Quality assessment of oral antimalarial and antiretroviral medicines used by public health systems in Sahel countries.

Malaria and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infections are among the top 10 causes of death in low income countries. Furthermore, many medicines used in these treatment areas are substandard, which contributes to the high death rate. Using a monitoring system to identify substandard and falsified medicines, the study aims to evaluate the quality of antimalarial and antiretroviral medicines in Sahel countries, assessing site conditions, compliance of medicines with pharmacopoeia tests, formulation equivalence with a reference medicine, and the influence of climate on quality attributes. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography methods for eight active pharmaceutical ingredients were validated following the International Conference for Harmonization guideline for its detection and quantification. Quality control consists of visual inspections to detect any misinformation or imperfections and pharmacopeial testing to determine the quality of pharmaceutical products. Medicines which complied with uniformity dosage units and dissolution tests were stored under accelerated conditions for 6 months. Artemether/Lumefantrine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations failed uniformity dosage units and disintegration tests respectively, detecting a total of 28.6% substandard medicines. After 6 months stored under accelerated conditions (40 °C // 75% relative humidity) simulating climatic conditions in Sahel countries, some medicines failed pharmacopeia tests. It demonstrated the influence of these two factors in their quality attributes. This study emphasizes the need of certified quality control laboratories as well as the need for regulatory systems to maintain standards in pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution in these countries, especially when medicines are transported to rural areas where these climatic conditions are harsher.

Favipiravir, remdesivir, and lopinavir: metabolites, degradation products and their analytical methods.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic all over the world. Several studies have suggested that antiviral drugs such as favipiravir (FAV), remdesivir (RDV), and lopinavir (LPV) may potentially prevent the spread of the virus in the host cells and person-to-person transmission. Simultaneously with the widespread use of these drugs, their stability and action mechanism studies have also attracted the attention of many researchers. This review focuses on the action mechanism, metabolites and degradation products of these antiviral drugs (FAV, RDV and LPV) and demonstrates various methods for their quantification and discrimination in the different biological samples. Herein, the instrumental methods for analysis of the main form of drugs or their metabolite and degradation products are classified into two types: optical and chromatography methods which the last one in combination with various detectors provides a powerful method for routine and stability analyses. Some representative studies are reported in this review and the details of them are carefully explained. It is hoped that this review will be a good guideline study and provide a better understanding of these drugs from the aspects investigated in this study.

Physicochemical interaction of rifampicin and ritonavir-lopinavir solid dispersion: an in-vitro and ex-vivo investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the in-situ physicochemical interaction of Rifampicin and Ritonavir - Lopinavir Solid dispersion administered for the treatment of comorbid conditions i.e. Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. METHODS: pH-shift dissolution of Rifampicin (RIF) in presence of Ritonavir-Lopinavir solid dispersion (RL-SD) was carried out in USP phosphate buffer 6.8 and FaSSIF. Equilibrium and amorphous solubility were determined for the drugs. Pure drugs, their physical mixtures, and pH-shifted co-precipitated samples were characterized using DSC, PXRD, and FTIR. Fluorescence spectroscopy was used to investigate drug-rich and drug-lean phases. In-vitro and ex-vivo flux studies were also carried out. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences in the solubility and dissolution profiles of RTV and LOP in the presence of RIF, while RIF profile remained unchanged. Amorphicity, intermolecular interaction and aggregate formation in pH-shifted samples were revealed in DSC, XRD and FTIR analysis. Fluorescence spectroscopy confirmed the formation of drug-rich phase upon pH-shift. In-vitro and ex-vivo flux studies revealed significant reduction in the flux of all the drugs when studied in presence of second drug. CONCLUSION: RIF, RTV and LOP in presence of each other on pH-shift, results in co-precipitation in the amorphous form (miscible) which leads to reduction in the highest attainable degree of supersaturation. This reduction corresponds to the mole fraction of the RIF, RTV and LOP within the studied system. These findings suggest that the concomitant administration of these drugs may lead to physicochemical interactions and possible ineffective therapy.

Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Model Validated to Enable Predictions Of Multiple Drugs in a Long-acting Drug-combination Nano-Particles (DcNP): Confirmation with 3 HIV Drugs, Lopinavir, Ritonavir, and Tenofovir in DcNP Products.

Drug-Combination Nanoparticles (DcNP) are a novel drug delivery system designed for synchronized delivery of multiple drugs in a single, long-acting, and targeted dose. Unlike depot formulations, slowly releasing drug at the injection site into the blood, DcNP allows multiple-drug-in-combination to collectively distribute from the injection site into the lymphatic system. Two distinct classes of long-acting injectables products are proposed based on pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Class I involves sustained release at the injection site. Class II involves a drug-carrier complex composed of lopinavir, ritonavir, and tenofovir uptake and retention in the lymphatic system before systemic access as a part of the PBPK model validation. For clinical development, Class II long-acting drug-combination products, we leverage data from 3 nonhuman primate studies consisting of nine PK datasets: Study 1, varying fixed-dose ratios; Study 2, short multiple dosing with kinetic tails; Study 3, long multiple dosing (chronic). PBPK validation criteria were established to validate each scenario for all drugs. The models passed validation in 8 of 9 cases, specifically to predict Study 1 and 2, including PK tails, with ritonavir and tenofovir, fully passing Study 3 as well. PBPK model for lopinavir in Study 3 did not pass the validation due to an observable time-varying and delayed drug accumulation, which likely was due to ritonavir's CYP3A inhibitory effect building up during multiple dosing that triggered a mechanism-based drug-drug interaction (DDI). Subsequently, the final model enables us to account for this DDI scenario.

Factors associated with the acceptability of Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations among children living with HIV/AIDS attending care and treatment clinics in Mbeya and Mwanza, Tanzania.

INTRODUCTION: Children living with chronic illnesses are offered formulations based on manufacturer and distributor research. The aim of this study is to better understand the perspectives of children and their caregivers in accepting Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) formulations. METHODS: 362 participants were recruited from two pediatric HIV/AIDS clinics in Mbeya and Mwanza, Tanzania, from December 2021 to May 2022. A translated questionnaire was piloted and validated at both clinics, followed by the implementation of a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: 169 participants (47.1%) reported general difficulties in swallowing, regardless of formulation, while 34.3% and 38.5% reported vomiting tablets and syrups, respectively. Statistical significance is shown to support that children can swallow medications if they can eat stiffened porridge (Ugali). This correlated with the lower incidence of younger children being able to swallow compared to older children (above six years of age). Children older than six years preferred taking tablets (independent of daily dosage) better than other formulations. Significantly, older children who attend school were associated with high odds of swallowing medicine (AOR = 3.06, 95%CI; 1.32-7.05); however, age was not found to be statistically related to ease of administration for Lopinavir/Ritonavir in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/Ritonavir tablets remain the most accepted formulation among children and adolescents with HIV/AIDS. This study highlights the impact of various factors affecting the acceptability of pediatric formulation, suggesting that children younger than six years, unable to eat Ugali and not attending schools may be most vulnerable regarding their ability to accept Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations. Further studies are needed to assess the acceptability of other medications in chronically ill children.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Pediatric Lopinavir/Ritonavir Oral Pellets in Children Living with HIV in Africa.

Antiretroviral therapy for children living with HIV (CLHIV) under 3 years of age commonly includes lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). However, the original liquid LPV/r formulation has taste and cold storage difficulties. To address these challenges, LPV/r oral pellets have been developed. These pellets can be mixed with milk or food for administration and do not require refrigeration. We developed the population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and assessed drug exposure of LPV/r oral pellets administered twice daily to CLHIV per World Health Organization (WHO) weight bands. The PK analysis included Kenyan and Ugandan children participating in the LIVING studies (NCT02346487) receiving LPV/r pellets (40/10 mg) and ABC/3TC (60/30 mg) dispersible tablets. Population PK models were developed for lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) to evaluate the impact of RTV on the oral clearance (CL/F) of LPV. The data obtained from the study were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Data from 514 children, comprising a total of 2,998 plasma concentrations of LPV/r were included in the analysis. The LPV and RTV concentrations were accurately represented by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption (incorporating a lag-time) and elimination. Body weight influenced LPV and RTV PK parameters. The impact of RTV concentrations on the CL/F of LPV was characterized using a maximum effect model. Simulation-predicted target LPV exposures were achieved in children with this pellet formulation across the WHO weight bands. The LPV/r pellets dosed in accordance with WHO weight bands provide adequate LPV exposures in Kenyan and Ugandan children weighing 3.0 to 24.9 kg.

Paediatric abacavir-lamivudine fixed-dose dispersible tablets and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir granules in neonates exposed to HIV (PETITE study): an open-label, two-stage, single-arm, phase 1/2, pharmacokinetic and safety trial.

BACKGROUND: Existing solid antiretroviral fixed-dose combination formulations are preferred over liquid formulations in children, but their suitability for neonates is unknown. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of paediatric abacavir-lamivudine fixed-dose dispersible tablets and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir granules in neonates. METHODS: In this open-label, two-stage, single-arm, phase 1/2, pharmacokinetic and safety trial, generic abacavir- lamivudine (120:60 mg) double-scored dispersible tablets and lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (40:10 mg) granules were studied. Neonates exposed to HIV (≥37 weeks gestational age) of no more than 3 days of age with birthweights of 2000-4000 g were identified through routine care in a tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. In stage 1, the pharmacokinetics and safety of two single doses were assessed to select the multidose strategy for stage 2. Neonates received a single dose of abacavir-lamivudine (30:15 mg, a quarter of a tablet) and lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (40:10 mg - one sachet) orally between 3 days and 14 days of age, and a second dose of a quarter tablet of abacavir-lamivudine and lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (80:20 mg, two sachets) 10-14 days later in stage 1. The multidose strategy selected in stage 2 was a quarter of the abacavir-lamivudine (30:15 mg) fixed-dose dispersible tablet once per day and two sachets of the lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (80:20 mg) granules twice per day from birth to age 28 days. In both stages two intensive pharmacokinetic visits were done, one at less than 14 days of life (pharmacokinetics 1) and another 10-14 days later (pharmacokinetics 2). Safety visits were done 1-2 weeks after each pharmacokinetic visit. Primary objectives were to assess pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir, lamivudine, and lopinavir. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the concentration time curve (AUC), maximum concentration, and concentration at end of dosing interval in all participants with at least one evaluable pharmacokinetic visit. Safety endpoints included grade 3 or worse adverse events, and grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events, occurring between study drug initiation and end of study. This completed trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202007806554538). FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2021, and Aug 18, 2022, 24 neonates were enrolled into the trial and received study drugs. Eight neonates completed stage 1, meeting interim pharmacokinetic and safety criteria. In stage 2, 16 neonates received study drugs. Geometric mean abacavir and lamivudine exposures (AUC0-24) were higher at 6-14 days (51·7 mg × h/L for abacavir and 17·2 mg × h/L for lamivudine) than at 19-24 days of age (25·0 mg × h/L and 11·3 mg × h/L), whereas they were similar for lopinavir over this period (AUC 0-12 58·5 mg × h/L vs 46·4 mg × h/L). Abacavir geometric mean AUC0-24 crossed the upper reference range at pharmacokinetics 1, but rapidly decreased. Lamivudine and lopinavir AUC0-tau were within range. No grade 2 or worse adverse events were related to study drugs. One neonate had a grade 1 prolonged corrected QT interval using the Fridericia method that spontaneously resolved. INTERPRETATION: Abacavir-lamivudine dispersible tablets and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir granules in neonates were safe and provided drug exposures similar to those in young infants. Although further safety data are needed, this regimen presents a new option for HIV prevention and treatment from birth. Accelerating neonatal pharmacokinetic studies of novel antiretroviral therapies is essential for neonates to also benefit from state-of-the-art treatments. FUNDING: Unitaid.

In Vitro and In Vivo testing of 3D-Printed Amorphous Lopinavir Printlets by Selective Laser Sinitering: Improved Bioavailability of a Poorly Soluble Drug.

The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of formulation parameters on the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of amorphous printlets of lopinavir (LPV) manufactured by selective laser sintering 3D printing method (SLS). The formulation variables investigated were disintegrants (magnesium aluminum silicate at 5-10%, microcrystalline cellulose at 10-20%) and the polymer (Kollicoat® IR at 42-57%), while keeping printing parameters constant. Differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, and Fourier-transform infrared analysis confirmed the transformation of the crystalline drug into an amorphous form. A direct correlation was found between the disintegrant concentration and dissolution. The dissolved drug ranged from 71.1 ± 5.7% to 99.3 ± 2.7% within 120 min. A comparative PK study in rabbits showed significant differences in the rate and extent of absorption between printlets and compressed tablets. The values for Tmax, Cmax, and AUC were 4 times faster, and 2.5 and 1.7 times higher in the printlets compared to the compressed tablets, respectively. In conclusion, the SLS printing method can be used to create an amorphous delivery system through a single continuous process.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Oral Solution in Preterm and Term Infants Starting Before 3 Months of Age.

BACKGROUND: Study of liquid lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in young infants has been limited by concerns for its safety in neonates. METHODS: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1106 was a phase IV, prospective, trial evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral medications administered according to local guidelines to South African preterm and term infants <3 months of age. Safety evaluation through 24-week follow-up included clinical, cardiac and laboratory assessments. Pharmacokinetic data from P1106 were combined with data from International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network studies P1030 and P1083 in a population pharmacokinetics model used to simulate LPV exposures with a weight-band dosing regimen in infants through age 6 months. RESULTS: Safety and pharmacokinetics results were similar in 13/28 (46%) infants initiating LPV/r <42 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and in those starting ≥42 weeks PMA. LPV/r was started at a median (range) age of 47 (13-121) days. No grade 3 or higher adverse events were considered treatment related. Modeling and simulation predicted that for infants with gestational age ≥27 weeks who receive the weight-band dosing regimen, 82.6% will achieve LPV trough concentration above the target trough concentration of 1.0 µg/mL and 56.6% would exceed the observed adult lower limit of LPV exposure of 55.9 µg·h/mL through age 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: LPV/r oral solution was safely initiated in a relatively small sample size of infants ≥34 weeks PMA and >2 weeks of life. No serious drug-related safety signal was observed; however, adrenal function assessments were not performed. Weight-band dosing regimen in infants with gestational age ≥27 weeks is predicted to result in LPV exposures equivalent to those observed in other pediatric studies.

Clinical outcomes with second-line dolutegravir in people with virological failure on first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG) is recommended for second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after virological failure on first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens in people living with HIV in low-income and middle-income countries. We compared the effectiveness of DTG versus the previously recommended ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) regimen for second-line treatment in South Africa. METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we used routinely collected, de-identified data from 59 primary health-care facilities in eThekwini Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We included people living with HIV aged 15 years or older with virological failure (defined as two consecutive viral loads of ≥1000 copies per mL at least 56 days apart) on first-line NNRTI-based ART containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and who switched to second-line ART. Our primary outcomes were retention in care and viral suppression (<50 copies per mL) at 12 months after starting second-line treatment. We used modified Poisson regression models to compare these outcomes between second-line regimens (zidovudine [AZT]/emtricitabine or lamivudine [XTC]/DTG; TDF/XTC/DTG; and AZT/XTC/LPV/r). FINDINGS: We included 1214 participants in our study, of whom 729 (60%) were female and 485 (40%) were male, and whose median age was 36 years (IQR 30-42). 689 (57%) were switched to AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 217 (18%) to AZT/XTC/DTG, and 308 (25%) to TDF/XTC/DTG. Compared with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (75%), retention in care was higher with AZT/XTC/DTG (86%, adjusted risk ratio [aRR]=1·14, 95% CI 1·03-1·27; adjusted risk difference [aRD]=10·89%, 95% CI 2·01 to 19·78) but similar with TDF/XTC/DTG (77%, aRR=1·01, 0·94-1·10; aRD=1·04%, -5·03 to 7·12). Observed retention in care was lower with TDF/XTC/DTG than with AZT/XTC/DTG, although in multivariable analysis evidence for a difference was weak (aRR=0·89, 0·78-1·01, p=0·060; aRD=-9·85%, -20·33 to 0·63, p=0·066). Of 799 participants who were retained in care with a 12-month viral load test done, viral suppression was higher with AZT/XTC/DTG (59%; aRR=1·25, 1·06-1·47; aRD=11·57%, 2·37 to 20·76) and higher with TDF/XTC/DTG (61%; aRR=1·30, 1·14-1·48; aRD=14·16%, 7·14 to 21·18) than with AZT/XTC/LPV/r (47%). INTERPRETATION: These findings from routine care support further implementation of WHO's recommendation to use DTG instead of LPV/r in people living with HIV who experience virological failure while receiving first-line NNRTI-based ART. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the isiZulu translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A detailed characterization of drug resistance during darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy highlights a high barrier to the emergence of resistance mutations in protease but identifies alternative pathways of resistance.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir has yielded variable outcomes and is not recommended. Trial samples offer valuable opportunities for detailed studies. We analysed samples from a 48 week trial in Cameroon to obtain a detailed characterization of drug resistance. METHODS: Following failure of NNRTI-based therapy and virological suppression on PI-based therapy, participants were randomized to ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n = 81) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine +ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 39). At study entry, PBMC-derived HIV-1 DNA underwent bulk Protease and Reverse Transcriptase (RT) sequencing. At virological rebound (confirmed or last available HIV-1 RNA ≥ 60 copies/mL), plasma HIV-1 RNA underwent ultradeep Protease and RT sequencing and bulk Gag-Protease sequencing. The site-directed mutant T375A (p2/p7) was characterized phenotypically using a single-cycle assay. RESULTS: NRTI and NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were detected in 52/90 (57.8%) and 53/90 (58.9%) HIV-1 DNA samples, respectively. Prevalence in rebound HIV-1 RNA (ritonavir-boosted darunavir, n = 21; ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, n = 2) was 9/23 (39.1%) and 10/23 (43.5%), respectively, with most RAMs detected at frequencies ≥15%. The resistance patterns of paired HIV-1 DNA and RNA sequences were partially consistent. No darunavir RAMs were found. Among eight participants experiencing virological rebound on ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n = 12 samples), all had Gag mutations associated with PI exposure, including T375N, T375A (p2/p7), K436R (p7/p1) and substitutions in p17, p24, p2 and p6. T375A conferred 10-fold darunavir resistance and increased replication capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the high resistance barrier of ritonavir-boosted darunavir while identifying alternative pathways of resistance through Gag substitutions. During virological suppression, resistance patterns in HIV-1 DNA reflect treatment history, but due to technical and biological considerations, cautious interpretation is warranted.

Modern antiretroviral regimens in pregnant women: virologic outcomes and durability.

OBJECTIVES: Data are lacking on the virologic efficacy and durability of modern antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens during pregnancy. We compared virologic outcomes at delivery among women receiving dolutegravir versus other ART and the rate of change of the initial pregnancy regimen. DESIGN: Single-site retrospective cohort between 2009 and 2019. METHODS: We used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to model the relationship between the maternal ART anchor and the proportion of women with a detectable viral load (greater than or equal to 20 HIV RNA copies/mL of plasma) closest to delivery (suboptimal virologic control) and with a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester. We also compared changes in ART during pregnancy. RESULTS: We evaluated 230 pregnancies in 173 mothers. Rates of optimal virologic control at delivery did not significantly differ in mothers who received dolutegravir (93.1%), rilpivirine (92.1%), boosted darunavir (82.6%), or efavirenz (76.9%) but were significantly lower among mothers receiving atazanavir (49.0%) or lopinavir (40.9%). The odds of having a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester was also higher for atazanavir and lopinavir. Raltegravir, elvitegravir, or bictegravir were used in less than 10 mothers at delivery, which precluded statistical analyses. The frequency of change in ART was significantly higher in mothers who initially received elvitegravir (68%) or efavirenz (47%) than dolutegravir (18%). CONCLUSION: Dolutegravir-containing, rilpivirine-containing, and boosted darunavir-containing regimens conferred excellent virologic control in pregnancy. Atazanavir and lopinavir, elvitegravir, and efavirenz were associated with either high rates of virologic failure or regimen change during pregnancy.

Prevalence and risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Ethiopia: describing an emerging outbreak in HIV clinics of the sub-Saharan Africa - a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: HIV-induced chronic inflammation, immune activation and combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) are linked with adverse metabolic changes known to cause cardiovascular adversities. This study evaluates the prevalence of lipodystrophy, and metabolic syndrome (MetS), and analyses risk factors in HIV-infected Ethiopians taking cART. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted at tertiary-level hospitals. Eligible participants attending the HIV clinics were enrolled. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical, HIV treatment variables, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose level, risk factors and components of MetS, also lipodystrophy, were studied. Data were analysed by SPSS statistical package V.25 with descriptive and analytical statistics. For multivariable analysis of risk factors, a logistic regression model was used. Results were presented in frequency and percentages, mean±SD, or median+IQR. Statistical significance was taken as p<0.05. RESULTS: Among 518 studied participants, two-thirds were females, and the mean age of the study population was 45 years (SD=11). The mean duration of cART was 10 years (SD=4). Median CD4 count was 460 cells/mm3. The prevalence of MetS according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (2005) criteria was 37.6%. In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for MetS were age >45 years (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4), female sex (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8), body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/m2 (aHR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.1), efavirenz-based cART (aHR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.8) and lopinavir/ritonavir-based cART (aHR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 13.3). The prevalence of lipodystrophy was 23.6%. Prior exposure to a stavudine-containing regimen was independently associated with lipodystrophy (aHR 3.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.1). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed 38% of the participants had MetS indicating considerable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks. Independent risk factors for MetS were BMI≥25 kg/m2, efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir-based cART, female sex and age ≥45 years. In addition to prevention, CVD risk stratification and management will reduce morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection.

A Comparative Study of Antiretroviral (Lopinavir/Ritonavir) and Remdesivir Used in the Pandemic in Iraq on the Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which emerged in December 2019, has infected millions worldwide and caused many deaths. Due to its high mortality rate, several studies assessed the effectiveness of different drugs against COVID-19, mainly in reducing the hospitalization rate among the elderly and compromised patients. Lopinavir-ritonavir combination and remdesivir were among the medications used to treat COVID-19. Due to considerable differences in the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the two treatments, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between COVID-19 patients treated with antiretrovirals (lopinavir-ritonavir) and remdesivir. A total of 33 patients on lopinavir-ritonavir and 35 on remdesivir were selected for this study. A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted based on demographic characteristics, hospital stay, laboratory parameters of C-reactive protein (CRP) and plasma blood oxygen saturation (SPO2), clinical treatment, and a clinical outcome assessment extracted from hospital archive data. Both treatments improved patient outcomes, yet there was a significant difference between lopinavir-ritonavir and remdesivir groups in platelet count, CRP, SPO2, and monocyte results, with remdesivir showing better clinical outcomes. No significant difference was reported in white blood cells, lymphopenia, and lactate dehydrogenase between the two treatments. It is still necessary to conduct further research to determine how effective the two treatments are in treating severe COVID-19 cases due to the limited number of available studies and the inconsistency in research methods and measurements.

Evaluating pediatric tuberculosis dosing guidelines: A model-based individual data pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization (WHO) pediatric tuberculosis dosing guidelines lead to suboptimal drug exposures. Identifying factors altering the exposure of these drugs in children is essential for dose optimization. Pediatric pharmacokinetic studies are usually small, leading to high variability and uncertainty in pharmacokinetic results between studies. We pooled data from large pharmacokinetic studies to identify key covariates influencing drug exposure to optimize tuberculosis dosing in children. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to characterize the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide, and investigated the association of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), antiretroviral therapy (ART), drug formulation, age, and body size with their pharmacokinetics. Data from 387 children from South Africa, Zambia, Malawi, and India were available for analysis; 47% were female and 39% living with HIV (95% on ART). Median (range) age was 2.2 (0.2 to 15.0) years and weight 10.9 (3.2 to 59.3) kg. Body size (allometry) was used to scale clearance and volume of distribution of all 3 drugs. Age affected the bioavailability of rifampicin and isoniazid; at birth, children had 48.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) [36.0%, 61.8%]; p < 0.001) and 64.5% (95% CI [52.1%, 78.9%]; p < 0.001) of adult rifampicin and isoniazid bioavailability, respectively, and reached full adult bioavailability after 2 years of age for both drugs. Age also affected the clearance of all drugs (maturation), children reached 50% adult drug clearing capacity at around 3 months after birth and neared full maturation around 3 years of age. While HIV per se did not affect the pharmacokinetics of first-line tuberculosis drugs, rifampicin clearance was 22% lower (95% CI [13%, 28%]; p < 0.001) and pyrazinamide clearance was 49% higher (95% CI [39%, 57%]; p < 0.001) in children on lopinavir/ritonavir; isoniazid bioavailability was reduced by 39% (95% CI [32%, 45%]; p < 0.001) when simultaneously coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir and was 37% lower (95% CI [22%, 52%]; p < 0.001) in children on efavirenz. Simulations of 2010 WHO-recommended pediatric tuberculosis doses revealed that, compared to adult values, rifampicin exposures are lower in most children, except those younger than 3 months, who experience relatively higher exposure for all drugs, due to immature clearance. Increasing the rifampicin doses in children older than 3 months by 75 mg for children weighing <25 kg and 150 mg for children weighing >25 kg could improve rifampicin exposures. Our analysis was limited by the differences in availability of covariates among the pooled studies. CONCLUSIONS: Children older than 3 months have lower rifampicin exposures than adults and increasing their dose by 75 or 150 mg could improve therapy. Altered exposures in children with HIV is most likely caused by concomitant ART and not HIV per se. The importance of the drug-drug interactions with lopinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz should be evaluated further and considered in future dosing guidance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration numbers; NCT02348177, NCT01637558, ISRCTN63579542.

Genetic variations of CYP3A4 on the metabolism of itraconazole in vitro.

Itraconazole is a triazole anti-infective drug that has been proven to prevent and treat a variety of fungal and viral infections and has been considered to be a potential therapeutic remedy for COVID-19 treatment. In this study, we aimed to completely evaluate the impacts of Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) variant proteins and drug interactions on the metabolism of itraconazole in recombinant insect microsomes, and to characterize the potential mechanism of substrate selectivity. Incubations with itraconazole (0.2-15 µM) in the presence/absence of lopinavir or darunavir were assessed by CYP3A4 variants, and the metabolite hydroxyitraconazole concentrations were measured by UPLC-MS/MS. Our data showed that when compared with CYP3A4.1, 4 variants (CYP3A4.9, .10, .28 and .34) displayed no significant differences, and 3 variants (CYP3A4.14, .15 and .19) exhibited increased intrinsic clearance (CLint), whereas the remaining 17 variant proteins showed decreased enzyme activities for the catalysis of itraconazole. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of lopinavir and darunavir on itraconazole metabolism varied in different degrees. Furthermore, different changed trend of the kinetic parameters in ten variants (CYP3A4.5, .9, .10, .16, .19, .24, .28, .29, .31, and .33) were observed, especially CYP3A4.5 and CYP3A4.16, and this may be related to the metabolic site-heme iron atom distance. In the present study, we functionally analyzed the effects of 25 CYP3A4 protein variants on itraconazole metabolism for the first time, and provided comprehensive data on itraconazole metabolism in vitro. This may help to better assess the metabolism and elimination of itraconazole in clinic to improve the safety and efficacy of its clinical treatment and also provide new possibilities for the treatment of COVID-19.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of lopinavir in HIV negative individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2: a COPEP (COronavirus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis) sub-study.

BACKGROUND: Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is a drug traditionally used for the treatment of HIV that has been repurposed as a potential post-exposure prophylaxis agent against COVID-19 in the COronavirus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (COPEP) study. The present analysis aims to evaluate LPV levels in individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2 versus people living with HIV (PLWH) by developing a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model, while characterizing external and patient-related factors that might affect LPV exposure along with dose-response association. METHODS: We built a popPK model on 105 LPV concentrations measured in 105 HIV-negative COPEP individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2, complemented with 170 LPV concentrations from 119 PLWH followed in our routine therapeutic drug-monitoring programme. Published LPV popPK models developed in PLWH and in COVID-19 patients were retrieved and validated in our study population by mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The association between LPV model-predicted residual concentrations (Cmin) and the appearance of the COVID-19 infection in the COPEP participants was investigated. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination best described LPV concentrations in both our analysis and in the majority of the identified studies. Globally, similar PK parameters were found in all PK models, and provided close MPEs (from -19.4% to 8.0%, with a RMSE of 3.4% to 49.5%). No statistically significant association between Cmin and the occurrence of a COVID-19 infection could be detected. CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicated that LPV circulating concentrations were similar between COPEP participants and PLWH, and that published popPK models described our data in a comparable way.