The learning curve of laparoscopic single-site salpingectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments: A retrospective cohort study.

Tubal pregnancy is a common cause of maternal mortality in early pregnancy. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) has gained popularity due to its safety and aesthetic advantages. However, the lack of affordable disposable entry platforms hinders its widespread adoption. This study aimed to investigate the learning curve of tubal pregnancy removal using single-incision multiport (SIMP) laparoscopy and provide guidance for novice gynecologists. A retrospective analysis was conducted on cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) diagnosed at Dongguan Songshan Lake Central Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022. The analysis included 50 cases, with 25 undergoing single-port laparoscopy and 25 undergoing conventional laparoscopy (CL). Various indicators, including body mass index (BMI), previous pregnancies, mass size, hemoglobin levels, surgical duration, and complications, were collected. Learning curve analysis using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique was performed to assess procedural proficiency. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or complications between the 2 groups. However, the single-port laparoscopy group exhibited a statistically significant longer average surgical time (41.60 ±â€…13.38 minutes) compared to the conventional laparotomy group (32.96 ±â€…7.32 minutes). The CUSUM analysis demonstrated a decline in surgical time after the completion of approximately 11 cases, indicating an improvement in SIMP laparoscopy surgical proficiency. SIMP laparoscopy for tubal pregnancy removal achieved similar safety outcomes as CL. Notably, the CUSUM analysis revealed that proficiency in single-port laparoscopy could be achieved after approximately 11 cases, leading to stable surgical times. These findings serve as valuable guidance for novice gynecologists interested in adopting single-incision laparoscopy.

Mental practice for laparoscopic salpingectomy.

Mental practice (MP) is a method of enhancing surgical training by rehearsal of a task without physical action. The primary objective of the study was to develop and validate a MP tool for laparoscopic salpingectomy (LS). An imagery script for LS was developed and used to facilitate a structured MP session for trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and expert gynaecologists across three teaching hospitals in the UK. A virtual platform was used for one trainee group to assess its feasibility compared to a face-to-face approach. Pre- and post-session assessments were conducted to evaluate the impact of the script on motivation, confidence, preparedness and quality of imagery and demonstrated a significant improvement in global imagery scores for both novice groups. The expert group scored significantly higher than the face-to-face novice group on all items both before and after MP, indicating construct validity. There were no significant differences demonstrated between the two novice groups, thus demonstrating the virtual platform to be a non-inferior approach - an important consideration in the current COVID era.

Virtual reality simulation to enhance laparoscopic salpingectomy skills.

BACKGROUND: To assess skill enhancement and maintenance by virtual-reality simulation of laparoscopic salpingectomy in gynecologic surgery fellows. Skill acquisition by virtual-reality surgical simulation is an active field of research and technological development. Salpingectomy is one of the first gynecologic surgery techniques taught to fellows that requires accompanied learning. METHODS: A single-center prospective study was performed in the University of Lyon, France, including 26 junior fellows (≤ 3 semesters' internship) performing laparoscopic salpingectomy exercises on a LapSim® virtual reality simulator. Salpingectomy was performed and timed on 3 trials in session 1 and 3 trials in session 2, at a 3-month interval. Analysis was based on students' subjective assessments and a senior surgeon's objective assessment of skill. Progress between the 2 sessions was assessed on McNemar test and Wilcoxon test for matched series. RESULTS: 26 junior specialist trainees performed all trials. Most performed anterograde salpingectomy, both in session 1 (69 %) and session 2 (86 %). Mean procedure time was significantly shorter in session 2: 6.10min versus 7.82min (p=0.0003). There was a significant decrease in blood loss between the first trial in session 1 and the last trial in session 2: 167ml versus 70.3ml (p=0.02). Subjective assessment showed a significant decrease in anxiety and significant increase in perceived efficacy, eye-hand coordination and ergonomics. Efficacy, performance quality and speed of execution as assessed by the senior surgeon all improved significantly from trial to trial, while hesitation significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that junior trainees improved their surgical skills on a short laparoscopic exercise using a virtual reality simulator. Virtual reality simulation is useful in the early learning curve, accelerating the acquisition of reflexes. Maintaining skill requires simulation sessions at shorter intervals.

Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulators combined with head-mounted displays enable highly immersive virtual reality (VR) for surgical skills training, potentially bridging the gap between the simulation environment and real-life operating room conditions. However, the increased complexity of the learning situation in immersive VR could potentially induce high cognitive load thereby inhibiting performance and learning. This study aims to compare cognitive load and performance in immersive VR and conventional VR simulation training. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of residents (n = 31) performing laparoscopic salpingectomies with an ectopic pregnancy in either immersive VR or conventional VR simulation. Cognitive load was estimated by secondary-task reaction time at baseline, and during nonstressor and stressor phases of the procedure. Simulator metrics were used to evaluate performance. RESULTS: Cognitive load was increased by 66% and 58% during immersive VR and conventional VR simulation, respectively (p < 0.001), compared to baseline. A light stressor induced a further increase in cognitive load by 15.2% and a severe stressor by 43.1% in the immersive VR group compared to 23% (severe stressor) in the conventional VR group. Immersive VR also caused a significantly worse performance on most simulator metrics. CONCLUSION: Immersive VR simulation training induces a higher cognitive load and results in a poorer performance than conventional VR simulation training in laparoscopy. High extraneous load and element interactivity in the immersive VR are suggested as mechanisms explaining this finding. However, immersive VR offers some potential advantages over conventional VR such as more real-life conditions but we only recommend introducing immersive VR in surgical skills training after initial training in conventional VR.

Effect of structural training on surgical outcomes of residents' first operative laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gynecological surgery and resident education have changed during recent decades, thus impacting surgical training. Training on simulators must begin before operating on patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simple curriculum on the surgical outcome of the participants' first operative laparoscopy. METHODS: This randomized prospective interventional study was carried out in Helsinki University Hospital and Hyvinkää Hospital. We recruited twenty junior residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology, of which half formed a control group and the rest completed the intervention with a theoretical and a practical part. The participants' first laparoscopic salpingectomy was assessed from video recordings by using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) forms and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The surgical outcome and assessed scores were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We found no differences in operative time, blood loss, or complications, nor in OSATS or NRS scores. In the intervention group, participants with the weakest performances in the simulator, seemed to benefit from the training program more than the participants with the best performances (skill level elevation 29.2-31.6% vs. 21.1-23.3%, respectively). The participants with the best performances in the simulator were scored among the best in the recorded operations as well. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found no difference in the surgical outcome between the groups. However, the participants with low starting levels in the simulator could elevate their skill levels more, though they did not reach the skill level of those with a high starting level. Consequently, we found elevation in skills levels in the simulator tasks, but not in the surgical outcome. Likely, our simple training program with a fixed number of repetitions was insufficient to reach a plateau in the learning curve, and thus the training program in such a curriculum should be proficiency based.

Preoperative Practice Paired With Instructor Feedback May Not Improve Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Operative Performance.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that preoperative practice prior to surgery can improve trainee performance, but the optimal approach has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if preoperative practice by surgical trainees paired with instructor feedback improved surgical technique, compared to preoperative practice or feedback alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of obstetrics-gynecology trainees, stratified on a simulator-assessed surgical skill. Participants were randomized to preoperative practice on a simulator with instructor feedback (PPF), preoperative practice alone (PP), or feedback alone (F). Trainees then completed a laparoscopic salpingectomy, and the operative performance was evaluated using an assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 18 residents were randomized and completed the study, 6 in each arm. The mean baseline score on the simulator was comparable in each group (67% for PPF, 68% for PP, and 70% for F). While the median score on the assessment tool for laparoscopic salpingectomy in the PPF group was the highest, there was no statistically significant difference in assessment scores for the PPF group (32.75; range, 15-36) compared to the PP group (14.5; range, 10-34) and the F group (21.25; range, 10.5-32). The interrater correlation between the video reviewers was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.95) using the intraclass correlation coefficient. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a surgical preoperative practice with instructor feedback may not improve operative technique compared to either preoperative practice or feedback alone.

Randomized trial to examine procedure-to-procedure transfer in laparoscopic simulator training.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic simulation has become a standard component of surgical training, but there is limited knowledge regarding skills transfer between procedural tasks. The objective was to investigate the specificity of procedural simulator training. METHODS: This was randomized single-centre educational superiority trial. Surgical novices practised basic skills on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. On reaching proficiency, participants were randomized to proficiency-based training. The intervention group practised two procedures on the simulator (appendicectomy followed by salpingectomy), whereas the control group trained on only one procedure (salpingectomy). The main outcomes were number of repetitions and time to proficiency for the second procedure. RESULTS: Ninety-six participants were randomized, of whom 74 per cent were women, with a median age of 26 years. The intervention group needed significantly fewer attempts than the control group to reach proficiency in the second procedure: median (i.q.r.) 22 (17-34) versus 32 (26-41) attempts, which corresponded to 24·1 per cent fewer attempts as assessed by multivariable analysis (P = 0·004). The intervention group required significantly less time than the control group to reach proficiency: median (i.q.r.) 88 (63-127) versus 131 (101-153) min respectively, corresponding to a difference of 31·1 min as assessed by multivariable analysis (P = 0·001). CONCLUSION: Practising two procedures, compared with only one, reduced the number of attempts and time to reach proficiency in the second procedure. Skills transfer is seen between two tasks in laparoscopic simulator training; however, task specificity is still present when practising procedures. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02069951 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Traditional Versus Simulation Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the porcine training model for obstetrics-gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in laparoscopic salpingectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled single-blinded trial. CLASSIFICATION: Canadian Task Force Classification I. SETTING: A large community-based teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All postgraduate year 1 through year 4 OB/GYN residents were enrolled (n = 22). INTERVENTION: All participants underwent a preintervention objective skills assessment test (OSAT), in which the participant performed live human laparoscopic salpingectomy. Residents were randomly assigned (using a computer-generated randomization table, in blocks of 2, stratified by ranked baseline OSAT scores) to the intervention or control group. The intervention group consisted of 1 educational session with presession assigned reading, a 40-min didactic lecture, viewing of a procedural video, and simulation and practice of laparoscopic salpingectomy on a porcine cadaver. The control group received traditional training per routine residency rotations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Laparoscopic salpingectomy was performed on live patients by study participants pre- and postintervention. These procedures were video recorded, and then scored by a single blinded evaluator of the OSATs. Nine pre- and postintervention OSAT indicators, reflecting provider knowledge and skill, were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes were the changes in 10 subjective measures of comfort, assessed by a pre- and postintervention survey. The outcomes were assessed using 5-point Likert scales (for OSATs 1 = lowest score; for the subjective survey 1 = highest score). The control group OSAT scores did not change (pre: 26.6 ± 10.8, post: 26.2 ± 10.1; p = .65). There were significant improvements in 2-handed surgery (pre: 2.8 ± 1.6, post: 3.5 ± 1.3; p = .004) and use of energy (pre: 2.9 ± 1.3, post: 3.6 ± 1.0; p = .01) in the intervention group, contributing to an overall score change (pre: 26.7 ± 10.6, post: 29.9 ± 9.8; p ≤ .001). The control group had no change in comfort levels. The intervention group experienced both increases (anatomy, steps of surgery, 2-handed surgery, and use of energy) and decreases (reading and learning in operating room) in reported comfort levels. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that simulation can improve surgical technique OSATs. However, of 45 possible points, both groups' average scores were <70% of the optimum. Thus, the improvement, although statistically significant, was relatively small and indicates that further supplementation in training is needed to substantially increase the residents' surgical skills.

Introducing a laparoscopic simulation training and credentialing program in gynaecology: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Simulation training in laparoscopic surgery has been shown to improve surgical performance. AIMS: To describe the implementation of a laparoscopic simulation training and credentialing program for gynaecology registrars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot program consisting of protected, supervised laparoscopic simulation time, a tailored curriculum and a credentialing process, was developed and implemented. Quantitative measures assessing simulated surgical performance were measured over the simulation training period. Laparoscopic procedures requiring credentialing were assessed for both the frequency of a registrar being the primary operator and the duration of surgery and compared to a presimulation cohort. Qualitative measures regarding quality of surgical training were assessed pre- and postsimulation. RESULTS: Improvements were seen in simulated surgical performance in efficiency domains. Operative time for procedures requiring credentialing was reduced by 12%. Primary operator status in the operating theatre for registrars was unchanged. Registrar assessment of training quality improved. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a laparoscopic simulation training and credentialing program resulted in improvements in simulated performance, reduced operative time and improved registrar assessment of the quality of training.

Effect of instructor feedback on skills retention after laparoscopic simulator training: follow-up of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Instructor feedback reduces the number of repetitions and time to reach proficiency during laparoscopic simulator training. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of instructor feedback on long-term skill retention. METHODS: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized trial. Participants were surgical novices (medical students). All participants (n = 99) initially practiced a laparoscopic salpingectomy on the LapSim virtual reality simulator to proficiency. The intervention group could request instructor feedback, whereas the control group could not. After 6 months, the participants (n = 65) practiced on the simulator until they reached proficiency again. The primary outcomes were the total time and the number of repetitions. RESULTS: Initially, the intervention group used significantly fewer repetitions (29 vs 65, p < 0.0005) and less total training time (162 vs 342 min, p < 0.0005) than the control group to reach the proficiency level. At follow-up, both the groups used an equal number of repetitions (21 vs 20, p = 0.72) and time (83 vs 73 min, p = 0.37) to reach the same proficiency level. CONCLUSIONS: Instructor feedback during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training does not affect the long-term retention of skills.

Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of structured curricula for minimally invasive surgery training is becoming increasingly popular. However, many laparoscopic training programs still use basic skills and isolated task training, despite increasing evidence to support the use of training models with higher functional resemblance, such as whole procedural modules. In contrast to basic skills training, procedural training involves several cognitive skills such as elements of planning, movement integration, and how to avoid adverse events. The objective of this trial is to investigate the specificity of procedural practice in laparoscopic simulator training. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised single-centre educational superiority trial. Participants are 96 surgical novices (medical students) without prior laparoscopic experience. Participants start by practicing a series of basic skills tasks to a predefined proficiency level on a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. Upon reaching proficiency, the participants are randomised to either the intervention group, which practices two procedures (an appendectomy followed by a salpingectomy) or to the control group, practicing only one procedure (a salpingectomy) on the simulator. 1:1 central randomisation is used and participants are stratified by sex and time to complete the basic skills. Data collection is done at a surgical skills centre.The primary outcome is the number of repetitions required to reach a predefined proficiency level on the salpingectomy module. The secondary outcome is the total training time to proficiency. The improvement in motor skills and effect on cognitive load are also explored. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial might provide new knowledge on how the technical part of surgical training curricula should be comprised in the future. To examine the specificity of practice in procedural simulator training is of great importance in order to develop more comprehensive surgical curricula. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02069951.

Influence of surgeon behavior on trainee willingness to speak up: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine if a surgeon's behaviors can encourage or discourage trainees from speaking up when they witness a surgical mistake. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial in which medical students (n = 55) were randomly assigned to an "encouraged" (n = 28) or "discouraged" (n = 27) group. Participants underwent personality tests to assess decision-making styles, and were then trained on basic tasks ("burn" then "cut") on a laparoscopic surgery simulator. After randomization, students assisted at a simulated laparoscopic salpingectomy. The senior surgeon used either an "encourage" script (eg, "Your opinion is important.") or a "discourage" script (eg, "Do what I say. Save questions for next time."). Otherwise, the surgery was conducted identically. Subsequently, a surgical mistake was made by the senior surgeon when he instructed students to cut without burning. Students were considered to have spoken up if they questioned the instruction and did not cut. Potential personality bias was assessed with two validated personality tests before simulation. Data were processed with Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The students in the encouraged group were significantly more likely to speak up (23 of 28 [82%] vs 8 of 27 [30%]; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in personality traits, student training level (p = 1.0), or sex (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: A discouraging environment decreases the frequency with which trainees speak up when witnessing a surgical error. The senior surgeon plays an important role in improving intraoperative communication between junior and senior clinicians and can enhance patient safety.

A structured four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy: development and validation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy consisting of validated modules integrating a cognitive component, a practical component and a procedural component. DESIGN: A four-step curriculum was developed. The methodology was different for each step. Step 1: A 1-day course in basic laparoscopy developed on the background of a regional needs analysis. Step 2: A multiple-choice test, developed and validated through interviews with experts in laparoscopy and subsequently through a Delphi audit involving regional chief physicians. Step 3: A procedural training task (a salpingectomy) on a validated virtual reality simulator. Step 4: An operation on a patient (a salpingectomy) with following formative assessment based on a validated assessment scale. SETTING: University hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. POPULATION: Fifty-two first-year residents in obstetrics and gynecology from 2009 to 2011. METHOD: Observational cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Completion rate. RESULTS: All participants completed step 1 and improved post-course test scores compared with pre-course test scores, p = 0.001. Step 2 was completed by 75% (37/52); all improved test scores after 6 months, p = 0.001. Step 3 was completed by 75%. Participants used 238 min (range 75-599) and 38 repetitions (range 8-99) to reach proficiency level on a virtual reality simulator. Step 4 was completed by 55%. There was no correlation between test scores and simulator training time. Protected training time was correlated with increasing completion rate. CONCLUSION: A four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy is applicable in residency training. Protected training time correlated with increasing completion rate.

Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate whether training on previously validated laparoscopic skill stations translates into improved technical performance in the operating room. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the performance of a laparoscopic bilateral midsegment salpingectomy. Residents were randomized to either traditional teaching (no simulation) or faculty-directed sessions in a simulation laboratory. A sample size of at least 44 lower-level residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1 or 2) and 66 upper-level (PGY 3 or 4) were necessary to demonstrate a 50% improvement in performance assuming an α error of 0.05 and ß error of 0.20 for each group independently. The primary outcomes were the final total normalized simulation score and the operating room performance score. Paired t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate the differences within and between cohorts. Our final model involved a multiple linear regression analysis for the main effects of a priori--specified variables. RESULTS: We enrolled 116 residents from eight centers across the United States. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline simulation or operative performances. Although both groups demonstrated improvement with time, the trained group improved significantly higher normalized simulation scores (378 ± 54 compared with 264 ± 86; P<.01) and higher levels of competence on the simulated tasks (96.2% compared with 61.1%; P<.01). The simulation group also had higher objective structured assessment of technical skills scores in the operating room (27.5 compared with 30.0; P=.03). CONCLUSION: We found that proficiency-based simulation offers additional benefit to traditional education for all levels of residents. The use of easily accessible, low-fidelity tasks should be incorporated into formal laparoscopic training.

Psychomotor skills and cognitive load training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for tubal surgery is effective.

OBJECTIVES: Validation of a virtual reality (VR) simulator for the training and assessment of laparoscopic tubal surgery and mapping of cognitive load. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted at the Imperial College Virtual Reality Surgical Skills laboratory amongst 25 trainees and nine senior gynaecologists. Participants performed two sessions of salpingectomy and salpingotomy procedures on a VR simulator to assess construct validity. Nine novices performed ten such sessions to enable assessment of the learning curve. The relationship between cognitive load and the dexterity parameters was assessed. Simulator fidelity was reported by experienced and intermediate level gynaecologists. Statistical analyses utilised non-parametric tests, Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Learning curves were assessed using the Friedman test and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Relationship between dexterity metrics and cognitive load was performed using Spearman's rank order correlation. RESULTS: Salpingectomy demonstrated construct validity for time taken by experienced, intermediate and novice gynaecologists (median 170 vs. 191 vs. 313s (P=0.003) respectively) and movements (median 200 vs. 267 vs. 376s, P=0.045). Salpingotomy demonstrated construct validity for time taken (median 183 vs. 191 vs. 306s, P=<0.001) and movements (median 210 vs. 233 vs. 328s, P=0.005). Learning curve analysis for salpingectomy displayed a plateau for time taken after the eighth session, and the fourth session for movements. Salpingotomy displayed a plateau after the eighth session for both time taken and movements. Cognitive load correlated significantly with dexterity parameters. The fidelity scores were not significantly different between the two procedures (P=0.619). CONCLUSION: The LAP Mentor VR laparoscopic simulator is a valid and effective tool for training novice surgeons in ectopic pregnancy surgery. Reduction in cognitive load significantly correlates with the learning curves.

Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback when training a complex operational task on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. BACKGROUND: : Simulators are now widely accepted as a training tool, but there is insufficient knowledge about how much feedback is necessary, which is useful for sustainable implementation. METHODS: A randomized trial complying with CONSORT Statement. All participants had to reach a predefined proficiency level for a complex operational task on a virtual reality simulator. The intervention group received standardized instructor feedback a maximum of 3 times. The control group did not receive instructor feedback. Participants were senior medical students without prior laparoscopic experience (n = 99). Outcome measures were time, repetitions, and performance score to reach a predefined proficiency level. Furthermore, influence of sex and perception of own surgical skills were examined. RESULTS: Time (in minutes) and repetitions were reduced in the intervention group (162 vs 342 minutes; P < 0.005) and (29 vs 65 repetitions; P < 0.005). The control group achieved a higher performance score than the intervention group (57% vs 49%; P = 0.004). Men used less time (in minutes) than women (P = 0.037), but no sex difference was observed for repetitions (P = 0.20). Participants in the intervention group had higher self-perception regarding surgical skills after the trial (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Instructor feedback increases the efficiency when training a complex operational task on a virtual reality simulator; time and repetitions used to achieve a predefined proficiency level were significantly reduced in the group that received instructor feedback compared with the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01497782.