ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of atlantoaxial joint subluxation (AJS) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is characterized by an unequal distance between the lateral mass of the atlas and the odontoid process on imaging, resulting in neck pain accompanied by symptoms such as dizziness, headache, and limited cervical mobility. In Shanghai, Shi cervical rotational manipulation (SCRM) is a commonly employed TCM manual therapy for treating this condition. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence-based medical information regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of this technique. OBJECTIVE: The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients diagnosed with AJS. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that will be conducted at a single center and that has a follow-up period of 24 weeks. A total of 96 patients diagnosed with AJS will be recruited from outpatient and inpatient clinics at Shanghai Baoshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. These patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (SCRM) or the comparison group (basic cervical manipulation [BCM]). Treatment sessions consisting of SCRM or BCM will be administered twice a week for a duration of 4 weeks. Clinical monitoring indicators include the presence or absence of clinical symptoms as recorded on a symptom recording form, cervical imaging examination findings using cervical computed tomography, degree of neck pain measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), cervical range of motion assessed through cervical mobility measurement, degree of vertigo evaluated using the Vertigo Symptoms Scale-Chinese Version (VSS-C), and adverse events that may occur during the follow-up period. The time points for data collection and follow-up are baseline and postintervention (weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24). RESULTS: This paper presents an overview of the reasoning and structure of a prospective randomized controlled trial with the objective of investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients with AJS by assessing improvements in clinical symptoms, neck pain severity, and vertigo severity and evaluating changes in cervical imaging findings. Recruitment was started in March 2023. By the end of May 2024, 76 patients were included in this project. The last follow-up data are predicted to be collected by the end of February 2025. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation will yield dependable evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients with AJS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300068510; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=186883. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57865.
Subject(s)
Atlanto-Axial Joint , Joint Dislocations , Humans , Atlanto-Axial Joint/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/therapy , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Adult , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Treatment Outcome , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , China , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Young Adult , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative disease of the cervical spine characterized by persistent neck pain. Cervical facet joint mobilization (CM) and the osteopathic muscle energy technique (MET) are effective manual procedures for the treatment of neck pain. In this study, we compared the efficacy of the MET and CM techniques on pain, disability, and proprioception in 76 patients with CS. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 96 participants with a diagnosis of CS were randomized into an electro-thermal therapy (ET) group (control group, n=32), ET+MET group (experiment I, n=32), and ET+CM group (experiment II, n=32). All patients received 3 treatment sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain intensity, functional disability and cervical position sense were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS), and cervical range of motion (CROM) device. RESULTS The study was completed by 76 participants. VAS and CNFDS scores decreased significantly after treatment in all 3 groups (P<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Between-group analysis showed a significant difference in extension joint position error in favor of MET (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference between the groups in other movement directions (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS MET and CM have similar effects on improving pain and disability in individuals with CS and chronic neck pain. However, the results of this study show that MET combined with ET is a more effective method for improving cervical position sense.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Neck Pain , Pain Measurement , Proprioception , Range of Motion, Articular , Spondylosis , Humans , Spondylosis/therapy , Spondylosis/physiopathology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Proprioception/physiology , Adult , Pain Measurement/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Manipulation, Osteopathic/methods , Disability Evaluation , Zygapophyseal Joint/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Most patients with cervical radiculopathy improve within the first months without treatment or with non-surgical treatment. A systematic review concluded that these patients improve, regardless of their intervention. Still, many patients are offered surgery, despite limited evidence regarding the indications for surgical treatments. The aim of this article is to describe the intervention that is going to be followed in the non-surgical treatment arm of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: The non-surgical intervention is a functional intervention within a cognitive approach founded on previous experiences, and current recommendations for best practice care of musculoskeletal pain and cervical radiculopathy. It is based on the biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical perspective, comprises an interdisciplinary approach (physicians, physiotherapy specialists), and includes brief intervention and graded activities. The intervention consists of 6 sessions over 12 weeks. The primary goals are first, to validate the patients´ symptoms and build a therapeutic alliance, second, to explore the understanding and promote alternatives, and third, to explore problems and opportunities based on patients´ symptoms and function. Motivational factors toward self-management are challenging. We will attempt shared decision-making in planning progress for the individual patient and emphasise learning of practical self-help strategies and encouragement to stay active (reinforcing the positive natural course). General physical activities such as walking will be promoted along with simple functional exercises for the neck- and shoulder region. We will also explore social activity, comorbidities, pain location, sleep, and work-related factors. The health providers will set individualised goals together with each patient. DISCUSSION: The aim of the intervention is to describe a functional intervention within a cognitive approach for patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. The effectiveness of the present program will be compared to surgery in a randomised controlled trial.
Subject(s)
Radiculopathy , Humans , Radiculopathy/therapy , Radiculopathy/surgery , Radiculopathy/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Physical Therapy Modalities , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for odontoid fractures in older people remains debated. Odontoid fractures are increasingly relevant to clinical practice due to ageing of the population. METHODS: An international prospective comparative study was conducted in fifteen European centres, involving patients aged ≥55 years with type II/III odontoid fractures. The surgeon and patient jointly decided on the applied treatment. Surgical and conservative treatments were compared. Primary outcomes were Neck Disability Index (NDI) improvement, fracture union and stability at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analogue Scale neck pain, Likert patient-perceived recovery and EuroQol-5D-3L at 52 weeks. Subgroup analyses considered age, type II and displaced fractures. Multivariable regression analyses adjusted for age, gender and fracture characteristics. RESULTS: The study included 276 patients, of which 144 (52%) were treated surgically and 132 (48%) conservatively (mean (SD) age 77.3 (9.1) vs. 76.6 (9.7), P = 0.56). NDI improvement was largely similar between surgical and conservative treatments (mean (SE) -11 (2.4) vs. -14 (1.8), P = 0.08), as were union (86% vs. 78%, aOR 2.3, 95% CI 0.97-5.7) and stability (99% vs. 98%, aOR NA). NDI improvement did not differ between patients with union and persistent non-union (mean (SE) -13 (2.0) vs. -12 (2.8), P = 0.78). There was no difference for any of the secondary outcomes or subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome and fracture healing at 52 weeks were similar between treatments. Clinical outcome and fracture union were not associated. Treatments should prioritize favourable clinical over radiological outcomes.
Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Odontoid Process , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Odontoid Process/injuries , Odontoid Process/diagnostic imaging , Odontoid Process/surgery , Prospective Studies , Conservative Treatment/methods , Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Europe , Fracture Healing , Age Factors , Disability Evaluation , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Time Factors , Recovery of Function , Fracture Fixation/methods , Neck Pain/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a prognostic model to predict chronic pain after a new episode of acute or subacute non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain in patients presenting to physiotherapy primary care, emphasising modifiable biomedical, psychological and social factors. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up between January 2020 and March 2023. SETTING: 30 physiotherapy primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a new presentation of non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain, with a duration lasting no longer than 12 weeks from onset. BASELINE MEASURES: Candidate prognostic variables collected from participants included age and sex, neck pain symptoms, work-related factors, general factors, psychological and behavioural factors and the remaining factors: therapeutic relation and healthcare provider attitude. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) after inclusion. An NPRS score of ≥3 at each time point was used to define chronic neck pain. RESULTS: 62 (10%) of the 603 participants developed chronic neck pain. The prognostic factors in the final model were sex, pain intensity, reported pain in different body regions, headache since and before the neck pain, posture during work, employment status, illness beliefs about pain identity and recovery, treatment beliefs, distress and self-efficacy. The model demonstrated an optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.83 and a corrected R2 of 0.24. Calibration was deemed acceptable to good, as indicated by the calibration curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a p-value of 0.7167, indicating a good model fit. CONCLUSION: This model has the potential to obtain a valid prognosis for developing chronic pain after a new episode of acute and subacute non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain. It includes mostly potentially modifiable factors for physiotherapy practice. External validation of this model is recommended.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neck Pain , Physical Therapy Modalities , Primary Health Care , Humans , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/etiology , Female , Male , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Prognosis , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Adult , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Low back and neck pain are common musculoskeletal disorders with multiple treatment options. India's traditional medical systems, known as Ayush (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa and Homoeopathy) offer range of interventions and are widely used. In view of limited documentation of adverse events following Ayush interventions for lumbar and cervical spondylosis, we synthesized evidence and estimated proportion of studies reporting adverse events. METHODS: We systematically searched all published documents from biomedical and multidisciplinary abstract and citation databases and Ayush-specific repositories from their inception to April 2021. We selected studies as per inclusion criteria and extracted information, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We systematically reviewed the qualitative evidence form the selected studies. RESULTS: Majority (94%) of the selected 113 studies were interventional studies and included 77 (68.1%) journal articles and 35 (31%) academic dissertations. Among the Ayush systems, considerable proportion was from Ayurveda (32.7%), followed by Siddha (24.8%), Yoga (22.1%), Unani (15.9%) and Homoeopathy (4.4%). Almost three-fourths of the studies were on lumbar spondylosis (65%; n = 74), followed by cervical spondylosis (31%; n = 35), and the remaining four included both. Thirteen percent of the 113 studies described adverse events [Yoga = 9.7%; Unani = 1.8% and Homoeopathy = 1.8%]. More adverse events were reported among the studies on lumbar (9.7%) than cervical spondylosis (2.7%). The nature of interventions were non-pharmacological (10.6%; n = 12), pharmacological (n = 2; 1.8%) or combined (n = 1; 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Only one in eight studies reported any adverse event following Ayush interventions for cervical and lumbar spondylosis. There could be certain degree of underreporting of adverse events and requires further exploration. PROSPERO Registration ID CRD42020167433.
Subject(s)
Spondylosis , Humans , Spondylosis/therapy , India/epidemiology , Medicine, Ayurvedic/methods , Medicine, Ayurvedic/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae , Cervical Vertebrae , Neck Pain/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a neck-specific exercise programme with internet support and 4 physiotherapist sessions (NSEIT) and the same neck-specific exercises supervised by a physiotherapist (NSE) on neck muscle endurance and cervical range of motion. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS: A total of 140 participants with chronic whiplash-associated disorders grade II or grade III were randomly assigned to the NSEIT or NSE groups. METHODS: Outcomes were changes in active cervical range of motion, cranio-cervical flexion test, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain, at 3- and 15-month follow-ups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the NSEIT and NSE groups. There was a significant group-by-time inter-action effect in active cervical range of motion flexion/extension where the NSEIT group improved to 3-month follow-up, but the NSE group did not. Both groups were significantly improved over time in all other outcomes (p < 0.001) at 3- and 15-month follow-ups, with effect size between 0.64 and 1.35 in active cervical range of motion, cranio-cervical flexion test, dorsal neck muscle endurance, and neck pain, and effect size between 0.22 and 0.42 in ventral neck muscle endurance. CONCLUSION: Both NSE and NSEIT led to improved neck function. Depending on the patients' needs, either NSE or NSEIT could be used as treatment for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Neck Muscles , Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Whiplash Injuries , Humans , Whiplash Injuries/physiopathology , Whiplash Injuries/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Male , Female , Adult , Exercise Therapy/methods , Neck Muscles/physiopathology , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Internet , Chronic Disease , Physical Endurance/physiologyABSTRACT
We are writing because we have a number of concerns about the Takakura et al. [...].
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Chronic Pain , Neck Pain , Humans , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Acupuncture Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neck Pain/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Chronic Pain/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Japan , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Text neck syndrome is an overuse condition that has become a global problem for all ages who use smartphones. Although therapeutic approaches are used to manage text neck syndrome, relatively little evidence exists on efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques on individuals with text neck syndrome. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants with text neck syndrome were randomly allocated to either the experimental or control group. Both groups performed the program including cervical range of motion, strengthening, and posture correction exercises for 6 weeks, 3 days a week, once a day for 10 repetitions. In the experimental group were included in a PNF program 3 days a week for 6 weeks. In the program, contract-relax and replication techniques were used. Pain intensity, cervical range of motion, cervical muscles' endurance, posture, and disability were assessed. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Pain intensity, neck muscle endurance tests, posture, and disability scores significantly improved in both groups (Pâ <â .05). The cervical range of motion values in all directions were significantly increased only in the experimental group (Pâ <â .05). The improvements in pain intensity, neck muscle endurance tests, posture, and disability scores were greater in the experimental group compared with the control group (Pâ <â .05). CONCLUSION: PNF could be used effectively to reduce neck pain and disability level and enhance cervical range of motion, cervical muscles' endurance, and posture in individuals with text neck syndrome.
Subject(s)
Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Female , Male , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Adult , Neck Muscles/physiopathology , Proprioception/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Text Messaging , Smartphone , Posture/physiology , Young Adult , Syndrome , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a prevalent global musculoskeletal issue, significantly contributing to the loss of years of healthy life due to disability. Chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) involves diverse symptoms impacting mobility and quality of life. While therapeutic exercises demonstrate efficacy, the role of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the additional effects of PBMT within a multimodal therapeutic intervention for CNNP. METHODS: A randomized, two-arm, controlled, blind clinical trial follows CONSORT and SPIRIT guidelines. Participants diagnosed with CNNP will receive a stand-alone multimodal therapeutic intervention or the same program with additional PBMT. The primary outcomes will be assessed by the functional disability identified through applying the NDI (Neck Disability Index). Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity during rest and active neck movement, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia, functionality, and disability assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow-up. Both groups receive pain education before personalized interventions, including resistance exercises, neuromuscular activities, mobility, and body balance. The PBMT group undergoes low-level light therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis, using linear mixed models, employs data presented as mean, standard deviation, and differences with a 95% confidence interval. Non-normally distributed variables transform. Statistical significance is set at 5%. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a critical gap in understanding the combined effects of PBMT and therapeutic exercises for CNNP. The findings aim to guide clinicians, researchers, and CNNP sufferers through rigorous methodology and diverse outcome assessments, offering valuable insights into evidence-based practices for CNNP management. Data confidentiality is maintained throughout, ensuring participant privacy during statistical analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Effects of adding photobiomodulation to a specific therapeutic exercise program for the treatment of individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain, registration number: NCT05400473, on 2022-05-27.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low-Level Light Therapy , Neck Pain , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Combined Modality Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement , Disability Evaluation , Adult , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Exercise Therapy/methods , Time Factors , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The physical and cognitive demands of combat flying may influence the development and persistence of flight-related neck pain (FRNP). The aim of this pilot study was to analyse the effect of a multimodal physiotherapy program which combined supervised exercise with laser-guided feedback and interferential current therapy on psychophysiological variables in fighter pilots with FRNP. METHODS: Thirty-one fighter pilots were randomly assigned to two groups (Intervention Group: n = 14; Control Group: n = 17). The intervention consisted of 8 treatment sessions (twice per week) delivered over 4 weeks. The following primary outcomes were assessed: perceived pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale-NPRS) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV; time-domain, frequency-domain and non-linear variables). A number of secondary outcomes were also assessed: myoelectric activity of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid, pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale-PCS) and kinesiophobia (TSK-11). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) within and between groups were observed for all outcomes except for frequency domain and non-linear HRV variables. A significant time*group effect (one-way ANOVA) in favour of the intervention group was found for all variables (p<0.001). Effect sizes were large (d≥0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a multimodal physiotherapy program consisting of supervised exercise with laser-guided feedback and interferential current appears to show clinical benefit in fighter pilots with FRNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05541848.
Subject(s)
Neck Pain , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pilots , Humans , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/psychology , Pilot Projects , Adult , Male , Pilots/psychology , Military Personnel/psychology , Heart Rate/physiology , Pain Measurement , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Low back pain is an important disability problem frequently encountered in the clinic. In the literature, it has been shown that neuropathic pain in chronic low back pain is quite common in patients. Although superior cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome is an underdiagnosed cause of low back and leg pain, differential diagnosis is very important anatomically and clinically. The superior cluneal nerves are pure sensory nerves that innervate the skin of the upper part of the buttocks. In the literature, methods such as surgery, nerve blockade, prolotherapy, and acupuncture have been used in the treatment of cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, but there are no studies on exercise. In this case report, our aim is to explain the importance of differential diagnosis in cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, which is one of the common causes of low back pain in the clinic, and the effects of exercise in this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old, Turkish-ethnicity, male patient with complaints of low back pain, neck-back pain, and weakness did not use alcohol or cigarettes. In his family history, there was a history of diabetes in the mother and diabetes and heart failure in the father. He had a history of osteoporosis, epilepsy, asthma, sarcoidosis, and cardiac arrhythmia. The patient reported that he suffered from constipation three to four times a month. As a result of the detailed evaluation, the planned exercise prescription was taught to the patient, and after it was confirmed that the patient did the exercises correctly for 3 days, the exercise brochure was given and followed as a home exercise program for 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar stabilization exercises, gluteal muscle strengthening exercises, thoracolumbar fascia mobilization, and stretching exercises, which will be given in accordance with the clinical anatomy of the disease after the correct diagnosis in cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, have been beneficial for the patient. However, we think that randomized controlled studies with a large sample will contribute to the literature.
Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Nerve Compression Syndromes , Humans , Male , Low Back Pain/therapy , Nerve Compression Syndromes/therapy , Nerve Compression Syndromes/physiopathology , Young Adult , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Exercise , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/etiology , Buttocks/innervation , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Self-management is endorsed in clinical practice guidelines for the care of musculoskeletal pain. In a randomized clinical trial, we tested the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-based self-management app (selfBACK) as an adjunct to usual care for patients with low back and neck pain referred to specialist care. OBJECTIVE: This study is a process evaluation aiming to explore patients' engagement and experiences with the selfBACK app and specialist health care practitioners' views on adopting digital self-management tools in their clinical practice. METHODS: App usage analytics in the first 12 weeks were used to explore patients' engagement with the SELFBACK app. Among the 99 patients allocated to the SELFBACK interventions, a purposive sample of 11 patients (aged 27-75 years, 8 female) was selected for semistructured individual interviews based on app usage. Two focus group interviews were conducted with specialist health care practitioners (n=9). Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Nearly one-third of patients never accessed the app, and one-third were low users. Three themes were identified from interviews with patients and health care practitioners: (1) overall impression of the app, where patients discussed the interface and content of the app, reported on usability issues, and described their app usage; (2) perceived value of the app, where patients and health care practitioners described the primary value of the app and its potential to supplement usual care; and (3) suggestions for future use, where patients and health care practitioners addressed aspects they believed would determine acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the app's uptake was relatively low, both patients and health care practitioners had a positive opinion about adopting an app-based self-management intervention for low back and neck pain as an add-on to usual care. Both described that the app could reassure patients by providing trustworthy information, thus empowering them to take actions on their own. Factors influencing app acceptance and engagement, such as content relevance, tailoring, trust, and usability properties, were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04463043; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04463043.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Low Back Pain , Mobile Applications , Neck Pain , Self-Management , Humans , Female , Self-Management/methods , Middle Aged , Male , Low Back Pain/therapy , Adult , Neck Pain/therapy , Aged , Qualitative Research , Focus GroupsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Stiff neck is a condition mainly characterised by persistent pain and limited neck movement, which can substantially impact patients' daily lives during acute episodes. Accordingly, rapid pain relief and restoration of normal activities are the main needs of patients during doctor visits. This study aims to assess the immediate efficacy of acupuncture combined with active exercises in rapidly relieving pain and improving movement disorders within 10 min in patients with acute stiff neck (ASN). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled clinical trial is being conducted at a single centre in China. 120 participants diagnosed with ASN will randomly be assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: the acupuncture combined with active exercise group (group A), sham acupuncture combined with active exercise group (group B) and active exercise only group (group C). Each participant will undergo a single 10 min session. The primary outcome is the effective rate at 10 min of treatment. Secondary outcomes include the effective rate at other time points (0-1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 min), Visual Analogue Scale score and cervical range of motion. The intention-to-treat analysis will include all randomised participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine (2022-009). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before randomisation. The findings of this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200066997.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Exercise Therapy , Neck Pain , Humans , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Exercise Therapy/methods , Neck Pain/therapy , Adult , Female , Male , Movement Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , China , Combined Modality Therapy , Pain Measurement , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of eyeball exercise and cervical stabilization programs to patients with chronic neck pain, tension-type headache (TTH), and forward head posture (FHP). MATERIAL AND METHODS The design of this study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: the experimental group (n=20) and the control group (n=20). Both groups received cervical manual therapy and biofeedback-guided stabilization exercises (30 min/session, 3 sessions/week, 6 weeks). In addition to the regular treatments, the participants in the experimental group also performed eyeball exercises for 20 minutes per session, 3 sessions per week, for a total of 6 weeks. Changes in neck pain (numeric rating scale, NRS), neck disability index (NDI), quality of life (Short Form-12 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-12), headache impact test-6 (HIT-6), craniovertebral angle (CVA), cranial rotation angle (CRA), and muscle tone were measured. RESULTS Both groups showed significant improvements in NRS, NDI, SF-12, HIT-6 scores, CVA, CRA, and muscle tone (p<0.05). The experimental group had significant differences in NDI, SF-12, HIT-6 scores, and suboccipital muscle tone compared to the control (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Combining the eyeball exercise program with commonly used manual therapy and stabilization exercises for patients with chronic neck pain can help reduce nerve compression and promote muscle relaxation in the eye and neck areas. The method is thus proposed as an effective intervention to enhance function and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain patients, TTH, and FHP.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Exercise Therapy , Neck Pain , Posture , Quality of Life , Tension-Type Headache , Humans , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Tension-Type Headache/therapy , Tension-Type Headache/physiopathology , Female , Adult , Male , Exercise Therapy/methods , Posture/physiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Head , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for refractory low back pain and neck pain with and without limb pain in clinical trial and real-world studies. However, limited information is available in the literature on the type and frequency of programming parameters required to optimize pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective trial and postimplant clinical and system device data were analyzed from consecutive patients with neck pain and low back pain, with and without limb pain, from a single clinical site, including both thoracic and cervical lead placement. Best bipole, stimulation parameters, and outcomes, including pain relief, change in opioid medication use, sleep, and daily function, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients in the trial, 70 received a permanent implant. Of these, the mean duration of follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.3 years. Pain relief of ≥50% at the last follow-up was achieved by 64% of patients implanted; in addition, 65% reduced their opioid medication use; 65% reported improved sleep, and 71% reported improved function. There was some consistency between the "best" bipole at trial and permanent implant, with 82% of patients within one bipole location, including 54% of permanent implants who were using the same best bipole as at trial. After permanent implant, device reprogramming was minimal, with ≤one reprogramming change per patient per quarter required to maintain pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In the study, 10-kHz SCS was an effective therapy for treating chronic pain, whereby a high responder rate (≥50% pain relief) was achieved with short time to pain relief in trial and maintained with limited device programming after permanent implant. The data presented here provide insight into the programming required during the trial and implant stages to obtain and maintain therapeutic efficacy.
Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Low Back Pain/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Neck Pain/therapy , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Time Factors , Pain Measurement/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cervical spondylosis is a chronic degenerative process of the cervical spine characterized by pain in neck, degenerative changes in intervertebral disc and osteophyte formation. Cervical spondylosis is translated as Waja' ur Raqaba, a type of joint pain. The present study was aimed to evaluate the effect of wet cupping in the pain management of cervical spondylosis. METHODS: This Open, randomized, controlled, clinical study was conducted on 44 patients. Subjects in the test group (n = 22) received a series of three-staged wet cupping treatment, performed on 0, 7th and 14th day. Subjects in the control group (n = 22) received 12 sittings of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): 6 sittings per week for two weeks. The objective findings of treatment were assessed with the help of VAS, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Cervical range of motion. RESULTS: Intra group comparison in test group from baseline to 21st day were found highly significant (p < 0.001) in terms of VAS, NDI, Flexion, Extension and Left rotation score. While in Right rotation, Left rotation and Left lateral flexion score were found moderately significant (p < 0.01). Statistically significant difference was observed between two groups at 21st day in VAS scale, NDI, and Cervical range of motion score (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Hijama Bish Shart was found better in the management of pain due to cervical spondylosis than TENS. It can be concluded that Hijama Bish Shart may a better option for the pain management of cervical spondylosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on clinical trial registry website (www.ctri.nic.in) bearing a CTRI Number, CTRI/2020/03/024,249.
Subject(s)
Cupping Therapy , Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Spondylosis , Humans , Spondylosis/complications , Spondylosis/therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Neck Pain/therapy , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Cupping Therapy/methods , Pain Measurement , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Pain Management/methods , Cervical VertebraeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Visceral referred pain is a common form of disease-induced pain, with visceral nociception being referred to somatic tissues. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case report was to evaluate the immediate and long term effects of a novel osteopathic visceral technique (OVT) on pain and cervical range of motion (CROM) in a patient with nonspecific neck pain (NS-NP). METHOD: A case of a 47-year-old female suffering with NS-NP for four months. The patient had sought physiotherapy treatment several times, and occasionally used anti-inflammatory medication to relieve symptoms. The patient presented muscle cervical tenderness and hyperalgesia over the spinous processes of C3-C4 spinal segments with limited CROM. A novel osteopathic visceral manipulation (OVM) technique was applied in the epigastric region targeting the pancreas. Immediately after the treatment, the patient reported reduction in pain evaluated with the numerical evaluation scale (NRS), and a clinically significant increase in pressure pain threshold (PPT) in C3 spinous process. Improvement in CROM was also observed. The post-treatment improvements have been maintained at 1-month of follow-up assessment. CONCLUSION: A single OVT was effective in reducing cervical pain and increasing CROM in a patient with NS-NP caused by a viscerosomatic reflex. The results of this case study provides preliminary evidence that OVM can produce hypoalgesia in somatic tissues with segmentally related innervation. This finding encourages future research to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of regional inhibitory interdependence involving the viscerosomatic reflexes of OVM.
Subject(s)
Manipulation, Osteopathic , Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Female , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Manipulation, Osteopathic/methods , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Pancreas , Cervical Vertebrae , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of the Mulligan mobilization technique on pain intensity and range of motion in individuals with neck pain. METHODS: Forty individuals with mechanical neck pain were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups and a total of 10 sessions of treatment were administered to all 2 groups for 2 weeks, 5 days a week. Mulligan mobilization technique, electrophysical agents, active range of motion, and stretching exercises were carried out in the Mulligan group. In contrast, only electrophysical agents and exercises were applied to the conventional physiotherapy group. Range of motion (ROM) of the neck, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used for evaluation. RESULTS: Statistical analyses were done to compare the amounts at the baseline and immediately after treatment. Statistically significant improvements were found in the post-treatment ROM, VAS, NPDS values in both groups (p < 0.05). When the differences were compared, the results of the Mulligan group were significantly better than the conventional physiotherapy group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of SF-36 parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the Mulligan mobilization technique plus conventional physiotherapy is more effective than conventional physiotherapy in increasing joint range of motion, reducing pain, and reducing neck disability. TRIAL REGISTRATON: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05074576).
Subject(s)
Neck Pain , Pain Measurement , Physical Therapy Modalities , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/therapy , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise Movement Techniques/methods , Disability EvaluationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neck pain remains the fourth leading cause of disability and work loss, and a multimodal treatment approach is effective in reducing neck pain and disability. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the use of cervical traction for managing neck pain by Physiotherapists in India, including how and when the traction is used, the modes and parameters of traction, any additional interventions given with traction, and the influence of professional demographic characteristics in decision making in traction usage. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. METHODOLOGY: A random sample of approximately 2500 musculoskeletal physiotherapists was surveyed, and the data was presented in a descriptive form. Chi-square analyses were used to identify the association between responders' qualifications and traction usage. RESULTS: From the total physiotherapist approached 18.52% (n = 463) responses were obtained, and 62% (n = 287) respondents reported that they would use traction in their clinical practice. Out of 92.3% of responders indicated using traction for radiculopathy, 78.7% of respondents used traction for patients with neck pain without radiculopathy. It is used as a combination therapy by 58.8% for radiculopathy and 52.2% for stiffness. There was no association between the responder's qualification and traction usage (χ2 = 0.707, p = 0.40). Traction is used in combination with other physiotherapeutic techniques. CONCLUSION: Traction use was consistent with the proposed criteria identifying patients likely to benefit. However, disregarding current guidelines, physiotherapists also use traction for non-radicular neck pain. Various traction delivery modes and parameters were used within a comprehensive plan of care incorporating multiple interventions.