Subject(s)
Neurosciences/standards , Punishment , Research Personnel/ethics , Research Personnel/standards , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Chile , Dissent and Disputes , Ethics, Research/education , Reproducibility of Results , Research Personnel/education , Research Personnel/psychology , Scientific Misconduct/ethicsSubject(s)
Community Participation , Human Experimentation/ethics , Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Scientific Misconduct/ethics , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Participation/legislation & jurisprudence , Guatemala , History, 20th Century , Human Experimentation/history , Humans , Long Term Adverse Effects/ethnology , Scientific Misconduct/history , Syphilis/ethnology , Syphilis/history , United States , United States Public Health Service/ethics , United States Public Health Service/history , United States Public Health Service/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Since 1931, and especially since the Nuremberg Code of 1947, an increasing number of declarations, regulations, norms, guidelines, laws, resolutions, and rules intended to create conditions for better protection of subjects participating in research studies have been published, although some have meant setbacks in the human rights of vulnerable populations. As such, violations of the dignity of experimental subjects in clinical trials continue. What researchers investigate and how the research is done, the quality and transparency of the data, and the analysis and the publication of results (of both raw and processed data) respond to the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies, coming into permanent tension with bioethical principles and the needs of society. The active participation of civil society is necessary to make it so that pharmaceutical research, results and applications subordinate economic benefits to the protection of human rights.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Human Experimentation/ethics , Human Rights Abuses/ethics , International Cooperation , Pharmaceutical Research/ethics , Scientific Misconduct/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Developing Countries/economics , Europe , Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights Abuses/economics , Human Rights Abuses/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , International Cooperation/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmaceutical Research/economics , Pharmaceutical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , United StatesSubject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Periodicals as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Research Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Retraction of Publication as Topic , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil , Humans , Societies, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , United StatesSubject(s)
Gonorrhea/history , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation , Penicillins/history , Scientific Misconduct , Syphilis/history , Guatemala , History, 20th Century , Humans , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/ethics , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/history , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Scientific Misconduct/ethics , Scientific Misconduct/history , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , United StatesSubject(s)
International Cooperation , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/ethics , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Scientific Misconduct/ethics , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Vulnerable Populations , Gonorrhea/history , Guatemala , History, 20th Century , Humans , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/history , Penicillins/history , Scientific Misconduct/history , Syphilis/history , United StatesABSTRACT
Plagiarism is defined as the intellectual fraud in which an individual attempts to unduly appropriate, for his/her own benefit, the knowledge, ideas or discoveries of someone else. It is not uncommon in academic settings where research is conducted and a creative work is carried out. Due to the dismal consequences of plagiarism, cautionary measures and sanctions are required to avoid it. This paper is intended to warn and promote a discussion about plagiarism. The Faculty of Medicine of the University of Chile and its ethics committee believe that a fight against these type of actions will contribute to prevent their detrimental effects on the moral and intellectual patrimony of our society.
Subject(s)
Codes of Ethics/legislation & jurisprudence , Plagiarism , Scientific Misconduct/ethics , Chile , Ethics Committees, Research , Humans , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Plagiarism is defined as the intellectual fraud in which an individual attempts to unduly appropriate, for his/her own benefit, the knowledge, ideas or discoveries of someone else. It is not uncommon in academic settings where research is conducted and a creative work is carried out. Due to the dismal consequences of plagiarism, cautionary measures and sanctions are required to avoid it. This paper is intended to warn and promote a discussion about plagiarism. The Faculty of Medicine of the University of Chile and its ethics committee believe that a fight against these type of actions will contribute to prevent their detrimental effects on the moral and intellectual patrimony of our society.