Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 11: 23247096231184770, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394803

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) is a common cause of nephropathy in kidney transplant patients and is typically seen within the first year after transplantation. BK polyomavirus nephropathy can occur in the native kidneys of patients with nonrenal solid-organ transplants (NRSOT). However, this is rare, especially outside the early post-transplant period, and BKVN is not usually considered in the differential diagnosis for acute kidney injury in NRSOT patients. We present a case of a 75-year-old man who had undergone orthotopic heart transplant 13 years prior with stable allograft function who developed progressive renal dysfunction in the setting of recent unilateral obstructive nephrolithiasis requiring ureteral stenting. Kidney biopsy demonstrated evidence of polyomavirus nephritis. Serum BK viral load was elevated. Despite reducing immunosuppression and initiating leflunomide, viral clearance was never achieved. The patient experienced progressive failure to thrive before ultimately transitioning to hospice care and dying. The intensity of immunosuppression is a well-known risk factor for viral replication; ureteral stenting has also been associated with BKVN. However, since clinical manifestations of BK viral infections often include a genitourinary (GU) tract pathology, it is important for clinicians to consider BKVN in patients with NRSOT with progressive renal dysfunction, especially in the clinical context of known GU disease.


BK Virus , Heart Transplantation , Kidney Transplantation , Nephritis, Interstitial , Polyomavirus Infections , Male , Humans , Aged , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Nephritis, Interstitial/pathology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Polyomavirus Infections/complications
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(1): 101418, 2023 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36181784

The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.


Acute Coronary Syndrome , Myocardial Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Bundle-Branch Block/epidemiology , Bundle-Branch Block/etiology , Prognosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications
...