written consent will be obtained in keeping with Good Clinical Practice. Trial results will be disseminated to the relevant scientific, clinical and patient communities on trial closure. NALT data analysis will start before trial completion. Other analyses will be reported after trial completion. This trial was given ethical approval by Edgbaston (West Midlands) Research Ethics Committee (approval reference 22/WM/0174). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13069630.

Immunomodulation as a treatment for parkinson's disease in current trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immunomodulatory drugs and immunotherapies are being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of neuroinflammation, as the latter is an essential mechanism for the development and progression of Parkinson's disease. Objective: The objective of the study is to review recent evidence on the evaluation of immunomodulators in randomized controlled clinical trials measuring improvement of motor symptoms. Methods: A meta-analysis of Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS III) scores extracted from seven articles selected after an online search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clarivate's Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials published between 2000 and July 2023 was performed. The selected articles reported clinical trials evaluating the effects of specific immunomodulators or treatments with known effects on the immune system and inflammation. MDS-UPDRS III scores were reported in these studies, and the results of the placebo groups were compared with those of the treatment groups. Results: A total of 590 patients treated with immunomodulators and 622 patients treated with placebo were included. A test for heterogeneity yielded an I2 value > 50%. The mean standard difference for change in MDS-UPDR III score was -0.46 (CI [95%] = -0.90 - -0.02, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the change in mean MDS-UPDR III score between the treatment and placebo groups; however, two studies showed a trend toward separation from the mean. Conclusion: The immunomodulatory treatments included in this study showed no efficacy in improving motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients. Further clinical trials with larger patient populations are needed.

A comparison of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on disease progression in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: No direct comparisons of the effect of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) events are currently available. We aimed to compare the risk of achieving first 6 months confirmed PIRA and RAW events and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.0 and 6.0 in a cohort of naïve patients treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register. METHODS: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab, and ≥3 visits were extracted. Pairwise propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Risk of reaching the first PIRA, RAW, and EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 events were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show cumulative probabilities of reaching outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 770 subjects were included (natalizumab = 568; ocrelizumab = 212) and the propensity score-matching retrieved 195 pairs. No RAW events were found in natalizumab group and only 1 was reported in ocrelizumab group. A first PIRA event was reached by 23 natalizumab and 25 ocrelizumab exposed patients; 7 natalizumab- and 10 ocrelizumab-treated patients obtained an irreversible EDSS 4.0, while 13 natalizumab- and 15 ocrelizumab-treated patients reached an irreversible EDSS 6.0. No differences between the two groups were found in the risk (HR, 95%CI) of reaching a first PIRA (1.04, 0.59-1.84; p = 0.88) event, an irreversible EDSS 4.0 (1.23, 0.57-2.66; p = 0.60) and 6.0 (0.93, 0.32-2.68; p = 0.89). INTERPRETATION: Both medications strongly suppress RAW events and, in the short term, the risk of achieving PIRA events, EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 milestones is not significantly different.

Dose-exposure-efficacy response of intravenous immunoglobulin G 10% in multifocal motor neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare chronic immune-mediated neuropathy with impaired grip strength representing a common symptom. While intravenous immunoglobulin G is an effective treatment for the disease, significant variation in treatment response has been observed but not well understood. This analysis characterized dose-exposure-response relationships in multifocal motor neuropathy, using grip strength as a clinical efficacy measure. METHODS: Serum immunoglobulin G trough concentrations and grip strength data for the more affected hand from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of intravenous immunoglobulin 10% in 44 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (NCT00666263) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: The model adequately described the observed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and relationships between intravenous immunoglobulin 10% dose, serum immunoglobulin G trough levels, grip strength, and inter-patient variabilities in multifocal motor neuropathy. Model-based simulations for various dosing regimens (0.4-2.0 g/kg every 2-4 weeks) indicated that ≥1.6 g/kg/month would achieve clinically meaningful improvements in grip strength (≥4 kg) in ≥70% of patients. More frequent dosing at an equivalent monthly dose led to a more consistent response in grip strength. Furthermore, splitting the dose over multiple days for high doses (>1 g/kg) did not impact grip strength. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that the majority of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy would respond rapidly to intravenous immunoglobulin 10% with a range of dosing regimens. Shorter dosing intervals may avoid the diminishing response seen with longer dosing intervals. Dose-splitting provided similar outcomes while offering flexibility and convenience.

Insight into motor fatigue mechanisms in natalizumab treated multiple sclerosis patients with wearing off.

Motor fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is due to reduced motor cortex (M1) output and altered sensorimotor network (SMN) modulation. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying therapy, reduces neuroinflammation and improves fatigue. However, some patients treated with natalizumab experience fatigue recurrence ('wearing-off') before subsequent infusions. Wearing-off provides a valuable window into MS-related motor fatigue mechanisms in a controlled, clinically stable, setting. This study investigates whether wearing-off is associated with worsening motor fatigue and its neurophysiological mechanisms and assesses natalizumab's effect on MS-related fatigue. Forty-five relapsing-remitting MS patients with wearing-off symptoms were evaluated pre- and post-natalizumab infusion. Assessments included evaluating disability levels, depressive symptoms, and the impact of fatigue symptoms on cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functioning. The motor fatigue index was computed through the number of blocks completed during a fatiguing task and peripheral, central, and supraspinal fatigue (M1 output) were evaluated by measuring the superimposed twitches evoked by peripheral nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation of M1. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography assessed M1 effective connectivity by measuring TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) within the SMN before- and after the task. We found that wearing-off was associated with increased motor fatigue index, increased central and supraspinal fatigue, and diminished task-related modulation of TEPs compared to post-natalizumab infusion. Wearing-off was also associated with worsened fatigue impact and depression symptom scores. We conclude that the wearing-off phenomenon is associated with worsening motor fatigue due to altered M1 output and modulation of the SMN. Motor fatigue in MS may reflect reversible, inflammation-related changes in the SMN that natalizumab can modulate. Our findings apply primarily to MS patients receiving natalizumab, emphasizing the need for further research on other treatments with wearing-off.

Hospitalisations and humoral COVID-19 vaccine response in vaccinated rituximab-treated multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with anti-CD20 therapies such as rituximab may have increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Vaccination induces protective immunity, but humoral vaccine response is known to be attenuated in rituximab-treated MS-patients-patients, which has indicated a need for real world data on severe morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 after vaccination. METHODS: Rituximab-treated patients treated at Haukeland University Hospital were identified through the National MS Registry and invited to participate in the study by giving a consent and providing a blood sample 3 weeks or later after ordinary COVID-19- vaccination, i.e. 2 doses given with a standard interval of 3 weeks. Blood samples were analysed with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to evaluate humoral vaccine response with screening test against receptor-binding domain (RBD) and confirmatory Spike IgG-specific ELISA. A haemagglutination test (HAT) was performed as a marker of neutralizing antibodies. Patient serum concentration of rituximab were quantified using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Registry data from the Norwegian MS registry and information on hospitalization from patient records were collected and linked to laboratory results. RESULTS: 111 patients were included in the study. A total of 7 (6.3%) were hospitalized due to COVID-19 disease during the observation period. No patient was admitted to ICU and there were no deaths. 34.2% did not have detectable titre of SARS CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies, 72.1% did not have a detectable titre of SARS CoV-2 RBD antibodies, and 88.2% did not have a detectable HAT titre. There was a correlation between hospitalisation and the absence of SARS CoV-2 Spike IgG antibody titre, and between hospitalisation and MS disease duration, as well as between spike IgG antibody titre and CD19 B-cell count, time since last rituximab infusion, cumulative rituximab treatment time and total IgG level in the patients. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of rituximab-treated MS-patients-patients did not have detectable humoral vaccine responses after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination. Despite this, the cumulative percentage of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 disease throughout the observation period of 22 months was low, and no patients required ICU treatment. The results support that vaccinated MS-patients treated with rituximab have a protective effect against serious Covid-19 infection.

Ocrelizumab in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A real-world multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is the only disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for the treatment of people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPPMS). OBJECTIVES: To provide real-world evidence of ocrelizumab effectiveness and safety in pwPPMS in Croatian MS centers. METHODS: A retrospective observational multi-center study of pwPPMS who were started on ocrelizumab in 7 MS centers in Croatia. RESULTS: We identified 230 pwPPMS of whom 176 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up of the cohort was 2.73 (0.51-5.77) years. During the follow-up, 50 (28.4%) pwPPMS experienced confirmed disability worsening (CDW) and 19 (10.8%) stopped treatment with ocrelizumab. Baseline EDSS >5 was a statistically significant positive predictor for the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause (OR 2.482, 95% C.I. 1.192-5.166, p = 0.015). However, there was no significant difference in the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause if stratifying the patients based on active PPMS, age at treatment start (≤55 years vs >55 years), disease duration at treatment start (≤10 years vs >10 years), or EDSS at treatment start (≤5.0 vs >5.0). During the follow-up, 26 (14.8%) pwPPMS experienced infusion reactions, 64 (36.4%) had an infection and 4 (2.3%) developed a tumor. The percentage of pwPPMS with low levels of IgG was persistently above 10% and with low levels of IgM was persistently above 20% after cycle 4. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data support the use of ocrelizumab in a much broader pwPPMS population than in the original randomized controlled trial.

Presentation and Outcome in S1P-RM and Natalizumab-Associated Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe neurologic disease resulting from JC virus reactivation in immunocompromised patients. Certain multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are associated with PML risk, such as natalizumab and, more rarely, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P-RMs). Although natalizumab-associated PML is well documented, information on S1P-RM-associated PML is limited. The aim of this study is to compare clinical presentations and outcomes between the 2 groups. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with PML from 2009 to 2022 treated with S1P-RMs or natalizumab. Data on clinical and radiologic presentation, outcomes, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), survival, disability (using the modified Ranking scale-mRS), and MS relapses post-PML were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, 84 were analyzed (20 S1P-RM, 64 natalizumab). S1P-RM-associated PML was diagnosed in older patients (median age 52 vs 44 years, p < 0.001) and after longer treatment duration (median 63.9 vs 40 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, S1P-RM patients were more prone to show symptoms at diagnosis (100 vs 80.6%, p = 0.035), had more disseminated lesions (80% vs 34.9%, p = 0.002), and had higher gadolinium enhancement (65% vs 39.1%, p = 0.042). Natalizumab patients had a higher IRIS development rate (OR: 8.3 [1.92-33.3]). Overall, the outcome (mRS) at 12 months was similar in the 2 groups (OR: 0.81 [0.32-2.0]). Yet, post-treatment MS activity was higher in S1P-RM cases (OR: 5.7 [1.4-22.2]). DISCUSSION: S1P-RM-associated PML shows reduced IRIS risk but higher post-treatment MS activity. Clinicians should tailor post-PML treatment based on pre-PML medication.

Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in pediatric-onset MS patients on fingolimod and ocrelizumab.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies looking at clinical a++nd MRI outcomes of treatments in pediatric MS, could assess current treatment algorithms, and provide insights for designing future clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To describe baseline characteristics and clinical and MRI outcomes in MS patients initiating ocrelizumab and fingolimod under 18 years of age. METHODS: MS patients seen at 12 centers of US Network of Pediatric MS were included in this study if they had clinical and MRI follow-up and started treatment with either ocrelizumab or fingolimod prior to the age of 18. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients initiating fingolimod and 52 initiating ocrelizumab met the inclusion criteria. Before starting fingolimod, mean annualized relapse rate was 0.43 (95 % CI: 0.29 - 0.65) and 78 % developed new T2 lesions while during treatment it was 0.12 (95 % CI: 0.08 - 1.9) and 47 % developed new T2 lesions. In the ocrelizumab group, the mean annualized relapse rate prior to initiation of treatment was 0.64 (95 % CI: 0.38-1.09) and a total of 83 % of patients developed new T2 lesions while during treatment it was 0.09 (95 % CI: 0.04-0.21) and none developed new T2 lesions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of evaluating current treatment methods and provides insights about the agents in the ongoing phase III trial comparing fingolimod and ocrelizumab.

Comparative study of efficacy and safety: Biosimilar rituximab versus originator rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus.

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 antigen in B cells. For pemphigus, rituximab has been highly effective in steroid-sparing therapy for moderate to severe cases. Originator rituximab has demonstrated favorable treatment effects in patients with pemphigus, but its high cost remains a challenge. Biosimilar rituximab is expected to offer a potential solution. However, it is required for the comparative study of efficacy and safety between biosimilar and originator because all biosimilars may not be identical to the originator. In this study, we compared the treatment effects and safety of biosimilar (Truxima) and originator (MabThera) rituximab in patients with pemphigus. A final cohort of 52 patients in the MabThera group and 72 patients in the Truxima group was enrolled. Except for the intravenous immunoglobulin administration rate, there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, and for the purpose of comparing efficacy, investigations into time to complete remission, total steroid intake to complete remission, and total steroid intake for 6 months following rituximab treatment revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Truxima can be considered a relatively affordable alternative treatment option for pemphigus, offering cost-effectiveness to patients who are indicated for the treatment with MabThera.

Age-corrected neurofilament light chain ratio decreases but does not predict relapse in highly active multiple sclerosis patients initiating natalizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a biomarker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, while most agree that NFL levels predict disease activity and worsening, the predictive value of NFL on future relapse risk remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to evaluate the predictive value of age-corrected serum NFL (sNFL) ratio on relapse risk in highly active relapsing-remitting MS patients (RRMS) treated with natalizumab. A secondary aim was to investigate the predictive value of sNFL ratios for MRI activity. METHODS: From January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010, 355 patients initiated natalizumab treatment at the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center. 305 patients were anti-natalizumab antibodies negative and had at least one blood sample available for sNFL analysis using single molecule array analysis at baseline, three, six, or 12 months. The patients were either treatment-naïve (n = 8), switching from interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate (n = 253), or switching from mitoxantrone (n = 44). An age-corrected ratio was calculated for sNFL. Time to first relapse was calculated from baseline and after re-baseline at 90 days. Data were collected from baseline until the two-year follow-up or end of treatment and included disease duration, expanded disability status scale, previous treatments, relapses 12 months prior to natalizumab initiation, smoking intensity, body mass index, and body weight. In addition, the patients underwent annual MRI of the brain. RESULTS: The sNFL ratio was increased in 173 of 287 samples (60.3 %) at baseline, in 119 of 246 samples (48.8 %) at month three, in 109 of 287 samples (38.0 %) at month six, and in 82 of 270 samples (30.4 %) at month 12. The sNFL ratio continuously declined over 12 months with significant decreases for every measuring timepoint: baseline vs. three months p = 3.0 × 10-6; three months vs. six months p = 3.2 × 10-5; six months vs. 12 months p = 0.002. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that time to first relapse from 1) natalizumab initiation and from 2) re-baseline was associated with the number of relapses in the previous 12 months (hazard ratio 1.31 per relapse, 95 % CI = 1.2-1.5, p = 2.0 × 10-6; and 1.21 per relapse, 95 % CI = 1.1-1.4, p = 0.002, respectively). sNFL ratio at re-baseline was negatively associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio 0.82 per unit; 95 % CI = 0.7-1.0; p = 0.049). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of relapse risk from re-baseline showed that the number of relapses in the 12 months prior to natalizumab treatment (hazard ratio 1.29; 95 % CI = 1.1-1.5; p = 6.0 × 10-4) and smoking (hazard ratio 1.51 per 20 cigarettes per day; 95 % CI = 1.0-2.2; p = 0.030) were associated with increased risk of relapse; sNFL ratio was associated with a lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio = 0.736 per unit; 95 % CI = 0.6-0.9 p = 0.007). In univariate logistic regression analyses, the sNFL ratio at 12 months and values above the 75th and the 90th percentile predicted MRI activity in the following year (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95 % CI = 1.2-3.6, p = 0.012; OR = 2.2, 95 % CI = 1.2-4.1, p = 0.014; and OR = 2.8, 95 % CI = 1.1-6.7, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: In this highly active RRMS cohort, high sNFL ratios reflected previous relapse activity and decreased after initiation of treatment but were not associated with increased relapse risk in the following two years. Pre-treatment relapses and smoking on treatment were predictors of relapse risk after re-baselining at 90 days. MRI activity in year two was predicted by sNFL ratios at month 12.

Neonatal B-Cell Levels and Infant Health in Newborns Potentially Exposed to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies During Pregnancy or Lactation.

OBJECTIVES: To report CD19+ B-cell counts and possible adverse effects on infants of mothers exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the German nationwide neuroimmunologic pregnancy registry. Inclusion criteria involved infants whose mothers received anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation, with ≥1 postnatal CD19+ B-cell count. Main outcomes were absolute and relative CD19+ B-cell counts. Comparison with reference values was performed conservatively in a subgroup with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy. Additional outcomes included pregnancy results, severe infections, and lymphocyte counts. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 49 infants (F:M 25:24) exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. CD19+ B-cell and lymphocyte counts in 40 infants with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy were comparable with normative values. Only 2 cases of complete CD19+ B-cell depletion occurred after second-trimester and third-trimester ocrelizumab exposure, with repopulation observed within 2 months. Exclusive lactation exposure had no significant effect on infants' absolute CD19+ B-cell counts. DISCUSSION: Administering anti-CD20 mAbs before or at the pregnancy onset, or during lactation, seems safe without significant impact on infant B-cell development. However, second-trimester or third-trimester exposure can cause CD19+ B-cell depletion due to placental transfer, necessitating monitoring and postponing live vaccines.

Immunomodulator adherence in multiple myeloma patients with lower socioeconomic status: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Poor adherence to oral chemotherapy adversely impacts clinical outcomes and escalates overall healthcare costs. Despite barriers to medication adherence, a significant gap remains in assessing adherence to oral chemotherapy among multiple myeloma (MM) patients with lower socioeconomic status. Hence, our study aims to evaluate immunomodulator adherence in MM patients at a county hospital, primarily serving underrepresented and indigent individuals with low socioeconomic status across the greater Houston area. METHODS: Inclusion criteria composed of patients diagnosed with MM, aged at least 18 years, and treated with lenalidomide or pomalidomide-two widely used immunomodulators-for a minimum of 2 months or having two or more records of dispensation between May 2019 and May 2021. Adherence was gauged using an adjusted version of the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled, yielding a mean MPR value of 88% (SD, ± 18.9). Of these, 43 patients (69.3%) demonstrated adherence with an MPR of ≥ 0.90. A significant difference was found in treatment duration between the adherent (mean 8.8 months; SD, ± 7.2) and non-adherent (mean 13.4 months; SD, ± 7.9) groups (p = 0.027). Notably, race/ethnicity demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.048), driven by disparities in African American and Hispanic representation across adherence levels. CONCLUSION: In summary, our findings highlight race and treatment duration to be predictors of immunomodulator adherence among MM patients with lower socioeconomic status. Further research is imperative to devise and test innovative interventions aimed at enhancing medication adherence, thereby contributing to improved survival and healthcare quality in this population.

Influence of personalized extended interval dosing on the natalizumab wearing-off effect - a sub-study of the NEXT-MS trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Wearing-off symptoms during natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis are characterized by an increase of MS-related symptoms prior to natalizumab administration. The influence of extended interval dosing (EID) on wearing-off symptoms are important to consider, as this might cause hesitancy in initiating or continuing EID. METHODS: Participants of the NEXT-MS trial, in which treatment intervals are adjusted based on drug concentrations, were divided into two groups: an extended group containing participants with at least one week of additional interval extension, and a group with a fixed interval during the trial (range 4-7 weeks). Changes in the occurrence, frequency, onset, and severity of wearing-off symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: 255 participants were included (extended group n = 171, fixed group n = 84). The odds on occurrence of wearing-off symptoms in the extended group did not increase after extending the treatment interval. Additional analyses for frequency, onset, and severity of wearing-off symptoms showed no changes over time. Mean decrease in natalizumab drug concentration did not influence the frequency of wearing-off symptoms. DISCUSSION: Wearing-off symptoms were not reinforced by further extending the natalizumab interval. Wearing-off symptoms might increase in a minority of patients after EID, although our data support the view that wearing-off symptoms appear to be unrelated to the decrease in natalizumab trough drug concentrations.

Predictive potential of serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for disease activity in treated multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to explore various biomarkers for predicting suboptimal responses to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with MS (pwMS). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, bicentric study with pwMS stratified based on their DMTs responses. Treatment failure (TF) was defined as the onset of a second relapse, presence of two or more T2 new lesions, or disability progression independent of relapse during the follow-up period. We evaluated intrathecal synthesis (ITS) of IgG and IgM using OCB, linear indices, and Reibergrams. Free kappa light chains ITS was assessed using the linear index (FKLCi). NfL and GFAP in serum and CSF, and CHI3L1 in CSF were quantified. Quantitative variables were dichotomized based on the third quartile. Predictive efficacy was assessed through bivariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for age, sex, EDSS, acute inflammatory activity (AI) -defined as the onset of a relapse or gadolinium-enhancing lesions within a 90-day window of lumbar puncture-, treatment modality, study center, and time from disease onset to treatment initiation. In case of collinearity, multiple models were generated or confounding variables were excluded if collinearity existed between them and the biomarker. The same methodology was used to investigate the predictive potential of various combinations of two biomarkers, based on whether any of them tested positive or exceeded the third quartile. RESULTS: A total of 137 pwMS were included. FKLCi showed no differences based on AI, no correlation with EDSS and was significantly higher in pwMS with TF (p = 0.008). FKLCi>130 was associated with TF in bivariate analysis (Log-Rank p = 0.004). Due to collinearity between age and EDSS, two different models were generated with each of them and the rest of the confounding variables, in which FKLCi>130 showed a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 2.69 (CI: 1.35-5.4) and 2.67 (CI: 1.32-5.4), respectively. The combination of either FKLC or sNfL exceeding the third quartile was also significant in bivariate (Log-Rank p = 0.04) and multivariate (HR=3.1 (CI: 1.5-6.5)) analyses. However, when analyzed independently, sNfL did not show significance, and FKLCi mirrored the pattern obtained in the previous model (HR: 3.04; CI: 1.51-6.1). Treatment with highefficacy DMTs emerged as a protective factor in all models. DISCUSSION: Our analysis and the fact that FKLCi is independent of EDSS and AI suggest that it might be a valuable parameter for discriminating aggressive phenotypes. We propose implementing high-efficacy drugs in pwMS with elevated FKLCi.

Benefits of early highly effective versus escalation treatment strategies in relapsing multiple sclerosis estimated using a treatment-sequence model.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about disproportionate impact on health care budgets limits implementation of early highly effective treatment (EHT) in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness of escalation versus EHT disease-modifying treatment (DMT) sequences. METHODS: Using a health-economic approach, we analysed health benefits (relapse rate reduction, disability prevention), direct/indirect DMT and societal costs of escalation versus EHT DMT sequences. In scenario analyses, we allowed (1) earlier use of alemtuzumab (ALE) and (2) a single retreatment with cladribine (CLA). RESULTS: In our model, we showed that the ratio between costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for the most cost-effective EHT and escalation sequence results into a similar net health benefit with higher costs and also higher QALYs associated with an EHT versus escalation strategy. Earlier use of ALE is more cost-effective than in later lines, even when aggravating the impact of its side-effects tenfold. Retreatment with CLA was more cost-effective in both escalation and EHT sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Certain EHT sequences are equally cost-effective to escalation sequences and are likely to result in more health at uncertain additional costs. The favourable cost-benefit ratio of CLA and ALE suggests that a wider application of affordable highly effective therapies could promote the cost-effectiveness both EHT and escalation approaches.