Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 90(2): 101382, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219449

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To find out if motion sickness susceptibility (MSS) of vestibular migraine (VM) patients and migraine only (MO) patients can be reliably detected with a single simple question: "Can you read while travelling in a car without getting motion sick?". METHOD: Ninety-two definite VM and 58 MO patients and 74 healthy control (HC) subjects were asked about their MSS and about being able to read while riding in a car without becoming motion sick. A Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (MSSQ-Short) including childhood (MSA), adulthood (MSB) and total (MST) parts was also administered to all participants. ROC curves of MSSQ-Short were prepared for "not being able to read in a car" as the gold standard. RESULTS: Mean MSA scores were significantly higher in both VM and MO patients than in HCs (p < 0.001), but their scores were not significantly different (p = 0.171). Mean MSB and MST scores were significantly higher in VM than in MO patients (p < 0.001) and both VM and MO patients had significantly higher scores than HCs (p < 0.001). MSA scores were significantly higher than MSB scores in MO patients (p < 0.001). All sections of the questionnaire were associated with high area-under-curve values for MSS detected by the question about being able to read in a car without becoming motion sick. CONCLUSION: We propose that all migraine patients could have the same level of MSS in childhood but MO patients are able to compensate over years, but VM patients are not. A quick way to determine MSS is to ask about the ability to read without becoming motion sickness while riding a car.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Motion Sickness , Humans , Adult , Motion Sickness/complications , Motion Sickness/diagnosis , Vertigo , Migraine Disorders/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 88 Suppl 3: S147-S154, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical features of patients with definite vestibular migraine (dVM). METHODS: A total of 91 patients with vestibular symptoms accompanied by migraines/migraine-like symptoms were enrolled and diagnosed according to the criteria of the Bárány Society and the International Headache Society. Baseline data were collected. Videonystagmography and immune-related laboratory tests were performed. RESULTS: Among the 91 patients, 62 (68.1%) had dVM (11 men, 51 women). Among dVM patients, migraine occurred earlier than vestibular symptoms in 42 (67.7%) patients. Spontaneous vertigo occurred in 41 (66.1%) patients. Induced vertigo occurred in 21 (33.9%) patients. Motion sickness occurred in 33 (53.2%) patients. Central oculomotor dysfunction was observed in 11 (17.7%) patients. Caloric test revealed unilateral horizontal semicircular canal dysfunction in 12 (19.4%) patients. Severe intolerance during the test occurred in 44 (71.0%) patients with dVM. 12 (19.4%) patients showed abnormal immune-related indicators. CONCLUSION: dVM is more common in women. The onset of migraine precedes that of vestibular symptoms, which are often accompanied by photophobia and phonophobia. Motion sickness and severe caloric test intolerance can contribute to the diagnosis of dVM. Immunological indicators are abnormal in some patients with dVM, dVM may be secondary or an accompanying disorder, but the causal relationship needs further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Motion Sickness , Vestibular Diseases , Vestibule, Labyrinth , Male , Humans , Female , Vertigo/diagnosis , Vertigo/etiology , Headache/complications , Motion Sickness/complications , Vestibular Diseases/complications , Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis
3.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 59(3): 220-225, 06/2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-751315

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the two anthropometric standards for screening of overweight and cardio-metabolic risk in 6–10-year-old children.Subjects and methods This cross-sectional study included 175 subjects attending the Referral Center for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents in Campos, Rio de Janeiro. They were classified according to CDC and WHO BMI z scores as normal-weight (z-score > –1 and < 1), overweight (z-score ≥ 1 and < 2) or obese (z-score ≥ 2). Sensitivities and specificities in predicting systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) alterations were calculated.Results There was a major difference in 11 children who rated overweight by the CDC but were reclassified as obese by the WHO. Their mean z-scores for SBP (1.71 ± 1.54), DBP (2.64 ± 1.83) and HOMA-IR (1.84 ± 0.98) were higher than those classified as overweight by both references (SBP = 0.49 ± 1.34, p < 0.023, DBP = 1.45 ± 0.97, p < 0.04 and HOMA = 1.24 ± 0.67, p < 0.04), but were similar to those classified as obese by both criteria (SBP = 1.25 ± 2.04, p = 0.60, DBP = 1.94 ± 1.19, p = 0.50 and HOMA = 2.09 ± 1.12, p = 0.76).Conclusion the 2007 WHO reference was the most sensitive in screening for overweight and alterations in blood pressure and HOMA-IR in 6–10-year-old children. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015;59(3):220-5.


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Male , Breeding , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Motion Sickness/complications , Motion Sickness/genetics , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/complications , Copper Sulfate/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Emetics/pharmacology , Nicotine/pharmacology , Shrews , Species Specificity
4.
Cephalalgia ; 30(2): 161-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19500116

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate, in patients with migraine and healthy volunteers, with and without a history of motion sickness, the degree of discomfort elicited by drifting striped patterns. Eighteen healthy volunteers (HV) and 30 migraine patients participated in the study. Discomfort was greater in migraine patients than in HV, and in individuals with a history of motion sickness than in those without, but the effect of history of migraine was independent of history of motion sickness. Generalized Estimating Equations models for binary correlated data revealed that these differences did not depend on levels of duty cycle, spatial and temporal frequencies. Visual discomfort in migraine patients was associated with worse performance. There was a significant correlation between median degree of discomfort across conditions and number of migraine attacks in the past month. Discomfort to drifting striped patterns may be related to central sensitization in migraine patients.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Motion Sickness/complications , Motion Sickness/physiopathology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation
6.
J Pediatr ; 130(1): 134-7, 1997 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9003863

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vomiting after mild head injury in children is related to migraine and to identify predictors of vomiting after head injury. METHODS: A series of consecutive children admitted to the observation unit of an emergency department after mild head injury was identified by chart review. A telephone interview with the parents or child or both was then conducted by using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 47 eligible children with acute head injury, 44 (94%) were contacted. The mean age at head injury was 7.4 years. Twenty-nine children (66%) vomited after the head injury. The likelihood of vomiting was increased if the child had a history of recurrent headache (p = 0.05). If the headaches were migrainous, the likelihood of vomiting increased further (p <0.002). All 15 children with a history of motion sickness vomited after the head injury. Family history of migraine, particularly maternal (n = 21), also predicted recurrent vomiting (p <0.001). If more than one of these predictive variables was present, the likelihood of vomiting was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: History of motion sickness, migraine headaches, and family history of migraine are highly predictive of vomiting after a mild head injury.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Migraine Disorders/complications , Vomiting/etiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Headache/complications , Humans , Infant , Male , Migraine Disorders/genetics , Motion Sickness/complications , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL