ABSTRACT
Purpose: To define the temporal relationship of vascular versus neuronal abnormalities in radiation retinopathy. Methods: Twenty-five patients with uveal melanoma treated with brachytherapy and sixteen controls were tested. Functional outcome measures included visual acuity and threshold perimetry (HVF 10-2), while structural outcomes included retinal thickness by OCT and vascular measures by OCT angiography and digital fundus photography. The degree of structural abnormality was determined by intereye asymmetry compared with normal subject asymmetry. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each measure were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. The relationships between the outcome measures were quantified by Spearman correlation. The effect of time from brachytherapy on visual function, retinal layer thickness, and capillary density was also determined. Results: Within the first 2 years of brachytherapy, outcome measures revealed visual field loss and microvascular abnormalities in 38% and 31% of subjects, respectively. After 2 years, they became more prevalent, increasing to 67% and 67%, respectively, as did retinal thinning (50%). Visual field loss, loss of capillary density, and inner retinal thickness were highly correlated with one another. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were highest for abnormalities in digital fundus photography, visual field loss within the central 10°, and decrease in vessel density. Conclusions: Using quantitative approaches, radiation microvasculopathy and visual field defects were detected earlier than loss of inner retinal structure after brachytherapy. Strong correlations eventually developed between vascular pathology, change in retinal thickness, neuronal dysfunction, and radiation dose. Radiation-induced ischemia seems to be a primary early manifestation of radiation retinopathy preceding visual loss.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Iodine Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Retinal Diseases/etiology , Retinal Vessels/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Visual Fields/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/physiopathology , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Retinal Diseases/physiopathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Disorders/etiology , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visual Acuity/radiation effects , Visual Field Tests , Visual Fields/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Uveal melanoma is a distinct subtype of melanoma characterized by a unique biology and divergent response to immune therapies. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of the pathophysiology of uveal melanoma, systemic treatment options for advanced disease, and potential future therapeutic directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Although treatment with single-agent checkpoint blockade has been generally disappointing, the results of combined checkpoint blockade are modestly more promising. Several alternative systemic therapeutic approaches have been or are currently being investigated, including two agents that have been taken into registration-intent clinical trials: tebentafusp, a T cell redirecting agent, and IDE196, an oral protein kinase C inhibitor. Treatment of advanced uveal melanoma remains challenging, however, encouraging results from novel agents offer hope for improvement in the near future.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/drug therapy , Uveal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/physiopathology , Melanoma/therapy , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. UMs are usually initiated by a mutation in GNAQ or GNA11, unlike cutaneous melanomas, which usually harbour a BRAF or NRAS mutation. The annual incidence in Europe and the USA is ~6 per million population per year. Risk factors include fair skin, light-coloured eyes, congenital ocular melanocytosis, ocular melanocytoma and the BAP1-tumour predisposition syndrome. Ocular treatment aims at preserving the eye and useful vision and, if possible, preventing metastases. Enucleation has largely been superseded by various forms of radiotherapy, phototherapy and local tumour resection, often administered in combination. Ocular outcomes are best with small tumours not extending close to the optic disc and/or fovea. Almost 50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which usually involves the liver, and is usually fatal within 1 year. Although UM metastases are less responsive than cutaneous melanoma to chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors, encouraging results have been reported with partial hepatectomy for solitary metastases, with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan or with tebentafusp. Better insight into tumour immunology and metabolism may lead to new treatments.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Neoplasm Metastasis/physiopathology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Slit Lamp Microscopy/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Ocular proton therapy is an effective therapeutic option for patients affected with uveal melanomas. An optical eye-tracking system (ETS) aiming at noninvasive motion monitoring was developed and tested in a clinical scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ETS estimates eye position and orientation at 25 frames per second using the three-dimensional position of pupil and cornea curvature centers identified, in the treatment room, through stereoscopic optical imaging and infrared eye illumination. Its capabilities for automatic detection of eye motion were retrospectively evaluated on 60 treatment fractions. Then, the ETS performance was benchmarked against the clinical standard based on visual control and manual beam interruption. RESULTS: Eye-tracking system detected eye position successfully in 97% of all available frames. Eye-tracking system-based eye monitoring during therapy guarantees quicker response to involuntary eye motions than manual beam interruptions and avoids unnecessary beam interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: Eye-tracking system shows promise for on-line monitoring of eye motion. Its introduction in the clinical workflow will guarantee a swifter treatment course for the patient and the clinical personnel.
Subject(s)
Eye-Tracking Technology , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Movement , Proton Therapy , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Automation , Benchmarking , Humans , Melanoma/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of age on radiation complications after plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab for uveal melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of plaque-irradiated uveal melanoma with prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab at 4-month intervals from July 2000 to January 2018. RESULTS: Of 1131 eyes in 1131 patients, age was <50 years (nâ=â231), 50 to 70 years (nâ=â657), or >70 years (nâ=â243). Comparison by age category (<50 vs 50-70 vs >70 years) revealed the oldest group presenting with greatest tumor basal diameter (11.3 vs 11.3 vs 12.1âmm, Pâ=â0.03) and worst visual acuity (20/40 vs 20/40 vs 20/50, Pâ=â0.02). After plaque (mean follow-up 40 vs 42 vs 32 months, Pâ<â0.001), radiation complications were most common in the youngest age group, including maculopathy (48% vs 39% vs 28%, Pâ<â0.001), extramacular retinopathy (30% vs 25% vs 16%, Pâ=â0.002), and papillopathy (21% vs 18% vs 12%, Pâ=â0.03). The youngest age group had the highest Kaplan-Meier estimated 48-month cumulative probability for radiation maculopathy (62% vs 46% vs 47%, Pâ=â0.001), extramacular retinopathy (36% vs 34% vs 29%, Pâ=â0.03), and papillopathy (29% vs 26% vs 22%, Pâ=â0.13). On subanalysis, the youngest age group had increased 48-month risk of developing radiation maculopathy when compared with the middle [hazard ratio (HR)â=â1.5, Pâ=â0.001] and older (HRâ=â1.6, Pâ=â0.005) age groups and increased 48-month risk of developing extramacular radiation retinopathy compared with the older age group (HRâ=â1.5, Pâ=â0.04). CONCLUSIONS: After plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab at 4-month intervals, patients younger than 50 years old have an increased 48-month risk of radiation maculopathy.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Retinal Diseases/prevention & control , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Visual Acuity/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Macular Edema/physiopathology , Macular Edema/prevention & control , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Radiation Injuries/physiopathology , Retinal Diseases/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Uveal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular primary malignancy in adults and has been considered a fatal disease for decades. Optogenetics is an emerging technique that can control the activation of signaling components via irradiation with visible light. The clinical translation of optogenetics has been limited because of the need for surgical implantation of electrodes and relatively shallow tissue penetration. As visible light easily penetrates the eyes, we hypothesized that an optogenetics approach can be an effective treatment of uveal melanoma without surgery. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of this strategy by using a genetically encoded optogenetic system based on reversible blue light-induced binding pairs between Fas-CIB1-EGFP and CRY2-mCherry-FADD. Subretinal injection of B16 cells was performed to create a uveal melanoma model. Plasmids pairs were co-transfected into B16 cells. We found that blue light irradiation dynamically controlled the translocation of FADD to Fas on the plasma membrane and induced the apoptosis of B16 cells transfected with the optogenetic nanosystem in vitro. Moreover, the blue light-controlled optogenetic nanosystem suppressed the growth of uveal melanoma in vivo by inducing apoptosis. These results suggest that light-controlled optogenetic therapy can be used as a potential novel therapeutic strategy for uveal melanoma.
Subject(s)
Apoptosis , Genetic Therapy/methods , Light , Melanoma/therapy , Optogenetics/methods , Uveal Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Melanoma/metabolism , Melanoma/physiopathology , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Mice , Signal Transduction , Uveal Neoplasms/metabolism , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
Importance: Radiation retinopathy following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma can lead to vision loss that might be avoided with prophylactic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Objective: To determine visual outcome following prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with plaque-irradiated uveal melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional cohort study at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Prophylactic bevacizumab was administered between 2008 and 2018 to 1131 eyes with irradiated uveal melanoma (bevacizumab group) and compared with 117 eyes with irradiated uveal melanoma between 2007 and 2009 (no bevacizumab [historical control] group). Interventions: Prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab was provided at the time of plaque removal as well as 6 subsequent injections at 4-month intervals over 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity. Results: The median patient age was 61 years, 1195 of 1248 patients were white (96%), and 632 of 1248 were women (51%). The median tumor thickness was 4.0 mm, and median distance to foveola was 3.0 mm. A difference was not identified (bevacizumab vs control group) in demographic features, clinical features, or radiation parameters. The mean follow-up was 40 months vs 56 months (mean difference, -18; 95% CI, -24 to -13; P < .001). By survival analysis, the bevacizumab group demonstrated less optical coherence tomography evidence of cystoid macular edema at 24 months (28% vs 37%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .02) and 36 months (44% vs 54%; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = .01), less clinical evidence of radiation maculopathy at 24 months (27% vs 36%; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2; P = .03), 36 months (44% vs 55%; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0; P = .01), and 48 months (61% vs 66%; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9; P = .03), and less clinical evidence of radiation papillopathy at 18 months (6% vs 12%; HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .04). Nonparametric analysis documented better visual acuity outcomes in the bevacizumab group at all points, including 12 months (median logMAR visual acuity [Snellen equivalent]: 0.30 [20/40] vs 0.48 [20/60]; mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.07; P = .02), 24 months (0.40 [20/50] vs 0.70 [20/100]; mean difference, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.29; P < .001), 36 months (0.48 [20/60] vs 1.00 [20/200]; mean difference, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.21; P = .003), and 48 months (0.54 [20/70] vs 2.00 [counting fingers]; mean difference, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.38; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings from a retrospective cohort of plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with uveal melanoma suggest better visual outcomes when compared with nonrandomized historical control individuals through 4 years.
Subject(s)
Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Visual Acuity , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Uveal Neoplasms/mortality , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/analysis , Visual Acuity/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma reports a positive family history. Inherited variants in CDKN2A and several other genes have been shown to predispose to melanoma; however, the genetic basis of familial melanoma remains unknown in most cases. The objective of this study was to provide insight into the genetic basis of familial melanoma. METHODS: In order to identify novel melanoma susceptibility genes, whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis was applied in a Dutch family with melanoma. The causality of a candidate variant was characterised by performing cosegregation analysis in five affected family members using patient-derived tissues and digital droplet PCR analysis to accurately quantify mutant allele frequency. Functional in-vitro studies were performed to assess the pathogenicity of the candidate variant. RESULTS: Application of WES identified a rare, nonsense variant in the NEK11 gene (c.1120C>T, p.Arg374Ter), cosegregating in all five affected members of a Dutch family. NEK11 (NIMA-related Kinase 11) is involved in the DNA damage response, enforcing the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. In a melanoma from a variant carrier, somatic loss of the wildtype allele of this putative tumour suppressor gene was demonstrated. Functional analyses showed that the NEK11 p.Arg374Ter mutation results in strongly reduced expression of the truncated protein caused by proteasomal degradation. CONCLUSION: The NEK11 p.Arg374Ter variant identified in this family leads to loss-of-function through protein instability. Collectively, these findings support NEK11 as a melanoma susceptibility gene.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Melanoma/genetics , NIMA-Related Kinases/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Mutation , Pedigree , Penetrance , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
Yes-associated protein (YAP) and its homolog transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) are key effectors of the Hippo pathway to control cell growth and organ size, of which dysregulation yields to tumorigenesis or hypertrophy. Upon activation, YAP/TAZ translocate into the nucleus and bind to TEAD transcription factors to promote transcriptional programs for proliferation or cell specification. Immediate early genes, represented by AP-1 complex, are rapidly induced and control later-phase transcriptional program to play key roles in tumorigenesis and organ maintenance. Here, we report that YAP/TAZ directly promote FOS transcription that in turn contributes to the biological function of YAP/TAZ. YAP/TAZ bind to the promoter region of FOS to stimulate its transcription. Deletion of YAP/TAZ blocks the induction of immediate early genes in response to mitogenic stimuli. FOS induction contributes to expression of YAP/TAZ downstream target genes. Genetic deletion or chemical inhibition of AP-1 suppresses growth of YAP-driven cancer cells, such as Lats1/2-deficient cancer cells as well as Gαq/11 mutated uveal melanoma. Furthermore, AP-1 inhibition almost completely abrogates the hepatomegaly induced by YAP overexpression. Our findings reveal a feed-forward interplay between immediate early transcription of AP-1 and Hippo pathway function.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription Factor AP-1/genetics , Transcription Factor AP-1/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Gene Deletion , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Genes, fos/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Liver/metabolism , Melanoma/physiopathology , Mice , Mitogens/pharmacology , Organ Size/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif Proteins , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , YAP-Signaling ProteinsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess quality of life (QoL) status via the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer as a psychooncological screening tool in uveal melanoma patients. METHODS: One hundred and six consecutive patients suffering from uveal melanoma completed the distress thermometer between 04/2018 and 12/2018. Practical, emotional, family concerned, spiritual, physical and overall distress levels, distribution of distress and subgroup analyses defining groups of potential high distress levels in need of intervention were assessed. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, chi-square and Fisher's exact test as well as correlation coefficients (Spearman's rho) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used for analysis. RESULTS: Patients with higher T-category had significantly more emotional problems and spiritual concerns (p = 0.046 and p = 0.023, respectively). Female patients accounted for higher rates of physical issues (p = 0.034). Lower best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was correlated with higher distress levels (p = 0.037). Patients resulting in loss of BCVA of ≥3 lines reported higher distress levels (p = 0.029). A distress threshold of 5 on the basis of ROC analysis showed a corresponding sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSION: The NCCN distress thermometer could be integrated well into our clinical routine and proved to be a rapid, yet sensible screening tool for emotional and physical distress in patients with uveal melanoma. Special attention should be paid to patients with higher T-category and patients resulting in lower levels of BCVA. As in patients with different tumour entities, the established distress threshold of ≥5 proposing intervention proved to be adequate for uveal melanoma patients.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/psychology , Psychological Distress , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Uveal Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathologyABSTRACT
The currently used anti-cancer therapies work by killing cancer cells but result in adverse effects and resistance to treatment, which accelerates aging and causes damage to normal somatic cells. On one hand, chicken and zebrafish embryos can reprogram cancer cells towards a non-tumorigenic phenotype; however, they cannot be used in the clinical practice. On the other hand, embryonic stem cells (ESCs) mimic the early embryonic microenvironment and are easily available. We investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the ESC microenvironment (ESCMe) in human uveal melanoma in vitro and in vivo. Methods: Human uveal melanoma C918 cells co-cultured with ESCs were used to measure the levels of mRNA and protein of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Cell proliferation, invasiveness, and tumorigenicity of C918 cells were also analyzed. To mimic the tumor microenvironment in vivo, we co-cultured C918 cells and normal somatic cells with ESCs in a co-culture system and evaluated the therapeutic potential of ESCMe in both cell types. For an in vivo study, a mouse tumor model was used to test the safety and efficacy of the transplanted ESC. Elimination of the transplanted ESCs in mice was carried out by using the ESC-transfected with a thymidine kinase suicidal gene followed by administration of ganciclovir to prevent the formation of teratomas by ESCs. Results: In vitro studies confirmed that ESCMe inhibits the proliferation, invasiveness, and tumorigenicity of C918 cells, and the PI3K agonist abolished these effects. ESCMe suppressed the various malignant behaviors of uveal melanoma cells but enhanced the proliferation of normal somatic cells both in vitro and in vivo. Further, we demonstrated that ESCMe suppressed the PI3K pathway in tumor cells but activated in somatic cells. Conclusions: The ESCMe can effectively suppress the malignant phenotype of uveal melanoma cells and modulate the tumor-promoting aging environment by preventing the senescence of normal cells through the bidirectional regulation of the PI3K signaling. Our results suggest that ESC transplantation can serve as an effective and safe approach for treating cancer without killing cells.
Subject(s)
Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Melanoma/physiopathology , Tumor Microenvironment , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most frequent primary intraocular tumor, however, limited therapeutic options are still available. We have previously shown that cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47) is significantly upregulated in UM cells following inflammatory stimuli and that it represents a predictor of disease progression. Here, we aimed to better characterize the pathophysiological role of CD47 in UM. We show that CD47 is not modulated at different cancer stages, although patients with the lowest expression of CD47 show significant better progression-free survival, after correcting for the presence of BAP1, GNAQ, and GNA11 mutations. By stratifying patients based on the expression of CD47 in the tumor, we observed that patients with high levels of CD47 have a significant increase in immune score as compared to patients with low levels of CD47. In particular, deconvolution analysis of infiltrating immune cell populations revealed that a significantly higher number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells can be found in patients with high CD47 levels, with the most enriched populations being the Th2, Treg, and CD8+ Tcm cells. We also show that a large number of transcripts are significantly modulated between the groups of patients with high and low levels of CD47, with a significant enrichment of interferon IFN-alpha regulated genes. The results from this study may propel the development of anti-CD47 therapies for UM patients.
Subject(s)
CD3 Complex/metabolism , Melanoma/metabolism , Melanoma/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/metabolism , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Ligands , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/immunology , Transcriptome/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment , Up-Regulation/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Uveal melanomas affect 2-8 per million Europeans each year. Approximately 35%, are treated by enucleation. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) can be an eye-conserving alternative to enucleation for patients who wish to retain the eye. Both treatments have adverse effects, and it is difficult for clinicians and patients to make fully informed choices between them because the relative effects of enucleation and PBR on patient-reported outcomes are unknown. METHODS: We compared differential effects of enucleation and PBR on patient-reported outcomes on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ophthalmological module (EORTC QLQ- OPT30) in a consecutive sample of 115 treated patients ~ 6, 12 and 24 months after diagnosis. Pre-treatment demographic variables, unrelated health problems, vision in the fellow eye, tumour characteristics and prognosis for metastatic disease were statistically controlled. RESULTS: Patients treated by enucleation experienced greater functional problems at 6 months, which abated at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.020). PBR patients reported greater impairments of central and peripheral vision (P = 0.009) and reading difficulties (P = 0.002) over 24 months. Treatment modality did not influence difficulty in driving (P = 0.694), ocular irritation (P = 0.281), headaches (P = 0.640), appearance concerns (P = 0.187) or worry about recurrence (P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS: When making treatment decisions, it is important that patients and clinicians consider long-standing difficulties of visual impairment associated with PBR and temporary 6-month difficulties in activities related to depth perception associated with enucleation.
Subject(s)
Eye Enucleation , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Melanoma/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Proton Therapy , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Uveal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Depth Perception/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the retina dose as a risk factor associated with loss of visual acuity (VA) in 106Ru plaque brachytherapy. MATERIAL/METHODS: 45 patients receiving 106Ru plaques brachytherapy (median follow-up 29.5â¯months) were included in this study. An in-house developed treatment planning system with Monte Carlo based dose calculation was used to perform treatment planning and dose calculation. Risk factors associated with loss of VA were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier estimates and Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between VA loss and mean (râ¯=â¯0.49, pâ¯=â¯0.001) and near maximum (râ¯=â¯0.47, pâ¯=â¯0.001) retina dose D2% and tumor basal diameter (râ¯=â¯0.50, pâ¯<â¯0.001). The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model yielded a significantly higher risk for VA loss (>0.3Snellen) for patients receiving a maximum dose of >500â¯Gy (pâ¯=â¯0.002). A Cox multivariate analysis including the macula dose (pâ¯=â¯0.237) and basal diameter (pâ¯=â¯0.791) showed that a high maximum retinal dose is the best risk factor (pâ¯=â¯0.013) for VA loss. CONCLUSION: The study showed that retina dose (D2% and Dmean) is a suitable predictor for VA loss.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Retina/radiation effects , Ruthenium Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Melanoma/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Monte Carlo Method , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiation Dosage , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retinal Diseases/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ruthenium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/radiation effectsABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Primary bilateral uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare and incompletely described entity. It is not known how these patients compare to those with unilateral UM. BACKGROUND: We sought to comprehensively characterize and compare patients with primary bilateral and unilateral UM. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based and systematic review. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with bilateral (n = 52) and unilateral UM (n = 8915). METHODS: We analysed cases of primary bilateral UM from three data sources: (i) the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center pathology database from 1996 to 2016 (n = 1); (ii) the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-18 database from 1973 to 2013 (n = 5) and (iii) a systematic review of the English language literature (n = 46). Cases of unilateral UM were obtained from the SEER-18 database from 1973 to 2013 for comparison (n = 8915). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and survival. RESULTS: There were no differences in sex, race, mean age at diagnosis, site of uveal involvement, metastases at diagnosis, or treatment among patients with bilateral as compared to unilateral UM. Additionally, there were no clinicopathological differences between the two UMs in each patient with bilateral disease. Overall survival did not differ between unilateral and bilateral UM patients, or between bilateral UM patients who presented with, or subsequently developed, bilateral disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Bilateral and unilateral UM patients share similar demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and prognoses. Moreover, the development of bilateral disease does not portend a poorer prognosis and patients should be treated similarly to those with unilateral disease.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Melanoma , Population Surveillance/methods , SEER Program , Uveal Neoplasms , Visual Acuity/physiology , Global Health , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/physiopathology , Morbidity/trends , Prognosis , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) and uveal melanoma (UM) derive from cutaneous and uveal melanocytes that share the same embryonic origin and display the same cellular function. However, the etiopathogenesis and biological behaviors of these melanomas are very different. CM and UM display distinct landscapes of genetic alterations and show different metastatic routes and tropisms. Hence, therapeutic improvements achieved in the last few years for the treatment of CM have failed to ameliorate the clinical outcomes of patients with UM. The scope of this review is to discuss the differences in tumorigenic processes (etiologic factors and genetic alterations) and tumor biology (gene expression and signaling pathways) between CM and UM. We develop hypotheses to explain these differences, which might provide important clues for research avenues and the identification of actionable vulnerabilities suitable for the development of new therapeutic strategies for metastatic UM.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/physiopathology , Skin Neoplasms/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Carcinogenesis/pathology , Carcinogenesis/radiation effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Melanocytes/pathology , Melanocytes/physiology , Melanoma/classification , Melanoma/genetics , Research/trends , Risk Factors , Signal Transduction/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/classification , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Ultraviolet Rays , Uveal Neoplasms/classification , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
Purpose: To clarify clinical features of patients with uveal melanoma. Method: We analyzed 125 eyes of 125 patients diagnosed as uveal melanoma from 1992 to 2014 retrospectively. Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 58.1±14.4 years. Tumors were originated in the choroid (93%), ciliary body (4%) and iris (3%). The main reasons leading to diagnosis included decreased vision (27%), visual field loss (17%), and no significant symptoms (16%). Average tumor size of the choroidal melanoma was 10.4 mm in largest basal diameter and 7.2 mm in height. Treatment included enucleation of eyeball (53 cases), local resection of the tumor (4 cases), heavy particle beam therapy (18 cases), and brachytherapy (4 cases). Extraocular metastasis was detected in 22% of the patients, and 89% of them died within 5 years. Five-year survival rate was 20% in 6 cases (13.6%) in whom histopathologic studies revealed extrascleral invasions. Conclusions: Prognosis of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma is extremely poor. Early diagnosis and treatment, and establishment of follow-up system after local treatment are critical. Further development and dissemination of novel treatment for metastatic melanoma is desired.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Uveal Neoplasms , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/physiopathology , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/therapy , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Acuity , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To study PTP4A3 phosphatase and MMP14 metalloprotease synergy in uveal melanoma aggressiveness. METHODS: Cell membrane localization of matrix metalloprotease 14 (MMP14) in uveal melanoma cells expressing protein tyrosine phosphatase A3 (PTP4A3) was assessed by flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry. The vesicular trafficking of MMP14 in the presence of PTP4A3 was evaluated in OCM-1 cells expressing either the wild-type or mutated phosphatase. Finally, MMP14 localization at the cell membrane of OCM-1 cells was impaired using RNA interference, and the PTP4A3-related migration in vitro and invasiveness in vivo of the treated cells were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that the membrane-anchored MMP14 is enriched at the cell surface of OCM-1 cells, patient-derived xenograft cells, and human primary uveal melanoma tumors expressing PTP4A3. Moreover, we show that PTP4A3 and MMP14 colocalize and that the vesicular trafficking of MMP14 is faster in the presence of active PTP4A3. Finally, we demonstrate that inhibition of MMP14 expression in uveal melanoma cells expressing PTP4A3 impairs their migration in vitro and invasiveness in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations indicate that PTP4A3 increases cell membrane accumulation of MMP14 as a result of increased cellular trafficking of the metalloprotease. We also show that downregulation of MMP14 expression reduced PTP4A3-induced cell migration and invasiveness. Taken together, our findings suggest that PTP4A3-related subcellular localization of MMP14 is an important event in metastasis induction.
Subject(s)
Cell Membrane/metabolism , Matrix Metalloproteinase 14/physiology , Melanoma/physiopathology , Neoplasm Proteins/physiology , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases/physiology , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement/physiology , Flow Cytometry , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Melanoma/metabolism , Neoplasm Invasiveness/physiopathology , Neoplasm Metastasis/physiopathology , RNA Interference , Uvea/metabolism , Uvea/physiopathology , Uveal Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the expression of Ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2) influences cell-cell adhesion, migration, angiogenesis, and the formation of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) channels in uveal melanomas or how this may be related to the rate of metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Paraffin embedded sections of 50 histopathologically well characterised primary uveal melanomas (mean largest tumour diameter: 16.3 mm) were evaluated with respect to the expression of EphA2. Systemic metastasis was detected in 29 patients. The remaining 21 patients were followed for a mean of 10 years. Tumour angiogensis was analysed by endoglin expression (CD105), the activity of the mature vascular system (von Willebrand factor) and the presence of VM (CD31/PAS staining). RESULTS: All uveal melanomas expressed EphA2, with a mean of 95.93â% positive cells ± SD: 6.3â%. There was no significant association between EphA2 and the rate of metastases (p = 0.196), endoglin expression (p = 0.652), VM (p = 0.267) or with any other clinical or histopathological factors (p < 0.05). However, there was significant up-regulation of EphA2 in the nucleus of the metastatic uveal melanoma subgroup, while cytoplasmatic localisation in the subgroup was associated with better prognosis (p = 0.006). There were low levels of EphA2 expression in the specific retinal layers, the ciliary and corneal epithelium, and the choroidal and corneal endothelium. CONCLUSION: Nuclear expression of EphA2 in this series of large tumours was significantly associated with an increased rate of metastasis. On the other hand, cytoplasmic localisation was associated with a better prognosis. As there was no correlation between EphA2 expression and angiogenesis, the mature vasculature or VM, EphA2 appears to become less important in the advanced stages of the disease.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Melanoma/physiopathology , Receptor, EphA2/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/pathology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Receptor, EphA2/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Diffuse anterior retinoblastoma is an exquisitely rare variant of retinoblastoma in which the tumor resides in the anterior segment of the eye, without apparent retinal involvement. Previously published cases have been managed with enucleation. We describe globe salvage and visual preservation in 3 consecutive cases using chemotherapy and radiotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three children with diffuse anterior retinoblastoma. METHODS: Plaque radiotherapy plus intravenous chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Globe and vision preservation. RESULTS: The mean patient age at presentation elsewhere was 5.7 years (median, 7; range, 3-7 years). There were 2 white female patients and 1 African American male patient. The initial observation by parents/caregiver was reduced vision (n = 1), red eye (n = 1), or cloudy eye (n = 1), and the initial finding by physician was iris tumor (n = 2) or hyphema (n = 1). Referring diagnosis was iris melanoma (n = 1), infectious endotheliitis (n = 1), and possible tumor (nonspecified) (n = 1). At our evaluation, visual acuity was 20/50 to 20/60 (n = 2) and fix no follow (n = 1). In all cases, the opposite eye was normal. Mean intraocular pressure was 20 mm Hg (median, 16; range, 15-30 mmHg). Our examination revealed solid iris tumor (n = 3), ciliary body involvement (n = 2), and anterior chamber seeding (n = 3). In no case was there choroidal or retinal tumor, vitreous seed or subretinal seed, or extrascleral extension. Clear corneal fine-needle aspiration biopsy confirmed the diagnosis as retinoblastoma in each case. Treatment included plaque radiotherapy (n = 3) plus additional systemic chemotherapy (n = 2). At mean follow-up of 35 months (median, 34; range, 20-51 months), there has been no recurrence, extrascleral extension, enucleation, metastasis, or death. In all 3 cases, cataract surgery was necessary at a mean interval of 16 months after complete and stable regression of retinoblastoma. CONCLUSIONS: The rare diffuse anterior form of retinoblastoma can be managed with globe-salvaging alternatives and with visual preservation in selected cases.