Harold Gillies, pioneer of modern plastic surgery, and Donald Morton, pioneer of modern surgical oncology: Master problem-solvers and surgical role models.

Harold Gillies, plastic surgeon, and Donald Morton, surgical oncologist, were iconic pioneers in their respective fields. Both of them made their mark by identifying crucial practical problems and finding innovative ways of solving them. Gillies grappled with the challenge of restoring form and function to British military personnel injured in World War I, and he set up a dedicated facility for performing this work. He introduced many new reconstructive techniques that became the foundation of the modern specialty of plastic and reconstructive surgery, which he established and nurtured. Morton, in the United States, applied his problem-solving skills to the long-debated question of the best way to manage regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma. He developed the innovative technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy and initiated large-scale international clinical trials to establish its validity and clinical value. This and other important contributions to the emerging field of surgical oncology earned Morton his reputation as a pioneer and leader of that specialty. The problems that confronted Gillies and Morton were completely different, but both demonstrated remarkable skills as master problem-solvers in their respective fields and made extraordinary contributions to the body of knowledge and welfare of patients. All surgeons must be problem-solvers because every patient who presents for surgical management represents a new problem (or set of problems) to be addressed. As surgeons, we would do well to consider individuals such as Gillies and Morton as role models for our own problem-solving activities in day-to-day clinical practice.

Dr. Miguel Correa-Iturraspe: La cirugía plástica que ha vivido / Dr. Miguel Correa-Iturraspe: The plastic surgery he has lived

Trascribimos la conferencia brindada por el Dr. Miguel Alberto Correa-Iturraspe en el Hospital Fiorito, con motivo de un agasajo que le hicieron sus colegas del Servicio de Cirugía Plástica en 1987, unos años después de su retiro. Este texto resume "la cirugía plástica que ha vivido", así como algunos aspectos de su vida y de su forma de ser

We transcribe the conference given by Dr. Miguel Alberto Correa-Iturraspe at the Hospital Fiorito, on the occasion of a gift given to him by his colleagues from the Plastic Surgery Service in 1987, a few years after his retirement. This text summarizes "the plastic surgery that he has experienced", as well as some aspects of his life and his way of being

Hector Marino. Pionero de la Cirugía Plástica latinoamericana / Hector Marino. Pioneer Of Latin American Plastic Surgery

Héctor Marino (1905-1996) es considerado un pionero de la cirugía plástica Latinoamericana por sus importantes aportes. Fue miembro fundador de la Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Cirugía Plástica y la Sociedad Internacional de Cirugía Plástica Estética. Se describen algunos aspectos biográficos, su carrera profesional y su legado

Héctor Marino (1905-1996) is considered a pioneer of Latin American Plastic Surgery because of his important contributions. He was founding member of the Argentinean Plastic Surgery Society, the Latin American Plastic Surgery Society and the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS). Some biographical aspects, his professional career and his legacy are described.

[Beyond the trenches, two German pioneers of plastic surgery]. / Au-delà des tranchées, deux pionniers allemands de la chirurgie plastique.

Cosmetic and reconstructive surgery has existed in many forms since antiquity, but it was the impulse given by the Great War that gave birth to plastic and cosmetic surgery as we know it today. After the Great War, the names of the most famous pioneers of the allies' side are Sir Harold Gillies, Mac Indoe and also Hippolyte Morestin; however, the surgeons of the enemy axis, beyond the trenches, faced the same constraints with their own war casualties. We present the destinies of two great pioneers of plastic surgery within the beautiful German Bismarckian period: Professor Erich Lexer, and "non-professor" Jakob Joseph.

Editorial: A Tribute to Mediterranean Pioneers in Facial Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Physicians from the Mediterranean civilization were profoundly instrumental in the early development and contemporary advancement of the craniomaxillofacial field. These feats are scarcely studied or acclaimed. In this editorial, the authors explore the contributions of these major Mediterranean pioneers. METHODS: A literature review on the subject was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Mayo Clinic Libraries. RESULTS: Mediterranean medicine has recognized and managed craniomaxillofacial pathologies from as early as the 10th century. The first inscriptions were authored by Abu Alkasem al-Zahrawi and Serefeddin Sabuncuoglu. Starting in the 15th century, Leonardo da Vinci shed light on anatomy and esthetics at a time where Gasparo Tagliacozzi spearheaded maxillofacial techniques. The field during the Renaissance was dominated by Hippocrates Asclepiades. Varaztad Kazanjian revolutionized the armamentarium necessitated by mass emergencies during the World War. In the 20th century, Paul Tessier redefined the limits of craniomaxillofacial treatment by using facial osteotomies and developing refined surgical instruments. Modern day Sam Hamra, Enrico Robotti, and Daniel Labbé continue to lead educational and innovative fronts of the field. CONCLUSIONS: This essay highlights some important historical contributions to the fields of craniomaxillofacial and facial plastic surgery by pioneer surgeons from around the Mediterranean.

Tsugishige Kondo, The Father of Japanese Surgery: Exploring the History of Hideyo Noguchi's Hand Reconstruction With a Forearm Flap Before the Establishment of Plastic Surgery in Japan.

ABSTRACT: Hideyo Noguchi is one of the most famous scientists in Japan's history, and his portrait has adorned the ¥1,000 banknotes since 2004. He had a childhood burn injury resulting in severe hand scarring and contracture that plagued his early life and education.The resulting hand deformity required 3 separate reconstructions with the third and most complex surgery performed by Professor Tsugishige Kondo just before Noguchi's final medical doctor license examination in 1897. In this surgery, Kondo released the contractures using the first radial forearm flap performed in Japan long before the establishment of plastic surgery in the country.Reviewing the history of Kondo, we find that he likely learned the art of reconstructive surgery along with many other surgical techniques during his stay in Europe from 1891 to 1896 where he was mentored by 4 prominent surgeons of the era: Christian Albert Theodor Billroth, Vincenz Czerny, James Israel, and Carl Nicoladoni. During this period, Czerny reported performing the world's first breast reconstruction using lipoma transfer, and Nicoladoni performed the world's first thumb reconstruction with a chest flap and with toe-to-thumb transfer. Kondo may have watched these world's first operations and may have also been taught these innovative techniques including the forearm flap directly by these pioneers. He returned to Japan and successfully applied these reconstructive surgery methods in his practice and teaching, as evidenced by the landmark surgery of Hideyo Noguchi's hand, and laid the foundations for the development of plastic surgery in Japan.

Forgotten Pioneers of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery During the Medieval Period.

Sushruta who lived in India sometime between 1000 and 800 BC is traditionally recognized for being the "Father of Plastic Surgery." However, "plastic surgery" has been performed much earlier in antiquity, with the earliest origins of primitive procedures dating back to 1600 BC in Ancient Egypt on the southeastern shores of the Mediterranean. Some centuries later, simple plastic cosmetic surgeries were performed, as well on the Northern Mediterranean shores in ancient Greece and Rome to repair damaged parts caused by war mutilation, punishment, or humiliation. Afterward, there has been a historical gap moving rapidly from the Greco-Roman period to the European Renaissance. Ignoring valuable contributions made by surgeons of the Medieval period, like Albucasis and Avicenna, has denied scholars of the Arabic Golden Age that bridged the eastern and western cultures recognition. In fact, all Mediterranean populations, albeit not together or simultaneously, have participated in the development of plastic and reconstructive surgery art and science. All have made valuable innovations, together with others, which cumulatively have resulted in progressive buildup of knowledge and technical skills.

Plastic Surgeon Financial Compensation-Incentivization Models in Surgical Care Delivery: The Past, Present, and Future.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are critical for the success of any health care enterprise. However, few studies have examined the potential impact of value-based care on surgeon compensation. METHODS: This review presents value-based financial incentive models that will shape the future of surgeon compensation. The following incentivization models will be discussed: pay-for-reporting, pay-for-performance, pay-for-patient-safety, bundled payments, and pay-for-academic-productivity. Moreover, the authors suggest the application of the congruence model-a model developed to help business leaders understand the interplay of forces that shape the performance of their organizations-to determine surgeon compensation methods applicable in value-based care-centric environments. RESULTS: The application of research in organizational behavior can assist health care leaders in developing surgeon compensation models optimized for value-based care. Health care leaders can utilize the congruence model to determine total surgeon compensation, proportion of compensation that is short term versus long term, proportion of compensation that is fixed versus variable, and proportion of compensation based on seniority versus performance. CONCLUSION: This review provides a framework extensively studied by researchers in organizational behavior that can be utilized when designing surgeon financial compensation plans for any health care entity shifting toward value-based care.

Evidence-Based Medicine in Plastic Surgery: From Then to Now.

SUMMARY: Evidence-based medicine, as described by Dr. Sackett, is defined as the "conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence, combined with individual clinical expertise and patient preferences and values, in making decisions about the care of individual patients." In the late 2000s, seminal articles in Clinics in Plastic Surgery and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery introduced evidence-based medicine's role in plastic surgery and redefined varying levels of evidence. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons sponsored the Colorado Springs Evidence-Based Medicine Summit that set forth a consensus statement and action plan regarding the increased incorporation of evidence-based medicine into the field; this key meeting ushered a new era among plastic surgeons worldwide. Over the past decade, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has incorporated evidence-based medicine into the Journal through an increase in articles with level I and II evidence, new sections of the Journal, and the introduction of validated tools to help authors perform prospective and randomized studies that ultimately led to best practices used today. Plastic surgery is a specialty built on problem-solving and innovation, values starkly in-line with evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine is becoming more ingrained in our everyday practice and plastic surgery culture; however, we must work actively to ensure that we continue this trend. In the next decade, we will possibly see that level I and II evidence articles start to inhabit many of our journal issues.