Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.098
Filter
1.
Saudi Med J ; 45(6): 585-590, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of various frontal sinus fractures (FSF) and examine the relationships between these fractures, types of treatments, and potential complications. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study analyzed the records of patients who were diagnosed and treated with FSF from 2011-2021. Files with missing documents or incomplete treatment were excluded. The retrieved data includes: patients age, gender, types, locations, treatment, and complications of FSF. Data was analyzed by the statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics, version 23.0 using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 72 cases were included, 94.4% males and 5.6% females. Road traffic accidents were the common cause of trauma (91%). Frontal sinus fractures were unilateral in 59.7% and associated other injuries in 80.6% of cases. Anterior table fractures were the largest proportion (58.3%), followed by anterior and posterior table (37.5%). The carried out surgical procedures were obliteration (23.9%), cranialization and obliteration (23.9%), and fixation only (52.2%). The post-operative complications were categorized into; neurological (22.2%), ophthalmic (15.3%), infection (2.8%), and deformity (16.7%). Anterior and posterior table had the highest percentage among these categories. CONCLUSION: Frontal sinus fractures were mostly required surgical treatment (63.9%) and post-operative complications occurred especially the neurological and ophthalmic. We recommend studies on the association of complications and different types of obliteration materials.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Frontal Sinus , Skull Fractures , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Frontal Sinus/injuries , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Adult , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/therapy , Skull Fractures/surgery , Middle Aged , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Child
2.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 306, 2024 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to perform a head-to-head comparison of the role of general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA) in the management of patients with nasal bone fractures (NBFs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. Studies investigating the clinical outcomes of GA and LA in the management of NBFs were included. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity between the included studies was evaluated. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for cosmetic results, residual septal deformity, the need for further surgery, patients' satisfaction with the anesthesia procedure, and patients' satisfaction with the surgery results were 0.70 (95% CI 0.18, 2.64; z = - 0.53, p = 0.5957), 1.11 (95% CI 0.37, 3.30; z = 0.18, p = 0.8558), 1.19 (95% CI 0.65, 2.20; z = 0.56, p = 0.5760), 1.57 (95% CI 0.92, 2.69; z = 1.65, p = 0.0982), and 1.00 (95% CI 0.55, 1.80; z = - 0.00, p = 0.9974). CONCLUSIONS: Insignificant difference on clinical outcomes was observed between GA and LA in the manipulation of patients with NBFs, and the choice of anesthetic approach should be based on the tolerability of the methods and the severity of nasal fractures.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Nasal Bone , Humans , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Nasal Bone/injuries , Nasal Bone/surgery , Anesthesia, General/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Skull Fractures/surgery , Patient Satisfaction
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures (NOE) fractures are uncommon but critical injuries. This review aims to investigate the patient factors, procedural factors, and postoperative outcomes associated with the surgical management of NOE fractures. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched between 1993 and 2023 using the search strategy "(naso-orbito-ethmoidal OR nasoethmoid OR nasoorbitoethmoidal) AND fracture." Articles reporting clinical studies investigating the surgical management of NOE fractures were included. Articles that were duplicates, non-English, or non-full text; reported an unclear age range; reported insufficient data; and/or reported on a sample size less than 10 were excluded. Data on patient factors, procedural factors, and postoperative outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Of the 412 articles identified, 6 eligible articles (retrospective case series) representing 95 adult cases and 84 pediatric cases were included. The mean ages were 29.0 and 10.2 years, respectively. Most cases were male (65.3%; 73.9%). Motor vehicle accidents were the most common mechanism of injury (79.2% and 50.0%, respectively). Coronal incision was the most common approach. Epiphora (n = 33) and scar problems (n = 21) were the most common complications in adult and pediatric cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Further robust longitudinal studies with a clear description of fracture classification and surgical timing would be helpful. Gaps in knowledge include concomitant injuries, digitally-assisted applications, and risk factors for adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Ethmoid Bone , Nasal Bone , Orbital Fractures , Skull Fractures , Humans , Orbital Fractures/surgery , Ethmoid Bone/injuries , Ethmoid Bone/surgery , Skull Fractures/surgery , Nasal Bone/injuries , Nasal Bone/surgery
4.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 32(4): 234-238, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695542

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the current literature on management of facial nerve disorder secondary to trauma, with a focus on the utility of electrodiagnostic testing in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with facial palsy related to temporal bone fractures should be started on high-dose corticosteroids as early as possible. Recent literature on the benefit of surgical intervention in the setting of temporal bone fracture is mixed. Some studies support early surgical decompression whereas others have found no benefit compared with conservative treatment. SUMMARY: The management of facial nerve trauma is based on location and extent of injury. Extratemporal trauma and transected nerve should be treated with surgical exploration and tension-free coaptation ideally within 72 h. There are no guidelines for intratemporal facial nerve trauma. Surgical decompression compared with medical management is debated in the literature without consensus and more large studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Facial Nerve Injuries , Humans , Facial Nerve Injuries/therapy , Facial Nerve Injuries/etiology , Facial Nerve Injuries/complications , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Temporal Bone/injuries , Skull Fractures/complications , Skull Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/therapy , Electrodiagnosis
5.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(6): 743-747, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580560

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare closed percutaneous screw reduction to traditional open reduction-internal fixation (OR-IF) for the treatment of anterior table fractures. Both groups were evaluated in terms of operative variables, complications, and treatment success. Of 32 patients included, 19 patients underwent OR-IF, while 13 underwent percutaneous screw reduction. The median operative time, length of hospital stays, and treatment cost of the OR-IF group were 100 min (range 60-130), 4 days (range 3-9), and $727 (range $642-$1291), respectively. The same variables for the closed reduction group were 30 min (range 20-40), 2 days (range 1-2), and $303 (range $252-$349), respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited a shorter operative time (p< 0.001), reduced length of hospital stays (p< 0.001), lower treatment cost (p< 0.001), and a lower complication rate (p = 0.025) compared to the OR-IF group. Late-term outcomes in both groups showed no visible contour changes or step deformities. In conclusion, the percutaneous screw reduction technique is a safe and effective option with minimal morbidity in the treatment of frontal sinus anterior table fractures. Therefore, traditional OR-IF should be reserved for fractures that are not suitable for reduction using minimally invasive techniques.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Frontal Sinus , Open Fracture Reduction , Skull Fractures , Humans , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Frontal Sinus/injuries , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Skull Fractures/surgery , Aged , Young Adult , Length of Stay , Operative Time , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Closed Fracture Reduction/methods
6.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 178, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649598

ABSTRACT

Elevated skull fracture (ESF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening type of skull fracture. The literature on this topic is relatively sparse. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis of all the patients reported in the literature with ESFs with respect to their clinical management to better inform practice. On 20th of January 2023, we conducted a systematic search of literature to find all published cases of ESF. We also conducted a retrospective review of ESF cases from our institution. The data collection and analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After screening, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 104 individual patients were included in the meta-analysis, with a median age of 24 years and 85.7% of whom were males. 11 patients (11.2%) had an unfavorable outcome while 37 (35.2%) had one or more complications. We found that GCS on admission is an independent predictor of poor outcome in ESF (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.605 (1.110-2.315), p value = 0.012). Regarding complications, dural injury (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 66.667 (7.407-500.00), p value < 0.001) and multiple bone involvement (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 6.849 (2.127-22.222), p value = 0.001) were independent predictors of complication. ESFs represent a rare yet consequential form of cranial injury, carrying potentially life-threatening implications if not promptly addressed. In this study, we present the meta-analysis of outcomes and complications within this patient cohort, offering a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature on this pathology. However, further investigation is imperative to provide higher-quality evidence and address lingering uncertainties in the classification and management of ESFs.


Subject(s)
Skull Fractures , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/surgery
7.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 40(7): 2145-2151, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530414

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To introduce a method of cranial bone reconstruction for cranial burst fractures and early-stage growing skull fractures, named bone flap binding and transposition. METHODS: Cranial burst fractures, severe head injuries predominantly observed in infants, are characterized by widely diastatic skull fractures coupled with acute extracranial cerebral herniation beneath an intact scalp through ruptured dura mater. These injuries can develop into growing skull fractures. This study included two cases to illustrate the procedure, with a particular focus on the bone steps in managing these conditions. The medical history, clinical presentation, surgical procedures, and postoperative follow-up were retrospectively studied. The details of the surgical procedure were described. RESULTS: The method of bone reconstruction, named bone flap binding and transposition, was applied after the lacerated dural repair. Two bone pieces were combined to eliminate the diastatic bone defect and then fixed by an absorbable cranial fixation clip and bound by sutures. The combined bone flap was repositioned into the bone window, completely covering the area of the original dural laceration. Subsequently, the bone defect was transferred to the area of normal dura. The postoperative courses for the two infants were uneventful. Follow-up CT scans revealed new bone formation at the previous bone defect and no progressive growing skull fracture. The major cranial defects had disappeared, leaving only small residual defects at the corners of the skull bone window, which required further recovery and did not affect the solidity of the skull. CONCLUSION: Bone flap binding and transposition provide a straightforward, cost-effective, and reliable method for cranial bone reconstruction of cranial burst fractures and early-stage growing skull fractures. This method has taken full advantage of the small infant's dura osteogenic potential without the need for artificial or metallic bone repair materials. The effectiveness of the method needs further validation with more cases in the future.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Skull Fractures , Surgical Flaps , Humans , Skull Fractures/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Infant , Male , Female , Skull/surgery , Skull/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
8.
World Neurosurg ; 186: e81-e86, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Comminuted fractures of the anterior skull base can easily cause dural damage, leading to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and retrograde infection. Skull base reconstruction is essential. This study aimed to present a novel and simple technique for repairing skull base defects using a self-made fascia-bone fragments-fascia "sandwich" structure made by fascia, fracture fragments, and sutures. METHOD: From 2018 to 2023, we performed self-made sandwich structures for skull reconstruction in 10 patients with anterior skull base comminuted fractures. After debridement, the intracranial bone fragments of the surgical patient were safely removed. In vitro, the bone fragments were spread between two layers of temporal or broad fascia to form a sandwich structure similar to the size of the bone defect, and the periphery was firmly sutured with sutures. The self-made structure was then filled to the defect and fixed with fibrin glue. The periosteum at the top of the forehead was also turned over to the repair area for covering and fixation. Meanwhile, a facial skin cosmetic suture was performed. Finally, we evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this technique. RESULTS: All 10 patients underwent reconstructive surgery using the self-made fascia-fracture fragments-fascia sandwich structure. Five patients with open wounds on the face also underwent cosmetic revisions. No cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in all the patients at discharge as well as 3 months later. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with comminuted fracture of the anterior skull base, the fascia-bone fragments-fascia structure could repair the skull base and prevent the occurrence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Comminuted , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Skull Base , Humans , Male , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Skull Base/surgery , Skull Base/injuries , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Skull Fractures/surgery , Young Adult , Fascia/transplantation , Aged
9.
World Neurosurg ; 185: e1086-e1092, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the mechanism of occipital condyle fractures (OCFs), their clinical symptoms, computer tomography (CT) scan findings, treatment options, and classification. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with OCFs who were admitted to our neurosurgery center between 2017 and 2023. RESULTS: The investigation covered their clinical symptoms, CT scan results, and treatment outcomes. It was found that 25.6% of the patients suffered from severe craniocerebral injuries with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 points, 9.3% had moderate injuries with GCS scores of 9-12 points, and 65.1% exhibited mild injuries with GCS scores of 13-15 points. Of these patients, 90.7% showed improvement upon discharge, 4.7% succumbed to their injuries, and another 4.7% developed paraplegia. Symptoms indicative of OCF in individuals with CCJ injuries included neck pain, swelling, cranial nerve palsy, and posterior pharyngeal wall swelling. Frequently observed complications in OCF patients included cerebral contusion, occipital bone fractures, and skull base fractures. Employing thin-layer CT scans of the CCJ area, along with sagittal and coronal CT reconstructions, is essential for identifying OCFs. The fractures were classified into 3 types based on the Anderson-Montesano classification, which, when modified, provides enhanced treatment guidance. CONCLUSIONS: OCFs are predominantly present in cases of high-energy trauma, with high-resolution thin-layer CT scans serving as the preferred diagnostic method. The application of the modified Anderson-Montesano classification, distinguishing between stable and unstable fractures, facilitates the determination of suitable treatment strategies. Stable OCFs can be managed using a rigid neck brace, while unstable OCFs may require Halo-vest frame fixation or surgical intervention.


Subject(s)
Occipital Bone , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Occipital Bone/diagnostic imaging , Occipital Bone/injuries , Occipital Bone/surgery , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery , Glasgow Coma Scale , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 91: 276-283, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of BoneTape™, a new resorbable bone fixation device, using a zygomatic fracture model in rabbits. METHODS: The study followed BoneTape™ samples and control (sham) groups over 2-, 6-, and 12-week periods post-zygomaticomaxillary (ZM) osteotomy and zygomaticofrontal (ZF) disarticulation. The osteotomized segments were analyzed for bone healing, inflammatory response, and tissue healing. µCT imaging and histological analysis were used to examine the axial alignment, offset, and quality of new bone formation. RESULTS: BoneTape™ samples demonstrated enhanced maintenance of the initial intraoperative positioning, reduced axial offset, and better alignment when compared with the control group, enabling stable bone healing under physiological loading conditions. Complete union was observed at 12-weeks in both groups. The BoneTape™ group experienced minimal immune and tissue reactions, classically associated with wound healing, and showed an increased number of giant cells at 6 and 12-weeks. CONCLUSION: BoneTape™ represents a promising advancement in osteosynthesis, demonstrating efficacy in maintaining stable zygomatic reconstruction and eliciting minimal immune response in a rabbit model. This study introduces BoneTape™ as a disruptive solution specifically designed for clinical application in cranio-maxillofacial fracture fixation, with the potential to eliminate the use of over-engineered solutions while offering benefits such as ease of application and fewer biologically disruptive steps.


Subject(s)
Skull Fractures , Zygomatic Fractures , Animals , Rabbits , Zygomatic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Zygomatic Fractures/surgery , Internal Fixators , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation , Bone Plates
11.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(2): 229-235, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419218

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the patterns of maxillofacial injuries, aetiology and their management during the pandemic of Covid-19 in a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. METHODS: This is a single center, prospective cross-sectional study. Patients from all age groups who presented at the Emergency room of Jinnah Hospital Lahore and managed by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department during 1st December 2020 till 31st January 2021 were included. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 20.0. RESULTS: Total 202 patient were analyzed, 161 (79.7%) were male and 41 (20.3%) were females. Male to female ratio was 4:1. About fifty three percent of patients belonged to the age group 15-35 years. The most common cause was road traffic accidents (RTA), followed by fall. Eighty-three (41.1%) had only soft tissue injuries without any bony fracture and 119 (58.9%) had facial bones fractures. Zygomatic bone fracture was most common (53.8%) followed by mandible fracture (31.1%). Sixty-one out of 119 patients with fractures were treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Three patients had complete loss of vision because of facial trauma. Only 56 (28%) patients were managed under General Anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial pandemic era, a large majority of patients presenting with maxillofacial injuries were young male adults. The most common cause of maxillofacial trauma was RTAs. Soft tissue injuries were predominant followed by facial bone fractures and zygomatic bone was more frequent among the fracture cases. Covid-19 pandemic increased the difficulties faced in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maxillofacial Injuries , Skull Fractures , Soft Tissue Injuries , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Accidents, Traffic , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/surgery , Soft Tissue Injuries/epidemiology
12.
Otolaryngol Pol ; 78(1): 8-13, 2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332706

ABSTRACT

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Isolated frontal bone fractures constitute 5-15% of traumatic facial fractures cases, with frontal sinus fractures categorized into anterior wall, posterior wall, or complex fractures. The approach is tailored to fracture type and bone fragment displacement. This paper presents the summary of surgical management in patients with isolated and complex fractures of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus.</br> <b><br>Material and Methods:</b> Five patients with different frontal sinus fractures were treated surgically. The same management protocol - diagnosis and surgical intervention was implemented in all cases The retrospective analysis included fracture assessment, surgical approach, and long-term outcomes evaluation.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The most common cause of fractures was falls, while two complex fractures involved the anterior and posterior walls. External approach, bone fragment removal, endoscopy, and external stabilization were employed in all cases. One patent required delayed revision surgery due to retaining metallic foreign body. Follow-up radiological examinations showed proper healing and cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in all of the cases.</br> <b><br>Conclusion:</b> Surgical management of isolated fractures of the frontal sinus anterior wall, involving bone fragment removal, realignment, and endoscopy, yielded satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes without internal or external stabilization. Long-term monitoring and symptom assessment are crucial, especially in cases with penetrating injuries and foreign body risk.</br>.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Frontal Sinus , Skull Fractures , Humans , Frontal Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Frontal Sinus/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/etiology
13.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 47, 2024 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286923

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Penetrating craniocerebral injury associated with depressed skull fracture is an infrequent yet timely neurosurgical emergency. Such injury frequently occurs in the frontal region during traffic accident or stone throw in the civilian setting. As military neurosurgeons, we present our experience in the surgical debridement and reconstruction of this peculiar type of traumatic brain injury. METHODS: The patient lies supine, the head in neutral position heal by a Mayfield head clamp. The first step is the debridement of the frontal wound. Then, the depressed skull fracture is operated on using a tailored coronal approach through Merkel dissection plane, in order to keep a free pericranial flap. The bone flap is cut around the depressed skull fracture. Neuronavigation allows to locate the frontal sinus depending on whether it has been breached and thus requires cranialization. Brain and dura mater debridement and plasty are performed. Cranioplasty is performed using either native bone fragments fixed with bone plates or tailored titanium plate if they are too damaged. CONCLUSION: Performing wounded skin closure first and then a tailored coronal approach with free pericranial flap and a craniotomy encompassing the depressed skull fracture allows to treat frontal penetrating craniocerebral injury in an easy-to-reproduce manner.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma , Free Tissue Flaps , Skull Fracture, Depressed , Skull Fractures , Wounds, Penetrating , Humans , Skull Fracture, Depressed/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fracture, Depressed/surgery , Skull/surgery , Craniocerebral Trauma/surgery , Craniotomy , Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Skull Fractures/complications , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery
14.
Laryngoscope ; 134(7): 3120-3126, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To discuss patient demographics and management and better understand the economic impact associated with the treatment of facial fractures at a major metropolitan level 1 trauma center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: We identified 5088 facial fractures in 2479 patients who presented from 2008 to 2022. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, treatment information, and hospital charges were collected and analyzed to determine factors associated with surgical management and increased cost burden. RESULTS: Our 14-year experience identified 1628 males and 851 females with a mean age of 45.7 years. Orbital fractures were most common (41.2%), followed by maxilla fractures (20.8%). The most common mechanism was fall (43.0%). Surgical management was recommended for 41% of patients. The odds of surgical management was significantly lower in female patients, patients age 65 and older, and patients who presented after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The odds of surgical management was significantly higher for patients who had a mandible fracture or greater than 1 fracture. The average cost of management was highest for naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures ($37,997.74 ± 52,850.88), followed by LeFort and frontal fractures ($29.814.41 ± 42,155.73 and $27,613.44 ± 39.178.53, respectively). The highest contributor to the total average cost of management was intensive care unit-related costs for every fracture type, except for mandible fractures for which the highest contributor was operating room (OR)-related costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest comprehensive databases of facial fractures and one of the first to provide a descriptive cost analysis of facial trauma management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3120-3126, 2024.


Subject(s)
Skull Fractures , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Skull Fractures/economics , Skull Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/therapy , Adult , Aged , Facial Bones/injuries , Facial Bones/surgery , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/economics , Trauma Centers/economics , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Young Adult , Orbital Fractures/economics , Orbital Fractures/surgery , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data
15.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(4): 461-467, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) complex fractures present a challenge to repair. The classification system used to categorize the fracture type was established in 1991 based off the medial canthal tendon attachment. The primary objective was to systematically review the literature outlining repair techniques for NOE fracture after the adoption of the Markowitz classification system. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify peer-reviewed research. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed articles reporting on operative techniques used to repair NOE fractures in adult patients after 1991. Two investigators independently reviewed all articles and extracted data. Level of evidence was assessed by Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines. RESULTS: This review identified 16 articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria representing 517 patients. One article outlined a closed reduction technique with transnasal wiring. The remaining articles discussed open approaches with various exposure techniques, most common being the coronal incision. Miniplates and screws were most often implemented for rigid fixation as well as transnasal wiring to repair disrupted medial canthal tendon and canthal bearing bone in Type 2 and 3 NOE fractures. Ten of the studies included in this review had a level of evidence of 4. CONCLUSIONS: NOE fractures present a complex fracture pattern and challenge to repair. New exposure techniques and multidisciplinary approaches have been described. However, fixation techniques have remained relatively consistent through the years. Surgeon preference and comfort with performing the specific techniques leads to the best patient outcomes. With the low level of evidence referenced, more robust research is needed to evaluate these techniques.


Subject(s)
Facial Injuries , Orbital Fractures , Skull Fractures , Adult , Humans , Nasal Bone/surgery , Orbital Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/surgery , Nose , Eyelids/surgery , Ethmoid Bone/surgery
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(2): 485-487, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934956

ABSTRACT

This study introduces a method to overcome technical challenges in using intraoperative ultrasound for the closed reduction of nasal bone and zygomatic arch fractures. The curvature of the face makes it difficult to apply an ultrasound probe to the facial area. We used a solid gel pad as a coupling medium during surgery to improve the scanning of facial bone fractures. The results show that the fracture sites observed on preoperative computed tomography scans can be easily visualized using intraoperative ultrasound, and real-time manipulation confirms successful reduction. The solid gel pad is light, malleable, easy to use, and provides accurate images. Overall, the use of ultrasound with a solid gel pad enhances the accuracy of closed reduction in facial bone fracture surgeries, confirming fracture patterns and ensuring precise reduction.


Subject(s)
Skull Fractures , Zygomatic Fractures , Humans , Zygomatic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Zygomatic Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery , Ultrasonography , Facial Bones , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
18.
Pediatr Neurosurg ; 59(1): 14-19, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Several studies describe traumatic head injuries caused by ceiling fans in Australia, the Middle East, and Malaysia. Some injuries required neurosurgical intervention, especially those caused by metallic ceiling fans. This study describes traumatic head injuries caused by ceiling fans at a single pediatric level 1 trauma center in the Southern USA. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients under 18 years of age who presented with a traumatic injury to the head from a ceiling fan from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2021. The cohort of patients meeting all inclusion criteria was identified by querying multiple free-text fields derived from the electronic medical record, followed by a manual record review. RESULTS: Of 60 children treated for traumatic head injury from a ceiling fan, the median age was 5.7 years and 53% were female. Laceration was the most common injury (80%), followed by scalp swelling/hematoma (20%), contusion (8%), and skull fracture (7%). Two patients (3%) with intracranial hemorrhage and fracture underwent neurosurgery. One neurosurgical case involved a metal ceiling fan and the other involved an outdoor ceiling fan. Nearly half of the injuries involved bunk or loft beds (47%) and young children were often injured while being lifted up by a caregiver (18%). CONCLUSION: Although most pediatric traumatic head injuries from ceiling fans resulted in minor injuries, our center saw a similar proportion of cases with skull fractures to what has been reported in Australia (5%). The effects of fan construction and blade material on the severity of head injury may warrant further study. Understanding the most common mechanisms for these injuries may guide injury prevention efforts.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Craniocerebral Trauma , Skull Fractures , Child , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Male , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Skull Fractures/surgery , Intracranial Hemorrhages , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery
19.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(2): 104136, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101124

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the use of imaging in the management of nasal fracture in adults and determine if imaging is beneficial to clinical decision making when planning for surgery. A secondary objective of this study is to compare surgical rates for nasal fracture between pediatric and adult populations. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 357 patients seen at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center from January 2015 through January 2020 with a diagnosis of nasal fracture. An odds ratio was calculated to determine likelihood of surgical intervention between patients who had imaging of the nasal bones and patients who did not. RESULTS: 82 % of patients had either CT or X-ray imaging. The odds ratio of patients who had surgery after CT or X-ray imaging compared to patients who had surgery without prior imaging was 0.092 (95 % CI: 0.0448-0.1898, p-value <0.0001). A total of 54 (15 %) adult patients had surgery, in comparison to 50 % of pediatric patients with diagnosis of nasal fracture. 202 (57 %) of patients did not follow up after initial diagnosis by radiology. CONCLUSION: The statistical analysis suggests that while CT and X-ray are frequently obtained in the setting of nasal fracture, patients without imaging are more likely to have surgery (p < 0.05) than patients with imaging. This indicates that imaging is likely unnecessary for surgical planning. Most adults do not pursue surgery, and surgical rates for adults with nasal fracture are much lower than those of pediatric patients with nasal fracture.


Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Skull Fractures , Adult , Humans , Child , X-Rays , Rhinoplasty/methods , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Treatment Outcome , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/surgery , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
20.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(2): 104148, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of facial fractures is variable. Understanding how time to operative management impacts outcomes can help standardize practice. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2016 and 2019. Adult patients with operative facial fractures were isolated by ICD-10 procedure codes, and further stratified by fracture location, including the mandible, orbit, maxilla, zygoma, and frontal bone. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to predict in-hospital complications (both surgical and systemic complications) adjusting for time-to-operation, comorbidities, fracture location, AIS, and demographics. RESULTS: 1678 patients with operative facial fractures were identified. The median time-to-operation was 2 days (IQR 1.0-2.0 days). Most patients only had one operative fracture (95 %) and orbital fracture was the most common (44 %). The overall complication rate was higher for those operated after 2 days compared to those operated between 1 and 2 days and within 24 h (2.8 % vs 0.6 % vs 0.7 %; p < 0.001). Patients who were operated on after 48 h exhibited an increased risk of any complication (OR 4.72, 95 % CI 1.49-16.6, p = 0.010) on multivariable models. CONCLUSION: Delays in the management of facial fractures are associated with more in-hospital complications. However, the incidence of short-term postoperative complications remains low. Injury characteristics are the primary predictor of delays in operation, however Hispanic patients independently experienced delays in care.


Subject(s)
Facial Injuries , Skull Fractures , Surgical Wound , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Skull Fractures/surgery , Skull Fractures/complications , Hospitals , Facial Bones/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...