Carcinogenic metal compounds: recent insight into molecular and cellular mechanisms.

Mechanisms of carcinogenicity are discussed for metals and their compounds, classified as carcinogenic to humans or considered to be carcinogenic to humans: arsenic, antimony, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, nickel and vanadium. Physicochemical properties govern uptake, intracellular distribution and binding of metal compounds. Interactions with proteins (e.g., with zinc finger structures) appear to be more relevant for metal carcinogenicity than binding to DNA. In general, metal genotoxicity is caused by indirect mechanisms. In spite of diverse physicochemical properties of metal compounds, three predominant mechanisms emerge: (1) interference with cellular redox regulation and induction of oxidative stress, which may cause oxidative DNA damage or trigger signaling cascades leading to stimulation of cell growth; (2) inhibition of major DNA repair systems resulting in genomic instability and accumulation of critical mutations; (3) deregulation of cell proliferation by induction of signaling pathways or inactivation of growth controls such as tumor suppressor genes. In addition, specific metal compounds exhibit unique mechanisms such as interruption of cell-cell adhesion by cadmium, direct DNA binding of trivalent chromium, and interaction of vanadate with phosphate binding sites of protein phosphatases.

Selective accumulation of light or heavy rare earth elements using gram-positive bacteria.

The accumulation of samarium from a solution only containing samarium by Arthrobacter nicotianae was examined. The amount of accumulated samarium was strongly affected by the concentration of samarium and pH of the solution. The accumulation of samarium by the strain was very rapid and reached equilibrium within 3h. The accumulation of samarium-europium or europium-gadolinium from the solution containing the two metals using various actinomycetes and gram-positive bacteria was also examined. Most of the tested strains could accumulate similar amounts of samarium and europium; however, most of the tested strains could accumulate a greater amount of europium than gadolinium. Especially, the amounts of accumulated europium using gram-positive bacteria were higher than those using actinomycetes. The selective accumulations of light or heavy rare earth elements (REEs) using A. nicotianae and Streptomyces albus were also examined. The amounts of accumulated samarium and europium were higher than those of the other light REEs using both microorganisms. S. albus can accumulate greater lutetium than other REEs from a solution containing yttrium and eight heavy REEs. On the other hand, A. nicotianae can accumulate higher amounts of terbium and ytterbium than that of the other heavy REEs from the same solution. A. nicotianae can also accumulated higher amounts of Sm than other REEs from a solution containing six light REEs.