Novel strategies in HPV­16­related cervical cancer treatment: An in vitro study of combined siRNA-E5 with oxaliplatin and ifosfamide chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer, primarily caused by HPV infection, remains a global health concern. Current treatments face challenges including drug resistance and toxicity. This study investigates combining E5-siRNA with chemotherapy drugs, Oxaliplatin and Ifosfamide, to enhance treatment efficacy in HPV-16 positive cervical cancer cells, targeting E5 oncoprotein to overcome limitations of existing therapies. METHODS: The CaSki cervical cancer cell line was transfected with E5-siRNA, and subsequently treated with Oxaliplatin/Ifosfamide. Quantitative real-time PCR was employed to assess the expression of related genes including p53, MMP2, Nanog, and Caspases. Cell apoptosis, cell cycle progression, and cell viability were evaluated using Annexin V/PI staining, DAPI staining, and MTT test, respectively. Furthermore, stemness ability was determined through a colony formation assay, and cell motility was assessed by wound healing assay. RESULTS: E5-siRNA transfection significantly reduced E5 mRNA expression in CaSki cells compared to the control group. The MTT assay revealed that monotherapy with E5-siRNA, Oxaliplatin, or Ifosfamide had moderate effects on cell viability. However, combination therapy showed synergistic effects, reducing the IC50 of Oxaliplatin from 11.42 × 10-8 M (45.36 µg/ml) to 6.71 × 10-8 M (26.66 µg/ml) and Ifosfamide from 12.52 × 10-5 M (32.7 µg/ml) to 8.206 × 10-5 M (21.43 µg/ml). Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated a significant increase in apoptosis for combination treatments, with apoptosis rates rising from 11.02 % (Oxaliplatin alone) and 16.98 % (Ifosfamide alone) to 24.8 % (Oxaliplatin + E5-siRNA) and 34.9 % (Ifosfamide + E5-siRNA). The sub-G1 cell population increased from 15.7 % (Oxaliplatin alone) and 18 % (Ifosfamide alone) to 21.9 % (Oxaliplatin + E5-siRNA) and 27.1 % (Ifosfamide + E5-siRNA), indicating cell cycle arrest. The colony formation assay revealed a substantial decrease in the number of colonies following combination treatment. qRT-PCR analysis showed decreased expression of stemness-related genes CD44 and Nanog, and migration-related genes MMP2 and CXCL8 in the combination groups. Apoptosis-related genes Casp-3, Casp-9, and pP53 showed increased expression following combination therapy, while BAX expression increased and BCL2 expression decreased relative to the control. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that combining E5-siRNA with Oxaliplatin or Ifosfamide enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy in HPV-16 positive cervical cancer cells. This synergistic approach effectively targets multiple aspects of cancer cell behavior, including proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and stemness. The findings suggest that this combination strategy could potentially allow for lower chemotherapy doses, thereby reducing toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This research provides valuable insights into targeting HPV E5 as a complementary approach to existing therapies focused on E6 and E7 oncoproteins, opening new avenues for combination therapies in cervical cancer treatment.

Tubeimoside-I, an inhibitor of HSPD1, enhances cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin by activating ER stress and MAPK signaling pathways in colorectal cancer.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Tubeimoside-I (TBM) promotes various cancer cell death by increasing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. However, the specific molecular mechanisms of TBM and its impact on oxaliplatin-mediated anti-CRC activity are not yet fully understood. AIM OF THE STUDY: To elucidate the therapeutic effect and underlying molecular mechanism of TBM on oxaliplatin-mediated anti-CRC activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), colony formation, wound healing assays and flow cytometry were conducted to investigate the changes in cell phenotypes and ROS generation. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting were performed to detect the expressions of related mRNA and proteins. Finally, mouse xenograft models demonstrated that synergistic anti-tumor effects of combined treatment with TBM and oxaliplatin. RESULTS: The synergistic enhancement of the anti-tumor effects of oxaliplatin in colon cancer cells by TBM involved in the regulation of ROS-mediated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, C-jun-amino-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. Mechanistically, TBM increased ROS generation in colon cancer cells by inhibiting heat shock protein 60 (HSPD1) expression. Knocking down HSPD1 increased TBM-induced antitumor activity and ROS generation in colon cancer cells. The mouse xenograft tumor models further validated that the combination therapy exhibited stronger anti-tumor effects than monotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with TBM and oxaliplatin might be an effective therapeutic strategy for some CRC patients.

HMGB2-induced calreticulin translocation required for immunogenic cell death and ferroptosis of cancer cells are controlled by the nuclear exporter XPO1.

Cisplatin and oxaliplatin cause the secretion of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein from cancer cells, which is necessary for initiation of immunogenic cell death (ICD). Calreticulin (CRT) translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane is also required; oxaliplatin induces this translocation but cisplatin does not. We have discovered that oxaliplatin causes the secretion of both HMGB1 and HMGB2 from the cell nucleus into the extracellular milieu. We previously showed that cisplatin-mediated secretion of HMGB1 is controlled by the nuclear exporter XPO1 (chromosomal maintenance 1; CRM1). We now find that XPO1 regulates oxaliplatin-mediated secretion of both HMGB1 and HMGB2. XPO1 inhibition causes nuclear accumulation of both proteins, inhibition of oxaliplatin-mediated ferroptosis of colon cancer cells, and inhibition of CRT translocation to the plasma membrane of lung and colon cancer cells. Incubation of cancer cells with cell targeted (CT)-HMGB2 confirmed that HMGB2 is required for the CRT translocation. Furthermore, CT-HMGB2 is three orders of magnitude more potent at inducing CRT translocation than oxaliplatin.

Expression of MxA in esophageal cancer cell lines can influence sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents but this does not require apoptosis.

Esophageal cancer is a poor prognosis cancer characterized by intrinsic or acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. The primary determinants of treatment failure are unknown. Expression of an anti-viral protein, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is de-regulated in many cancers, including esophageal cancer, and its activity has been linked to apoptosis. This study has assessed whether MxA expression can influence the response of esophageal cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or oxaliplatin. MxA protein was differentially expressed in a panel of five esophageal cancer cell lines. KYSE450 and KYSE140 cells did not express MxA and were apoptosis incompetent. FLO-1, KYSE270, and OE21 cells expressed MxA, were more drug-sensitive and were apoptosis competent. MxA was artificially overexpressed in cell lines with no endogenous expression (KYSE450 and KYSE140). This increased the resistance of KYSE450 but not KYSE140 cells. Both cell lines remained apoptosis incompetent. We then evaluated siRNA knockdown of MxA in FLO-1 cells and CRISPR knockout in OE21 cells. Knockdown of MxA significantly increased drug sensitivity and caspase-3 activation in FLO-1 cells. OE21-MX1KO cells were also more drug-sensitive, but in contrast to FLO-1 cells, caspase-3 activation was reduced. Collectively these data indicate that MxA can promote resistance to chemotherapy, but this does not always correspond with effects on apoptosis. Effects on apoptosis are cell line specific, suggesting that other co-operating pathways determine the overall impact of MxA. Importantly, in cancer cells that overexpress the protein, drug sensitivity can be improved by interfering with MxA.

Phase I PIANO trial-PIPAC-oxaliplatin and systemic nivolumab combination for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases: clinical and translational outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy-oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) induces direct DNA damage and immunogenic cell death in patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases (GCPM). Combining PIPAC-OX with immune checkpoint inhibition remains untested. We conducted a phase I first-in-human trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of PIPAC-OX combined with systemic nivolumab (NCT03172416). METHODS: Patients with GCPM who experienced disease progression on at least first-line systemic therapy were recruited across three centers in Singapore and Belgium. Patients received PIPAC-OX at 90 mg/m2 every 6 weeks and i.v. nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Translational studies were carried out on GCPM samples acquired during PIPAC-OX procedures. RESULTS: In total, 18 patients with GCPM were prospectively recruited. The PIPAC-OX and nivolumab combination was well tolerated with manageable treatment-related adverse events, although one patient suffered from grade 4 vomiting. At second and third PIPAC-OX, respectively, the median decrease in peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was -5 (interquartile range: -12 to +1) and -7 (interquartile range: -6 to -20) and peritoneal regression grade 1 or 2 was observed in 66.7% (6/9) and 100% (3/3). Translational analyses of 43 GCPM samples revealed enrichment of immune/stromal infiltration and inflammatory signatures in peritoneal tumors after PIPAC-OX and nivolumab. M2 macrophages were reduced in treated peritoneal tumor samples while memory CD4+, CD8+ central memory and naive CD8+ T-cells were increased. CONCLUSIONS: The first-in-human trial combining PIPAC-OX and nivolumab demonstrated safety and tolerability, coupled with enhanced T-cell infiltration within peritoneal tumors. This trial sets the stage for future combinations of systemic immunotherapy with locoregional intraperitoneal treatments.

UBR5 mediates colorectal cancer chemoresistance by attenuating ferroptosis via Lys 11 ubiquitin-dependent stabilization of Smad3-SLC7A11 signaling.

Chemoresistance remains a principal culprit for the treatment failure in colorectal cancer (CRC), especially for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. Deciphering the molecular basis of chemoresistance may lead to novel therapeutic strategies for this fatal disease. Here, UBR5, an E3 ubiquitin ligase frequently overexpressed in human CRC, is demonstrated to mediate chemoresistance principally by inhibiting ferroptosis. Paradoxically, UBR5 shields oxaliplatin-activated Smad3 from proteasome-dependent degradation via Lys 11-linked polyubiquitination. This novel chemical modification of Smad3 facilitates the transcriptional repression of ATF3, induction of SLC7A11 and inhibition of ferroptosis, contributing to chemoresistance. Consequently, targeting UBR5 in combination with a ferroptosis inducer synergistically sensitizes CRC to oxaliplatin-induced cell death and control of tumor growth. This study reveals, for the first time, a major clinically relevant chemoresistance mechanism in CRC mediated by UBR5 in sustaining TGFß-Smad3 signaling and tuning ferroptosis, unveiling its potential as a viable therapeutic target for chemosensitization.

Calreticulin exposure induced by anticancer drugs is associated with the p53 signaling pathway in colorectal cancer cells.

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) enhances immunogenicity and activates antitumor immune responses. ICD induction by anticancer drugs may be effective against microsatellite-stable colorectal cancers (CRCs) that are less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Calreticulin (CRT) is crucial in ICD, promoting dendritic cell phagocytosis and initiating antitumor immunity. This study investigated CRT exposure mechanisms in four CRC cell lines and three human CRC organoids. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence showed that oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil caused CRT exposure in all models. Despite CRT's association with endoplasmic reticulum stress, Western blot analysis showed no increase in this stress. These findings suggest alternative pathways. RNA sequencing identified enrichment of p53 signaling pathway genes, including TP53I3, TP53INP1, and YPEL3, which were confirmed by RT-qPCR. These results suggest that the p53 signaling pathway plays an important role in CRT exposure induced by anticancer drugs.

An exploratory clinical study of ß-glucan combined with camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Background: ß-glucan has been reported to be a potential natural immune modulator for tumor growth inhibition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ß-glucan plus immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a phase IB, prospective, single-arm, investigator-initiated trail. Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients received ß-glucan, camrelizumab, oxaliplatin, oral S-1 every 3 weeks. The curative effect was evaluated every 2 cycles. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). The exploratory endpoint explored biomarkers of response to treatment efficacy. Results: A total of 30 patients had been enrolled, including 20 (66.7%) males and all patients with an ECOG PS score of ≥1. The ORR was 60%, the mPFS was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.52-11.27), the mOS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.09-16.91). A total of 19 patients (63.3%) had TRAEs, with 9 patients (30%) with grade ≥ 3. The most common TRAEs were nausea (53.3%). After 2 cycles of treatment, the levels of IL-2, IFN-γ and CD4+ T cells significantly increased (P < 0.05). Furthermore, biomarker analysis indicated that patient with better response and longer OS exhibited lower GZMA expression at baseline serum. Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates that ß-glucan plus camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy offers favorable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, and further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100044088.

Dorsal root ganglion inflammation by oxaliplatin toxicity: DPEP1 as possible target for peripheral neuropathy prevention.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) constitutes a dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin chemotherapy that often compromises the efficacy of antineoplastic treatments. Sensory neurons damage in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are the cellular substrate of PN complex molecular origin. Dehydropeptidase-1 (DPEP1) inhibitors have shown to avoid platin-induced nephrotoxicity without compromising its anticancer efficiency. The objective of this study was to describe DPEP1 expression in rat DRG in health and in early stages of oxaliplatin toxicity. To this end, we produced and characterized anti-DPEP1 polyclonal antibodies and used them to define the expression, and cellular and subcellular localization of DPEP1 by immunohistochemical confocal microscopy studies in healthy controls and short term (six days) oxaliplatin treated rats. RESULTS: DPEP1 is expressed mostly in neurons and in glia, and to a lesser extent in endothelial cells. Rats undergoing oxaliplatin treatment developed allodynia. TNF-𝛼 expression in DRG revealed a pattern of focal and at different intensity levels of neural cell inflammatory damage, accompanied by slight variations in DPEP1 expression in endothelial cells and in nuclei of neurons. CONCLUSIONS: DPEP1 is expressed in neurons, glia and endothelial cells of DRG. Oxaliplatin caused allodynia in rats and increased TNF-α expression in DRG neurons. The expression of DPEP1 in neurons and other cells of DRG suggest this protein as a novel strategic molecular target in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a comparative analysis of different perfusion chemotherapeutic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) commonly occurs in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment for patients with PLC and PVTT. Some studies have shown that combining TACE therapy with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might improve the survival rate of PLC patients with PVTT. However, few studies have compared the different regimens of PLC with PVTT. We aimed to compare the differences between the oxaliplatin + raltetrexed regimen and FOLFOX regimen. METHODS: We divided the 248 patients into two groups. There were 60 patients in the oxaliplatin + ratitetrexed group and 74 patients in the FOLFOX group. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were ORR and adverse events. We used SPSS software, the Kaplan-Meier method, the t test, and the rank sum test to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The median OS was 10.82 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 8.67 months in the FOLFOX group. The median PFS time was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group (10.0 months) than that in the FOLFOX group (7.1 months). The ORR was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group than that in the FOLFOX group (18.3% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.445). The DCR in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group was higher than that in the FOLFOX group (70.0% vs. 64.8%; P = 0.529). However, in the subgroup analysis, the difference between them was more significant in the type II PVTT subgroup. The OS was 12.08 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 7.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.008). The PFS was 11.68 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.014). In the right branch of type II PVTT, the OS was 13.54 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.89 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.015), and the PFS was 13.35 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.27 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.030). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FOLFOX regimen, the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed chemoembolization regimen had longer OS, PFS time and ORR and DCR and it was safe and tolerable.

Role of TRPA1 in Painful Cold Hypersensitivity.

Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is a polymodal cation channel that plays a pivotal role in pain generation after exposure to irritant chemicals and is involved in the sensation of a wide variety of pathological pain. TRPA1 was first reported to be sensitive to noxious cold, but its intrinsic cold sensitivity still remains under debate. To address this issue, we focused on cold hypersensitivity induced by oxaliplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug, as a peculiar adverse symptom of acute peripheral neuropathy. We and other groups have shown that oxaliplatin enhances TRPA1 sensitivity to its chemical agonists and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Our in vitro and animal model studies revealed that oxaliplatin, or its metabolite oxalate, inhibits hydroxylation of a proline residue within the N-terminus of human TRPA1 (hTRPA1) via inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein (PHD), which induces TRPA1 sensitization to ROS. Although hTRPA1 is insensitive to cold, PHD inhibition endows hTRPA1 with cold sensitivity through sensing the small amount of ROS produced after exposure to cold. Hence, we propose that PHD inhibition can unveil the cold sensitivity of hTRPA1 by converting ROS signaling into cold sensitivity. Furthermore, in this review, we summarize the role of TRPA1 in painful cold hypersensitivity during peripheral vascular impairment.

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy with hepatic arterial versus intravenous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, a major drug in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is responsible for cumulative, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN). Whether the hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) route can limit oxaliplatin-induced PN in comparison with the intravenous (IV) route has not been specifically explored so far. METHODS: We compared the frequency and severity of PN in oxaliplatin-naive patients with mCRC included in trials that evaluated treatment with oxaliplatin administered either by HAI (ACCORD 04, CHOICE, OSCAR, and PACHA-01 trials) or by IV route (FFCD 2000-05 trial). We retrieved anonymized, prospectively collected data from trial databases for the ACCORD 04, CHOICE, and FFCD 2000-05 trials and through a review of Gustave Roussy patients' electronic medical records for PACHA-01 and OSCAR trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically significant PN (grades 2 to 4) according to the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received. Secondary endpoints were time to onset of neuropathy as a function of the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin, discontinuation of oxaliplatin for neurotoxicity, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were included (IV, 300; HAI, 63). In total, 180 patients in the IV group (60%) and 30 patients in the HAI group (48%) developed clinically significant PN, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.23). No difference was shown in the time to onset of PN either (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The administration of oxaliplatin HAI rather than IV in the treatment of mCRC does not reduce the incidence, precocity, and severity of PN.

YTHDF2 in peritumoral hepatocytes mediates chemotherapy-induced antitumor immune responses through CX3CL1-mediated CD8+ T cell recruitment.

Peritumoral hepatocytes are critical components of the liver cancer microenvironment, However, the role of peritumoral hepatocytes in the local tumor immune interface and the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been elucidated. YTHDF2, an RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) reader, is critical for liver tumor progression. The function and regulatory roles of YTHDF2 in peritumoral hepatocytes are unknown. This study demonstrated that oxaliplatin (OXA) upregulated m6A modification and YTHDF2 expression in hepatocytes. Studies using tumor-bearing liver-specific Ythdf2 knockout mice revealed that hepatocyte YTHDF2 suppresses liver tumor growth through CD8+ T cell recruitment and activation. Additionally, YTHDF2 mediated the response to immunotherapy. Mechanistically, OXA upregulated YTHDF2 expression by activating the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and consequently enhanced the therapeutic outcomes of immunotherapeutic interventions. Ythdf2 stabilized Cx3cl1 transcripts in an m6A-dependent manner, regulating the interplay between CD8+ T cells and the progression of liver malignancies. Thus, this study elucidated the novel role of hepatocyte YTHDF2, which promotes therapy-induced antitumor immune responses in the liver. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefits of targeting YTHDF2.

Phase 1b study of first-line fuzuloparib combined with modified FOLFIRINOX followed by fuzuloparib maintenance monotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but with limited efficacy. We aimed to explore the feasibility of adding the PARP inhibitor fuzuloparib to mFOLFIRINOX in the locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) setting. METHODS: This was the dose-escalation and -expansion, phase 1b portion of a phase 1b/2 study. Patients were given oral fuzuloparib at escalating doses starting at 30 mg twice daily (BID) plus intravenous mFOLFIRINOX q2w for 8-12 cycles, followed by maintenance fuzuloparib at 150 mg BID. Cohorts at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and lower dose of fuzuloparib were expanded. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: As of data cutoff on Jan 15, 2023, 39 patients were recruited. 12 patients were enrolled during dose escalation (30 mg [n = 4]; 60 mg [n = 6]; 100 mg [n = 2]). DLT occurred in 1 patient in 60 mg cohort and 1 patient in 100 mg cohort. 60 mg BID was determined to be the MTD, and then 60 and 30 mg cohorts were expanded to 22 and 15 patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were hematologic toxicities. Efficacy in 60 mg cohort seemed to be most favorable, with an objective response rate of 50.0% (95% CI, 26.0-74.0) and disease control rate of 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9). CONCLUSIONS: First-line fuzuloparib plus mFOLFIRINOX followed by maintenance fuzuloparib was generally safe and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with LA/M pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The RP2D of fuzuloparib combination was 60 mg BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04228601.

Oxaliplatin activates P53/miR-34a/survivin axis in inhibiting the progression of gastric cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to determine how the P53/microRNA-34a (miR-34a)/survivin pathway contributes to oxaliplatin-induced (L-OHP) cell inhibition in gastric cancer. METHODS: The BGC-823 gastric cancer cells were selected, and we examined their viability following treatment with L-OHP at different concentrations and time periods. The expression levels of miR-34a, P53, and survivin in the cells were determined. RESULTS: In the 12- and 24-h groups, drug concentration of 15 µg/cm² (p < .005 in both) significantly lowered cell viability. In comparison to the control group, miR-34a mRNA expression, P53 mRNA expression, and protein expression were all significantly greater in the 24-h group (p = .0324, p = .0069, p = .0260, respectively), but survivin mRNA and protein expressions were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = .0338, p = .0032, respectively). There was a significant decrease in gastric cancer cells in the miR-34a overexpression group (p = .0020), a significant increase in P53 mRNA and protein expression compared to the control group (p = .0080, p = .0121, respectively), and a significant decrease in survivin mRNA and protein expression compared to the control group. (p = .0213, p = .0069, respectively). CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin inhibits tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis by upregulating miR-34a, activating the expression of the upstream P53 gene, and driving the downregulation of survivin (P53/miR-34a/survivin axis) in BGC-823 gastric cancer cells.

Clinico-biological factors predicting the benefit of the LV5FU2 maintenance strategy as a first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Predictive markers of LV5FU2 maintenance benefit after first-line induction with FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are necessary to select patients who will not be harmed by this strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We focused on patients who received 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (arm A, N = 88) or 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX followed by LV5FU2 maintenance in controlled patients (arm B, N = 91) from the PRODIGE-35 trial. Prognostic factors and predictors of efficiency were identified by using Cox regression. Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to deterioration of quality of life (TTD-QoL) were evaluated. RESULTS: Poor independent prognostic factors were primary tumor in place, age <65 years and the presence of liver metastases for PFS, a baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 and CA19.9 ≥500 UI/L for OS, independent of the treatment arm. Patients with one metastatic site had a longer PFS in arm A, whereas patients with ≥2 metastatic sites had a longer PFS in arm B. We also identified predictors of OS and TTD-QoL in arm B but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Except for patients with one metastatic site who benefited more from 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, a maintenance strategy with LV5FU2 should be widely offered to mPC patients whose survival and QoL are preserved after 4 months of FOLFIRINOX. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02352337).

Sintilimab plus GemOx is an effective salvage therapy in patients with refractory/relapsing nodal peripheral T cell lymphomas.

PURPOSE: The retrospective study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of GemOx (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin) plus sintilimab (belongs to the class of drugs known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly targeting the PD-1 receptor) in relapse or refractory nodal PTCLs. METHODS: Patients with nodal PTCL who initiated salvage therapy with sintilimab and GemOx between January 2020 to September 2021 were identified from the database of the hematology department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. All patients received 2-4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of treatment of sintilimab (200 mg, I.V, D1) in combination with GemOx. Treatment response was assessed every six weeks during the salvage treatment phase. Eligible patients received maintenance therapy according to the investigator's decision. Follow-ups were routinely conducted every three months. RESULTS: 31 patients with r/r nodal PTCLs were enrolled, including 23 PTCL-NOS, 4 AITL, and 4 ALCL. 21 (67.7%) patients received at least two lines of therapy. 71.0% (95% CI, 53.4%-83.9%) of patients documented objective response of 2-4 cycles of sintilimab plus GemOx therapy, including 9 complete response and 13 partial response. 21 (67.7%) patients received consolidation therapy, including 5 autologous stem-cell transplantation and 12 histone deacetylase inhibitors. After a median 25.6 months follow-up, the median PFS was 22.0 (95% CI,11.8-24.7) months, and the median OS was 26.2 (95% CI, 24.4 -NA) months. 29 (93.5%) patients experienced at least one adverse event, and 26 (83.9% patients only had mild (grade 1-2) AEs.Univariable Cox regression showed the progression risk of AITL is 22.7 (3.9- 131.0, p < 0.01) times of PTCL-NOS, while the HR of ALCL was 1.14 (0.33-3.96,p = 0.833). CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus GemOx showed encouraging activity and manageable toxicity for patients with r/r PTCL.

Sequential vs. concurrent systemic therapies in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center, real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tri-combination therapy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of infusion fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-HAIC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have been proven effective. However, whether it was best for these HCC patients to start with the most potent therapeutic pattern was still under debate. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC combined with systemic therapies in the patterns of sequential and concurrent schedules. METHODS: This real-world study included 117 unresectable HCC patients who initially received either FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group, n = 44) or concurrent ICIs and TKIs (ConHAIC group, n = 73) from March 2020 and June 2022, during the period of FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy in HAIC group, patients in the HAIC group (n = 30) experienced progressive disease (PD) would have their treatment pattern converted from the FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy to the combination of FOLFOX-HAIC plus ICIs and TKIs sequentially (SeqHAIC group). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, were compared between patients in the SeqHAIC and ConHAIC groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the SeqHAIC group was 24.92 months (95% CI, 12.74-37.09 months) and of the ConHAIC group was 17.87 months (95% CI, 16.85-18.89 months) and no significant difference was observed in both PFS (HR, 1.572; 95% CI, 0.848-2.916; p = 0.151) and OS (HR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.574-2.561; p = 0.614) between the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups. As for the tumor responses, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding tumor responses, overall response rates (p = 0.658) and disease control rates (p = 0.641) were 50.0%, 45.2%, and 83.3%, 89.0% for the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that sequential systemic ICIs and TKIs in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC provides similar long-term prognosis and better tolerability compared to concurrent therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.

Collagen type I PET/MRI enables evaluation of treatment response in pancreatic cancer in pre-clinical and first-in-human translational studies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an invasive and rapidly progressive malignancy. A major challenge in patient management is the lack of a reliable imaging tool to monitor tumor response to treatment. Tumor-associated fibrosis characterized by high type I collagen is a hallmark of PDAC, and fibrosis further increases in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We hypothesized that molecular positron emission tomography (PET) using a type I collagen-specific imaging probe, 68Ga-CBP8 can detect and measure changes in tumor fibrosis in response to standard treatment in mouse models and patients with PDAC. Methods: We evaluated the specificity of 68Ga-CBP8 PET to tumor collagen and its ability to differentiate responders from non-responders based on the dynamic changes of fibrosis in nude mouse models of human PDAC including FOLFIRNOX-sensitive (PANC-1 and PDAC6) and FOLFIRINOX-resistant (SU.86.86). Next, we demonstrated the specificity and sensitivity of 68Ga-CBP8 to the deposited collagen in resected human PDAC and pancreas tissues. Eight male participant (49-65 y) with newly diagnosed PDAC underwent dynamic 68Ga-CBP8 PET/MRI, and five underwent follow up 68Ga-CBP8 PET/MRI after completing standard CRT. PET parameters were correlated with tumor collagen content and markers of response on histology. Results: 68Ga-CBP8 showed specific binding to PDAC compared to non-binding 68Ga-CNBP probe in two mouse models of PDAC using PET imaging and to resected human PDAC using autoradiography (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). 68Ga-CBP8 PET showed 2-fold higher tumor signal in mouse models following FOLFIRINOX treatment in PANC-1 and PDAC6 models (P < 0.01), but no significant increase after treatment in FOLFIRINOX resistant SU.86.86 model. 68Ga-CBP8 binding to resected human PDAC was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in treated versus untreated tissue. PET/MRI of PDAC patients prior to CRT showed significantly higher 68Ga-CBP8 uptake in tumor compared to pancreas (SUVmean: 2.35 ± 0.36 vs. 1.99 ± 0.25, P = 0.036, n = 8). PET tumor values significantly increased following CRT compared to untreated tumors (SUVmean: 2.83 ± 0.30 vs. 2.25 ± 0.41, P = 0.01, n = 5). Collagen deposition significantly increased in response to CRT (59 ± 9% vs. 30 ± 9%, P=0.0005 in treated vs. untreated tumors). Tumor and pancreas collagen content showed a positive direct correlation with SUVmean (R2 = 0.54, P = 0.0007). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the specificity of 68Ga-CBP8 PET to tumor type I collagen and its ability to differentiate responders from non-responders based on the dynamic changes of fibrosis in PDAC. The results highlight the potential use of collagen PET as a non-invasive tool for monitoring response to treatment in patients with PDAC.