ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) remains the most significant challenge among hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), yet still unresolved. The present study aims to evaluate the preventive effectiveness of JUC Spray Dressing (name of U.S. FDA and CE certifications, while the medical device name in China is Long-acting Antimicrobial Material) alone for CAUTI without combining with antibiotics and to evaluate the impact of bacterial biofilm formation on CAUTI results on the inserted catheters of patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, we enrolled adults who suffered from acute urinary retention (AUR) and required catheterization in 6 hospitals in China. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 according to a random number table to receive JUC Spray Dressing (JUC group) or normal saline (placebo group). The catheters were pretreated with JUC Spray Dressing or normal saline respectively before catheterization. Urine samples and catheter samples were collected after catheterization by trial staff for further investigation. RESULTS: From April 2012 to April 2020, we enrolled 264 patients and randomly assigned them to the JUC group (n = 132) and the placebo group (n = 132). Clinical symptoms and urine bacterial cultures showed the incidence of CAUTI of the JUC group was significantly lower than the placebo group (P < 0.01). In addition, another 30 patients were enrolled to evaluate the biofilm formation on catheters after catheter insertion in the patients' urethra (10 groups, 3 each). The results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that bacterial biofilm formed on the 5th day in the placebo group, while no bacterial biofilm formed on the 5th day in the JUC group. In addition, no adverse reactions were reported using JUC Spray Dressing. CONCLUSION: Continued indwelling urinary catheters for 5 days resulted in bacterial biofilm formation, and pretreatment of urethral catheters with JUC Spray Dressing can prevent bacterial biofilm formation by forming a physical antimicrobial film, and significantly reduce the incidence of CAUTI. This is the first report of a study on inhibiting bacterial biofilm formation on the catheters in CAUTI patients.
Subject(s)
Biofilms , Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Biofilms/growth & development , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged , Adult , China , Bandages , Cross Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
AIMS: Intermittent catheters (ICs) are commonly used in bladder management, but catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) remain challenging. Insertion tips may reduce the risk of CAUTIs by minimizing bacterial transfer along the urinary tract. However, there are few laboratory tests to evaluate such technologies. We describe the use of an adapted in vitro urethra agar model to assess bacterial displacement by ICs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Simulated urethra agar channels (UACs) were prepared with catheter-specific sized channels in selective media specific to the challenge organisms. UACs were inoculated with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis before insertion of ICs, and enumeration of UAC sections was performed following insertion. Four ICs were evaluated: Cure Catheter® Closed System (CCS), VaPro Plus Pocket™, Bard® Touchless® Plus, and SpeediCath® Flex Set. CCS demonstrated significantly reduced bacterial displacement along the UACs compared to the other ICs and was also the only IC with undetectable levels of bacteria toward the end of the UAC (representing the proximal urethra). CONCLUSION: The bacterial displacement test demonstrated significant differences in bacterial transfer between the test ICs with insertion tips, which may reflect their different designs. This method is useful for evaluating CAUTI prevention technology and may help guide future technology innovations.
Subject(s)
Enterococcus faecalis , Escherichia coli , Urinary Tract Infections , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urethra/microbiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. METHODS: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Device Removal , Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Time Factors , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Length of Stay , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are the most common secondary cause of bloodstream infection. CAUTI is particularly prevalent in critical care departments and developing countries, where the duration of catheterization remains the most significant risk factor. This study focused on the characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of CAUTI patients in a tertiary care hospital setting. It also provides the incidence rate of CAUTI in an ICU setting in Palestine. The study adopted a retrospective observational design at a tertiary care hospital in Palestine. The data were collected from patient records as well as from nursing flow charts. Variables are reported as frequencies, percentages and means + standard deviations. Independent t-tests was used for numerical variables, while Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for confounders using binary logistic regression. Mortality risk factors were assessed using the proportional Cox regression model. Of the 377 patients included in the study, 33 (9%) developed CAUTI. Among CAUTI patients, 75% had Candida species isolated, with non-albicans Candida predominating (72%) fungal isolates. On the other hand, 25% of the patients had bacterial isolates in their urine, with a predominance of Escherichia coli growing in 36% of bacterial cultures. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that female gender, longer catheterization days, and corticosteroid use were associated with an increased risk of CAUTI. On the other hand, developing CAUTI, having a malignant disease, developing kidney injury, and developing shock were associated with increased mortality. This study highlighted the emerging presence of fungal and resistant bacterial CAUTI. It also emphasized that the risk of CAUTI was associated with a longer duration of urinary catheterization. The findings of this study may help formulate antimicrobial management and stewardship plans as well as emphasize the risk of urinary catheterizations.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Critical Care , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Middle Aged , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Middle East/epidemiology , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both long (> 30 days) and short-term (≤ 30 days) catheterisation has been associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to the invasive nature of device insertion through the urethra. Catheter associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs) are common (prevalence of ~ 8.5%) infections which can be treated with antibiotics; however, CAUTIs are both expensive to treat and contributes to the antibiotic usage crisis. As catheters are unlikely be replaced for the management of patients' urination, ways of reducing CAUTIs are sought out, using the catheter device itself. The aim of this review is to assess the incidence of CAUTI and the causative micro-organisms when different urinary catheter devices have been used by humans, as reported in published research articles. METHODS: A Systematic Literature Review was conducted in Ovid Medline, Web of Science and PubMed, to identify studies which investigated the incidence of UTI and the causative micro-organisms, in patients with different urinary catheter devices. The articles were selected based on a strict set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data regarding UTI incidence was extracted and calculated odds ratio were compared across studies and pooled when types of catheters were compared. CAUTI causative micro-organisms, if stated within the research pieces, were also gathered. RESULTS: A total of 890 articles were identified, but only 26 unique articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review. Amongst the large cohort there were catheters of materials silicone, latex and PVC and catheter modifications of silver nanoparticles and nitrofurantoin antibiotics. The meta-analysis did not provide a clear choice towards a single catheter against another although silver-based catheters, and silver alloy, appeared to statistically reduce the OR of developing CAUTIs. At genus level the three commonest bacteria identified across the cohort were E. coli, Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. whilst considering only at the genus level, with E. coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Enterococcus faecalis most common at the species-specific level. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be a catheter type, which can significantly reduce the incidence of CAUTI's in patients requiring catheterisation. Ultimately, this warrants further research to identify and develop a catheter device material that will reduce the incidence for CAUTIs.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Incidence , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: About 50% of individuals with long-term indwelling catheters are affected by catheter encrustations and bladder stone formation. Therefore, prophylaxis of catheter encrustations is important. Currently, however, neither an established prophylaxis nor a standardized in-vitro model to test different measures exist. We have therefore developed and qualitatively evaluated an in-vitro model of catheter encrustation. METHODS: Size 14 French suprapubic catheters were incubated under sterile conditions at 37 degrees Celsius in five different media: (1) sterile artificial urine (n = 16), (2) artificial urine with E. coli (n = 8), (3) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8), (4) with Proteus mirabilis (n = 8), and (5) with a mix of these three strains (n = 8). Catheter balloons were inflated either a glycerine or a bactericidal solution. After 6 weeks, the catheters were removed from the solution, dried, and weighed, and a photometric determination of the retrieved encrustations was performed. RESULTS: Most frequently and pronounced encrustations were detected in the Pseudomonas group. The median weight of these encrustations (50% struvite and brushite) was 84.4 mg (47.7 mg / 127.3 mg). Even on catheters stored in sterile urine, encrustations (69.2% struvite) were found. Bacterial growth was not affected by the medium used for catheter blockage. CONCLUSION: Although in-vitro models appear to be limited because they lack "the human factor", they are valuable for systematically assessing physico-chemical factors affecting encrustations. Therefore, our model, being reliable and cost-effective, may foster further research despite its limitations.
Subject(s)
Urinary Catheters , Humans , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Proteus mirabilis/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , In Vitro Techniques , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Models, BiologicalABSTRACT
Prolonged retention of urinary catheters (UC) after vaginal surgery is a common practice aimed at preventing postoperative urinary retention and enhancing the success rate of surgery. However, this approach also increases the chance of urinary tract infection (UTI), prolongs hospital stay (LOS), and delays recovery. Balancing these considerations, we investigated the effect of the timing of UC removal. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using four databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who underwent transvaginal surgery and had UC removal within 7 days postsurgery. This systematic review was conducted by two reviewers independently following the PRISMA guideline. This study investigated the timing of catheter removal in relation to the incidence of urinary retention, UTI, and LOS. A total of 8 RCT studies, involving 952 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Six studies revealed no significant difference in the urinary retention rate between early catheter removal group (24 h) and delayed removal group (>48 h, P = 0.21), but exhibited a significantly reduced UTI rate (P < 0.001) in 4 studies. In 2 studies, no significant difference in urinary retention rate between the earlier removal (3 h) and removal at 24 h (P = 0.09), and also UTI rate (P = 0.57). Overall, 5 studies revealed that early catheter removal significantly shortened the LOS by an average of 1-3 days (P ≤ 0.001). Early removal of UC can considerably reduce the rate of UTI and shorten the LOS. Moreover, it has potential benefits in terms of improving the quality of patient care and reducing medical costs.
Subject(s)
Device Removal , Postoperative Complications , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Retention , Urinary Tract Infections , Vagina , Female , Humans , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Vagina/surgerySubject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Evidence-Based Nursing , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychologyABSTRACT
Intermittent catheterization (IC) utilizing conventional eyelets catheters (CECs) for bladder drainage has long been the standard of care. However, when the tissue of the lower urinary tract comes in close proximity to the eyelets, mucosal suction often occurs, resulting in microtrauma. This study investigates the impact of replacing conventional eyelets with a drainage zone featuring multiple micro-holes, distributing pressure over a larger area. Lower pressures limit the suction of surrounding tissue into these micro-holes, significantly reducing tissue microtrauma. Using an ex vivo model replicating the intra-abdominal pressure conditions of the bladder, the intra-catheter pressure was measured during drainage. When mucosal suction occurred, intra-catheter images were recorded. Subsequently affected tissue samples were investigated histologically. The negative pressure peaks caused by mucosal suction were found to be very high for the CECs, leading to exfoliation of the bladder urothelium and breakage of the urothelial barrier. However, a micro-hole zone catheter (MHZC) with a multi-eyelet drainage zone showed significantly lower pressure peaks, with over 4 times lower peak intensity, thus inducing far less extensive microtraumas. Limiting or even eliminating mucosal suction and resulting tissue microtrauma may contribute to safer catheterizations in vivo and increased patient comfort and compliance.
Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Animals , Humans , Pressure , Mucous Membrane/injuries , Swine , Urinary Tract , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization , Suction , Urothelium , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Indwelling urinary catheter is closely associated with the occurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Herein, we further explored the correlation of urinary catheter indwelling time and UTI. METHODS: Retrospectively, the medical data of nosocomial patients (n = 681) were collected during two quarters of April 2023 to June 2023 (the second quarter, 23.4-23.6, n = 330) and July 2023 to September 2023 (the third quarter, 23.7-23.9, n = 351). The baseline data and incidence of catheter-related UTI were analysed. The total hospitalisation days and indwelling urinary catheter days of patients in five departments were assessed, namely, coronary care unit (CCU), respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), surgical intensive care unit (SICU), neurology intensive care unit (NICU) and cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) departments. The correlation between hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days and the occurrence of UTI was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: In the CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU departments, the number of patients was 463, 83, 29, 91 and 15, respectively. During 23.4-23.6, the incidence of catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) was 0, 2.85, 6.12, 0 and 12.99 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. During 23.7-23.9, the incidence of CAUTI was 2.98, 6.13, 8.66, 0 and 0 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. Notably, hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days were positively correlated with the occurrence of CAUTI in each quarter (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive correlation between urinary catheter indwelling time and the occurrence of UTI.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheters, Indwelling , Cross Infection , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Time Factors , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Aged , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Incidence , Correlation of DataSubject(s)
Ileal Diseases , Intestinal Fistula , Urinary Bladder Fistula , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Female , Humans , Male , Urinary Bladder Fistula/etiology , Urinary Bladder Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Intestinal Fistula/etiology , Ileal Diseases/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cesarean deliveries (CD) are commonly performed using neuraxial anesthesia. The use of neuraxial morphine has proven beneficial in terms of postoperative pain management; however, its effect on postoperative urine retention remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether morphine injection into the neuraxis during CD influences postoperative urinary retention rate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control observational study of patients undergoing CD. We compared patients using morphine injected into the intrathecal or epidural spaces (November 2020 to October 2021) to a historical cohort of patients undergoing CD without morphine (November 2019 to October 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative overt urinary retention necessitating bladder catheterization. RESULTS: The study group comprised 283 patients, and 313 patients in the control group were eligible for analysis. No differences were found with respect to the baseline demographic and indication for CD. The number of postpartum urinary bladder catheterizations due to urine retention was higher in the study group (5% vs. 1%, P-value = 0.003). No cases of 30-day readmission were recorded. Moreover, patients treated with neuraxial morphine required fewer repeat doses of postoperative anesthesia (oral analgesia 7.4 vs. 10.1, intravenous analgesia 0.29 vs. 0.31, oral opioids 0.06 vs. 3.70, intravenous opioids 0.01 vs. 0.45, P-value < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: While neuraxial morphine used during CD appears to be safe and effective, the risk of postoperative urinary retention seems to be increased due to its use. Cases of overt urinary retention treated by bladder catheterization does not lead to short-term complications.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Cesarean Section , Morphine , Pain, Postoperative , Urinary Retention , Humans , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Female , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/methods , Pregnancy , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Injections, Spinal , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bladder drainage is systematically used in rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal type of drainage, transurethral catheterization (TUC) or suprapubic catheterization (SPC), is still controversial. The aim was to compare the rates of urinary tract infection on the fourth postoperative day (POD4) between TUC and SPC, after rectal cancer surgery regardless of the day of removal of the urinary drain. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial in 19 expert colorectal surgery centers in France and Belgium was performed between October 2016 and October 2019 and included 240 men (with normal or subnormal voiding function) undergoing mesorectal excision with low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Patients were followed at postoperative days 4, 30, and 180. RESULTS: In 208 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 58-71]) randomized to TUC (n = 99) or SPC (n = 109), the rate of urinary infection at POD4 was not significantly different whatever the type of drainage (11/99 (11.1%) vs. 8/109 (7.3%), 95% CI, - 4.2% to 11.7%; p = 0.35). There was significantly more pyuria in the TUC group (79/99 (79.0%) vs. (60/109 (60.9%), 95% CI, 5.7-30.0%; p = 0.004). No difference in bacteriuria was observed between the groups. Patients in the TUC group had a shorter duration of catheterization (median 4 [2-5] vs. 4 [3-5] days; p = 0.002). Drainage complications were more frequent in the SPC group at all followup visits. CONCLUSIONS: TUC should be preferred over SPC in male patients undergoing surgery for mid and/or lower rectal cancers, owing to the lower rate of complications and shorter duration of catheterization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02922647.
Subject(s)
Drainage , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Male , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder/surgery , BelgiumABSTRACT
AIMS: Skin breakdown is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). This pilot evaluation aimed to determine whether a nurse-constructed urinary catheter securement device using a silicone adhesive could reduce the complications of blistering and other skin breakdowns in a high-risk ICU population with Foley catheters. DESIGN: A prospective, non-randomised performance improvement study using a convenience sample was carried out. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study sample consisted of 29 patients with urethral Foley catheters and any degree of thigh oedema in a surgical ICU at an academic quarternary medical center. METHODS: Patients were fitted with a standard acrylic-adhesive catheter securement device on one thigh and a nurse-constructed device on the contralateral thigh. At the beginning of each 12-hour shift, the nurse moved the Foley catheter from one securement device to the other; the nurse recorded the assessment findings at the end of the shift. RESULTS: The average age of the 29 patients was 61±16 (range 20-87) years. Visible skin compromise occurred in 21% of the time with the standard acrylic securement device; an equal percentage of men and women developed skin breakdown. Oedema status was a significant factor related to skin breakdown. There was no visible damage to the skin associated with the nurse-constructed silicone-adhesive device. CONCLUSIONS: A silicone adhesive urinary catheter securement device causes less skin damage than one with acrylic adhesive. One-step application, pain-free and atraumatic removal, and reliable securement are essential considerations in product development.
Subject(s)
Adhesives , Silicones , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Prospective Studies , Urinary Catheterization/nursing , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Adhesives/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Indwelling urinary catheters often lead to complications such as symptomatic urinary tract infections. In nursing home residents, catheter prevalence is high, but prevalence differences by sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and health services use have rarely been investigated. The purpose of this work was to describe the use of indwelling urinary catheters in nursing home residents and to examine whether catheter use is associated with individual characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional data of the "Inappropriate Medication in patients with REnal insufficiency in Nursing homes" (IMREN) study conducted in 21 German nursing homes between October 2014 and April 2015 were analyzed. For all residents of the involved care units, nurses of the participating institutions completed an anonymous questionnaire including the Modified Rankin Scale to assess physical impairments. The proportion of nursing home residents with indwelling urinary catheter was determined. Associations between catheter use and individual characteristics were investigated via cluster-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 852 residents (76.5% female; mean age 83.5 years), 13.4% had an indwelling urinary catheter. The adjusted odds ratios for catheter use for men vs. women was 2.86 (95% confidence interval 1.82-4.50). For residents with "moderate" disability vs. those with "no to slight" disability it was 3.27 (1.36-7.85), for individuals with "moderately severe" disability vs. the reference group it was 9.03 (3.40-23.97), and for those with "severe" disability vs. the reference group it was 26.73 (8.60-83.14). For residents who had been hospitalized within the last 12 months vs. those without a hospitalization it was 1.97 (1.01-3.87). For age, dementia, overweight/obesity, other indwelling devices, and long-term medications no significant associations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Male nursing home residents, residents with a higher degree of physical impairment, and those who had been hospitalized within the last 12 months were more likely to use an indwelling urinary catheter than their counterparts. Data on circumstances of and indications for catheters, catheter types, and duration of catheterization are needed to evaluate the appropriateness of catheter use in nursing home residents and the need for interventions.
Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Nursing Homes , Urinary Catheters , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Aged , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Background: The incidence of catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is relatively high in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent renal transplantation (RT). This study was designed to establish a nomogram for predicting CRBD after RT among ESRD patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected 269 ESRD patients who underwent RT between September 2019 and August 2023 in our hospital. The patients were divided into training set (n = 215) and test set (n = 54) based on a ratio of 8:2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify the risk factors associated with CRBD after RT, and then a nomogram model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predicting efficiency of the established nomogram. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aberrant body mass index (BMI) (underweight: OR = 5.25; 95% CI [1.25-22.15], P = 0.024; overweight: OR = 2.75; 95% CI [1.17-6.49], P = 0.021), anuria (OR = 2.86; 95% CI [1.33-5.88]) and application of double J (DJ) stent with a diameter of >5Fr (OR = 15.88; 95% CI [6.47-39.01], P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CRBD after RT. In contrast, sufentanil utilization (>100 µg) [OR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.17-0.88], P = 0.023] was associated with decreased incidence of CRBD. A nomogram was then established based on these parameters for predicting the occurrence of CRBD after RT. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) values and calibration curves confirmed the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. Conclusion: A nomogram was established for predicting CRBD after RT in ESRD patients, which showed good prediction efficiency based on AUC and calibration curves.
Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Nomograms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Adult , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , ROC Curve , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Logistic Models , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Catheterization is a common treatment for postpartum urinary retention (PUR); however, its application before diagnosis of PUR remains unclear. The aim was to give an overview of the existing literature on the effectiveness and safety of intrapartum or postpartum catheterization in the prevention of PUR. METHODS: This scoping review followed a methodological framework. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database were searched from the inception of each database to 21 May 2023. RESULTS: The search revealed 16 studies examining three different catheterization methodologies, including 12 intrapartum studies. Ten studies concluded that intrapartum or postpartum catheterization prevented PUR, two of which were only for overt or covert PUR. In 4 out of 13 experimental studies, no significant difference was found: one for intrapartum catheterization versus routine nursing, the other for intrapartum or postpartum intermittent versus indwelling catheterization. However, one found that postpartum disposable catheterization after ineffective targeted care reduced the incidence of PUR compared with indwelling catheterization. One out of the 3 case-control studies concluded that prenatal catheterization ≥2 times was a risk factor for PUR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings in this scoping review, catheterization prior to the diagnosis of PUR appears to play a role in preventing PUR and is safe. Preliminary evidence is accumulating on the effectiveness of three types of catheterization methods in preventing PUR, but more comprehensive studies are needed to establish these findings.
Subject(s)
Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Retention , Humans , Female , Urinary Retention/prevention & control , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/therapy , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Puerperal Disorders/prevention & control , Puerperal Disorders/etiology , Postpartum PeriodABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most common healthcare associated infection. A significant knowledge gap exists regarding the necessity of catheter replacement as part of CAUTI treatment. Current guidelines recommend replacement for faster recovery and to prevent recurrences, but adherence is low. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the available evidence regarding catheter replacement for CAUTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible studies investigated the effect of catheter replacement in CAUTI on clinical outcomes and/or recurrence rates, irrespective of catheter type or setting. We searched electronic literature databases from inception to October 15th, 2023. Information was extracted regarding setting, eligibility criteria, definition of CAUTI, timing of replacement, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 257 identified studies, four were considered relevant and included. Two were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and two were observational studies. One RCT showed higher rates of clinical recovery and lower recurrence rates in the replacement group, while results of the other RCT favoured retainment, with a lower recurrence rate in the retainment group, although longer antimicrobial treatment in this group. Two observational studies were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines rely heavily on recommendations from a single study, emphasizing the need for further research. The burden of catheter replacement, including patient discomfort and resource impact, warrants careful consideration. A randomized trial is essential to provide more evidence on the effect of catheter replacement on clinical outcomes including CAUTI recurrence.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Device Removal , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prolonged indwelling catheter use is a known risk factor for catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs). We sought to reduce catheter use by creating and implementing a trial of void (TOV) algorithm to standardize indwelling Foley catheter removal in surgical patients. METHODS: We partnered with the Departments of General Surgery and Nursing to develop an evidence-based TOV algorithm for a step-down unit at a large urban teaching hospital. Our cohort included patients treated with intra-abdominal, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. The primary outcome was mean cumulative indwelling urethral catheter patient-days. For example, if 2 patients had catheters for 3 and 7 days, respectively, then cumulative catheter days would be 10. We analyzed changes in catheter use 90 days before and after algorithm implementation. RESULTS: The mean number of hospitalized patient-days before and after algorithm introduction did not differ (32.2 vs 32.0, P = .60). After implementation, mean cumulative catheter patient-days decreased (14.8 vs 9.9, P < .01), as did mean daily number of patients with catheters on the unit (3.7 vs 3.1, P = .02). There was 1 CAUTI before and after algorithm implementation, the latter deemed associated with algorithm nonadherence. Catheter use in a surgical floor control group where the algorithm was not implemented did not differ for any outcome over the same time period (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach to standardize catheter care with a TOV algorithm is feasible and effective in reducing catheter use. Further research is needed to determine its impact on CAUTI rate.