Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 202.451
1.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 134, 2024 May 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702689

OBJECTIVES: A considerable number of patients are diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We aimed to evaluate whether radical prostatectomy (RP) brings survival benefits for these patients, especially in the elderly with advanced PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to obtain PCa cases diagnosed with TURP. After the propensity matching score (PSM) for case matching, univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate whether RP impacts the survival benefit. RESULTS: 4,677 cases diagnosed with PCa by TURP from 2010 to 2019 were obtained, including 1,313 RP patients and 3,364 patients with no RP (nRP). 9.6% of RP patients had advanced PCa. With or without PSM, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) were significantly reduced in the RP patients compared to the nRP patients, even for older (> 75 ys.) patients with advanced stages (all p < 0.05). Except for RP, younger age (≤ 75 ys.), being married, and earlier stage (localized) contributed to a significant reduction of CSM risk (all p < 0.05). These survival benefits had no significant differences among patients of different ages, married or single, and at different stages (all p for interaction > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this retrospective population-matched study, we first found that in patients diagnosed with PCa by TURP, RP treatment may lead to a survival benefit, especially a reduction in CSM, even in old aged patients (> 75 ys.) with advanced PCa.


Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , SEER Program , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Prostatectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate/trends
2.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 560, 2024 May 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704543

BACKGROUND: Developing countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: In cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Data in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.


Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Adult , Lebanon/epidemiology , Age Factors , Prognosis , Disease-Free Survival , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Aged , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging
3.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 30: 1611716, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706775

Locally advanced non-small lung cancer encompasses a diverse range of tumors. In the last few years, the treatment of stage III unresectable non-small lung cancer has evolved significantly. The PACIFIC trial opened a new therapeutic era in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC, establishing durvalumab consolidation therapy as the new standard of care worldwide. A careful evaluation of this type of lung cancer and a discussion of the management of these patients within a multidisciplinary team represents a crucial step in defining the best treatment strategy for each patient. For unresectable stage III NSCLC, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was historically recommended as a treatment with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 20% to 30%. The PACIFIC study conducted in 2017 compared the use of chemoradiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab to a placebo in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who had not experienced disease progression. The study was prospective, randomized, and phase III. The administration of this medication in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated a notable improvement in overall survival. Multiple clinical trials are currently exploring various immune checkpoint inhibition regimens to enhance the treatment efficacy in patients with stage III cancer. Our goal is to offer an up-to-date summary of the planned clinical trials for treatment options, focusing on the significant obstacles and prospects in the post-PACIFIC era.


Antibodies, Monoclonal , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Chemoradiotherapy , Immunotherapy , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging
4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(5): 306-310, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709694

BACKGROUND: There are no guidelines on when to more strongly recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for T1b melanomas. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether anatomic locations of T1b melanomas and patient age influence metastases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from two hospitals in Los Angeles County from January 2010 through January 2020. RESULTS: Out of 620 patients with primary melanomas, 566 melanomas were staged based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition melanoma staging. Forty-one were T1b, of which 13 were located on the face/ear/scalp and 28 were located elsewhere. T1b melanomas located on the face/ear/scalp had an increased risk of lymph node or distant metastasis compared with other anatomic sites (31% vs 3.6%, P=0.028). For all melanomas, the risk of lymph node or distant metastasis decreased with age of 64 years or greater (P<0.001 and P=0.034). For T1b melanomas, the risk of distant metastasis increased with increasing age (P=0.047). LIMITATIONS: Data were from a single county.  Conclusion: T1b melanomas of the face/ear/scalp demonstrated a higher risk of lymph node or distant metastasis and may help guide the recommendation of SLNB, imaging, and surveillance. Younger patients may be more strongly considered for SLNB and older patients with T1b melanomas may warrant imaging.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):306-310. doi:10.36849/JDD.7667.


Lymphatic Metastasis , Melanoma , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Female , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Age Factors , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Acta Oncol ; 63: 277-287, 2024 May 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711384

BACKGROUND: Primary metastatic breast cancer (pMBC) accounts for 5-10% of annual breast cancers with a median survival of 3-4 years, varying among subtypes. In Denmark, the incidence of breast cancer increased until 2010, followed by a stabilisation. Several factors influencing pMBC incidence and survival, including screening prevalence, staging methods, and classification standards, remain pivotal but inadequately documented. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective observational study involving pMBC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 encompassed all Danish oncology departments. Data from the Danish Breast Cancer Group database and the National Patient Register included diagnosis specifics, demographics, treatment, and follow-up. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2020, 3,272 patients were diagnosed with pMBC, a rise from 355 patients in 2000-2004 to 1,323 patients in 2015-2020. The increase was particularly observed in patients aged 70 years or older. Changes in tumour subtypes were observed, notably with a rise in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cases but a steady distribution of estrogen receptor (ER) status. Diagnostic practices changed over the two decades, with 6% evaluated with PET/CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) or CT (computed tomography) with a bone evaluation in 2000-2004 and 65% in 2015-2020. Overall survival (OS) improved from 23 months in 2000-2004 to 33 months in 2015-2020. In patients with ER-positive and HER2-positive disease, the multivariable model showed improved survival by year of diagnosis, and further, patients with ER-negative/HER2-negative disease fared worse the first 2 years after diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: Our study delineates changes in the treatment and survival of pMBC over two decades. Stage migration, screening introduction, and changes in registration practice, however, prevent a valid assessment of a possible causal relationship.


Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Neoplasm Staging , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Denmark/epidemiology , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Incidence , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Survival Rate , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Neoplasm Metastasis , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
6.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 307, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722418

PURPOSE: To explore pre-treatment risk factors for overall survival (OS) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with first-line (1L) chemotherapy in sequential therapy (ST) era. Additionally, to evaluate the proportion of patients who were not able to undergo subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy according to the subgroups stratified by the risk factors. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted. Metastatic or locally advanced UC patients treated between 2017 and 2022 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were used to address OS. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen patients treated with 1L chemotherapy were included in the study and 57 (18.2%) patients were not able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy. Pre-chemotherapy risk factors for OS in 314 patients were ECOG-PS 1 or more, having no primary site resection, C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 3 mg/dL or more, and non-cisplatin-based regimen. Patients having 3 or 4 risk factors had higher risk for not being able to receive ST (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001). As risk factors for OS in 230 patients who were able to receive ST, having no primary site resection, a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 or more, and the presence of liver metastasis were identified. CONCLUSION: We reported the risk factors for OS in advanced UC patients treated with 1L chemotherapy in ST era. Patients with high risk for OS may not be able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy even in the ST era.


Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Survival Rate , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/mortality , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
7.
Radiographics ; 44(6): e230175, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722785

The most common abdominal malignancies diagnosed in the pediatric population include neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, lymphoma, germ cell tumor, and rhabdomyosarcoma. There are distinctive imaging findings and patterns of spread for each of these tumors that radiologists must know for diagnosis and staging and for monitoring the patient's response to treatment. The multidisciplinary treatment group that includes oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists relies heavily on imaging evaluation to identify the best treatment course and prognostication of imaging findings, such as the image-defined risk factors for neuroblastomas, the PRETreatment EXtent of Disease staging system for hepatoblastoma, and the Ann Arbor staging system for lymphomas. It is imperative for radiologists to be able to correctly indicate the best imaging methods for diagnosis, staging, and restaging of each of these most prevalent tumors to avoid inconclusive or unnecessary examinations. The authors review in a practical manner the most updated key points in diagnosing and staging disease and assessing response to treatment of the most common pediatric abdominal tumors. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.


Abdominal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Pelvic Neoplasms , Humans , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Neoplasms/therapy , Child , Pelvic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Hepatoblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Hepatoblastoma/therapy , Hepatoblastoma/pathology
8.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 207, 2024 May 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727774

Robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection is a novel technique. However, evidence in the literature regarding the advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) is insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLS versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer. We performed a retrospective study at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. Patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and underwent anterior resection between January 2019 to September 2023 were included in the study. We compared the basic characteristics of the patients and the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients in the two groups. A total of 452 patients were included. Based on propensity score matching, 212 patients (RLS, n = 106; CLS, n = 106) were included. The baseline data in RLS group was comparable to that in CLS group. Compared with CLS group, RLS group exhibited less estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), more harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.005), longer operation time (P < 0.001) and higher total hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in other perioperative or pathologic outcomes between the two groups. For 3-year prognosis, overall survival rates were 92.5% in the RLS group and 90.6% in the CLS group (HR 0.700, 95% CI 0.276-1.774, P = 0.452); disease-free survival rates were 91.5% in the RLS group and 87.7% in the CLS group (HR 0.613, 95% CI 0.262-1.435, P = 0.259). Compared with CLS, RLS for sigmoid colon cancer was found to be associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes. High total hospitalization costs of RLS did not translate into better long-term oncology outcomes.


Laparoscopy , Neoplasm Staging , Propensity Score , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Sigmoid Neoplasms , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/economics , Male , Female , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Sigmoid Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Colectomy/methods , Colectomy/economics , Survival Rate
9.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1310239, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711515

Background: For decades, stratification criteria for first-line clinical studies have been highly uniform. However, there is no principle or consensus for restratification after systemic treatment progression based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of disease progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for surgical intervention, following the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: This is a retrospective study that involved patients with inoperable China liver stage (CNLC) IIIa and/or IIIb. The patients were treated at eight centers across China between January 2017 and October 2022. All patients received at least two cycles of first-line treatment containing immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patterns of disease progression were assessed using RECIST criteria 1.1. Different progression modes have been identified based on the characteristics of imaging progress. The study's main outcome measures were post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the difference among the four groups. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different immunotherapy combinations. Variations in the efficacy of immunotherapy have also been noted across patient groups exhibiting alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels equal to or exceeding 400ng/mL, in contrast to those with AFP levels below 400ng/mL. Results: The study has identified four distinct patterns of progress, namely p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb, and p-IIIc. Diverse patterns of progress demonstrate notable variations in both PPS and OS. The group p-IIb had the longest PPS of 12.7m (95% 9.3-16.1) and OS 19.6m (95% 15.6-23.5), the remaining groups exhibited p-IIIb at PPS 10.5 months (95%CI: 7.9-13.1) and OS 19.2 months (95%CI 15.1-23.3). Similarly, p-IIIc at PPS 5.7 months (95%CI: 4.2-7.2) and OS 11.0 months (95%CI 9.0-12.9), while p-IIIa at PPS 3.4 months (95%CI: 2.7-4.1) and OS 8.2 months (95%CI 6.8-9.5) were also seen. Additional stratified analysis was conducted and showed there were no differences of immunotherapy alone or in combination in OS (HR= 0.92, 95%CI: 0.59-1.43, P=0.68) and PPS (HR= 0.88, 95%CI: 0.57-1.36, P=0.54); there was no significant difference in PPS (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.55-1.12, P=0.15) and OS (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.61-1.24, P=0.39) for patients with AFP levels at or over 400ng/mL. However, it was observed that patients with AFP levels above 400ng/mL experienced a shorter median progression of PPS (8.0 months vs. 5.0 months) after undergoing immunotherapy. Conclusion: In this investigation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma among Chinese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, we identified four distinct progression patterns (p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb and p-IIIc) that showed significant differences in PPS and OS. These findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of disease progression and prognosis after immunotherapy failure. Further validation in large cohorts is necessary to develop prognostic models that integrate distinct progression patterns to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Additionally, post-immunotherapy progression in patients with AFP levels ≥400ng/mL indicates a shortened median PPS. These findings provide valuable insights for future personalized treatment decisions.


Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Disease Progression , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/immunology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , China , Aged , Adult , Neoplasm Staging , alpha-Fetoproteins/metabolism , alpha-Fetoproteins/analysis , Treatment Outcome , East Asian People
10.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713611

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer improves survival compared with just D2 lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Between September 2014 and June 2018, patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision gastrectomy. The modified intention-to-treat population was defined as patients who had pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (pT1 N1-3 M0 and pT2-4 N0-3 M0). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the recurrence pattern and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (169 patients) and patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy +complete mesogastric excision group (169 patients) was 55 (interquartile range 37-60) months and 51 (interquartile range 40-60) months respectively. Recurrence occurred in 50 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (29.6%) versus 33 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (19.5%) (P = 0.032). The 3-year disease-free survival was 75.5% (95% c.i. 68.3% to 81.3%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.0% (95% c.i. 78.7% to 89.6%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.042). The HR for recurrence in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 0.99) by Cox regression (P = 0.045). The 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% c.i. 70.4% to 83.1%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.8% (95% c.i. 79.6% to 90.2%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.058). The HR for death in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 1.02) (P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional D2 dissection, D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision is associated with better disease-free survival, but there is no statistically significant difference in overall survival. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01978444 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).


Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Survival Rate , Neoplasm Staging
11.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(3): 229-234, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715162

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to investigate the potential role of abnormal lipid metabolism in the development of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A retrospective study design was used. The clinical data of 520 patients who underwent rectal prostate biopsy in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2023 were analysed. The patients were enrolled and divided into the anterior PCa group including 112 patients and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) group including 408 patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the two patient groups, and further comparisons were made according to the Gleason score and TNM staging. RESULTS: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level may be an independent risk factor for PCa, and it was significantly associated with the risk of PCa (odds ratio (OR) = 1.363, p = 0.030). Patients with PCa were further divided into the low risk group and the high risk group according to the Gleason score. Univariate analysis (p = 0.047) and logistic regression analysis (OR = 2.249, p = 0.036) revealed that LDL-C was a significant factor influencing the Gleason score. Patients with PCa were categorised into four groups based on TNM staging. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis (p = 0.015) and ordinal logistic regression analysis (OR = 2.414, p = 0.007) demonstrated that LDL-C was a significant factor influencing TNM staging. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the important role of LDL-C in the development of PCa, highlighting its influence as an independent risk factor. Thus, LDL-C may promote the proliferation and invasion of PCa cells.


Cholesterol, LDL , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging
12.
Fr J Urol ; 34(2): 102571, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717459

PURPOSE: To report on the oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) patients using the French SurACaP protocol, with a focus on long-term outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter study recruited patients with low-grade PCa between 2007 and 2013 in four referral centers in France. The cohort included patients meeting the SurACaP inclusion criteria, i.e., aged ≤75years, with low-grade PCa (i.e., ISUP 1), clinical stage T1c/T2a, PSA ≤10ng/mL and ≤3 positive cores and tumor length ≤3mm per core. The SurACaP protocol included a digital rectal examination every six months, PSA level measurement every three months for the first two years after inclusion and twice a year thereafter, a confirmatory biopsy in the first year after inclusion, and then follow-up biopsy every two years or if disease progression was suspected. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was progressively included over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10.6 years. Only one patient developed metastases and died of PCa. The estimated rates of grade reclassification and treatment-free survival at 15 years were 53.4% and 21.2%, respectively. A negative mpMRI at baseline and a negative confirmatory biopsy were significantly associated with a lower risk of disease progression (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AS using the French SurACaP protocol is a safe and valuable strategy for patients with low-risk PCa, with excellent oncological outcomes after more than 10 years' follow-up. Future studies are crucial to broaden the inclusion criteria and develop a personalized, risk based AS protocol with the aim of de-escalating follow-up examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.


Neoplasm Grading , Prostatic Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Time Factors , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Disease Progression , Digital Rectal Examination , Neoplasm Staging
13.
Genet Res (Camb) ; 2024: 4285171, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715622

Bladder cancer has recently seen an alarming increase in global diagnoses, ascending as a predominant cause of cancer-related mortalities. Given this pressing scenario, there is a burgeoning need to identify effective biomarkers for both the diagnosis and therapeutic guidance of bladder cancer. This study focuses on evaluating the potential of high-definition computed tomography (CT) imagery coupled with RNA-sequencing analysis to accurately predict bladder tumor stages, utilizing deep residual networks. Data for this study, including CT images and RNA-Seq datasets for 82 high-grade bladder cancer patients, were sourced from the TCIA and TCGA databases. We employed Cox and lasso regression analyses to determine radiomics and gene signatures, leading to the identification of a three-factor radiomics signature and a four-gene signature in our bladder cancer cohort. ROC curve analyses underscored the strong predictive capacities of both these signatures. Furthermore, we formulated a nomogram integrating clinical features, radiomics, and gene signatures. This nomogram's AUC scores stood at 0.870, 0.873, and 0.971 for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year predictions, respectively. Our model, leveraging radiomics and gene signatures, presents significant promise for enhancing diagnostic precision in bladder cancer prognosis, advocating for its clinical adoption.


Neoplasm Staging , Neural Networks, Computer , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Male , Female , RNA-Seq/methods , Aged , Nomograms , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , ROC Curve , Prognosis , Transcriptome , Radiomics
15.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 69, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717476

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of tumor size on survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. METHODS: Early-onset colon and rectal cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Tumor size was analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables. Several statistical techniques, including restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox proportional hazard model, subgroup analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed to demonstrate the association between tumor size and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset colon and rectal cancer. RESULTS: Seventeen thousand five hundred fifty-one (76.7%) early-onset colon and 5323 (23.3%) rectal cancer patients were included. RCS analysis confirmed a linear association between tumor size and survival. Patients with a tumor size > 5 cm had worse OS and CSS, compared to those with a tumor size ≤ 5 cm for both early-onset colon and rectal cancer. Notably, subgroup analysis showed that a smaller tumor size (≤ 50 mm) was associated with worse survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer, although not statistically significant. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the survival of patients with tumor size ≤ 50 mm was better than that of patients with tumor size > 50 mm. CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors larger than 5 cm were associated with worse survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. However, smaller tumor size may indicate a more biologically aggressive phenotype, correlating with poorer survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer.


Age of Onset , Colonic Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Tumor Burden , Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , SEER Program , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Aged
16.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 95, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717497

The prognostication of survival trajectories in multiple myeloma (MM) patients presents a substantial clinical challenge. Leveraging transcriptomic and clinical profiles from an expansive cohort of 2,088 MM patients, sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas repositories, we applied a sophisticated nested lasso regression technique to construct a prognostic model predicated on 28 gene pairings intrinsic to cell death pathways, thereby deriving a quantifiable risk stratification metric. Employing a threshold of 0.15, we dichotomized the MM samples into discrete high-risk and low-risk categories. Notably, the delineated high-risk cohort exhibited a statistically significant diminution in survival duration, a finding which consistently replicated across both training and external validation datasets. The prognostic acumen of our cell death signature was further corroborated by TIME ROC analyses, with the model demonstrating robust performance, evidenced by AUC metrics consistently surpassing the 0.6 benchmark across the evaluated arrays. Further analytical rigor was applied through multivariate COX regression analyses, which ratified the cell death risk model as an independent prognostic determinant. In an innovative stratagem, we amalgamated this risk stratification with the established International Staging System (ISS), culminating in the genesis of a novel, refined ISS categorization. This tripartite classification system was subjected to comparative analysis against extant prognostic models, whereupon it manifested superior predictive precision, as reflected by an elevated C-index. In summation, our endeavors have yielded a clinically viable gene pairing model predicated on cellular mortality, which, when synthesized with the ISS, engenders an augmented prognostic tool that exhibits pronounced predictive prowess in the context of multiple myeloma.


Cell Death , Multiple Myeloma , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Humans , Prognosis , Male , Female , Risk Assessment , Gene Expression Profiling , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Aged , Survival Analysis
17.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 156, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720257

BACKGROUND: Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Esophagus (MECE) is a relatively rare tumor type, with most of the current data derived from case reports or small sample studies. This retrospective study reports on the 10-year survival data and detailed clinicopathological characteristics of 48 patients with esophageal MEC. METHODS: Data were collected from 48 patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal MEC at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. These were compared with contemporaneous cases of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis, we investigated the clinicopathological factors affecting the survival of patients with MEC. RESULTS: The incidence of MECE was predominantly higher in males, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 7:1. The mid-thoracic segment emerged as the most common site of occurrence. A mere 6.3% of cases were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. The lymph node metastasis rate stood at 35.4%. The overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 85.4%, 52.1%, 37.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. Post 1:1 propensity score matching, no significant statistical difference was observed in the Overall Survival (OS) between MEC patients and those with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) (P = 0.119, P = 0.669). Univariate analysis indicated that T staging and N staging were the primary factors influencing the prognosis of esophageal MEC. CONCLUSIONS: MECE occurs more frequently in males than females, with the mid-thoracic segment being the most common site of occurrence. The rate of accurate preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is low. The characteristic of having a short lesion length yet exhibiting significant extramural invasion may be a crucial clinicopathological feature of MECE. The OS of patients with MEC does not appear to significantly differ from those with esophageal squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.


Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Male , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid/pathology , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid/mortality , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid/surgery , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Survival Rate , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Prognosis , Sex Factors , Neoplasm Staging
18.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 140, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720305

BACKGROUND: We investigated the real-world efficacy of adjuvant therapy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with pathological high-risk factors. METHODS: Study participants were enrolled from November 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Clinical bias was balanced by propensity score matching. Disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify survival-associated factors. p ≤ 0.05 was the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients, among whom 134 (29.5%) underwent adjuvant therapy, were enrolled in this study. One hundred and eighteen of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were well matched with non-treatment patients. Prognostic outcomes of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the non-treatment group, as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis after PSM. Differences in prevention of recurrence or metastasis between the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups were insignificant. Adjuvant therapy was found to be positive prognostic factors, tumor size and solid growth patterns were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy significantly improved the DFS for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with high-risk factors. Larger prospective clinical trials should be performed to verify our findings.


Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Male , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/surgery , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/therapy , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Pneumonectomy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Prognosis , Kaplan-Meier Estimate
19.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(7): 120, 2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713243

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a real-world multicenter retrospective study on patients with stage III NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between October 2018 and December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine potential prognostic factors. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to further minimize confounding. RESULTS: A total of 239 eligible patients were enrolled, with 104 (43.5%) receiving surgery and 135 (56.5%) receiving CRT. After 1:1 PSM, 1- and 2-year PFS rates in patients receiving radical surgery (rSurgery group) vs. patients receiving definitive cCRT (dCCRT group) were 80.0% vs. 79.2% and 67.2% vs. 53.1%, respectively (P = 0.774). One- and 2-year OS rates were 97.5% vs. 97.4% and 87.3% vs. 89.9%, respectively (P = 0.558). Patients in the dCCRT group had a numerically lower incidence of distant metastases compared to those in the rSurgery group (42.9% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.119). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups, except that the incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was significantly higher in the dCCRT group (30.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy may achieve noninferior outcomes to radical surgery in stage III NSCLC.


Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Chemoradiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Aged , Immunotherapy/methods , Adult , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
20.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(7): 116, 2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713408

OBJECTIVES: Nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for resected stage III/IV melanoma based on the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial. This analysis compared outcomes from CheckMate 238 with those from the real-world Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab. MATERIALS: Outcomes included baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS) in the CheckMate 238 cohort (randomization until death or last known alive), and real-world overall survival (rwOS) in the Flatiron Health cohort (nivolumab initiation until death or data cutoff). rwOS was compared with OS using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was combined with the adjusted model to reduce baseline discrepancies. RESULTS: The CheckMate 238 and real-world cohorts included 369 and 452 patients, respectively (median age, 56.0 and 63.0 years; median follow-up, 61.4 vs. 25.5 months). rwOS was not different from OS in the unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% CI 0.92-1.74), adjusted (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.67-1.54), and adjusted IPTW (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.63) analyses. In the adjusted analysis, 2-year OS and rwOS rates were 84%. Median OS and rwOS were not reached. After IPTW, OS and rwOS were not different (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative analysis, OS in the CheckMate 238 trial was similar to rwOS in the Flatiron Health database after adjustments in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab, validating the trial results.


Melanoma , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Aged , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Adult
...