Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.302
Filter
1.
eNeuro ; 11(6)2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834298

ABSTRACT

In the rodent whisker system, active sensing and sensorimotor integration are mediated in part by the dynamic interactions between the motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (S1). However, understanding these dynamic interactions requires knowledge about the synapses and how specific neurons respond to their input. Here, we combined optogenetics, retrograde labeling, and electrophysiology to characterize the synaptic connections between M1 and layer 5 (L5) intratelencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) neurons in S1 of mice (both sexes). We found that M1 synapses onto IT cells displayed modest short-term depression, whereas synapses onto PT neurons showed robust short-term facilitation. Despite M1 inputs to IT cells depressing, their slower kinetics resulted in summation and a response that increased during short trains. In contrast, summation was minimal in PT neurons due to the fast time course of their M1 responses. The functional consequences of this reduced summation, however, were outweighed by the strong facilitation at these M1 synapses, resulting in larger response amplitudes in PT neurons than IT cells during repetitive stimulation. To understand the impact of facilitating M1 inputs on PT output, we paired trains of inputs with single backpropagating action potentials, finding that repetitive M1 activation increased the probability of bursts in PT cells without impacting the time dependence of this coupling. Thus, there are two parallel but dynamically distinct systems of M1 synaptic excitation in L5 of S1, each defined by the short-term dynamics of its synapses, the class of postsynaptic neurons, and how the neurons respond to those inputs.


Subject(s)
Motor Cortex , Optogenetics , Somatosensory Cortex , Animals , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Male , Female , Neural Pathways/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Mice , Neurons/physiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Vibrissae/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Mice, Transgenic , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology
2.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e943748, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND This study embarked on an innovative exploration to elucidate the effects of integrating electroacupuncture (EA) with motor training (MT) on enhancing corticospinal excitability and motor learning. Central to this investigation is the interplay between homeostatic and non-homeostatic metaplasticity processes, providing insights into how these combined interventions may influence neural plasticity and motor skill acquisition. MATERIAL AND METHODS The investigation enrolled 20 healthy volunteers, subjecting them to 4 distinct interventions to parse out the individual and combined effects of EA and MT. These interventions were EA alone, MT alone, EA-priming followed by MT, and MT-priming followed by EA. The assessment of changes in primary motor cortex (M1) excitability was conducted through motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), while the grooved pegboard test (GPT) was used to evaluate alterations in motor performance. RESULTS The findings revealed that EA and MT independently contributed to enhanced M1 excitability and motor performance. However, the additional priming with EA or MT did not yield further modulation in MEPs amplitudes. Notably, EA-priming was associated with improved GPT completion times, underscoring its potential in facilitating motor learning. CONCLUSIONS The study underscores that while EA and MT individually augment motor cortex excitability and performance, their synergistic application does not further enhance or inhibit cortical excitability. This points to the involvement of non-homeostatic metaplasticity mechanisms. Nonetheless, EA emerges as a critical tool in preventing M1 overstimulation, thereby continuously fostering motor learning. The findings call for further research into the strategic application of EA, whether in isolation or with MT, within clinical settings to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.


Subject(s)
Electroacupuncture , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Healthy Volunteers , Learning , Motor Cortex , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Electroacupuncture/methods , Male , Motor Cortex/physiology , Learning/physiology , Female , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Adult , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Young Adult , Motor Skills/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology
3.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5126, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879614

ABSTRACT

Motor learning relies on experience-dependent plasticity in relevant neural circuits. In four experiments, we provide initial evidence and a double-blinded, sham-controlled replication (Experiment I-II) demonstrating that motor learning involving ballistic index finger movements is improved by preceding paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS), a human model for exogenous induction of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Behavioral effects of PCMS targeting corticomotoneuronal (CM) synapses are order- and timing-specific and partially bidirectional (Experiment III). PCMS with a 2 ms inter-arrival interval at CM-synapses enhances learning and increases corticospinal excitability compared to control protocols. Unpaired stimulations did not increase corticospinal excitability (Experiment IV). Our findings demonstrate that non-invasively induced plasticity interacts positively with experience-dependent plasticity to promote motor learning. The effects of PCMS on motor learning approximate Hebbian learning rules, while the effects on corticospinal excitability demonstrate timing-specificity but not bidirectionality. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale to enhance motor practice effects by priming sensorimotor training with individualized PCMS.


Subject(s)
Learning , Motor Neurons , Neuronal Plasticity , Humans , Male , Learning/physiology , Female , Adult , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Young Adult , Motor Neurons/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Double-Blind Method , Motor Cortex/physiology , Fingers/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Synapses/physiology
4.
Cereb Cortex ; 34(6)2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879808

ABSTRACT

Navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation is a non-invasive and safe brain activity modulation technique. When combined with the classical rehabilitation process in stroke patients it has the potential to enhance the overall neurologic recovery. We present a case of a peri-operative stroke, treated with ultra-early low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation over the contralesional hemisphere. The patient received low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation within 12 hours of stroke onset for seven consecutive days and a significant improvement in his right sided weakness was noticed and he was discharge with normal power. This was accompanied by an increase in the number of positive responses evoked by navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation and a decrease of the resting motor thresholds at a cortical level. Subcortically, a decrease in the radial, axial, and mean diffusivity were recorded in the ipsilateral corticospinal tract and an increase in fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity was observed in the interhemispheric fibers of the corpus callosum responsible for the interhemispheric connectivity between motor areas. Our case demonstrates clearly that ultra-early low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation applied to the contralateral motor cortex can lead to significant clinical motor improvement in patients with subcortical stroke.


Subject(s)
Stroke , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Male , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/surgery , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Motor Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Aged , Pyramidal Tracts/physiopathology , Pyramidal Tracts/diagnostic imaging , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology
5.
J Neural Eng ; 21(3)2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834060

ABSTRACT

Objective.The corticospinal responses of the motor network to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are highly variable. While often regarded as noise, this variability provides a way of probing dynamic brain states related to excitability. We aimed to uncover spontaneously occurring cortical states that alter corticospinal excitability.Approach.Electroencephalography (EEG) recorded during TMS registers fast neural dynamics-unfortunately, at the cost of anatomical precision. We employed analytic Common Spatial Patterns technique to derive excitability-related cortical activity from pre-TMS EEG signals while overcoming spatial specificity issues.Main results.High corticospinal excitability was predicted by alpha-band activity, localized adjacent to the stimulated left motor cortex, and suggesting a travelling wave-like phenomenon towards frontal regions. Low excitability was predicted by alpha-band activity localized in the medial parietal-occipital and frontal cortical regions.Significance.We established a data-driven approach for uncovering network-level neural activity that modulates TMS effects. It requires no prior anatomical assumptions, while being physiologically interpretable, and can be employed in both exploratory investigation and brain state-dependent stimulation.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Motor Cortex , Nerve Net , Pyramidal Tracts , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Male , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Adult , Female , Motor Cortex/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Nerve Net/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Young Adult , Alpha Rhythm/physiology
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14862, 2024 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937562

ABSTRACT

Tactile Imagery (TI) remains a fairly understudied phenomenon despite growing attention to this topic in recent years. Here, we investigated the effects of TI on corticospinal excitability by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The effects of TI were compared with those of tactile stimulation (TS) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI). Twenty-two participants performed three tasks in randomly assigned order: imagine finger tapping (kMI); experience vibratory sensations in the middle finger (TS); and mentally reproduce the sensation of vibration (TI). MEPs increased during both kMI and TI, with a stronger increase for kMI. No statistically significant change in MEP was observed during TS. The demonstrated differential effects of kMI, TI and TS on corticospinal excitability have practical implications for devising the imagery-based and TS-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly the ones intended to improve neurorehabilitation by evoking plasticity changes in sensorimotor circuitry.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Imagination , Touch , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Male , Female , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Adult , Imagination/physiology , Young Adult , Touch/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Fingers/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Vibration , Brain-Computer Interfaces
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13057, 2024 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844650

ABSTRACT

Combined action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) facilitates corticospinal excitability (CSE) and may potentially induce plastic-like changes in the brain in a similar manner to physical practice. This study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to explore changes in CSE for AOMI of coordinative lower-limb actions. Twenty-four healthy adults completed two baseline (BLH, BLNH) and three AOMI conditions, where they observed a knee extension while simultaneously imagining the same action (AOMICONG), plantarflexion (AOMICOOR-FUNC), or dorsiflexion (AOMICOOR-MOVE). Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were recorded as a marker of CSE for all conditions from two knee extensor, one dorsi flexor, and two plantar flexor muscles following TMS to the right leg representation of the left primary motor cortex. A main effect for experimental condition was reported for all three muscle groups. MEP amplitudes were significantly greater in the AOMICONG condition compared to the BLNH condition (p = .04) for the knee extensors, AOMICOOR-FUNC condition compared to the BLH condition (p = .03) for the plantar flexors, and AOMICOOR-MOVE condition compared to the two baseline conditions for the dorsi flexors (ps ≤ .01). The study findings support the notion that changes in CSE are driven by the imagined actions during coordinative AOMI.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Imagination , Lower Extremity , Motor Cortex , Muscle, Skeletal , Pyramidal Tracts , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Male , Female , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Adult , Motor Cortex/physiology , Imagination/physiology , Young Adult , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Lower Extremity/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Electromyography
8.
J Neurophysiol ; 131(6): 1299-1310, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691532

ABSTRACT

Although recent studies in nonhuman primates have provided evidence that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) activates cells within the reticular formation, it remains unclear whether descending brain stem projections contribute to the generation of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in skeletal muscles. We compared MEPs in muscles with extensive direct corticomotoneuronal input (first dorsal interosseous) versus a prominent role in postural control (gastrocnemius) to determine whether the amplitudes of early and late MEPs were differentially modulated by cortical suppression. Suprathreshold TMS was applied with and without a preceding suprathreshold TMS pulse at two interstimulus intervals (50 and 80 ms). H reflexes in target muscles were also tested with and without TMS conditioning. Early and late gastrocnemius MEPs were differentially modulated by cortical inhibition, the amplitude of the early MEP being significantly reduced by cortical suppression and the late MEP facilitated. The amplitude of H reflexes in the gastrocnemius was reduced within the cortical silent period. Early MEPs in the first dorsal interosseous were also reduced during the silent period, but late MEPs were unaffected. Independent modulation of early and late MEPs in the gastrocnemius muscle supports the idea that the MEP is generated by multiple descending pathways. Suppression of the early MEP is consistent with transmission along the fast-conducting corticospinal tract, whereas facilitation of the late MEP suggests transmission along a corticofugal, potentially cortico-reticulospinal, pathway. Accordingly, differences in late MEP modulation between the first dorsal interosseous and gastrocnemius reflect an increased role of corticofugal pathways in the control of postural muscles.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Early and late portions of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a lower limb postural muscle are modulated independently by cortical suppression, late motor evoked potentials (MEPs) being facilitated during cortical inhibition. These results suggest a cortico-brain stem transmission pathway for late portions of the TMS-induced MEP.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Lower Extremity , Muscle, Skeletal , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Male , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Adult , Female , Lower Extremity/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , H-Reflex/physiology , Young Adult , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology
9.
J Neurophysiol ; 132(1): 78-86, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691520

ABSTRACT

Stroke-caused synergies may result from the preferential use of the reticulospinal tract (RST) due to damage to the corticospinal tract. The RST branches multiple motoneuron pools across the arm together resulting in gross motor control or abnormal synergies, and accordingly, the controllability of individual muscles decreases. However, it is not clear whether muscles involuntarily activated by abnormal synergy vary depending on the muscles voluntarily activated when motor commands descend through the RST. Studies showed that abnormal synergies may originate from the merging and reweighting of synergies in individuals without neurological deficits. This leads to a hypothesis that those abnormal synergies are still selectively excited depending on the context. In this study, we test this hypothesis, leveraging the Fugl-Meyer assessment that could characterize the neuroanatomical architecture in individuals with a wide range of impairments. We examine the ability to perform an out-of-synergy movement with the flexion synergy caused by either shoulder or elbow loading. The results reveal that about 14% [8/57, 95% confidence interval (5.0%, 23.1%)] of the participants with severe impairment (total Fugl-Meyer score <29) in the chronic phase (6 months after stroke) are able to keep the elbow extended during shoulder loading and keep the shoulder at neutral during elbow loading. Those participants underwent a different course of neural reorganization, which enhanced abnormal synergies in comparison with individuals with mild impairment (P < 0.05). These results provide evidence that separate routes and synergy modules to motoneuron pools across the arm might exist even if the motor command is mediated possibly via the RST.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that abnormal synergies are still selectively excited depending on the context.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal , Pyramidal Tracts , Stroke , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Stroke/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiopathology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Aged , Adult , Elbow/physiology , Elbow/physiopathology , Shoulder/physiology , Shoulder/physiopathology
10.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(9)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733030

ABSTRACT

This article presents a study on the neurobiological control of voluntary movements for anthropomorphic robotic systems. A corticospinal neural network model has been developed to control joint trajectories in multi-fingered robotic hands. The proposed neural network simulates cortical and spinal areas, as well as the connectivity between them, during the execution of voluntary movements similar to those performed by humans or monkeys. Furthermore, this neural connection allows for the interpretation of functional roles in the motor areas of the brain. The proposed neural control system is tested on the fingers of a robotic hand, which is driven by agonist-antagonist tendons and actuators designed to accurately emulate complex muscular functionality. The experimental results show that the corticospinal controller produces key properties of biological movement control, such as bell-shaped asymmetric velocity profiles and the ability to compensate for disturbances. Movements are dynamically compensated for through sensory feedback. Based on the experimental results, it is concluded that the proposed biologically inspired adaptive neural control system is robust, reliable, and adaptable to robotic platforms with diverse biomechanics and degrees of freedom. The corticospinal network successfully integrates biological concepts with engineering control theory for the generation of functional movement. This research significantly contributes to improving our understanding of neuromotor control in both animals and humans, thus paving the way towards a new frontier in the field of neurobiological control of anthropomorphic robotic systems.


Subject(s)
Hand , Neural Networks, Computer , Robotics , Tendons , Humans , Robotics/methods , Hand/physiology , Tendons/physiology , Movement/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Animals
11.
Eur J Neurosci ; 59(12): 3403-3421, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666628

ABSTRACT

Joint action (JA) is a continuous process of motor co-regulation based on the integration of contextual (top-down) and kinematic (bottom-up) cues from partners. The fine equilibrium between excitation and inhibition in sensorimotor circuits is, thus, central to such a dynamic process of action selection and execution. In a bimanual task adapted to become a unimanual JA task, the participant held a bottle (JA), while a confederate had to reach and unscrew either that bottle or another stabilized by a mechanical clamp (No_JA). Prior knowledge was manipulated in each trial such that the participant knew (K) or not (No_K) the target bottle in advance. Online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was administered at action-relevant landmarks to explore corticospinal excitability (CSE) and inhibition (cortical silent period [cSP]). CSE was modulated early on before the action started if prior information was available. In contrast, cSP modulation emerged later during the reaching action, regardless of prior information. These two indexes could thus reflect the concurrent elaboration of contextual priors (top-down) and the online sampling of partner's kinematic cues (bottom-up). Furthermore, participants selected either one of two possible behavioural strategies, preferring early or late force exertion on the bottle. One translates into a reduced risk of motor coordination failure and the other into reduced metabolic expenditure. Each strategy was characterised by a specific excitatory/inhibitory profile. In conclusion, the study of excitatory/inhibitory balance paves the way for the neurophysiological determination of individual differences in the combination of top-down and bottom-up processing during JA coordination.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Psychomotor Performance , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Male , Female , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Young Adult , Individuality , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology
12.
Brain Stimul ; 17(2): 476-484, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation hold promise for inducing brain plasticity. However, their limited precision may hamper certain applications. In contrast, Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS), known for its precision and deep brain targeting capabilities, requires further investigation to establish its efficacy in producing enduring effects for treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the enduring effects of different pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) of TUS on motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS: T1-, T2-weighted, and zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 21 neurologically healthy participants for neuronavigation, skull reconstruction, and the performance of transcranial ultrasound and thermal modelling. The effects of three different TUS PRFs (10, 100, and 1000 Hz) with a constant duty cycle of 10 % on corticospinal excitability in the primary motor cortex were assessed using TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Each PRF and sham condition was evaluated on separate days, with measurements taken 5-, 30-, and 60-min post-TUS. RESULTS: A significant decrease in MEP amplitude was observed with a PRF of 10 Hz (p = 0.007), which persisted for at least 30 min, and with a PRF of 100 Hz (p = 0.001), lasting over 60 min. However, no significant changes were found for the PRF of 1000 Hz and the sham conditions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significance of PRF selection in TUS and underscores its potential as a non-invasive approach to reduce corticospinal excitability, offering valuable insights for future clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Motor Cortex , Humans , Motor Cortex/physiology , Motor Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Male , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Adult , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Young Adult , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/diagnostic imaging , Neural Inhibition/physiology
13.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 20(4): e1011468, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626210

ABSTRACT

Neurons in the cerebral cortex receive thousands of synaptic inputs per second from thousands of presynaptic neurons. How the dendritic location of inputs, their timing, strength, and presynaptic origin, in conjunction with complex dendritic physiology, impact the transformation of synaptic input into action potential (AP) output remains generally unknown for in vivo conditions. Here, we introduce a computational approach to reveal which properties of the input causally underlie AP output, and how this neuronal input-output computation is influenced by the morphology and biophysical properties of the dendrites. We demonstrate that this approach allows dissecting of how different input populations drive in vivo observed APs. For this purpose, we focus on fast and broadly tuned responses that pyramidal tract neurons in layer 5 (L5PTs) of the rat barrel cortex elicit upon passive single whisker deflections. By reducing a multi-scale model that we reported previously, we show that three features are sufficient to predict with high accuracy the sensory responses and receptive fields of L5PTs under these specific in vivo conditions: the count of active excitatory versus inhibitory synapses preceding the response, their spatial distribution on the dendrites, and the AP history. Based on these three features, we derive an analytically tractable description of the input-output computation of L5PTs, which enabled us to dissect how synaptic input from thalamus and different cell types in barrel cortex contribute to these responses. We show that the input-output computation is preserved across L5PTs despite morphological and biophysical diversity of their dendrites. We found that trial-to-trial variability in L5PT responses, and cell-to-cell variability in their receptive fields, are sufficiently explained by variability in synaptic input from the network, whereas variability in biophysical and morphological properties have minor contributions. Our approach to derive analytically tractable models of input-output computations in L5PTs provides a roadmap to dissect network-neuron interactions underlying L5PT responses across different in vivo conditions and for other cell types.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Models, Neurological , Somatosensory Cortex , Animals , Rats , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/cytology , Action Potentials/physiology , Dendrites/physiology , Vibrissae/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Computational Biology , Pyramidal Cells/physiology , Computer Simulation , Nerve Net/physiology
14.
Exp Physiol ; 109(5): 672-688, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578259

ABSTRACT

This study compared the acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction (BFR), and free-flow, high-load exercise. Participants performed four experimental conditions where they completed baseline measures of pain pressure threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary force (MVF) with peripheral nerve stimulation to determine central and peripheral fatigue. Corticospinal excitability (CSE), corticospinal inhibition and short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were estimated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Participants then performed low-load leg press exercise at 30% of one-repetition maximum (LL); low-load leg press with BFR at 40% (BFR40) or 80% (BFR80) of limb occlusion pressure; or high-load leg press of four sets of 10 repetitions at 70% one-repetition maximum (HL). Measurements were repeated at 5, 45 min and 24 h post-exercise. There were no differences in CSE or SICI between conditions (all P > 0.05); however, corticospinal inhibition was reduced to a greater extent (11%-14%) in all low-load conditions compared to HL (P < 0.005). PPTs were 12%-16% greater at 5 min post-exercise in BFR40, BFR80 and HL compared to LL (P ≤ 0.016). Neuromuscular fatigue displayed no clear difference in the magnitude or time course between conditions (all P > 0.05). In summary, low-load BFR resistance exercise does not induce different acute neurophysiological responses to low-load, free-flow exercise but it does promote a greater degree of hypoalgesia and reduces corticospinal inhibition more than high-load exercise, making it a useful rehabilitation tool. The changes in neurophysiology following exercise were not related to changes in PPT.


Subject(s)
Pain Threshold , Regional Blood Flow , Resistance Training , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Male , Resistance Training/methods , Female , Adult , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Pain Threshold/physiology , Young Adult , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Exercise/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology
15.
Cell Rep ; 43(4): 113986, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598336

ABSTRACT

Layer 5 neurons of the neocortex receive their principal inputs from layer 2/3 neurons. We seek to identify the nature and extent of the plasticity of these projections with motor learning. Using optogenetic and viral intersectional tools to selectively stimulate distinct neuronal subsets in rat primary motor cortex, we simultaneously record from pairs of corticospinal neurons associated with distinct features of motor output control: distal forelimb vs. proximal forelimb. Activation of Channelrhodopsin2-expressing layer 2/3 afferents onto layer 5 in untrained animals produces greater monosynaptic excitation of neurons controlling the proximal forelimb. Following skilled grasp training, layer 2/3 inputs onto corticospinal neurons controlling the distal forelimb associated with skilled grasping become significantly stronger. Moreover, peak excitatory response amplitude nearly doubles while latency shortens, and excitatory-to-inhibitory latencies become significantly prolonged. These findings demonstrate distinct, highly segregated, and cell-specific plasticity of layer 2/3 projections during skilled grasp motor learning.


Subject(s)
Forelimb , Motor Cortex , Neuronal Plasticity , Animals , Forelimb/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Motor Cortex/cytology , Rats , Learning/physiology , Hand Strength/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Male , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Female , Optogenetics , Rats, Long-Evans
17.
Neuroreport ; 35(6): 413-420, 2024 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526943

ABSTRACT

Motor imagery is a cognitive process involving the simulation of motor actions without actual movements. Despite the reported positive effects of motor imagery training on motor function, the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate how sustained tonic finger-pinching motor imagery modulates sensorimotor integration and corticospinal excitability using short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessments, respectively. Able-bodied individuals participated in the study and assessments were conducted under two experimental conditions in a randomized order between participants: (1) participants performed motor imagery of a pinch task while observing a visual image displayed on a monitor (Motor Imagery), and (2) participants remained at rest with their eyes fixed on the monitor displaying a cross mark (Control). For each condition, sensorimotor integration and corticospinal excitability were evaluated during sustained tonic motor imagery in separate sessions. Sensorimotor integration was assessed by SAI responses, representing inhibition of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle elicited by TMS following median nerve stimulation. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by MEP responses elicited by single-pulse TMS. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of SAI responses between motor imagery and Control conditions, while MEP responses were significantly facilitated during the Motor Imagery condition compared to the Control condition. These findings suggest that motor imagery facilitates corticospinal excitability, without altering sensorimotor integration, possibly due to insufficient activation of the somatosensory circuits or lack of afferent feedback during sustained tonic motor imagery.


Subject(s)
Fingers , Muscle, Skeletal , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Fingers/physiology , Hand/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Median Nerve/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Electromyography , Imagination/physiology
18.
Cell Rep ; 43(4): 113993, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551963

ABSTRACT

Corticospinal neurons (CSNs) synapse directly on spinal neurons, a diverse assortment of cells with unique structural and functional properties necessary for body movements. CSNs modulating forelimb behavior fractionate into caudal forelimb area (CFA) and rostral forelimb area (RFA) motor cortical populations. Despite their prominence, the full diversity of spinal neurons targeted by CFA and RFA CSNs is uncharted. Here, we use anatomical and RNA sequencing methods to show that CSNs synapse onto a remarkably selective group of spinal cell types, favoring inhibitory populations that regulate motoneuron activity and gate sensory feedback. CFA and RFA CSNs target similar spinal neuron types, with notable exceptions that suggest that these populations differ in how they influence behavior. Finally, axon collaterals of CFA and RFA CSNs target similar brain regions yet receive highly divergent inputs. These results detail the rules of CSN connectivity throughout the brain and spinal cord for two regions critical for forelimb behavior.


Subject(s)
Forelimb , Pyramidal Tracts , Animals , Forelimb/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Spinal Cord/physiology , Spinal Cord/cytology , Mice , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Motor Neurons/physiology , Female , Male , Axons/physiology , Synapses/physiology
19.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 160: 56-67, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401191

ABSTRACT

Corticospinal neurons located in motor areas of the cerebral neocortex project corticospinal axons which synapse with the spinal network; a parallel corticobulbar system projects to the cranial motor network and to brainstem motor pathways. The primate corticospinal system has a widespread cortical origin and an extensive range of different fibre diameters, including thick, fast-conducting axons. Direct cortico-motoneuronal (CM) projections from the motor cortex to arm and hand alpha motoneurons are a recent evolutionary feature, that is well developed in dexterous primates and particularly in humans. Many of these projections originate from the caudal subdivision of area 4 ('new' M1: primary motor cortex). They arise from corticospinal neurons of varied soma size, including those with fast- and relatively slow-conducting axons. This CM system has been shown to be involved in the control of skilled movements, carried out with fractionation of the distal extremities and at low force levels. During movement, corticospinal neurons are activated quite differently from 'lower' motoneurons, and there is no simple or fixed functional relationship between a so-called 'upper' motoneuron and its target lower motoneuron. There are key differences in the organisation and function of the corticospinal and CM system in primates versus non-primates, such as rodents. These differences need to be recognized when making the choice of animal model for understanding disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this neurodegenerative brain disease there is a selective loss of fast-conducting corticospinal axons, and their synaptic connections, and this is reflected in responses to non-invasive cortical stimuli and measures of cortico-muscular coherence. The loss of CM connections influencing distal limb muscles results in a differential loss of muscle strength or 'split-hand' phenotype. Importantly, there is also a unique impairment in the coordination of skilled hand tasks that require fractionation of digit movement. Scores on validated tests of skilled hand function could be used to assess disease progression.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Pyramidal Tracts , Animals , Humans , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Motor Neurons/physiology , Primates , Axons
20.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 30(2): e14561, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421127

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Control of finger forces underlies our capacity for skilled hand movements acquired during development and reacquired after neurological injury. Learning force control by the digits, therefore, predicates our functional independence. Noninvasive neuromodulation targeting synapses that link corticospinal neurons onto the final common pathway via spike-timing-dependent mechanisms can alter distal limb motor output on a transient basis, yet these effects appear subject to individual differences. Here, we investigated how this form of noninvasive neuromodulation interacts with task repetition to influence early learning of force control during precision grip. METHODS: The unique effects of neuromodulation, task repetition, and neuromodulation coinciding with task repetition were tested in three separate conditions using a within-subject, cross-over design (n = 23). RESULTS: We found that synchronizing depolarization events within milliseconds of stabilizing precision grip accelerated learning but only after accounting for individual differences through inclusion of subjects who showed upregulated corticospinal excitability at 2 of 3 time points following conditioning stimulation (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide insights into how the state of the corticospinal system can be leveraged to drive early motor skill learning, further emphasizing individual differences in the response to noninvasive neuromodulation. We interpret these findings in the context of biological mechanisms underlying the observed effects and implications for emerging therapeutic applications.


Subject(s)
Motor Cortex , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Hand/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neurons , Pyramidal Tracts/injuries , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Spinal Cord , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Cross-Over Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...