Adapting a selective parent-focused child sexual abuse prevention curriculum for a universal audience: A pilot study.

Parents are an obvious, but underutilized player in the prevention of child sexual abuse (CSA). A handful of universal parent-focused prevention programs have emerged, however, the evidence for these programs is mixed and the programs suffer ubiquitously from barriers to implementation (e.g., poor engagement, low participation) thereby limiting public health impact. To combat these barriers and improve evidence, researchers previously developed and tested a selective parent-focused CSA prevention program. While promising, the selective approach still leaves a gap in the prevention landscape-parents from the universal audience. However, there appear to be no standardized methods to inform this type of adaptation-interventions designed as universal or selective have primarily been delivered as such. This study sought to adapt the selective curriculum for a universal audience and examined the acceptability and feasibility of the program for evaluation in a future trial. Using mixed methods, N = 31 parents (i.e., primary caregiver for a child under 13) completed pre- and post-workshop surveys followed by a brief individual interview conducted via Zoom. Interviews, coded using content analysis methods, focused on three themes: parents as agents of prevention (e.g., prior action, confidence), curriculum (e.g., content, design), and engagement (e.g., future marketing and promotion). Overall participants' mean score on CSA-related awareness and intention to use protective behavioral strategies increased. The participants found the curriculum highly acceptable noting strengths in the content and design. All told, the results of this pilot study suggest the acceptability and feasibility of examining the efficacy of the universal parent-focused curriculum in a larger trial. Procedural challenges, such as bots in recruitment, identify areas of caution in design of the larger trial and a roadmap for others seeking to adapt selective programs for universal audiences.

Evaluation of distal radial artery cross-sectional internal diameter in neonates and infants by ultrasound and adequate selection of an intra-arterial catheter size.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery catheterization in neonates, infants, and young children is a common and useful invasive procedure that brings technical placement challenges and potential complications due to the small diameter size of the radial artery in these patients. The aim of this study is to determine appropriate catheter sizes in infants up to 6 months of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of fifty infants undergoing general anesthesia or hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit were included. Images of the radial artery diameter were obtained from the infant's wrist using Philips EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System CVX Release 4.0. All images obtained were distal in the forearm, medial to the border of the styloid process of the radius, at the point of maximal impulse of the radial artery, and with the wrist at a 45-degree angle position. We recorded postmenstrual age, chronological age, gender, weight, location, comorbidities, medications, weight, and vital signs of each individual. RESULTS: In this single cohort study of 50 children whose ages ranged from 0 to 6 months chronological age, their radial artery diameters were averaged proportionally to their weight and age. Use of a 22G catheter would result in 100% occlusion of the diameter of the artery in most study subjects. Use of a 24G catheter would result in a range of 75%-99% occlusion depending on weight, postmenstrual age, and chronological age of the infants. CONCLUSIONS: In view of these findings, we recommend using US to measure the diameter of the radial artery and choose the most appropriate catheter size before proceeding with US-guidance for radial artery cannulation in infants. This will prevent inappropriate sizing of the catheter and the thrombotic complications this can incur.