Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
EuroIntervention ; 11(1): 75-84, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25868876

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the TriGuard™ Embolic Deflection Device (EDD), a nitinol mesh filter positioned in the aortic arch across all three major cerebral artery take-offs to deflect emboli away from the cerebral circulation, in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective, multicentre DEFLECT I study (NCT01448421) enrolled 37 consecutive subjects undergoing TAVR with the TriGuard EDD. Subjects underwent clinical and cognitive follow-up to 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed pre-procedure and at 4±2 days post procedure. The device performed as intended with successful cerebral coverage in 80% (28/35) of cases. The primary safety endpoint (in-hospital EDD device- or EDD procedure-related cardiovascular mortality, major stroke disability, life-threatening bleeding, distal embolisation, major vascular complications, or need for acute cardiac surgery) occurred in 8.1% of subjects (VARC-defined two life-threatening bleeds and one vascular complication). The presence of new cerebral ischaemic lesions on post-procedure DW-MRI (n=28) was similar to historical controls (82% vs. 76%, p=NS). However, an exploratory analysis found that per-patient total lesion volume was 34% lower than reported historical data (0.2 vs. 0.3 cm3), and 89% lower in patients with complete (n=17) versus incomplete (n=10) cerebral vessel coverage (0.05 vs. 0.45 cm3, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the first-generation TriGuard EDD during TAVR is safe, and device performance was successful in 80% of cases during the highest embolic-risk portions of the TAVR procedure. The potential of the TriGuard EDD to reduce total cerebral ischaemic burden merits further randomised investigation.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Aortic Valve , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Embolic Protection Devices , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Intracranial Embolism/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alloys , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/etiology , Brain Ischemia/prevention & control , Brazil , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Cognition , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Europe , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Intracranial Embolism/diagnosis , Intracranial Embolism/etiology , Intracranial Embolism/mortality , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL