Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.256
Filter
1.
Psychiatr Prax ; 51(6): 335-338, 2024 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749452

ABSTRACT

Against the background of the discussion about a comprehensive regional mental health care service, the essay discusses the possibility of a comprehensive, transparent and meaningful evaluation. Proposals for how structures, processes, and outcomes may be assessed are presented. We argue for collecting data that are transparent and actionable on all levels of care organisations. The suggested evaluation would be innovative, meaningful for individual patients, services, health care organisations and whole regions, and thus a way for a data-driven ongoing quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Comprehensive Health Care , Mental Disorders , National Health Programs , Humans , Germany , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Comprehensive Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Intersectoral Collaboration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration
3.
Ital J Pediatr ; 47(1): 139, 2021 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The analysis of interregional healthcare mobility represents one of the main criteria for evaluating Regional Healthcare Systems, both in terms of its economic-financial relevance and the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. The aim of the study is to analyze healthcare mobility and its associated cost in Italy in 2019 for all children ≤ 14 years of age. METHODS: We collected data from the "Rapporto annuale sull'attività di ricovero ospedaliero - Dati SDO 2019" published by the Italian Ministry of Health. These data represent the tool for collecting information relating to all hospitalization services provided in accredited public and private hospitals present throughout the national territory. We collected data for all Italian regions and clustered them in two geographical areas: Center-North regions and South regions (including Sicily and Sardinia). We have analyzed the magnitude of the mobility of children among regions and in particular from the South to the Center-North and the relative cost of this interregional mobility. RESULTS:  The hospitalization rate of children residing in the South regions was higher than  that of children residing in the Center-North regions (13.9% vs 12.3%). Children residing in the South were more frequently treated in other regions than those living in the Center-North (11.9% vs 6.9%). Even considering the high complexity hospitalizations, children living in the South more frequently underwent treatment in other regions (21.3% vs 10.5% of the Center-North). The cost of passive mobility amounts to € 103.9 million for the South regions (15.1% of the total hospitalizations' expenditure) and the 87.1% of this cost refers to the mobility to the hospitals of Center-North. The cost of healthcare migration from South regions to other South regions was much lower (12.9%, equal to € 13.4 million). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare mobility, while affecting all Italian regions, is particularly relevant in the South regions and indicates a lack of pediatric care, which should be strengthened by creating services that are currently not evenly distributed throughout the territory.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Male , Quality of Health Care
4.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 4(1): e1301, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Timeliness of cancer care is vital for improved survival and quality of life of patients. Service and care centralisation at larger-volume centres has been associated with improved outcomes. However, there is a lack of systematic data on the impact of tumour stream volume on timeliness of care. AIMS: To investigate and compare timeliness of care for lung cancer, a high-volume (more commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, and oesophagogastric (OG) cancer, a low-volume (less commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, at a regional health service in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprising random samples of 75 people newly diagnosed with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 [ICD-10] diagnosis codes C34 in the Victorian Cancer Registry [VCR]) and 50 people newly diagnosed with OG cancer (ICD-10 diagnosis codes C15 or C16 in VCR) at one regional Victorian health service between 2016 and 2017. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between patient factors and suboptimal timeliness of care. RESULTS: In comparison to OG cancer patients, lung cancer patients had reduced odds of suboptimal timeliness of care in reference to times outside OCP for referral to diagnosis (OR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.14 to 0.83]) but increased odds of suboptimal timeliness for diagnosis to treatment (OR [95% CI] = 2.48 [1.01 to 6.09]). CONCLUSION: In the low-volume OG cancer stream, patients had longer wait times from referral to an MDM, where treatment decisions occur, but shorter time to commencement of first treatment. Conversely in the high-volume lung cancer group, there was delayed initiation of first treatment following presentation at MDM. There is need to explore ways to fast-track MDM presentation and commencement of therapy among people diagnosed with low-volume and high-volume cancers, respectively.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Regional Medical Programs/statistics & numerical data , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment , Victoria
5.
Acad Med ; 96(3): 409-415, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32618604

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Physician shortages and maldistribution, particularly within family medicine, have led many medical schools worldwide to create regional medical campuses (RMCs) for clerkship training. However, Canadian medical schools have developed a number of RMCs in which all years of training (i.e., a combined model that includes both preclerkship and clinical training) are provided geographically separate from the main campus. This study addresses the question: Are combined model RMC graduates more likely to enter postgraduate training in family medicine and rural-focused programs relative to main campus graduates? METHOD: The authors used a quasi-experimental research design and analyzed 2006-2016 data from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). Graduating students (N = 26,525) from 16 Canadian medical schools who applied for the CaRMS match in their year of medical school graduation were eligible for inclusion. The proportions of graduates who matched to postgraduate training in (1) family medicine and (2) rural-focused programs were compared for combined model RMCs and main campuses. RESULTS: Of RMC graduates, 48.4% matched to family medicine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46.1-50.7) compared with 37.1% of main campus graduates (95% CI = 36.5-37.7; P < .001). Of RMC graduates, 23.9% matched to rural-focused training programs (95% CI = 21.8-25.9) compared with 10.4% of main campus graduates (95% CI = 10.0-10.8; P < .001). Subanalyses ruled out a variety of potentially confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Combined model RMCs, in which all years of training take place away from the medical school's main campus, are associated with greater proportions of medical students entering family medicine postgraduate training and rural-focused training programs. These findings should encourage policymakers, health services agencies, and medical schools to continue seeking complements to academic medical center-based medical education.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/education , Physicians/supply & distribution , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Canada/epidemiology , Career Choice , Clinical Clerkship/methods , Education, Medical/trends , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Regional Medical Programs/trends , Rural Health Services/supply & distribution , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Workforce/trends
7.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(4): 536-543, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33383216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical quality improvement efforts are challenging due to the multidisciplinary nature of care, difficulties obtaining reliable data, and variability in quality metrics. The objective of this analysis was to assess whether participation in a regional collaborative quality initiative was associated with decreased in-hospital surgical complication in South Carolina. STUDY DESIGN: In-hospital surgical complication rates were determined using a statewide all-payer claims data set. Retrospective, univariate, and longitudinal multivariable analyses were performed and adjustments were made to account for aggregated hospital-level patient characteristics. RESULTS: The analysis included 275,387 general surgery cases performed in South Carolina hospitals between January 2016 and December 2018. Eight hospitals involved in the South Carolina Surgical Quality Collaborative (SCSQC) performed 56,179 cases and 51 non-SCSQC hospitals performed 219,208 cases. Univariate analysis revealed SCSQC hospitals performed operations in older patients (p < 0.0001) and patients with higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (p < 0.0001). SCSQC hospitals had higher mean in-hospital surgical complication rates at the surgery level compared with non-SCSQC hospitals (8.3% vs 7.0%; p < 0.0001). However, in multivariable analyses, the rate ratio for in-hospital surgical complication in SCSQC hospitals was 0.994 (95% CI, 0.989 to 0.998; p = 0.008) per month compared with non-SCSQC hospitals. This suggests a 21.6% (95% CI, 7.2% to 39.6%) proportional decrease in the rate of in-hospital surgical complication during 3 years associated with participation in the regional collaborative quality initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Structured collaboration between facilities, reliable data abstraction support, timely data review, and active member participation resulted in outcomes improvements for participating hospitals compared with hospitals that did not participate in a regional collaborative quality initiative.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration , Intersectoral Collaboration , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , South Carolina , Stakeholder Participation , Young Adult
8.
Pan Afr Med J ; 36: 329, 2020.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193983

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: sickle cell trait is the heterozygous form of sickle-cell disease. Patients with sickle cell trait can synthesize normal hemoglobin A and hemoglobin S. This condition has no recognizable clinical signs; then subjects with sickle cell trait, ignoring their genetic status, can be found among blood donors. This can have severe impact on donors´ health status and on that of recipients, especially if these have sickle-cell trait. The purpose of our study is to determine the prevalence of sickle cell trait in blood donors. METHODS: we conducted a 4-month descriptive prospective study (January-May 2017) at the Haute Matsiatra Regional Blood Transfusion Center (RBTC). All donors were screened by Emmel test and positive cases were confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. RESULTS: the study involved 427 donors, of whom 332 were men and 95 women (sex ratio 3.4). The average age of blood donors was 32.72, ranging from 18 to 64 years. Emmel test was positive in 5 donors (1.17%). These patients had the AS genotype confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. CONCLUSION: the results of this study reveal the presence of sickle cell trait among blood donors at the CRTS. Most of them ignore their sickle cell status before blood donation. Quality and safety of blood and blood products are mandatory, hence the importance of screening among blood donors is a current relevant issue.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Sickle Cell Trait/blood , Sickle Cell Trait/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/blood , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Blood Banks/organization & administration , Blood Banks/statistics & numerical data , Blood Transfusion , Female , Humans , Madagascar/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(11): e2025874, 2020 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196809

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cardiac care regionalization, specifically for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), has been touted as a potential mechanism to reduce systematic disparities by protocolizing the treatment of these conditions. However, it is unknown whether such regionalization arrangements have widened or narrowed disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes for minority communities. Objective: To determine the extent to which disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes have changed for patients with STEMI living in zip codes that are in the top tertile of the Black or Hispanic population compared with patients in nonminority zip codes in regionalized vs nonregionalized counties. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a quasi-experimental approach exploiting the different timing of regionalization across California. Nonpublic inpatient data for all patients with STEMI from January 1, 2006, to October 31, 2015, were analyzed using a difference-in-difference-in-differences estimation approach. Exposure: Exposure to the intervention was defined as on and after the year a patient's county was exposed to regionalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospital, receipt of PCI on the same day and at any time during the hospitalization, and time-specific all-cause mortality. Results: This study included 139 494 patients with STEMI; 61.9% of patients were non-Hispanic White, 5.6% Black, 17.8% Hispanic, and 9.0% Asian; 32.8% were women. Access to PCI-capable hospitals improved by 6.3 percentage points (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.1 percentage points; P < .001) when patients in nonminority communities were exposed to regionalization. Patients in minority communities experienced a 1.8-percentage point smaller improvement in access (95% CI, -2.8 to -0.8 percentage points; P < .001), or 28.9% smaller, compared with those in nonminority communities when both were exposed to regionalization. Regionalization was associated with an improvement to same-day PCI and in-hospital PCI by 5.1 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.1 percentage points; P < .001) and 5.0 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.9 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, for patients in nonminority communities. Patients in minority communities experienced only 33.3% and 15.1% of that benefit. Only White patients in nonminority communities experienced mortality improvement from regionalization. Conclusions and Relevance: Although regionalization was associated with improved access to PCI hospitals and receipt of PCI treatment, patients in minority communities derived significantly smaller improvement relative to those in nonminority communities.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Minority Groups , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Residence Characteristics , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time-to-Treatment , White People
10.
Age Ageing ; 49(4): 516-522, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725209

ABSTRACT

Older people are particularly affected by the COVID-19 outbreak because of their vulnerability as well as the complexity of health organisations, particularly in the often-compartmentalised interactions between community, hospital and nursing home actors. In this endemic situation, with massive flows of patients requiring holistic management including specific and intensive care, the appropriate assessment of each patient's level of care and the organisation of specific networks is essential. To that end, we propose here a territorial organisation of health care, favouring communication between all actors. This organisation of care is based on three key points: To use the basis of territorial organisation of health by facilitating the link between hospital settings and geriatric sectors at the regional level.To connect private, medico-social and hospital actors through a dedicated centralised unit for evaluation, geriatric coordination of care and decision support. A geriatrician coordinates this multidisciplinary unit. It includes an emergency room doctor, a supervisor from the medical regulation centre (Centre 15), an infectious disease physician, a medical hygienist and a palliative care specialist.To organise an ad hoc follow-up channel, including the necessary resources for the different levels of care required, according to the resources of the territorial network, and the creation of a specific COVID geriatric palliative care service. This organisation meets the urgent health needs of all stakeholders, facilitating its deployment and allows the sustainable implementation of a coordinated geriatric management dynamic between the stakeholders on the territory.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Health Services for the Aged , Pandemics , Patient Care Management , Pneumonia, Viral , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Aged , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Community Networks/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , France/epidemiology , Health Care Rationing/trends , Health Services for the Aged/ethics , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Health Services for the Aged/trends , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Palliative Care/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Care Management/ethics , Patient Care Management/organization & administration , Patient Care Management/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Semantic Web , Stakeholder Participation
12.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(1): 276-283, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32184113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current literature favors a volume-outcome relationship in pulmonary lobectomy that prompted centralization of these operations abroad, in national, single-payer health care settings. This study examined the impact of regionalization on outcomes after lung cancer resection within a US integrated health care system. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed major pulmonary resections (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy) for lung cancer that were performed before (2011 to 2013; n = 782) and after (2015 to 2017; n = 845) thoracic surgery regionalization during 2014. RESULTS: Case migration from 16 regionwide sites to 5 designated centers was complete by 2016. Facility volume increased from 17.4 to 48.3 cases/y (P = .002), and surgeon volume increased from 12.5 to 19.9 cases/y (P = .001). The postregionalization era was characterized by increased video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (86% from 57%; P < .001), as well as decreased intensive care unit use (-1.0 days; P < .001) and hospital length of stay (-3.0 days; P < .001). Postregionalization patients experienced fewer total (26.2% from 38.6%; P < .001) and major (9.6% from 13.6%; P = .01) complications. The association between regionalization and decreased length of stay and morbidity was independent of surgical approach and case volume in mixed multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: After the successful implementation of thoracic surgery regionalization in our US health care network, pulmonary resection volume increased, and practice shifted to majority video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and minimum intensive care unit utilization. Regionalization was independently associated with significant reductions in length of stay and morbidity.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted , Aged , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 35(1): 262-279, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31670417

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The Italian general practitioners (GPs) are not directly employed by the National Health Service but work as independent contractors. Their activity and their salary are managed at the national, regional, and local level. This paper analyses the Tuscany Region case study to investigate if primary care's target-setting styles are associated with different GP perceptions, by comparing nine different local agreements to a survey on 102 GPs. We propose a classification of the different target-setting (ideal typical) styles, ranging from "financial governance" (FG), mainly based on financial targets, to "clinical governance" (CG), that mainly relies on clinical and quality targets. FINDINGS: Results show that GPs are more likely to have a more favourable attitude toward primary care managerial tools if they have certain characteristics, ie, quality measures. This suggest that target setting system might promote both the GPs' compliance to the targets set by the agreement and the involvement of the GPs in the LHA's governance processes too. CONCLUSIONS: The managerial tools could pave the way to overcome the classical "trade unionist" relationship between the regional and local authority and the GPs, working as a "trait d'union" between the two players.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Reimbursement, Incentive
15.
ANZ J Surg ; 89(12): 1620-1625, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31637831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On 4 September 2017, patient care was relocated from one quaternary hospital that was closing, to another proximate greenfield site in Adelaide, Australia, this becoming the new Royal Adelaide Hospital. There are currently no data to inform how best to transition hospitals. We conducted a 12-week prospective study of admissions under our acute surgical unit to determine the impact on our key performance indicators. We detail our results and describe compensatory measures deployed around the move. METHODS: Using a standard proforma, data were collected on key performance indicators for acute surgical unit patients referred by the emergency department (ED). This was supplemented by data obtained from operative management software and coding data from medical records to build a database for analysis. RESULTS: Five hundred and eight patients were admitted during the study period. Significant delays were seen in times to surgical referral, surgical review and leaving the ED. Closely comparable was time spent in the surgical suite. Uptake of the Ambulatory Care Pathway fell by 67% and the Rapid Access Clinic by 46%. Overall mortality and patient length of stay were not affected. CONCLUSION: We found the interface with ED was most affected. Staff encountered difficulties familiarizing with a new environment and an anecdotally high number of ED presentations. Delays to referral and surgical review resulted in extended patient stay in ED. Once in theatre, care was comparable pre- and post-transition. This was likely from early identification of patients requiring an emergency operation, close consultant surgeon involvement and robust working relationships between surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Hospitalization , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , South Australia , Workflow
16.
Healthc Policy ; 15(1): 40-52, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of deferring critically ill children in referral hospitals away from their designated pediatric critical care unit (PCCU) on patients and the healthcare system is unknown. We aimed to identify factors associated with deferrals and patient outcomes and to study the impact of a referral policy implemented to balance PCCU bed capacity with regional needs. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of admissions to a PCCU following inter-facility transport from 2004 to 2016 in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Of 10,639 inter-facility transfers, 24.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.5-26.1%) were deferred during pre-implementation and 16.0% (95% CI: 15.1-16.9%) during post-implementation of a referral policy. Several factors, including previous intensive care unit admissions, residence location, presenting hospital factors, patient co-morbidities, specific designated PCCUs and winter (versus summer) season, were associated with deferral status. Deferrals were not associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Deferral from a designated PCCU does not confer an increased risk of death. Implementation of a referral policy was associated with a consistent referral pattern in 84% of transfers.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Illness/therapy , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/organization & administration , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Transportation of Patients/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/trends , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Male , Ontario , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Regional Medical Programs/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Transportation of Patients/statistics & numerical data
17.
Updates Surg ; 71(4): 645-651, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31506895

ABSTRACT

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is increasingly performed in high-volume centers, which may compromise waiting times. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient flow and outcome of PD within a regional oncology network of two high-volume centers. A post hoc analysis of a partially retrospective and prospective database was performed of all patients who underwent PD for pancreatic or periampullary neoplasms in both centers of the Gastrointestinal Oncology Center Amsterdam, a collaboration between an academic center and affiliated general teaching hospital, from 2010 to 2014. Outcomes included waiting time to surgery and postoperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 525 PDs were performed, 329 in the academic center (annual volume 66) and 196 in the teaching hospital (annual volume 39). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often used in the academic center, other baseline characteristics were similar. Overall time to surgery was 26 days, which was significantly less in the teaching hospital. The major postoperative morbidity rate was 38.3% (n = 201), and the 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.3% and 3.6%. A regional oncology network between an academic center and a general teaching hospital for PD can be an attractive option to safeguard waiting times in selected patients, without compromising outcome.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Clinical Protocols , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists
18.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e026509, 2019 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31427314

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether any differential change in emergency admissions could be attributed to integrated care by comparing pioneer and non-pioneer populations from a pre-pioneer baseline period (April 2010 to March 2013) over two follow-up periods: to 2014/2015 and to 2015/2016. DESIGN: Difference-in-differences analysis of emergency hospital admissions from English Hospital Episode Statistics. SETTING: Local authorities in England classified as either pioneer or non-pioneer. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency admissions to all NHS hospitals in England with local authority determined by area of residence of the patient. INTERVENTION: Wave 1 of the integrated care and support pioneer programme announced in November 2013. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in hospital emergency admissions. RESULTS: The increase in the pioneer emergency admission rate from baseline to 2014/2015 was smaller at 1.93% and significantly different from that of the non-pioneers at 4.84% (p=0.0379). The increase in the pioneer emergency admission rate from baseline to 2015/2016 was again smaller than for the non-pioneers but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1879). CONCLUSIONS: It is ambitious to expect unequivocal changes in a high level and indirect indicator of health and social care integration such as emergency hospital admissions to arise as a result of the changes in local health and social care provision across organisations brought about by the pioneers in their early years. We should treat any sign that the pioneers have had such an impact with caution. Nevertheless, there does seem to be an indication from the current analysis that there were some changes in hospital use associated with the first year of pioneer status that are worthy of further exploration.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Demography , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Social Work , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Emergencies/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Female , Health Policy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Social Work/methods , Social Work/standards
19.
Health Expect ; 22(5): 1132-1143, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31373754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As citizens, patients and family members are participating in numerous and expanding roles in health system organizations, attention has turned to evaluating these efforts. The context-specific nature of engagement requires evaluation tools to be carefully designed for optimal use. We sought to address this need by assessing the appropriateness and feasibility of a generic tool across a range of health system organizations, engagement activities and patient groups. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods implementation research design to study the implementation of an engagement evaluation tool in seven health system organizations in Ontario, Canada focusing on two key implementation outcome variables: appropriateness and feasibility. Data were collected through respondent feedback questions (binary and open-ended) at the end of the tool's three questionnaires as well as interviews and debriefing discussions with engagement professionals and patient partners from collaborating organizations. RESULTS: The three questionnaires comprising the evaluation tool were collectively administered 29 times to 405 respondents yielding a 52% response rate (90% and 53% of respondents respectively assessed the survey's appropriateness and feasibility [quantitatively or qualitatively]). The questionnaires' basic properties were rated highly by all respondents. Concrete suggestions were provided for improving the appropriateness and feasibility of the questionnaires (or components within) for different engagement activity and organization types, and for enhancing the timing of implementation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings offer guidance for health system organizations and evaluators to support the optimal use of engagement evaluation tools across a variety of health system settings, engagement activities and respondent groups.


Subject(s)
Community Participation/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Services Research/methods , Patient Participation/methods , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
20.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 34(3): 1065-1072, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368130

ABSTRACT

The exploration and practice of the "1 + 10 + 1100000" model of local medical consortium includes three aspects: graded diagnosis and treatment, two-way referral, and dynamic flow; seamless connection between general practice and specialty to realize health management; and establishment of the "community health center-East Hospital-Tongji University" teaching platform.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , China , Community Health Services/organization & administration , General Practitioners/organization & administration , Humans , Program Evaluation , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL