Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.537
Filter
1.
J Gen Virol ; 105(6)2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861287

ABSTRACT

Increased human-to-human transmission of monkeypox virus (MPXV) is cause for concern, and antibodies directed against vaccinia virus (VACV) are known to confer cross-protection against Mpox. We used 430 serum samples derived from the Scottish patient population to investigate antibody-mediated cross-neutralization against MPXV. By combining electrochemiluminescence immunoassays with live-virus neutralization assays, we show that people born when smallpox vaccination was routinely offered in the United Kingdom have increased levels of antibodies that cross-neutralize MPXV. Our results suggest that age is a risk factor of Mpox infection, and people born after 1971 are at higher risk of infection upon exposure.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Adult , Middle Aged , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Young Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Female , Adolescent , Aged , Male , Cross Protection/immunology , Scotland , Age Factors , Neutralization Tests , Child , Vaccination , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , Child, Preschool , Cross Reactions , Aged, 80 and over
2.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29728, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860589

ABSTRACT

Since May 2022, several countries outside of Africa experienced multiple clusters of monkeypox virus (MPXV)-associated disease. In the present study, anti-MPXV and anti-vaccinia virus (VACV) neutralizing antibody responses were evaluated in two cohorts of subjects from the general Italian population (one half born before the WHO-recommended end of smallpox vaccination in 1980, the other half born after). Higher titers (either against MPXV or VACV) were observed in the cohort of individuals born before the interruption of VACV vaccination. An association between VACV and MPXV antibody levels was observed, suggesting that the smallpox vaccination may confer some degree of cross-protection against MPXV infection. Results from this study highlight low levels of immunity toward the assessed Orthopoxviruses, especially in young adults, advocating the introduction of a VACV- or MPXV-specific vaccine in case of resurgence of monkeypox disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Monkeypox virus , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccination , Vaccinia virus , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Male , Adult , Female , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Italy/epidemiology , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Young Adult , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Middle Aged , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Adolescent , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/epidemiology , Cross Protection/immunology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Child
3.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2356153, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767199

ABSTRACT

Men who have sex with men and people living with HIV are disproportionately affected in the 2022 multi-country monkeypox epidemic. The smallpox vaccine can induce cross-reactive antibodies against the monkeypox virus (MPXV) and reduce the risk of infection. Data on antibodies against MPXV induced by historic smallpox vaccination in people with HIV are scarce. In this observational study, plasma samples were collected from people living with and without HIV in Shenzhen, China. We measured antibodies binding to two representative proteins of vaccinia virus (VACV; A27L and A33R) and homologous proteins of MPXV (A29L and A35R) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We compared the levels of these antibodies between people living with and without HIV. Stratified analyses were performed based on the year of birth of 1981 when the smallpox vaccination was stopped in China. Plasma samples from 677 people living with HIV and 746 people without HIV were tested. A consistent pattern was identified among the four antibodies, regardless of HIV status. VACV antigen-reactive and MPXV antigen-reactive antibodies induced by historic smallpox vaccination were detectable in the people born before 1981, and antibody levels reached a nadir during or after 1981. The levels of smallpox vaccine-induced antibodies were comparable between people living with HIV and those without HIV. Our findings suggest that the antibody levels against MPXV decreased in both people living with and without HIV due to the cessation of smallpox vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , HIV Infections , Monkeypox virus , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Male , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , Adult , Female , China/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/history , Vaccination , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/history , Cross Reactions/immunology , Young Adult , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Vaccinia virus/immunology
4.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 139-149, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801576

ABSTRACT

Variola virus is an anthroponotic agent that belongs to the orthopoxvirus family. It is an etiological agent of smallpox, an ancient disease that caused massive mortality of human populations. Twentieth century has witnessed the death of about 300 million people due to the unavailability of an effective vaccine. Early detection is the primary strategy to prevent an outbreak of smallpox. Variola virus forms the characteristic pus-filled pustules and centrifugal rash distribution in the infected patients while transmission occurs mainly through respiratory droplets during the early stage of infection. No antiviral drugs are approved for variola virus till date. Generation of first-generation vaccines helped in the eradication of smallpox which was declared by the World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Smallpox , Variola virus , Humans , Variola virus/pathogenicity , Variola virus/genetics , Variola virus/physiology , Smallpox/virology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/transmission , Animals , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control
5.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 273-287, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801584

ABSTRACT

Smallpox was a significant cause of mortality for over three thousand years, amounting to 10% of deaths yearly. Edward Jenner discovered smallpox vaccination in 1796, which rapidly became a smallpox infection preventive practice throughout the world and eradicated smallpox infection by 1980. After smallpox eradication, monkeypox vaccines have been used primarily in research and in outbreaks in Africa, where the disease is endemic. In the present, the vaccines are being used for people who work with animals or in high-risk areas, as well as for healthcare workers treating patients with monkeypox. Among all orthopoxviruses (OPXV), monkeypox viral (MPXV) infection occurs mainly in cynomolgus monkeys, natural reservoirs, and occasionally causes severe multi-organ infection in humans, who were the incidental hosts. The first case of the present epidemic of MXPV was identified on May 7, 2022, and rapidly increased the number of cases. In this regard, the WHO declared the outbreak, an international public health emergency on July 23, 2022. The first monkeypox vaccine was developed in the 1960s by the US Army and was based on the vaccinia virus, which is also used in smallpox vaccines. In recent years, newer monkeypox vaccines have been developed based on other viruses such as Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA). These newer vaccines are safer and can provide longer-lasting immunity with fewer side effects. For the future, there is ongoing research to improve the current vaccines and to develop new ones. One notable advance has been the development of a recombinant vaccine that uses a genetically modified vaccinia virus to express monkeypox antigens. This vaccine has shown promising results in pre-clinical trials and is currently undergoing further testing in clinical trials. Another recent development has been the use of a DNA vaccine, which delivers genetic material encoding monkeypox antigens directly into cells. This type of vaccine has shown effectiveness in animal studies and is also undergoing clinical testing in humans. Overall, these recent advances in monkeypox vaccine development hold promise for protecting individuals against this potentially serious disease.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Animals , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/history , History, 21st Century , History, 20th Century , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Poxviridae Infections/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/epidemiology , Poxviridae/immunology , Poxviridae/genetics , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Vaccination , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Vaccine Development
6.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 301-316, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801586

ABSTRACT

The smallpox infection with the variola virus was one of the most fatal disorders until a global eradication was initiated in the twentieth century. The last cases were reported in Somalia 1977 and as a laboratory infection in the UK 1978; in 1980, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared smallpox for extinct. The smallpox virus with its very high transmissibility and mortality is still a major biothreat, because the vaccination against smallpox was stopped globally in the 1980s. For this reason, new antivirals (cidofovir, brincidofovir, and tecovirimat) and new vaccines (ACAM2000, LC16m8 and Modified Vaccine Ankara MVA) were developed. For passive immunization, vaccinia immune globulin intravenous (VIGIV) is available. Due to the relationships between orthopox viruses such as vaccinia, variola, mpox (monkeypox), cowpox, and horsepox, the vaccines (LC16m8 and MVA) and antivirals (brincidofovir and tecovirimat) could also be used in the mpox outbreak with positive preliminary data. As mutations can result in drug resistance against cidofovir or tecovirimat, there is need for further research. Further antivirals (NIOCH-14 and ST-357) and vaccines (VACΔ6 and TNX-801) are being developed in Russia and the USA. In conclusion, further research for treatment and prevention of orthopox infections is needed and is already in progress. After a brief introduction, this chapter presents the smallpox and mpox disease and thereafter full overviews on antiviral treatment and vaccination including the passive immunization with vaccinia immunoglobulins.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/history , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Variola virus/immunology , Variola virus/genetics , Animals , Cytosine/analogs & derivatives , Cytosine/therapeutic use , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/pathogenicity , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Immunization, Passive/methods , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Isoindoles/therapeutic use , Cidofovir/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Benzamides , Phthalimides
7.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 289-300, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801585

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox virus (MPXV) of poxviridae family causes a zoonotic disease called monkeypox (Mpox). MPXV cases have a fatality ratio ranging from 0 to 11% globally and have been more prevalent in children. There are three generations of smallpox vaccines that protect against MPXV. First and second generation of the vaccinia virus (VACV) vaccine protects MPXV. However, various adverse side effects were associated with the first and second generations of vaccines. In contrast, the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) replication-incompetent vaccine shows fewer adverse effects and a significant amount of neutralizing antibodies in mammalian cells. A third-generation Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) was approved to prevent Mpox in 2019. Recently, MVA-BN-based Imvanex, Imvamune, and JYNNEOS vaccines have also been administered against MPXV. Globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global health emergency in May 2022 due to increased MPXV cases. Various computational studies have also designed a multi-epitope-based vaccine against the MPXV. In the multi-epitope-based vaccine, different epitopes like B-cell, Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL), CD8+, and CD4+ epitopes were derived from MPXV proteins. Further, these epitopes were linked with the help of various linkers to design a multi-epitope vaccine against MPXV. In summary, we have provided an overview of the current status of the vaccine against MPXV.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccine Development , Humans , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Animals , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology
8.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 317-330, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801587

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox has been endemic in Congo and Nigeria for at least five decades. Since early May 2022, there have been numerous unprecedented outbreaks throughout the world in places without any previously reported cases. While a majority of the diagnosed cases have been within Europe and the Americas, several cases have occurred in non-endemic African countries. As of December 2022, 82,999 cases had been reported globally, prompting concern among the World Health Organization (WHO) members. While the WHO has not labeled this epidemic a Global Health Emergency, member states have begun to put forward plans to consolidate their emergency vaccine stockpiles and share the limited number of vaccines made by the single FDA-approved manufacturer, Bavarian Nordic. Many countries are concerned about how vaccines will be shared. Some of the larger donor States are positioned to be the biggest beneficiaries of vaccine sharing, while States from areas that have been suffering from the virus since the 1970s have not been allocated any. This pattern of vaccine distribution echoes that seen during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the similarities between Monkeypox and Smallpox, contact precautions and vaccination seem to be effective strategies to combat its rapid spread. We aim to evaluate how an eradication program model similar to that used for Smallpox can be applied to Monkeypox, and whether it can address vaccine inequity. To do this, we use a multi-pronged approach targeting disease surveillance, vaccine awareness, manufacturing, cost, and distribution strategies.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Vaccination , World Health Organization , Healthcare Disparities
9.
Vaccine ; 42(16): 3578-3584, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704259

ABSTRACT

The smallpox vaccine developed by Jenner in 1798 was successfully introduced in France in 1800 with the support of Napoleon Bonaparte. The medals and tokens (coin-like medals) issued to encourage early-day vaccination activities are described in the context of the changing political situation in that country. In 1800 a private society of subscribers, led by the Duke of La Rochefoucauld-Liancourt was created, along with a Vaccine Committee charged with evaluating the safety and efficacy of vaccination before deciding if vaccination should be extended to the entire population. The Vaccine Committee published a positive report in 1803, and in 1804, the Ministry of the Interior established the "Society for the extinction of smallpox in France by means of the propagation of the vaccine". The creation of the Society made smallpox vaccination an official activity of the empire, facilitating collaboration between government agencies. The vaccine institution, established by Napoleon in 1804, continued its functions until 1820 when the Royal Academy of Medicine was created and took over those functions. This case exemplifies the collaboration that was needed between science and politics to rapidly bring the recently developed smallpox vaccine to the needed population.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Vaccination , Smallpox Vaccine/history , France , Humans , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/history , History, 19th Century , History, 18th Century , Vaccination/history
10.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(6): e0046524, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700327

ABSTRACT

Smallpox is a highly contagious human disease caused by the variola virus. Although the disease was eliminated in 1979 due to its highly contagious nature and historical pathogenicity, with a mortality rate of up to 30%, this virus is an important candidate for biological weapons. Currently, vaccines are the critical measures to prevent this virus infection and spread. In this study, we designed a peptide vaccine using immunoinformatics tools, which have the potential to activate human immunity against variola virus infection efficiently. The design of peptides derives from vaccine-candidate proteins showing protective potential in vaccinia WR strains. Potential non-toxic and nonallergenic T-cell and B-cell binding and cytokine-inducing epitopes were then screened through a priority prediction using special linkers to connect B-cell epitopes and T-cell epitopes, and an appropriate adjuvant was added to the vaccine construction to enhance the immunogenicity of the peptide vaccine. The 3D structure display, docking, and free energy calculation analysis indicate that the binding affinity between the vaccine peptide and Toll-like receptor 3 is high, and the vaccine receptor complex is highly stable. Notably, the vaccine we designed is obtained from the protective protein of the vaccinia and combined with preventive measures to avoid side effects. This vaccine is highly likely to produce an effective and safe immune response against the variola virus infection in the body. IMPORTANCE: In this work, we designed a vaccine with a cluster of multiple T-cell/B-cell epitopes, which should be effective in inducing systematic immune responses against variola virus infection. Besides, this work also provides a reference in vaccine design for preventing monkeypox virus infection, which is currently prevalent.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Vaccines, Subunit , Variola virus , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/immunology , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/chemistry , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/chemistry , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/chemistry , Vaccines, Subunit/genetics , Humans , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Variola virus/immunology , Variola virus/genetics , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Molecular Docking Simulation , Peptides/immunology , Peptides/chemistry , Immunoinformatics
11.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3856, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719852

ABSTRACT

The Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine developed by Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) was widely deployed to prevent mpox during the 2022 global outbreak. This vaccine was initially approved for mpox based on its reported immunogenicity (from phase I/II trials) and effectiveness in animal models, rather than evidence of clinical efficacy. However, no validated correlate of protection after vaccination has been identified. Here we performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the available data to test whether vaccinia-binding ELISA endpoint titer is predictive of vaccine effectiveness against mpox. We observe a significant correlation between vaccine effectiveness and vaccinia-binding antibody titers, consistent with the existing assumption that antibody levels may be a correlate of protection. Combining this data with analysis of antibody kinetics after vaccination, we predict the durability of protection after vaccination and the impact of dose spacing. We find that delaying the second dose of MVA-BN vaccination will provide more durable protection and may be optimal in an outbreak with limited vaccine stock. Although further work is required to validate this correlate, this study provides a quantitative evidence-based approach for using antibody measurements to predict the effectiveness of mpox vaccination.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccine Efficacy , Animals , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Vaccination/methods , Vaccinia/immunology , Vaccinia/prevention & control , Monkeypox virus
14.
Vaccine ; 42(19): 4056-4065, 2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762357

ABSTRACT

We assessed early antibody responses after two doses of JYNNEOS (IMVANEX) mpox vaccine in the District of Columbia (D.C.) in persons at high risk for mpox without characteristic lesions or rash. Participants with PCR mpox negative specimens (oral swab, blood, and/or rectal swab) on the day of receipt of the first vaccine dose and who provided a baseline (day 0) serum sample and at least one serum sample at âˆ¼28, ∼42-56 days, or 180 days post vaccination were included in this analysis. Orthopoxvirus (OPXV)-specific IgG and IgM ELISAs and neutralizing antibody titers were performed, and longitudinal serologic responses were examined. Based on participants' IgG and IgM antibody levels at baseline, they were categorized as naïve or non-naïve. Linear mixed effects regression models were conducted to determine if IgG antibody response over time varied by age, sex, HIV status, and route of administration for both naïve and non-naïve participants. Among both naïve and non-naïve participants IgG seropositivity rates increased until day 42-56, with 89.4 % of naïve and 92.1 % of non-naïve participants having detectable IgG antibodies. The proportion of naive participants with detectable IgG antibodies declined by day 180 (67.7 %) but remained high among non-naïve participants (94.4 %). Neutralizing antibody titers displayed a similar pattern, increasing initially post vaccination but declining by day 180 among naïve participants. There were no significant serologic response differences by age, sex, or HIV status. Serologic response did vary by route of vaccine administration, with those receiving a combination of intradermal and subcutaneous doses displaying significantly higher IgG values than those receiving both doses intradermally. These analyses provide initial insights into the immunogenicity of a two-dose JYNNEOS PEP regimen in individuals at high risk of mpox exposure in the United States.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Humans , Male , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Orthopoxvirus/immunology , Vaccinia/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Cohort Studies
16.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1039, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the authorization of the Mpox vaccines, we aimed to identify determinants of the intention to get vaccinated, actively trying to receive vaccination, and for successfully receiving a vaccination in Germany employing the 5 C model of vaccination readiness. METHODS: Data stem from a cross-sectional online survey that was available online from August 13, 2022 to August 31, 2022. To assess the influence of the 5 C Model on vaccination behavior, we conducted a multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 3,338 participants responded to the survey, with 487 already vaccinated and 2,066 intending to receive a vaccination. Confidence and collective responsibility were positively associated with intention to get vaccinated, while complacency was negatively correlated. A higher score on the calculation scale increased the odds of intention to receive vaccination but not with actively having tried to receive a vaccination. Fewer perceived constraints were associated with higher odds to be vaccinated. Patients in practices that focus on HIV treatment were more likely to intend to get vaccinated, to have tried to get vaccinated and to be vaccinated, regardless of indication. While level of education had no impact, having an indication to get vaccinated was a strong predictor of vaccination behavior in all groups. CONCLUSION: Future vaccination campaigns should aim to reduce specific constraints of the target group and make vaccines widely available in primary care institutions beyond HIV-focused practices.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Educational Status , Intention , Vaccination
17.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675961

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate whether antibodies specific for the vaccinia virus (VV) are still detectable after at least 45 years from immunization. To confirm that VV-specific antibodies are endowed with the capacity to neutralize Mpox virus (MPXV) in vitro. To test a possible role of polyclonal non-specific activation in the maintenance of immunologic memory. METHODS: Sera were collected from the following groups: smallpox-vaccinated individuals with or without latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), unvaccinated donors, and convalescent individuals after MPXV infection. Supernatant of VV- or MPXV-infected Vero cells were inactivated and used as antigens in ELISA or in Western blot (WB) analyses. An MPXV plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was optimized and performed on study samples. VV- and PPD-specific memory T cells were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: None of the smallpox unvaccinated donors tested positive in ELISA or WB analysis and their sera were unable to neutralize MPXV in vitro. Sera from all the individuals convalescing from an MPXV infection tested positive for anti-VV or MPXV IgG with high titers and showed MPXV in vitro neutralization capacity. Sera from most of the vaccinated individuals showed IgG anti-VV and anti-MPXV at high titers. WB analyses showed that positive sera from vaccinated or convalescent individuals recognized both VV and MPXV antigens. Higher VV-specific IgG titer and specific T cells were observed in LTBI individuals. CONCLUSIONS: ELISA and WB performed using supernatant of VV- or MPXV-infected cells are suitable to identify individuals vaccinated against smallpox at more than 45 years from immunization and individuals convalescing from a recent MPXV infection. ELISA and WB results show a good correlation with PRNT. Data confirm that a smallpox vaccination induces a long-lasting memory in terms of specific IgG and that antibodies raised against VV may neutralize MPXV in vitro. Finally, higher titers of VV-specific antibodies and higher frequency of VV-specific memory T cells in LTBI individuals suggest a role of polyclonal non-specific activation in the maintenance of immunologic memory.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , B-Lymphocytes , Cross Reactions , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccinia virus , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Cross Reactions/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunologic Memory , Neutralization Tests , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Animals , Male , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Orthopoxvirus/immunology , Vaccination , Chlorocebus aethiops , Adult , Lymphocyte Activation , Vero Cells
18.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(8): e100, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442725

ABSTRACT

In response to the Mpox domestic epidemic, South Korea initiated a nationwide vaccination program in May 2023, administering a 0.1 mL intradermal dose of JYNNEOS (Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine, Bavarian Nordic) to a high-risk group. To investigate the adverse reactions after intradermal JYNNEOS vaccination, an anonymous online survey was conducted at the National Medical Center from May 22 to July 31, 2023. Overall, 142 individuals responded. Over 80% of the respondents reported local reactions of predominantly mild severity. The predominant local reactions were pruritus, redness, and swelling; their incidence rates after the first dose were 66.2%, 48.1%, and 49.4%, respectively; the corresponding rates after the second dose were 69.2%, 60.6%, and 53.8%. Fewer respondents reported systemic symptoms. The most common systemic symptom was fatigue, the incidence rates of which after the first and second doses were 37.7% and 24.6%, respectively. Overall, the intradermally administered JYNNEOS vaccine appeared well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccines , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Injections, Intradermal
19.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(4): 676-680, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have investigated the effectiveness of vaccination in decreasing the severity of breakthrough mpox. Our goal was to estimate the strength of the associations between recent mpox vaccination with MVA-BN and various clinical manifestations of the disease. METHODS: Telephone interviews using standardized questionnaires, upon notification and 28 days later, of the 403 persons with mpox reported to Montreal Public Health in 2022. MVA-BN vaccination data were obtained from the provincial immunization registry. The main outcomes were numbers of skin lesions and body sites affected, other clinical manifestations (OCM) compatible with mpox, complications, and hospitalization. FINDINGS: 155 persons with mpox (39% of 403) had received 1 dose of vaccine at least 14 days before symptom onset. One-dose vaccination, adjusting for age and HIV status, was significantly associated with fewer lesions, sites affected with lesions, and OCMs. HIV-positive persons with breakthrough mpox reported significantly more lesions, sites affected, and OCMs at initial interview, than HIV-negative ones. However, vaccination was associated with a lower risk of all outcomes to the same degree irrespective of HIV status. INTERPRETATION: One dose of MVA-BN vaccine was about 60% effective in decreasing the frequency and extent of clinical manifestations, among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative persons with breakthrough mpox. Beyond preventing infection, mpox vaccination can be promoted to reduce clinical manifestations in persons at risk for mpox, even if HIV+ . FUNDING: This work used data obtained as part of Montreal Public Health's 2022 mpox outbreak response and received no external funding.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Vaccination , Disease Outbreaks
20.
Cell ; 187(6): 1360-1362, 2024 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490180

ABSTRACT

The mpox outbreak in 2022 launched a vaccination campaign employing an existing vaccine with moderate protection, highlighting the lack of scalable Orthopoxvirus vaccines with optimal protection. In this issue of Cell, Zuiani et al. report pre-clinical findings of an mRNA-based mpox vaccine, paving the way for Phase I/II clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Viral Vaccines , mRNA Vaccines , Animals , Monkeypox virus/immunology , mRNA Vaccines/immunology , Primates , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...