ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in ICU is associated with high incidence of difficult intubations. The study aimed to investigate whether the "universal" use of a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope would increase the frequency of "easy intubation" in ICU patients compared to direct laryngoscopy. METHODS: A prospective before-after study was conducted. The pre-interventional period (36 months) involved tracheal intubations using direct laryngoscopy as the first intubation option. In the interventional period (18 months) a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope was the first intubation option. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with "easy intubation" defined as intubation on the first attempt and easy laryngoscopy (modified Cormack-Lehane glottic view of I-IIa). Secondary outcomes included difficult laryngoscopy, operator technical difficulty, and complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 407 patients, 273 in non-interventional period, and 134 in interventional period. Tracheal intubation in the interventional period was associated with higher incidence of "easy intubation" (92.5%) compared with the non-interventional period (75.8%); P < 0.001)). Glottic visualization improved in the interventional period, with a reduced incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (1.5% vs. 22.5%; P < 0.001). The proportion of first-success rate intubation was 92.5% in the interventional period, and 87.8% in the non-interventional period (P = 0.147). Moderate and severe technical difficulty of intubation reported decreased in the interventional period (6% vs. 17.6%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between both periods in the incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: "Universal" use of hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in patients admitted in ICU improves the percentage of easy intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses and randomized studies have shown that among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation is associated with better functional status compared to local anesthesia and sedation, and they recommend its use. But once the procedure is completed, when is the optimal moment for extubation? Currently, there are no guidelines recommending the optimal moment for extubation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation time could potentially be linked to increased complications such as pneumonia or disturbances in cerebral blood flow due to the vasodilatation produced by most anesthetic drugs. However, premature extubation in a patient who has suffered a stroke could led to complications such as agitation, disorientation, abolished reflexes, sudden fluctuations in blood pressure, alterations in cerebral blood flow, respiratory distress, bronchial aspiration, and the need for reintubation. We therefore designed a randomized study hypothesizing that early compared with delayed extubation is associated with a better functional outcome 3 months after endovascular thrombectomy treatment under general anesthesia for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, parallel, evaluated blinded, superiority, randomized controlled trial will include 178 patients with a proximal occlusion of the anterior circulation treated with successful endovascular thrombectomy (TICI 2b-3) under general anesthesia. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive early (< 6 h) or delayed (6-12 h) extubation after the procedure. The primary outcome measure is functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 90 days, measured with the modified Rankin Score (mRS), ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial to compare the effect of mechanical ventilation duration (early vs delayed extubation) after satisfactory endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke under general anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was approved April 11, 2023, by the by the Santiago-Lugo Research Ethics Committee (CEI-SL), number 2023/127, and was registered into the clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry with No. NCT05847309. Informed consent is required. Participant recruitment begins on April 18, 2023. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.
Subject(s)
Airway Extubation , Anesthesia, General , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemic Stroke , Thrombectomy , Humans , Thrombectomy/methods , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Ischemic Stroke/physiopathology , Ischemic Stroke/surgery , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Functional Status , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Respiration, Artificial , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery patients has a higher incidence of difficult laryngoscopic views compared with patients undergoing other types of surgery. The authors hypothesized that using the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for cardiac surgery patients improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation" compared with using a direct Macintosh laryngoscope. DESIGN: A prospective, observational, before-after study. SETTING: At a tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand one hundred nine patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTION: Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were intubated using, as the first option, a Macintosh laryngoscope (preinterventional phase) or a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope (interventional phase). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main objective was to assess whether the use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope, as the first intubation option, improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation," defined as successful intubation on the first attempt, modified Cormack-Lehane grades of I or IIa, and the absence of the need for adjuvant airway devices. A total of 1,109 patients were included, 801 in the noninterventional phase and 308 in the interventional phase. The incidence of "easy intubation" was 93% in the interventional phase versus 78% in the noninterventional phase (p < 0.001). First-success-rate intubation was higher in the interventional phase (304/308; 98.7%) compared with the noninterventional phase (754/801, 94.1%; p = 0.005). Intubation in the interventional phase showed decreases in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (12/308 [3.9%] v 157/801 [19.6%]; p < 0.001), as well as moderate or difficult intubation (5/308 [1.6%] v 57/801 [7.1%]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery improves the percentage of patients with "easy" intubation," increasing glottic view and first-success-rate intubation and decreasing the incidence of moderate or difficult intubation.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngoscopes , Laryngoscopy , Video Recording , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Laryngoscopy/methods , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Video Recording/methods , Operating RoomsSubject(s)
Laryngoscopes , Laryngoscopy , Humans , Operating Rooms , Intubation, Intratracheal , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion in intubated critically ill patients can be difficult, leading to complications, such as gastric bleeding or lesions in the oropharyngeal mucosa. We hypothesised that the use of a videolaryngoscope would facilitate the first attempt at insertion of the transesophageal echocardiogram probe and would decrease the incidence of complications compared to the conventional insertion technique. METHODS: In this clinical trial, patients were randomly assigned the insertion of a transesophageal echocardiogram probe using a videolaryngoscope or conventional technique. The primary outcome was the successful transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion on the first attempt. The secondary outcomes included total success rate, number of insertion attempts, and incidence of pharyngeal complications. RESULTS: A total of 100 intubated critically ill patients were enrolled. The success rate of transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion on the first attempt was higher in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (90% vs. 58%; absolute difference, 32%; 95% CI 16%-48%; p < 0.001). The overall success rate was higher in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (100% vs. 72%; absolute difference, 28%; 95% CI 16%-40%; p < 0.001). The incidence of pharyngeal mucosal injury was smaller in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (14% vs. 52%; absolute difference, 38%; 95% CI 21%-55%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that in intubated critically ill patients required transesophageal echocardiogram, the use of videolaryngoscope resulted in higher successful insertion on the first attempt with lower rate of complications when compared with the conventional insertion technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04980976.
Subject(s)
Laryngoscopes , Laryngoscopy , Humans , Laryngoscopy/adverse effects , Laryngoscopy/methods , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/adverse effects , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Critical Illness/therapy , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
RESUMEN El abordaje de pacientes intoxicados que presentan antecedentes de patología psiquiátrica supone un reto en la atención médica. La presencia de una patología dual puede conducir a que algunos síntomas somáticos sean desestimados y no se consideren como manifestación de una posible patología grave subyacente. Se reporta el caso de una paciente que, durante su hospitalización debida a un episodio depresivo, presentó una sobredosis incidental de opioides. Al recuperarse de ella, sin embargo, presentó comportamiento desorganizado e ideas delirantes, inicialmente atribuidas a la depresión. Estudios ulteriores demostraron una causa orgánica grave subyacente: lesión isquémica bilateral del globo pálido. Se analiza el cuadro clínico a la luz de la literatura pertinente, abordando los temas de delirium, espectro clínico debido a las lesiones del globo pálido y finalizando con una breve descripción sobre la sobredosis y neurotoxicidad por opioides. Frente a síntomas no concordantes con la evolución usual de una descompensación psicopatológica o una intoxicación por drogas, debe ahondarse en la exploración de posibles causas orgánicas, objetivo para el cual se sugiere considerar estudios de neuroimágenes en todo paciente que experimente una sobredosis de opioides y que posteriormente presente graves manifestaciones de una alteración cognitiva.
SUMMARY The approach to intoxicated patients with a previous history of psychopathological manifestations represents a challenge to medical care. The presence of a dual pathology can lead to somatic symptoms being dismissed and not considered as possible manifestations of a serious underlying pathology. We report the case of a patient who, during her hospitalization for a depressive episode, presented an incidental opioid overdose. Upon recovery, she presented disorganized behavior and delusions, initially attributed to her depression. Further studies demonstrated, however, a serious underlying organic cause: A bilateral ischaemic injury of the globus pallidus. The clinical picture is analyzed in the light of the relevant literature, addressing the issues of delirium, clinical spectrum of globus pallidus lesions and ending with a brief description of opioid overdoses and neurotoxicity. Faced with symptoms that are not consistent with the usual course of a psychopathological decompensation or drug intoxication, possible organic causes should be delved into. It is suggested that neuroimaging studies be considered in any patient who suffers from an opioid overdose and who later presents severe cognitive alterations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Prone Position , Wakefulness , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Positioning/methods , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Introduction: In the 20 years since its introduction to the palette of intravenous hemodynamic therapies, the inodilator levosimendan has established itself as a valuable asset for the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Its pharmacology is notable for delivering inotropy via calcium sensitization without an increase in myocardial oxygen consumption.Areas covered: Experience with levosimendan has led to its applications expanding into perioperative hemodynamic support and various critical care settings, as well as an array of situations associated with acutely decompensated heart failure, such as right ventricular failure, cardiogenic shock with multi-organ dysfunction, and cardio-renal syndrome. Evidence suggests that levosimendan may be preferable to milrinone for patients in cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery or for weaning from extracorporeal life support and may be superior to dobutamine in terms of short-term survival, especially in patients on beta-blockers. Positive effects on kidney function have been noted, further differentiating levosimendan from catecholamines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors.Expert opinion:Levosimendan can be a valuable resource in the treatment of acute cardiac dysfunction, especially in the presence of beta-blockers or ischemic cardiomyopathy. When attention is given to avoiding or correcting hypovolemia and hypokalemia, an early use of the drug in the treatment algorithm is preferred.
Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Simendan/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Critical Care , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapyABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: el síncope es una entidad clínica frecuente en urgencias con un pronóstico variable que depende de su etiología. El estudio STePS identificó cuatro variables que se asociaron independientemente con desenlaces graves a 10 días. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar su rendimiento en una población de pacientes que acuden al servicio de urgencias por síncope. Metodología: estudio prospectivo observacional de pacientes que consultaron a urgencias del Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael con diagnóstico de síncope. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las variables demográficas y clínicas de la población, y un análisis comparativo según el ingreso o no a UCI. Se analizaron las variables cualitativas y cuantitativas por medio de prueba de chi cuadrado y t student respectivamente. Las características operativas de la regla STePS fueron evaluadas en una gráfica considerándose como aceptable un área bajo la curva (AUC) mayor a 0.8 y como óptima un AUC mayor a 0.9. Resultados: se incluyeron 98 pacientes. El rendimiento de la regla de predicción STePS fue AUC-ROC 0.64 (IC95%; 0.53-0.75). Sólo el electrocardiograma anormal (OR 13.98, IC 95% 1.29151.9) y trauma concomitante (OR 5.22, IC 95% 1.20-22.67) demostraron ser factores de riesgo para desenlaces graves a 10 días. Se identificaron factores prevalentes en la población con ingreso a UCI: edad >65 años (p=0.02), antecedente de falla cardiaca (p=0.047), enfermedad renal crónica (p=0.002) y cardiopatía (p=0.01). Conclusión: la regla de predicción STePS no tuvo un rendimiento favorable para predicción de desenlaces graves a 10 días del evento sincopal en esta población estudiada.
Abstract Introduction: syncope is a common clinical condition in the emergency room with a variable prognosis depending on its etiology. The STePS study identified four variables which were independently related to serious outcomes within 10 days. The objective of the study was to evaluate its performance in a population of patients seen in the emergency room for syncope. Methods: a prospective observational study of patients seen in the emergency room of the Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael with a diagnosis of syncope. A descriptive analysis of the population's demographic and clinical variables was conducted, along with a comparative analysis according to admission or non-admission to the ICU. Qualitative and quantitative variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Student's t test, respectively. The operative characteristics of the STePS rule were evaluated in a graph, with an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.8 considered to be acceptable, and greater than 0.9 considered to be optimal. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included. The performance of the STePS prediction rule was AUC-ROC 0.64 (95% CI; 0.53-0.75). Only an abnormal electrocardiogram (OR 13.98, 95% CI 1.29-151.9) and concomitant trauma (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.20-22.67) proved to be risk factors for serious outcomes within 10 days. Prevalent factors in the population admitted to the ICU were: age >65 years (p=0.02), a history of heart failure (p=0.047), chronic kidney disease (p=0.002) and heart disease (p=0.01). Conclusion: the STePS prediction rule did not perform favorably for predicting serious outcomes within 10 days of the syncopal event in this study population.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Syncope , Wounds and Injuries , Risk Factors , Threshold Limit Values , Emergencies , Forecasting , Heart DiseasesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the treatment for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prone positioning (PP) during mechanical ventilation for periods of 12-16 h/d to potentially improve oxygenation and survival. In this prospective observational study, we evaluated the ability of long PP sessions to improve oxygenation in awake intensive care unit (ICU) patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to COVID-19. METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee of Galicia (code No. 2020-188), and all patients provided informed consent. In this case series, awake patients with moderate or severe ARDS by COVID-19 admitted to the ICU at University Hospital of Santiago from March 21 to April 5, 2020 were prospectively analyzed. Patients were instructed to remain in PP as long as possible until the patient felt too tired to maintain that position. Light sedation was administered with dexmedetomidine. The following information was collected: number and duration of PP sessions; tissue O2 saturation (StO2) and blood gases before, during, and following a PP session; need of mechanical ventilation; duration of ICU admission; and ICU outcome. Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were fit to estimate changes from baseline with a random effect for patient. RESULTS: Seven patients with moderate or severe ARDS by COVID-19 were included. All patients received at least 1 PP session. A total of 16 PP sessions were performed in the 7 patients during the period study. The median duration of PP sessions was 10 hours. Dexmedetomidine was used in all PP sessions. Oxygenation increased in all 16 sessions performed in the 7 patients. The ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) significantly increased during PP (change from baseline 110 with 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 19-202) and, after PP, albeit not significantly (change from baseline 38 with 97.5% CI, -9.2 to 85) compared with previous supine position. Similarly, tissue oxygenation underwent a small improvement during PP (change from baseline 2.6% with 97.5% CI, 0.69-4.6) without significant changes after PP. Two patients required intubation. All patients were discharged from the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PP improved oxygenation in ICU patients with COVID-19 and moderate or severe ARDS. PP was relatively well tolerated in our patients and may be a simple strategy to improve oxygenation trying to reduce the number of patients in mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the ICU, especially in COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Lung/physiopathology , Patient Positioning , Prone Position , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality of Life , Aftercare , Functional Status , Humans , Patient Discharge , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Positioning , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Supine Position , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Levosimendan was first approved for clinical use in 2000, when authorization was granted by Swedish regulatory authorities for the hemodynamic stabilization of patients with acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (HF). In the ensuing 20 years, this distinctive inodilator, which enhances cardiac contractility through calcium sensitization and promotes vasodilatation through the opening of adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels on vascular smooth muscle cells, has been approved in more than 60 jurisdictions, including most of the countries of the European Union and Latin America. Areas of clinical application have expanded considerably and now include cardiogenic shock, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, advanced HF, right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac surgery, critical care, and emergency medicine. Levosimendan is currently in active clinical evaluation in the United States. Levosimendan in IV formulation is being used as a research tool in the exploration of a wide range of cardiac and noncardiac disease states. A levosimendan oral form is at present under evaluation in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. To mark the 20 years since the advent of levosimendan in clinical use, 51 experts from 23 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine) contributed to this essay, which evaluates one of the relatively few drugs to have been successfully introduced into the acute HF arena in recent times and charts a possible development trajectory for the next 20 years.
Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Myocardial Contraction/drug effects , Simendan/therapeutic use , Vasodilation/drug effects , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiotonic Agents/adverse effects , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Patient Safety , Simendan/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Levosimendan was first approved for clinic use in 2000, when authorisation was granted by Swedish regulatory authorities for the haemodynamic stabilisation of patients with acutely decompensated chronic heart failure. In the ensuing 20 years, this distinctive inodilator, which enhances cardiac contractility through calcium sensitisation and promotes vasodilatation through the opening of adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels on vascular smooth muscle cells, has been approved in more than 60 jurisdictions, including most of the countries of the European Union and Latin America. Areas of clinical application have expanded considerably and now include cardiogenic shock, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, advanced heart failure, right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension, cardiac surgery, critical care and emergency medicine. Levosimendan is currently in active clinical evaluation in the US. Levosimendan in IV formulation is being used as a research tool in the exploration of a wide range of cardiac and non-cardiac disease states. A levosimendan oral form is at present under evaluation in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. To mark the 20 years since the advent of levosimendan in clinical use, 51 experts from 23 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and Ukraine) contributed to this essay, which evaluates one of the relatively few drugs to have been successfully introduced into the acute heart failure arena in recent times and charts a possible development trajectory for the next 20 years.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After cardiac surgery, a patient's trachea is usually extubated; however, 2 to 13% of cardiac surgery patients require reintubation in the ICU. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the initial intubation in the cardiac operating room with reintubation (if required) in the ICU following cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Hospital of Santiago, Spain. PATIENTS: With approval of the local ethics committee, over a 44-month period, we prospectively enrolled all cardiac surgical patients who were intubated in the operating room using direct laryngoscopy, and who required reintubation later in the ICU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was to compare first-time success rates for intubation in the operating room and ICU. Secondary endpoints were to compare the technical difficulties of intubation (modified Cormack-Lehane glottic view, operator-reported difficulty of intubation, need for support devices for direct laryngoscopy) and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: A total of 122 cardiac surgical patients required reintubation in the ICU. Reintubation was associated with a lower first-time success rate than in the operating room (88.5 vs. 97.6%, Pâ=â0.0048). Reintubation in the ICU was associated with a higher incidence of Cormack-Lehane grades IIb, III or IV views (34.5 vs. 10.7%, Pâ<â0.0001), a higher incidence of moderate or difficult intubation (17.2 vs. 6.5%, Pâ=â0.0001) and a greater need for additional support during direct laryngoscopy (20.5 vs. 10.7%, Pâ=â0.005). Complications were more common during reintubations in the ICU (39.3 vs. 5.7%, Pâ<â0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with intubations in the operating room, reintubation of cardiac surgical patients in the ICU was associated with more technical difficulties and a higher incidence of complications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Ethics committee of Galicia number 2015-012.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Laryngoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reoperation/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Airway Extubation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Laryngoscopy/methods , Laryngoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Levosimendan is a myocardial Ca2+ sensitizer and opener of ATP-dependent potassium channels with inotropic, vasodilating, and cardioprotective properties. It was originally developed for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure, but its complex mechanism of action means that it could also play a role in organ protection in response to infection. Using an in vitro approach, we explored whether levosimendan administration influenced cell responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells were stimulated with 1 µg/ml LPS from Escherichia coli (E. coli). Cells were treated with levosimendan at 0, 0.1, 1, or 10 µM 3 hr later. Samples were taken 24 hr after treatment to measure cell necrosis, apoptosis, pro-inflammatory mediators (interleukin 6 [IL-6] and toll-like receptor 4 [TLR4]), and oxidative stress (total reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species [ROS/RNS]). Levosimendan at 1 and 10 µM protected against LPS-induced endothelial cell death and reduced TLR4 expression (p < .05). All doses reduced levels of IL-6 and ROS/RNS (p < .05). Findings suggest that levosimendan may exert protective effects against endothelial cell death in this model via attenuation of inflammation and oxidative stress pathways. Future studies might explore the potential beneficial role of levosimendan in modulating molecular mechanisms triggered by infections.