Surgery for intestinal injuries in very preterm infants: a Norwegian population-based study with a new approach to disease classification.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate population-based data on very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation) operated for intestinal injuries, focusing on necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP). DESIGN: Nationwide, population-based registry cohort study. SETTING: All 21 neonatal units in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: All very preterm infants born from 2014 through 2021 and admitted to a neonatal unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of surgery for subgroups of intestinal injuries, medical record data on laboratory-radiology results, anatomical location of affected bowel, length of resections, number of re-operations, morbidities of prematurity and/or death before discharge. RESULTS: Abdominal surgery was performed in 124/4009 (3.1%) very preterm infants and in 97/1300 (7.5%) extremely preterm infants <28 weeks. The main intestinal injuries operated were NEC (85/124; 69%), FIP (26/124; 21%) and 'other abdominal pathologies' (13/124; 10%). NEC cases were divided in (i) acute NEC, extensive disease (n=18), (ii) non-extensive disease (n=53) and (iii) NEC with surgery >3 days after disease onset (n=14). High lactate values immediately prior to surgery was predominantly seen in acute NEC-extensive disease and associated with high mortality. Other laboratory values could not discriminate between acute NEC and FIP. Timing of surgery for acute NEC and FIP overlapped. Radiological absence of portal venous gas was typical in FIP. Most infants (62.5%) underwent a stoma formation at initial surgery. The overall survival rate was 67% for NEC and 77% for FIP. CONCLUSION: NEC cases have different presentation and prognosis depending on the extent of bowel affected. Revised classifications for intestinal injuries in preterm infants may improve prognostication and better guide therapy.

Surgical repair of endoscopy-induced colonic perforations: a case-matched study of short-term morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the clinical outcomes of surgical interventions performed for the management of colonoscopy-related perforations and to compare these outcomes with those of matched colorectal surgeries performed in elective and emergency settings. METHODS: We included patients with endoscopic colonic perforation who underwent surgical intervention from the 2014-2017 National Surgery Quality Improvement Program participant use data colorectal targeted procedure file. The primary outcome in this study was short term surgical morbidity and mortality. Patients (group 1) were matched with 1:2 ratio to control patients undergoing same surgical interventions for other indications on an elective (group 2) or emergency basis (group 3). Bivariate analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables between the three groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the surgical indication and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients were included. The average age of the patients was 66.5±13.6 with female gender predominance (381, 64.6%) The majority of patients underwent open colectomy (365, 61.9%) while the rest had suturing (140, 23.7%) and laparoscopic colectomy (85, 14.4%). Overall mortality occurred in 4.1% and no statistically significant difference in mortality was found between the three techniques (P=0.468). Composite morbidity occurred in 163 patients (27.6%). It was significantly lower in laparoscopic colectomy (14.1%) compared to 30.2% and 29.4% in open colectomy and suturing approaches (P=0.014). Patients undergoing colectomy for iatrogenic colonic perforation had less mortality, infection rates and sepsis, as well as bleeding episodes compared to those who had colectomy on an emergent basis. Outcomes were comparable between the former group and patients undergoing elective colectomy for other indications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of colonoscopy related perforations is safe and effective with outcomes that are similar to that of patients undergoing elective colectomy.

Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the incidence and mortality rate of gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic tumors and assess its risk factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 4799 patients with malignant tumors who underwent RFA (n = 7206). Sixty-nine cases of thermal injury to the GI tract were identified via a search of the electronic medical record system using index terms and divided into two groups according to the thermal injury with (n = 8) or without (n = 61) GI tract perforation based on follow-up CT reports. The risk factors for GI tract perforation were identified via multivariable logistic regression analysis using clinical, technical, and follow-up CT findings. RESULTS: The incidence of thermal injury to the GI tract and GI tract perforation was 0.96 % (69/7206) and 0.11 % (8/7206), respectively. The type of adjacent GI tract and history of diabetes mellitus differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.05). The index tumor being located around the small intestine was the only significant risk factor for GI tract perforation after ablation (Odds ratio, 22.69; 95 % confidence interval, 2.59-198.34; p = 0.005 [reference standard, stomach]). All perforations were not identified on CT images immediately after RFA. The median time to detection was 20 days (range, 3-41 days). Two patients (25 %, 2/8) died due to perforation-related complications. CONCLUSION: GI tract perforation after RFA for hepatic tumors is rare; however, it is associated with high mortality. Thus, careful follow-up is required after RFA if the index tumor is located around the small intestine.

Predictors of En Bloc, R0 Resection, and Postprocedural Complications After Advanced Endoscopic Resections for Colorectal Neoplasms: Results of 1213 Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are used to treat colorectal neoplasms that are not amenable to conventional colonoscopic resection. Literature regarding the predictors of the outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections, especially from a colorectal surgical unit, is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of short-term and long-term outcomes after advanced endoscopic resections. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTINGS: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent advanced endoscopic resections for colorectal neoplasms from November 2011 to August 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection, and combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of en bloc and R0 resection, bleeding, and perforation were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cox regression models were used to determine the predictors of tumor recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 1213 colorectal lesions from 1047 patients were resected (median age 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years, 484 women [46.2%], median BMI 28.6 [interquartile range, 24.8-32.6]). Most neoplasms were in the proximal colon (898; 74%). The median lesion size was 30 (interquartile range, 20-40; range, 0-120) mm. Nine hundred eleven lesions (75.1%) underwent previous interventions. The most common Paris and Kudo classifications were 0 to IIa flat elevation (444; 36.6%) and IIIs (301; 24.8%), respectively. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 56.6% and 54.3%, respectively. Smaller lesions, rectal location, and procedure type (endoscopic submucosal dissection) were associated with significantly higher en bloc and R0 resection rates. Bleeding and perforation rates were 5% and 6.6%, respectively. Increased age was a predictor for bleeding (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; p < 0.0001). Lesion size was a predictor for perforation (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; p = 0.03). The tumor recurrence rate was 6.6%. En bloc (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.93; p = 0.02) and R0 resection (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.06; p = 0.008) were associated with decreased recurrence risk. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections can be predicted by patient-related and lesion-related characteristics. See Video Abstract . PREDICTORES DE LA RESECCION R, EN BLOQUE Y LAS COMPLICACIONES POR RESECCIONES ENDOSCPICAS AVANZADAS EN CASOS DE NEOPLASIA COLORRECTAL RESULTADOS DE PROCEDIMIENTOS: ANTECEDENTES:Las técnicas avanzadas de resección endoscópica se utilizan para el tratamiento de neoplasias colorrectales que no son susceptibles de resección colonoscópica convencional. La literatura sobre los predictores de los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas, especialmente en una unidad de cirugía colorrectal, es limitada.OBJETIVO:Determinar los predictores de resultados a corto y largo plazo después de resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.LUGAR:Centro de tercer nivel de atención.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas por neoplasias colorrectales desde noviembre de 2011 hasta agosto de 2022.INTERVENCIÓNES:Resección endoscópica de la mucosa, disección endoscópica submucosa (ESD), ESD híbrida, cirugía laparoscópica endoscópica combinada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los predictores de resección en bloque y R0, sangrado y perforación se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión logística univariables y multivariables. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de Cox para determinar los predictores de recurrencia del tumor.RESULTADOS:Se resecaron 1.213 lesiones colorrectales en 1.047 pacientes [edad media 66 (58-72) años, 484 (46,2%) mujeres, índice de masa corporal medio 28,6 (24,8-32,6) kg/m 2 ]. La mayoría de las neoplasias se encontraban en el colon proximal (898, 74%). El tamaño medio de la lesión fue de 30mm (RIC: 20-40, rango: 0-120). 911 (75,1%) lesiones tenían intervenciones previas. Las clasificaciones de París y Kudo más comunes fueron 0-IIa elevación plana (444, 36,6%) y III (301, 24,8%), respectivamente. Las tasas de resección en bloque y R0 fueron del 56,6% y 54,3%, respectivamente. Las lesiones más pequeñas, la ubicación rectal y el tipo de procedimiento (ESD) se asociaron con tasas de resección en bloque y R0 significativamente más altas. Las tasas de sangrado y perforación fueron del 5% y 6,6%, respectivamente. La edad avanzada [1,06 (1,03-1,09), p < 0,0001] fue un predictor de sangrado. El tamaño de la lesión [1,02 (1,00-1,03), p = 0,03] fue un predictor de perforación. La tasa de recurrencia del tumor fue del 6,6%. En bloque [HR 1,41 (IC 95% 1,05-1,93), p = 0,02] y la resección R0 [HR 1,49 (IC 95% 1,11-2,06), p = 0,008] se asociaron con un menor riesgo de recurrencia.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico, retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas pueden predecirse según las características del paciente y de la lesión. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Bevacizumab is associated with a higher gastrointestinal/genitourinary fistula or perforation risk in cervical cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab serves as an effective treatment in cervical cancer patients with metastatic, recurrent, or advanced disease. However, gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicities have been observed after bevacizumab treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay of treatment of cervical cancer. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the risk of GI/GU toxicities with bevacizumab plus RT compared with RT alone in cervical cancer patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: In this meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 25, 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort studies evaluating the association between bevacizumab and GI/GU fistula or perforation in irradiated metastatic, recurrent, or advanced cervical cancer patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The inconsistency test (I2) was used to assess heterogeneity. Egger's regression test with a two-tailed P value was used to evaluate publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: Four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 597 women included. There was a significant association between GI fistula/perforation and GU fistula/perforation in irradiated cervical cancer patients receiving bevacizumab (OR 4.03 [95% CI: 1.76-9.20] and OR 4.71 [95% CI: 1.51-14.70], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The bevacizumab-containing regimen was associated with an increased risk of GI or GU toxicities in cervical cancer individuals undergoing pelvic RT. These results suggest the bevacizumab-associated benefits and risk should be better weighted to reach an optimal treatment strategy. Further investigation on optimal dosage and timing of bevacizumab and RT is vital to minimize the adverse events and maximize the benefits.

Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm. It has been suggested recently that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AEs), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing. METHODS: In this randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. The primary outcome was major AE (eg, perforation or postendoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes, major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy syndrome, and residual adenoma were most relevant. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, there were 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% were female) enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AEs occurred in 1.0% of the cold group and in 7.9% of the hot group (P = .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.54). Rates for perforation and postendoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group, with 0% vs 3.9% (P = .007) and 1.0% vs 4.4% (P = .040). Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs 4.4%; P = .490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs 13.8% (P = .020; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4 cm was an independent predictor both for major AEs (OR, 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR, 2.47) and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR, 2.92). CONCLUSIONS: Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than hot EMR; however, at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to what extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach. German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), Number DRKS00025170.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Exposed to Janus Kinase Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real-world population of patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow-up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and proton-pump inhibitors were time-varying variables. RESULTS: The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow-up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies.

A novel nomogram for the prediction of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: High perforation risk hinders the widespread adoption of ESD for colorectal neoplasms. This study was performed to determine the risk factors of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced perforation and develop a predictive model. METHODS: A total of 1046 colorectal neoplasms in 1011 patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2011 to December 2021, in a single tertiary center as the derivation cohort. We identified independent risk factors for perforation using univariate analysis and multi-variate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed based on the logistic regression model and prospectively applied to 266 colorectal neoplasms as the validation cohort. The performance of the predictive model was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Independent pre-operative factors for colorectal ESD-induced perforation were tumor located in the left colon [odds ratio (OR) 2.39, P = 0.040], size ≥ 40 mm (OR 3.36, P < 0.001), ≥2/3 circumference (OR 7.55, P = 0.004), located across folds (OR 6.26, P < 0.001), and laterally spreading tumor (non-granular type, OR 2.34, P = 0.029; granular type, OR 2.46, P = 0.021). The nomogram model incorporating the pre-operative factors performed well in both the derivation and validation cohorts (areas under the curve of 0.750 and 0.806, respectively). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the clinical benefit of the nomogram was favorable. CONCLUSIONS: The novel nomogram, developed and prospectively validated, incorporating tumor size, location, and morphology can successfully predict perforation during ESD for colorectal neoplasms.

Comparing Healthcare Needs in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants With NEC and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) affect 6-8% of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. SIP has lower mortality than NEC, but with similar short-term morbidity in length of stay, growth failure, and supplemental oxygen requirements. Comparative long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes have not been clarified. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 59 North American neonatal units, regarding ELBW infants (401-1000 g or 22-27 weeks gestational age) born between 2011 and 2018 and evaluated again at 16-26 months corrected age. Outcomes were collected from infants with laparotomy-confirmed NEC, laparotomy-confirmed SIP, and those without NEC or SIP. The primary outcome was severe neurodevelopmental disability. Secondary outcomes were weight <10th percentile, medical readmission, post-discharge surgery and medical support at home. Adjusted risk ratios (ARR) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 13,673 ELBW infants, 6391 (47%) were followed including 93 of 232 (40%) with NEC and 100 of 235 (42%) with SIP. There were no statistically significant differences in adjusted risk of any outcomes when directly comparing NEC to SIP (ARR 2.35; 95% CI 0.89, 6.26). However, infants with NEC had greater risk of severe neurodevelopmental disability (ARR 1.43; 1.09-1.86), rehospitalization (ARR 1.46; 1.17-1.82), and post-discharge surgery (ARR 1.82; 1.48-2.23) compared to infants without NEC or SIP. Infants with SIP only had greater risk of post-discharge surgery (ARR 1.64; 1.34-2.00) compared to infants without NEC or SIP. CONCLUSIONS: ELBW infants with NEC had significantly increased risk of severe neurodevelopmental disability and post-discharge healthcare needs, consistent with prior literature. We now know infants with SIP also have increased healthcare needs. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Epidemiological, clinical and prognosis aspects of acute generalized peritonitis in South-Kivu Province: descriptive observational study of 278 cases.

Introduction: the aim was to determine epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic aspects of acute generalized peritonitis (AGP). Methods: we conducted an observational, cross-sectional and multicentre study over 2 years of 278 cases of acute generalized peritonitis operated in semi-urban and urban hospitals in South-Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Results: the population of this study was young with a mean age was 28.9 ± 16.1 years with extremes of 1.3 years to 80 years with a sex ratio M: F of 0.8. Peritonitis aetiology was dominated by intestinal perforation 132 cases (47.4%), the admission time in 65, 5% was more than 72 hours. Acute abdominal pain was the most reason for consultation in 93.2% of cases, 11.9% of patients were in hypovolemic shock. In 40.6%, the treatment of patients consisted in intestinal resection with terminal anastomosis, or ileostomy in 32.7%. About the outcomes, 32.4% of the patients had a surgical reoperation and 15.8% of the digestive fistulas were reported. The average duration of the hospitalization was 23.4 ± 20.3 days. Morbidity rate was 14.7%. Conclusion: the AGP remains one of the abdominal emergencies observed in different semi-urban and urban hospitals of the province of South-Kivu, causing some problems of medical and surgical management, starting from the delay of admission, the severity of the symptoms related to the etiology of the intestinal perforation. In all cases, AGP requires a well-executed resuscitation procedure and surgical technique to improve the prognosis and reduce mortality, which seems to be high in this study.

Risk factors for postoperative complications in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis and associated outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We aim to determine clinical risk factors for postoperative complications in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of preterm infants with surgical NEC or SIP to compare clinical factors between those with and without postoperative complications. RESULTS: 78/109 (71.5%) infants had any complication following surgical NEC. Adhesions (20/35, 57.1%) and wound infection (6/35, 17.1%) were the most common single surgical complications. Patients with a single surgical complication (35/66, 53%) were significantly less likely to be exposed to antenatal steroids, more frequently had a jejunostomy, needed a central line longer, and had a longer length of stay than those without any surgical complication. Infants with > 1 surgical complication (43/71, 60.5%) included mainly females, and had AKI more frequently at NEC onset, lower weight z-scores and lower weight for length z- scores at 36 weeks PMA than those without any complications.On multinomial logistic regression, antenatal steroids exposure (OR 0.23 [CI 0.06, 0.84]; p = 0.027) was independently associated with lower risk and jejunostomy 4.81 (1.29, 17.9) was independently associated with higher risk of developing a single complication. AKI following disease onset (OR 5.33 (1.38, 20.6), P = 0.015) was independently associated with > 1 complication in surgical NEC/SIP infants. CONCLUSION: Infants with postoperative complications following surgical NEC were more likely to be female, have additional morbidities, and demonstrate growth failure at 36 weeks PMA than those without surgical complications. There was no difference in mortality between those with and without surgical complications.

Inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis has been grabbing the headlines, it is known that the clinical presentation of peritonitis can also be caused by an underlying perforated carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of patients undergoing inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. METHODS: The PubMed database was systematically searched to include all studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were screened through titles and abstracts with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text screening. The primary endpoints of this meta-analysis were the rates of perforated colon cancer patients having undergone inadvertent laparoscopic lavage as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. This was expressed in pooled rate % and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eleven studies (three randomized, two prospective, six retrospective) totaling 642 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported how patients were screened for cancer and the number of patients who completed follow-up. The pooled cancer rate was 3.4% (0.9%, 5.8%) with low heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 34.02%) in eight studies. Cancer rates were 8.2% (0%, 3%) (Isquare2 = 58.2%) and 1.7% (0%, 4.5%) (Isquare2 = 0%) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Randomized trials reported a cancer rate of 7.2% (3.1%, 11.2%) with low among-study heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 0%) and a median delay to diagnosis of 2 (1.5-5) months. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that 7% of patients undergoing laparoscopic lavage for peritonitis had perforated colon cancer with a delay to diagnosis of up to 5 months.

Gastrointestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: A single center retrospective study in China.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants, characterized by its rapid onset, multiple complications, and critical condition, poses a significant risk of infant mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI) and explore the risk factors associated with gastrointestinal perforation in very low birth weight preterm infants. Additionally, we shared our surgical experiences in managing gastrointestinal perforation among extremely low birth weight infants. METHODS: The Department of Neonatology at Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital conducted a retrospective study on gastrointestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants (birth weight <1000 g) who were admitted between 2014 and 2021. After baseline analysis and comparing it with the control group, we identified the risk factors associated with gastrointestinal perforation in ELBWI by multiple logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the adverse effect of gastrointestinal perforation for survival in ELBW infants. Cox multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate hazard level of different variables for ELBW infants survival. RESULTS: Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA)(p = 0.043, OR = 2.779) and sepsis (p = 0.014, OR = 2.265) were significant risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants. The Cox proportional hazard model revealed that intraventricular hemorrhage (HR = 2.854, p＜0.001) Sepsis (HR = 1.645, p = 0.015) and gastrointestinal perforation (HR = 1.876, p = 0.008) had detrimental effects on the survival of extremely low birth weight infants; conversely, ibuprofen (HR = 0.304, p＜0.001) and blood transfusion (HR = 0.372, p＜0.001) are beneficial factors for their survival. The preoperative indicators of infection in infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) were significantly better than those in the necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal perforation poses a significant threat the survival of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, with hsPDA and sepsis serving as predisposing factors for gastrointestinal perforation. The gastrointestinal perforation caused by various diseases exhibits distinct clinical characteristics, necessitating tailored surgical approaches based on operative conditions.

Management of post-ERCP duodenal perforations: experience at Hospital Juárez de México.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic study in which the duodenum is observed laterally, and the bile duct is instrumented. There are several indications and complications in the procedure. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of duodenal perforations, using the Stapfer classification in the Hospital Juárez de Mexico over a period of 5 years, as well as the management implemented in such cases. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Hospital Juárez de Mexico of the Ministry of Health. All patients who underwent ERCP between January 1, 2017, to May 30, 2022 were included. RESULTS: 485 ERCP were performed in the study period. Incidence of 1.6% post-ERCP duodenal perforation. The average age of the subjects 56.37 years. In-hospital stay of post-ERCP perforations averaged 9.37 days. The time of the endoscopic study at the time of the surgical procedure is 10 h on average. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ERCP duodenal perforation is a complication that occurs with a low incidence, it tends to increase the number of days of in-hospital stay and increases morbimortality of patients; therefore, it is important to be always alert.

ANTECEDENTES: La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) es un estudio endoscópico en el cual se observa lateralmente el duodeno y se instrumenta la vía biliar. Existen diversas indicaciones y complicaciones en el procedimiento. OBJETIVO: Determinar la incidencia de perforaciones duodenales utilizando la clasificación Stapfer para ubicación anatómica en el Hospital Juárez de México en un periodo de 5 años, así como el manejo implementado en dichos casos. MÉTODO: El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Juárez de México de la Secretaría de Salud. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a CPRE entre el 1 de enero de 2017 y el 30 de mayo de 2022. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 485 CPRE en el periodo de estudio. Hubo una incidencia del 1.6% de perforación duodenal post-CPRE. El promedio de edad de los sujetos fue de 56.37 años. La estancia hospitalaria de los pacientes con perforación post-CPRE fue en promedio de 9.37 días. El tiempo del estudio endoscópico al momento de realizar el procedimiento quirúrgico fue de 10 h en promedio. CONCLUSIONES: La perforación duodenal post-CPRE es una complicación que ocurre con una baja incidencia, suele aumentar los días de estancia intrahospitalaria y aumenta la morbimortalidad de los pacientes, y por ello es importante estar siempre alerta.

Early results of conservative and surgical approach in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Perforations Single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± endoscopic sphincterotomy, and after perforation (ERCP-P), which is a common method used for the diagnosis in the past and treatment today in hepatopancreatobiliary cases, is a rare complication with high mortality. While surgery has been at the forefront in perforations after ERCP in previous years, conservative treatment is widely accepted today, except for some special conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of ERCP-P in a hepatobiliary center, the outcome of the treatment modalities applied, and the risk factors for mortality due to perforations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients hospitalized in our clinic with the diagnosis of ERCP-P were retrospectively analyzed. Age, gender, ERCP indication, method of treatment applied, time between ERCP-P diagnosis and treatment, injury class, length of stay (LOS) and early results of the patients were examined. RESULTS: 45 patients were hospitalized in our clinic upon the development of ERCP-P between the years of 2006 and 2022. 37 of these patients underwent conservative and 8 patients underwent surgical treatment. When the perforation types were examined, Stapfer Type 1 was found in 4 patients, Type II in 6 patients, Type III in 3 patients and Type IV ERCP-P in 32 patients (71.1%). LOS was longer in the surgical group than in the conservative treatment group (p=0.040). Mortality was observed in 15.56% of patients. 57.1% of these patients were in the surgical group. In the multivariate analysis, the time between diagnosis and treatment of ERCP-P, which is the only factor affecting mortality, was found. The risk of death was found to be 30.61 times higher in patients with a time elapsed between ERCP-P diagnosis and treatment exceeding 24 hours compared to patients with a time elapsed ≤24 hours (p=0.030). DISCUSSION: In our study, it was observed that the prognosis of the patients in the surgical group was poor and the length of stay was significantly longer. At the same time, the only effective factor on mortality is the time between ERCPP diagnosis and treatment. KEY WORDS: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography, Perforation, R Factors.

Incidence of colonoscopy-related perforation and risk factors for poor outcomes: 3-year results from a prospective, multicenter registry (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Perforation is a life-threatening adverse event of colonoscopy that often requires hospitalization and surgery. We aimed to prospectively assess the incidence of colonoscopy-related perforation in a multicenter registry and to analyze the clinical factors associated with poor clinical outcomes. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at six tertiary referral hospitals between 2017 and 2020, and included patients with colonic perforation after colonoscopy. Poor clinical outcomes were defined as mortality, surgery, and prolonged hospitalization (> 13 days). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with poor clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 84,673 patients undergoing colonoscopy, 56 had colon perforation (0.66/1000, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.86). Perforation occurred in 12 of 63,602 diagnostic colonoscopies (0.19/1000, 95% CI 0.11-0.33) and 44 of 21,071 therapeutic colonoscopies (2.09/1000, 95% CI 1.55-2.81). Of these, 15 (26.8%) patients underwent surgery, and 25 (44.6%) patients had a prolonged hospital stay. One patient (1.8%) died after perforation from a diagnostic colonoscopy. In the multivariate analysis, diagnostic colonoscopy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 196.43, p = 0.025) and abdominal rebound tenderness (aOR 17.82, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for surgical treatment. The location of the sigmoid colon (aOR 18.57, p = 0.048), delayed recognition (aOR 187.71, p = 0.008), and abdominal tenderness (aOR 63.20, p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrated that the incidence of colonoscopy-related perforation was 0.66/1000. The incidence rate was higher in therapeutic colonoscopy, whereas the risk for undergoing surgery was higher in patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Colonoscopy indication (diagnostic vs. therapeutic), physical signs, the location of the sigmoid perforation, and delayed recognition were independent risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in colonoscopy-related perforation.

Decreased Incidence of Hirschsprung-Associated Enterocolitis During COVID-19 Across United States Children's Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic provided a natural experiment to study the effect of social distancing on the risk of developing Hirschsprung's Associated Enterocolitis (HAEC). METHODS: Using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS), a retrospective cohort study of children (<18 years) with Hirschsprung's Disease (HSCR) across 47 United States children's hospitals was performed. The primary outcome was HAEC admissions per 10,000 patient-days. The exposure (COVID-19) was defined as April 2020-December 2021. The unexposed (historical control) period was April 2018-December 2019. Secondary outcomes included sepsis, bowel perforation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Overall, we included 5707 patients with HSCR during the study period. There were 984 and 834 HAEC admissions during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively (2.6 vs. 1.9 HAEC admissions per 10,000 patient-days, incident rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.74 [0.67, 0.81], p < 0.001). Compared to pre-pandemic, those with HAEC during the pandemic were younger (median [IQR]: 566 [162, 1430] days pandemic vs. 746 [259, 1609] days pre-pandemic, p < 0.001) and more likely to live in the lowest quartile of median household income zip codes (24% pandemic vs. 19% pre-pandemic, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in rates of sepsis (6.1% pandemic vs. 6.1% pre-pandemic, p > 0.9), bowel perforation (1.3% pandemic vs. 1.2% pre-pandemic, p = 0.8), ICU admissions (9.6% pandemic vs. 12% pre-pandemic, p = 0.2), mortality (0.5% pandemic vs. 0.6% pre-pandemic, p = 0.8), or length of stay (median [interquartile range]: 4 [(Pastor et al., 2009; Gosain and Brinkman, 2015) 2,112,11 days pandemic vs. 5 [(Pastor et al., 2009; Tang et al., 2020) 2,102,10 days pre-pandemic, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with significantly decreased incidence of HAEC admissions across US children's hospitals. Possible etiologies such as social distancing should be explored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Association between quality control and outcomes of septic shock caused by intestinal perforation in China: a cross-sectional study.

Septic shock, largely caused by intestinal perforation, is a common critical disease in intensive care unit (ICU). For hospitals and health systems, a performance improvement program for sepsis was strong recommended in guidelines. Numerous studies have shown that improved quality control improves outcomes in patients with septic shock. Nevertheless, association between quality control and outcomes of septic shock caused by intestinal perforation are not fully revealed. Thus we designed this study to investigate effects of quality control on septic shock caused by intestinal perforation in China. This was a multicenter observational study. A total of 463 hospitals were enrolled in this survey, led by the China National Critical Care Quality Control Center (China-NCCQC) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. In this study, the indicators of quality control included the proportion of ICU patient bed occupancy to total inpatient bed occupancy, the proportion of ICU patients with APACHE II score ≥ 15, and the microbiology detection rate before antibiotic use. The outcome indicators included hospital stays, hospitalization costs, complications, and mortality. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyse the association between quality control and septic shock caused by intestinal perforation. The proportion of ICU patient bed occupancy to total inpatient bed occupancy is positively correlated with hospital stays, incidence of complications (ARDS, AKI) and costs in septic shock caused by intestinal perforation (p < 0.05). The proportion of ICU patients with APACHE II score ≥ 15 was not associated with hospital stays and incidence of ARDS and AKI (p < 0.05). Increasing of the proportion of ICU patients with APACHE II score ≥ 15 decreased the costs of patients with septic shock caused by intestinal perforation (p < 0.05). The microbiology detection rate before antibiotic use was not associated with hospital stays, incidence of AKI and costs of patients with septic shock caused by intestinal perforation (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, the increase of microbiology detection rate before antibiotic use increased the incidence of ARDS in patients with septic shock caused by intestinal perforation (p < 0.05). The above three indicators of quality control were not associated with mortality of the patients with septic shock caused by intestinal perforation. On the one hand, the number of ICU patients admitted should be controlled to reduce the proportion of ICU patients out of total inpatient bed occupancy. On the other hand, intensive care unit admission of severe patients (patients with APACHE II score ≥ 15) should be encouraged to improve the proportion of patients with APACHE II score ≥ 15 in the ICU, so that ICU can focus more on the treatment of severe patients and promote the professionalization of severe patient management. It is not advisable to collect sputum specimens too frequently for patients without pneumonia.

Characteristics and endoscopic treatment of interventional and non-interventional iatrogenic colorectal perforations in centers with high endoscopic expertise: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic colorectal perforation is a rare event with a relevant mortality and the need for surgical therapy in around ¾ of cases. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study iatrogenic colorectal perforations from 2004 to 2021 were analyzed. Primary outcome parameters were incidence and clinical success of 1st line endoscopic treatment. Comparative analysis of interventional and non-interventional perforations was performed and predictors for clinical success of endoscopic therapy were identified. RESULTS: From 103,570 colonoscopies 213 (0.2%) iatrogenic perforations were identified. 68.4% were interventional (80 during polypectomy/EMR, 54 during ESD and 11 for other reasons) and 31.6% non-interventional perforations (39 by the tip, 19 by the shaft, 7 by inversion, two by biopsy and one by distension). Incidence of 1st line endoscopic therapy was 61.0% and clinical success 81.5%. Other non-surgical therapies were conducted in 8.9% with clinical success in 94.7% of cases. In interventional perforations both incidence and clinical success of 1st line endoscopic therapy were significantly higher compared to non-interventional perforations [71.7% vs. 38.2% (p < 0.01) resp. 86.5% vs. 61.5% (p < 0.01)]. Mortality was 2.3% and significantly lower in the group of interventional perforations (0.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.037). Multivariable analysis revealed perforation size < 5 mm as only independent predictor for clinical success of 1st line endoscopic treatment [OR 14.85 (1.57-140.69), p = 0.019]. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy is treatment of choice in the majority of iatrogenic colorectal perforations. In case of interventional perforations it is highly effective but only a minority of non-interventional perforations are good candidates for endoscopic treatment.

Association between gastrointestinal perforation and patent ductus arteriosus in extremely-low-birth-weight infants: a retrospective study of our decade-long experience.

PURPOSE: Management of persistently patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in extremely low-birth-weight infants (ELBWIs) requires attention due to the risk of tissue hypoperfusion. We investigated the association between PDA and gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review from 2012 to 2021. Preterm (≤ 32 weeks) ELBWIs with PDA after birth who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), focal intestinal perforation (FIP), and idiopathic gastric perforation were included; ELBWIs with congenital heart disease were excluded. Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests with Yates; correction, and Student's t test. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five preterm ELBWIs were analyzed, including 20 with NEC, 22 with FIP, and 1 with gastric perforation. In NEC and FIP, the ductus arteriosus remained open in 40% (4/10) and 63.6% (14/22) of cases, respectively, and cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor treatment showed poor efficacy (p = 0.492 and 0.240). The incidence of perforation in NEC (4/9 vs. 6/11, p = 0.653), mortality in NEC (3/4 vs. 3/6, p = 0.895) and FIP (6/14 vs. 3/8, p = 0.838) did not differ according to whether the PDA persisted or resolved. CONCLUSION: The presentation of PDA did not affect the mortality or morbidity of ELBWIs. However, it is essential to consider the possibility of gastrointestinal perforation due to decreased organ blood flow caused by ductal steal.