The impact of norepinephrine dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in septic shock patients.

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine (NE) is a cornerstone drug in the management of septic shock, with its dose being used clinically as a marker of disease severity and as mortality predictor. However, variations in NE dose reporting either as salt formulations or base molecule may lead to misinterpretation of mortality risks and hinder the process of care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to assess the impact of NE dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in a cohort of septic shock patients. NE doses were converted from the base molecule to equivalent salt doses, and their ability to predict 28-day mortality at common severity dose cut-offs was compared. RESULTS: 4086 eligible patients with septic shock were identified, with a median age of 68 [57-78] years, an admission SOFA score of 7 [6-10], and lactate at diagnosis of 3.2 [2.4-5.1] mmol/L. Median peak NE dose at day 1 was 0.24 [0.12-0.42] µg/kg/min, with a 28-day mortality of 39.3%. The NE dose showed significant heterogeneity in mortality prediction depending on which formulation was reported, with doses reported as bitartrate and tartrate presenting 65 (95% CI 79-43)% and 67 (95% CI 80-47)% lower ORs than base molecule, respectively. This divergence in prediction widened at increasing NE doses. When using a 1 µg/kg/min threshold, predicted mortality was 54 (95% CI 52-56)% and 83 (95% CI 80-87)% for tartrate formulation and base molecule, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous reporting of NE doses significantly affects mortality prediction in septic shock. Standardizing NE dose reporting as base molecule could enhance risk stratification and improve processes of care. These findings underscore the importance of consistent NE dose reporting practices in critical care settings.

Antimicrobial peptide 2K4L inhibits the inflammatory response in macrophages and Caenorhabditis elegans and protects against LPS-induced septic shock in mice.

2K4L is a rationally designed analog of the short α-helical peptide temporin-1CEc, a natural peptide isolated and purified from the skin secretions of the Chinese brown frog Rana chensinensis by substituting amino acid residues. 2K4L displayed improved and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity than temporin-1CEc in vitro. Here, the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of 2K4L in macrophages, C. elegans and mice were investigated. The results demonstrated that 2K4L could enter THP-1 cells to kill a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain (MRAB 0227) and a sensitive A. baumannii strain (AB 22933), as well as reduce proinflammatory responses induced by MRAB 0227 by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway. Similarly, 2K4L exhibited strong bactericidal activity against A. baumannii uptake into C. elegans, extending the lifespan and healthspan of the nematodes. Meanwhile, 2K4L alleviated the oxidative stress response by inhibiting the expression of core genes in the p38 MAPK/PMK-1 signaling pathway and downregulating the phosphorylation level of p38, thereby protecting the nematodes from damage by A. baumannii. Finally, in an LPS-induced septic model, 2K4L enhanced the survival of septic mice and decreased the production of proinflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the signaling protein expression of the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways and protecting LPS-induced septic mice from a lethal inflammatory response. In conclusion, 2K4L ameliorated LPS-induced inflammation both in vitro and in vivo.

Methylene Blue in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Although clinicians may use methylene blue (MB) in refractory septic shock, the effect of MB on patient-important outcomes remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of MB administration in patients with septic shock. DATA SOURCES: We searched six databases (including PubMed, Embase, and Medline) from inception to January 10, 2024. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of critically ill adults comparing MB with placebo or usual care without MB administration. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers performed screening, full-text review, and data extraction. We pooled data using a random-effects model, assessed the risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool, and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to rate certainty of effect estimates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included six RCTs (302 patients). Compared with placebo or no MB administration, MB may reduce short-term mortality (RR [risk ratio] 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47-0.94], low certainty) and hospital length of stay (mean difference [MD] -2.1 d [95% CI, -1.4 to -2.8], low certainty). MB may also reduce duration of vasopressors (MD -31.1 hr [95% CI, -16.5 to -45.6], low certainty), and increase mean arterial pressure at 6 hours (MD 10.2 mm Hg [95% CI, 6.1-14.2], low certainty) compared with no MB administration. The effect of MB on serum methemoglobin concentration was uncertain (MD 0.9% [95% CI, -0.2% to 2.0%], very low certainty). We did not find any differences in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults with septic shock, based on low-certainty evidence, MB may reduce short-term mortality, duration of vasopressors, and hospital length of stay, with no evidence of increased adverse events. Rigorous randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of MB in septic shock are needed. REGISTRATION: Center for Open Science (https://osf.io/hpy4j).

Abnormalities of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis Assessed by Thromboelastometry in an Endotoxic Shock Model in Piglets Treated with Nitric Oxide and Hydrocortisone.

This is an animal model study to investigate changes in hemostasis during endotoxemic shock and to determine whether the combination of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) + intravenous hydrocortisone had an effect on clot formation and fibrinolysis. iNO selectively decreases pulmonary artery pressure, without affecting cardiac index or systemic vascular resistance; however, the results of studies on the possible consequences of iNO administration on coagulation are inconsistent and require further research. Thirty-four piglets were included. Administering endotoxin caused severe hypodynamic shock. Half of the animals received iNO (30 ppm) + hydrocortisone, starting 3 h after endotoxin infusion and continuing to the end of the study. All animals developed coagulation disorders, manifested by a tendency to hypocoagulation; at the same time, fibrinolysis was impaired. Coagulation and fibrinolysis disorders persisted after endotoxin infusion was discontinued, with worse severity in the animals that died before the study was terminated. Administering iNO + hydrocortisone did not cause further changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters, either during or after the endotoxin challenge, suggesting that potential therapeutic interventions with iNO to lower pulmonary arterial pressure will not affect hemostasis.

The REPERFUSE study protocol: The effects of vasopressor therapy on renal perfusion in patients with septic shock-A mechanistically focused randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of septic shock and together these conditions carry a high mortality risk. In septic patients who develop severe AKI, renal cortical perfusion is deficient despite normal macrovascular organ blood flow. This intra-renal perfusion abnormality may be amenable to pharmacological manipulation, which may offer mechanistic insight into the pathophysiology of septic AKI. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II on renal microcirculatory perfusion in a cohort of patients with septic shock. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single centre, mechanistically focussed, randomised controlled study, 45 patients with septic shock will be randomly allocated to either of the study vasopressors (vasopressin or angiotensin II) or standard therapy (norepinephrine). Infusions will be titrated to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) target set by the attending clinician. Renal microcirculatory assessment will be performed for the cortex and medulla using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and urinary oxygen tension (pO2), respectively. Renal macrovascular flow will be assessed via renal artery ultrasound. Measurement of systemic macrovascular flow will be performed through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and microvascular flow via sublingual incident dark field (IDF) video microscopy. Measures will be taken at baseline, +1 and +24hrs following infusion of the study drug commencing. Blood and urine samples will also be collected at the measurement time points. Longitudinal data will be compared between groups and over time. DISCUSSION: Vasopressors are integral to the management of patients with septic shock. This study aims to further understanding of the relationship between this therapy, renal perfusion and the development of AKI. In addition, using CEUS and urinary pO2, we hope to build a more complete picture of renal perfusion in septic shock by interrogation of the constituent parts of the kidney. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The REPERFUSE study was registered on Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06234592) on the 30th Jan 24.

In septic shock and CAP, hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone reduced 90-d mortality.

SOURCE CITATION: Heming N, Renault A, Kuperminc E, et al; APROCCHSS investigators and CRICS-TRIGGERSEP network. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2024;12:366-374. 38310918.

The role of systemic corticosteroids when treating infections in adult primary care.

Inflammatory response to aggressive infection is responsible not only for symptoms, especially pain, but also for severity, when the inflammatory cascade is violent, and provokes a deleterious cytokine storm. Due to their anti-inflammatory properties, corticosteroids are widely used in ambulatory medical practice. While their beneficial effects on some symptoms, particularly pain, are undeniable, so are the risks associated with their other properties (immunosuppression, neurostimulation, hypermetabolism), even during short-term administration at low doses. Following robust risk-benefit assessment, the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of a number of serious pathologies (septic shock, severe acute community-acquired pneumonia, and some forms of bacterial meningitis such as hypoxia-related pneumocystosis, etc.) is presently well-defined. The objective of this review is not to consider the role of corticosteroids in cases of severe infectious disease necessitating hospital-based management, or in contexts where there exists a clear consensus in favor of their utilization. This work represents an attempt to apprise the current state of knowledge on the interest of corticosteroids in the management of infections in adults in primary care. Corticosteroid treatment can be beneficial with regard to some of the infectious diseases treated in primary care. That said, when the benefit actually appears, it remains modest, and the level of evidence supporting the utilization of corticosteroids is low or moderate. In no situation is an indication for corticosteroid therapy official or even, at the very least, indisputable. With regard to the pathologies under consideration, corticosteroid prescription must imperatively be based on impeccable characterization of the clinical situation, diagnosis of severity, knowledge of the disease field, and risk-benefit assessment for a given patient.

Restrictive calcium replacement in septic shock: a multicenter before-after intervention study. / Reposición restrictiva de calcio en pacientes con shock séptico: estudio de intervención antes-después.

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in comparison with a liberal one in patients with septic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective before-after study that estimated the impact of implementing a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit between May 2019 and April 2021 were assigned to liberal calcium replacement, and those admitted between May 2021 and April 2022 were assigned to a restrictive protocol. The primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality. Patients were matched with propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients were included; liberal replacement was used in 453 patients and the restrictive replacement in 191. We paired 553 patients according to propensity scores, 386 in the liberal group and 167 in the restrictive group. Mortality did not differ significantly between the groups at 28 days (35.3% vs 32.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.29) or after resolution of septic shock (81.5% vs 83.8%; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09). Nor did scores on the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scale differ (2.1 vs 2.6; P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock was not associated with a decrease in 28-day mortality in comparison with use of a liberal protocol. However, we were able to reduce calcium replacement without adverse effects.

OBJETIVO: Investigar el efecto de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio frente a una estrategia liberal en pacientes con shock séptico. METODO: Estudio multicéntrico, antes-después y retrospectivo que evaluó el efecto de la implementación de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio en pacientes con shock séptico. Los pacientes que ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) entre mayo de 2019 y abril de 2021 se asignaron al grupo con administración liberal, y los que se presentaron entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 ­tras la implementación del protocolo­ al grupo con administración restrictiva. La variable de resultado principal fue la mortalidad a 28 días. Se realizó un emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 644 pacientes, 453 en el grupo liberal y 191 en el grupo restrictivo. De los que 553 se emparejaron (386 en el grupo liberal, y 167 en el grupo restrictivo). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en la mortalidad a los 28 días (35,3% vs 32,3%; HR: 0,97; IC 95%: 0,72-1,29), en la finalización del shock (81,5% vs a 83,8%; HR: 0,89; IC 95%: 0,73-1,09) ni en la puntuación de la escala SOFA (2,1 vs 2,6; p = 0,20). CONCLUSIONES: La implementación de un protocolo de administración restrictiva de calcio, en pacientes con shock séptico, no se asoció a una disminución de la mortalidad a los 28 días en comparación con una administración liberal. No obstante, la reposición de calcio podría reducirse sin efectos adversos.

[Corticosteroids in intensive care medicine]. / Kortikosteroide in der Intensivmedizin.

In the case of septic shock, recent studies show benefits from a combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone, but clear guideline recommendations are still lacking. For severe community-acquired pneumonia, early corticosteroid therapy is recommended. Corticosteroid therapy should not be used in influenza-associated community-acquired pneumonia. In contrast, a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate was observed for COVID-19 by the use of dexamethasone. Current guidelines also recommend the use of corticosteroids in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. These recommendations are based primarily on studies that started steroid therapy early. However, many questions such as the type of corticosteroid, the timing and duration of therapy, and the dosage still remain unanswered.

CENTRAL VENOUS-TO-ARTERIAL CARBON DIOXIDE PARTIAL PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AS A GUIDING PARAMETER FOR CARDIOTONIC DRUG ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE SEPTIC SHOCK.

ABSTRACT: Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (Pcv-aCO2) on the administration of cardiotonic drugs in patients with early-stage septic shock. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 120 patients suffering from septic shock. At admission, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Pcv-aCO2 of the patients were obtained. On the premise of mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mm Hg, the patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment approaches adopted by different doctors-control group: LVEF ≤50% and observation group: Pcv-aCO2 ≥ 6. Both groups received cardiotonic therapy. Results: The two groups of patients had similar general conditions and preresuscitation conditions ( P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had a higher mean arterial pressure, lactic acid clearance rate, and urine output after 6 h of resuscitation ( P < 0.05), but a lower absolute value of lactic acid, total fluid intake in 24 h, and a lower number of patients receiving renal replacement therapy during hospitalization ( P < 0.05). After 6 hours of resuscitation, the percentages of patients meeting central venous oxygen saturation and central venous pressure targets were not significantly different between the control and observation groups ( P > 0.05). There was no difference in the 28-day mortality rate between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pcv-aCO2 is more effective than LVEF in guiding the administration of cardiotonic drugs in the treatment of patients with septic shock.

Leptospirosis: a clinical and diagnostic challenge.

We present the case of a man in his early 50s who presented with a history of fever, malaise and jaundice. Initial investigations showed liver and renal dysfunction with no discernible cause for the septic process. On starting intravenous antibiotics, the patient developed a septic-shock-like reaction requiring transfer to intensive care. A diagnosis of leptospirosis was eventually established through an extensive and thorough history leading to a stepwise approach to investigations. Treatment targeting leptospirosis was delivered with noticeable clinical improvement.

Changes of PK/PD of Meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock and exploration of clinical rational administration plan: a prospective exploratory study.

This study aimed to explore the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters after meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock after gastrointestinal perforation, and to simulate the probability of different dosing regimens achieving different pharmacodynamic goals. The study included 12 patients, and utilized high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to monitor the plasma concentration of meropenem. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and %fT > 4MIC was compared among simulated dosing regimens. The results showed that in 96 blood samples from 12 patients, the clearance (CL) of meropenem in the normal and abnormal creatinine clearance subgroups were 7.7 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.1 L/h, respectively, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 22.6 ± 5.1 and 17.2 ± 5.8 L, respectively. 2. Regardless of the subgroup, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h regimen achieved a PTA > 90% when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. 1.0 g/q6h infusion regimen compared with other regimen, in most cases, the probability of making PTA > 90% is higher. For patients at low MIC, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. For patients at high MIC, a dose regimen of 1.0 g/q6 h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. Further research is needed to confirm this exploratory result.

The Effects of Dobutamine in Septic Shock: An Updated Narrative Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies.

The key objective in the hemodynamic treatment of septic shock is the optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This is usually achieved by the utilization of fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes. Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly recommended and used for this purpose. Despite the fact that dobutamine was introduced almost half a century ago in the treatment of septic shock, and there is widespread use of the drug, several aspects of its pharmacodynamics remain poorly understood. In normal subjects, dobutamine increases contractility and lacks a direct effect on vascular tone. This results in augmented cardiac output and blood pressure, with reflex reduction in systemic vascular resistance. In septic shock, some experimental and clinical research suggest beneficial effects on systemic and regional perfusion. Nevertheless, other studies found heterogeneous and unpredictable effects with frequent side effects. In this narrative review, we discuss the pharmacodynamic characteristics of dobutamine and its physiologic actions in different settings, with special reference to septic shock. We discuss studies showing that dobutamine frequently induces tachycardia and vasodilation, without positive actions on contractility. Since untoward effects are often found and therapeutic benefits are occasional, its profile of efficacy and safety seems low. Therefore, we recommend that the use of dobutamine in septic shock should be cautious. Before a final decision about its prescription, efficacy, and tolerance should be evaluated throughout a short period with narrow monitoring of its wanted and side effects.

High-dose vitamin C improves norepinephrine level in patients with septic shock: A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The effects of vitamin C supplementation on patients with septic shock remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effects of different vitamin C dosages on norepinephrine (NE) synthesis in adult patients with septic shock. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with septic shock admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) between July 2021 and December 2022 were included. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: high-dose vitamin C (150 mg/kg/d, group A), low-dose vitamin C (50 mg/kg/d, group B), and placebo (group C). NE synthesis-related indicators (dopamine-ß-hydroxylase [DßH], tyrosine hydroxylase [TH], tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4], and dopamine [DA]), plasma NE, and vitamin C levels were measured every 24 hours and analyzed. All-cause mortality within 28 days and other clinical outcomes (including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE], Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA], and Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome [MODS] scores) were compared. RESULTS: Changes in TH, BH4, and DßH levels at 96 hours in groups A and B were greater than those in group C. These differences became more pronounced over the course of the intravenous vitamin C administration. Significant differences between groups A and C were detected at 96-hours TH, 72-hours BH4, 96-hours BH4, 96-hours DA, and DßH levels every 24 hours. The 96-hours TH, 96-hours BH4, and 48-hours DßH in group B were significantly higher than those in group C. The NE levels every 24 hours in groups A and B were higher than those in group C, group A and group C had a statistically significant difference. The 96-hours exogenous NE dosage in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in group C. No significant reductions in APACHE, SOFA, or MODS scores were observed in the vitamin C group, including the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation. The 28-days mortality was lower in groups A and B than in group C (0%, 10%, and 16.67%, P = .187), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: For patients with septic shock, treatment with vitamin C significantly increased TH, BH4, and DßH levels and reduced the exogenous NE dosage, but did not significantly improve clinical outcomes.

VASOPRESSOR REDUCTION EFFECT OF POLYMYXIN B HEMOPERFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH PERITONITIS-INDUCED SEPTIC SHOCK: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS.

ABSTRACT: Background : This study aimed to evaluate the effect of polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) in patients with peritonitis-induced septic shock who still required high-dose vasopressors after surgical source control. Methods : This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at Seoul National University Hospital between July 2014 and February 2021 who underwent major abdominal surgery to control the source of sepsis. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether PMX-HP was applied after surgery or not. The primary and secondary endpoints were the vasopressor reduction effect, and in-ICU mortality, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the vasopressor reduction effect. Results : A total of 338 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 23 patients underwent PMX-HP postoperatively, whereas 315 patients did not during the study period. Serum norepinephrine concentration decreased over time regardless of whether PMX-HP was applied. However, it decreased more rapidly in the PMX-HP(+) group than in the PMX-HP(-) group. There were no significant differences in demographics including age, sex, body mass index, and most underlying comorbidities between the two groups. Risk factors for in-ICU mortality were identified by comparing patient characteristics and perioperative factors between the two groups using multivariate analysis. Conclusion : For patients with peritonitis-induced septic shock, PMX-HP rapidly reduces the requirement of vasopressors immediately after surgery but does not reduce in-ICU mortality. This effect could potentially accelerate recovery from shock, reduce sequelae from vasopressors, and ultimately improve quality of life after discharge.

Efficacy of dietary supplements on mortality and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIM: The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to investigate the effects of different dietary supplements on the mortality and clinical status of adults with sepsis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials until February 2023. The inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT)s; 2) adults suffering sepsis or septic shock; 3) evaluation of short- or long-mortality; and 4) publications between 1994 and 2023. The general information of studies and details of interventions were extracted. The primary outcome was short-term mortality (<90 days), and the secondary outcomes were long-term mortality (≥90 days), length of ICU and hospital stays, and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 (ROB2). A random effect NMA was performed to rank the effect of each intervention using a frequentist approach. RESULTS: Finally, 56 RCTs with 5957 participants met the criteria. Approximately, one-third of RCTs were low risk of bias. NMA analysis revealed that there was no treatment more effective in short- or long-term mortality than control or other interventions, except for magnesium (RR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.79; GRADE = low) and vitamin C (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.99; low certainty evidence), which had beneficial effects on short-term mortality. Moreover, eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants (EPA + GLA + AOs) combination was the most effective, and magnesium, vitamin D and vitamin C were the other effective approaches in terms of duration of MV, and ICU length of stay. There was no beneficial dietary supplement for hospital stay in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients, none of the dietary supplements had a substantial effect on mortality except for magnesium and vitamin C, which were linked to lower short-term mortality with low certainty of evidence. Further investigation into high-quality studies with the use of dietary supplements for sepsis should be highly discouraged.