ABSTRACT
The HIV Index is a validated self-report scale of engagement in HIV care previously correlated with future retention and virologic suppression. However, its performance in a monoethnic Latinx population has not been studied. We evaluated the HIV Index among Latinx persons living with HIV in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort and performed multivariable logistic regression to estimate its association with primary outcomes of suboptimal retention (not keeping 100% of HIV clinic appointments) and virologic suppression (HIV viral load <200 copies/mL). The mean Index score was 4.5 (standard deviation 0.6) in both analytic samples, indicative of feeling well-engaged. Higher Index scores were associated with lower odds of suboptimal retention (OR = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.54], p = .005), however, there was no association between Index score and virologic suppression. The HIV Index is useful for assessing engagement and retention among Latinx PLWH in routine care.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hispanic or Latino , Retention in Care , Viral Load , Humans , HIV Infections/ethnology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Male , Adult , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Self Report , Logistic Models , Cohort Studies , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HIV testing and starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) are pivotal in treating people living with HIV (PLHIV) but sustaining PLHIV on treatment remains challenging. We assessed retention and attrition in community client-led antiretroviral distribution groups (CCLADs) in Uganda and identified positive deviant practices that foster long-term retention. METHODS: Using explanatory mixed methods, we collected longitudinal medical data from 65 health facilities across 12 districts in East Central Uganda. Quantitative phase, from 18 April 2021 to 30 May 2021, employed survival analysis and Cox regression to assess retention and identify attrition risk factors. Qualitative inquiry focused on four districts with high attrition from 11 August 2021 to 20 September 2021, where we identified nine health facilities exhibiting high retention in CCLADs. We purposively selected 50 clients for in-depth interviews (n=22) or focus group discussions (n=28). Using thematic analysis, we identified positive deviant practices. We integrated quantitative and qualitative findings into joint displays. RESULTS: Involving 3055 PLHIV, the study showed retention rates of 97.5% at 6 months, declining to 89.7% at 96 months. Attrition risk factors were lower levels of care (health centre three (adjusted HR (aHR) 2.80, 95% CI 2.00 to 3.65) and health centre four (aHR 3.61, 95% CI 2.35 to 5.54)); being unemployed (aHR 2.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.84); enrolment year into CCLAD (aHR 23.93, 95% CI 4.66 to 123.05) and virological failure (aHR 3.41, 95% CI 2.51 to 4.63). Of 22 clients interviewed, 8 were positive deviants. Positive deviants were characterised by prolonged retention in CCLADs, improved clinical outcomes and practised uncommon behaviours that enabled them to find better solutions than their peers. Positive deviant practices included fostering family-like settings, offering financial or self-development advice, and promoting healthy lifestyles. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the importance of addressing factors contributing to attrition and leveraging positive deviant practices to optimise retention and long-term engagement in HIV care.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Humans , Uganda , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Focus Groups , Qualitative Research , Medication Adherence , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Importance: The high prevalence of hypertension calls for broad, multisector responses that foster prevention and care services, with the goal of leveraging high-quality treatment as a means of reducing hypertension incidence. Health care system improvements require stakeholder input from across the care continuum to identify gaps and inform interventions that improve hypertension care service, delivery, and retention; system dynamics modeling offers a participatory research approach through which stakeholders learn about system complexity and ways to model sustainable system-level improvements. Objective: To assess the association of simulated interventions with hypertension care retention rates in the Nigerian primary health care system using system dynamics modeling. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model used a participatory research approach involving stakeholder workshops conducted in July and October 2022 to gather insights and inform the development of a system dynamics model designed to simulate the association of various interventions with retention in hypertension care. The study focused on the primary health care system in Nigeria, engaging stakeholders from various sectors involved in hypertension care, including patients, community health extension workers, nurses, pharmacists, researchers, administrators, policymakers, and physicians. Exposure: Simulated intervention packages. Main Outcomes and Measures: Retention rate in hypertension care at 12, 24, and 36 months, modeled to estimate the effectiveness of the interventions. Results: A total of 16 stakeholders participated in the workshops (mean [SD] age, 46.5 [8.6] years; 9 [56.3%] male). Training of health care workers was estimated to be the most effective single implementation strategy for improving retention in hypertension care in Nigeria, with estimated retention rates of 29.7% (95% CI, 27.8%-31.2%) at 12 months and 27.1% (95% CI, 26.0%-28.3%) at 24 months. Integrated intervention packages were associated with the greatest improvements in hypertension care retention overall, with modeled retention rates of 72.4% (95% CI, 68.4%-76.4%), 68.1% (95% CI, 64.5%-71.7%), and 67.1% (95% CI, 64.5%-71.1%) at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This decision analytical model study showed that community-based participatory research could be used to estimate the potential effectiveness of interventions for improving retention in hypertension care. Integrated intervention packages may be the most promising strategies.
Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research , Hypertension , Primary Health Care , Humans , Hypertension/therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Nigeria , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality ImprovementABSTRACT
We describe the results of a pilot randomized clinical trial of a mobile phone-based intervention, InTSHA: Interactive Transition Support for Adolescents with HIV, compared to standard care. Encrypted, closed group chats delivered via WhatsApp provided peer support and improved communication between adolescents with HIV, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. We randomized 80 South African adolescents ages 15 to 19 years with perinatally-acquired HIV to receive either the intervention (n=40) or standard of care (n=40). We measured acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure [AIM]) and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure [FIM]) as primary outcomes. We evaluated impact on retention in care and viral suppression six months after randomization as secondary endpoints. We performed bivariable and multivariable analyses using logistic regression models to assess the effect of the InTSHA intervention compared to standard of care. Among the adolescents randomized to the InTSHA intervention, the median AIM was 4.1/5.0 (82%) and median FIM was 3.9/5.0 (78%). We found no difference in retention in care or in viral suppression comparing intervention and control groups. Among adolescents who attended three or more sessions, retention in care was 100% at 6 months. InTSHA is an acceptable and feasible mHealth intervention warranting further study in a larger population.
Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , HIV Infections , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Retention in Care , Telemedicine , Humans , Adolescent , HIV Infections/psychology , Male , South Africa , Female , Pilot Projects , Young Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Viral Load , Cell PhoneABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe rates of retention in care and control of hypertension, diabetes and HIV among participants receiving integrated care services for a period of up to 24 months in East Africa. METHODS: Between 5 October 2018 and 23 June 2019 participants enrolled into a prospective cohort study evaluating the feasibility of integrated care delivery for HIV, diabetes and hypertension from a single point of care in Tanzania and Uganda (MOCCA study). Integrated care clinics were established in 10 primary healthcare facilities and care was provided routinely according to national guidelines. Initial follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were rates of retention in care, proportions of participants with controlled hypertension (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg), diabetes (fasting blood glucose <7.0 mmol/L) and HIV (plasma viral load <1000 copies/ml). The study coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic response. Afterwards, all participants were approached for extended follow-up by a further 12 months in the same clinics. We evaluated outcomes of the cohort at the end of long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The MOCCA study enrolled 2273 participants of whom 1911 (84.5%) were retained in care after a median follow-up of 8 months (Interquartile range: 6.8-10.7). Among these, 1283/1911 (67.1%) enrolled for a further year of follow-up, 458 (24.0%) were unreachable, 71 (3.7%) reverted to vertical clinics (clinics providing services dedicated to study conditions), 31 (1.6%) died and 68 (3.6%) refused participation. Among participants who enrolled for longer follow-up, mean age was 51.4 ± 11.7 years, 930 (72.5%) were female and 509 (39.7%) had multiple chronic conditions. Overall, 1236 (96.3%) [95% confidence interval 95.2%-97.3%] participants were retained in care, representing 1236/2273 (54.3%) [52.3%-56.4%] of participants ever enrolled in the study. Controlled hypertension, diabetes and HIV at the end of follow-up was, 331/618 (53.6%) [49.5%-57.5%], 112/354 (31.6%) [26.8%-36.8%] and 332/343 (96.7%) [94.3%-98.4%] respectively. CONCLUSION: Integrated care can achieve high rates of retention in care long term, but control of blood pressure and blood sugar remains low.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Diabetes Mellitus , HIV Infections , Hypertension , Retention in Care , Humans , HIV Infections/therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Uganda , Tanzania , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Hypertension/therapy , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Noncommunicable Diseases/therapy , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Although research has continued to show that substance use disorders (SUDs) can be treated effectively with evidence-based treatment, there continues to be gaps in access, and utilization remains low. Alternative SUD treatment methods, including telemedicine, are increasingly being explored to reach patients where traditional in-person treatment approaches are inaccessible. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore SUD treatment retention, specifically comparing telemedicine-delivered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with a traditional in-person treatment delivery approach. METHODS: Patients at Cahaba Medical Care, an FQHC in Birmingham, AL with a diagnosis of OUD and undergoing buprenorphine/naloxone or buprenorphine treatment were categorized into two groups: treatment and control. The dependent variable, retention to SUD treatment, was assessed at four different time periods over 12 months to determine patient SUD consultation appointment attendance. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between SUD treatment retention and delivery mode. Correlations were obtained to assess associations between frequency of urine drug screens performed and SUD treatment retention. RESULTS: As the number of the urine drug screens patients received increased by 1, the number of SUD treatment program consultations patients attended increased by 0.69 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SUD treatment retention between traditional in-person and telemedicine delivered approaches, however. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that a telemedicine-delivered treatment program equals retention effectiveness when compared with in-person delivery. This suggests that leveraging telemedicine to treat patients with SUD could be an effective alternative for those unable to access treatment or who are less likely to attend or complete traditional in-person treatment sessions.
Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) study is a cluster-randomized trial implemented in 24 HIV care clinics in Kenya, aimed at improving retention in care for adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV). DiSC is a multi-component intervention that assigns AYLHIV to different intensity (steps) of services according to risk. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to characterize provider-identified adaptations to the implementation of DiSC to optimize uptake and delivery, and determine the influence on implementation outcomes. METHODS: Between May and December 2022, we conducted continuous quality improvement (CQI) meetings with providers to optimize DiSC implementation at 12 intervention sites. The meetings were guided by plan-do-study-act processes to identify challenges during early phase implementation and propose targeted adaptations. Meetings were audio-recorded and analysed using FRAME to categorize the level, context and content of planned adaptations and determine if adaptations were fidelity consistent. Providers completed surveys to quantify perceptions of DiSC acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to evaluate these implementation outcomes over time. RESULTS: Providers participated in eight CQI meetings per facility over a 6-month period. A total of 65 adaptations were included in the analysis. The majority focused on optimizing the integration of DiSC within the clinic (83%, n = 54), and consisted of improving documentation, addressing scheduling challenges and improving clinic workflow. Primary reasons for adaptation were to align delivery with AYLHIV needs and preferences and to increase reach among AYLHIV: with reminder calls to AYLHIV, collaborating with schools to ensure AYLHIV attended clinic appointments and addressing transportation challenges. All adaptations to optimize DiSC implementation were fidelity-consistent. Provider perceptions of implementation were consistently high throughout the process, and on average, slightly improved each month for intervention acceptability (ß = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.020, p = 0.016), appropriateness (ß = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.027, p<0.001) and feasibility (ß = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.022, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Provider-identified adaptations targeted improved integration into routine clinic practices and aimed to reduce barriers to service access unique to AYLHIV. Characterizing types of adaptations and adaptation rationale may enrich our understanding of the implementation context and improve abilities to tailor implementation strategies when scaling to new settings.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Humans , Kenya , HIV Infections/therapy , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Male , Female , Young Adult , Quality Improvement , Health Personnel , Retention in CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine is a feasible alternative to in-person evaluations for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). The literature on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) telemedicine has focused on ongoing OUD treatment. Emergency department (ED) visits are an opportunity to initiate MOUD; however, little is known regarding the outcomes of patients following telemedicine referrals for MOUD from emergency settings. The current study describes rates of initial outpatient clinic appointment attendance and 30-day retention in care among patients referred by telemedicine compared to ED referrals. METHODS: This paper reports a retrospective review of data for patients referred from EDs or telemedicine through the Medication for Addiction Treatment and Electronic Referrals (MATTERS) Network. The MATTERS online platform collects data on patient demographic information (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance type), reason for visit, prior medical and mental health history, prior OUD treatment history, and past 30-day substance use behaviors. Analyses compared initial visit attendance and 30-day retention among the patients for whom follow-up data were received from clinics by demographic and initial treatment factors. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and September 2022, the MATTERS Network made 1349 referrals; 39.7 % originated from an ED and 47.8 % originated from telemedicine. For patients with available data, those referred from telemedicine were 1.64 times more likely to attend their initial clinic appointment and 2.59 times more likely be engaged in treatment at 30 days compared to those referred from an ED. More than two-thirds of patients referred from the emergency telemedicine environment followed up at their first clinic visit and more than half of these patients were still retained in treatment 30 days after referral. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of initial clinic visit and 30-day retention when referred following a telemedicine evaluation are encouraging. Further development of telemedicine programs that offer evaluations, access to medications, and referrals to treatment should be considered.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Opioid-Related Disorders , Referral and Consultation , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: While randomized-controlled trials have shown that heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) is superior to methadone maintenance alone in treatment of refractory clients, little is known about client factors associated with retention in HAT in routine care. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed predictors of retention in first treatment episode among a consecutive cohort of clients admitted to HAT in Denmark from 2010 to 2018, who could be matched to the Danish population register and for whom a Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was available at admission (N = 432). The study derived predictors from client self-reports at intake and administrative data available in national registers. Cox proportional hazards regression modelled retention in treatment. RESULTS: The one-year retention rate was 69.63 % (95 % CI 65.06 %-73.74 %), and the median time in treatment was 2.45 years (95 % CI, 1.83-3.12). Bivariate analyses showed that retention was lower for clients who had recent cocaine or benzodiazepine use and among those who had experienced an overdose in the year prior to enrollment in HAT. Age below 40, recent illegal activity, poorer emotional wellbeing, previous residential treatment experience, and previous intensive outpatient treatment were also predictors of dropout from HAT. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study found that retention in HAT in routine care was similar to rates observed in randomized-controlled trials conducted in other countries. The results suggest that addressing polysubstance use as part of the HAT program may promote long-term retention, as may directing resources to certain subgroups identified at intake, including clients under 40 years and those who report recent criminal activity, emotional problems, or overdoses. The findings that previous residential treatment and intensive outpatient treatment were associated with dropout were unexpected.
Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Humans , Denmark/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Heroin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons receiving prescription buprenorphine for opioid use disorder experience high rates of comorbid conditions such as chronic pain and depression, which present barriers to buprenorphine care retention. This paper describes the protocol of the TOPPS (Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness) study, which compares a values-based, behavioral activation intervention with a health education contact-control condition, with the aim of decreasing chronic pain and depression, and increasing buprenorphine care retention for persons with opioid use disorder. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolls and randomizes up to 250 participants currently being treated with buprenorphine to receive three months of either TOPPS, a six-session phone-based behavioral intervention, or a health education (HE) control condition. We compare the TOPPS intervention to HE on the following outcomes: 1) pain interference and pain severity over the 3-month treatment phrase; 2) depressive symptoms over the 3-month treatment phase; and 3) sustained improvements in pain interference, depressive symptoms, and buprenorphine treatment retention over the 12-month study period. We also examine mechanisms by which the intervention may reduce pain interference. DISCUSSION: This RCT explores a novel intervention to address chronic pain and depression for individuals receiving buprenorphine in office-based settings. TOPPS may lead to improved pain, depression, and substance use outcomes, and can utilize providers available within buprenorphine programs, broadening the disseminability of this intervention and heightening its public health impact. CLINICAL TRIAL: #NCT03698669.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Buprenorphine , Chronic Pain , Depression , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Male , Retention in Care , Behavior Therapy/methods , Adult , Female , Health Education/organization & administration , Health Education/methods , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Poor adherence and retention in HIV care remain a major challenge among adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Strategies are urgently required to support AYA to remain in care for better health outcomes. We explored AYA preferences regarding the format and delivery of electronic and in-person peer navigation to improve HIV care outcomes. This formative qualitative study was conducted among AYA enrolled in HIV care at three clinics in western Kenya. We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) each with 8-9 participants (n = 17) purposively selected based on age, gender and clinic where they received care. The characteristics desired of a navigator are a person of the same age group and HIV status who has a good memory and is friendly and able to maintain confidentiality. AYA want the content of their interaction with the navigator to center on sharing motivational messages and also educating them on matters of HIV care, sexual and reproductive health and mental health. The preferred navigation formats for electronic communication are platforms considered confidential. AYA preferred interventions delivered through secure communication platforms by navigators with whom they have commonalities. The navigation interventions that prioritize confidentiality and holistic content will likely be most highly valued by AYA. Furthermore, electronic mechanisms can help support the relationship building that is at the core of our navigation approach and a fundamental aspect of social work in general.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , HIV Infections , Patient Navigation , Peer Group , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , HIV Infections/therapy , Young Adult , Kenya , Adult , Retention in CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities are evident in the accessibility of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Even when medications for OUD (MOUD) are accessible, racially and ethnically minoritized groups have higher attrition rates from treatment. Existing literature has primarily identified the specific racial and ethnic groups affected by these disparities, but has not thoroughly examined interventions to address this gap. Recovery peer navigators (RPNs) have been shown to improve access and overall retention on MOUD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluate the role of RPNs on patient retention in clinical care at an outpatient program in a racially and ethnically diverse urban community. Charts were reviewed of new patients seen from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical visit data, including which providers and services were utilized, were collected, and the primary outcome of interest was continuous retention in care. Bivariate analysis was done to test for statistically significant associations between variables by racial/ethnic group and continuous retention in care using Student's t-test or Pearson's chi-square test. Variables with p value ≤0.10 were included in a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: A total of 131 new patients were included in the study. RPNs improved continuous retention in all-group analysis (27.6% pre-RPN compared to 80.2% post-RPN). Improvements in continuous retention were observed in all racial/ethnic subgroups but were statistically significant in the non-Hispanic Black (NHB) group (p < 0.001). Among NHB, increases in continuous retention were observed post-RPN in patients with male sex (p < 0.001), public health insurance (p < 0.001), additional substance use (p < 0.001), medical comorbidities (p < 0.001), psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.001), and unstable housing (p = 0.005). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients who lacked insurance had lower odds of continuous retention compared to patients with public insurance (aOR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.039-0.70, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: RPNs can improve clinical retention for patients with OUD, particularly for individuals experiencing several sociodemographic and clinical factors that are typically correlated with discontinuation of care.
Recovery peer navigators improve continuous clinical retention following initiation of outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder.Recovery peer navigators may be especially beneficial for patients with factors and identifiers commonly associated with discontinuation of care.
Subject(s)
Buprenorphine , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders , Patient Navigation , Retention in Care , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Adult , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Patient Navigation/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Peer Group , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity , OutpatientsABSTRACT
Retention in care for people living with HIV (PLWH) is important for individual and population health. Preemptive identification of PLWH at high risk of lapsing in care may improve retention efforts. We surveyed providers at nine institutions throughout Chicago about their perspectives on using an electronic health record (EHR) tool to predict the risk of lapsing in care. Sixty-three percent (20/32) of providers reported currently assessing patients' risk for lapsing in care, and 91% (29/32) reported willingness to implement an EHR tool. When compared to those with other job roles, prescribers agreed (vs. neutral) that the tool would be less biased than personal judgment (OR 13.33, 95% CI 1.05, 169.56). Prescribers were also more likely to identify community health workers as persons who should deliver these interventions (OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.02, 108.58). Transportation, housing, substance use, and employment information were factors that providers wanted to be included in an EHR-based tool. Social workers were significantly more likely to indicate the inclusion of employment information as important (OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.11, 98.87) when compared to other participants. Acceptability of an EHR tool was high; future research should investigate barriers and evaluate the effectiveness of such a tool.
Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , HIV Infections , Humans , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Male , Female , Chicago , Feasibility Studies , Adult , Health Personnel/psychology , Middle Aged , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health PersonnelABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Treatment interruptions are a barrier to successful antiretroviral therapy (ART). 'Fresh start messages', which leverage significant days on the calendar (e.g., new year, public holiday) in order to prompt action, have the potential to encourage people with HIV (PWH) to return to care. We evaluated a 'fresh start' intervention (text messages) to increase return to care in PWH who had missed their last appointment. DESIGN: A three arm 1â:â1:1 individual randomised controlled trial. METHODS: We randomized adults in Capricorn District who had missed ART appointments by >28âdays to: no text message; unframed messages (fresh start not mentioned); or framed messages (fresh start mentioned). Randomization was stratified by treatment interruption duration and across two holidays (Youth Day, Mandela Day). The primary outcome was an ART-related clinic visit at ≤45âdays of the first message. RESULTS: 9143 participants were randomised. For Youth Day, 1474 and 1468 were sent unframed and framed messages respectively, with 13.4% sent these messages having an ART visit vs. 11.9% not sent a message [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-1.4, P -valueâ=â0.075]. For Mandela Day, 1336 and 1334 were sent unframed and framed messages respectively, with 6.7% sent these messages having an ART-related clinic visit vs. 5.4% not sent a message (aOR 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0-1.6; P -valueâ=â0.100). CONCLUSIONS: Low-cost text messages sent around a 'fresh start' date may increase the likelihood that patients who miss appointments return to care. This study suggests the potential of text messaging for motivating return to care.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Text Messaging , Humans , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Male , Female , South Africa , Adult , Middle Aged , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Retention in Care , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Injection Drug use is associated with increased HIV risk behaviour that may result in the transmission of HIV and poor access to HIV prevention and treatment. In 2020, Uganda introduced the 'medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment' for People who inject drugs (PWID). We analysed the 12-month retention and associated factors among PWID enrolled on MOUD treatment in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 343 PWID with OUD who completed 14 days of methadone induction from September 2020 to July 2022. Retention was defined as the number of individuals still in the programme divided by the total number enrolled, computed at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months using lifetable and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Cox proportional regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with retention in the programme in the first 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 243 (71%) of 343 participants stabilized at a methadone dose of 60 mg or more. The majority of participants were males (n = 284, 82.8%), and the median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 31 (26-38) years. Most participants (n = 276, 80.5%) lived 5 km or more away from the MOUD clinic. Thirty (8.8%) were HIV-positive, 52 (15.7%) had a major mental illness and 96 (27.9%) had a history of taking alcohol three months before enrollment. The cumulative retention significantly declined from 83.4% (95%CI = 79.0-87.0) at 3months to 71.9% (95%CI = 67.2-76.6) at 6months, 64% 95%CI = 58.7-68.9) at 9months, and 55.2%; 95% CI (49.8-60.3% at 12months. The 12-month retention was significantly higher for participants on methadone doses of 60 mg or more (adj.HR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.41-3.22), while participants resident within 5 km of the MOUD clinic were 4.9 times more likely to be retained at 12 months, compared to those residing 5 km or more, (adj. HR = 4.81, 95%CI = 1.54-15). Other factors, including predisposing, need, and enabling factors, were not associated with retention. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates acceptable 12-month retention rates for people who inject drugs, comparable to previous studies done in both developing and developed countries. Sustaining and improving retention may require enhanced scaling up of MOUD dose to an optimal level in the first 14 days and reducing the distance between participant locale and MOUD clinics.
Subject(s)
Methadone , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Male , Uganda/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Methadone/therapeutic use , Methadone/administration & dosage , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a life-threatening, chronic, autoimmune disease requiring long term subspecialty care due to its complex and chronic nature. Childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) is more severe than adult-onset, and the cSLE population in South Africa has been reported to have an even higher risk than patients elsewhere. Therefore, it is critical to promptly diagnose, treat, and manage cSLE. In this paper, we aim to describe and evaluate barriers and enablers of appropriate long-term care of cSLE South Africa from the perspective of caregivers (parents or family members). METHODS: Caregivers (n = 22) were recruited through pediatric and adult rheumatology clinics. Individuals were eligible if they cared for youth (≤ 19 years) who were diagnosed with cSLE and satisfied at least four of the eleven ACR SLE classification criteria. Individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted between January 2014 and December 2014, and explored barriers to and facilitators of ongoing chronic care for cSLE. Data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four barriers to chronic care engagement and retention were identified: knowledge gap, financial burdens, social stigma of SLE, and complexity of the South African medical system. Additionally, we found three facilitators: patient and caregiver education, robust support system for the caregiver, and financial support for the caregiver and patient. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight multiple, intersecting barriers to routine longitudinal care for cSLE in South Africa and suggest there might be a group of diagnosed children who don't receive follow-up care and are subject to loss to follow-up. cSLE requires ongoing treatment and care; thus, the different barriers may interact and compound over time with each follow-up visit. South African cSLE patients are at high risk for poor outcomes. South African care teams should work to overcome these barriers and place attention on the facilitators to improve care retention for these patients and create a model for other less resourced settings.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Qualitative Research , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/psychology , South Africa , Female , Male , Child , Caregivers/psychology , Adolescent , Health Services Accessibility , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Social Stigma , Adult , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In systemic lupus erythematosus, poor disease outcomes occur in young adults, patients identifying as Black or Hispanic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. These identities and social factors differentially shape care access and quality that contribute to lupus health disparities in the US. Thus, our objective was to measure markers of care access and quality, including rheumatology visits (longitudinal care retention) and lupus-specific serology testing, by race and ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and geographic context. METHODS: This cohort study used a geo-linked 20% national sample of young adult Medicare beneficiaries (ages 18-35) with lupus-coded encounters and a 1-year assessment period. Retention in lupus care required a rheumatology visit in each 6-month period, and serology testing required ≥1 complement or dsDNA antibody test within the year. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit for visit-based retention and serology testing to determine associations with race and ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and geography. RESULTS: Among 1,036 young adults with lupus, 39% saw a rheumatologist every 6 months and 28% had serology testing. White beneficiaries from the least disadvantaged quintile of neighborhoods had higher visit-based retention than other beneficiaries (64% vs 30%-60%). Serology testing decreased with increasing neighborhood disadvantage quintile (aOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71, 0.90) and in the Midwest (aOR 0.46; 0.30, 0.71). CONCLUSION: Disparities in care, measured by rheumatology visits and serology testing, exist by neighborhood disadvantage, race and ethnicity, and region among young adults with lupus, despite uniform Medicare coverage. Findings support evaluating lupus care quality measures and their impact on US lupus outcomes.
Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Medicare , Rheumatology , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , United States , Adult , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adolescent , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Logistic Models , Black or African American/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of three multimonth dispensing (3MMD) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on HIV care retention in southern Mozambique. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We analyzed routine health data from people with HIV (PWH) aged 10 years old and older who started ART between January 2018 and March 2021. Individuals were followed until December 2021. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare attrition (lost to follow-up, death, and transfer out) between 3MMD and monthly ART dispensing. Results were stratified by time on ART before 3MMD enrolment: 'early enrollers' (<6âmonths on ART) and 'established enrollers' (≥6âmonths on ART), and age groups: adolescents and youth (AYLHIV) (10-24âyears) and adults (≥25âyears). RESULTS: We included 7378 PWH (25% AYLHIV, 75% adults), with 59% and 62% enrolled in 3MMD, respectively. Median follow-up time was 11.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 5.7-21.6] months for AYLHIV and 10.2 (IQR: 4.8-20.9) for adults. Attrition was lower in PWH enrolled in 3MMD compared with monthly ART dispensing, in both established (aHR AYLHIVâ=â0.65; 95% CI: 0.54-0.78 and aHR adultsâ=â0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.56) and early enrollers (aHR AYLHIVâ=â0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85 and aHR adultsâ=â0.63; 95% CI: 0.57-0.70). Among individuals in 3MMD, male gender (aHRâ=â1.30; 95% CI: 1.18-1.44) and receiving care in a medium-volume/low-volume healthcare facility (aHRâ=â1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.34) increased attrition risk. Conversely, longer ART time before 3MMD enrolment (aHRâ=â0.93; 95% CI: 0.92-0.94 per 1 month increase) and age at least 45âyears (aHRâ=â0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.89) reduced risk of attrition. CONCLUSION: 3MMD improves retention in care compared with monthly dispensing among established and early enrollers, although to a lesser extent among the latter.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Retention in Care , Humans , Mozambique , Retrospective Studies , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Adolescent , Young Adult , Child , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Lost to Follow-UpABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the scale-up of Option B+, long-term retention of women in HIV care during pregnancy and the postpartum period remains an important challenge. We compared adherence to clinic appointments and antiretroviral therapy (ART) at 6 weeks, 6, and and 24 months postpartum among pregnant women living with HIV and initiating Option B+. Women were randomized to a peer group support, community-based drug distribution and income-generating intervention called "Friends for Life Circles" (FLCs) versus the standard of care (SOC). Our secondary outcome was infant HIV status and HIV-free survival at 6 weeks and 18 months postpartum. METHODS: Between 16 May 2016 and 12 September 2017, 540 ART-naïve pregnant women living with HIV at urban and rural health facilities in Uganda were enrolled in the study at any gestational age. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the unblinded FLC intervention or SOC at enrolment and assessed for adherence to the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) clinic appointments at 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months postpartum, self-reported adherence to ART at 6 weeks, 6 and 24 months postpartum and supported by plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) measured at the same time points, retention in care through the end of study, and HIV status and HIV-free survival of infants at 18 months postpartum. The FLC groups were formed during pregnancy within 4 months of enrollment and held monthly meetings in their communites, and were followed up until the last group participant reached 24 months post delivery. We used Log-rank and Chi-Square p-values to test the equality of Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and hazard rates (HR) for failure to retain in care for any reason by study arm. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in adherence to PMTCT clinic visits or to ART or in median viral loads between FLC and SOC arms at any follow-up time points. Retention in care through the end of study was high in both arms but significantly higher among participants randomized to FLC (86.7%) compared to SOC (79.3%), p = 0.022. The adjusted HR of visit dropout was 2.4 times greater among participants randomized to SOC compared to FLC (aHR = 2.363, 95% CI: 1.199-4.656, p = 0.013). Median VL remained < 400 copies/ml in both arms at 6 weeks, 6, and 24 months postpartum. Eight of the 431 infants tested at 18 months were HIV positive (1.9%), however, this was not statistically different among mothers enrolled in the FLC arm compared to those in the SOC arm. At 18 months, HIV-free survival of children born to mothers in the FLC arm was significantly higher than that of children born to mothers in the SOC arm. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that programmatic interventions that provide group support, community-based ART distribution, and income-generation activities may contribute to retention in PMTCT care, HIV-free survival of children born to women living with HIV, and ultimately, to the elimination of mother-to-child HIV transmission (EMTCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02515370 (04/08/2015) on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Retention in Care , Infant , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , HIV , Mothers , Uganda , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Peer GroupABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the STREAM (Simplifying HIV TREAtment and Monitoring) study to determine risk factors associated with HIV viraemia and poor retention 18 months after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: The STREAM study was an open-label randomized controlled trial in Durban, South Africa, that enrolled 390 people living with HIV presenting for their first HIV viral load measurement ~6 months after ART initiation. We used modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors to describe associations between baseline characteristics and three HIV outcomes 18 months after ART initiation: HIV viraemia (>50 copies/mL), poor retention in HIV care, and a composite outcome of poor retention in care and/or HIV viraemia. RESULTS: Approximately 18 months after ART initiation, 45 (11.5%) participants were no longer retained in care and 43 (11.8%) had viraemia. People with CD4 counts <200 and those with viraemia 6 months after ART initiation were significantly more likely to have viraemia 18 months after ART initiation (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-7.5 and aRR 5.5; 95% CI 3.3-9.0, respectively). People who did not disclose their HIV status and had viraemia after ART initiation were more likely to not be retained in care 12 months later (aRR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1-6.1 and aRR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0-4.8). People with a CD4 count <200 and those with viraemia were more likely to not achieve the composite outcome 18 months after ART initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Viraemia after ART initiation was the strongest predictor of subsequent viraemia and poor care retention. Understanding early indicators can help target our interventions to better engage people who may be more likely to experience persistent viraemia or disengage from HIV care.