Cataract Formation in a Child Receiving Dabrafenib and Trametinib Therapy.

The authors report a case of bilateral cataract in a 9-year-old girl after being treated with a combination of the targeted therapy drugs dabrafenib and trametinib. Although adverse effects have been reported with this treatment, this report is the first documented case of cataract as a complication. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(5):e47-e49.].

Safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in peritoneal dialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial (APIDP2).

INTRODUCTION: Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that novel oral anticoagulants are safer compared with vitamin K antagonists for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent thromboembolic events in the general population. There is a growing interest in the use of apixaban in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) but there is a lack of randomised data in this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: APIDP2 is a prospective parallel, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial involving patients with ESRD undergoing chronic PD who have NVAF. A total of 178 participants will be recruited from 20 French PD centres. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either apixaban at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg two times per day (dose determined with the previous pharmacokinetic study APIDP1) or dose-adjusted to international normalised ratio (INR) target (2-3) coumadin therapy. Anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic events will be initiated or changed according to the randomisation for a duration of 1 year. The primary outcome is a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding from randomisation up to month 12, assessed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Score. Secondary outcomes encompass an efficacy composite criterion combining stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), cardiovascular death and thrombosis including myocardial infarction cumulated at 12 months. Bleeding events will be also classified according to Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria and pharmacodynamics outcomes will evaluate the time within the INR target range of 2-3 in the warfarin arm over 1 year, and anti-Xa apixaban activity in case of bleeding events and at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of follow-up in the apixaban arm. To demonstrate that apixaban is safer than warfarin at 1 year, assuming two interim analyses after 60 and 118 patients, a bilateral alpha risk of 5% and a power of 80%, 178 patients are needed in this randomised trial (effect size found from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) Study among patients with creatinine clearance 25-30 ml/min), that is, 89 patients per group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Est III - Lyon - FRANCE, CT number 2023-507544-37-00. Written informed consent is required for each participant. Findings will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06045858; European Clinical Trial System, CT number 2023-507544-37-00.

Apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not dabigatran are associated with higher mortality compared to vitamin-K antagonists: A retrospective German claims data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials. METHODS: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding. RESULTS: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs.

Modelling the effects of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the management of factor Xa-associated bleeding.

The management of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated bleeding remains a clinical challenge. Massive bleeding is often associated with complex coagulopathy and, thus, the sole reversal of FXa inhibitors might not be sufficient to restore hemostasis, requiring instead a multimodal approach. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is widely recognized as a viable treatment option for FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. Here, we applied computational models to explore the effect 4F-PCC has on the coagulation cascade and restoration of thrombin generation in a system that simulates a patient that has received a FXa inhibitor. The coagulation model is largely based on a previously developed model with modifications incorporated from various other published sources. The model was calibrated and validated using data from a phase 3 clinical trial of vitamin K antagonist reversal with 4F-PCC. Using the parameters and initial conditions determined during the calibration and validation process, the prothrombin time (PT) test simulations predicted a PT of 11.4 seconds. The model successfully simulated the effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban on total thrombin concentration and showed that 4F-PCC increased thrombin generation in the presence of rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Prospective Monitoring of New Drugs in Older Adults with and without Frailty: Near-Real-Time Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prospective sequential analyses after a new drug approval allow proactive surveillance of new drugs. In the current study, we demonstrate feasibility of frailty-specific sequential analyses for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin. METHODS: We partitioned Medicare data from 2011 to 2020 into datasets based on calendar year following the date of drug approval. Each calendar year of data was added sequentially for analysis. We used a new-user, active comparative design by comparing the initiators of dabigatran versus warfarin, rivaroxaban versus warfarin, and apixaban versus warfarin. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation without contraindication to the anticoagulants were included. Claims-based frailty index ≥ 0.25 was used to define frailty. The initiators of each direct oral anticoagulant were propensity-score matched to the initiators of warfarin within each frailty status. The effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding. For each calendar year, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models using all data available up to that year. RESULTS: As an example of the results, in the 2020 dataset, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (frail: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85; non-frail: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.72) and major bleeding (frail: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.69; non-frail: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.63) in both frail and non-frail patients. We found evidence for apixaban's effectiveness and safety within 1-2 years after the drug approval in frail older patients. CONCLUSION: Our frailty-specific sequential analyses can be applied to future near-real-time monitoring of newly approved drugs.

Comparison of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation using the UK clinical practice research Datalink Aurum: A reference trial (ARISTOTLE) emulation study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke prevention guidance for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) uses evidence generated from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, applicability to patient groups excluded from trials remains unknown. Real-world patient data provide an opportunity to evaluate outcomes in a trial analogous population of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) users and in patients otherwise excluded from RCTs; however, there remains uncertainty on the validity of methods and suitability of the data. Successful reference trial emulation can support the generation of evidence around treatment effects in groups excluded or underrepresented in trials. We used linked United Kingdom primary care data to investigate whether we could emulate the pivotal ARISTOTLE trial (apixaban versus warfarin) and extend the analysis to investigate the impact of warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) on results. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients with AF in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD Aurum) prescribed apixaban or warfarin from 1 January 2013 to 31 July 2019 were selected. ARISTOTLE eligibility criteria were applied to this population and matched to the RCT apixaban arm on baseline characteristics creating a trial-analogous apixaban cohort; this was propensity-score matched to warfarin users in the CPRD Aurum. ARISTOTLE outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by prior warfarin exposure status during 2.5 years of patient follow-up and results benchmarked against the trial results before treatment effectiveness was further evaluated based on (warfarin) TTR. The dataset comprised 8,734 apixaban users and propensity-score matched 8,734 warfarin users. Results [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] confirmed apixaban noninferiority for stroke or systemic embolism (SE) [CPRD 0.98 (0.82,1.19) versus trial 0.79 (0.66,0.95)] and death from any cause [CPRD 1.03 (0.93,1.14) versus trial 0.89 (0.80,0.998)] but did not indicate apixaban superiority. Absolute event rates for stroke/SE were similar for apixaban in CPRD Aurum and ARISTOTLE (1.27%/year), whereas a lower event rate was observed for warfarin (CPRD Aurum 1.29%/year, ARISTOTLE 1.60%/year). Analysis by TTR suggested similar effectiveness of apixaban compared with poorly controlled warfarin (TTR < 0.75) for stroke/SE [0.91 (0.73, 1.14)], all-cause death [0.94 (0.84, 1.06)], and superiority for major bleeding [0.74 (0.63, 0.86)]. However, when compared with well-controlled warfarin (TTR ≥ 0.75), apixaban was associated with an increased hazard for all-cause death [1.20 (1.04, 1.37)], and there was no significant benefit for major bleeding [1.08 (0.90, 1.30)]. The main limitation of the study's methodology are the risk of residual confounding, channelling bias and attrition bias in the warfarin arm, and selection bias and misclassification in the analysis by TTR. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of noninterventional data generated results demonstrating noninferiority of apixaban versus warfarin consistent with prespecified benchmarking criteria. Unlike in ARISTOTLE, superiority of apixaban versus warfarin was not seen, possible due to the lower proportion of Asian patients and higher proportion of patients with well-controlled warfarin compared to ARISTOTLE. This methodological template can be used to investigate treatment effects of oral anticoagulants in patient groups excluded from or underrepresented in trials and provides a framework that can be adapted to investigate treatment effects for other conditions.

Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation After ACS and/or PCI: A 4-Way Comparison From AUGUSTUS.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy. METHODS: AUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y12 inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT02415400).

Milvexian vs apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: The LIBREXIA atrial fibrillation trial rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter; however, bleeding remains a significant concern, limiting their use. Milvexian is an oral Factor XIa inhibitor that may offer similar anticoagulant efficacy with less bleeding risk. METHODS: LIBREXIA AF (NCT05757869) is a global phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven trial to compare milvexian with apixaban in participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Participants are randomly assigned to milvexian 100 mg or apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg per label indication) twice daily. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate if milvexian is noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety objective is to evaluate if milvexian is superior to apixaban in reducing the endpoint of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding events and the composite endpoint of ISTH major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding events. In total, 15,500 participants from approximately 1,000 sites in over 30 countries are planned to be enrolled. They will be followed until both 430 primary efficacy outcome events and 530 principal safety events are observed, which is estimated to take approximately 4 years. CONCLUSION: The LIBREXIA AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of the oral Factor XIa inhibitor milvexian compared with apixaban in participants with either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757869.

Rethinking the use of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are at high risk for recurrent thrombosis, and indefinite anticoagulation is recommended. Patients with APS merit indefinite anticoagulation, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have historically been the standard treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present an appealing alternative to VKAs. Due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, DOACs offer advantages over VKAs, namely the lack of need for laboratory monitoring, the usage of a fixed dosage, and the absence of significant interaction with dietary components and drugs. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with APS have been studied in four phase II/III clinical trials (three with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban). These studies showed DOACs' inferiority compared to VKAs in preventing recurrent thrombosis. Recurrence was significantly greater in patients with arterial thrombotic events and a triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies. No differences were observed in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between both groups. Major bleeding was similar in patients treated with DOACs or VKAs. Several observational studies have reported similar results. This review aims to analyse the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in patients with APS.

Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become a standard of care for anticoagulation (AC) in patients with AF and VTE, the appropriate use of these agents in comorbid kidney impairment warrants detailed discussion. This scientific narrative review summarizes the effectiveness and safety of apixaban use in patients with renal dysfunction by assessing the current published pharmacokinetic, interventional, observational, and guideline data. Apixaban is a highly selective, orally active, direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with well-established pharmacokinetics and consistent clinical outcomes across a broad range of patient populations, including those with kidney impairment. Overall, the scientific literature has shown that apixaban has a favorable clinical efficacy and safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists for patients with AF or VTE and comorbid kidney impairment. These data support the approved label dosing strategy of apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and in treating VTE across all ranges of kidney function. Both clinician experience and knowledge of patient-specific factors may be required in the management of comorbid patients with advanced CKD or those requiring dialysis, as data on these patients are limited.

Reprint of: Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy and safety of apixaban and warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD). Apixaban decreased incidence of stroke and bleeding compared with warfarin in major clinical trials that excluded patients with severe renal dysfunction. Apixaban is no longer contraindicated in patients with ESRD on HD with NVAF based on pharmacokinetic studies. Limited clinical data exist for patients with ESRD on HD on apixaban. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of NVAF and ESRD on HD who were prescribed apixaban or warfarin for stroke prevention in the years 2018 through 2019. Patients' charts were reviewed for up to a 2-year period. Patients on renal replacement therapy other than HD, those using anticoagulation for reasons other than NVAF, patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis, and those with severe mitral valve stenosis were excluded. The primary outcome was emergency department visits or hospital admissions for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Secondary outcomes included major or minor bleeding and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were screened; 110 patients met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Four patients (7.5%) in the apixaban group and 6 patients (10.5%) in the warfarin group met the primary outcome of hospitalization or emergency department visit for stroke (P = 0.742). Symptomatic bleeding occurred in 39.6% of patients in the apixaban group and 36.8% in the warfarin group (P = 0.918). A trend in major bleeding occurred more often in the warfarin group, 52.4% versus 49.2% (P = 0.758). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety outcomes between apixaban and warfarin in patients with NVAF and ESRD on HD in the intention-to-treat analysis of our study. Larger trials are needed to further analyze this patient population.

Apixaban vs Aspirin in Patients With Cancer and Cryptogenic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Approximately 10% to 15% of ischemic strokes are associated with cancer; cancer-associated stroke, particularly when cryptogenic, is associated with high rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies in patients with cancer and cryptogenic stroke. Objective: To compare apixaban vs aspirin for the prevention of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with history of cancer and cryptogenic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc analysis of data from 1015 patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and biomarker evidence of atrial cardiopathy in the Atrial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs in Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke (ARCADIA) trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted from 2018 to 2023 at 185 stroke centers in North America. Data analysis was performed from October 15, 2023, to May 23, 2024. Exposures: Oral apixaban, 5 mg (or 2.5 mg if criteria met), twice daily vs oral aspirin, 81 mg, once daily. Subgroups of patients with and without cancer at baseline were examined. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome for this post hoc analysis was a composite of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events. Major ischemic events were recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Major hemorrhagic events included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and any major extracranial hemorrhage. Results: Among 1015 participants (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-76] years; 551 [54.3%] female), 137 (13.5%) had a history of cancer. The median (IQR) follow-up was 1.5 (0.6-2.5) years for patients with history of cancer and 1.5 (0.6-3.0) years for those without history of cancer. Participants with history of cancer, compared with those without history of cancer, had a higher risk of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.71). Among those with history of cancer, 8 of 61 participants (13.1%) randomized to apixaban and 16 of 76 participants (21.1%) randomized to aspirin had a major ischemic or major hemorrhagic event; however, the risk was not significantly different between groups (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26-1.43). Comparing participants randomized to apixaban vs aspirin among those with cancer, events included recurrent stroke (5 [8.2%] vs 9 [11.8%]), major ischemic events (7 [11.5%] vs 14 [18.4%]), and major hemorrhagic events (1 [1.6%] vs 2 [2.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among participants in the ARCADIA trial with history of cancer, the risk of major ischemic and hemorrhagic events did not differ significantly with apixaban compared with aspirin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215.

Emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive-fibrosing lung disease with a median survival of less than 5 years. Currently, two agents, pirfenidone and nintedanib are approved for this disease, and both have been shown to reduce the rate of decline in lung function in patients with IPF. However, both have significant adverse effects and neither completely arrest the decline in lung function. AREAS COVERED: Thirty experimental agents with unique mechanisms of action that are being evaluated for the treatment of IPF are discussed. These agents work through various mechanisms of action, these include inhibition of transcription nuclear factor k-B on fibroblasts, reduced expression of metalloproteinase 7, the generation of more lysophosphatidic acids, blocking the effects of transforming growth factor ß, and reducing reactive oxygen species as examples of some unique mechanisms of action of these agents. EXPERT OPINION: New drug development has the potential to expand the treatment options available in the treatment of IPF patients. It is expected that the adverse drug effect profiles will be more favorable than current agents. It is further anticipated that these new agents or combinations of agents will arrest the fibrosis, not just slow the fibrotic process.

BRAF and MEK inhibitor targeted therapy in papillary craniopharyngiomas: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF/MEK inhibitors has emerged as a potential treatment in papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs). However, standardized data on large cohorts are lacking. Our study aimed to assess real-life efficacy and safety of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCPs. DESIGN: Retrospective French multicenter study involving BRAF V600E-mutated PCP patients, treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib and trametinib, from April 2019 to July 2023. METHODS: Objective response and clinical and safety outcomes were assessed after 3 months and at the last available follow-up during TT. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (8 females, mean age 50.5 ± 15.75 years), receiving either neoadjuvant therapy (NEO) for non-resectable tumors (n = 6), post-surgical adjuvant therapy (ADJ; n = 8), or palliative therapy (PAL) following failure of multimodal treatment (n = 2), were included.At the last follow-up (mean 7.6 ± 5.3 months), 12 patients showed subtotal response, 3 exhibited partial response, and 1 maintained stable disease. Mean volume reduction was 88.9 ± 4.4%, 73.3 ± 23.4%, and 91.8 ± 4.3% in the NEO, ADJ, and PAL groups, respectively.Targeted therapy resolved headaches in 5/5 patients and visual impairment in 6/9; 2/3 patients had improved neurological symptoms, 1/4 presented weight loss, and 2/14 recovered endocrine function.Targeted therapy was well-tolerated in 62.5% of cases; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 5 patients and definitive discontinuation in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 94% of patients showed partial response or better to TT. Adverse events were acceptable. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols; however, these results advocate for a NEO approach in invasive PCPs.

Prognosis of Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Prior Anticoagulant Therapy: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been the drug of choice for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation since 2014. In previous studies, the stroke risk while taking warfarin was 2 per 100 patient-years and 1.5% per year while taking DOACs. We hypothesized that even if ischemic stroke occurred during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs, the prognosis was likely to be better than that with warfarin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2002 to 2019, sourced from a nationwide claims database, were used to identify atrial fibrillation patients using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients who experienced an ischemic stroke during anticoagulation were categorized by the drugs used (warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The primary outcome was mortality within 3 months and 1 year after the ischemic stroke. Among the 9578 patients with ischemic stroke during anticoagulation, 3343 received warfarin, and 6235 received DOACs (965 dabigatran, 2320 apixaban, 1702 rivaroxaban, 1248 edoxaban). The DOACs group demonstrated lower risks of 3-month (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.550, [95% CI, 0.473-0.639]; P<0.0001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR, 0.596 [95% CI, 0.536-0.663]; P<0.0001) than the warfarin group. Apixaban and edoxaban within the DOAC group exhibited particularly reduced 1-year mortality risk compared with other DOACs (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that DOACs have a better prognosis than warfarin after ischemic stroke. The apixaban and edoxaban groups had a lower risk of death after ischemic stroke than the other DOAC groups.

Risk of Major Bleeding, Stroke/Systemic Embolism, and Death Associated With Different Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease have higher risks of bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. However, optimal anticoagulant choice in these high-risk patients remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using deidentified electronic health records from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, adults with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) initiating warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban between 2011 and 2021 were included. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, adjusted risks of major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death were compared among agents. A total of 6794 patients were included (mean age, 78.5 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2; 51% women). Apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 1.5 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.70]), and similar risks for stroke/systemic embolism (incidence rate, 1.9 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.09]) and death (incidence rate, 4.6 versus 4.5 per 100 person-years; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 4.9 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.10-2.48]), with no difference in risks for stroke/systemic embolism and death. Apixaban versus rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (sub-HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78]). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings are consistent with potential safety advantages of apixaban over warfarin and rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials comparing individual oral anticoagulants are warranted.

Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Treatment Apixaban Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world evidence is available comparing the safety and effectiveness of apixaban and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer receiving anticoagulation in an extended treatment setting. This study evaluated the risk of bleeding and recurrent VTE in patients with cancer-associated VTE who were prescribed apixaban or LMWH for ≥3 months. METHODS: A US commercial claims database was used to identify adult patients with VTE and active cancer who initiated apixaban or LMWH 30 days following the first VTE diagnosis and had ≥3 months of continuous enrollment and 3 months of primary anticoagulation treatment. Patients were followed from the day after the end of primary anticoagulation treatment until the earliest of: date of disenrollment, discontinuation of index anticoagulant, switch to another anticoagulant, or end of the study period. Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment cohorts. Incidence rates (IRs) for the outcomes were calculated per 100 person-years (PY). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the adjusted risk of recurrent VTE, major bleeding (MB), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). RESULTS: A total of 13,564 apixaban- and 2,808 LMWH-treated patients were analyzed. Post-IPTW, the treatment cohorts were balanced. Patients receiving apixaban had lower adjusted IRs for recurrent VTE (4.1 vs 9.6 per 100 PY), MB (6.3 vs 12.6), and CRNMB (26.1 vs 36.0) versus LMWH (P<.0001 for all comparisons) during the follow-up period. Patients on apixaban had a lower adjusted risk of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.53), MB (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.61), and CRNMB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85) versus LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: Extended anticoagulation treatment of ≥3 months with apixaban was associated with lower rates of recurrent VTE, MB, and CRNMB compared with LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE.

Integrase inhibitor drugs during pregnancy and congenital anomalies: A case/non-case study from the global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase®.

In 2018, a significant neural tube defects (NTD) signal was reported after pre-conceptional exposure to dolutegravir, but was not confirmed in further analysis. Since 2019, dolutegravir-based regimen, an integrase inhibitor (INI), is recommended by WHO as the most-effective first-line therapy in all patients living with HIV. To explore the potential INI-related teratogenic effect, we searched disproportionate signals between exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies, compared to non-INI drugs, using the international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®. We selected all the reports registered in VigiBase® between 01/01/2007 and 30/03/2021 on any antiretroviral drug-related fetal or neonatal adverse drug reactions, declared either in children (<2 years) exposed in utero or in pregnant women (12-50 years). A case/non-case study was conducted to detected signals between congenital anomalies and prenatal exposure to any INI-class drug, compared to non-INI drugs, by estimating adjusted reporting odds ratios (aROR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We identified 2521 unique reports, among which 664 (26.3%) were related to INI-class use. Overall, 520 congenital anomalies were cited from 327 unique reports, of whom 31.0% were INI-related. Compared to non-INI drugs, no significant disproportionate reporting signal between prenatal exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies was found (aROR 1.13; 95% CI:0.85-1.51). However, specific significant signals were reported for raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir drug exposure and urinary malformations (aROR 2.43; 95%CI:1.08-5.43), digestive malformations (aROR 3.09; 95%CI:1.22-7.84), and NTDs (aROR 3.02; 95%CI:1.09-8.37). Although specific congenital anomalies signals associated with raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir exposure were notified, causal relationship needs to be further investigated in prospective studies.