Preventive Antibiotic Use and Complications After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients Hospitalized for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We assessed the impact of this approach on the incidence of post-ERCP outcomes using nationwide data. METHODS: Using 2015-2021 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data and relevant ICD-10 codes, we analyzed adult hospitalizations for PSC who underwent ERCP, with and without antibiotic prophylaxis. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between prophylactic antibiotic use and post-ERCP complications including sepsis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: We analyzed 32,972 hospitalizations for PSC involving ERCP, with 12,891 admissions (39.1%) receiving antibiotics before ERCP (cases) and 20,081 (60.9%) serving as controls. Cases were older than controls (mean age: 64.2 ± 8.6 vs. 61.3 ± 6.1 years; P = 0.020). Compared with controls, hospitalizations with antibiotic prophylaxis had a higher male population (7,541 (58.5%) vs. 11,265 (56.1%); P < 0.001) and higher comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥2: 5,867 (45.5%) of cases vs. 8,996 (44.8%) of controls; P = 0.01). Incidence of post-ERCP septicemia was 19.1% (6,275) with 2,935 incidences (22.8%) among cases compared with 3,340 (16.6%) among controls. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not significantly improve the odds of septicemia (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 - 1.09; P = 0.179). Approximately 2,271 (6.9%) cases of acute cholangitis and 5,625 (17.1%) cases of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis were recorded. After adjustments for multiple variables, no significant difference was observed in the odds of cholangitis (aOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.45; P = 0.08). However, antibiotic prophylaxis was correlated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds ratio of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.66; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in hospitalizations with PSC was correlated with a significant reduction in the odds of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not improve the odds of post-ERCP sepsis or cholangitis. Prophylactic use of antibiotics should be individualized, considering both their anti-infective benefits and potential impact on the biochemical markers of liver disease.

Association between Insurance Status and Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.

Background: Lack of insurance is associated with poorer outcomes in hospitalized patients. However, few studies have explored this association in hospitalizations for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). This study examined the impact of insurance status on the outcome of NSTI admissions. Methods: All adult hospitalizations for necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, and Fournier gangrene between 2016 and 2018 were examined using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Insurance status was categorized as insured (including Medicare, Medicaid, and Private, including Health maintenance organization (HMO) or uninsured (Self-pay). Outcome measures included mortality rates, limb loss, length of hospital stay, prolonged hospital stay, and critical care admissions. Statistical analysis included weighted sample analysis, chi-square tests, multivariate regression analysis, and negative binomial regression modeling. Results: Approximately 29,705 adult hospitalizations for NSTIs were analyzed. Of these, 57.4% (17,065) were due to necrotizing fasciitis, 22% (6,545) to gas gangrene, and 20.5% (6,095) to Fournier gangrene. Approximately 9.7% (2,875) were uninsured, whereas 70% (26,780) had insurance coverage. Among the insured, Medicare covered 39.6% (10,605), Medicaid 29% (7,775), and private insurance 31.4% (8,400). After adjustments, Medicare insurance was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-2.47; p = 0.001). Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation (aOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.47; p < 0.001), whereas private insurance was associated with lower odds of amputation (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; p = 0.030). Medicaid insurance was associated with greater odds of prolonged hospital stay (aOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09-1.64; p < 0.001). No significant association was observed between the lack of insurance or self-pay and the odds of primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Medicare insurance was correlated with greater odds of mortality, whereas Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation and longer hospital stay. Uninsured status was not associated with significant differences in NSTI outcomes.

The prognostic utility of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is reportedly an effective prognostic tool across various medical and surgical fields, but its value in spinal surgery is unestablished. We aim to investigate the relationship between elevated baseline/postoperative NLR and patient outcomes in spinal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases for studies investigating the prognostic value of NLR in spine patients.Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analysed on the RevMan 5.4 software. Where meta-analysis was not possible, we vote-counted the direction of the effect of elevated NLR. The GRADE framework for prognostic factor research was utilised to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome measure. RESULTS: Five outcome measures (overall survival, mortality, disease-free survival, functional recovery and complications) were assessed across 16 studies involving 5471 patients. Elevated baseline NLR was associated with reduced overall survival (HR: 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.05 - 2.54) (GRADE: low) and worsened functional recovery (OR: 0.93, 95 % CI: 0.87 - 0.98) (GRADE: low). There was no association between baseline NLR and disease-free survival (HR: 2.42, 95 % CI: 0.49 - 11.83) (GRADE: very low) or mortality (OR: 1.39, 95 % CI: 0.41 - 4.75) (GRADE: very low). Elevated NLR levels measured on days 3-4 and days 6-7 postoperatively, but not NLR measured at baseline or on days 1-2 postoperatively, were associated with greater risks of complications (GRADE: low). CONCLUSIONS: NLR is an objective tool with the potential to identify the patients that would benefit from surgery and facilitate shared decision-making.

Increased ventilator utilization, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality in non-COVID patients during the pandemic.

Background: This study examined ventilator utilization, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence, and mortality among non-COVID patients requiring mechanical ventilation during 2019 and 2020. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for adult hospitalizations with mechanical ventilation using ICD-10 procedure codes, excluding COVID-19 patients and minors. VAP rates were calculated per 1000 adults ventilated. Outcomes included ventilation rates, VAP incidence, and mortality odds between prepandemic and pandemic-exposed hospitalizations. Results: Analyzing 1,533,775 hospitalizations, the pandemic-exposed had more male patients (57.6% vs 56.2%, P < 0.001) and nonelective admissions (95.4% vs 94.1%; P < 0.001). Non-COVID patients had a 4.5% increase in ventilator utilization in the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (P < 0.001). Pandemic VAP incidence was 17 cases per 1000 adults ventilated, compared to 11 cases in the prepandemic period (P < 0.001). Mortality rates increased from 26.9% to 31.4%, with 314 mortalities per 1000 ventilated pandemic patients compared with 269 in the prepandemic period (adjusted odds ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Significant ventilator utilization, VAP rates, and mortality increases occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gender Disparities in Hospitalization Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States.

Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by various clinical manifestations. Despite efforts to improve outcomes, mortality rates remain high, and certain disparities, including gender, may influence prognosis and mortality rates in SLE. This study aims to examine the gender disparities in outcomes of SLE hospitalizations in the US. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2016 and 2020. The NIS database is the largest publicly available all-payer database for inpatient care in the United States, representing approximately 20% of all hospitalizations nationwide. We selected every other year during the study period and included hospitalizations of adult patients (≥18 years old) with a primary or secondary diagnosis of SLE using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. The control population consisted of all adult hospitalizations. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the strength of the association between gender and primary and secondary outcomes. The regression models were adjusted for various factors, including age, race, median household income based on patients' zip codes, Charlson comorbidity index score, insurance status, hospital location, region, bed size, and teaching status. To ensure comparability across the years, revised trend weights were applied as the healthcare cost and use project website recommends. Stata version 17 (StataCorp LLC, TX, USA) was used for the statistical analyses, and a two-sided P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among the 42,875 SLE hospitalizations analyzed, women accounted for a significantly higher proportion (86.4%) compared to men (13.6%). The age distribution varied, with the majority of female admissions falling within the 30- to 60-year age range, while most male admissions fell within the 15- to 30-year age category. Racial composition showed a slightly higher percentage of White Americans in the male cohort compared to the female cohort. Notably, more Black females were admitted for SLE compared to Black males. Male SLE patients had a higher burden of comorbidities and were more likely to have Medicare and private insurance, while a higher percentage of women were uninsured. The mortality rate during the index hospitalization was slightly higher for men (1.3%) compared to women (1.1%), but after adjusting for various factors, there was no statistically significant gender disparity in the likelihood of mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.027; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.570-1.852; P=0.929). Men had longer hospital stays and incurred higher average hospital costs compared to women (mean length of stay (LOS): seven days vs. six days; $79,751 ± $5,954 vs. $70,405 ± $1,618 respectively). Female SLE hospitalizations were associated with a higher likelihood of delirium, psychosis, and seizures while showing lower odds of hematological and renal diseases compared to men. Conclusion While women constitute the majority of SLE hospitalizations, men with SLE tend to have a higher burden of comorbidities and are more likely to have Medicare and private insurance. Additionally, men had longer hospital stays and incurred higher average hospital costs. However, there was no significant gender disparity in the likelihood of mortality after accounting for various factors.