Graftless Primary Dural Closure Following Retrosigmoid Approach: Doing More With less.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving watertight dural closure without grafts via the retrosigmoid approach can be challenging, contributing to a significant rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. This study describes a dural incision technique for achieving primary dural closure without grafts following the retrosigmoid approach and presents clinical data from the authors' experience. METHODS: Clinical and surgical data of 227 patients who underwent the dural incision technique following the retrosigmoid approach for various pathologies were retrospectively reviewed. To achieve no-graft watertight dural closure, the dural incision involves 2 critical steps: a 1 cm transverse incision of the dura parallel to the foramen magnum to drain CSF from the cisterna magna, and a vertical linear opening of the retrosigmoid dura. Dural incisions were closed watertight with vicryl 4/0 running sutures, without the use of grafts, fibrin glue, hemostatic overlays, or dural substitutes. Pre- or postoperative lumbar drainage was not employed. RESULTS: Primary watertight dural closure was successfully achieved in all patients without the use of grafts or duraplasty. The average duration of dura closure was 17.7 minutes. During an average follow-up period of 49.3 months, there were no instances of CSF leaks or meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' preliminary experience, the linear dural incision described herein was effective for achieving a no-graft, watertight primary dural closure in the retrosigmoid approach, with no CSF leaks or meningitis in our series. Validation of these preliminary data in a larger patient cohort is necessary.

Occipital Sinus-Sparing Linear Paramedian Dural Incision: A Technical Note and Case Series for Median Suboccipital Approach.

BACKGROUND: Durotomies, traditionally used during the midline suboccipital approach, involve sacrificing the occipital sinus (OS) with consequent shrinking of the dura, risk of venous complications, difficulty performing watertight closure, and a higher rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. The present technical note describes the OS-sparing linear paramedian dural incision, which leads to a decrease in the risk of complications during the median suboccipital approach in our case series. METHODS: The OS-sparing linear incision technique involves a dural incision placed 1 cm lateral to the OS. The angle of view of the microscope is frequently changed to overcome the narrowed exposure of the linear durotomy. Copious irrigation with saline prevents drying of the dura. A running watertight closure of the dura is performed. The overall results of 5 cases are reviewed. RESULTS: The cases were 3 tumors and 2 cavernomas. The OS was preserved in all 5, and no duraplasty was needed. The average dura closure time was 16.8 minutes. No CSF leak occurred, and no wound complications were observed. A gross total resection of the lesion was achieved in all the patients. The mean follow-up was 10.2 months, and there were no late complications related to the dura closure. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the types of durotomies conventionally used for the midline suboccipital approach, the OS-sparing linear paramedian dural incision entails lower risks of bleeding, venous complications, CSF leaks, and infections by avoiding duraplasty. Validation of this technical note on a larger patient cohort is needed.