Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 111(3_Suppl): 137-140, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981465

ABSTRACT

The single onchocerciasis-endemic focus in the remote Amazon rainforest is shared by Brazil and Venezuela and affects primarily the indigenous Yanomami people. Regional elimination of onchocerciasis is challenged by the magnitude and inaccessibility of this area. In Brazil, 272 onchocerciasis-endemic communities are operationally organized through 21 health centers ("polos bases"). Mass drug administration of ivermectin began in 1995, with 36 effective biannual rounds (≥85% coverage of the eligible population) through 2022. The national on chocerciasis program maintains community-level monitoring to prioritize treatment activities and epidemiological surveys. The Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas and the WHO onchocerciasis elimination guidelines have helped Brazil move toward its goal of stopping ivermectin treatment by 2025 and verifying transmission elimination by 2030. Additional challenges to the Brazilian onchocerciasis program include cross-border movements and insecurity due to illegal mining and inter-community conflicts. The new government in Brazil offers hope given its commitment to the equity of indigenous people and preservation of the Amazon environment.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication , Ivermectin , Onchocerciasis , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Disease Eradication/methods , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Mass Drug Administration , Filaricides/therapeutic use
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 111(3_Suppl): 81-88, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38917782

ABSTRACT

Haiti is endemic for lymphatic filariasis (LF) and malaria, two mosquito-transmitted parasitic diseases targeted for elimination. The World Health Organization recommends a transmission assessment survey (TAS-1) to determine if LF prevalence is significantly beneath putative transmission thresholds (<2% antigen prevalence in Haiti, where Culex is the primary vector for Wuchereria bancrofti) to stop mass drug administration (MDA). Repeated TASs (TAS-2 and TAS-3) are recommended at 2-3-year intervals during post-treatment surveillance. From 2017 to 2022, The Carter Center assisted the Haitian Ministry of Public Health and Population in conducting 15 TASs in 11 evaluation units (EUs) encompassing 54 of the country's 146 districts. Children 6-7 years old were assessed for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) by Filariasis Test Strip: n = 5,239 in TAS-1; n = 11,866 in TAS-2; and n = 1,842 in TAS-3, of whom eight (0.15%), 20 (0.17%), and eight (0.43%) tested positive, respectively. The number of positive results in children was less than the threshold in each EU. When available, participants (n = 16,663) were also tested for malaria by rapid diagnostic test, with 31 (0.19%) children testing positive for Plasmodium falciparum. Integrated TASs provided an efficient means to collect epidemiological data for LF and malaria in Haiti. Results indicated thresholds for stopping and maintaining the halt of MDA for LF have been achieved in all EUs, with the halt of MDA for 571,358 people in four districts and the first TAS-3 surveys conducted in Haiti. Investigations are needed to assess the potential of ongoing LF transmission, especially in areas where CFA-positive samples were detected in TAS-3.


Subject(s)
Elephantiasis, Filarial , Malaria , Wuchereria bancrofti , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/transmission , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Child , Female , Male , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/transmission , Malaria/prevention & control , Prevalence , Animals , Surveys and Questionnaires , Mosquito Vectors/parasitology , Culex/parasitology , Adolescent , Mass Drug Administration , Adult
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 111(3_Suppl): 127-136, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861970

ABSTRACT

In the Americas, onchocerciasis has been eliminated in 11 of 13 endemic foci by mass administration of ivermectin. The remaining at-risk population resides in a contiguous cross-border transmission zone located in the Amazon jungle in northwest Brazil and southern Venezuela, known as the Yanomami Focus Area. Here, we describe the development and implementation of a data-driven tool, called the Scorecard Approach (SCA), for the 393 communities that comprise the Venezuela South Focus. The SCA was first applied in 2018 and is reassessed on an annual basis. This operational strategy seeks to prioritize communities with low ivermectin coverage while taking into account the nature and variation of other epidemiological and logistical variables. Numeric scores are assigned for each factor and added together to yield a composite score for each community that is categorized as high, medium, or low priority. In this way, the SCA serves as a valuable and comprehensive strategy for planning, monitoring, and maximizing programmatic efficiency. In addition, it has allowed the country to face the main challenges of this endemic area: its remoteness, its large areas of territory to cover, the semi-nomadic nature of the Yanomami people, and their continuous cross-border movements. For 2022, the SCA categorized 54 (13.7%), 108 (27.5%), and 231 (58.8%) communities as high, medium, and low priority, respectively. The results presented here show that prioritizing communities at risk and with greatest needs increases the feasibility of interrupting the transmission of onchocerciasis by 2025 in the last endemic focus in the Americas.


Subject(s)
Ivermectin , Onchocerciasis , Venezuela/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/transmission , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Humans , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Disease Eradication/methods , Mass Drug Administration
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S160-S168, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) aims to reduce and maintain infection levels through mass drug administration (MDA), but there is evidence of ongoing transmission after MDA in areas where Culex mosquitoes are the main transmission vector, suggesting that a more stringent criterion is required for MDA decision making in these settings. METHODS: We use a transmission model to investigate how a lower prevalence threshold (<1% antigenemia [Ag] prevalence compared with <2% Ag prevalence) for MDA decision making would affect the probability of local elimination, health outcomes, the number of MDA rounds, including restarts, and program costs associated with MDA and surveys across different scenarios. To determine the cost-effectiveness of switching to a lower threshold, we simulated 65% and 80% MDA coverage of the total population for different willingness to pay per disability-adjusted life-year averted for India ($446.07), Tanzania ($389.83), and Haiti ($219.84). RESULTS: Our results suggest that with a lower Ag threshold, there is a small proportion of simulations where extra rounds are required to reach the target, but this also reduces the need to restart MDA later in the program. For 80% coverage, the lower threshold is cost-effective across all baseline prevalences for India, Tanzania, and Haiti. For 65% MDA coverage, the lower threshold is not cost-effective due to additional MDA rounds, although it increases the probability of local elimination. Valuing the benefits of elimination to align with the GPELF goals, we find that a willingness to pay per capita government expenditure of approximately $1000-$4000 for 1% increase in the probability of local elimination would be required to make a lower threshold cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Ag thresholds for stopping MDAs generally mean a higher probability of local elimination, reducing long-term costs and health impacts. However, they may also lead to an increased number of MDA rounds required to reach the lower threshold and, therefore, increased short-term costs. Collectively, our analyses highlight that lower target Ag thresholds have the potential to assist programs in achieving lymphatic filariasis goals.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Elephantiasis, Filarial , Mass Drug Administration , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Humans , Mass Drug Administration/economics , Haiti/epidemiology , Tanzania/epidemiology , Prevalence , India/epidemiology , Animals , Disease Eradication/economics , Disease Eradication/methods , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Filaricides/economics , Antigens, Helminth/blood , Culex
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 6271, 2024 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491091

ABSTRACT

Soil-transmitted-helminth (STH) infections continue to be a persistent global public health problem. Control strategies for STH have been based on the use of mass drug administration (MDA). Coverage and compliance assessment is critical to understanding the true effectiveness of albendazole (ABZ) in those MDA programs. The aims of this work were to characterize the pattern of albendazole and metabolites excretion in human saliva, and to develop a saliva-based biomarker (HPLC drug/metabolite detection) useful to accurately estimate the coverage/compliance in MDA campaigns. The study subjects were 12 healthy volunteers treated with a single oral dose of ABZ (400 mg). Saliva and blood (dried blood spot, DBS) samples were taken previously and between 2 and 72 h post-treatment. The samples were analyzed by HPLC with UV detection, C18 reversed-phase column. ABZ sulphoxide was the main analyte recovered up to 72 h p.t. in blood and saliva. The concentration profiles measured in the blood (DBS samples) were higher (P < 0.05) than those in saliva, however, this ABZ-metabolite was recovered longer in saliva. The in vivo measurement of drugs/metabolites in saliva samples from ABZ-treated volunteers offers strong scientific evidence to support the use of saliva as a valid biological sample for assessing compliance in MDA programs.


Subject(s)
Albendazole , Anthelmintics , Humans , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Saliva/metabolism , Mass Drug Administration , Patient Compliance
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(5): 943-950, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507804

ABSTRACT

Current WHO guidelines for onchocerciasis elimination provide requirements for stopping mass drug administration of ivermectin and the verification of elimination of transmission. These guidelines also recommend post-elimination surveillance (PES) based on entomological surveys. Serological markers in humans could complement entomological PES once the longevity of anti-OV-16 antibody responses is better understood. In 2014-2015 we evaluated ELISA anti-OV-16 IgG4 antibody persistence among previously seropositive people from the central endemic zone of Guatemala. The country stopped all onchocerciasis program interventions in 2012 and was verified by WHO as having eliminated transmission of onchocerciasis in 2016. A total of 246 participants with prior OV-16 ELISA results from 2003, 2006, 2007, or 2009 were enrolled in a follow-up study. Of these, 77 people were previously OV-16 seropositive and 169 were previously seronegative. By 2014 and 2015, 56 (72.7%) previously seropositive individuals had sero-reverted, whereas all previous negatives remained seronegative. The progression of antibody responses over time was estimated using a mixed-effects linear regression model, using data from seropositive participants who had sero-reverted. The temporal variation showed a mean activity unit decay of 0.20 per year (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.17, 0.23), corresponding to an estimated antibody response half-life of 3.3 years (95% CrI: 2.7, 4.1). These findings indicate that the majority of seropositive people will sero-revert over time.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Helminth , Immunoglobulin G , Onchocerciasis , Humans , Guatemala/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/transmission , Onchocerciasis/immunology , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Female , Adult , Antibodies, Helminth/blood , Middle Aged , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Disease Eradication/methods , Endemic Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Onchocerca volvulus/immunology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Mass Drug Administration
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 108(6): 1127-1139, 2023 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160282

ABSTRACT

For a malaria elimination strategy, Haiti's National Malaria Control Program piloted a mass drug administration (MDA) with indoor residual spraying (IRS) in 12 high-transmission areas across five communes after implementing community case management and strengthened surveillance. The MDA distributed sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and single low-dose primaquine to eligible residents during house visits. The IRS campaign applied pirimiphos-methyl insecticide on walls of eligible houses. Pre- and post-campaign cross-sectional surveys were conducted to assess acceptability, feasibility, drug safety, and effectiveness of the combined interventions. Stated acceptability for MDA before the campaign was 99.2%; MDA coverage estimated at 10 weeks post-campaign was 89.6%. Similarly, stated acceptability of IRS at baseline was 99.9%; however, household IRS coverage was 48.9% because of the high number of ineligible houses. Effectiveness measured by Plasmodium falciparum prevalence at baseline and 10 weeks post-campaign were similar: 1.31% versus 1.43%, respectively. Prevalence of serological markers were similar at 10 weeks post-campaign compared with baseline, and increased at 6 months. No severe adverse events associated with the MDA were identified in the pilot; there were severe adverse events in a separate, subsequent campaign. Both MDA and IRS are acceptable and feasible interventions in Haiti. Although a significant impact of a single round of MDA/IRS on malaria transmission was not found using a standard pre- and post-intervention comparison, it is possible there was blunting of the peak transmission. Seasonal malaria transmission patterns, suboptimal IRS coverage, and low baseline parasitemia may have limited the effectiveness or the ability to measure effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Insecticides , Malaria , Humans , Primaquine/adverse effects , Mass Drug Administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Haiti/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Mosquito Control , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control
8.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 108(6): 1140-1144, 2023 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37127264

ABSTRACT

In 2018, a mass drug administration (MDA) campaign for malaria elimination was piloted in Haiti. The pilot treated 36,338 people with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and primaquine; no severe adverse events were detected. In 2020, another MDA campaign using the same medications was implemented to mitigate an upsurge in malaria cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Four cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) were identified among the 42,249 people who took the medications. Three of these individuals required hospitalization; all survived. In addition to SP ingestion, an investigation of potential causes for increased SJS cases identified that all four cases had human leukocyte antigens A*29 and/or B*44:03, another known risk factor for SJS. Additionally, three of the four case individuals had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, and the fourth may have been exposed around the same time. These findings raise the possibility that recent SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to the increased risk for SJS associated with SP exposure during the 2020 campaign.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , COVID-19 , Malaria , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome , Humans , Primaquine/adverse effects , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/etiology , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/drug therapy , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/epidemiology , Haiti/epidemiology , Mass Drug Administration , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Pyrimethamine/adverse effects , Sulfadoxine/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control
9.
Washington, D.C.; Organisation panaméricaine de la Santé; 2023-05-17.
in French | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-57517

ABSTRACT

Cette série de modules de formation s’adresse aux gestionnaires de programmes de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (MTN), aux travailleurs du secteur de la santé publique à l’échelle nationale et infranationale, aux distributeurs communautaires de médicaments, aux agents de santé communautaires, au personnel régional et national de l’OMS, aux organisations non gouvernementales et aux autres partenaires associés à la mise en œuvre, ainsi qu’aux donateurs qui soutiennent la lutte contre les MTN et leur élimination. Ce module porte sur l’innocuité des médicaments destinés au traitement des MTN et présente brièvement les autres modules de la série. Les objectifs d’apprentissage de ce module sont les suivants : se familiariser avec le mouvement mondial visant à promouvoir la « sécurité des patients » et son importance dans le cadre des programmes de lutte contre les MTN ; comprendre les défis liés à l’innocuité qui entourent l’administration des médicaments destinés au traitement des MTN ; et connaître les définitions des effets indésirables et des effets indésirables graves, et les types d’effets indésirables qui doivent faire l’objet d’une investigation et d’une déclaration.


Subject(s)
Neglected Diseases , Mass Drug Administration , Global Health
10.
Malar J ; 22(1): 47, 2023 Feb 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36759860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community engagement (CE) plays a critical role in malaria control and elimination. CE approaches vary substantially, with more participatory programmes requiring higher levels of adaptive management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a volunteer-based CE programme developed in Haiti in 2018. The approach was based on local leaders organizing and implementing monthly anti-malaria activities in their communities, and was implemented as part of Malaria Zero Consortium activities. METHODS: This programme evaluation draws on quantitative and qualitative data collected from 23 Community Health Councils (CHCs) over a two-year period (2019-2021) in Grand'Anse department, a malaria hotspot region in Haiti. RESULTS: Monthly monitoring data showed that 100% of the 23 CHCs remained functional over the two-year period, with an average of 0.90 monthly meetings held with an 85% attendance rate. A high degree of transparency and diversity in membership helped create strong planning and involvement from members. CHCs conducted an average of 1.6 community-based activities per month, directly engaging an average of 123 people per month. High levels of fluctuation in monthly activities were indicative of local ownership and self-organization. This included school and church sensitization, environmental sanitation campaigns, mass education, support for case referrals and community mobilization during mass drug administration (MDA) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaigns. Members drew on the tradition of konbit (mutual self-help), local histories of health and development campaigns and a lexicon of "solidarity" in difficult times as they negotiated their agency as community volunteers. Small incentives played both symbolic and supportive roles. Some level of politicization was viewed as inevitable, even beneficial. Rumours about financial and political profiteering of CHC volunteers took time to dispel while the tendency towards vertical planning in malaria control created conditions that excluded CHCs from some activities. This generated resentment from members who felt sidelined by the government malaria programme. CONCLUSION: The CHC model was effective in promoting group solidarity and community-based anti-malaria activities over a two-year period in Haiti. With the end of the Malaria Zero Consortium in early 2021, there is now an opportunity to better integrate this programme into the primary healthcare system, evaluate the impact of the CHCs on malaria epidemiology, and promote the greater integration of CHCs with active surveillance and response activities.


Subject(s)
Malaria , Public Health , Humans , Haiti/epidemiology , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Mass Drug Administration , Focus Groups
11.
Washington, D.C.; OPAS; 2023-02-13.
in Portuguese | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-57138

ABSTRACT

Esta série de módulos de treinamento destina-se a gerentes de programas de combate a doenças tropicais negligenciadas (DTN), trabalhadores de saúde pública de nível nacional e subnacional, distribuidores comunitários de medicamentos, agentes comunitários de saúde, funcionários dos escritórios nacionais e regionais da OMS, organizações não governamentais e outros parceiros de implementação, bem como doadores que apoiam o controle e erradicação das DTN. Este módulo introduz o tema de segurança em DTN e fornece um panorama geral dos outros módulos da série. Os objetivos de aprendizagem para este módulo são: familiarizar-se com o movimento global de “segurança do paciente” e sua importância para os programas de combate a DTN; conhecer os desafios de segurança na administração de medicamentos para DTN; e compreender as definições de evento adverso e evento adverso grave, e os tipos de eventos adversos que devem ser investigados e notificados.


Subject(s)
Neglected Diseases , Mass Drug Administration , Global Health
12.
Washington, D.C.; OPS; 2022-11-15.
in Spanish | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-56705

ABSTRACT

Esta serie de módulos de capacitación está dirigida a los directores de los programas contra las enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (ETD), los trabajadores de salud pública del ámbito nacional o subnacional, los distribuidores de medicamentos en la comunidad, los agentes comunitarios de salud, el personal de la OMS en las oficinas regionales y en los países, las organizaciones no gubernamentales, otros asociados en la ejecución de los programas y los donantes que apoyan las actividades de control y eliminación de las ETD. Este módulo presenta el tema de la seguridad en lo que concierne a las ETD y proporciona una visión general de los otros módulos de la serie. Los objetivos formativos de este módulo son los siguientes: familiarizarse con el movimiento global de “seguridad del paciente” y su importancia para los programas contra las ETD, conocer los desafíos de seguridad durante la administración de medicamentos para las ETD y comprender las definiciones de evento adverso y evento adverso grave, así como los tipos de eventos adversos que se deben investigar y notificar.


Subject(s)
Neglected Diseases , Mass Drug Administration , Global Health
13.
Washington D.C; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 1 ed; Jul. 2022. 68 p. ilus.
Monography in Spanish | MINSAPERÚ, LIPECS | ID: biblio-1379492

ABSTRACT

La presente publicación proporciona herramientas prácticas, incluidos módulos de capacitación y guías de trabajo, para que los programas nacionales de enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (o enfermedades infecciosas desatendidas) los utilicen durante la planificación, la preparación y la vigilancia de la administración inocua de medicamentos para el tratamiento de estas afecciones. En él se resumen aspectos fundamentales de la seguridad de los medicamentos y de su administración, y se hace hincapié en los medicamentos esenciales de la administración masiva de medicamentos, que también se conoce como quimioprofilaxis. El público destinatario son los directores de programa, los trabajadores de salud pública del ámbito nacional o subnacional, los distribuidores de medicamentos en la comunidad, los agentes comunitarios de salud, el personal de las oficinas de la OMS a nivel regional y en los países, las organizaciones no gubernamentales, otros asociados durante la ejecución de los programas, y los donantes que apoyan las actividades.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Communicable Diseases , Community Health Workers , Drugs, Essential , Disaster Preparedness , Surveillance in Disasters , Neglected Diseases , Mass Drug Administration , Occupational Groups
14.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010231, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) has been targeted for global elimination as a public health problem since 1997. The primary strategy to interrupt transmission is annual mass drug administration (MDA) for ≥5 years. The transmission assessment survey (TAS) was developed as a decision-making tool to measure LF antigenemia in children to determine when MDA in a region can be stopped. The objective of this study was to investigate potential sampling strategies for follow-up of LF-positive children identified in TAS to detect evidence of ongoing transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Nippes Department in Haiti passed TAS 1 with 2 positive cases and stopped MDA in 2015; however, 8 positive children were found during TAS 2 in 2017, which prompted a more thorough assessment of ongoing transmission. Purposive sampling was used to select the closest 50 households to each index case household, and systematic random sampling was used to select 20 households from each index case census enumeration area. All consenting household members aged ≥2 years were surveyed and tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using the rapid filarial test strip and for Wb123-specific antibodies using the Filaria Detect IgG4 ELISA. Among 1,927 participants, 1.5% were CFA-positive and 4.5% were seropositive. CFA-positive individuals were identified for 6 of 8 index cases. Positivity ranged from 0.4-2.4%, with highest positivity in the urban commune Miragoane. Purposive sampling found the highest number of CFA-positives (17 vs. 9), and random sampling found a higher percent positive (2.4% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, both purposive and random sampling methods were reasonable and achievable methods of TAS follow-up in resource-limited settings. Both methods identified additional CFA-positives in close geographic proximity to LF-positive children found by TAS, and both identified strong signs of ongoing transmission in the large urban commune of Miragoane. These findings will help inform standardized guidelines for post-TAS surveillance.


Subject(s)
Elephantiasis, Filarial , Filaricides , Animals , Antigens, Helminth/therapeutic use , Child , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Drug Administration/methods , Prevalence , Wuchereria bancrofti
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(1): e0010150, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35089925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) is a decision-making tool to determine when transmission of lymphatic filariasis is presumed to have reached a level low enough that it cannot be sustained even in the absence of mass drug administration. The survey is applied over geographic areas, called evaluation units (EUs); existing World Health Organization guidelines limit EU size to a population of no more than 2 million people. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2015, TASs were conducted in 14 small EUs in Haiti. Simulations, using the observed TAS results, were performed to understand the potential programmatic impact had Haiti chosen to form larger EUs. Nine "combination-EUs" were formed by grouping adjacent EUs, and bootstrapping was used to simulate the expected TAS results. When the combination-EUs were comprised of at least one "passing" and one "failing" EU, the majority of these combination-EU would pass the TAS 79% - 100% of the time. Even in the case when both component EUs had failed, the combination-EU was expected to "pass" 11% of the time. Simulations of mini-TAS, a strategy with smaller power and hence smaller sample size than TAS, resulted in more conservative "passing" and "failing" when implemented in original EUs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate the high potential for misclassification when the average prevalence of lymphatic filariasis in the combined areas differs with regards to the TAS threshold. Of particular concern is the risk of "passing" larger EUs that include focal areas where prevalence is high enough to be potentially self-sustaining. Our results reaffirm the approach that Haiti took in forming smaller EUs. Where baseline or monitoring data show a high or heterogeneous prevalence, programs should leverage alternative strategies like mini-TAS in smaller EUs, or consider gathering additional data through spot check sites to advise EU formation.


Subject(s)
Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Mass Drug Administration , Population Density , Computer Simulation , Decision Support Techniques , Elephantiasis, Filarial/transmission , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence
16.
J Infect Dis ; 225(9): 1611-1620, 2022 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Haiti is planning targeted interventions to accelerate progress toward malaria elimination. In the most affected department (Grande-Anse), a combined mass drug administration (MDA) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaign was launched in October 2018. This study assessed the intervention's effectiveness in reducing Plasmodium falciparum prevalence. METHODS: An ecological quasi-experimental study was designed, using a pretest and posttest with a nonrandomized control group. Surveys were conducted in November 2017 in a panel of easy access groups (25 schools and 16 clinics) and were repeated 2-6 weeks after the campaign, in November 2018. Single-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and primaquine was used for MDA, and pirimiphos-methyl as insecticide for IRS. RESULTS: A total of 10 006 participants were recruited. Fifty-two percent of the population in the intervention area reported having received MDA. Prevalence diminished between 2017 and 2018 in both areas, but the reduction was significantly larger in the intervention area (ratio of adjusted risk ratios, 0.32 [95% confidence interval, .104-.998]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a moderate coverage, the campaign was effective in reducing P. falciparum prevalence immediately after 1 round. Targeted MDA plus IRS is useful in preelimination settings to rapidly decrease the parasite reservoir, an encouraging step to accelerate progress toward malaria elimination.


Subject(s)
Insecticides , Malaria , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Insecticides/pharmacology , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Mass Drug Administration , Mosquito Control
17.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(9): e0009596, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guyana is one of four countries in the Latin American Region where lymphatic filariasis (LF) remains endemic. In preparation for the introduction of a new triple drug therapy regimen (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole (IDA)) in 2019, an acceptability study was embedded within sentinel site mapping in four regions to assess mass drug administration (MDA) coverage and compliance, acceptability, and perceptions about treatment and disease. The results from this survey would inform the rollout of IDA in Guyana in 2019. METHODS: Data collection for the study occurred in August 2019, using a validated questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. Across all regions, a total of 1,248 participants were sampled by the Filarial Mapping team. Four-hundred and fifty-one participants aged over 18 years were randomly selected for participation in an expanded acceptability questionnaire. All data were captured in Secure Data Kit (SDK). RESULTS: Acceptability was measured using a mean acceptability score. Unadjusted mean scores ranged from 24.6 to 29.3, with 22.5 as the threshold of acceptability. Regional variation occurred across many indicators of interest: self-rated understanding about LF, mechanisms of LF transmission, LF drug safety and history of treatment during MDA. Region IV (Georgetown) recorded higher knowledge about LF, but lower compliance and acceptability. Number of pills was not perceived as a concern. CONCLUSION: Acceptability of MDA was good across all four regions under study. Results from this study set a baseline level for key indicators and acceptability, from which the acceptability of IDA can be measured. Regional variations across indicators suggest that localized approaches should be considered for social mobilization and MDA delivery to capture these contextual differences.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication/methods , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Mass Drug Administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Community Health Services , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Guyana/epidemiology , Humans , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Sentinel Surveillance , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(9): 2389-2398, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424165

ABSTRACT

Optimal control strategies for Taenia solium taeniasis and cysticercosis have not been determined. We conducted a 2-year cluster randomized trial in Peru by assigning 23 villages to 1 of 3 geographically targeted intervention approaches. For ring screening (RS), participants living near pigs with cysticercosis were screened for taeniasis; identified cases were treated with niclosamide. In ring treatment (RT), participants living near pigs with cysticercosis received presumptive treatment with niclosamide. In mass treatment (MT), participants received niclosamide treatment every 6 months regardless of location. In each approach, half the villages received targeted or mass oxfendazole for pigs (6 total study arms). We noted significant reductions in seroincidence among pigs in all approaches (67.1% decrease in RS, 69.3% in RT, 64.7% in MT; p<0.001), despite a smaller proportion of population treated by targeted approaches (RS 1.4%, RT 19.3%, MT 88.5%). Our findings suggest multiple approaches can achieve rapid control of T. solium transmission.


Subject(s)
Cysticercosis , Taenia solium , Animals , Cysticercosis/drug therapy , Cysticercosis/epidemiology , Cysticercosis/prevention & control , Humans , Mass Drug Administration , Peru/epidemiology , Swine
19.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(8): e0009590, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34375332

ABSTRACT

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a mosquito-transmitted parasitic disease that is a leading cause of disability globally. The island of Hispaniola, which the Dominican Republic shares with Haiti, accounts for approximately 90% of LF cases in the Americas region. In 1998, the Dominican Ministry of Public Health created the Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (PELF) with the goal of eliminating LF transmission by 2020. Baseline mapping revealed 19 (12% of total) endemic municipalities clustered into three geographic foci (Southwest, La Ciénaga and East), with a total at-risk population of 262,395 people. Beginning in 2002, PELF sequentially implemented mass drug administration (MDA) in these foci using albendazole and diethylcarbamazine (DEC). In total, 1,174,050 treatments were given over three to five annual rounds of house-to-house MDA per focus with a median coverage of 81.7% (range 67.4%-92.2%). By 2018, LF antigen prevalence was less than 2% in all foci, thus meeting criteria to stop MDA and begin post-treatment surveillance (PTS). This success has been achieved against a shifting landscape of limited domestic funding, competing domestic public health priorities, and sporadic external donor support. Remaining steps include the need to scale-up morbidity management and disability prevention services for LF and to continue PTS until LF transmission is interrupted across Hispaniola.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication/history , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Mass Drug Administration/statistics & numerical data , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Disease Eradication/methods , Dominican Republic/epidemiology , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Prevalence , Public Health
20.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(9): e0043221, 2021 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152813

ABSTRACT

Soil-transmitted-helminth (STH) infections are a persistent global public health problem. Control strategies for STH have been based on the use of mass drug administration (MDA) mainly targeting preschool- and school-aged-children, although there is increasing interest in expanding treatment to include adults and others through community-wide MDA. Coverage assessment is critical to understanding the real effectiveness of albendazole (ALB) treatment in those MDA programs. The work described here aims to (i) evaluate the effect of type of diet (a heavy or light meal) and fasting before ALB treatment on the systemic disposition of ALB and its metabolites in treated human volunteers and (ii) evaluate the potential feasibility of detecting albendazole metabolites in urine. The data reported here demonstrate that the systemic availability of the active ALB-sulfoxide (ALBSO) metabolite was enhanced more than 2-fold after food ingestion (a heavy or light meal). ALB dissolution improvement related to the ingestion of food may modify the amount of drug/metabolites reaching the parasite, affecting drug efficacy and the overall success of MDA strategies. The measurement in urine samples of the amino-ALB-sulfone (NHALBSO2) derivative and ALBSO for up to 96 h suggests that it may be feasible to develop a noninvasive tool to evaluate compliance/adherence to ALB treatment.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics , Helminthiasis , Absorption, Physiological , Adult , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Healthy Volunteers , Helminthiasis/drug therapy , Humans , Mass Drug Administration , Soil
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL