ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance between the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and preoperative LARS (POLARS) scores regarding the incidence of LARS in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery for cancer in a high-volume hospital. METHOD: The LARS score questionnaire, following telephone requests, was used to determine the presence and severity of LARS. The POLARS score was calculated based on variables described previously. Correlations and qualitative and quantitative concordance were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the kappa coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria: 37.5% underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 61% underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and 51.6% underwent ostomy. A total of 49% of patients did not present with LARS, whereas 28% had major LARS. The correlation between scales was poor, with a fair qualitative concordance to determine the presence/absence of LARS and a slight qualitative concordance to determine the degree of the intensity. The quantitative concordance was poor. CONCLUSION: In the Chilean population, concordance between the LARS and POLARS scores was qualitatively fair to determine the presence/absence of the disease and qualitatively slight to determine the degree of intensity. We do not suggest using the POLARS score in the perioperative period in the Chilean population deliberately, as the score may help to determine the presence/absence of LARS but cannot determine its degree of intensity. Additional evaluations are required to determine the factors contributing to the degree of agreement between the scales.
Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Low Anterior Resection Syndrome , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Incidence , Chile/epidemiology , Hospitals, High-Volume , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: Las cirugías con preservación de esfínter tienen como consecuencia el desarrollo de una disfunción defecatoria con diferentes grados, la cual es conocida como síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS) y es medida con el cuestionario LARS Score. Objetivo: Determinar la asociación del cuestionario EuroQol-5 (calidad de vida) con los diferentes grados de LARS Score. Materiales y Método: Estudio de tipo transversal, aplicando el cuestionario LARS Score y EuroQol-5 a pacientes operados por cáncer de recto medio y bajo, durante el periodo 2004-2017. Se realiza análisis demográfico y del tipo de cirugía. Para determinar asociaciones entre variables se utilizan diferentes pruebas estadísticas, considerando significativo un valor de p < 0,05. Resultados: Se encuestó a 54 pacientes, 62,16% hombres, promedio de edad 58,44 años, el 37,03% presentó LARS Mayor. Los índices promedio de calidad de vida para pacientes No LARS es 0,75, para LARS Menor es 0,69 y para LARS Mayor es 0,61, la diferencia entre índices presenta un valor p = 0,246. 46,3% presenta problemas en actividades habituales. LARS Mayor presenta un Odd-Ratio de 3,8 y 4,7 para dolor/malestar y angustia/depresión respectivamente. 70% de los pacientes con LARS Mayor presentaron resección total del mesorrecto (TME) y el 45% corresponde a menores de 65 años. Discusión: No existe diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los índices de calidad de vida según LARS Score. LARS Mayor tiene mayor posibilidad de desarrollar algún grado de dolor/malestar y angustia/depresión. El porcentaje de LARS Mayor es acorde a lo publicado y la TME es uno de los factores de mayor impacto en el desarrollo de LARS. Conclusiones: El LARS Score se relaciona de manera no significativa con el índice de calidad de vida entregado por el cuestionario EuroQol-5D, existiendo una tendencia a disminuir la calidad de vida a medida que empeora el LARS.
Introduction: Sphincter-sparing surgeries result in the development of a defecatory dysfunction with different degrees, which is known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and is measured with the LARS Score questionnaire. Objective: To determine the association of the EuroQol-5 questionnaire with the different degrees of LARS Score. Materials and Method: Crosssectional study, applying the LARS Score and EuroQol-5 questionnaire to patients operated with low and middle rectal cancer, during the period 2004-2017. Demographic analysis and type of surgery are performed. Different statistical tests are used to determine associations between variables, considering a significant p value < 0.05. Results: 54 patients were surveyed, 62.16% men, mean age 58.44 years, 37.03% presented Mayor-LARS. The average quality of life indices for Non-LARS patients is 0.75, for Minor-LARS is 0.69 and for Mayor-LARS is 0.61, the difference between indices presents a p value = 0.246. 46.3% present problems in habitual activities. LARS Mayor presents an Odd-Ratio of 3.8 and 4.7 for pain/discomfort and anguish/depression respectively. 70% of patients with LARS Mayor presented SMT and 45% corresponded to those under 65 years of age. Discussion: There is no statistically significant difference between the quality of life indices according to the LARS Score. Mayor-LARS is more likely to develop some degree of Pain/Discomfort and anguish/depression. The percentage of Mayor-LARS is according to what has been published and the TME is one of the factors with the greatest impact on the development of LARS. Conclusion: The LARS Score is non-significantly related to the quality of life index provided by the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, and there is a tendency to decrease quality of life as the LARS worsens.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Low Anterior Resection Syndrome/psychology , Postoperative Period , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Proctectomy/psychologyABSTRACT
Resumen Durante las últimas décadas los avances en técnicas quirúrgicas, radioterapia y quimioterapia han logrado de forma significativa aumentar la sobrevida y disminuir la recidiva local en el cáncer de recto evitando una colostomía definitiva; sin embargo, este trascendental progreso médico no ha ido acompañado de una mejoría en los resultados funcionales de los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía conservadora de esfínter, siendo el conjunto de síntomas defecatorios posterior a la resección rectal, conocido como síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS), una secuela prácticamente inevitable, que generalmente se asocia a disfunción sexual, urinaria, dolor crónico, altos costos en rehabilitación y control sintomático, además de una alteración importante en la calidad de vida. En este artículo presentamos una revisión completa y actualizada de las características clínicas y alternativas de tratamiento del LARS, finalizando con una propuesta de manejo integral multidisciplinario que destaca la importancia de la prehabilitación, evaluación objetiva de los síntomas, educación e información adecuada del paciente y su familia, además del trabajo en equipo en unidades especializadas de rehabilitación de piso pélvico, requisito fundamental a la hora de manejar adecuadamente esta patología.
During the last decades, advances in surgical techniques, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have significantly increased survival and reduced local recurrence in rectal cancer, avoiding a definitive colostomy. However, this transcendental medical progress has not been accompanied by an improvement in the functional results of patients after sphincter-preserving rectal resection, being the set of defecatory symptoms after rectal resection, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), a practically inevitable sequel, which is usually associated with sexual or urinary dysfunction, chronic pain, high costs and an important alteration in the quality of life. In this article, we will present a complete and updated review of the clinical and alternative characteristics of LARS treatment, ending with a proposal for multidisciplinary and integral management that highlights the importance of prehabilitation, objective evaluation of symptoms, education and adequate information of the patient and his family, in addition to teamwork in units specialized in pelvic floor rehabilitation, a fundamental requirement when properly managing this pathology.