Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 269
Filter
1.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 320, 2024 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133350

ABSTRACT

Robotic surgery has been increasingly adopted in various surgical fields, but the cost-effectiveness of this technology remains controversial due to its high cost and limited improvements in clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore the health economic implications of robotic pancreatic surgery, to investigate its impact on hospitalization costs and consumption of various medical resources. Data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at our institution were collected and divided into robotic and traditional groups. Statistical analyses of hospitalization costs, length of stay, costs across different service categories, and subgroup cost analyses based on age, BMI class, and procedure received were performed using t tests and linear regression. Although the total hospitalization cost for the robotic group was significantly higher than that for the traditional group, there was a notable reduction in the cost of medical consumables. The reduction was more prominent among elderly patients, obese patients, and those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, which could be attributed to the technological advantages of the robotic surgery platform that largely facilitate blood control, tissue protection, and suturing. The study concluded that despite higher overall costs, robotic pancreatic surgery offers significant savings in medical consumables, particularly benefiting certain patient subgroups. The findings provide valuable insights into the economic viability of robotic surgery, supporting its adoption from a health economics perspective.


Subject(s)
Pancreatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Tertiary Care Centers , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , China , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Aged , Pancreatectomy/economics , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/economics , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Pancreas/surgery , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Med Life ; 17(5): 471-477, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144686

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on health systems worldwide, and Romania was no exception. The impact on healthcare expenses for pregnant women was considerable, especially in COVID-19-only tertiary centers. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare costs in a designated COVID-19 maternity ward. We conducted an observational study comparing pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 (study group) to those without the infection (control group). Patients were recruited at Bucur Maternity Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022. We evaluated expenses for the entire period of hospitalization, treatment, medical supplies, and medical investigations. The study included 600 pregnant women, divided equally into two groups of 300 each. Significant cost differences were observed between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups: medication costs (664.56 EUR vs. 39.49 EUR), administrative costs (191.79 EUR vs. 30.28 EUR), and medical investigation costs (191.15 EUR vs. 29.42 EUR). The costs for a severe case of COVID-19 were about two times higher than a mild case and 70 times higher than a non-COVID-19 case (P <0.001). We identified a significant cost increase due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in our unit. The expenses were augmented by the time of hospitalization, medication, and medical investigations. COVID-19 had a significant impact on healthcare costs, mostly among pregnant women with severe disease. The strategy of operating exclusively as a COVID-19 unit proved to be inefficient and highly costly to our hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Care Costs , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Female , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Adult , Romania/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Maternity/economics , Cost of Illness , Hospitalization/economics , Pandemics/economics
3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 864, 2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026195

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because the proportion of elderly individuals and the incidence of cancer worldwide are continually increasing, medical costs for elderly inpatients with cancer are being significantly increasing, which puts tremendous financial pressure on their families and society. The current study described the actual direct medical costs of elderly inpatients with cancer and analyzed the influencing factors for the costs to provide advice on the prevention and control of the high medical costs of elderly patients with cancer. METHOD: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on the hospitalization expense data of 11,399 elderly inpatients with cancer at a tier-3 hospital in Dalian between June 2016 and June 2020. The differences between different groups were analyzed using univariate analysis, and the influencing factors of hospitalization expenses were explored by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The hospitalization cost of elderly cancer patients showed a decreasing trend from 2016 to 2020. Specifically, the top 3 hospitalization costs were material costs, drug costs and surgery costs, which accounted for greater than 10% of all cancers according to the classification: colorectal (23.96%), lung (21.74%), breast (12.34%) and stomach cancer (12.07%). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that cancer type, surgery, year and length of stay (LOS) had a common impact on the four types of hospitalization costs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the four types of hospitalization costs for elderly cancer patients according to the LOS, surgery, year and type of cancer. The study results suggest that the health administration department should enhance the supervision of hospital costs and elderly cancer patient treatment. Measures should be taken by relying on the hospital information system to strengthen the cost management of cancer diseases and departments, optimize the internal management system, shorten elderly cancer patients LOS, and reasonably control the costs of disease diagnosis, treatment and department operation to effectively reduce the economic burden of elderly cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Neoplasms , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Female , Male , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , China/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Aged, 80 and over , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data
4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 48: 9, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946741

ABSTRACT

Introduction: treatment of severe burn injury generally requires enormous human and material resources including specialized intensive care, staged surgery, and continued restoration. This contributes to the enormous burden on patients and their families. The cost of burn treatment is influenced by many factors including the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient. This study aimed to determine the costs of burn care and its associated predictive factors in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Methods: an analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 65 consenting adult patients on admission at the Burns Centre of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients as well as the direct cost of burns treatment were obtained. Multiple regression analysis was done to determine the predictors of the direct cost of burn care. Results: a total of sixty-five (65) participants were enrolled in the study with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4: 1 and a mean age of 35.9 ± 14.6 years. Nearly 85% sustained between 10-30% total body surface area burns whilst only 6.2% (4) had burns more than 30% of total body surface area. The mean total cost of burns treatment was GHS 22,333.15 (USD 3,897.58). Surgical treatment, wound dressing and medication charges accounted for 45.6%, 27.5% and 9.8% of the total cost of burn respectively. Conclusion: the direct costs of burn treatment were substantially high and were predicted by the percentage of total body surface area burn and length of hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Burns , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Ghana , Cross-Sectional Studies , Burns/economics , Burns/therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Young Adult , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Adolescent , Burn Units/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Aged , Cost of Illness , Regression Analysis
5.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e081594, 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39079725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the economic efficiency of the acute medical unit (AMU) hospitalist care model, utilising patient outcomes (length of hospital stay, emergency department (ED)-length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality) from a previous investigation. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using benefit-cost analysis from a societal perspective. Data relating to clinical factors, outcomes and medical costs were obtained from the electronic medical record database at our institution. Literature-based costing was applied to determine direct non-medical costs and indirect costs that could not be obtained directly. SETTING: A tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea. PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the ED from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017. INTERVENTIONS: The study compared multiple types of costs and benefits among inpatients from the ED between a non-hospitalist group and an AMU hospitalist group. Results This investigation found a significant reduction in medical costs and total costs in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (30% reduction, 95% CI: 27.6-32.1%, P=0.000; 29.3% reduction, 95% CI: 27.0-31.5%, P=0.000; respectively). Furthermore, significant reductions in direct and indirect costs were found in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (28.6% reduction, 95% CI: 26.6-30.5%, P=0.000; 23.3% reduction, 95% CI: 20.9-25.5%, P=0.000; respectively). The net-benefit and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of the AMU hospitalist care group were US $6846 and 1.33 per patient admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AMU hospitalist care model was associated with remarkable reductions in multiple costs. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the net-benefit estimates of AMU hospitalist care were similar to the baseline estimates. Thus, the overall net-benefit of AMU hospitalist care was found to be largely positive.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalists , Length of Stay , Humans , Hospitalists/economics , Retrospective Studies , Republic of Korea , Male , Female , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adult
6.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 65(6)2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833683

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a clinically effective palliation procedure for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. LVRS has recently been commissioned by the NHS England. In this study, a costing model was developed to analyse cost and resource implications of different LVRS procedures. METHODS: Three pathways were defined by their surgical procedures: bronchoscopic endobronchial valve insertion (EBV-LVRS), video-assisted thoracic surgery LVRS and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery LVRS. The costing model considered use of hospital resources from the LVRS decision until 90 days after hospital admission. The model was calibrated with data obtained from an observational study, electronic health records and expert opinion. Unit costs were obtained from the hospital finance department and reported in 2021 Euros. RESULTS: Video-assisted thoracic surgery LVRS was associated with the lowest cost at €12 896 per patient. This compares to the costs of EBV-LVRS at €15 598 per patient and €13 305 per patient for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery LVRS. A large component of EBV-LVRS costs were accrued secondary to complications, including revision EBV-LVRS. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a comprehensive model framework for the analysis of hospital-related resource use and costs for the 3 surgical modalities. In the future, service commissioning agencies, hospital management and clinicians can use this framework to determine their modifiable resource use (composition of surgical teams, use of staff and consumables, planned length of stay and revision rates for EBV-LVRS) and to assess the potential cost implications of changes in these parameters.


Subject(s)
Pneumonectomy , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Pneumonectomy/economics , Pneumonectomy/methods , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/economics , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/economics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/surgery , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , England , Male , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Bronchoscopy/economics , Bronchoscopy/methods , Bronchoscopy/statistics & numerical data
7.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1229722, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721544

ABSTRACT

Following the marketization of China's health system in the 1980's, the government allowed public hospitals to markup the price of certain medications by 15% to compensate for reduced revenue from government subsidies. This incentivized clinicians to induce patient demand for drugs which resulted in higher patient out-of-pocket payments, higher overall medical expenditure, and poor health outcomes. In 2009, China introduced the Zero Markup Drug Policy (ZMDP) which eliminated the 15% markup. Using Shanghai as a case study, this paper analyzes emerging and existing evidence about the impact of ZMDP on hospital expenditure and revenue across secondary and tertiary public hospitals. We use data from 150 public hospitals across Shanghai to examine changes in hospital expenditure and revenue for various health services following the implementation of ZMDP. Our analysis suggests that, across both secondary and tertiary hospitals, the implementation of ZMDP reduced expenditure on drugs but increased expenditure on medical services, exams, and tests thereby increasing hospital revenue and keeping inpatient and outpatient costs unchanged. Moreover, our analysis suggests that tertiary facilities increased their revenue at a faster rate than secondary facilities, likely due to their ability to prescribe more advanced and, therefore, more costly procedures. While rigorous experimental designs are needed to confirm these findings, it appears that ZMDP has not reduced instances of medical expenditure provoked by provider-induced demand (PID) but rather shifted the effect of PID from one revenue source to another with differential effects in secondary vs. tertiary hospitals. Supplemental policies are likely needed to address PID and reduce patient costs.


Subject(s)
Tertiary Care Centers , China , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Drug Costs
8.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4): 832-835, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751295

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic burden of acute stroke, and to determine the average cost of acute stroke care for a single hospital stay in a public tertiary care hospital. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Medical Teaching Institute, Bacha Khan Medical Complex, Swabi, Pakistan, from May 16 to September 19, 2022, and comprised patients of either gender who were hospitalised with an acute stroke for the first time. All costs incurred during the care of the patients were measured using the micro-costing methodology, and the association of the cost with other variables was evaluated. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients, 24(70.6%) were males and 10(29.4%) were females. The overall mean age was 66+/-13.00 years. The mean length of hospital stay was 4+/-3.00 days. The mean total cost was 18,156+/-9,068 Pakistani rupees, which was the equivalent of 76.89+/-38.4 United States dollars. The cost of the first day of admission was the highest, declining per day as the stay progressed, and imaging/laboratory investigations formed the highest component of the overall cost (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The cost of acute stroke care was found to be high even in a public hospital. The length of hospital stay was the most important determinant of the overall cost.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay , Stroke , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Female , Pakistan , Male , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/economics , Stroke/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data
9.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 27(5): e15198, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769913

ABSTRACT

AIM: An inaugural set of consensus guidelines for malignancy screening in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) were recently published by an international working group. These guidelines propose different investigation strategies based on "high", "intermediate" or "standard" malignancy risk groups. This study compares current malignancy screening practices at an Australian tertiary referral center with the recommendations outlined in these guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed IIM patients. Relevant demographic and clinical data regarding malignancy screening were recorded. Existing practice was compared with the guidelines using descriptive statistics; costs were calculated using the Australian Medicare Benefit Schedule. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients identified (66% female, median age: 63 years [IQR: 55.5-70], median disease duration: 4 years [IQR: 3-6]), only one had a screening-detected malignancy. Twenty patients (43%) were at high risk, while 20 (43%) were at intermediate risk; the remaining seven (15%) had IBM, for which the proposed guidelines do not recommend screening. Only three (6%) patients underwent screening fully compatible with International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies recommendations. The majority (N = 39, 83%) were under-screened; the remaining five (11%) overscreened patients had IBM. The main reason for guideline non-compliance was the lack of repeated annual screening in the 3 years post-diagnosis for high-risk individuals (0% compliance). The mean cost of screening was substantially lower than those projected by following the guidelines ($481.52 [SD 423.53] vs $1341 [SD 935.67] per patient), with the highest disparity observed in high-risk female patients ($2314.29/patient). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the proposed guidelines will significantly impact clinical practice and result in a potentially substantial additional economic burden.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Guideline Adherence , Myositis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Middle Aged , Male , Guideline Adherence/economics , Myositis/economics , Myositis/diagnosis , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Risk Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Health Care Costs
10.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 24(5): 687-695, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection using directly acting antivirals was recently adopted in the treatment guidelines of Zimbabwe. The objectives of this study were to design a simplified model of HCV care and estimate the cost of screening and treatment of hepatitis C infection at a tertiary hospital in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We developed a model of care for HCV using WHO 2018 guidelines for the treatment of HCV infection and expert opinion. We then performed a micro-costing to estimate the costs of implementing the model of care from the healthcare sector perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the impact of uncertainty in input parameters on the estimated total cost of care. RESULTS: The total cost of screening and treatment was estimated to be US$2448 (SD=$290) per patient over a 12-week treatment duration using sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. The cost of directly acting antivirals contributed 57.5% to the total cost of care. The second largest cost driver was the cost of diagnosis, US$819, contributing 34.6% to the total cost of care. CONCLUSION: Screening and treatment of HCV-infected individuals using directly acting antivirals at a tertiary hospital in Zimbabwe may require substantial financial resources.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Health Care Costs , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Mass Screening , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Zimbabwe , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Antiviral Agents/economics , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/economics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Costs and Cost Analysis , Models, Economic
11.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(5): 1725-1735, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer burden in Asia is increasing, and Vietnam is no exception. Assessing the affordability of achieving a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in gastrointestinal cancer patients Vietnam, as well as identifying predictors of willingness to pay (WTP) per QALY, is crucial to decision-making around medical intervention prioritization and performing medical technology assessments for these cancers. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to estimate WTP/QALY gained and associated factors among patients diagnosed with GI cancer at a tertiary hospital in Hue, Vietnam. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study, using contingent valuation methodology was conducted among 231 patients at tertiary hospital in 2022. A double limited dichotomous choice and the EQ-5D-5L were utilised to estimate WTP and QALY, respectively. Quantile regression was applied to determine predictors of WTP/QALY. RESULTS: The mean and median maximum WTP/QALY gained among GI patients was $15,165.6 (42,239.6) and $4,365.6 (IQR: 1,586.5-14,552.0), respectively, which was equal to 3.68 times the 2022 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Vietnam.  Additionally, cancer severity was found to have a significant impact  on WTP per QALY gained, with a higher amount identified among patients with earlier stages of GI cancer. Furthermore, living in an urban dwelling and patients' treatment modalities were significantly associated with WTP/QALY. CONCLUSION: Evidence from our study can be used to inform how decision-makers in Vietnam to determine the cost-effectiveness of GI cancer interventions.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/economics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/psychology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vietnam , Middle Aged , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies , Quality of Life , Adult
12.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 27(4): e15153, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661316

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the direct health service costs and resource utilization associated with diagnosing and characterizing idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), and to assess for limitations and diagnostic delay in current practice. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center cohort analysis of all patients diagnosed with IIMs between January 2012 and December 2021 in a large tertiary public hospital was conducted. Demographics, resource utilization and costs associated with diagnosing IIM and characterizing disease manifestations were identified using the hospital's electronic medical record and Health Intelligence Unit, and the Medicare Benefits Schedule. RESULTS: Thirty-eight IIM patients were identified. IIM subtypes included dermatomyositis (34.2%), inclusion body myositis (18.4%), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (18.4%), polymyositis (15.8%), and anti-synthetase syndrome (13.2%). The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 212 days (IQR: 118-722), while the median time from hospital presentation to diagnosis was 30 days (8-120). Seventy-six percent of patients required emergent hospitalization during their diagnosis, with a median length of stay of 8 days (4-15). The average total cost of diagnosing IIM was $15 618 AUD (STD: 11331) per patient. Fifty percent of patients underwent both MRI and EMG to identify affected muscles, 10% underwent both pan-CT and PET-CT for malignancy detection, and 5% underwent both open surgical and percutaneous muscle biopsies. Autoimmune serology was unnecessarily repeated in 37% of patients. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of IIMs requires substantial and costly resource use; however, our study has identified potential limitations in current practice and highlighted the need for streamlined diagnostic algorithms to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare-related economic burden.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Public , Myositis , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Myositis/diagnosis , Myositis/economics , Myositis/therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Aged , Adult , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Care Costs , Delayed Diagnosis/economics , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Australia
13.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 630-635, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582671

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the direct costs of OSCC treatment and postsurgical surveillance in a tertiary hospital in northeast Italy. Sixty-three consecutive patients surgically treated for primitive OSCC at S. Orsola Hospital in Bologna (Italy) between January 2018 and January 2020 were analyzed. Billing records of the Emilia Romagna healthcare system and institutional costs were used to derive specific costs for the following clinical categories: operating theatre costs, intensive and ordinary hospitalization, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, postsurgical complications, visits, and examinations during the follow-up period. The study population comprised 17 OSCC patients classified at stage I, 14 at stage II, eight at stage III, and 24 at stage IV. The estimated mean total direct cost for OSCC treatment and postsurgical surveillance was €26 338.48 per patient (stage I: €10 733, stage II: €19 642.9, stage III: €30 361.4, stage IV: €39 957.2). An advanced diagnosis (stages III and IV), complex surgical procedure, and loco-regional recurrences resulted in variables that were significantly associated with a higher cost of OSCC treatment and postsurgical surveillance. Redirection of funds used for OSCC treatment to screening measures may be an effective strategy to improve overall health outcomes and optimize national health resources.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Mouth Neoplasms , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Mouth Neoplasms/economics , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Middle Aged , Aged , Italy , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Staging , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/economics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy
14.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 42: 100984, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the direct cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) used during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of a Brazilian tertiary public hospital. METHODS: We evaluated the cost of PPE during the pandemic to the cost before (2021 vs 2019, respectively) using the microcosting method. Cost estimates were converted into US dollars in 2023, taking inflation into account and using purchasing power parity conversion rates. Our expenses included gloves, disposable gowns, head coverings, masks, N95 respirators, and eye protection. The number of PPE used was determined by the hospital's usual protocol, the total number of hospitalized patients, and the number of days of hospitalization. We used the following variables for uncertainty analysis: PPE adherence, an interquartile range of median length of hospitalization, and variance in the cost of each PPE. RESULTS: In 2021, 26 618 individuals were hospitalized compared with 31 948 in 2019. The median length of stay was 6 and 4 days, respectively. The total and per-patient direct cost of PPE were projected to be 2 939 935.47 US dollar (USD) and 110.45 USD, respectively, during the pandemic, and 1 570 124.08 USD and 49.15 USD, respectively, before the pandemic. The individual cost of PPE was the most influential cost variable. CONCLUSIONS: According to the hospital's perspective, the total estimated direct cost of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic was nearly twice as high as the previous year. This difference might be explained by the 3-fold increase in PPE in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 compared with patients without isolation precautions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Personal Protective Equipment , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/economics , Personal Protective Equipment/economics , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/economics , Pandemics/prevention & control , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
15.
Am Surg ; 90(8): 2127-2129, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561960

ABSTRACT

The operating room has been identified as one of the primary contributors to waste and energy expenditure in the health care system. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of single-use device reprocessing and report the cost savings, waste diversion, and reduction in carbon emissions. Data was collected from January 2021 to April 2023. Medline collected the data for analysis and converted it from an Excel file format to SPSS (Version 27) for analysis. Descriptive frequencies were used for data analysis. We found a mean monthly cost savings of $16,051.68 and a mean 700.68 pounds of waste a month diverted, resulting in an estimated yearly saving of $2354.29 in disposal costs and a reduction of 1112.65 CO2e emissions per month. This program has made significant contributions to cost savings and environmental efforts.


Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Equipment Reuse , Operating Rooms , Tertiary Care Centers , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Equipment Reuse/economics , Humans , Operating Rooms/economics , Disposable Equipment/economics , Surgery Department, Hospital/economics
16.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 51(3): 168-173, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the financial resources allocated to docusate at a representative U.S. tertiary care center. Secondary objectives included comparing docusate utilization between two tertiary care centers, and exploring alternative uses for the funds spent on docusate. METHODS: The study population included all patients 18 years and older admitted to University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey. Every scheduled docusate prescription for the study population between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2019 was collected. The annual total cost associated with docusate use per year was calculated. The 2015 data from this study and a 2015 McGill University Health Centre study were compared. Also, alternative uses for the money utilized on docusate were assessed. RESULTS: Over the study period, 37,034 docusate prescriptions and 265,123 docusate doses were recorded. The average cost of prescribing docusate was $25,624.14 per year and $49.37 per hospital bed per year. A comparison between the 2015 data of University Hospital and McGill showed that McGill prescribed 107 doses and spent $10.09 more per hospital bed than University Hospital. Finally, alternative uses for the average yearly spending on docusate equated to 0.35 the salary of a nurse, 0.51 the salary of a secretary, 20.66 colonoscopies, 27.00 upper endoscopies, 186.71 mammograms, 1,399.37 doses of polyethylene glycol 3350, 3,826.57 doses of lactulose, or 4,583.80 doses of psyllium. CONCLUSION: A single average size tertiary care hospital spent about $25,000 yearly on docusate despite its lack of clinical effectiveness. While this amount is small compared to an overall hospital budget, when considering likely comparable docusate use at the U.S's 6,090 hospitals, the economic burden of docusate becomes significant. The funds currently being used on docusate could be redirected to alternative, more cost-effective purposes.


Subject(s)
Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid , Drug Costs , Drug Prescriptions , Laxatives , Tertiary Care Centers , Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid/economics , United States , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Humans , Laxatives/economics , Constipation/drug therapy
17.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e057468, 2022 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980632

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of an active 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance mechanism at a referral teaching hospital in Ghana using data from healthcare-associated infection Ghana (HAI-Ghana) study. DESIGN: Before and during intervention study using economic evaluation model to assess the cost-effectiveness of an active 30-day SSI surveillance at a teaching hospital. The intervention involves daily inspection of surgical wound area for 30-day postsurgery with quarterly feedback provided to surgeons. Discharged patients were followed up by phone call on postoperative days 3, 15 and 30 using a recommended surgical wound healing postdischarge questionnaire. SETTING: Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: All prospective patients who underwent surgical procedures at the general surgical unit of the KBTH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the avoidable SSI morbidity risk and the associated costs from patient and provider perspectives. We also reported three indicators of SSI severity, that is, length of hospital stay (LOS), number of outpatient visits and laboratory tests. The analysis was performed in STATA V.14 and Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Before-intervention SSI risk was 13.9% (62/446) as opposed to during-intervention 8.4% (49/582), equivalent to a risk difference of 5.5% (95% CI 5.3 to 5.9). SSI mortality risk decreased by 33.3% during the intervention while SSI-attributable LOS decreased by 32.6%. Furthermore, the mean SSI-attributable patient direct and indirect medical cost declined by 12.1% during intervention while the hospital costs reduced by 19.1%. The intervention led to an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$4196 savings per SSI episode avoided. At a national scale, this could be equivalent to a US$60 162 248 cost advantage annually. CONCLUSION: The intervention is a simple, cost-effective, sustainable and adaptable strategy that may interest policymakers and health institutions interested in reducing SSI.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Surgical Wound Infection , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Ghana/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
18.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 157(4): 561-565, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617986

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A CBC with WBC differential is often ordered when a CBC alone would be sufficient for patient care. Performing unnecessary WBC differentials adds to costs in the laboratory. Our objective was to implement a laboratory middleware algorithm to cancel repeat, same-day WBC differentials to achieve lasting improvements in laboratory resource allocation. METHODS: Repeat same-day WBC differentials were first canceled only on intensive care unit samples; after a successful trial period, the algorithm was applied hospital-wide. We retrospectively reviewed CBC with differential orders from pre- and postimplementation periods to estimate the reduction in WBC differentials and potential cost savings. RESULTS: The algorithm led to a monthly WBC differential cancellation rate of 5.40% for a total of 10,195 canceled WBC differentials during the cumulative postimplementation period (September 25, 2019, to December 31, 2020). Nearly all (99.94%) differentials remained canceled. Most patients only had one WBC differential canceled (range, 1-38). Savings estimates showed savings of $0.99 CAD per canceled differential and 1,060 minutes (17.7 hours) of technologist time. CONCLUSIONS: A middleware algorithm to cancel repeat, same-day WBC differentials is a simple and sustainable way to achieve lasting improvements in laboratory utilization.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Laboratories , Cost Savings , Humans , Intensive Care Units/economics , Laboratories/economics , Leukocyte Count/economics , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/economics
19.
S Afr Med J ; 111(5): 482-486, 2021 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: South Africa has a high burden of traumatic injuries that is predominantly managed in the public healthcare system, despite the relative disparity in human resources between the public and private sectors. Because of budget and theatre time constraints, the trauma waiting list often exceeds 50 - 60 patients who need urgent and emergent surgery in high-volume orthopaedic trauma centres. This situation is exacerbated by other surgical disciplines using orthopaedic theatre time for life-threatening injuries because of lack of own theatre availability. One of the proposed solutions to this problem is outsourcing of some of the cases to private medical facilities. OBJECTIVES: To establish the volume of work done by an orthopaedic registrar during a 3-month trauma rotation, and to calculate the implant and theatre costs, as well as compare the salary of a registrar with the theoretical private surgeon fees for procedures performed by the registrar in the 3-month period. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the surgical logbook of a single registrar during a 3-month rotation, from 14 January to 14 April 2019, was reviewed. Surgeon fees were calculated for these procedures, according to current medical aid rates, without additional modifier codes being added. RESULTS: During the 3-month study period, a total of 157 surgical procedures was performed, ranging from total hip arthroplasty to debridement of septic hands. Surgeon fees amounted to ZAR186 565.10 per month ‒ double the gross salary of a registrar. Total implant costs amounted to ZAR1 272 667. Theatre costs were ZAR1 301 976 for the 3-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Although this analysis was conducted over a short period, it highlights the significant amount of trauma work done by a single individual at a high-volume tertiary orthopaedic trauma unit. With increasing budget constraints, pressure on theatre time and a growing population, cost-effective expansion of resources is needed. From this study, it appears that increasing capacity in the state sector could be cheaper than private outsourcing, although a more in-depth analysis needs to be conducted.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Surgeons/economics , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital/economics , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Retrospective Studies , South Africa , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Trauma Centers/economics , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Young Adult
20.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260127, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843530

ABSTRACT

Sepsis, an important and preventable cause of death in the newborn, is associated with high out of pocket hospitalization costs for the parents/guardians. The government of Nepal's Free Newborn Care (FNC) service that covers hospitalization costs has set a maximum limit of Nepalese rupees (NPR) 8000 i.e. USD 73.5, the basis of which is unclear. We aimed to estimate the costs of treatment in neonates and young infants fulfilling clinical criteria for sepsis, defined as clinical severe infection (CSI) to identify determinants of increased cost. This study assessed costs for treatment of 206 infants 3-59 days old, enrolled in a clinical trial, and admitted to the Kanti Children's Hospital in Nepal through June 2017 to December 2018. Total costs were derived as the sum of direct costs for bed charges, investigations, and medicines and indirect costs calculated by using work time loss of parents. We estimated treatment costs for CSI, the proportion exceeding NPR 8000 and performed multivariable linear regression to identify determinants of high cost. Of the 206 infants, 138 (67%) were neonates (3-28 days). The median (IQR) direct costs for treatment of CSI in neonates and young infants (29-59 days) were USD 111.7 (69.8-155.5) and 65.17 (43.4-98.5) respectively. The direct costs exceeded NPR 8000 (USD 73.5) in 69% of neonates with CSI. Age <29 days, moderate malnutrition, presence of any sign of critical illness and documented treatment failure were found to be important determinants of high costs for treatment of CSI. According to this study, the average treatment cost for a newborn with CSI in a public tertiary level hospital is substantial. The maximum limit offered for free newborn care in public hospitals needs to be revised for better acceptance and successful implementation of the FNC service to avert catastrophic health expenditures in developing countries like Nepal. Trial Registration: CTRI/2017/02/007966 (Registered on: 27/02/2017).


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Government , Health Care Costs/trends , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/trends , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospitals, Public/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Nepal , Sepsis/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL