Nonoperative management and local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer represents a significant clinical challenge, and currently, the standard treatment is based on neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by radical surgical resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). In the last 30 years, its management has undergone significant changes due to the improvement of complementary radio- and chemotherapy treatments, the improvement of minimally invasive surgical approaches and the diffusion of organ-sparing approaches, such as nonoperative management, commonly called "watch and wait" (NOM) and local excision (LE), in highly selected patients who achieve a major or complete response to neoadjuvant CRT. This review aimed to critically examine the efficacy and oncological safety of NOM and LE compared to those of standard TME in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant CRT. Both the pros and cons of these approaches were strictly analyzed, providing a comprehensive and critical overview of these novel management strategies for rectal cancer.

Biofeedback combined with percutaneous electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for the treatment of low anterior rectal resection syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a distressing condition that affects approximately 25-80% of patients following surgery for rectal cancer. LARS is characterized by debilitating bowel dysfunction symptoms, including fecal incontinence, urgent bowel movements, and increased frequency of bowel movements. Although biofeedback therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in improving postoperative rectal control, the research results have not fulfilled expectations. Recent research has highlighted that stimulating the pudendal perineal nerves has a superior impact on enhancing pelvic floor muscle function than biofeedback alone. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a combined approach integrating biofeedback with percutaneous electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (B-PEPNS) in patients with LARS through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this two-armed multicenter RCT, 242 participants with LARS after rectal surgery will be randomly assigned to undergo B-PEPNS (intervention group) or biofeedback (control group). Over 4 weeks, each participant will undergo 20 treatment sessions. The primary outcome will be the LARS score. The secondary outcomes will be anorectal manometry and pelvic floor muscle electromyography findings and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) scores. Data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention (1 month), and follow-up (6 months). DISCUSSION: We anticipate that this study will contribute further evidence regarding the efficacy of B-PEPNS in alleviating LARS symptoms and enhancing the quality of life for patients following rectal cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clincal Trials Register ChiCTR2300078101. Registered 28 November 2023.

Qualitative exploration of home life experiences and care needs among elderly patients with temporary intestinal stomas.

BACKGROUND: This study employed a phenomenological research approach within qualitative research to explore the challenges encountered by elderly individuals with temporary colostomies in managing their daily lives and care needs. Protecting the anus surgery combined with temporary colostomy has emerged as a prevalent treatment modality for low rectal cancer. However, the ileostomy is susceptible to peri-stoma skin complications, as well as fluid, electrolyte, and nutritional imbalances, posing challenges to effective management. The successful self-management of patients is intricately linked to their adjustment to temporary colostomy; nonetheless, there remains a dearth of research examining the factors influencing self-care among temporary colostomy patients and the obstacles they confront. AIM: To investigate the lived experiences, perceptions, and care requirements of temporary colostomy patients within their home environment, with the ultimate goal of formulating a standardized management protocol. METHODS: Over the period of June to August 2023, a purposive sampling technique was utilized to select 12 patients with temporary intestinal stomas from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. Employing a phenomenological research approach, a semi-structured interview guide was developed, and qualitative interviews were conducted using in-depth interview techniques. The acquired data underwent coding, analysis, organization, and summarization following Colaizzi's seven-step method. RESULTS: The findings of this study revealed that the experiences and needs of patients with temporary intestinal stomas can be delineated into four principal themes: Firstly, Temporary colostomy patients bear various burdens and concerns about the uncertainty of disease progression; secondly, patients exhibit limited self-care capabilities and face information deficits, resulting in heightened reliance on healthcare professionals; thirdly, patients demonstrate the potential for internal motivation through proactive self-adjustment; and finally, patients express a significant need for emotional and social support. CONCLUSION: Home-living patients with temporary intestinal stomas confront multifaceted challenges encompassing burdens, inadequate self-care abilities, informational deficits, and emotional needs. Identifying factors influencing patients' self-care at home and proposing strategies to mitigate barriers can serve as a foundational framework for developing and implementing nursing interventions tailored to the needs of patients with temporary intestinal stomas.

Anatomic Basis of Rectal Cancer Staging: Clarifying Controversies and Misconceptions.

Rectal MRI provides a detailed depiction of pelvic anatomy; specifically, the relationship of the tumor to key anatomic structures, including the mesorectal fascia, anterior peritoneal reflection, and sphincter complex. However, anatomic inconsistencies, pitfalls, and confusion exist, which can have a strong impact on interpretation and treatment. These areas of confusion include the definition of the rectum itself, specifically differentiation of the rectum from the anal canal and the sigmoid colon, and delineation of the high versus low rectum. Other areas of confusion include the relative locations of the mesorectal fascia and peritoneum and their significance in staging and treatment, the difference between the mesorectal fascia and circumferential resection margin, involvement of the sphincter complex, and evaluation of lateral pelvic lymph nodes. The impact of these anatomic inconsistencies and sources of confusion is significant, given the importance of MRI in depicting the anatomic relationship of the tumor to critical pelvic structures, to triage surgical resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the goal of minimizing local recurrence. Evolving treatment paradigms also place MRI central in management of rectal cancer. ©RSNA, 2024.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after pathological complete response in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31,558 patients.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery (total mesorectal excision, TME). While achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) is a strong indicator of a positive prognosis, the specific benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after pCR remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential advantages of adjuvant therapy in patients who achieve pCR. METHODS: In this study, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant research. We focused on binary outcomes, analyzing them using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for potential variability between studies, all endpoints were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and employed the R statistical software (version 4.2.3) for all analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies, comprising 31,558 patients, were included. The outcomes demonstrated a significant difference favoring the AC group in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p = 0.015; I2 = 0%), and OS in 5 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.24; p = 0.001; I2 = 39%). There was no significant difference between the groups for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.17; p = 0.61; I2 = 17%), DFS in 5 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.82-1.74; p = 0.36; I2 = 43%), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87-1.40; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%), and relapse-free survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant difference in favor of the ACT group in terms of survival after pCR. Therefore, the administration of this treatment as adjuvant therapy should be encouraged in clinical practice.

Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) protocols (ie, preoperative chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy) may allow better adherence and early treatment of distant micrometastases and may increase pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of TNT protocols for LARC. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science Core Collection electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies were searched from inception to March 2, 2024. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials including adults with LARC who underwent rectal resection as a final treatment were included. Studies including nonoperative treatment (watch-and-wait strategy), treatments other than rectal resection, immunotherapy, or antiangiogenic agents were excluded. Among the initially identified studies, 2.9% met the selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently screened the records and extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-compliant pairwise and network meta-analyses with a random-effects model were performed in a frequentist framework, and the certainty of evidence was assessed according to the confidence in network meta-analysis approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pCR, defined as the absence of residual tumor at pathological assessment after surgery. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, toxic effects, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival. Results: Of 925 records identified, 27 randomized clinical trials, including 13 413 adults aged 18 years or older (median age, 60.0 years [range, 42.0-63.5 years]; 67.2% male) contributed to the primary network meta-analysis. With regard to pCR, long-course chemoradiotherapy (L-CRT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (relative risk [RR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.25-3.06), short-course radiotherapy (S-RT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.30), and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.25) outperformed standard L-CRT with single-agent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Considering 3-year disease-free survival, S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24) outperformed L-CRT, in spite of an increased 5-year locoregional recurrence rate of S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.03-2.63). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, 3 TNT protocols were identified to outperform the current standard of care in terms of pCR rates, with good tolerability and optimal postoperative outcomes, suggesting they should be recognized as first-line treatments.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The usefulness of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been reported; however, few reports exist on robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery to determine their usefulness in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CRT and robotic (22 patients) or laparoscopic APR (21 patients) between December 2012 and September 2022. We examined the short- and long-term outcomes in the robotic and laparoscopic groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up durations were 36 and 48 months for the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. No significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or overall complication rates were observed. However, the incidence of organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (9.1% vs. 38.1%, p=0.034) and the 3-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (95% vs. 67%, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Robotic APR was associated with a significantly lower rate of organ/space SSIs than the laparoscopic approach, indicating the usefulness of the robotic approach.

Mild hyperthermia with magnetic resonance- guided high intensity focused ultrasound combined with salvage chemoradiation for recurrent rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic recurrences from rectal cancer present a challenging clinical scenario. Hyperthermia represents an innovative treatment option in combination with concurrent chemoradiation to enhance therapeutic effect. We provide the initial results of a prospective single center feasibility study (NCT02528175) for patients undergoing rectal cancer retreatment using concurrent chemoradiation and mild hyperthermia with MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU). METHODS: All patients were deemed ineligible for salvage surgery and were evaluated in a multidisciplinary fashion with a surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist and medical oncologist. Radiation was delivered to a dose of 30.6 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction with concurrent capecitabine. MR-HIFU was delivered on days 1, 8 and 15 of concurrent chemoradiation. Our primary objective was feasibility and toxicity. RESULTS: Six patients (total 11 screened) were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and mild hyperthermia with MR-HIFU. Tumor size varied between 3.1-16.6 cm. Patients spent an average of 228 min in the MRI suite and sonication with the external transducer lasted an average of 35 min. There were no complications on the day of the MR-HIFU procedure and all acute toxicities (no grade >/=3 toxicities) resolved after completion of treatment. There were no late grade >/=3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Mild hyperthermia with MR-HIFU, in combination with concurrent chemoradiation for appropriately selected patients, is safe for localized pelvic recurrences from rectal cancer. The potential for MR-HIFU to be applied in the recurrent setting in rectal cancer treatment requires further technical development and prospective evaluation.

[Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on peritoneal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection].

Objective: To study the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on peritoneal wound recovery after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 219 patients who had been pathologically diagnosed with low rectal cancer and undergone APR in the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2018 and December 2021. Of these patients, 158 had undergone surgery without any pre-surgical treatment (surgery group), 35 had undergone surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group), and 26 had undergone surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group). The primary outcome was perineal wound complications occurring within 30 days. The status of wound healing was classified into the following three levels: Level A: abnormal wound seepage that improved after wound discharge; Level B: wound infection and dehiscence; and Level C: Level B plus fever. The patients' general condition, tumor status, perianal wound healing level, and intra- and post-operative recovery were recorded. Results: None of the study patients had any complications during surgery. The duration of surgery was 240.0 (180.0-300.0) minutes, 240.0 (225.0-270.0) minutes and 270.0 (240.0-356.2) minutes in the surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (H=6.508, P=0.039). The rates of perineal wound complications were 34.6% (9/26) and (22.9%, 8/35)in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, being significantly higher than that in the surgery group (10.1%, 16/158). After adjusting for patient age and sex using a logistic regression model, the risk of complications was still higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy than in the surgery group (OR=4.6, 95%CI: 1.7-12.7; OR=2.6, 95%CI: 1.0-6.8), these differences being statistically significant (both P<0.05). The duration of hospital stay was 9.5 (7.0-12.0) days, 10.0 (8.0-17.0) days and 11.5 (9.0-19.5) days for patients in the surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (H=0.569, P=0.752). However, after adjusting for patient age and sex by using a generalized linear model, hospital stay was longer in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy than in the surgery group (ß [95% CI]: 4.4 [0.5-8.4], P=0.028). After surgery, 155 of 219 patients required further adjuvant chemotherapy. A higher proportion of patients with than without wound complications did not attend for follow-up (32.2% [10/31] vs. 16.1% [20/124]); this difference is statistically significant (χ2=4.133, P=0.023). Conclusions: In patients with low rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy may be associated with an increased risk of perineal wound infection and non-healing.

[Retrospective study of role of neoadjuvant rectal scores in evaluating the 10-year disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery].

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and long-term survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Clinical and pathological data of 487 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from October 2004 to April 2014 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed and the impact of NAR score on prognosis studied. Disease-free-survival (DFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and survivals compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive capability of NAR and tumor regression grade scores for the risk of 10-year postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two scores. Results: Of the 487 patients included in the study, 166 were men (34.1%). The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46-63). All patients completed adequate preoperative chemoradiotherapy and underwent R0 resection.The median interval between the end of chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 51 days (IQR: 44-58). Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging occurred in 329 patients (67.6%). Tumor regression grades (TRGs) were 1-2 in 246 patients (50.5%) and 3-4 in 241 patients (49.5%). A total of 394 patients (80.9%) received postoperative chemotherapy. NAR scores were <8 in 182 patients (37.4%), 8-16 in 180 (37.0%), and >16 in 125 (25.6%). The median follow-up time was 111.5 months (IQR: 70.7-133.7 months). One hundred and thirteen patients died of rectal cancer, among whom 13 patients developed local recurrence, 88 patients developed distant metastasis, and 12 patients had unknown recurrence patterns. The 10-year DFS and overall survival rate of f the whole group were 68.9% and 71.5% respectively. The 10-year DFS rates for patients with NAR scores <8, 8-16, and >16 were 85.1%, 80.5%, and 66.4%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the Dixon operation (HR=0.606, 95%CI: 0.408-0.902, P=0.014), and >16 (HR=2.569, 95%CI: 1.559-4.233, P<0.001) were independent predictors of the 10-year DFS of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (P<0.05 for all). In the entire patient cohort, the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve for NAR score predicting 10-year recurrence and metastasis was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.62-0.72), whereas the AUC for TRG score was 0.54 (95%CI: 0.49-0.60). The two scores differed significantly in accuracy (Z=-4.06, P<0.001), the NAR score being a significantly better predictor of risk of 10-year recurrence and metastasis than the TRG score. Conclusion: The NAR score is a reliable predictor of 10-year DFS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a systematic review.

Background: Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs). Results: Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.

Treatment trajectories of individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer: an interpretative phenomenological study.

Rectal cancer affects almost every aspect of an individual's daily life. However, there are gaps in understanding the complete spectrum of experiences spanning from diagnosis to recovery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the treatment trajectories of individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer. Adopting an interpretative phenomenological approach, seven participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth interviews that were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Study rigour was established following the four-dimension criteria of credibility, dependability, transferability and confirmability. Four prominent themes emerged from the participants' experiences of undergoing rectal cancer treatment: uncovering the inner battles; navigating the physical challenges; anchors of support and conquering the summit. These findings contribute to knowledge and practice by highlighting the importance of providing a comprehensive and individualised treatment plan for individuals that takes account of the physical and psycho-emotional implications of rectal cancer treatment.

"WATCH AND WAIT" STRATEGY IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WITH A COMPLETE CLINICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE.

BACKGROUND: The non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) has gained increasing attention. The "Watch and Wait" ("W&W") strategy allows one to avoid surgery-related reduction in the quality of life due to permanent pelvic organ dysfunction or irreversible stoma. Still, the oncological safety of this strategy is under evaluation. AIM: To share a single-center experience of the "W&W" strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective analysis of 125 patients who received nCRT in 2016-2021 was performed. Patients who met the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO, 2017) criteria of clinical complete response (cCR) and received non-operative management were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten patients (8%) were re-staged after nCRT as cCR and followed the "W&W" strategy. Patients' characteristics: 7 female, 3 male; mean age 67.3 years. Tumor characteristics: pre-treatment N+ was present in 7 cases; G1 adenocarcinoma in a majority of cases; mean tumor distance from the anal verge - 5.85 cm; mean tumor circumference - 71%; mean tumor length - 3.87 cm. The mean follow-up time was 30 months. Local regrowth or/and distant metastases developed in 3 cases. The 2-year disease-free survival was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients following the "W&W" strategy have benefited. However, to reduce the number of relapses, it is necessary to perform a more careful selection of patients.

Impact of lymph node retrieval on prognosis in elderly and non-elderly patients with T3-4/N+ rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The optimal number of lymph nodes to be resected in patients with rectal cancer who undergo radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial. This study evaluated the prognostic variances between elderly and non-elderly patients and determined the ideal number of lymph nodes to be removed in these patients. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) datasets were used to gather information on 7894 patients diagnosed with stage T3-4/N+ rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2019. Of these patients, 2787 were elderly and 5107 were non-elderly. A total of 152 patients from the Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were used for external validation. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated to determine the optimal quantity of lymph nodes for surgical resection. RESULTS: The study found significant differences in OS and CSS between elderly and non-elderly patients, both before and after adjustment for confounders (P < 0.001). The removal of 14 lymph nodes may be considered a benchmark for patients with stage T3-4/N+ rectal cancer who undergo radical surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, as this number provides a more accurate foundation for the personalized treatment of rectal cancer. External data validated the differences in OS and CSS and supported the 14 lymph nodes as a new benchmark in these patients. CONCLUSION: For patients with T3-4/N+ stage rectal cancer who undergo radical surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the removal of 14 lymph nodes serves as a cutoff point that distinctly separates patients with a favorable prognosis from those with an unfavorable one.

Prognostic analysis of rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: different prognostic factors in patients with different TRGs.

PURPOSE: The extent of tumor regression varies widely among locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). The purpose of this retrospectively study is to assess prognostic factors in LARC patients with NCRT, and further to analyze survival outcomes in patients with different tumor regression grades (TRGs). METHODS: This study includes LARC patients who underwent NCRT and TME at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and survival of all patients, and performed subgroup analysis for patients with different TRGs. Survival differences were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test. Additionally, a multiple Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The study included 393 patients, with 21.1%, 26.5%, 45.5%, and 6.9% achieving TRG 0, TRG 1, TRG 2, and TRG 3, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate for all patients were 89.4% and 70.7%, respectively. Patients who achieved TRG 0-3 had different 5-year OS rates (96.9%, 91.1%, 85.2%, and 68.8%, P = 0.001) and 5-year DFS rates (80.8%, 72.4%, 67.0%, 55.8%, P = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was an independent prognostic indicator for both overall survival (OS) (HR = 4.040, 95% CI = 1.792-9.111, P = 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.971, 95% CI = 1.478-2.628, P ˂ 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, the NAR score was found to be associated with DFS in patients with TRG 1 and TRG 2. After conducting multivariate analysis, it was found that ypT stage was a significant predictor of DFS for TRG 1 patients (HR = 4.384, 95% CI = 1.721-11.168, P = 0.002). On the other hand, ypN stage was identified as the dominant prognostic indicator of DFS for TRG 2 patients (HR = 2.795, 95% CI = 1.535-5.091, P = 0.001). However, none of these characteristics was found to be correlated with survival in patients with TRG 0 or TRG 3. CONCLUSION: NAR score, in particular, appears to be the most powerful prognostic factor. It is important to consider various prognostic predictors for patients with different TRGs.

Rectal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation: A case report of pathological complete response.

RATIONALE: Treatment strategies for rectal squamous cell carcinoma (rSCC) are yet to be established, given its rarity. Although squamous cell carcinoma has been reported to be highly sensitive to cetuximab and radiation, there is no report of combination therapy of cetuximab and radiation for rSCC. In this study, we firstly reported a case of rSCC in which a complete response was achieved with the original chemoradiotherapy comprising oxaliplatin, S-1, cetuximab, and simultaneous radiation. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 46-year-old women presented to our hospital with lower abdominal pain and fatigue. DIAGNOSES: Based on tumor marker analyses, histological examination of biopsy specimens, and comprehensive imaging, the patient was diagnosed with rSCC. INTERVENTIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was administered in 28 fractions, along with concurrent chemotherapy comprising SOX (S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1-5 and 8-12, oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2, day 1) and cetuximab (400 mg/m2, day 1, 250 mg/m2, after day 8). OUTCOMES: Five weeks after chemoradiation, the patient underwent laparoscopic partial intersphincteric resection, achieving a complete pathological response. LESSONS: This case firstly highlights the usefulness of SOX plus cetuximab combined with radiation in the treatment of locally advanced rSCC. However, a large-scale study is required to establish safe and effective treatment regimens.

Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Response in Rectal Cancer Using MR Images and Deep Learning Neural Networks.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to develop deep-learning neural networks to guide treatment decisions and for the accurate evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer using magnetic resonance (MR) images. METHODS: Fifty-nine tumors with stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer that received nCRT were retrospectively evaluated. Pathological tumor regression grading was carried out using the Dworak (Dw-TRG) guidelines and served as the ground truth for response predictions. Imaging-based tumor regression grading was performed according to the MERCURY group guidelines from pre-treatment and post-treatment para-axial T2-weighted MR images (MR-TRG). Tumor signal intensity signatures were extracted by segmenting the tumors volumetrically on the images. Normalized histograms of the signatures were used as input to a deep neural network (DNN) housing long short-term memory (LSTM) units. The output of the network was the tumor regression grading prediction, DNN-TRG. RESULTS: In predicting complete or good response, DNN-TRG demonstrated modest agreement with Dw-TRG (Cohen's kappa= 0.79) and achieved 84.6% sensitivity, 93.9% specificity, and 89.8% accuracy. MR-TRG revealed 46.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 76.3% accuracy. In predicting a complete response, DNN-TRG showed slight agreement with Dw-TRG (Cohen's kappa= 0.75) with 71.4% sensitivity, 97.8% specificity, and 91.5% accuracy. MR-TRG provided 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 86.4% accuracy. DNN-TRG benefited from higher sensitivity but lower specificity, leading to higher accuracy than MR-TRG in predicting tumor response. CONCLUSION: The use of deep LSTM neural networks is a promising approach for evaluating the tumor response to nCRT in rectal cancer.

Management of internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes in mid-low rectal cancer.

In rectal cancer treatment, the diagnosis and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LLN) are critical for preventing local recurrence. Over time, scholars have reached a consensus: when imaging suggests LLN metastasis, combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with selective LLN dissection (LLND) can mitigate the risk of recurrence. Selective LLND typically encompasses lymph nodes in the internal iliac and obturator regions. Recent studies emphasize distinctions between internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes regarding prognosis and treatment outcomes, prompting the need for differentiated diagnostic and treatment approaches.