Digoxin and Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia and Death in ICD Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown digoxin use to be associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality. There are limited data on whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of VT/VF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a primary prevention ICD in landmark clinical trials. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator who were enrolled in 4 landmark MADIT trials (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials). We employed propensity score quintile stratification for treatment with digoxin as well as additional multivariable adjustment to assess the risk of digoxin vs no-digoxin therapy for the endpoints of first and recurrent VT/VF and all-cause mortality. The proportional hazards regression models for arrhythmia-specific endpoints incorporated adjustments for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: At baseline, 1,155 of 4,499 patients were on digoxin (26%). After propensity score quintile stratification, patients prescribed digoxin were shown to exhibit a statistically significant 48% increased risk of VT/VF (P < 0.001), 42% increased risk of the composite of VT/VF or death (P < 0.001), and a 37% increased risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.006). Digoxin use was also associated with increased risk of appropriate ICD shocks (HR: 1.91; P < 0.001) and with increased burden of VT/VF events (HR: 1.46; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggests that digoxin use is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with an ICD.

Association of device detected atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia with adverse events in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) are known to have worse outcomes. However, there are limited data on the temporal relationship between development of these arrhythmias and the risk of subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation and death. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 5511 patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in landmark clinical trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, and RAID) who were in sinus rhythm at enrollment. Multivariate cox analysis was performed to evaluate the time-dependent association between development of in-trial device detected AF and VT/VF with subsequent CHF exacerbation and death. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that AF occurrence and VT/VF occurrence were both associated with a similar magnitude of risk for subsequent CHF exacerbation (HR = 1.73 and 1.87 respectively, p < .001 for both). In contrast, only in-trial VT/VF was associated with a significant > two-fold increase in the risk of subsequent mortality (HR = 2.13, p < .001) whereas AF occurrence was not associated with a significant mortality increase after adjustment for in-trial VT/VF (HR = 1.36, p = .096). CONCLUSION: Our findings from a large cohort of ICD recipients enrolled in landmark clinical trials show that device detected AF and VT/VF can be used to identify patients with increased risk for CHF exacerbation and mortality. These findings suggest a need for early intervention in CHF patients who develop device-detected atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Risk Prediction in Male Adolescents With Congenital Long QT Syndrome: Implications for Sex-Specific Risk Stratification in Potassium Channel-Mediated Long QT Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific risk management may improve outcomes in congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). We recently developed a prediction score for cardiac events (CEs) and life-threatening events (LTEs) in postadolescent women with LQTS. In the present study, we aimed to develop personalized risk estimates for the burden of CEs and LTEs in male adolescents with potassium channel-mediated LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prognostic model was derived from the LQTS Registry headquartered in Rochester, NY, comprising 611 LQT1 or LQT2 male adolescents from age 10 through 20 years, using the following variables: genotype/mutation location, QTc-specific thresholds, history of syncope, and ß-blocker therapy. Anderson-Gill modeling was performed for the end point of CE burden (total number of syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and appropriate defibrillator shocks). The applicability of the CE prediction model was tested for the end point of the first LTE (excluding syncope and adding sudden cardiac death) using Cox modeling. A total of 270 CEs occurred during follow-up. The genotype-phenotype risk prediction model identified low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, comprising 74%, 14%, and 12% of the study population, respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, high-risk male subjects experienced a pronounced 5.2-fold increased risk of recurrent CEs (P<0.001), whereas intermediate-risk patients had a 2.1-fold (P=0.004) increased risk . At age 20 years, the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk adolescent male patients had on average 0.3, 0.6, and 1.4 CEs per person, respectively. Corresponding 10-year adjusted probabilities for a first LTE were 2%, 6%, and 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized genotype-phenotype risk estimates can be used to guide sex-specific management in male adolescents with potassium channel-mediated LQTS.

QRS Morphology and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess whether QRS morphology is associated with risk of ventricular arrhythmias in CRT recipients. METHODS: The study population comprised 2,862 patients implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/CRT-D for primary prevention who were enrolled in 5 landmark primary prevention ICD trials (MADIT-II [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial], MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], MADIT-RIT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy], MADIT-RISK [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-RISK], and RAID [Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators]). Patients with QRS duration ≥130 ms were divided into 2 groups: those implanted with an ICD only vs CRT-D. The primary endpoint was fast ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) (defined as VT ≥200 beats/min or VF), accounting for the competing risk of death. Secondary endpoints included appropriate shocks, any sustained VT or VF, and the burden of fast VT/VF, assessed in a recurrent event analysis. RESULTS: Among patients with left bundle branch block (n = 1,792), those with CRT-D (n = 1,112) experienced a significant 44% (P < 0.001) reduction in the risk of fast VT/VF compared with ICD-only patients (n = 680), a significantly lower burden of fast VT/VF (HR: 0.55; P = 0.001), with a reduced burden of appropriate shocks (HR: 0.44; P < 0.001). In contrast, among patients with non-left bundle branch block (NLBBB) (N = 1,070), CRT-D was not associated with reduction in fast VT/VF (HR: 1.33; P = 0.195). Furthermore, NLBBB patients with CRT-D experienced a statistically significant increase in the burden of fast VT/VF events compared with ICD-only patients (HR: 1.90; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a potential proarrhythmic effect of CRT among patients with NLBBB. These data should be considered in patient selection for treatment with CRT.

Persistent and Recurrent Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data exist on the evolution of device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT in LAAC recipients. METHODS: Data were obtained from an international multicenter registry including 237 patients diagnosed with DRT after LAAC. Of these, 214 patients with a subsequent imaging examination after the initial diagnosis of DRT were included. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was defined as either persisting or recurrent DRT. RESULTS: DRT resolved in 153 (71.5%) cases and persisted in 61 (28.5%) cases. Larger DRT size (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.009) and female (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.12-5.26; P = 0.02) were independently associated with persistent DRT. After DRT resolution, 82 (53.6%) of 153 patients had repeated device imaging, with 14 (17.1%) cases diagnosed with recurrent DRT. Overall, 75 (35.0%) patients had unfavorable evolution of DRT, and the sole predictor was average thrombus size at initial diagnosis (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003), with an optimal cutoff size of 7 mm (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.39-4.52; P = 0.002). Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a higher rate of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT (26.7% vs 15.1%; HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.15-3.94; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: About one-third of DRT events had an unfavorable evolution (either persisting or recurring), with a larger initial thrombus size (particularly >7 mm) portending an increased risk. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT.

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Introduction: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The benefit of the ICD in patients with advanced CKD, remains elusive. Moreover, the benefit of the ICD in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HFrEF who are cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients may be attenuated. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients with CKD who are CRT recipients may derive less benefit from the ICD due to the competing risk of dying prior to experiencing an arrhythmia. Methods: The study population included 1,015 patients receiving CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) device for primary prevention of SCD who were enrolled in either (Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial) MADIT-CRT trial or the Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients with Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator (RAID) trial. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the stage of CKD: those with Stage 1 to 3a KD, labeled as (S1-S3a)KD. The second group included patients with Stage 3b to stage 5 kidney disease, labeled as (S3b-S5)KD. The primary endpoint was any ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (Any VT/VF). Results: The cumulative incidence of Any VT/VF was 23.5% in patients with (S1-S3a)KD and 12.6% in those with (S3b-S5)KD (p < 0.001) The incidence of Death without Any VT/VF was 6.6% in patients with (S1-S3a)KD and 21.6% in patients with (S3b-S5)KD (p < 0.001). A Fine and Gray multivariate competing risk regression model showed that Patients with (S3b-S5)KD had a 43% less risk of experiencing Any VT/VF when compared to those with (S1-S3a)KD (HR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.33-0.94] p = 0.03. After two years of follow up, there was almost a 5-fold increased risk of Death without Any VT/VF among patients with (S3b-S5)KD when compared to those with (S1-S3a)KD [HR = 4.63, 95% CI (2.46-8.72), p for interaction with time = 0.012]. Conclusion: Due to their lower incidence of arrhythmias and higher risk of dying prior to experiencing an arrhythmia, the benefit of the ICD may be attenuated in CRT recipients with advanced CKD. Future prospective trials should evaluate whether CRT without a defibrillator may be more appropriate for these patients.

Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Both selective and nonselective beta-blockers are used to treat patients with heart failure (HF). However, the data on the association of beta-blocker type with risk of atrial arrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in HF patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effect of metoprolol vs carvedilol on the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and VA in HF patients with an ICD. METHODS: This study pooled primary prevention ICD recipients from 5 landmark ICD trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, MADIT-RISK, and RAID). Fine and Gray multivariate regression models, stratified by study, were used to evaluate the risk of ATA, inappropriate ICD shocks, and fast VA (defined as ventricular tachycardia ≥200 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation) by beta-blocker type. RESULTS: Among 4,194 patients, 2,920 (70%) were prescribed carvedilol and 1,274 (30%) metoprolol. The cumulative incidence of ATA at 3.5 years was 11% in patients treated with carvedilol vs 15% in patients taking metoprolol (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that carvedilol treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the risk of ATA (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.81; P < 0.001) when compared to metoprolol, and with a corresponding 35% reduction in the risk of inappropriate ICD shocks (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P = 0.008). Carvedilol vs metoprolol was also associated with a 16% reduction in the risk of fast VA. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02; P = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggests that HF patients with ICDs on carvedilol treatment experience a significantly lower risk of ATA and inappropriate ICD shocks when compared to treatment with metoprolol.

Genetic variant annotation scores in congenital long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact. METHODS: We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1-LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index. RESULTS: A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; p < .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, p < .001). CONCLUSION: In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.

Association Between Syncope Trigger Type and Risk of Subsequent Life-Threatening Events in Patients With Long QT Syndrome.

Importance: Syncope is the most powerful predictor for subsequent life-threatening events (LTEs) in patients with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Whether distinct syncope triggers are associated with differential subsequent risk of LTEs is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between adrenergic (AD)- and nonadrenergic (non-AD)-triggered syncopal events and the risk of subsequent LTEs in patients with LQT types 1 to 3 (LQT1-3). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included data from 5 international LQTS registries (Rochester, New York; the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Israel, the Netherlands, and Japan). The study population comprised 2938 patients with genetically confirmed LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 stemming from a single LQTS-causative variant. Patients were enrolled from July 1979 to July 2021. Exposures: Syncope by AD and non-AD triggers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the first occurrence of an LTE. Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine the association of AD- or non-AD-triggered syncope on the risk of subsequent LTE by genotype. Separate analysis was performed in patients with ß-blockers. Results: A total of 2938 patients were included (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 29 [7] years; 1645 [56%] female). In 1331 patients with LQT1, a first syncope occurred in 365 (27%) and was induced mostly with AD triggers (243 [67%]). Syncope preceded 43 subsequent LTEs (68%). Syncopal episodes associated with AD triggers were associated with the highest risk of subsequent LTE (hazard ratio [HR], 7.61; 95% CI, 4.18-14.20; P < .001), whereas the risk associated with syncopal events due to non-AD triggers was statistically nonsignificant (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.21-4.77; P = .97). In 1106 patients with LQT2, a first syncope occurred in 283 (26%) and was associated with AD and non-AD triggers in 106 (37%) and 177 (63%), respectively. Syncope preceded 55 LTEs (56%). Both AD- and non-AD-triggered syncope were associated with a greater than 3-fold increased risk of subsequent LTE (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.66-5.67; P ≤ .001 and HR, 3.45, 95% CI, 1.96-6.06; P ≤ .001, respectively). In contrast, in 501 patients with LQT3, LTE was preceded by a syncopal episode in 7 (12%). In patients with LQT1 and LQT2, treatment with ß-blockers following a syncopal event was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent LTEs. The rate of breakthrough events during treatment with ß-blockers was significantly higher among those treated with selective agents vs nonselective agents. Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, trigger-specific syncope in LQTS patients was associated with differential risk of subsequent LTE and response to ß-blocker therapy.

Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes Among Black Patients and White Patients With a Primary Prevention Defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Black Americans have a higher risk of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) than White Americans. We aimed to evaluate differences in the risk of tachyarrhythmias among patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: The study population comprised 3895 ICD recipients in the United States enrolled in primary prevention ICD trials. Outcome measures included ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA), atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), ICD therapies, VTA burden (using Andersen-Gill recurrent event analysis), death, and the predicted benefit of the ICD. All events were adjudicated blindly. Outcomes were compared between self-reported Black patients versus White patients with cardiomyopathy (ischemic and NICM). RESULTS: Black patients were more likely to be female (35% versus 22%) and younger (57±12 versus 62±12 years) with a higher frequency of comorbidities. In NICM, Black patients had a higher rate of first VTA, fast VTA, ATA, and appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy (VTA ≥170 bpm, 32% versus 20%; VTA ≥200 bpm, 22% versus 14%; ATA, 25% versus 12%; appropriate therapy, 30% versus 20%; and inappropriate therapy, 25% versus 11%; P<0.001 for all). Multivariable analysis showed that Black patients with NICM experienced a higher risk of all types of arrhythmia or ICD therapy (VTA ≥170 bpm, hazard ratio [HR] 1.71; VTA ≥200 bpm, HR 1.58; ATA, HR 1.87; appropriate therapy, HR 1.62; inappropriate therapy, HR 1.86; P≤0.01 for all), higher burden of tachyarrhythmias or therapies (VTA, HR 1.84; appropriate therapy, HR 1.84; P<0.001 for both), and a higher risk of death (HR 1.92; P=0.014). In contrast, in ischemic cardiomyopathy, the risk of all types of tachyarrhythmia, ICD therapy, or death was similar between Black patients and White patients. Both Black patients and White patients derived a significant and similar benefit from ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NICM with an ICD for primary prevention, Black patients compared with White patients had a high risk and burden of VTA, ATA, and ICD therapies with a lower survival rate. Nevertheless, the overall benefit of the ICD was maintained and was similar to that of White patients.

Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator.

Background: Black Americans have a higher risk of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) than White Americans. We aimed to evaluate racial disparities in the risk of tachyarrhythmias among patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Methods: The study population comprised 3,895 ICD recipients enrolled in the U.S. in primary prevention ICD trials. Outcome measures included first and recurrent ventricular tachy-arrhythmia (VTA) and atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), derived from adjudicated device data, and death. Outcomes were compared between self-reported Black vs. White patients with a cardiomyopathy (ischemic [ICM] and NICM). Results: Black patients were more likely to be female (35% vs 22%) and younger (57±12 vs 62±12) with a higher frequency of comorbidities. Blacks patients with NICM compared with Whites patients had a higher rate of first VTA, fast VTA, ATA, appropriate-, and inappropriate-ICD-therapy (VTA≥170bpm: 32% vs. 20%; VTA≥200bpm: 22% vs. 14%; ATA: 25% vs. 12%; appropriate 30% vs 20%; and inappropriate: 25% vs. 11%; p<0.001 for all). Multivariable analysis showed that Black patients with NICM experienced a higher risk of all types of arrhythmia/ICD-therapy (VTA≥170bpm: HR=1.69; VTA≥200bpm: HR=1.58; ATA: HR=1.87; appropriate: HR=1.62; and inappropriate: HR=1.86; p≤0.01 for all), higher burden of VTA, ATA, ICD therapies, and a higher risk of death (HR=1.86; p=0.014). In contrast, in ICM, the risk of all types of tachyarrhythmia, ICD therapy, or death was similar between Black and White patients. Conclusions: Among NICM patients with an ICD for primary prevention, Black compared with White patients had a high risk and burden of VTA, ATA, and ICD therapies. Clinical Perspective: What Is New?: Black patients have a higher risk of developing non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) but are under-represented in clinical trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Therefore, data on disparities in the presentation and outcomes in this population are limited.This analysis represents the largest group of self-identified Black patients implanted in the U.S. with an ICD for primary prevention with adjudication of all arrhythmic events.What Are the Clinical Implications?: In patients with a NICM, self-identified Black compared to White patients experienced an increased incidence and burden of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, atrial tachyarrhythmia, and ICD therapies. These differenced were not observed in Black vs White patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).Although Black patients with NICM were implanted at a significantly younger age (57±12 vs 62±12 years), they experienced a 2-fold higher rate of all-cause mortality during a mean follow up of 3 years compared with White patients.These findings highlight the need for early intervention with an ICD, careful monitoring, and intensification of heart failure and antiarrhythmic therapies among Black patients with NICM.

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis: a case report.

Background: The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-associated myocarditis has been reported. Most of the reported cases are mild, with quick clinical recovery and excellent short-term outcomes. Cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) are rare. Case Description: A 46-year-old male patient with no prior cardiac history presented following two episodes of syncope. Two days earlier, he had received his second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer)-first dose was administered three weeks earlier. He had an episode of VT while in the emergency room. His cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were consistent with myocarditis. He was eventually diagnosed with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis after all other work up were unremarkable [echocardiogram, coronary angiogram, diagnostic electrophysiology study and later 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) metabolism cardiac sarcoid positron emission tomography (PET) study]. An implantable cardiac monitor was implanted to monitor for recurrence of VT. Seven months after initial presentation, he had recurrent VT and he underwent implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). He has received appropriate ICD therapies on account of recurrent VT and he is currently maintained on an antiarrhythmic medication. Conclusions: Excellent short-term outcomes have been reported in patients with COVID-19 vaccine associated myocarditis. Our case shows that long-term outcomes may not be benign in everyone, particularly in those who develop myocardial scar.

Arrhythmogenic Cardiotoxicity Associated With Contemporary Treatments of Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Background There are limited data on risk of arrhythmias among patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. We designed this study to determine the risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia during treatment of lymphoma in a real-world setting. Methods and Results The study population comprised 2064 patients included in the University of Rochester Medical Center Lymphoma Database from January 2013 to August 2019. Cardiac arrhythmias-atrial fibrillation/flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmia, and bradyarrhythmia-were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the risk of arrhythmic events with treatments categorized as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), mainly ibrutinib/non-BTKi treatment versus no treatment. Median age was 64 (54-72) years, and 42% were women. The overall rate of any arrhythmia at 5 years following the initiation of BTKi was (61%) compared with (18%) without treatment. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was the most common type of arrhythmia accounting for 41%. Multivariate analysis showed that BTKi treatment was associated with a 4.3-fold (P<0.001) increased risk for arrhythmic event (P<0.001) compared with no treatment, whereas non-BTKi treatment was associated with a 2-fold (P<0.001) risk increase. Among subgroups, patients without a history of prior arrhythmia exhibited a pronounced increase in the risk for the development of arrhythmogenic cardiotoxicity (3.2-fold; P<0.001). Conclusions Our study identifies a high burden of arrhythmic events after initiation of treatment, which is most pronounced among patients treated with the BTKi ibrutinib. Patients undergoing treatments for lymphoma may benefit from prospective focused cardiovascular monitoring prior, during, and after treatment regardless of arrhythmia history.

Age and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in elderly patients is controversial. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) and ICD shocks by age groups and to assess the competing risk for VTA and death without prior VTA. METHODS: The study included 5,170 primary prevention ICD recipients enrolled in 5 landmark ICD trials (MADIT [Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial] II, MADIT-Risk, MADIT-CRT [MADIT Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], MADIT-RIT [MADIT Reduce Inappropriate Therapy], and RAID [Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator]). Fine and Gray regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk for fast VTA (ventricular tachycardia ≥200 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation) vs death without prior fast VTA in 3 prespecified age groups: <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 years. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of fast VTA at 3 years was similar for patients <65 years of age and those 65 to <75 years of age (17% vs 15%) and was lowest among patients ≥75 years of age (10%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate Fine and Gray analysis showed a 40% lower risk for fast VTA in patients ≥75 years of age (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78; P < 0.001) compared with patients <65 years of age. In patients ≥75 years of age, a risk reversal was observed whereby the risk for death without prior fast VTA exceeded the risk for developing fast VTA. A history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, male sex, and the presence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy were identified as predictors of fast VTA in patients ≥75 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients ≥75 years of age have a significantly lower risk for VTA and ICD shocks compared with younger patients. Aging is associated with a higher risk for death compared with the risk for fast VTA, the reverse of what is seen in younger patients.

Insertable cardiac monitor-guided early intervention to reduce atrial fibrillation burden following catheter ablation: Study design and clinical protocol (ICM-REDUCE-AF trial).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) to achieve pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recurrence rates after a single AF ablation procedure remain elevated. Conventional management after CA ablation has mostly been based on clinical AF recurrence. However, continuous recordings with insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) and patient-triggered mobile app transmissions post-CA can now be used to detect early recurrences of subclinical AF (SCAF). We hypothesize that early intervention following CA based on personalized ICM data can prevent the substrate progression that promotes the onset and maintenance of atrial arrhythmias. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind (to SCAF data), single-tertiary center clinical trial in which 120 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF are planned to undergo CA with an ICM. Randomization will be to an intervention arm (n = 60) consisting of ICM-guided early intervention based on SCAF and patient-triggered mobile app transmissions versus a control arm (n = 60) consisting of a standard intervention protocol based on clinical AF recurrence validated by the ICM. Primary endpoint is AF burden, which will be assessed from ICMs at 15 months post-AF ablation. Secondary endpoints include healthcare utilization, functional capacity, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: We believe that ICM-guided early intervention will provide a novel, personalized approach to post-AF ablation management that will result in a significant reduction in AF burden, healthcare utilization, and improvements in functional capacity and quality of life.

Confirm Rx insertable cardiac monitor for primary atrial fibrillation detection in high-risk heart failure patients (Confirm-AF trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) represent a large population of patients who are at high risk for complications related to undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). However, currently there are limited modalities available for early AF detection in this high-risk population. An implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is inserted subcutaneously and can provide long-term arrhythmia information via remote monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: Confirm-AF is a prospective randomized, nonblinded, two arm, multicenter clinical trial to be performed in the United States, enrolling 477 patients with a history of HF hospitalization and left ventricular ejection fraction >35% from 30 medical sites. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to undergo ICM implant with remote monitoring and symptom-triggered mobile app transmissions versus (vs.) Non-ICM management and follow-up. The primary objective of this trial is to compare the time to first detection of AF lasting > 5 min using an Abbott ICM compared to non-ICM monitoring in symptomatic HF patients. This article describes the design and analytic plan for the Confirm-AF trial. CONCLUSIONS: The Confirm-AF trial seeks to accurately define the burden of AF in high-risk HF patients with LVEF > 35% using an Abbott ICM. A finding showing significantly higher incidence of AF along with improved clinical outcomes with ICM monitoring is expected to have substantial clinical implications and may change the method of monitoring high-risk HF patients.

Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Targeted Treatment of Lymphoma.

Background: Lymphoma treatment may be associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), especially among patients treated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Objectives: The authors sought to assess the risk of new-onset AF, AF risk factors, and the impact of AF on mortality in patients with lymphoma and no history of AF. Methods: The University of Rochester Medical Center Lymphoma Database was used to identify patients. The primary outcome was any AF episode identified using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision codes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the risk of AF through the use of a time-dependent covariate for treatment overall as well as separate time-varying measures of BTKi (mainly ibrutinib) and non-BTKi treatment. The relative risk of all-cause mortality was determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: Among 1,957 lymphoma patients, the rate of AF at 5-years following initiation of BTKi treatment was higher (25%) compared to those receiving non-BTKi therapy (8%), and those receiving no treatment (4%). Multivariable analysis showed that BTKi treatment was associated with pronounced increased risk for AF compared to no treatment (HR: 5.07 [95% CI: 2.88-8.90; P < 0.001]). Non-BTKi treatment was associated with an increased risk of AF compared to no treatment (HR: 1.82 [95% CI: 1.14-2.89; P = 0.012]). Risk factors for the development of AF included age ≥64 years, male sex, hypertension, and lymphoma treatment. New AF was associated with an increased risk for subsequent mortality (HR: 3.71 [95% CI: 2.59-5.31]). Conclusions: Patients undergoing lymphoma treatment, especially those with high-risk features, may benefit from AF surveillance.

Anesthetic Management and Considerations for Electrophysiology Procedures.

The number of electrophysiology (EP) procedures being performed has dramatically increased in recent years. This escalation necessitates a full understanding by the general anesthesiologist as to the risks, specific considerations, and comorbidities that accompany these now common procedures. Procedures reviewed in this article include atrial fibrillation and flutter ablation, supraventricular tachycardia ablation, ventricular tachycardia ablation, electrical cardioversion, pacemaker insertion, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion, and ICD lead extraction. General anesthetic considerations as well as procedure-specific concerns are discussed. Knowledge of these procedures will add to the anesthesiologist's armamentarium in safely caring for patients in the EP laboratory.

Sex Differences in the Risk of First and Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention.

Importance: Current guidelines for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy do not account for sex differences in arrhythmic risk in ICD candidates. Objective: To evaluate the association between sex and risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study compared differences in the risk of VTA and mortality between 4506 men and women enrolled in the 4 Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials (MADIT) between July 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011. Data from prospective randomized controlled multicenter studies were analyzed retrospectively. Men and women with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator who were enrolled in all MADIT studies were included. Data were analyzed between January 10 and June 10, 2021. Exposures: ICD implant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was sustained VTA, defined as ICD-recorded, treated or monitored VTA at least 170/min or ventricular fibrillation. Secondary VTA end points included VTA at least 200/min, appropriate ICD shocks, and appropriate antitachycardia pacing. All end points were included in a first and recurrent event analysis. Results: Of the 4506 study participants, 3431 were men (76%). Mean (SD) age of the cohort was 64 (12) years. For women vs men, the mean (SD) age (64 [12] years vs 64 [11] years) and left ventricular ejection fraction (24% vs 25%) were similar, but women exhibited a higher frequency of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (454 of 1075 women [42%] vs 2535 of 3431 men [74%]). Women had significantly lower 3-year cumulative probability of sustained VTA (16% vs 26%), fast VTA (9% vs 17%), and appropriate ICD shocks (7% vs 15%) compared with men (P < .001 for all). Multivariable analysis showed that female sex was independently associated with at least 40% lower risk of all first and recurrent VTA end points (P < .001 for all), including the primary end point (first event, HR = 60 [95% CI, 50-73], P < .001; recurrent event, HR = 49 [95% CI, 43-55], P < .001), after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and nonarrhythmic mortality. The lower VTA risk associated with female sex was consistent in risk subsets but was significantly more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (female vs male in the ischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95], P = .02; nonischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.38-0.66], P < .001; P = .03 for interaction between female sex and cardiomyopathy). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest that women display a significantly lower risk of first and recurrent life-threatening VTA events than men, and that it is more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, suggesting a need for sex-specific risk assessment for primary prevention ICD therapy.