High-risk rural surgical patients and poor access to elective colorectal cancer surgery: insight for multilevel intervention for rural America.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death in rural America. Rural populations are large and heterogeneous, yet patient-related drivers of inequities in CRC access are understudied. This study aimed to identify vulnerable rural populations at lower odds of undergoing elective CRC surgery. METHODS: Evaluation of the Policy Map and United States Census Bureau identified factors associated with poor surgical access in the most populous states (by total rural population). To assess whether these identified factors were associated with reduced access to elective CRC surgery, the 2007 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to evaluate 69,212 hospitalizations of rural patients undergoing CRC surgery. Rural was defined as counties with a population of <250,000. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors of elective CRC surgery. Patient- and hospital-level factor interactions were specified a priori. RESULTS: More than 72% of hospitalizations of rural patients were elective. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that older age, multimorbidity, Black race, Latino-Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance, and rural hospitals predicted lower odds of elective CRC surgery. On interaction analyses, high-risk patients were less likely to undergo elective CRC surgery in urban facilities relative to rural. CONCLUSION: In this large study of rural dwellers, ethnoracial minorities, elders, and Medicaid beneficiaries had profoundly less access to elective CRC surgery, especially when care was received in urban settings. Future studies should focus on exploring actionable social drivers of health in these rural populations. Findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions to enhance rural access to equitable and quality surgical cancer care.

Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract State-of-the-Art Session 2022: Frailty in Surgery.

Given the exponentially aging population and rising life expectancy in the United States, surgeons are facing a challenging frail population who may require surgery but may not qualify based on their general fitness. There is an urgent need for greater awareness of the importance of frailty measurement and the implementation of universal assessment of frail patients into clinical practice. Pairing risk stratification with stringent protocols for prehabilitation and minimally invasive surgery and appropriate enhanced recovery protocols could optimize and condition frail patients before, during, and immediately after surgery to mitigate postoperative complications and consequences on patient function and quality of life. In this paper, highlights from the 2022 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract State-of-the-Art Session on frailty in surgery are presented. This work aims to improve the understanding of the impact of frailty on patients and the methods used to augment the outcomes for frail patients during their surgical experience.

Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery After Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: A Multistate Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Despite their higher incidence of colorectal cancer, ethnoracial minority and low-income patients have reduced access to elective colorectal cancer surgery. Although the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion increased screening of colonoscopies, its effect on disparities in elective colorectal cancer surgery remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effects of Medicaid expansion on elective colorectal cancer surgery rates overall and by race-ethnicity and income. DESIGN: Using the 2012 to 2015 State Inpatient Databases, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. SETTINGS: State Inpatient Databases from 3 expansion states (Maryland, New Jersey, and Kentucky) and 2 nonexpansion states (Florida and North Carolina) were used. PATIENTS: This study examined 22,304 adult patients aged 18 to 64 years who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using interrupted time series analysis, the effect of Medicaid expansion on the odds of elective colorectal cancer surgery was assessed. RESULTS: Elective vs nonelective surgery rates remained unchanged overall (70.2% vs 70.7%, p = 0.63) and in ethnoracial minorities in expansion states (whites from 72.8% to 73.8% pre to post, p = 0.40 and non-white from 64.0% to 63.1% pre to post, p = 0.67). There was an instantaneous increase in odds of elective surgery in expansion vs nonexpansion states at policy implementation (adjusted OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.79; p = 0.02), but it subsequently decreased (combined adjusted OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.03). Elective surgery rates were also unchanged among ethnoracial minorities (instantaneous changes in expansion states, combined effect 1.06; pre-trend 1.01 vs post-trend 0.98) and low-income persons in expansion states (pre-trend 1.03 vs post-trend 0.97) (for all, p > 0.1). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to 5 states. Although patients may have increased access to cancer screening services and surgery after expansion, the State Inpatient Databases only provide information on patients who underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite gains in screening, Medicaid expansion was not associated with reductions in known ethnoracial or income-based disparities in elective colorectal cancer surgery rates. Expanding access to colorectal cancer surgery for underserved populations likely requires attention to provider and health system factors contributing to persistent disparities. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C217 . DISPARIDADES PERSISTENTES EN EL ACCESO A LA CIRUGA ELECTIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL DESPUS DE LA EXPANSIN DE MEDICAID EN VIRTUD DE LA LEY DEL CUIDADO DE SALUD A BAJO PRECIO UNA EVALUACIN MULTIESTATAL: ANTECEDENTES: A pesar de su mayor incidencia de cáncer colorrectal, los pacientes de minorías etnoraciales y de bajos ingresos tienen un acceso reducido a la cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal. Aunque la expansión de Medicaid de la Ley del Cuidado de Salud a Bajo Precio aumentó las colonoscopias de detección, aún se desconoce su efecto sobre las disparidades en la cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO: Este estudio evaluó los efectos de la expansión de Medicaid en las tasas de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal en general y por raza, etnia e ingresos.DISEÑO: Utilizando las bases de datos estatales de pacientes hospitalizados de 2012-2015, se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN: Se utilizaron bases de datos estatales de pacientes hospitalizados de tres estados en expansión (Maryland, Nueva Jersey, Kentucky) y dos estados sin expansión (Florida, Carolina del Norte).PACIENTES: Este estudio examinó a 22,304 pacientes adultos de 18 a 64 años que se sometieron a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal.RESULTADO PRINCIPAL: Mediante el análisis de series de tiempo interrumpido, se evaluó el efecto de la expansión de Medicaid en las probabilidades de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal.RESULTADOS: Las tasas de cirugía electiva frente a no electiva permanecieron sin cambios en general (70,2% frente a 70,7%, p = 0,63) y en las minorías etnoraciales en los estados de expansión (blancos del 72,8% al 73,8 % antes y después, p = 0,40 y no blancos del 64,0% al 63,1% pre a post, p = 0,67). Hubo un aumento instantáneo en las probabilidades de cirugía electiva en los estados de expansión frente a los de no expansión en la implementación de la política (OR ajustado 1,37, IC del 95%, 1,05-1,79, p = 0,02), pero disminuyó posteriormente (OR ajustado combinado 0,95, 95% IC, 0,92-0,99, p = 0,03). Las tasas de cirugía electiva también se mantuvieron sin cambios entre las minorías etnoraciales (cambios instantáneos en los estados de expansión, efecto combinado 1,06; antes de la tendencia 1,01 frente a la postendencia 0,98) y las personas de bajos ingresos en los estados de expansión (antes de la tendencia 1,03 frente a la postendencia 0,97; para todos, p > 0,1).LIMITACIONES: El estudio se limitó a cinco estados. Si bien los pacientes pueden tener un mayor acceso a los servicios de detección de cáncer y la expansión posterior a la cirugía, la base de datos de pacientes hospitalizados del estado solo brinda información sobre los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía.CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de los avances en la detección, la expansión de Medicaid no se asoció con reducciones en las disparidades etnoraciales o basadas en los ingresos conocidas en las tasas de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal. Ampliar el acceso a la cirugía del cáncer colorrectal para las poblaciones desatendidas probablemente requiera atención a los factores del proveedor y del sistema de salud que contribuyen a las disparidades persistentes. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C217 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil ).

Impact of Clinician Linkage on Unequal Access to High-Volume Hospitals for Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Understanding drivers of persistent surgical disparities remains an important area of cancer care delivery and policy. The degree to which clinician linkages contribute to disparities in access to quality colorectal cancer surgery is unknown. Using hospital surgical volume as a proxy for quality, the study team evaluated how clinician linkages impact access to colorectal cancer surgery at high-volume hospitals (HVHs). STUDY DESIGN: Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission was used to evaluate 6,909 patients who underwent colon or rectal cancer operations from 2013 to 2018. Two linkages based on patient sharing were examined separately for colon and rectal cancer surgery: (1) from primary care clinicians to specialists (gastroenterologist or medical oncologist) and (2) from specialists to surgeons (general or colorectal). A referral link was defined as 9 or more shared patients between 2 clinicians. Adjusted regression models examined associations between referral links and odds of receiving colon or rectal cancer operations at HVHs. RESULTS: The cohort included 5,645 colon and 1,264 rectal cancer patients across 52 hospitals. Every additional referral link between a primary care clinician and a specialist connected to a HVH was associated with a 12% and 14% increased likelihood of receiving colon (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, CI 1.07 to 1.17) and rectal (OR 1.14, CI 1.08 to 1.20]) cancer operations at a HVH, respectively. Every additional referral link between a specialist and a surgeon at a HVH was associated with at least a 25% increased likelihood of receiving colon (OR 1.28, CI 1.20 to 1.36) and rectal (OR 1.25, CI 1.15 to 1.36) cancer operation at a HVH. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of clinicians with linkages to HVHs are more likely to have their colorectal cancer operations at these hospitals. These findings suggest that policy interventions targeting clinician relationships are an important step in providing equitable surgical care.

National evaluation of patterns and predictors of underuse of multimodal therapy for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remains widely varied. Despite growing support for a multimodal approach for treatment of these rare and aggressive neoplasms, its dissemination remains underused. This national study aimed to evaluate variations in treatment patterns and uncover factors predictive of underuse of multimodal therapy in high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas. METHODS: The 2010 to 2015 National Cancer Database was used to evaluate trends in 3 common treatment patterns: surgery alone, surgery + adjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy + surgery. Demographic-, sarcoma-, hospital-, and treatment-level factors of 6,725 surgically treated patients with stage II or III intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas were evaluated by types of treatment modality. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors predictive of each treatment modality. RESULTS: When compared to surgery alone (34.6%) and adjuvant therapy (41.2%), use of neoadjuvant therapy + surgery for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remained low (25.3%). However, time trend analysis demonstrated that neoadjuvant therapy + surgery has significantly increased by 7% per year, whereas surgery alone decreased by 4% every year (P < .05 for both). Factors predictive of surgery alone were older age, nonprivate insurance, increasing travel distance, and multimorbidity (P < .05). Conversely, factors associated with neoadjuvant therapy + surgery were private insurance, higher education, and care at academic or high-volume institutions (for all, P < .05). Tumor-related factors predictive for neoadjuvant therapy + surgery included size <5 cm and higher-grade tumors (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Adoption of multimodality therapy for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remains low and gradual in the United States. Dissemination of multimodality therapy will require attention to access and hospital factors to maximize these therapies for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Did ethno-racial disparities in access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement change over time?

Objective: In this study we sought to evaluate whether disparate use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among non-White patients has decreased over time, and if unequal access to TAVR is driven by unequal access to high-volume hospitals. Methods: From 2013 to 2017, we used the State Inpatient Database across 8 states (Ariz, Colo, Fla, Md, NC, NM, Nev, Wash) to identify 51,232 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement. Hospitals were categorized as low- (<50 per year), medium- (50-100 per year), or high-volume (>100 per year) according to total valve procedures (TAVR + surgical aortic valve replacement). Multivariable logistic regression models with interactions were performed to determine the effect of race, time, and hospital volume on the utilization of TAVR. Results: Non-White patients were less likely to receive TAVR than White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83). However, utilization of TAVR increased over time (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.73-1.80) for the total population, with non-White patients' TAVR use growing faster than for White patients (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12), time × race interaction, P = .034. Further, an adjusted volume-stratified time trend analysis showed that utilization of TAVR at high volume hospitals increased faster for non-White patients versus White patients by 8.6% per year (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16) whereas use at low- and medium-volume hospitals did not contribute to any decreasing utilization gap. Conclusions: This analysis shows initial low rates of TAVR utilization among non-White patients followed by accelerated use over time, relative to White patients. This narrowing gap was driven by increased TAVR utilization by non-White patients at high-volume hospitals.

Defining a minimum hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive colon cancer resections.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy is considered the standard of care in colon cancer treatment when appropriate expertise is available. However, guidelines do not delineate what experience is required to implement this approach safely and effectively. This study aimed to establish a data-derived, hospital-level annual volume threshold for laparoscopic colectomy at which patient outcomes are optimized. METHODS: This evaluation included 44,157 stage I to III adenocarcinoma patients aged ≥40 years who underwent laparoscopic colon resection between 2010 and 2015 within the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival, with 30- and 90-day mortality, duration of stay, days to receipt of chemotherapy, and number of lymph nodes examined as secondary. Segmented logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify volume thresholds which optimized these outcomes. RESULTS: In hospitals performing ≥30 laparoscopic colectomies per year there were incremental improvements in overall survival for each additional resection beyond 30. Hospitals performing ≥30 procedures/year demonstrated improved 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 1.7%, P < .001), 90-day mortality (2.3% vs 2.9%, P < .001), and overall survival (84.3% vs 82.3%, P < .001). Those hospitals performing <30 procedures/year had no significant benefit in overall survival. Thresholds were not identified for any other outcomes. Results were comparable in colon cancer patients with stage IV or multiple cancers. CONCLUSION: A high-volume hospital threshold of ≥30 cases/year for laparoscopic colectomies is associated with improved patient survival and outcomes. A minimum volume standard may help providers determine which approach is most suitable for their hospital's practice as open procedures may yield better oncologic results in low volume settings.

Increased Access to Cardiac Surgery Did Not Improve Outcomes: Early Look Into Medicaid Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery utilization has increased after passage of the Affordable Care Act. This multistate study examined whether changes in access after Medicaid expansion (ME) have led to improved outcomes, overall and particularly among ethnoracial minorities. METHODS: State Inpatient Databases were used to identify nonelderly adults (ages 18-64 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair in 3 expansion (Kentucky, New Jersey, Maryland) vs 2 nonexpansion states (North Carolina, Florida) from 2012 to 2015. Linear and logistic interrupted time series were used with 2-way interactions and adjusted for patient-level, hospital-level, and county-level factors to compare trends and instantaneous changes at the point of ME implementation (quarter 1 of 2014) for mortality, length of stay, and elective status. Interrupted time series models estimated expansion effect, overall and by race-ethnicity. RESULTS: Analysis included 22 038 cardiac surgery patients from expansion states and 33 190 from nonexpansion states. In expansion states, no significant trend changes were observed for mortality (odds ratio, 1.01; P = .83) or length of stay (ß = -0.05, P = .20), or for elective surgery (odds ratio, 1.00; P = .91). There were similar changes seen in nonexpansion states. Among ethnoracial minorities, ME did not impact outcomes or elective status. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in cardiac surgery utilization after ME, outcomes remained unchanged in the early period after implementation, overall and among ethnoracial minorities. Future research is needed to confirm long-term trends and examine reasons behind this lack of improved outcomes.

PET/CT scan and biopsy-driven approach for safe anti-PD-1 therapy discontinuation in patients with advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on safe discontinuation of antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy in responding patients with advanced melanoma. The use of 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-PET/CT scan and tumor biopsy for assessment of active disease may be an effective predictive biomarker to guide such treatment decisions. METHODS: A retrospective study of 122 patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 combination therapy at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center was conducted. Uveal melanoma patients and those receiving concurrent experimental therapy were excluded. Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival were analyzed. Patients who decided to come off treatment typically after 12 months using CT scan radiographic complete response (CR), 18FDG-PET/CT scan complete metabolic response (CMR) or tumor biopsy of a non-CR/CMR tumor site negative for active disease (possible pathological CR) were identified and compared with patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity while their disease was in control. Event-free survival (EFS) was assessed from the last dose of anti-PD-1 therapy to progression requiring subsequent treatment (surgery, radiation, and/or systemic therapy) or referral to hospice/death due to melanoma. RESULTS: 24 (20%) patients discontinued treatment by choice with no active disease and 28 (23%) patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity with disease control after 12-month and 4-month median treatment durations, respectively. Similar baseline characteristics were observed between cohorts except higher prior receipt of ipilimumab (29% vs 7%; p=0.036) and fewer BRAF mutant positive disease (17% vs 41%; p=0.064) in patients off treatment by choice. Three-year EFS rates were 95% and 71%, respectively. No significant associations between EFS and sex, disease stage, lactate dehydrogenase elevation, BRAF status, prior systemic therapy, ECOG performance status, presence of brain metastases, or combination versus monotherapy were observed. Tumor biopsies led to alternative management in 3/10 patients due to active metastatic melanoma or second malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 therapy discontinuation after 12 months when no active disease is observed on CT scan, PET/CT scan or tumor biopsy may have low rates of disease relapse in patients with advanced melanoma. Biopsy of residual disease may frequently lead to a change in management. These findings are undergoing validation in the EA6192 trial.

ACA Medicaid expansion reduced disparities in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Early evaluation of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion demonstrated persistent disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery. Longer-term effects of expansion remain unknown. This study evaluated the impact of expansion on the use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients. METHODS: State inpatient databases (2012-2017), the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, and the Area Resource File from the Health Resources and Services Administration, were used to examine 8,264 non-elderly adults who underwent pancreatic surgery in nine expansion and two non-expansion states. High-volume hospitals were defined as performing 20 or more resections/year. Linear probability triple differences models measured pre- and post-Affordable Care Act utilization rates of pancreatic surgery at high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients versus privately insured patients in expansion versus non-expansion states. RESULTS: The Affordable Care Act's expansion was associated with increased rates of utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery by Medicaid and uninsured patients (48% vs 55.4%, P = .047) relative to privately insured patients in expansion states (triple difference estimate +11.7%, P = .022). A pre-Affordable Care Act gap in use of high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients in expansion states versus non-expansion states (48% vs 77%, P < .0001) was reduced by 15.1% (P = .001) post Affordable Care Act. A pre Affordable Care Act gap between expansion versus non-expansion states was larger for Medicaid and uninsured patients relative to privately insured patients by 24.9% (P < .0001) and was reduced by 11.7% (P = .022) post Affordable Care Act. Rates among privately insured patients remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion was associated with greater utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients. These findings are informative to non-expansion states considering expansion. Future studies should target understanding referral mechanism post-expansion.

Cardiac Surgery Utilization Across Vulnerable Persons After Medicaid Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act has reduced the number of uninsured patients, although its preferential effects on vulnerable populations have been mixed. This study examined whether ME preferentially improved cardiac surgery use by insurance strata, race, and income level. METHODS: Non-elderly adults (aged 18-64 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair were identified in the State Inpatient Databases for 3 expansion states (Kentucky, New Jersey, and Maryland) and 2 non-expansion states (North Carolina and Florida) from 2012 to the third quarter of 2015. We used adjusted Poisson interrupted time series to determine the impact of ME on cardiac surgery use for Medicaid or uninsured (MCD/UIS) patients, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals from low-income areas. RESULTS: In expansion states, use among non-White MCD/UIS patients had a positive trend after ME (2.3%/quarter; P = .156), whereas use for White MCD/UIS patients fell (-1.7%/quarter; P = .117). In contrast, use among non-White MCD/UIS in non-expansion states decreased by 4.4% (P < .001) which was a greater decline than among White MCD/UIS patients (-1.8%/quarter; P = .057). There was no substantial effect of ME on cardiac surgery use for MCD/UIS patients from low- versus high-income areas. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the use of cardiac surgical procedures was generally unchanged after ME; however, nonsignificant trend differences suggest a narrowing gap between vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups in ME states. These preliminary findings help describe the association of insurance coverage as a driver of cardiac surgery use among vulnerable patients.

Unintended Consequences of Health Care Reform: Impact of Changes in Payor Mix on Patient Safety Indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on patient safety metrics at the hospital level by expansion status, across varying levels of safety-net burden, and over time. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Medicaid expansion has raised concerns over the influx of additional medically and socially complex populations on hospital systems. Whether increases in Medicaid and uninsured payor mix impact hospital performance metrics remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the effects of expansion on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-endorsed Patient Safety Indicators (PSI-90). METHODS: Three hundred fifty-eight hospitals were identified using State Inpatient Databases (2012-2015) from 3 expansions (KY, MD, NJ) and 2 nonexpansion (FL, NC) states. PSI-90 scores were calculated using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality modules. Hospital Medicaid and uninsured patients were categorized into safety-net burden (SNB) quartiles. Hospital-level, multivariate linear regression was performed to measure the effects of expansion and change in SNB on PSI-90. RESULTS: PSI-90 decreased (safety improved) over time across all hospitals (-5.2%), with comparable reductions in expansion versus nonexpansion states (-5.9% vs -4.7%, respectively; P = 0.441) and across high SNB hospitals within expansion versus nonexpansion states (-3.9% vs -5.2%, P = 0.639). Pre-ACA SNB quartile did not predict changes in PSI-90 post-ACA. However, when hospitals increased their SNB by 5%, they incurred significantly more safety events in expansion relative to nonexpansion states (+1.87% vs -14.0%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall improvement in patient safety, increased SNB was associated with increased safety events in expansion states. Accordingly, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures may unintentionally penalize hospitals with increased SNB following Medicaid expansion.

Radical excision for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: A national propensity-matched outcomes analysis.

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, few studies have assessed if radical excision of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with adjacent organs improves survival outcomes. This propensity score-matched study aimed to evaluate the impact of radical excision versus resection of tumor alone. METHODS: The National Cancer Database 2004 to 2015 was used to assess short- and long-term outcomes of resection of tumor alone versus radical excision (tumor plus ≥1 adjacent organs) via 1:1 propensity-matched analyses. Subgroup analyses included low-grade, high-grade, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, adjacent organ involvement alone, localized tumors alone, and high-volume hospitals (≥10 resections/y). Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with radical excision. RESULTS: Comparison of propensity-matched groups (N = 1,139/group) revealed no significant differences in 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, or overall survival (for all, P > .580). For all subgroup analyses comparing resection of tumor alone with radical excision, including localized tumors without organ invasion (N = 208/group), there were no identified differences in short- or long-term survival. Although it yielded lower R2 resection rates (P = .007), radical excision was associated with greater mean length of stay (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Radical excision was not associated with improved retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma survival irrespective of grade, histology, hospital volume, or adjacent organ involvement. Resection of ostensibly involved adjacent viscera may increase morbidity without survival benefit. These results inform ongoing discussion regarding histology-tailored, situation-specific extent of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma resections.

Ethnicity and insurance status predict metastatic disease presentation in prostate, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ethnicity and insurance status have been shown to impact odds of presenting with metastatic cancer, however, the interaction of these two predictors is not well understood. We evaluate the difference in odds of presenting with metastatic disease in minorities compared to white patients despite access to the same insurance across three common cancer types. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, a multilevel logistic regression model that estimated the odds of metastatic disease was fit, adjusting for covariates including year of diagnosis, ethnicity, insurance, income, and region. We included adults diagnosed with metastatic prostate, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer from 2004 to 2015. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 1 191 241 prostate cancer (PCa), 1 310 986 breast cancer (BCa), and 1 183 029 NSCLC patients. Private insurance was the most protective factor against metastatic presentation. Odds of presenting with metastatic disease were 0.190 [95% CI, 0.182-0.198], 0.616 [95% CI, 0.602-0.630], and 0.270 [95% CI, 0.260-0.279] for PCa, NSCLC, and BCa compared to uninsured patients, respectively. Private insurance provided the most significant benefit to non-Hispanic White PCa patients with 81% reduction in odds of metastatic presentation and conferred the least benefit to African-American NSCLC patients at 30.4% reduction in odds of metastatic presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status provided the single most protective effect against metastatic presentation. This benefit varied for minorities despite similar insurance. Reducing metastatic disease presentation rates requires addressing social barriers to care independent of insurance.

Variations in Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Outcomes by Hospital Type: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) treatment. Patient- and sarcoma-related factors are well known to influence survival outcomes. The effect of hospital-related factors on long-term survival, however, are not well understood. We sought to assess the relative contribution of hospital-level factors to mortality after surgical treatment of RPS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was used to identify 10,113 patients who underwent surgical treatment of RPS. Patient-, sarcoma-, hospital-, and treatment-level factors were compared by increasing survival times. Stepwise multivariable Cox regression was performed that controlled for covariates to measure the relative contributions of these factors on overall survival (OS). Effect modification analyses ascertained how hospital type modulates the volume relationship with respect to RPS mortality. RESULTS: Factors predictive of worsening OS were older age, nonprivate insurance, low income, presence of comorbidities, tumor histology, high grade or stage, and R2 resection (for all, P < .05). Increasing hospital surgical volume predicted decreasing risk of death across all survival times. However, analysis by hospital type demonstrated that compared with academic centers, the risk of death at community centers increased significantly as surgical volume increased (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.53). CONCLUSION: Hospital factors affect mortality after surgical treatment of RPS. Specifically, hospital type alters the surgical volume-outcome relationship for RPS mortality such that community centers perform worse with increasing volumes. Recommendations that higher surgical volume improves outcomes cannot be applied universally and must be re-examined in other complex surgical cancers.

Assessing Malnutrition Before Major Oncologic Surgery: One Size Does Not Fit All.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple definitions for malnutrition, without evidence of superiority of any one definition to assess preoperative risk. Therefore, to aid in identification of patients that might warrant prehabilitation, we aimed to determine the optimal definition of malnutrition before major oncologic resection for 6 cancer types. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing elective major oncologic operations from 2005 to 2017. Nutritional status was evaluated using the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition definitions, NSQIP's variable for >10% weight loss during the previous 6 months, and the WHO BMI classification system. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the adjusted effect of nutritional status on mortality and major morbidity. RESULTS: We identified 205,840 operations (74% colorectal, 10% pancreatic, 9% lung, 3% gastric, 3% esophageal, and 2% liver). A minority (16%) of patients met criteria for malnutrition (0.6% severe malnutrition, 1% European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1, 2% European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2, 6% NSQIP, and 6% mild malnutrition), 31% were obese, and the remaining 54% had a normal nutrition status. Both mortality and major morbidity varied significantly between the nutrition groups (both p < 0.0001). An interaction between nutritional status and cancer type was observed in the models for mortality and major morbidity (interaction term p < 0.0001 for both), indicating the optimal definition of malnutrition varied by cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of malnutrition used to assess postoperative risk is specific to the type of cancer being treated. These findings can be used to enhance nutritional preparedness in the preoperative setting.

Identifying the Minimum Volume Threshold for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection: Merging National Data with Consensus Expert Opinion.

BACKGROUND: The complexity of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) surgery has prompted international recommendations to regionalize it to high-volume hospitals (HVHs). A minimum procedural volume threshold for RPS is not yet defined, hampering effective referral and regionalization in the US. This multihospital study sought to establish an HVH threshold informed by national data and international expert opinion. STUDY DESIGN: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database identified 8,721 surgically treated RPS patients. Multivariable models, using linear splines, identified annual volume thresholds predictive of overall and 90-day mortality. Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Working Group members (n = 48) completed a 15-item survey regarding these data. RESULTS: Overall mortality risk was reduced by 4% per additional case (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) up to a threshold of 13 cases/year; no further reduction was observed over 13 (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01). After revealing the results from our statistical analysis, 71.4% of respondents who initially chose >30 cases/year as a cutoff shifted their response to a lower value. More than 56% cited 11 to 20 procedures/year as the cutoff for an HVH. Median survival in hospitals with <13 vs >13 cases/year was 94 vs 139 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Forty percent of respondents cited 1% to 2% as an acceptable 90-day mortality. This was achieved with a minimum of 13 cases/year based on risk-adjusted survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter analysis to merge data-driven RPS surgery volume thresholds to clinically meaningful sarcoma expert opinions. These findings will help inform national/international consensus recommendations, a practical volume threshold, trial design, and motivate evidence-based hospital referral.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly common; however, uptake has differed by hospital type. It is unknown how these trends have evolved for laparoscopic or robotic approaches in different types of hospitals. This study assesses temporal trends for MIS utilization and examines differences in surgical outcomes by hospital type. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent CRC surgery between 2010 and 2015. Time-trend analysis of MIS utilization was performed for both approaches by hospital type (community, comprehensive community, integrated network, academic). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine MIS utilization, differences in case severity, and surgical outcomes by hospital type, after controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Across all hospital types, community hospitals had the lowest rate of laparoscopic (36.8%) and robotic (3.3%) procedures for CRC (P < 0.001). Community hospitals also exhibited a significant lag in adoption rate of robotic surgery (colon = 0.84% versus 1.41%/y; rectum = 2.14% versus 3.88 %/y). Community hospitals performing MIS had worse outcomes, including the most frequent conversions to open (colon = 15.2%; rectal = 17.1%) and highest 90-day mortality (colon = 6%; rectal = 3.2%) (P < 0.001). Finally, compared with laparoscopic colon surgery at academic centers, community centers treated lower grade tumors (OR 0.938, P < 0.05) with higher 30-day (OR 1.332, P < 0.05) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.210, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MIS for CRC lags at the community level and experiences worse postoperative outcomes. Future initiatives must focus on understanding and correcting this trend to ensure uniform access to high-quality surgical care.

Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance).

BACKGROUND: The risk of surgery, particularly for older cancer patients with serious, extensive comorbidities, can make this otherwise curative modality precarious. Leveraging data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group, this study sought to characterize age-based comparative demographics, adverse event rates, and study completion rates to define how best to conduct research in older cancer patients. METHODS: This study relied on clinical data from 21 completed studies to assess whether older patients experienced more grade 3 or worse adverse events and were more likely to discontinue study participation prematurely than their younger counterparts. RESULTS: The study enrolled 12,367 patients. The median age was 60 years, and 36% of the patients were 65 years of age or older. Among 4008 patients with adverse event data, 1067 (27%) had experienced a grade 3 or worse event. The patients 65 years or older had higher rates of grade 3 or worse adverse events compared to younger patients [32% vs. 24%; odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-1.7; p < 0.0001]. This association was not observed in multivariate analyses. The study protocol was completed by 97% of the patients. No association was observed between age and trial completion (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-1.1; p = 0.14). Only the older gastrointestinal cancer trial patients were less likely to complete their studies compared to younger patients (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.70; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite higher rates of adverse events, the older patients typically completed the study protocol, thereby contributing relevant data on how best to render care to older cancer patients and affirming the important role of enrolling these patients to surgical trials.