[Update on systemic sclerosis]. / Update zur systemischen Sklerose.

BACKGROUND: The updates to the European recommendations and the German guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis are expected shortly, which are very good evidence-based guidelines for all those treating the disease; however, there are still disease manifestations with insufficient studies and current study results that were published after the review of the literature for the guidelines and might be of interest to the reader. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The aim of this work is to provide an overview of the publications in the last year that are interesting from the authors' point of view. The aim is to provide practically relevant information on the current state of knowledge that can supplement the guidelines. RESULTS: The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is becoming better understood in its interplay between environmental factors and the development of autoantibodies. There have also been overviews of the manifestation and prognosis of cardiac involvement in the last year. The American Thoracic Society issued the first guidelines for the treatment of interstitial lung disease in SSc. There are an increasing number of studies that suggest that disease-modulating combination therapies, such as rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are beneficial. Work addressing the involvement of joints suggests that inflammatory changes are common. Current options for the treatment of gastrointestinal involvement are presented. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis and treatment of systemic sclerosis is making progress and many symptoms and complications are treatable. Nevertheless, much remains to be done to improve the quality of life of the patients.

Damage in a large systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with emphasis on the cardiovascular system: a longitudinal analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess organ damage, with emphasis on the cardiovascular system, over the different stages of the disease in a large SLE cohort. METHODS: Multicentre, longitudinal study of a cohort of 4219 patients with SLE enrolled in the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry. Organ damage was ascertained using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We longitudinally analysed SDI (globally and for each domain) over time only in the 1274 patients whose dates of damage events had been recorded. RESULTS: During the first year after diagnosis of SLE, 20% of the 1274 patients presented with new damage manifestations. At years 2 and 3, new damage was recorded in 11% and 9% of patients. The annual percentage of patients with new damage after year 5 decreased to 5%. In the first year with the disease, most damage was accumulated in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric and renal systems; in later stages, most damage was in the musculoskeletal, ocular and cardiovascular systems. Considering 'cerebrovascular accident' and 'claudication for 6 months' as cardiovascular items, the cardiovascular system was the second most affected system during the early stages of SLE, with 19% of the patients who presented with damage affected at first year after diagnosis. During the late stages, 20-25% of the patients presenting with new damage did so in this modified cardiovascular domain of the SDI. CONCLUSIONS: New damage occurs mainly during the first year following diagnosis of SLE. Cardiovascular damage is relevant in both the early and the late stages of the disease. Strategies to prevent cardiovascular damage should be implemented early after diagnosis of SLE.

Blockades in the Pathway of Specialty Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Report Based on Indian Rheumatology Association Database.

AIM: The study aims to identify factors influencing referral patterns and delays in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients across clinical settings in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational study collected data from eight centers using the Indian Rheumatology Association (IRA) database. Patient-related factors and referral factors were determined based on patient narration. The modified PRASAD scale categorized patients' socioeconomic status. RESULTS: The study included 4,643 RA patients from eight centers. Data from 35 patients were excluded due to inconsistent reporting of diagnosis and delay. Lack of awareness was the predominant factor causing the delay in referral. Approximately, 39% of patients were referred to the rheumatology specialty within 6 months of disease onset, while 26% reported later, and 34% reported over 2 years. Referral delays were linked to socioeconomic factors in Madhya Pradesh (21.43%) and West Bengal (28.57%). Lack of awareness about the disease and rheumatology specialty was highest in West Bengal (100%), followed by Delhi and Rajasthan (93.70%). Misconceptions about modern medicine, reluctance to refer patients to the rheumatologist, and previous treatment by other specialities were other factors influencing referral delay. Primary care clinicians' unawareness of the rheumatology specialty was the primary reason for referral delay in Gujarat (33.56%) and Delhi and Rajasthan (25.18%). CONCLUSION: Both patient and healthcare professional-related factors contribute to referral delays in RA patients. Major factors causing referral delays include reluctance to refer and inadequate knowledge about rheumatology among primary care physicians and the general public. Patients' education and occupation also influence the timing of referrals to specialty care.

Application of the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria for Takayasu arteritis to previously diagnosed patients based on the 1990 ACR criteria.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, a joint group of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) proposed new criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria). This study applied the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria to patients with previously diagnosed TAK based on the 1990 ACR criteria and investigated the concordance rate between the two criteria according to the four imaging modalities. METHODS: This study reviewed the medical records of 179 patients who met the 1990 ACR criteria for TAK. The imaging modalities included conventional angiography, computed tomography angiography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: Regardless of the imaging modalities, the concordance rate between the two criteria was 85.5% when including all patients, whereas it increased to 98.1% when only patients aged ≤60 years were included. Among the four imaging modalities, computed tomography angiography exhibited the highest concordance rate between the two criteria (85.6%). The concordance rate among patients aged >60 years was 95.7%. Only one patient aged 50-60 years was reclassified as having both TAK and giant cell arteritis. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance rate was 85.5% regardless of the imaging modalities and increased to 86.9% on simultaneous computed tomography angiography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging.

[Rheumatological care in Germany : Memorandum of the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology 2024]. / Rheumatologische Versorgung in Deutschland : Memorandum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie 2024.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatology in Germany is facing major challenges. The need for rheumatological care is increasing and can no longer be met in some regions for capacity reasons. Too many people with an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) have to forego appropriate care or receive it too late. The 4th new edition of the memorandum of the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (DGRh) provides information on rheumatological care in Germany. It was produced under the leadership of the DGRh together with the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh), the Association of Acute Rheumatology Clinics (VRA), the German Rheumatism League (DRL) and the German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ). METHODS: The memorandum describes the current state and development of the following areas: number of people with IRD, outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative care structures, number of specialists in rheumatology, education and training, quality of care, health economic aspects and digital care concepts. Proposals for health policy measures to safeguard rheumatological care are presented. RESULTS: Prevalence: approximately 1.8 million adults in Germany have an IRD. The prevalence is increasing, due to changes in the demographic structure of the population, improved diagnostics, treatment and longer survival. Care structures: outpatient specialist care (ASV) for rheumatic diseases is developing as a cross-sectoral care model for hospital outpatient clinics and rheumatology practices. Hospitals have been able to be certified as rheumatology centers since 2020, which enables structural developments. Specialists in rheumatology: as of 31 December 2023, there were 1164 specialists in rheumatology working in Germany. This included 715 physicians accredited to work in practices for national health assurance patients, 39% of whom were employees. In hospitals, 39% of doctors worked part-time. At least 2 rheumatology specialists per 100,000 adults are needed, i.e. around 1400, in order to provide adequate care. This means that there is a shortage of around 700 rheumatology specialists in the outpatient sector alone. Of all working specialists, 30% are currently aged 60 years old and over. Medical training: only 10 out of 38 (26%) state universities have an independent chair in rheumatology. In addition, 11 rheumatology departments are subordinate to a nonrheumatology chair. In the rheumatology-integration into student training (RISA) III study, only 16 out of 36 faculties fulfilled the recommended minimum number of compulsory hours of student rheumatology teaching. Continuing education in rheumatology: the annual postgraduate training qualifications do not cover the demand for rheumatology specialists, which is additionally increasing due to intensified workload, reduced capacities through retirement, and part-time work. Quality of care: since the introduction of highly effective medication patients with IRD have a much better chance of achieving remission of their disease. With early initiation of targeted therapy, the lives of many patients are hardly restricted at all: however, waiting times for a first rheumatological visit often last more than 3 months. Quality target is a first consultation within the first 6 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Models for early consultation, delegation of medical services, structured patient training and digital care concepts have been positively evaluated but are not covered financially. COSTS: the total annual costs for inflammatory joint diseases alone amount to around 3 billion euros. The direct costs have significantly risen since the introduction of biologics, while the indirect costs for sick leave, disability and hospitalization have fallen. CONCLUSION: The core demands of this memorandum are a significant and sustainable increase in the number of further training positions in the outpatient and inpatient sector, the creation of chairs or at least independent departments for rheumatology at all universities and the further implementation of new and cross-sectoral forms of care. This will ensure modern needs-based rheumatological care for all patients in the future.

Principles of clinical genetics for rheumatologists: clinical indications and interpretation of broad-based genetic testing.

Advances in DNA sequencing technologies, especially next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is the basis for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), have profoundly transformed immune-mediated rheumatic disease diagnosis. Recently, substantial cost reductions have facilitated access to these diagnostic tools, expanded the capacity of molecular diagnostics and enabled the pursuit of precision medicine in rheumatology. Understanding the fundamental principles of genetics and diversity in genetic variant classification is a crucial milestone in rheumatology. However, despite the growing availability of DNA sequencing platforms, a significant number of autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), neuromuscular disorders, hereditary collagen diseases, and monogenic bone diseases remain unsolved, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) pose a formidable challenge to addressing these unmet needs in the coming decades. This article aims to provide an overview of the clinical indications and interpretation of comprehensive genetic testing in the medical field, addressing the related complexities and implications.

Time to start disease modifying drugs for adults with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: results of the first year of the national New Zealand Rheumatology Association (NZRA) audit.

AIM: This audit describes variation in the time from referral to starting disease modifying drug (DMARD) for people with newly diagnosed seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), how frequently this was within the recommended 6 weeks and whether regional, service-level or patient-level factors were associated with this variation. METHOD: Rheumatologists submitted data on new patients with a new diagnosis of rheumatoid factor and/or cyclic-citrullinated peptide antibody positive RA. The association between visit funding, ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation, rurality, local specialist staffing levels and the time to DMARD treatment was assessed using Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS: Data were collected on 355 patients over 12 months. Overall, 64.8% of patients commenced DMARD treatment within 6 weeks of referral and this was associated with rheumatologist FTE per 100,000 population (adjusted HR 2.47, 95%CI 1.27-4.81; p=0.008) and the rurality (Geographic Classification of Health [GCH]) of the patient (for R2 compared to U1 adjusted HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.09-0.43; p<0.001). There was no association between time to DMARD and ethnicity or socio-economic deprivation. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in time to DMARD treatment, mainly related to variation in rheumatologist staffing levels and patient rurality. Rheumatologist staffing levels of 1.0 FTE/100,000 population was associated with 80% of patients meeting the recommended 6-week time to DMARD treatment.

Referrals for rheumatologic evaluation following a positive antinuclear antibody test result. A cross-sectional single center Brazilian study.

BACKGROUND: In general, patients are referred for rheumatological evaluation due to isolated laboratory abnormalities, especially antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity, with the risk of more severe patients remaining on the waiting list for longer than desired. The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic, clinical, and laboratory information of patients referred to a specialized rheumatological care unit because of positive antinuclear antibody. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 99 out of 1670 patients seen by the same rheumatologist between 01/01/2011 and 01/01/2019. Patients whose referrals were exclusively due to the ANA test result and the specialist's final diagnosis being "abnormal finding of serum immunological test" (ICD-10 R769) were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory information were extracted from the consulting rheumatologist's chart. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, most of whom were female (84.8%) with a median age of 49 years. At the moment of specialist's appointment, 97 patients (97.9%) repeated the ANA test, and 77 patients remained positive. Of these, only 35 (35.35%) were in a high titer range (greater than or equal to 1:320). Complete blood count for cytopenia's investigation was not performed in a high percentage of patients (22.2%), as well as urinalysis (31.3%). In addition, more than 70% of patients score 0 to 1 classification criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, according to SLE - ACR 1987 (American College of Rheumatology) and SLICC 2012 (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients are still referred for specialized evaluation due to the misinterpretation of laboratory tests that were inappropriately requested in patients without clinical evidence of autoimmune rheumatic disease.

Clinical relevance of positively determined myositis antibodies in rheumatology: a retrospective monocentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: The increased availability of myositis autoantibodies represents new possibilities and challenges in clinical practice (Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, de Visser M, et al. 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1955-64. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468 .). The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective data analysis of patient cases with positive myositis autoantibodies to analyse their significance in routine rheumatology practice. METHODS: A monocentric analysis of all the orders used to determine myositis autoantibodies from July 2019 to May 2022 in the Department of Rheumatology, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Cologne, Germany, was carried out. RESULTS: In the defined time interval, a total of 71,597 laboratory values for the antibodies mentioned above were obtained. A total of 238 different positive autoantibodies ​​were detected in 209 patients. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy was diagnosed in 37 patients (18%), and inflammatory rheumatic diseases other than idiopathic inflammatory myopathy were diagnosed in 90 patients (43%). No inflammatory rheumatic disease was diagnosed in 82 patients (39%). General clusters of clinical manifestations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, we were able to show that a relevant proportion of patients with positive myositis antibodies did not have idiopathic inflammatory myopathies or inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This finding indicates the importance of myositis autoantibodies in this group of patients. However, further studies on the course of symptoms and examination results in patients without inflammatory rheumatic diseases and with positive myositis antibodies are necessary.

Bridging the gap: facilitating the use of rheumatology research results in clinical practice with hybrid implementation effectiveness studies.

The implementation of proven effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions into routine rheumatology practice is a lengthy and complex process. Bridging this gap between research and practice is crucial. Hybrid implementation effectiveness studies, integrating effectiveness and implementation aspects, emerge as a proactive and innovative solution to shorten the process of translation of proven interventions into clinical practice. This viewpoint provides an overview of the various types of hybrid implementation effectiveness studies including examples from rheumatology research practice, explains their pivotal role in speeding up the implementation of rheumatology research results and concludes with practical recommendations for the conduct of hybrid implementation effectiveness studies.

Analysis of the image and corporate identity of the Colegio Mexicano de Reumatologia: Is it time to redefine it?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología (CMR) is a corporation whose brand has two elements-image and identity-that differentiate it from other corporations. We evaluated aspects of CMR's corporate image and identity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To assess corporate image, we designed a survey using proof-of-concept and discrete-choice-experiments approaches. It assessed which definition (orthopedist, rheumatologist, or rehabilitator) was most meaningful in four pain scenarios in healthy adults from the country's Western region. We used discourse analysis and five readability indices of the CMR website to assess corporate identity. RESULTS: In total, 700 respondents were included. For every rheumatologist chosen in the hand scenario, respondents chose 1.13 orthopedists and 0.70 rehabilitators. For every rheumatologist chosen in the knee scenario, respondents chose 2.36 orthopedists and 0.64 rehabilitators, whereas 0.85 orthopedists and 0.58 rehabilitators were chosen in the arthritis scenario. Only 38% of the respondents preferred the CMR's definition of a rheumatologist to describe a rheumatologist. The younger age group preferred orthopedists to rheumatologists (50% vs. 31%, p<0.001). In the arthritis scenario, the choice of rheumatologist increased from 27% in the elementary school group to 49% in the university group (p<0.001). Mother was the most influential in healthcare seeking. The discursive analysis revealed that the CMR is positioned as a "we" restricted to "colleagues;" the patient did not have agentive representation. The semiotic structure of the CMR's mission/vision was deemed imprecise and lacking in statements of value and purpose; the readability scores indicated that the text was challenging and dry. CONCLUSIONS: The CMR's corporate image does not differentiate it from other health providers. CMR's identity seems ambiguous with restricted directionality. It seems pertinent to redefine the CMR.

Recommendations on cutaneous and hematological manifestations of Sjögren's disease by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology.

Sjogren's disease (SjD) is an autoimmune disease that is characterized not only by the sicca symptoms it causes but also by its systemic nature, which is capable of several and not yet fully understood extraglandular manifestations. To gain a clearer understanding of these manifestations as well as a better practical approach, a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the identification of epidemiologic and clinical features of the extraglandular manifestations present in ESSDAI (EULAR Sjogren´s syndrome disease activity index), followed by a voting panel with recommendations for clinical practice. This publication is complementary to others already published and covers cutaneous and hematological manifestations, with prevalence data generated by a meta-analysis of 13 clinical or laboratory manifestations and 6 clinical management recommendations.

2023 Brazilian Society of Rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations. In the last decade, several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate new treatment options for SSc. The purpose of this work is to update the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in light of the new evidence available for the pharmacological management of SSc. METHODS: A systematic review including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for predefined questions that were elaborated according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy was conducted. The rating of the available evidence was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. To become a recommendation, at least 75% agreement of the voting panel was needed. RESULTS: Six recommendations were elaborated regarding the pharmacological treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon, the treatment (healing) and prevention of digital ulcers, skin involvement, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and gastrointestinal involvement in SSc patients based on results available from RCTs. New drugs, such as rituximab, were included as therapeutic options for skin involvement, and rituximab, tocilizumab and nintedanib were included as therapeutic options for ILD. Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of scleroderma renal crisis and musculoskeletal involvement were elaborated based on the expert opinion of the voting panel, as no placebo-controlled RCTs were found. CONCLUSION: These guidelines updated and incorporated new treatment options for the management of SSc based on evidence from the literature and expert opinion regarding SSc, providing support for decision-making in clinical practice.

Updates in Ultrasound in Rheumatology.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the authors' narrative review was to outline the current literature regarding the use of ultrasound in main rheumatic disorders and summarize the updates, specifically about rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and crystal-induced arthropathies. METHODS: The authors searched on PubMed for articles discussing the major updates regarding the role of ultrasound in the previously mentioned rheumatic conditions. RESULTS: The authors have provided the updated definitions, new criteria, and diagnostic scores. CONCLUSIONS: In rheumatology's dynamic landscape, this review provides valuable insights for researchers and clinicians on ultrasound's role in improving patient care and outcomes in rheumatic diseases.

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rheumatology.

This review focuses on the most frequent whole-body MRI applications in patients with rheumatological pathologies, for which this tool can be helpful to both radiologists and clinicians. It reports technical aspects of the acquisition of both 1.5 and 3.0 T scanners. The article lists the main findings that help radiologists during the evaluation of a specific pathology, both in the diagnostic phase and during follow-up.