Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.875
Filter
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 445, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955839

ABSTRACT

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that often leads to decreased quality of life. Prior research assessing stress and discrimination related to stigmatization of those with HS is limited. The aim of this study was to examine the association between HS and the following factors related to psychosocial well-being: stress, discrimination, and loneliness. We performed secondary analysis of participants 18 years and older registered in the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program in March 2024. The study sample was limited to individuals who had completed ≥ 1 of 4 psychosocial well-being surveys. Among 1,352 individuals with HS, 135 were included in the sample. Among 208,290 individuals without HS, 56,902 were included. The following surveys assessed loneliness, stress, perceived discrimination in everyday settings, and perceived discrimination in medical settings, respectively: the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, Everyday Discrimination Scale, and Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale. The association between HS and survey scores was modeled using multivariable linear regression adjusted for self-reported sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, age, and income. In an unadjusted model, those with HS reported a significantly higher degree of stress (MeanHS (SD) = 21.5 (4.74); Meannon-HS (SD) = 19.8 (3.98); p < 0.001), discrimination in everyday settings (MeanHS (SD) = 18.9 (8.16); Meannon-HS (SD) = 16.0 (7.06); p < 0.0001), and discrimination in healthcare settings (MeanHS (SD) = 1.77 (0.64); Meannon-HS (SD) = 1.56 (0.62); p < 0.001). After adjusting for sex, race, age, and income, the association between HS and discrimination in healthcare settings was non-significant; however, associations between HS and increased levels of perceived stress and everyday discrimination remained significant. Low survey completion rates and demographic differences between those who did and did not complete the study surveys may limit generalizability of results. Findings suggest that those with HS may benefit from regular screening for psychosocial well-being and provision of support resources.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Loneliness , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/psychology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Loneliness/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , United States/epidemiology , Social Stigma , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent
2.
Urolithiasis ; 52(1): 103, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960942

ABSTRACT

Kidney stones and infections significantly affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL); however, the relationship between urinary tract infections (UTIs) and HRQOL in patients with kidney stones remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship using the validated Chinese version of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire (C-WISQOL). We prospectively recruited 307 patients with kidney stones to complete the C-WISQOL before and after stone removal. The participants were diagnosed with UTI based on the presence of pyuria or bacteriuria with or without clinical symptoms. The psychometric properties of the C-WISQOL were statistically analyzed. Multivariate linear regression was used to predict the risk factors for impaired HRQOL in patients with stones and UTIs. The questionnaire is a reliable and robust tool for evaluating HRQOL in Chinese-speaking patients with urolithiasis. The UTI and kidney stone co-occurrence was significantly associated with female sex, diabetes mellitus, more previous stone events, higher antibiotic usage, positive stone- or UTI-related symptoms, and postoperative residual stones. The preoperative C-WISQOL scores and improvement in the HRQOL after stone removal in patients clinically diagnosed with UTI were significantly inferior to those in patients without UTI. The regression analyses showed that worse HRQOL was predicted by more previous stone events and positive stone- or UTI-related symptoms. In contrast, the presence of diabetes mellitus and postoperative residual stone fragments predicted a lower improvement in the HRQOL. These findings underscore UTI's harmful impact on perioperative HRQOL in patients with kidney stones and could help strategies benefit those patients.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Quality of Life , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Kidney Calculi/complications , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Urinary Tract Infections/psychology , Urinary Tract Infections/complications , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Aged , Psychometrics
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(20): 2629-2632, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855158

ABSTRACT

This editorial delves into the research article by Zeng et al published in the latest issue of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The manuscript contributes significantly to addressing the global health issue of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by introducing and validating the Exercise and Diet Adherence Scale (EDAS). The article effectively conveys the importance of the study, highlighting the prevalence of NAFLD, the lack of approved drugs for its treatment, and the crucial role of lifestyle correction. The use of the Delphi method for scale deve-lopment and the subsequent evaluation of its reliability add scientific rigor to the methodology. The results demonstrate that the scale is correlated with key lifestyle indicators, which makes it a promising tool for assessing patient adherence to interventions. The identification of specific score thresholds for predicting adherence to daily calorie intake and exercise adds practical value to the scale. The differentiation among scores indicative of good, average, and poor adherence enhances its clinical applicability. In conclusion, the manuscript introduces EDAS, a valuable instrument that can contribute substantially to the field of NAFLD research and clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Patient Compliance , Humans , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/therapy , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Life Style , Delphi Technique , Diet , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
7.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 343, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847915

ABSTRACT

While mechanical vibration lessens discomfort associated with injection site pain (ISP), many local anesthetic injectors (LAIs) do not use vibratory anesthetic devices (VADs). Injector preference of vibration device is influenced by functional concerns, but qualitatively there is an element of adoption that is driven by visual feedback. We sought to capture operator preferences of vibration device design elements to further understand why injectors do not use these devices. We conducted a survey of image preferences among nurses and medical assistants employed at 8 dermatological clinics to investigate barriers to VAD use. Images were electronically modified with features distinct from the original device (a VAD commonly used in clinical practice). Participants rated their likelihood and comfort of use of each VAD represented in the images. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare the rating of the unmodified VAD to each modified VAD within participants. A response rate of 100% was achieved with 35 participants (average age, 38.5 years; 6 (17.1%) male, 29 (82.9%) female). Despite 28 (80%) participants knowing that mechanical vibration reduces ISP, only 16 (45.7%) endorsed ever using mechanical vibration as topical anesthetic. Images modified by pattern, color, and sterility covering were rated significantly lower than the original, unmodified VAD image (plain white VAD), confirming that visual feedback does impact adoption. Through independent comment categorization, aesthetics were found to be important to LAIs. Aesthetic preferences opposing functional concerns may factor into the lack of VAD use. Defining these visual preference barriers to adoption may help promote VAD use during dermatologic procedures.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Vibration , Humans , Vibration/therapeutic use , Vibration/adverse effects , Female , Male , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Middle Aged , Equipment Design , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): e154-e155, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834216

ABSTRACT

Sunscreen is an essential component of sun protection. The most important characteristics for patient selection of sunscreens have not been evaluated. A cross-sectional survey study was performed at an academic dermatology office. The sunscreen characteristic chosen most frequently was SPF (75.2%). Fewer patients selected broad-spectrum (20.7%) and water-resistance (22.7%). There remains a gap in patient knowledge regarding AAD recommendations for sunscreen characteristics and educational initiatives may be required. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):e154-e155.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8324e  .


Subject(s)
Sunscreening Agents , Humans , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Sun Protection Factor , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Sunburn/prevention & control , Young Adult
9.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): 485-488, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834217

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prior authorizations (PAs) are administrative tasks commonly required by insurers to approve medications or therapies for patients. Dermatology practices frequently employ coordinators to focus on completing PAs, among other solutions. The degree to which this support is offered in academic centers and, importantly, how much time dermatology residents spend on PAs over educational pursuits is largely unknown. The authors sought to identify the impact of PAs on dermatology residents. METHODS: An IRB-approved (#NCR213814) 13-question survey was distributed nationwide to dermatology residents regarding the impact of PAs on aspects of clinical and scholarly activities.  Results: 150 of 1462 dermatology residents, 10.3%, responded to the survey. 70% of responding residents contribute to obtaining PAs. 58.7% indicated that their program employed a PA coordinator; though, of these, 63.6% still relied on residents for PAs. 84% indicated that for the following month they feared the burden of PAs would lead to a lapse in treatment for patients. 72.7% avoided prescribing certain medications due to PAs. 64% indicated the PA burden impedes their ability to perform scholarly activities. 80.7% indicated the PA burden contributed to burnout or decreased morale. CONCLUSION: Our data highlight that dermatology residents are negatively impacted by the burden of PAs, resulting in reduced time to study, research, and best care for their patients. Dermatology residents and patients would benefit from reducing the burden of PAs, especially on residents by reforms or regulations that reduce dermatologic PAs, or by academic institutions removing these responsibilities from residents as best as possible. Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):485-488.    doi:10.36849/JDD.7617.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Internship and Residency , Prior Authorization , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Prior Authorization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , United States , Adult
10.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): 450-455, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834221

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic condition that warrants close follow-up due to the risk of scarring. The optimal long-term management of pediatric vulvar and perianal lichen sclerosus (PVPLS) is unknown. This study aimed to identify diagnostic, treatment, and maintenance regimens among pediatric dermatologists and pediatric/adolescent gynecologists, as well as assess provider confidence and desire for guidance on long-term PVPLS management. METHODS: A cross-sectional 35-question survey was administered through the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) between 7/13/2021 and 8/30/2021 to ascertain PVPLS diagnostic and management regimens. RESULTS: Most responders were attending-level pediatric/adolescent gynecologists (46%) and pediatric dermatologists (41%). Although 85% of participants felt completely or very confident in diagnosing PVPLS, the majority (86%) desired further management guidelines. While the initial treatment was similar among providers, maintenance regimens and follow-up varied considerably, with only 42% recommending lifelong monitoring despite potential persistence into adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: While initial treatment was similar among practitioners, there was variation by specialty in subsequent management and a lack of uniformity in long-term follow-up. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal management of PVPLS and to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding long-term follow-up.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):450-455.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8084.


Subject(s)
Dermatologists , Gynecology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Child , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Gynecology/standards , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Male , Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus/diagnosis , Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus/therapy , Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus/drug therapy , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus/diagnosis , Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Gynecologists
11.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 253, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795157

ABSTRACT

Dyschromia is a top diagnosis among African Americans (AA). Sunscreen is an essential part of its management, but AA have low sunscreen use. We sought to examine the perception of sunscreen utility in dyschromia and photoaging among patients who identify as AA or Black. This cross-sectional study recruited participants from the Case Western Reserve University Academic Dental Clinic. Participants completed an electronic survey that contained questions related to sunscreen use, knowledge of the sun's role in hyperpigmentation and photoaging, and whether sunscreen could be used for hyperpigmentation and photoaging. Of the 151 participants recruited, 63.6% (n = 96) were women and 36.4% (n = 57) were men. Consistent with previous reports, participants had lower sunscreen use (20.5%) than whites (43.5%). The majority of participants (80.1% and 58.3%, respectively) didn't attribute the sun to hyperpigmentation or photoaging. Participants with dark/brown spots were significantly more likely to not attribute the sun to hyperpigmentation than those without spots. (p = 0.003) Limitations for this study include its small sample size, recall and reporter bias, question misinterpretation, and lack of question neutrality. This study highlights the knowledge gap of a major contributing factor to dyschromia which in turn could be leading to their view of the decreased utility of sunscreen.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Sunscreening Agents , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hyperpigmentation/prevention & control , Skin Aging/drug effects , Skin Pigmentation/drug effects , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
12.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(7): 611-615, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification can identify individuals in primary care settings who are at increased risk of developing melanoma. OBJECTIVE: Converting and implementing a validated risk stratification tool as a patient self-administered tablet-based survey. METHODS: Mackie risk stratification tool was transformed into a patient questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed in academic dermatologist practices by patients and dermatologists and revised to optimize sensitivity and specificity using physician assessment as gold standard. The optimized survey was administered before routine primary care visits during 2019 to 2021. High-risk patients were referred to dermatology. The number needed to screen (NNS), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to identify a melanoma were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 7,893 respondents, 5,842 (74%) and 2,051 (26%) patients were categorized as low-risk and high-risk population, respectively. The NNS to identify 1 melanoma was 64 in the high-risk population. CONCLUSION: Incorporating self-administered patient-risk stratification tools in primary care settings can identify high-risk individuals for targeted melanoma screening. Further studies are needed to optimize specificity and sensitivity in more targeted populations.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Melanoma , Primary Health Care , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment/methods , Female , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Computers, Handheld
14.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 226, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787442

ABSTRACT

The inclusion of participants from underrepresented and underserved groups is lagging in dermatology clinical trials. Through dissemination of a pilot survey at a community skin health fair, knowledge, participation, and perspectives of clinical trials were evaluated in an urban, medically underserved community in Washington, DC. Clinical trial-related questions were derived from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 Cycle 4. This cross-sectional survey analyzed responses from 39/55 attendees (71% response rate). Most respondents were female (23/37 [62.2%]), between the ages of 25 and 54 (19/38, [50.0%]), and self-identified as non-white (35/39 [89.7%]) with a majority self-identifying as Black (16/31 [41%]). Most respondents self-reported knowing "little" to "nothing" about clinical trials (26/35 [74.3%]), and even more were unaware of the federal resource clinicaltrials.gov (30/37 [81.1%]). Few respondents discussed clinical trials as a treatment option with their healthcare provider (8/35 [22.9%]), yet having a discussion was significantly correlated with clinical trial participation (p = 0.0302). Self-reported level of knowledge was not significantly associated with participation in a clinical trial (p = 0.3035). Healthcare providers were the preferred first source of clinical trial information, followed by an internet search. Respondents rarely cited mistrust or skepticism as a barrier to participation (2/34 [5.9%]). Subjective positive healthcare experiences were significantly correlated to positive expectations with clinical trial participation (p = 0.0242). The findings of this study suggest the essential role healthcare providers, including dermatologists, play in clinical trial education and recruitment of underrepresented populations, and that patient mistrust may be present but is a rarely cited barrier to clinical trial participation.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , District of Columbia , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Medically Underserved Area , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/psychology , Patient Selection , Young Adult
15.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 246, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795141

ABSTRACT

Philanthropic donations are an increasingly important funding source for academic medical centers. Minimal published data is available about factors that influence alumni donations to residency programs. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a single-site dermatology and combined internal medicine-dermatology residency programs to assess factors impacting alumni donations. Donors tended to have graduated less recently (only 20% graduating after 2010) and practice in the same region of their alma mater (50%). Respondents preferred funds be allocated to resident needs over needs of medical students. Strategically engaging senior alumni and offering fund allocation opportunities could increase philanthropy, with alumni perceptions of the residency program warranting further investigation for their impact on donation decisions.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Internship and Residency , Humans , Dermatology/education , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Internal Medicine/education , Internal Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data
17.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 239, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795232

ABSTRACT

Studies examining the real-world treatment satisfaction in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) and the physicians who treat adults with AD are scarce. We sought to characterize treatment satisfaction of adults with AD and physicians' perceived patient satisfaction with AD treatment. We performed a cross-sectional study of adults > = 18 years of age (modified AD UK Working Party Criteria, age onset < = 18 [N = 767]) with AD and a parallel-physician survey among allergists/immunologists [N = 148], dermatologists [N = 149] and primary care medicine [N = 104]. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with patient treatment satisfaction (PTS) or physician-perceived patient treatment satisfaction (pPTS). Factors associated with increased PTS included female, older age, and receiving a written eczema action plan (EAP). Severe AD, itch, pain, and insomnia, greater impact on partner relationships, feeling not adequately informed about AD causes, and being separated, never married, or living with a partner was associated with less PTS. From the physician's perspective, mild AD and development of EAP was associated with increase pPTS, whereas being in practice longer was associated with less pPTS. Limitations include the potential for misclassification of AD and the inability to match AD patients to individual physicians. Recognizing which factors are associated with treatment satisfaction can help inform counseling and decision-making strategies, including the use of an eczema action plan, and support patient-physician outcomes alignment.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/psychology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Adult , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Dermatologists/statistics & numerical data , Dermatologists/psychology , Severity of Illness Index
18.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 283, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796551

ABSTRACT

Although there are now two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for severe alopecia areata (AA), many patients still resort to non-medical therapies and lifestyle modifications such as diet and nutrition. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sources and types of dietary and nutritional advice for patients with AA. We distributed a cross-sectional national survey using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's email list-serv between August 2022 and January 2023. Most respondents were White (76.3%), employed (58.3%) females (84.4%) with a mean age of 52 years. 163 (19.1%) respondents reported receiving diet and/or nutritional advice and 418 (49.5%) respondents reported searching for diet and/or nutritional advice to help with their AA; the most common source of advice was online. The most common dietary changes were the use of vitamins or supplements (30.6%), adherence to diets (23.2%), and the addition of specific foods (21.4%). 209 (50.2%) respondents reported no change in their disease and 197 (47.4%) respondents reported no change in how they felt about their disease compared to before they tried the change. Many AA patients search for or receive unsolicited dietary and nutritional advice and subsequently modify their behavior to manage their disease. However, the efficacy of these changes is unclear. Providers should be mindful of the sources through which patients obtain treatment information as well as the lifestyle changes patients make to counsel patients with evidence-based information. Further investigation is needed to better characterize the direct and indirect costs of dietary and nutritional modification in the treatment of AA.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Alopecia Areata/diet therapy , Alopecia Areata/therapy , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Aged , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Patient Education as Topic , United States
19.
J Surg Res ; 299: 34-42, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701702

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As our growing population demonstrates a significant increase in the incidence of thyroid cancer, so does patient access to their medical records. Poor health literacy and understanding of disease severity, underscores the importance of effective and accessible patient-doctor communication. No previous studies on patient understanding of thyroid pathology reports exist; therefore, we sought to characterize health literacy in this population. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi technique, a 12-question multiple-choice survey regarding common pathology terms with possible definitions for each term was synthesized and administered to patients in a high-volume endocrine surgery clinic. Survey results, patient demographics, history of prior thyroid procedure (biopsy or surgery), and self-reported health literacy were collected. Data analysis included t tests, chi-squared, and multivariable linear regression using R. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 54 patients (response rate: 69.8%). On univariate analysis, White race, previous thyroid procedure, and at least a high school level education were all more likely to score higher on the survey than their counterparts (P < 0.05). On multivariable logistic regression for predicting a higher survey score, only race (est: 2.48 [95% confidence interval: 1.01-3.96]) and higher educational attainment (est: 3.98 [95% confidence interval: 2.32-5.64]) remained predictive (P < 0.05). The remaining demographic groups (age, health literacy confidence, and previous thyroid procedure) did not show a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, terms on a thyroid pathology report are poorly understood by patients. This is exacerbated by non-White race and low educational attainment. There is a need for patient-facing pathology education.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Humans , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Delphi Technique , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroid Diseases/pathology , Thyroid Diseases/surgery
20.
J Surg Res ; 299: 76-84, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718687

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medical careers increase infertility risks and pregnancy complications. Residents often postpone pregnancy, contributing to these risks. Limited data exist regarding residents' family planning concerns. This study aims to evaluate fertility concerns and family planning during residency via a survey of residents and attending physicians. METHODS: Anonymous online surveys were distributed to all residents (n = 1030) and attending physicians (n = 1111) at a large, urban, single-campus academic hospital center. Data analysis was performed using chi-square analysis with significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Two hundred nine residents and 111 attendings submitted responses. Most respondents were female (74.7%). Slightly more than one-quarter of respondents were from a surgical specialty (26.6%). Residents compared to attending physicians indicated a higher concern for infertility during (57.4% versus 38.3%, P = 0.006) and after residency (68.9% versus 51.9%, P = 0.011) and a greater concern about pregnancy complications (67.8% versus 38.0%, P < 0.001). Most respondents felt pregnancy could negatively affect their training (67.3%). Surgical respondents were more concerned about the negative effects on colleagues (68.8% versus 51.1%, P = 0.045). Residents considered oocyte preservation more (57.9% versus 20.3%, P < 0.001). Respondents in surgical specialties had more concerns for fertility after residency (72.6% versus 57.9%, P = 0.033). Those in surgical fields trended for consideration of oocyte preservation (53.4% versus 39.7%, P = 0.084). Most respondents reported a need for education on oocyte preservation during residency (94.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Residents have increasing concerns about fertility and family planning related to their training. In addition to more institutional and residency program support, residents desire dedicated fertility and family planning education, such as oocyte preservation, as part of their curriculum.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Attitude of Health Personnel , Infertility/therapy , Family Planning Services/statistics & numerical data , Fertility
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...