Enriching Spiritual Care in Medical Residents Through Cultural Humility and Courage.

Introduction: While many patients desire spiritual care, it is infrequently provided by physicians. When a model of cultural humility and courage is employed, resident physicians can be introduced to the spiritual care of patients. Methods: We developed this 90-minute, onetime session to speak directly to resident physicians about the relationships between medicine and spirituality and the nature of spiritual care. In the session, we facilitated residents in reflecting on their current posture toward spiritual care while addressing its evidence, obstacles, and timing. We also discussed the need for cultural humility and courage as we followed spiritual care to its root: guiding a person in finding meaning in their current circumstances. Results: We presented this interactive session to 35 internal medicine residents from all four training years. All residents responded to an embedded pre- and postsurvey question modeled after four attitudes towards spiritual care: rejecting, guarded, pragmatic, and embracing. Out of 22 residents who did not report embracing spiritual care in the presession survey, 10 (45%) reported a more positive attitude toward spiritual care on their postcourse surveys. Twenty-seven residents in attendance (77%) also provided feedback about presentation quality, with a mean rating of 4.7 out of 5 indicating overall satisfaction. Discussion: A single well-received session on spiritual care for medical residents models the integration of relevant spiritual care curricula into residency training. The resulting module can be modified for physicians of any specialty or seniority and complemented by other skill-based spiritual care curricula.

In-hospital use of antibiotics in internal medicine: A cross-sectional study before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in a COVID-19-free ward.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients. However, most data on antibiotic therapy (AT) were recorded in COVID-19 settings. This study analyzed the appropriateness of AT in the real-world scenario of a COVID-19-free internal medicine ward before, during, and after the pandemic. METHODS: Clinical information of hospitalized patients was collected, and data related to AT prescription were analyzed. The appropriateness of AT was independently assessed by two specialists in internal medicine and infectious disease, combining evidence-based guidelines with a validated tool. RESULTS: Records of 1249 patients were analyzed: AT was prescribed in 229 (55.2 %) patients before, 134 (53.2 %) patients during, and 315 (54.1 %) patients after COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, there was a decrease in monotherapy with 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, and an increase in ß-lactams + ß-lactamase inhibitors and antibiotic combinations. Furthermore, AT was longer and more expensive during the pandemic, with duration and cost remaining higher after its end. The inappropriateness of AT increased during and after COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, inappropriate AT was longer and more expensive than appropriate AT. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on changes related to AT type and antibiotic classes. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the inappropriateness of AT in a COVID-19-free internal medicine ward. Most modifications persist despite the end of pandemic, potentially leading to negative effects on in-hospital antimicrobial resistance. There is an urgent need to re-establish antimicrobial stewardship policies to address the longer-term global threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Using a Chat-Based Trivia Activity to Foster Community in Residency.

OBJECTIVES: For residency programs rotating at multiple sites, building a strong community can be challenging when house staff are geographically separated. Medical educators have had widespread use of technology to create virtual classrooms, discussion boards, and other activities. Less is known, however, about smaller-scale use of technology such as longitudinal use of chat to engage learners. We developed a chat-based trivia activity using social media tools to promote learning, community, and belonging in a large multisite residency program. METHODS: Residents in our large academic program were invited to participate in a question-based activity called Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays (IMTT) via the chat application GroupMe. Three to five questions were asked of all of the participants using a multimedia format. Question content included topics from the residency didactic curriculum and trivia about program leadership. A voluntary, anonymous survey on the effect of the activity on learning and belonging was sent to all of the residents at the end of the academic year. RESULTS: Of the 224 residents, there were 48 survey respondents (21.4% response rate). When asked about overall satisfaction with the program, 43.8% (21/48) of all of the respondents reported feeling "somewhat satisfied" or "very satisfied." Residents who frequently participated in Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays experienced greater excitement about learning and a greater sense of community compared with those with infrequent to no participation. CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention used a theoretical framework of connectivism to design a virtual learning activity to engage residents, as well as to foster community among residents and between residents and program leadership. We believe this virtual learning experience is low cost and feasible, requiring mostly facilitator time. This study also contributes to the literature by evaluating outcomes related to social belonging and engagement. Future iterations should aim to optimize the methods of delivery by considering user-friendliness and the ability to opt out of the activity.

Practice Makes Perfect: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Across the UME-to-GME Continuum Improve Care of Transgender Simulated Patients.

Background Residents lack confidence in caring for transgender individuals. More exposure and practice throughout training is needed. Objective To explore whether and how prior exposure to transgender health skills during medical school impacted competency with these skills during residency. Methods In 2022, all 101 internal medicine residents at New York University Grossman School of Medicine participated in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station as part of their annual formative assessment where they cared for a standardized patient (SP) who identified as transgender. Three SPs who were members of the transgender community were recruited through online and social media forums. Two resident groups (continuum vs noncontinuum) differed in their prior experiences with transgender OSCEs during medical school. We analyzed SPs' ratings of resident performance using checklist data and SP open-ended feedback to compare performance between groups and resident post-OSCE evaluations to understand residents' perceptions of the educational value of the case. Results Residents with prior experience with transgender SPs (continuum) were more frequently recommended by SPs (88% [21 of 24] vs 70% [54 of 77]) to a family member or friend, were all rated professional (100% [24 of 24] vs 94% [72 of 94]) and scored better in pain information-gathering (92% vs 65%, mean summary score) and gender-affirming care skills (67% vs 52%, mean summary score). Noncontinuum residents lacked experience, missed opportunities to ask about gender identity, and needed work on demonstrating comfort and using proper language. Most residents completing a post-OSCE evaluation (80%, 41 of 51) rated the case as "very valuable." Conclusions Spaced practice and feedback through early exposure to transgender OSCEs were valuable for skill acquisition, giving continuum residents a learning advantage compared to noncontinuum residents.

A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Program Directors' Perspectives on Short-Term Hospitalist Employment Prior to Fellowship.

Background Some internal medicine (IM) residents pursuing subspecialty training choose short-term hospitalist employment prior to fellowship, or "pre-fellowship hospitalist years." Residency and fellowship program directors (PDs) advise residents on this decision, but PD experience with fellows pursuing pre-fellowship hospitalist years and the impact on fellowship applications is unknown. Objective We aimed to explore perceptions of fellowship PDs regarding experience with fellows who pursued pre-fellowship hospitalist years, including perceived effects on how such years affect fellowship application candidacy. Methods A purposive sample of 20 fellowship PDs in the most highly competitive and commonly selected IM fellowships (cardiology, pulmonology/critical care medicine, hematology/oncology, gastroenterology) from 5 academic institutions were approached for participation in fall 2021. Interviews included semi-structured questions about pre-fellowship hospitalist employment. Utilizing rapid qualitative analysis, interview transcripts were summarized and reviewed to identify themes and subthemes describing fellowship PDs' perspectives of pre-fellowship hospitalist years. Results Sixteen fellowship PDs (80%) participated. PDs identified 4 major themes as important for trainees considering pre-fellowship hospitalist years: (1) Explain the "Why"-why the year was pursued; (2) Characteristics of the Hospitalist Position-what type of employment; (3) The Challenges-potential concerns faced with pre-fellowship hospitalist years; and (4) Describe the "What"-the experience's contribution to resident professional development. Conclusions Fellowship PDs in 4 competitive IM subspecialities placed a strong emphasis on explaining a clear, logical reason for seeking short-term hospitalist employment prior to fellowship, describing how it fits into the overall career trajectory, and selecting activities that demonstrate continued commitment to the subspecialty.

Mobile Application to Improve Just-in-Time 2-Way Formative Feedback in Graduate Medical Education.

Background An easy-to-use application to facilitate direct observation and allow for 2-way feedback between residents and faculty is needed. Objective To develop a mobile-based application (app) with the goals of (1) providing just-in-time feedback to residents; (2) improving timeliness of feedback by faculty; and (3) allowing residents to comment on the value of faculty feedback. Methods Fifty-one of 69 (74%) internal medicine (IM) residents and 20 of 25 (80%) IM core faculty participated in the study from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. An iOS app was designed by authors with expertise in medical education and application development to capture entrustable professional activities (EPAs)-based feedback (eg, informed consent) based on direct observation of residents' skills in the workplace. App utilization and narrative feedback characteristics of faculty comments were examined by exporting the data from the database server. The end user satisfaction was examined using a survey instrument. Results Eighty-seven percent of assessments (117 of 134) initiated were fully completed by residents and faculty. Faculty narrative comments were noted in 97% (114 of 117) of completed assessments and 64% (75 of 117) of residents' feedback to the faculty contained narrative comments. Eighty-three percent (97 of 117) of comments were behaviorally specific and 71% (83 of 117) contained an actionable item. Eighty-six percent (18 of 21) of residents and 90% (9 of 10) of core faculty stated that this application promoted an educational interaction between them. Conclusions This app facilitates the efficient completion of EPA-based formative assessments and captures bidirectional feedback in the workplace setting.

Applications to augment patient care for Internal Medicine specialists: a position paper from the EFIM working group on telemedicine, innovative technologies & digital health.

Telemedicine applications present virtually limitless prospects for innovating and enhancing established and new models of patient care in the field of Internal Medicine. Although there is a wide range of innovative technological solutions in Europe, there are overarching elements associated with such technologies when applied to the practices of Internal Medicine specialists. The European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM) strongly advocates for active leadership and influence from the Internal Medicine societies and specialist physicians across Europe in the development and application of telemedicine and digital technologies in healthcare. This position paper's conclusions were drawn via Delphi method, which was developed collaboratively from July 2021 to December 2023. The panel, consisting of experts in clinical medicine, public health, health economics and statistics, assessed various aspects related to telemedicine. Participants assigned scores on a Likert scale reflecting perceived value and potential risks. The findings were consolidated in a comprehensive checklist aligning with relevant literature and a SWOT analysis. Specifically, key issues that need to be addressed include promoting the professional development of e-health competencies in the healthcare and medical workforce, using educational campaigns to promote digital literacy among patients and caregivers, designing and implementing telemedicine applications tailored to local conditions and needs and considering the ethical and legal contexts under which these applications are employed. Importantly, there is currently no consensus on care models or standardized protocols among European Internal Medicine specialists regarding the utilization of telemedicine. This position paper aims to outline the opportunities and challenges associated with the application of telemedicine in Internal Medical practice in Europe.

Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various healthcare domains, where AI algorithms sometimes even outperform human specialists. However, the field of clinical ethics has remained largely untouched by AI advances. This study explores the attitudes of anesthesiologists and internists towards the use of AI-driven preference prediction tools to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and pretested among medical students. The questionnaire was distributed to 200 German anesthesiologists and 200 German internists, thereby focusing on physicians who often encounter patients lacking decision-making capacity. The questionnaire covered attitudes toward AI-driven preference prediction, availability and utilization of Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS), and experiences with ethically challenging situations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis was performed. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis in a mixed inductive-deductive approach. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly male (69.3%), with ages ranging from 27 to 77. Most worked in nonacademic hospitals (82%). Physicians generally showed hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction, citing concerns about the loss of individuality and humanity, lack of explicability in AI results, and doubts about AI's ability to encompass the ethical deliberation process. In contrast, physicians had a more positive opinion of CESS. Availability of CESS varied, with 81.8% of participants reporting access. Among those without access, 91.8% expressed a desire for CESS. Physicians' reluctance toward AI-driven preference prediction aligns with concerns about transparency, individuality, and human-machine interaction. While AI could enhance the accuracy of predictions and reduce surrogate burden, concerns about potential biases, de-humanisation, and lack of explicability persist. CONCLUSIONS: German physicians frequently encountering incapacitated patients exhibit hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction but hold a higher esteem for CESS. Addressing concerns about individuality, explicability, and human-machine roles may facilitate the acceptance of AI in clinical ethics. Further research into patient and surrogate perspectives is needed to ensure AI aligns with patient preferences and values in complex medical decisions.

Can internal medicine specialists diagnose functional somatic disorders (FSDs)? Training and comparison with FSD specialists.

BACKGROUND: Functional somatic disorders (FSD) are a common problem across medical settings and remain challenging to diagnose and treat. Many patients with FSD undergo sequential and unnecessary extensive diagnostic work-up, which is costly for society and stressful for patients. Previous studies have shown that the empirically based FSD diagnostic entities are interrater reliable and stable over time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether internists who have received adequate training and with sufficient time per patient could diagnose FSD. DESIGN: This was a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. The study was conducted from May 2020 to April 2022. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 27 consecutive patients referred by their general practitioner to a non-psychiatric diagnostic clinic for assessment of physical symptoms on suspicion of FSD. INTERVENTIONS: The internists received a 30-hour training course in the use of a tailored version of the SCAN interview. MAIN MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the agreement between the diagnoses of the internists and the reference diagnoses made by specialists in FSD on the basis of the full SCAN interview. KEY RESULTS: The interrater agreement between the internists and the FSD experts was substantial for any FSD (kappa = 0.63) as well as multi-organ vs. single-organ FSD (kappa = 0.73), indicating good diagnostic agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Internists with proper training and sufficient time (3-4 hours) per patient can proficiently diagnose FSD employing a tailored version of the SCAN interview for use in a non-psychiatric diagnostic setting.

Acute internal medicine physicians' clinical intuition based on acute care telephone referral: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: In the Netherlands, most emergency department (ED) patients are referred by a general practitioner (GP) or a hospital specialist. Early risk stratification during telephone referral could allow the physician to assess the severity of the patients' illness in the prehospital setting. We aim to assess the discriminatory value of the acute internal medicine (AIM) physicians' clinical intuition based on telephone referral of ED patients to predict short-term adverse outcomes, and to investigate on which information their predictions are based. METHODS: In this prospective study, we included adult ED patients who were referred for internal medicine by a GP or a hospital specialist. Primary outcomes were hospital admission and triage category according to the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Secondary outcome was 31-day mortality. The discriminatory performance of the clinical intuition was assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). To identify which information is important to predict adverse outcomes, we performed univariate regression analysis. Agreement between predicted and observed MTS triage category was assessed using intraclass and Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: We included 333 patients, of whom 172 (51.7%) were referred by a GP, 146 (43.8%) by a hospital specialist, and 12 (3.6%) by another health professional. The AIM physician's clinical intuition showed good discriminatory performance regarding hospital admission (AUC 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66-0.78) and 31-day mortality (AUC 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.81). Univariate regression analysis showed that age ≥65 years and a sense of alarm were significant predictors. The predicted and observed triage category were similar in 45.2%, but in 92.5% the prediction did not deviate by more than one category. Intraclass and Spearman's correlation showed fair agreement between predicted and observed triage category (ICC 0.48, Spearman's 0.29). CONCLUSION: Clinical intuition based on relevant information during a telephone referral can be used to accurately predict short-term outcomes, allowing for early risk stratification in the prehospital setting and managing ED patient flow more effectively.

Medical residents' perceptions of group biases in medical decision making: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Systematic biases in group decision making (i.e., group biases) may result in suboptimal decisions and potentially harm patients. It is not well known how impaired group decision making in patient care may affect medical training. This study aimed to explore medical residents' experiences and perspectives regarding impaired group decision making and the role of group biases in medical decision making. METHODS: This study used a qualitative approach with thematic analysis underpinned by a social constructionist epistemology. Semi-structured interviews of medical residents were conducted at a single internal medicine residency program. Residents were initially asked about their experiences with suboptimal medical decision making as a group or team. Then, questions were targeted to several group biases (groupthink, social loafing, escalation of commitment). Interviews were transcribed and transferred to a qualitative data analysis software. Thematic analysis was conducted to generate major themes within the dataset. RESULTS: Sixteen interviews with residents revealed five major themes: (1) hierarchical influence on group decision making; (2) group decision making under pressure; (3) post-call challenges in decision making; (4) interactions between teamwork and decision making; and (5) personal and cultural influences in group decision making. Subthemes were also identified for each major theme. Most residents were able to recognize groupthink in their past experiences working with medical teams. Residents perceived social loafing or escalation of commitment as less relevant for medical team decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide unique insights into the complexities of group decision making processes in teaching hospitals. Team hierarchy significantly influenced residents' experiences with group decision making-most group decisions were attributed to consultants or senior team members, while lower ranking team members contributed less and perceived fewer opportunities to engage in group decisions. Other factors such as time constraints on decision making, perceived pressures from other staff members, and challenges associated with post-call days were identified as important barriers to optimal group decision making in patient care. Future studies may build upon these findings to enhance our understanding of medical team decision making and develop strategies to improve group decisions, ultimately leading to higher quality patient care and training.

Implementation of a "Best Self" Exercise to Decrease Imposter Phenomenon in Residents.

Background Imposter phenomenon (IP) is common in medicine. An intervention from the business world, the Reflected Best Self Exercise (RBSE), in which an individual elicits stories of themselves at their best, has not been studied in medical residents. Objective To determine the feasibility of implementing the RBSE and its potential for reducing IP in residents. Methods All incoming internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics interns in the 2022-2023 academic year at a single institution were invited to complete the RBSE. Participants elicited stories from contacts prior to beginning residency and received their stories during intern orientation in a 1-hour session led by one author with no prior training. Cost and time requirements were assessed. IP was measured via the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months following the RBSE. Informal feedback on the RBSE was collected via surveys at 1 month and 6 months. Results Nineteen of 35 interns (54.3%) completed the RBSE. It cost $75 per participant, for a total cost of $1,425. Twenty-eight of 35 (80%) completed the baseline CIPS, with scores similar between participants and nonparticipants (64.9 vs 68.9). CIPS scores were lower in participants at 1 month (57.6 vs 69.6) and 6 months (55.6 vs 64.5) but did not meet statistical significance. Survey feedback from participants suggested the intervention was beneficial. Conclusions Implementing the RBSE in residents was feasible with reasonable cost and time commitment. It appeared highly acceptable to residents, with some promise of effects on an IP scale.

Comparing Perceptions of Virtual and In-Person Interviews: Results From a National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.

Background Since 2020, virtual interviews have become the typical way in which applicants assess residency programs. It is unknown whether the change from in-person to virtual interviews has been associated with changes in perceptions of the quality of information gathered by prospective applicants. Objective To ascertain perspectives on the satisfaction with, quality of, and accuracy of information gathered by internal medicine (IM) residency applicants from virtual and in-person interviews. Methods Twenty-nine thousand, seven hundred and seventy-six residents from US and Puerto Rico residency programs sitting for the 2022 American College of Physicians Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) were surveyed. An optional, 5-question survey was administered at the end of the examination. Responses were analyzed based on interview format-virtual (postgraduate year [PGY]-1-2) or in-person (PGY-3)-and PGY. Results Of 29 776, 23 161 residents responded to the survey (77.8% response rate). Regardless of PGY, respondents reported a high degree of satisfaction with the quality of information gathered from their interview day, though there was a statistically significant difference between virtual and in-person [somewhat/very satisfied: In-person 5938 of 7410 (80.1%); 95% CI [79.2, 81.0] vs virtual 12 070 of 15 751 (76.6%); 95% CI [76.0, 77.3]:P<.001]. Residents in all PGYs reported sessions with residents and one-on-one interviews as the most important factors when creating their rank lists. Conclusions We found differences in satisfaction and perceptions of the quality of information gathered between IM residents who participated in virtual and in-person interviews. However, regardless of format, most respondents reported satisfaction with their interview experience.

Feedback in an Entrustment-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Analysis of Content and Scoring Methods.

Background The integration of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) within objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) has yielded a valuable avenue for delivering timely feedback to residents. However, concerns about feedback quality persist. Objective This study aimed to assess the quality and content alignment of verbal feedback provided by examiners during an entrustment-based OSCE. Methods We conducted a progress test OSCE for internal medicine residents in 2022, assessing 7 EPAs. The immediate 2-minute feedback provided by examiners was recorded and analyzed using the Quality of Assessment of Learning (QuAL) score. We also analyzed the degree of alignment with EPA learning objectives: competency milestones and task-specific abilities. In a randomized crossover experiment, we compared the impact of 2 scoring methods used to assess residents' clinical performance (3-point entrustability scales vs task-specific checklists) on feedback quality and alignment. Results Twenty-one examiners provided feedback to 67 residents. The feedback demonstrated high quality (mean QuAL score 4.3 of 5) and significant alignment with the learning objectives of the EPAs. On average, examiners addressed in their feedback 2.5 milestones (61%) and 1.2 task-specific abilities (46%). The scoring methods used had no significant impact on QuAL scores (95% CI -0.3, 0.1, P=.28), alignment with competency milestones (95% CI -0.4, 0.1, P=.13), or alignment with task-specific abilities (95% CI -0.3, 0.1, P=.29). Conclusions In our entrustment-based OSCE, examiners consistently offered valuable feedback aligned with intended learning outcomes. Notably, we explored high-quality feedback and alignment as separate dimensions, finding no significant impact from our 2 scoring methods on either aspect.

Time and Note Characteristic Effects of an Electronic Health Record Template for Internal Medicine Resident Notes.

Background Inpatient internal medicine (IM) residents spend most of their time on indirect patient care activities such as clinical documentation. Objective We developed optimized electronic health record (EHR) templates for IM resident admission and progress notes, with the objective to reduce note-writing time, shorten note length, and decrease the percentage of progress note text that was copy-forwarded from prior notes. Methods In 2022, a multidisciplinary team created, over an 8-month period, optimized EHR templates for IM resident admission and progress notes. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess differences in resident time spent writing notes, note length in characters, and percentage of progress note text that was copy-forwarded. All 94 residents in the IM residency program had the opportunity to use the novel templates. Results Following implementation of the novel templates, residents spent on average 3.6 minutes less per progress note compared to pre-intervention (P=.008; 95% CI of the difference: 1.1-6.0 minutes). Notes in the post-intervention period were shorter for admission notes (mean reduction of 1041 characters; P<.001; 95% CI of the difference: 448-1634 characters) and progress notes (mean reduction of 764 characters; P<.001; 95% CI of the difference: 103-1426 characters). Progress notes also saw an average 22% decrease of copy-forwarded text (P<.001, 95% CI of the difference: 18.7%-25.4%). Conclusions The optimized note templates led to a reduction in resident progress note-writing time, shortened note length, and a lower percentage of copy-forwarded text.

Designing a touchless physical examination for a virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

Purpose: Given the COVID-19 pandemic, many Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) have been adapted to virtual formats without addressing whether physical examination maneuvers can or should be assessed virtually. In response, we developed a novel touchless physical examination station for a virtual OSCE and gathered validity evidence for its use. Methods: We used a touchless physical examination OSCE station pilot-tested in a virtual OSCE in which Internal Medicine residents had to verbalize their approach to the physical examination, interpret images and videos of findings provided upon request, and make a diagnosis. We explored differences in performance by training year using ANOVA. In addition, we analyzed data using elements of Bloom's taxonomy of learning, i.e. knowledge, understanding, and synthesis. Results: Sixty-seven residents (PGY1-3) participated in the OSCE. Scores on the pilot station were significantly different between training levels (F=3.936, p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.11). The pilot station-total correlation (STC) was r = 0.558, and the item-station correlations ranged from r = 0.115-0.571, with the most discriminating items being those that assessed application of knowledge (interpretation and synthesis) rather than recall. Conclusion: This touchless physical examination station was feasible, had acceptable psychometric characteristics, and discriminated between residents at different levels of training.

Objet: Compte tenu de la pandémie de COVID-19, de nombreux examens cliniques objectifs structurés (ECOS) ont été adaptés vers un format virtuel sans que l'on se questionne à savoir si les manœuvres d'examen physique peuvent ou doivent être évaluées virtuellement. Conséquemment, nous avons développé une nouvelle station d'examen physique sans contact pour un ECOS virtuel et recueilli des preuves de validité concernant son utilisation. Méthodes: Nous avons utilisé une station d'examen physique sans contact testée dans le cadre d'un ECOS virtuel pendant lequel les résidents en médecine interne devaient verbaliser leur approche concernant l'examen physique, interpréter des images et des vidéos d'examens fournis sur demande, et poser un diagnostic. Nous avons étudié les différences de rendement en fonction de l'année de formation à l'aide de l'ANOVA. En outre, nous avons analysé les données en utilisant les éléments de la taxonomie de l'apprentissage de Bloom, c'est-à-dire la connaissance, la compréhension et la synthèse. Résultats: Soixante-sept résidents (PGY1-3) ont participé à l'ECOS. Les scores de la station pilote étaient significativement différents entre les niveaux de formation (F=3.936, p=0.024, ηp2=0.11). La corrélation totale de la station pilote (STC) était de r=0,558, et les corrélations question-station variaient de r=0,115-0,571, les questions les plus discriminantes étant celles qui évaluaient l'application (interprétation et synthèse) plutôt que le rappel de connaissances. Conclusion: Cette station d'examen physique sans contact était réalisable, a présenté des caractéristiques psychométriques acceptables et a permis d'établir une discrimination entre les résidents de différents niveaux de formation.

Making assessment a team sport: a qualitative study of facilitated group feedback in internal medicine residency.

Purpose: Competency-based medical education relies on feedback from workplace-based assessment (WBA) to direct learning. Unfortunately, WBAs often lack rich narrative feedback and show bias towards Medical Expert aspects of care. Building on research examining interactive assessment approaches, the Queen's University Internal Medicine residency program introduced a facilitated, team-based assessment initiative ("Feedback Fridays") in July 2017, aimed at improving holistic assessment of resident performance on the inpatient medicine teaching units. In this study, we aim to explore how Feedback Fridays contributed to formative assessment of Internal Medicine residents within our current model of competency-based training. Method: A total of 53 residents participated in facilitated, biweekly group assessment sessions during the 2017 and 2018 academic year. Each session was a 30-minute facilitated assessment discussion done with one inpatient team, which included medical students, residents, and their supervising attending. Feedback from the discussion was collected, summarized, and documented in narrative form in electronic WBA forms by the program's assessment officer for the residents. For research purposes, verbatim transcripts of feedback sessions were analyzed thematically. Results: The researchers identified four major themes for feedback: communication, intra- and inter-personal awareness, leadership and teamwork, and learning opportunities. Although feedback related to a broad range of activities, it showed strong emphasis on competencies within the intrinsic CanMEDS roles. Additionally, a clear formative focus in the feedback was another important finding. Conclusions: The introduction of facilitated team-based assessment in the Queen's Internal Medicine program filled an important gap in WBA by providing learners with detailed feedback across all CanMEDS roles and by providing constructive recommendations for identified areas for improvement.

Objectif: La formation médicale fondée sur les compétences s'appuie sur la rétroaction faite lors de l'évaluation des apprentissages par observation directe dans le milieu de travail. Malheureusement, les évaluations dans le milieu de travail omettent souvent de fournir une rétroaction narrative exhaustive et privilégient les aspects des soins relevant de l'expertise médicale. En se basant sur la recherche ayant étudié les approches d'évaluation interactive, le programme de résidence en médecine interne de l'Université Queen's a introduit en juillet 2017 une initiative d'évaluation facilitée et en équipe (« Les vendredis rétroaction ¼), visant à améliorer l'évaluation holistique du rendement des résidents dans les unités d'enseignement clinique en médecine interne. Dans cette étude, nous visons à explorer comment ces « vendredis rétroaction ¼ ont contribué à l'évaluation formative des résidents en médecine interne dans le cadre de notre modèle actuel de formation axée sur les compétences. Méthode: Au total, 53 résidents ont participé à des séances d'évaluation de groupe facilitées et bi-hebdomadaires au cours de l'année universitaire 2017-2018. Chaque séance consistait en une discussion d'évaluation facilitée de 30 minutes menée avec une équipe de l'unité de soins, qui comprenait des étudiants en médecine, des résidents et le médecin superviseur. Les commentaires issus de la discussion ont été recueillis, résumés et documentés sous forme narrative dans des formulaires électroniques d'observation directe dans le milieu de travail par le responsable de l'évaluation du programme de résidence. À des fins de recherche, les transcriptions verbatim des séances de rétroaction ont été analysées de façon thématique. Résultats: Les chercheurs ont identifié quatre thèmes principaux pour les commentaires : la communication, la conscience intra- et interpersonnelle, le leadership et le travail d'équipe, et les occasions d'apprentissage. Bien que la rétroaction concerne un large éventail d'activités, elle met fortement l'accent sur les compétences liées aux rôles intrinsèques de CanMEDS. De plus, le fait que la rétroaction avait un rôle clairement formatif est une autre constatation importante. Conclusions: L'introduction de l'évaluation en équipe facilitée dans le programme de médecine interne à Queen's a comblé une lacune importante dans l'apprentissage par observation directe dans le milieu de travail en fournissant aux apprenants une rétroaction détaillée sur tous les rôles CanMEDS et en formulant des recommandations constructives sur les domaines à améliorer.

Increasing Trainee Comfort with Nutrition.

OBJECTIVES: Nutrition counseling is necessary for the prevention and treatment of many chronic diseases. US survey data demonstrate that 61% of Internal Medicine (IM) residents receive little to no nutrition training. The objective of our study was to develop a curriculum to increase IM resident comfort and ability in conducting a nutritional assessment. METHODS: Categorical IM residents at a large academic medical center participated in a curriculum that included a lecture, a small-group discussion, and a skills exercise. Residents completed pre- and posttest surveys that evaluated their attitudes and comfort level with nutritional assessment. RESULTS: Eighty percent (84/105) of the residents participated in the curriculum and 48% (40/84) of them completed both pre- and postsession surveys. Residents who considered themselves moderately to extremely comfortable completing a nutritional assessment increased after the program (27.5% to 87.5%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of those who agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, "Nutritional counseling should be included in any routine appointment, just like diagnosis and treatment," increased from 62.50% to 80.00% (P = 0.012). The proportion of residents who considered lack of individual knowledge to be a barrier for nutrition counseling decreased from 65.79% to 42.11% (P = 0.0126). CONCLUSIONS: This curriculum was successful in increasing IM resident comfort with conducting a nutritional assessment.

Frontline assessors' opinions about grading committees in a medicine clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Collective decision-making by grading committees has been proposed as a strategy to improve the fairness and consistency of grading and summative assessment compared to individual evaluations. In the 2020-2021 academic year, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis (WUSM) instituted grading committees in the assessment of third-year medical students on core clerkships, including the Internal Medicine clerkship. We explored how frontline assessors perceive the role of grading committees in the Internal Medicine core clerkship at WUSM and sought to identify challenges that could be addressed in assessor development initiatives. METHODS: We conducted four semi-structured focus group interviews with resident (n = 6) and faculty (n = 17) volunteers from inpatient and outpatient Internal Medicine clerkship rotations. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants felt that the transition to a grading committee had benefits and drawbacks for both assessors and students. Grading committees were thought to improve grading fairness and reduce pressure on assessors. However, some participants perceived a loss of responsibility in students' grading. Furthermore, assessors recognized persistent challenges in communicating students' performance via assessment forms and misunderstandings about the new grading process. Interviewees identified a need for more training in formal assessment; however, there was no universally preferred training modality. CONCLUSIONS: Frontline assessors view the switch from individual graders to a grading committee as beneficial due to a perceived reduction of bias and improvement in grading fairness; however, they report ongoing challenges in the utilization of assessment tools and incomplete understanding of the grading and assessment process.

Malnutrition-Related Liver Steatosis, CONUT Score and Poor Clinical Outcomes in an Internal Medicine Department.

Fatty liver disease has been identified as a marker of malnutrition in different clinical settings. Recently, the COntrolling NUTritional status score (CONUT score) emerged as a promising tool for malnutrition assessment. Our aim was to evaluate short-term outcomes among patients with malnutrition-related liver steatosis in an Internal Medicine department. Furthermore, we evaluated the association of the CONUT score with malnutrition-related liver steatosis. Data from 247 patients hospitalized in an Internal Medicine department were retrospectively collected. The study population was stratified into three groups based on hepatic radiodensity assessed with computed tomography: mild steatosis (≥56.1 HU), moderate steatosis (between 49.7 and 56 HU), and severe steatosis (≤49.6 HU). We then calculated the CONUT score. Severe steatosis patients had higher in-hospital mortality (18.2 vs. 15.5%) and longer in-hospital stays compared with the mild steatosis group (length of in-hospital stay longer than 12 days: 45% vs. 40%). Logistic regression analysis showed that severe steatosis was not significantly associated with in-hospital all-cause death, while a high CONUT score was an independent risk factor for sepsis. We found an independent relationship between malnutrition-associated liver steatosis and the CONUT score. These results identified the CONUT score as a tool for nutritional assessment of hospitalized patients.