Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(12): 5649-5659, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is an oral toxicity caused by cancer treatment, found often in patients with head and neck cancer. Low-intensity laser therapy for OM has anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and tissue reparative properties. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials of OM laser therapy in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancers, followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis of the therapy. METHOD: The search terms, mucositis and phototherapy, laser therapy and mucositis, photobiomodulation and mucositis, and low-level laser therapy and mucositis, were used to search the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. Randomized clinical trials were divided into two groups: one treated with laser therapy and the other given a placebo. Only 13 studies were included in the systematic review, and 6 studies in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis show that the laser therapy presented good results in clinical improvement and pain reduction, decreasing the patients' likelihood of developing OM, with degrees of debilitating lesions, to 64% (RR = 0.36 [95% CI = 0.29-0.44]). The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an incremental cost of R$ 3687.53 for the laser group, with an incremental effectiveness of 132.2. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 27.89, for the severe OM cases that were avoided. CONCLUSION: It was concluded, therefore, that photobiomodulation for OM in patients receiving head and neck cancer treatment was clinically effective and cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Laser Therapy/methods , Phototherapy/methods , Stomatitis/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/economics , Humans , Laser Therapy/economics , Phototherapy/economics , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Stomatitis/economics , Stomatitis/etiology
2.
Trials ; 20(1): 97, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30709370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is the most frequent and debilitating acute side effect associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. When present, severe OM negatively impacts the quality of life of patients undergoing HNC treatment. Photobiomodulation is a well-consolidated and effective therapy for the treatment and prevention of severe OM, and is associated with a cost reduction of the cancer treatment. Although an increase in the quality of life and a reduction in the severity of OM are well described, there is no study on cost-effectiveness for this approach considering the quality of life as a primary outcome. In addition, little is known about the photobiomodulation effects on salivary inflammatory mediators. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the photobiomodulation therapy for the prevention and control of severe OM and its influence on the salivary inflammatory mediators. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial will include 50 HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The participants will be randomized into two groups: intervention group (photobiomodulation) and control group (preventive oral care protocol). OM (clinical assessment), saliva (assessment of collected samples) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms questionnaires) will be assessed at the 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st and 30th radiotherapy sessions. Oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokine levels will be measured in the saliva samples of all participants. The costs are identified, measured and evaluated considering the radiotherapy time interval. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated. The study will be conducted according to the Brazilian public health system perspective. DISCUSSION: Photobiomodulation is an effective therapy that reduces the cost associated with OM treatment. However, little is known about its cost-effectiveness, mainly when quality of life is the effectiveness measure. Additionally, this therapy is not supported by the Brazilian public health system. Therefore, this study widens the knowledge about the safety of and strengthens evidence for the use of photobiomodulation therapy, providing information for public policy-makers and also for dental care professionals. This study is strongly encouraged due to its clinical relevance and the possibility of incorporating new technology into public health systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials-ReBEC, RBR-5h4y4n . Registered on 13 June 2017.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Salivary Glands/radiation effects , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Biomarkers/metabolism , Brazil , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cranial Irradiation/economics , Cytokines/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Head and Neck Neoplasms/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/economics , Oxidative Stress , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/metabolism , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Saliva/metabolism , Salivary Glands/metabolism , Severity of Illness Index , Stomatitis/economics , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL