Anti-IL-5 Pathway Agents in Eosinophilic-Associated Disorders Across the Lifespan.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-5 pathways have revolutionized the treatment expectations for eosinophilic-associated conditions, particularly in patients with respiratory involvement. Mepolizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody), benralizumab (IL-5 receptor blocker monoclonal antibody), and reslizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody) have collectively contributed to the overall improvement of the disease burden in various conditions. Eosinophilic asthma currently boasts the most robust evidence across all age groups: all three biologics are approved for adults (aged ≥18 years); mepolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also in children (aged ≥ 6 years), while bernalizumab was recently approved by the FDA for patients aged ≥6 years in the USA. In chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, subcutaneous mepolizumab is the only anti-IL-5 therapy approved so far and can be used in adult patients (aged ≥18 years). For eosinophilic esophagitis, conflicting evidence surrounds both mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, leading to non-approval of these agents by the FDA/EMA. Recently, mepolizumab was approved for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients aged ≥6 years or older and for hypereosinophilic syndrome adult patients. A phase III trial proving noninferiority of benralizumab versus mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis has been recently published, while evidence on reslizumab is scant. Overall, current evidence on anti-IL-5 biologics for eosinophilic-associated disorders is mostly focused on adults, whereas data for individuals aged under 18 years and over 65 years are scarce, resulting in a lack of evidence, particularly regarding efficacy, for the use of anti-IL-5 agents in these specific patient populations. This review addresses high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world post-marketing studies regarding the use of anti-IL-5 therapies for eosinophilic-associated disorders across all age groups, spanning childhood, adulthood, and older age.

Patients taking benralizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab have lower postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 immunity.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies inhibiting the IL-4 or IL-5 pathways are very effective in the treatment of asthma and other related conditions. However, the cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 also play a role in the generation of adaptive immune responses. Although these biologics do not cause overt immunosuppression, their effect in primary severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunization has not been studied completely. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the antibody and cellular immunity after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients on biologics (PoBs). METHODS: Patients with severe asthma or atopic dermatitis who were taking benralizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab and had received the initial dose of the 2-dose adult SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine were enrolled in a prospective, observational study. As our control group, we used a cohort of immunologically healthy subjects (with no significant immunosuppression) who were not taking biologics (NBs). We used a multiplexed immunoassay to measure antibody levels, neutralization assays to assess antibody function, and flow cytometry to quantitate Spike-specific lymphocytes. RESULTS: We analyzed blood from 57 patients in the PoB group and 46 control subjects from the NB group. The patients in the PoB group had lower levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, pseudovirus neutralization, live virus neutralization, and frequencies of Spike-specific B and CD8 T cells at 6 months after vaccination. In subgroup analyses, patients with asthma who were taking biologics had significantly lower pseudovirus neutralization than did subjects with asthma who were not taking biologics. CONCLUSION: The patients in the PoB group had reduced SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers, neutralizing activity, and virus-specific B- and CD8 T-cell counts. These results have implications when considering development of a more individualized immunization strategy in patients who receive biologic medications blocking IL-4 or IL-5 pathways.

Titration of anti-IL-5 biologics in severe asthma: an open-label randomised controlled trial (the OPTIMAL study).

BACKGROUND: Anti-interleukin (IL)-5 biologics effectively reduce exacerbations and the need for maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) in severe eosinophilic asthma. However, it is unknown how long anti-IL-5 treatment should be continued. Data from clinical trials indicate a gradual but variable loss of control after treatment cessation. In this pilot study of titration, we evaluated a dose-titration algorithm in patients who had achieved clinical control on an anti-IL-5 biologic. METHODS: In this open-label randomised controlled trial conducted over 52 weeks, patients with clinical control (no exacerbations or mOCS) on anti-IL-5 treatment were randomised to continue with unchanged intervals or have dosing intervals adjusted according to a titration algorithm that gradually extended dosing intervals and reduced them again at signs of loss of disease control. The OPTIMAL algorithm was designed to down-titrate dosing until signs of loss of control, to enable assessment of the longest dosing interval possible. RESULTS: Among 73 patients enrolled, 37 patients were randomised to the OPTIMAL titration arm; 78% of patients tolerated down-titration of treatment. Compared to the control arm, the OPTIMAL arm tended to have more exacerbations during the study (32% versus 17%; p=0.13). There were no severe adverse events related to titration, and lung function and symptoms scores remained stable and comparable in both study arms throughout. CONCLUSION: This study serves as a proof of concept for titration of anti-IL-5 biologics in patients with severe asthma with clinical control on treatment, and the OPTIMAL algorithm provides a potential framework for individualising dosing intervals in the future.

Role of IL-5 in asthma and airway remodelling.

Asthma is a common and burdensome chronic inflammatory airway disease that affects both children and adults. One of the main concerns with asthma is the manifestation of irreversible tissue remodelling of the airways due to the chronic inflammatory environment that eventually disrupts the whole structure of the airways. Most people with troublesome asthma are treated with inhaled corticosteroids. However, the development of steroid resistance is a commonly encountered issue, necessitating other treatment options for these patients. Biological therapies are a promising therapeutic approach for people with steroid-resistant asthma. Interleukin 5 is recently gaining a lot of attention as a biological target relevant to the tissue remodelling process. Since IL-5-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab) are currently available for clinical use, this review aims to revisit the role of IL-5 in asthma pathogenesis at large and airway remodelling in particular, in addition to exploring its role as a target for biological treatments.

Towards precision medicine in COPD: Targeting type 2 cytokines and alarmins.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a main global epidemic increasing as population age and affecting approximately 10% of subjects over 45 years. COPD is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with several endo-phenotypes and clinical presentations. Although neutrophilic inflammation is canonically considered a hallmark of COPD, eosinophilic inflammation can also be present in a subgroup of patients. Several other immune cells and cytokines play a key role in orchestrating and perpetuating the inflammatory pathways in COPD, making them attractive targets for treating this disorder. Recent studies have started to evaluate the possible role of type 2 (T2) inflammation and epithelial-derived alarmins (TSLP and IL-33) in COPD. Two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) showed a modest reduction in exacerbations in COPD patients with eosinophilic phenotype treated with mepolizumab (anti-IL-5) or benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα). A phase III RCT showed a 30% reduction in exacerbations in COPD patients with ≥ 300 eosinophils/µL treated with dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα). These results suggest that blocking a single cytokine (e.g., IL-5) or its main target (i.e., IL-5Rα) is less promising than blocking a wider spectrum of cytokines (i.e., IL-4 and IL-13) in COPD. TSLP and IL-33 are upstream regulators of T2-high and T2-low immune responses in airway inflammation. Several ongoing RCTs are evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-TSLP (tezepelumab), anti-IL-33 (itepekimab, tozorakimab), and anti-ST2 (astegolimab) in patients with COPD, who experience exacerbations. In conclusion, targeting T2 inflammation or epithelial-derived alarmins might represent a step forward in precision medicine for the treatment of a subset of COPD.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SHR-1703, an innovative long-acting anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: SHR-1703 is a novel humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody with high IL-5 affinity and prolonged half-life, aiming to control eosinophil-related diseases. The study intended to evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of SHR-1703 in healthy subjects. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation phase I study was conducted. 42 subjects were allocated to sequentially receive single subcutaneous injection of 20, 75, 150, 300, and 400 mg SHR-1703 or placebo. RESULTS: After administration, SHR-1703 was slowly absorbed with median Tmax ranging from 8.5 to 24.5 days. Mean t1/2 in 150 to 400 mg doses was 86 to 100 days. Cmax and AUC increased in nearly dose-proportional pattern over range of 75 to 400 mg SHR-1703. After receiving SHR-1703, peripheral blood eosinophils (EOS) greatly decreased from baseline, which showed no significant change from baseline in placebo group. Magnitude and duration of reduction of EOS rose with increased dosing of SHR-1703. In 400 mg dose, remarkable efficacy of reducing EOS maintained up to approximately 6 months post single administration. Moreover, SHR-1703 exhibited low immunogenicity (2.9%), favorable safety, and tolerability in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of SHR-1703 support further clinical development of SHR-1703 in eosinophil-associated diseases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04480762).

Long-Term Effectiveness of Anti-IL-4R Therapy Following Suboptimal Response to Anti-IL-5/5R Therapy in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is an anti-IL-4R monoclonal antibody (mAb) with proven efficacy in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). A suboptimal response to anti-IL-5/5R mAbs is seen in some patients with ongoing evidence of type 2 (T2) inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To understand whether targeting IL-13 pathways with dupilumab in these patients may lead to better clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the extended clinical effectiveness of dupilumab up to 2 years of treatment in patients with SEA who had not responded adequately to anti-IL-5/5R biologics. The ability to achieve clinical remission and the change in the remission domains of exacerbation rate (AER), maintenance oral corticosteroid dose (mOCS), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), and asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire 6) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (mean age 41 years, 70% female) were included in the analysis. The mean (standard deviation) AER fell by almost 90% from 3.16 (1.28) at dupilumab initiation to 0.35 (0.72) after 1 year. The median (interquartile range) mOCS dose (n = 20) fell from 10 (5-25) mg to 0 (0-5) mg at 1 year, with 14 of 20 (70%) able to stop prednisolone altogether. Clinical remission was achieved in 16 of 37 (43%). Patients who achieved remission had a higher pre-IL-5/5R fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level (85 [39-198] parts per billion [ppb] vs 75 [42-96] ppb, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in clinical outcomes are possible after a switch to dupilumab in patients experiencing a suboptimal response to anti-IL-5/5R therapies. A higher FeNO in poor responders to anti-IL-5/5R who achieve remission with dupilumab is suggestive of an IL-13-driven subphenotype of T2-high asthma in which the eosinophil appears unlikely to play a key role in the disease pathogenesis.

Treatment strategies for ANCA-associated vasculitides: from standard protocols to future horizons.

INTRODUCTION: ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV), classified into granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis represent a group of disorders characterized by necrotizing vasculitis of small vessels, endothelial injury and tissue damage. The outcomes and prognosis of AAV have undergone significant changes with the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil). The enhanced understanding of pathogenesis has subsequently led to the incorporation into clinical practice of drugs targeting specific therapeutic targets. AREAS COVERED: After an extensive literature search of Pubmed, Medline, Embase of the most recent evidence, we provide an overview of available treatments, highlighting how newer drugs have integrated into standard protocols. Our review also explores potential new therapeutic targets, including B cell depletion and inhibition, T cell inhibition, complement inhibition, and IL-5 and IgE inhibition. EXPERT OPINION: There is hope that the new treatment targets currently under study in AAV may enable a faster and more lasting clinical response, ensuring the reduction of possible side effects from therapies. Moreover, numerous aspects necessitate further exploration in the future, such as tailoring of GCs, integration of GCs-sparing agents, efficacy of combination therapy, optimal maintenance therapy, to reduce organ-damage and improve quality of life.

Monocentric study of IL-5 monoclonal antibody induction therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

OBJECTIVE: Although sporadic case reports have demonstrated successful management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) by anti-IL-5 therapy, larger-scale monocentric studies for the efficacy of mepolizumab (MEP), an IL-5 monoclonal antibody, are still lacking in Taiwan. METHODS: Hospitalized EGPA patients aged at least 18 years were enrolled from November 1998 to October 2023, and analyzed for demographic, clinical, laboratory, medication and outcome data, focusing on the efficacy and safety of biologics use, particularly induction therapy with MEP. RESULTS: Twenty-seven EGPA patients aged 10-70 years (43 ± 15) at disease diagnosis were recruited with 21 under combined corticosteroids/cyclophosphamide induction therapy. Seventeen patients received biologics with 13 under MEP therapy. Ten patients aged 19-71 years (48 ± 15) completed 12-month induction therapy with a 100 mg quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen indicated for active or relapse disease. There were reduced BVAS with complete remission in 6 and partial remission in 4 patients, lower CRP levels, decreased eosinophil counts with an inhibition of 92∼96 %, and tapered prednisolone dosages from 5 to 25 (13.0 ± 6.3) to 0-10 (3.3 ± 3.1) mg/day. Only one patient had an adverse event of injection site reactions. Nine patients received the same regimen for annual maintenance therapy. All had a persistent clinical remission. In these patients, 13-56 injections (41 ± 15) were prescribed with a follow-up period of 12∼52 months (38 ± 14). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, induction therapy with a 12-month 100 mg MEP quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen demonstrates the efficacy and safety for active and relapsing EGPA patients.

Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5R biologics for severe asthma. Are there any differences in their effects?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective multicentre study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα therapies and to compare their effectiveness. METHODS: We collected and analysed results separately for anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies from January 2016 until December 2021 in multidisciplinary severe asthma units. We collected demographic and clinical data, treatment with previous anti-IgE and/or anti-IL-5 agents, and comorbidities. We compared the number of exacerbations and admissions to the hospital, daily oral corticosteroid intake, pulmonary function tests, and Asthma Control Test scores before and after 12 months of therapy. 261 patients were included: 176 patients in the anti-IL-5 group and 85 in the anti-IL-5Rα group. RESULTS: Both groups led to statistically significant reductions in asthma exacerbations, hospital admissions, and visits to the Emergency Room. Although both groups showed a significant reduction in blood eosinophiliccount, we found a difference, although not significant, in the magnitude of reduction as benralizumab was able to decrease eosinophil counts to zero. Patients in the anti-IL-5 group achieved higher ACT scores after treatment, although this improvement was seen in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα biologics have shown similar effectiveness despite having different mechanisms of action. The anti-IL-5 group appeared to be better than benralizumab at improving ACT scores and FEV1/FVC and at reducing the number of inhalers. Although these differences were not statistically significant, it is not clear whether they may have clinical relevance and they might highlight the need for further head-to-head studies comparing these treatments.

Super-responders to anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5R are characterised by high sputum eosinophil counts at baseline.

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that anti-IL-5(R) biologics were able to improve lung function, asthma control and chronic oral corticosteroid exposure and reduce exacerbations among eosinophilic asthmatic patients. However, a certain variability in clinical responses to anti-IL-5(R) biologics was brought to light. Our study aimed at evaluating the role of baseline sputum eosinophils in identifying super-responders to mepolizumab and benralizumab. Our study reinforces the importance to examine sputum eosinophils in patients suffering from severe asthma before starting a biologic as it is associated with the intensity of response to mepolizumab and benralizumab.

Targeting the interleukin-5 pathway improves cough hypersensitivity in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

BACKGROUND: Capsaicin cough sensitivity (C-CS) reflects airway neuronal dysfunction and may be a significant biomarker of asthma. Although mepolizumab reduces cough in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, it is unclear whether the cough reduction is associated with improved C-CS. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the effect of biologics on C-CS and cough-specific quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma using our previous study cohort. METHODS: Overall, 52 consecutive patients who visited our hospital for severe uncontrolled asthma were included in the original study cohort, and 30 patients were eligible for this study. Changes in C-CS and cough-specific QoL were compared between patients treated with the anti-interleukin-5 (IL-5) pathway (n = 16) and those treated with other biologics (n = 14). The C-CS was measured as the concentration of capsaicin required to induce at least 5 coughs. RESULTS: Biologics significantly improved C-CS (P = .03). Anti-IL-5 pathway therapies significantly improved C-CS, whereas other biologics did not (P < .01 and P = .89, respectively). The C-CS improved significantly more in the anti-IL-5 pathway group than in the group treated with other biologics (P = .02). Changes in C-CS significantly correlated with improvements in cough-specific QoL in the anti-IL-5 pathway group (r = 0.58, P = .01) but not in the group treated with other biologics (r = 0.35, P = .22). CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-5 pathway therapies improve C-CS and cough-specific QoL, and targeting the IL-5 pathway may be a therapeutic strategy for cough hypersensitivity in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Mepolizumab para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica / Mepolizumab for the treatment of severe asthma eosinophilic

INTRODUCCIÓN: Según la Guía 2021 de la Iniciativa Global para el Asma (Global Initiative for Asthma-GINA), institución creada en 1993 en colaboración entre el Instituto Nacional de Salud de EEUU (NIH) y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), si bien existen parámetros para determinar la gravedad del asma, la misma debe establecerse en forma retrospectiva, después de haber tratado al paciente por lo menos durante 2 o 3 meses y haber evaluado el resultado de la terapia en términos del control de los síntomas y reducción de las exacerbaciones. El asma se considera grave cuando presenta dificultad para su control a pesar del tratamiento optimizado con dosis altas de corticosteroides inhalados (CI) y ß-2 adrenérgicos de acción corta. Se estima que el asma grave posee una prevalencia de 5-10% respecto a la población asmática. Con respecto al parámetro "control del asma", incluye dos componentes: el control de síntomas y el riesgo futuro. La función pulmonar constituye un aspecto importante en la evaluación del riesgo y en la evolución del cuadro clínico. El asma grave presenta pruebas funcionales iniciales que muestran VEF1 y/o PFE < 60 %. Es recomendable medir estos parámetros en forma basal al inicio del tratamiento, y luego de 3 a 6 meses de aplicar la terapéutica seleccionada (para identificar la mejor marca personal del paciente) y posteriormente en forma periódica, medir su evolución. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la eficacia, seguridad, recomendaciones de las principales GPC, políticas de cobertura y aspectos económicos de mepolizumab para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos y niños ≥ 6 años con asma grave eosinofílica. METODOLOGÍA: Se identificaron estudios contra placebo y comparaciones indirectas. Luego de la evaluación de la calidad de los estudios identificados se incluyen en este informe una revisión sistemática, dos metaanálisis en red para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de mepolizumab comparada con placebo y fármacos biológicos en pacientes con asma grave eosinofílica. Adicionalmente fueron incluidas 7 guías de practica clínica y 6 políticas de cobertura. No fueron identificados estudios en pacientes menores de 12 años, ni que comparen de manera directa la respuesta a los fármacos biológicos entre sí para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica, , como tampoco estudios de 5 o más años de duración para estimar la seguridad a largo plazo. RESULTADOS: Se presentan los resultados globales de la búsqueda bibliográfica y el flujograma que muestra las distintas instancias de valoración de los artículos identificados, de acuerdo a los criterios de inclusión y exclusión definidos a través de los componentes de la pregunta PICO, concluyendo con el número de artículos seleccionados para el contenido del presente informe. Se identificaron estudios contra placebo y comparaciones indirectas. Luego de la evaluación de la calidad de los estudios identificados se incluyen en este informe una revisión sistemática (RS), dos metaanálisis en red (MAR) para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de mepolizumab comparada con placebo y comparaciones indirectas entre los productos biológicos en pacientes con asma grave eosinofílica. Adicionalmente fueron incluidas 7 guías de práctica clínica y 6 políticas de cobertura. No fueron identificados estudios en pacientes menores de 12 años, ni que comparen de manera directa la respuesta a los fármacos biológicos entre sí para el tratamiento de asma grave eosinofílica. CONCLUSIONES: Con respecto a la eficacia, de mepolizumab comparado con placebo: Disminuye un 7% las exacerbaciones que requieren internación (evidencia de alta calidad). No disminuye la utilización de medicación de rescate (evidencia de alta calidad). Probablemente mejora el control del asma (sin alcanzar la diferencia mínima relevante), la calidad de vida (evaluada con cuestionario no específico para asma) y la función pulmonar (evidencia de moderada calidad). Con respecto a la eficacia, de mepolizumab comparado a otros biológicos: No existe evidencia que compare de manera directa la efectividad y seguridad de mepolizumab versus otros comparadores activos como benralizumab y/o dupilumab. Evidencia de baja calidad (comparaciones indirectas) sugiere que podría no haber diferencias en la reducción del número de exacerbaciones anuales entre ellos. Con respecto a su seguridad el efecto es muy incierto y se carece de estudios de larga duración (evidencia de muy baja calidad): No existen comparaciones directas de mepolizumab con otros biológicos. No existen ECAs que evalúen niños ≤ 12 años de edad. Con respecto al impacto económico: El costo anual de tratamiento por paciente del mepolizumab es el menor de los 3 medicamentos estudiados. El costo anual de tratamiento por paciente con mepolizumab es un 38,1% menor que con benralizumab y un 78,2% menor que con dupilumab. El costo farmacológico del tratamiento anual de toda la población con asma grave eosinofílica supera el umbral de alto impacto presupuestario en 81 veces sin la introducción del mepolizumab y en 53,7 veces en el escenario con utilización del mismo.