The impact of contemporary multidisciplinary meetings on workload at a tertiary level hospital.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) have become the standard of patient care in oncologic and other speciality care pathways. The number, complexity, and diverse source of imaging studies presented continue to expand rapidly. True multidisciplinary input requires parallel support from other colleagues and diagnostic services. It is now recognised that this is the appropriate forum for key decision making and education in care algorithms, though service plans make little or no accommodation of their expanding role in addition to existing services. AIMS: We tried to objectively quantify one element of this burgeoning service. METHODS: Data were retrospectively gathered over a 6 month period, and a 5 week prospective study was then performed to examine the workload in further detail. RESULTS: Retrospectively, 199 meetings were held with 2253 clinical cases reviewed over 26 weeks. Prospectively, 52 meetings were held over 5 weeks for 13 clinical specialty areas. There were 1038 clinical case discussions. There were a total of 2122 documented individual imaging studies reviewed. Specialist registrar preparation time was 55 h (11 per week). Consultant preparation time was 67.75 h (13.55 per week). Delivery time was 57.25 h (11.45 per week). CONCLUSION: The complexity and range of cases at MDMs continue to expand, serving local and national needs, though service plans do not acknowledge their role in the working day. Our study shows just one element that clearly signals a need to take account of the new methods of delivering modern healthcare.

National Survey of CT Colonography Practice in Ireland.

CT Colonography was first introduced to Ireland in 1999. Our aim of this study is to review current CT Colonography practices in the Republic of Ireland. A questionnaire on CT Colonography practice was sent to all non-maternity adult radiology departments in the Republic of Ireland with a CT scanner. The results are interpreted in the context of the recommendations on CT Colonography quality standards as published by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus statement in the journal of European Radiology in 2013. Thirty centres provide CT Colonography; 21 of which responded (70%). Each centre performs median 90 studies per year; the majority follow accepted patient preparation and image acquisition protocols. Seventy-six percent of the centres repsonded that the majority of patients imaged are symptomatic. Of the 51 consultant radiologists reading CT Colonography, 37 (73%) have attended a CT Colonography course. In 17 (81%) of the centres the studies are single read although 81% of the centres have access to a second radiologist's opinion. Fourteen (67%) of the centres reported limited access to CT scanner time as the major limiting factor to expanding their service. CT Colonography is widely available in Ireland and is largely performed in accordance with European recommendations.

Osteosarcoma in a Patient Receiving Long-Term TNF Inhibitor Therapy.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of developing malignancy. The use of immunosuppressive therapies and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in these patients may provide a further risk for the development of malignancy. We report the clinical and pathological findings of a high grade osteosarcoma in a patient with Crohns disease receiving TNF inhibitor therapy. In this case, a 32-year old female presented with a painful right knee after receiving maintenance adalimumab for Crohns disease for a period of six years. There is a substantial hypothetical link between TNF inhibitor regimens such as adalimumab and an increased risk of malignancy. TNF inhibitor therapy should be ceased and chemotherapy and surgery is an effective combined modality approach in these patients. The role of TNF inhibitors in patients after cancer diagnosis is uncertain and further research is required to assess efficacy and safety.

Inter-hospital transport of critically ill children.

Most Irish paediatric tertiary care services are centralised in Dublin. Many children are transferred there each year from regional paediatric units around the country. We aimed to quantify and describe all children transferred from one regional tertiary hospital over a two year period. Seventy three out of 75 identified transfers were examined. Sixty nine transfers (94.5%) were sent to the major tertiary centre. Fifteen (20.5%) required intensive care services for transfer. Seventeen seriously ill neonates required transfer, however only 4 (23.5%) of those met both the criteria for and the availability of the National Neonatal Transfer Team (NNTT). Significant events during transfer were only documented in 3 cases. Most transfers arrived in Dublin outside normal working hours. Standards of documentation were found to be very inconsistent. In conclusion, a national transport service for all critically ill children is urgently needed in Ireland.